Keith Richards Destroys His Knighthood Chances
Keith Richards Destroys His Knighthood Chances |
Keith Richards Destroys His Knighthood Chances
Keith Richards Destroys His Knighthood Chances |
The Fix
The Fix - - - - - - - - - - - - Sept. 28, 2005 | Morning Briefing: And many "Benator" jokes were made: Ben Affleck insists, or at least his people do, that there is nothing to the rumors that Virginia Democrats are pushing him to run against Republican Sen. George Allen in next year's elections. As the Washington Post reported on Tuesday, "Why, who should happen to be pondering a move to Thomas Jefferson country but a certain square-jawed media magnet with a taste for liberal politics and millions to spend on it ... Ben Affleck!" Affleck and his wife, Jennifer Garner, were seen driving around rural Virginia looking at houses. But what some thought was a potential house-hunting trip was just a fun weekend for the couple, nothing more, according to Affleck's spokesman, Ken Sunshine. And while Sunshine denies the Senate rumors, he still thinks his client "would be a superb candidate for public office in the future. Right now, he's very busy directing his first feature movie for Disney, 'Gone, Baby, Gone.'" (Washington Post) Down, but not out: Kate Moss may have turned into the most publicly shamed model of all time, but she's not giving in yet. An online gambling site, in a clear bid for publicity, offered the recently unpopular model a $5 million contract to do a campaign for it, but Moss thinks she hasn't sunk that low. "This story is absolute rubbish ... Kate will not be working with this company," her publicist told the New York Daily News. And a friend of the model's told Page Six she's defiant in private, too: "She just told her agent three days ago that she doesn't give a [bleep] what people think, she will not change her lifestyle because of a tabloid or public opinion." The one job Moss might hold on to, oddly, is with the cosmetics company Rimmel, for which she just finished shooting a campaign for a product called Recover. And then there are the reports that she has been talking to director Ron Howard about starring in a movie about the fashion industry. Meanwhile, U.K. TV channel Sky One says it's going to be showing the famous snorting footage that started it all as a part of its upcoming documentary "Kate Moss: Fashion Victim?" (N.Y. Daily News, Page Six, WWD) Also: Money Quote: Turn On: |
A 'Main Event' in Old New York
New-York Historical Society |
Kate Moss The ironies of her downfall.

Kate Moss
The ironies of her downfall.
By Amanda Fortini
Updated Tuesday, Sept. 27, 2005, at 6:19 PM PT
If rumors that a model has a coke habit no longer raise an eyebrow, photos of her mid-binge apparently do. On Sept. 15, the U.K.'s Daily Mirror published grainy camera-phone stills of supermodel Kate Moss perched on a leather couch in a London recording studio, allegedly chopping and snorting multiple lines of cocaine with the quick sureness of a practiced user. (According to most reports, Moss used a £5 note to vacuum up five lines in 40 minutes.) The Swedish clothing giant H&M, whose upcoming ad campaign for its new Stella McCartney line was to feature Moss, responded that it would give the model a "second chance." She had signed, like a contrite schoolgirl, a written statement promising to remain "healthy, wholesome, and sound." But H&M reversed its position last Tuesday, announcing that the campaign would be ditched altogether. The next day, Burberry and Chanel, two retailers in Moss' robust portfolio of contracts, followed suit: The former dismissed the model from its fall ad campaign, and the latter stated, cryptically, that it had "no plans" to use her after her contract ends.
The response to H&M's action (and the subsequent domino effect) has been twofold. In one camp are the irate customers and furious bloggers who maintain that the Swedish retailer, a company that markets its inexpensive clothing to teenagers and young adults, had a duty to denounce such behavior publicly. "After the feedback from customers and other papers," an H&M spokesperson told the New York Times, "we decided we should distance ourselves from any kind of drug abuse." Not on principle, mind you, but because feedback indicated that the company's pardon would harm business. This leads to the second contingent, which calls the company out on its hypocrisy. Drug use among fashion models, this group contends, is rampant, a problem H&M was surely aware of. Moss has thus been unfairly singled out by a company hoping to save itself, as well as by a corrupt industry in need of a sacrificial cleansing. While there is some truth to this—Moss is not the only model who has been reported to indulge, she was just unlucky enough to be caught with her nose in the apparent powder—it does not take into account the fact that, as the face of several multinational brands, Moss has a public image and a responsibility to protect it. And she has not exactly been assiduous about doing so.
There's no question that H&M's action was hypocritical. It's an open secret that models dabble in drugs, particularly cocaine. ("Shock; horror—models do drugs? Oh my God, the world is going to stop," Michael Gross, author of Model: The Ugly Business of Beautiful Women, said in response to the incident.) It's even sort of understandable: How else to stay as thin as a prepubescent boy? Though we are regaled with stories of fast metabolisms, of Gisele's miraculous ability to inhale ice cream and yet fit into Victoria's Secret's smallest panties, most of us know that it is a rare woman who can consume an adequate amount of food and remain a good 20 pounds underweight. Many models subsist on a diet that includes generous quantities of cigarettes, caffeine, and cocaine, which doesn't exactly make for a person who is healthy, wholesome, and sound. Moss has, in the past, admitted to trying drugs because she was worried about getting fat. And at 31, post-pregnancy, she looks not all that different than she did at 14, when her gawky body defined the term "waif." This emaciated look is what the fashion industry demands of its models, so the policy toward methods of weight-loss has generally been don't-ask-don't-tell. If there weren't pictures to substantiate the drug allegations, it is unlikely a word would have been uttered.
Hypocritical though H&M may be, the fact is that any celebrity in Moss' position would have met with a similar fate. And indeed they have: Lavazza Coffee dropped Ingrid Parewijck, a Belgian model, after she was caught at JFK airport with several grams of cocaine. McDonald's and Nutella decided not to renew their endorsement deals with Kobe Bryant after allegations of his possible sexual misconduct surfaced. The reason for the dismissals is obvious: Featuring a celebrity in an ad campaign associates the celebrity with the product (and brand) being pushed; if that celebrity gets into trouble or falls out of favor, it reflects poorly on the brand. Arguably the world's most famous supermodel (her sloe-eyed visage is on almost every other page of fashion magazines), and a frequent tabloid presence (she's been involved with Johnny Depp, Evan Dando, Leonardo DiCaprio), Moss is a genuine celebrity. She is not paid just to be a pretty clotheshorse, but also to bestow on a product her glamorous aura. Her lucrative contracts—totaling approximately $9 million a year, by most accounts—surely hinge on the maintenance of the commodity of her celebrity, on staying out of legal trouble and at least nominally above reproach.
For years, Moss has managed to dodge any real trouble. But there have long been chinks in her image. In 1998, she checked herself into a rehab clinic for "exhaustion." In a rare interview, she admitted that she modeled drunk throughout much of the '90s. She is almost always photographed with a cigarette in one hand—she is said to have an 80-a-day habit—and a cocktail in the other. Earlier this year, she won libel damages from the Sunday Mirror for false claims that she had collapsed into a cocaine-induced coma in Barcelona. And, over the last nine months, she has fueled rumors by dating Babyshambles frontman Pete Doherty, the music world's current Sid Vicious. Doherty has been jailed for burglary and last month was arrested in Oslo for possession of heroin and crack. As a spokeswoman for designer Robert Cavalli hinted to the Times (of London): "She is not going to be going out with Pete Doherty and having milk and cheesecake every night, is she?"
The irony is that the rumors of bad behavior, the rock 'n' roll lifestyle, have always been part of Moss' allure. The fashion world has long courted, and profited from, her edgy, bad-girl image and her gaunt, post-hangover looks. It was Moss, in fact, who ushered in the controversial "heroin chic" look when she graced the cover of The Face in 1990. But whereas a gangly body is a natural state for an adolescent, for a woman, it is, well, much harder to maintain. And perhaps H&M, understanding this, waited to take the measure of the public's pulse before acting. An anonymous marketing executive linked to H&M told the Independent, "There has been a period of a few days where people have waited to see which way the wind is blowing on this." As it happened, the appearance of drugged-out chic was acceptable; the reality was not.
But the peculiar logic of the fashion world may rehabilitate her yet. A weird sort of awe ran through much of the writing on the incident; writers marveled at how amazing Moss looked, dressed in hot pants and Nancy Sinatra boots, even while allegedly getting high in the wee hours of the morning. Others wondered how she treats her body with such disregard and still remains "miraculous and miraculously unimpaired": What's her secret? Not surprisingly, in the fashion industry, image is everything. Moss knows this as well as anyone. Like Garbo, she rarely grants interviews, and she never leaves her house in sweatpants but only in some artfully unstudied, impossibly chic ensemble. Last week, after the news broke, she emerged from the Mercer hotel as stylish and as silent as ever. More than a week later, she made only a brief and elliptical statement, released through her agency, saying that she is taking "difficult steps" to address her "various personal issues." Perhaps, after 17 years, Moss knows to battle the industry on its own terms and that, sadly, if she can come through with her looks intact, that may be enough.
Amanda Fortini is a Slate contributor.
Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2126381/
Inside the club that influences Vegas' music scene more than you may know
|
Implant Program for Heart Device Was a Sales Spur
By January, about 80 cardiologists nationwide completed an evaluation run by the Guidant Corporation of one of its products, an improved electrical component, known as a lead, that connects an implanted cardiac device to the heart. In exchange for implanting the lead in three patients and completing five survey forms, each physician received $1,000 from Guidant. "The primary purpose of the study was to get feedback on how well the system worked," said Dr. Wayne O. Adkisson, a cardiologist in Portsmouth, Va., who took part. The program did generate feedback. But internal Guidant documents and e-mail messages provided to The New York Times suggest that the initiative also had another apparent goal - increasing sales of the company's most sophisticated and expensive heart devices. Those devices are advanced pacemakers called cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, or C.R.T.'s. They cost about $29,000 each. The program proved so successful in increasing Guidant C.R.T. sales that when the survey ended in January, company executives sent around congratulatory e-mail messages, the records show. "It generated 300+ implants," one January e-mail message stated. "Let's say that just 25% were incremental ... that yields >$2 million in new sales with physicians who are not necessarily Guidant friendly. We paid each physician who completed all five surveys $1,000 so our total cost was $80,000." In a statement, Guidant said that it ran surveys like the lead evaluation to generate data on how doctors use company products so that it could improve future models. Critics of the industry have long charged that some companies have used research studies to mask what are really marketing efforts that provide financial incentives to doctors to get them to use a new drug. Now, the Guidant documents and recent interviews suggest that the line between research and product promotion may also be blurring where heart devices are concerned. A C.R.T. regulates the beating of one side of the heart independently from the other. The Guidant lead was intended to be easier to use and to reduce the chronic hiccupping that some implant patients develop when a lead from a C.R.T. is placed too close to a nerve. The Guidant records indicate that many doctors approached by the company to take part in its lead study were not those who regularly implanted its heart devices, but rather those more apt to use the units of competitors. Though the agreement signed by doctors taking part in the lead evaluation did not explicitly require them to implant a Guidant C.R.T. along with the lead, they effectively had to do so because of software-related issues. One Guidant document is a chart that indicates that, on average, the monthly number of company C.R.T.'s implanted by physicians taking part nearly doubled during the survey period that began last September. A person professing to be a Guidant employee provided the documents to The Times. The Times provided Guidant either with copies or text from the documents. Guidant, while declining to confirm the records, did not dispute their authenticity. "In order to respond best to the needs of patients and preferences of physicians, Guidant has sometimes utilized market research and evaluation programs of our F.D.A.-approved and -cleared products," said Guidant. The disclosure of the records comes amid a growing controversy over how heart device manufacturers release data about product failures to doctors and patients. Since late May, Guidant has recalled tens of thousands of heart devices, and some units implanted during the survey were probably among the models affected. The two other major heart device companies, Medtronic Inc. and St. Jude Medical, also said they run product evaluation programs. All three companies said their payments to doctors for taking part in such surveys reflected reasonable compensation for a physician's time. "Any payments made in connection with such surveys are in modest amounts," Medtronic said in a statement. A number of physicians who participated in the Guidant evaluation said their involvement in such reviews did not influence which company's units they implanted. Still, the Guidant survey and ones like it raise questions about what doctors tell patients about any added payments they may be receiving in connection with a heart product's use, several experts said. Several doctors who took part in the Guidant survey said that they did not tell their patients about the payments they received. It is illegal under federal law in certain circumstances to provide financial benefits to doctors to induce them to use a product or service. In its statement, Guidant said that all of its research and evaluation programs "are intended to comply with applicable laws." Product evaluation surveys like the Guidant one are far less rigorous than a traditional clinical study of a drug or a medical device in their purpose, scientific rigor and oversight. But several heart specialists suggested in interviews that heart device makers may also be using formal post-marketing studies of devices that the Food and Drug Administration has already approved - to increase sales as they battle for market share. There is little question that many post-marketing studies of heart devices like defibrillators and pacemakers have yielded crucial data, including those that have shown patients implanted with defibrillators survive longer than patients who are treated only with drugs. A defibrillator sends out an electrical charge intended to interrupt a chaotic and often fatal type of heart rhythm. A pacemaker regulates a heart that is beating too fast or too slowly. But other post-marketing studies may yield far less data. Consider, for example, a study that St. Jude Medical is currently running. It began recruiting doctors and medical centers last October to participate in a study intended to follow for two years the health outcomes of 5,000 patients implanted with either a defibrillator or a C.R.T. with a defibrillator made by St. Jude Medical. A copy of the study's protocol shows that St. Jude Medical will pay $2,000 to doctors or medical centers for every patient. Of that amount, a doctor will get $500 when a device is implanted, with the remainder paid over a two-year period when a physician submits patient data. According to the protocol, the study, which is technically called an outcomes registry, will yield data on how different types of heart patients implanted with the St. Jude Medical devices fare over time. The Times asked four cardiologists not involved in the study to review the protocol. Two of the doctors said that the study might provide St. Jude Medical with some useful data about its device. But the other two doctors said they saw little value in it. One, Dr. Robert Rea, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, said, "The amount of information that can be gleaned from these kind of trials is relatively limited." St. Jude Medical, which is based in St. Paul, said it believed that the study would produce valuable information. "We also hope that some of the analyses from the registry will lead to additional product advancements and help us to define specific test hypotheses for future prospective, randomized clinical studies," the company said in a statement. The company also said in its statement that study data would be given to Medicare and to the F.D.A., the latter to fulfill post-marketing study obligations imposed by the F.D.A. In order to get reimbursement, Medicare now requires doctors to submit data to a national registry it operates when they implant a defibrillator. There is nothing to suggest that doctors implanting heart devices, either in connection with clinical studies or product surveys, are doing so unnecessarily. And several doctors, including those not involved in the evaluation of the new Guidant lead, said that the component offered potential benefits. At issue is the way that electricity is conducted from an advanced pacemaker - a C.R.T. - into the heart. A C.R.T. has three leads. Each carries electrical impulses, which cycle at various rates, like, say, 60 beats a minute. But if the wire put on the heart's left ventricle is positioned too close to a nerve, the regular electrical impulse it emits can set off involuntary hiccupping. While relatively rare, the problem may require added surgery, which poses risks for the patient. The Guidant lead allows the pulsing position to be changed electronically. Dr. Marc J. Girsky, a cardiologist in Los Angeles who took part in the Guidant survey, said he believed that one purpose was to collect data on the various tests and methods that different doctors used to implant the new lead so that a uniform technique might be developed. "It is not clear what the established technique would be," Dr. Girsky said. Some physicians like Dr. Girsky who took part in the survey, which was known by the acronym MERITS, often used Guidant devices. But many other doctors involved did not, company records indicate. Along with the January e-mail message that refers to "physicians who are not necessarily Guidant friendly" - an industry euphemism for doctors who are not regular customers - another Guidant e-mail message that month stated that the program was "targeted at our 'B' customers." A spreadsheet also shows that some doctors had implanted few, if any, Guidant C.R.T.'s before September of last year. Dr. Adkisson, the cardiologist in Virginia, was one of them. In a recent interview, he said that about 90 percent of the devices he used in recent years were Medtronic units, and that one of the two hospitals where he practiced had a contract with that company. Still, when approached by a Guidant sales representative last fall about becoming involved in the lead survey, he said he agreed because he liked doing research. "I thought there was enough legitimacy to it to say it was O.K.," Dr. Adkisson said. Doctors filled out one form when the survey started, one form after each of three implants and one form at the end of the survey. The questionnaires sought technical data about the lead's use as well as a doctor's subjective impressions. Dr. Adkisson said that it took him about 10 minutes to fill out each form. As technical data from the survey came into Guidant, company officials projected the impact of C.R.T.'s used by doctors in the survey on revenue, the documents indicate. C.R.T.'s are the fastest-growing and most profitable segment of the heart device industry. Both Ronald W. Dollens, the chief executive of Guidant, and J. Frederick McCoy Jr., the head of its cardiac implant unit, did not respond to written questions related to their awareness of the program In its statement, Guidant said that the data collected from the lead survey was already being put to good use. "In an effort to be responsive to our physician customers, we take feedback from physicians regarding post-market products very seriously," the company stated. "Data collected were aggregated and provided to more than 30 Guidant product development engineers in June 2005." Dr. Adkisson said last week that he had yet to see it. |
Montoya wins Brazilian GP, Alonso is world champion

Podium: race winner Juan Pablo Montoya with Kimi Raikkonen and Fernando Alonso
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race
Montoya wins Brazilian GP, Alonso is world champion
Racing series F1
Date 2005-09-25
By Nikki Reynolds - Motorsport.com
McLaren's Juan Pablo Montoya took victory at the Brazilian Grand Prix after gaining the lead early in the race and holding it to the chequered flag. Kimi Raikkonen was second to give McLaren its first one-two finish for five years. However, the biggest result was that Renault's Fernando Alonso finished third to become the youngest ever Formula One world champion.
There was rain at Interlagos on Sunday morning but by the time for the race it was dry, although there were damp patches on the track and the weather was overcast. Sauber had made an alteration to Jacques Villeneuve's car, the roll bar, under parc fermé conditions, which is not permitted, so Villeneuve had to start from the pit lane as a penalty.
Tiago Monteiro's Jordan pulled into the pit lane at the end of the formation lap with a clutch gremlin, which wasted his excellent qualifying result. At the start pole-sitter Alonso shot away in the lead and Raikkonen just flew off the line from fifth to attack the third placed Renault of Giancarlo Fisichella. He quickly got past, as did Ferrari's Michael Schumacher but behind them there was trouble.
In the midfield David Coulthard's Red Bull took on the Williams pair of Antonio Pizzonia and Mark Webber in front. They rapidly discovered that three cars into the space of one does not go; it was difficult to see exactly what happened but it appeared that Pizzonia and Coulthard touched first then Pizzonia hit Webber. All three spun off at the first corner, Pizzonia and Coulthard out while Webber managed to get back to the pits.
It was a lost cause for Webber as his car burst into flames at the rear, which was quickly extinguished by the pit crew. "I got a reasonable start," said Webber. "Down to the first corner David and Antonio touched and Antonio spun into me. I had bodywork damage but I didn't know if it could be repaired but then the car caught fire anyway." As it happened, Williams managed to repair the car and send Webber back out later.
Due to the incident the safety car was deployed for a couple of laps while the debris was cleared. Alonso was leading Montoya and Raikkonen but when the safety car went in Alonso had a wobble at the first corner and went a wide. He did pretty well to keep it on track but Montoya charged and got past for the lead. Raikkonen was then right behind Alonso and behind them Fisichella got back past Michael for fourth.
Jenson Button's BAR had dropped a couple of places at the start and was sixth, followed by Christian Klien's Red Bull and the Ferrari of Rubens Barrichello. Felipe Massa, who was eighth on the grid, also lost out and the Sauber was tenth behind the Toyota of Ralf Schumacher. Takuma Sato, who had started from the back, got his BAR up to 11th and Toyota's Jarno Trulli, who also started from near the back, was up to 13th.
After the exciting and confusing start, the race settled down and was less than spectacular for the remainder. Montoya, Alonso and Raikkonen were holding station at the front, Montoya four seconds ahead of the Renault. Massa was the first to pit on lap 18, followed by the Jordan of Narain Karthikeyan. Villeneuve was stuck behind the Minardi of Robert Doornbos in 13th but finally managed to get past.
Montoya and Alonso were trading fastest laps then Alonso pitted on lap 22. He rejoined sixth and Fisichella and Barrichello came in on the next lap. The rest cycled through at regular intervals, Michael getting back ahead of Fisichella, and Montoya came in on lap 28. He rejoined behind Raikkonen as Kimi was on a very long first stint. The Finn pitted on lap 31 and many thought that he was on a one-stopper, but it didn't appear that he was fuelled enough to get to the flag.
The top three retained formation, followed by Michael, Fisichella and Sato, who had yet to pit, then Button and Barrichello. Villeneuve finally took his first stop on lap 35 and Sato was the last to pit a couple of laps later. That allowed Klien to move back into the points in eighth. Doornbos pulled into the pits to retire with an oil leak and Barrichello was homing in on Button. He got past the BAR after a bit of a tussle through the first two corners.
The middle stint of the race was fairly sedate and Massa kicked off the second round of stops. Ralf jumped Klien's Red Bull to gain eighth but aside from that there were no changes. Monteiro, who was doing so well with his season of finishing every race, pulled his Jordan off track with a hydraulic problem. Raikkonen sped into the pits for a quick splash-and-dash second stop but it didn't gain him any ground. He came out alongside Montoya but Juan Pablo had the momentum and stayed ahead.
And that was pretty much it. There was no reason for Montoya to help Raikkonen as Alonso was running a solid third, which was what the Spaniard needed to secure the title. So the McLarens held formation and Montoya took the chequered flag to win his second consecutive Brazilian GP. With Raikkonen second, McLaren's one-two now puts the team two points ahead of Renault in the constructors' standings.
"That was a lot of fun," said Montoya. "I had a really good fight with Kimi and it was definitely not easy keeping him behind. He came especially close after the second pitstop but not close enough. It's great to win in Brazil for the second time in a row particularly as a lot of Colombian fans come here to support me. I think we definitely deserve the Constructors' Championship and I can't wait for the last two races. Also well done to Fernando."
Raikkonen, naturally, was disappointed but vows to fight on. "Congratulations to Fernando, but he better be prepared for me and the team to fight him hard for the rest of the season and next year. Today's race was quite difficult and my car was not easy to drive. I carried a bit more fuel than Juan Pablo, but I still was not able to get past him in the pitstops, and he drove a good race."
Of course, despite McLaren's well deserved result, Interlagos was all about Alonso. It had seemed inevitable for some time that Fernando would surely win the title and the 24 year-old Spaniard did what he had to do in Brazil to become the youngest ever world champion, beating a record set in 1972 by Emerson Fittipaldi. Alonso took off his helmet in parc fermé, looking very calm and collected, paused, then let out a heartfelt scream of triumph. A deserved one at that.
"It is too early to realise what is happening to me, and I think I will only understand properly in the days to come," said the new champion. "So far, I have spoken to the King of Spain, the Prince and the Prime Minister -- it is impossible to really say anything about it now."
"I want to dedicate this championship to my family, and all my close friends who have supported me through my career. Spain is not a country with an F1 culture, and we had to fight alone, every step of the way, to make this happen. A huge thank you to the team as well: they are the best in Formula 1, and we have done this together."
Ferrari was a little more competitive, with Michael fourth and Barrichello sixth, although obviously it was a result below the Scuderia's aspirations. Fisichella came home fifth and Button's BAR just didn't have the straight line speed to keep him near the front and he finished seventh. Ralf took the final point in eighth. Klien's Red Bull didn't have the race pace after his exemplary qualifying performance and he finished ninth. Sato completed the top ten.
Massa and Villeneuve squabbled amongst themselves and were 11th and 12th respectively, while Trulli struggled home 13th. Christijan Albers was almost unseen and bought his Minardi across the line 14th, with Karthikeyan trailing behind in 15th to be the last finisher. After the first couple of laps of intrigue Brazil was not really a very exciting race as far as action was concerned, but a race that sees a new champion crowned for the first time in five years has an excitement of its own.
Alonso is a very deserving champion. Some may say that Fernando was lucky but that's an argument that does not hold up. A driver may win a race or two thanks to the misfortunes of rivals but a world championship is not won by luck. Congratulations to Fernando Alonso and to Renault for giving him the car to do it. Final top eight classification: Montoya, Raikkonen, Alonso, M. Schumacher, Fisichella, Barrichello, Button, R. Schumacher

Fernando Alonso and Flavio Briatore
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race

2005 World Champion Fernando Alonso celebrates
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race

Fernando Alonso
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-23 (Interlagos): Friday practice 1

Driver suit of Michael Schumacher
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-23 (Interlagos): Friday practic

Fernando Alonso
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-23 (Interlagos): Friday practice

2005 World Champion Fernando Alonso celebrates with Renault F1 team members
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday r
Monday, September 26, 2005

2005 World Champion Fernando Alonso celebrates with Renault F1 team members
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race
Brazilian GP: Renault race notes
Fernando Alonso third and Giancarlo Fisichella fifth this afternoon in Brazil. The Spaniard becomes the youngest world champion in F1 history.
Fernando Alonso today became the youngest world champion in Formula One history, after his thirteenth podium finish of the 2005 season in the Brazilian Grand Prix at Interlagos.
Starting from pole position, the Spaniard drove a characteristically aggressive, consistent race to claim third position at the flag. With a championship lead of 23 points, and only two races remaining in the 2005 season, he therefore has an unassailable lead in the drivers' championship.
At 24 years old, he therefore will become the youngest world champion in F1 history, in addition to the records of youngest holder of pole position and youngest race-winner he already holds.
Team-mate Giancarlo Fisichella suffered a more complicated race, after struggling with oversteer that limited his pace. After starting third, the Italian finished fifth, just behind Michael Schumacher's Ferrari.
The Mild Seven Renault F1 Team now occupies second place in the constructors' championship with 162 points, 2 behind McLaren Mercedes. An all-out fight for the constructors' crown will be the object of the final two races of the season.
Fernando Alonso: 3rd
"It is too early to realise what is happening to me, and I think I will only understand properly in the days to come. So far, I have spoken to the King of Spain, the Prince and the Prime Minister -- it is impossible to really say anything about it now."
"I thought we could fight with the McLarens today but it was clear after the first stops that we couldn't keep their pace, so I just concentrated on controlling Michael Schumacher behind me, and managing the tyres."
"The engineers were also worried it might rain, so in the last laps I was really focusing on that, and preserving the tyres, and I was sure there were strange noises coming from the car, so it was only when I crossed the line that I realised I had become world champion!"
"I want to dedicate this championship to my family, and all my close friends who have supported me through my career. Spain is not a country with an F1 culture, and we had to fight alone, every step of the way, to make this happen."
"A huge thank you to the team as well: they are the best in Formula 1, and we have done this together. It will say that I am world champion, but we are all champions, and they deserve this."
"Now, I can go to the last two races and enjoy them a bit more. We made some conservative decisions in some of the last races, and now we will be able to race with nothing to lose until the end of the season.
Giancarlo Fisichella, 5th:
"I had poor rear end grip at the beginning of the race, and that meant I was struggling with oversteer in the high speed and low speed corners, and just trying to keep the car on the circuit."
"To be honest, I was a little disappointed to finish fifth because we should have been able to beat the Ferrari today, but the really important thing is Fernando becoming world champion. I am very happy for him, he has done a great season with no mistakes, and I wish him all the best."
"But we still have a second crown to race for, and we need to keep fighting against McLaren to get back the lead. I though we were much closer to them this weekend, so their pace in the race was a surprise. We're not giving up though, and we will fight to the very end of the season.
Flavio Briatore, Managing Director:
"I am just delighted today. For Fernando of course, who has been fantastic all season, and for the team as well. They have produced a fantastic car and even if McLaren has been quicker, the points tell the only story that matters, over nineteen races."
"Fernando is just 24 years old, and he has been an incredible leader in this championship. The team works to make the car quicker, and he transforms that into results: that gives the team amazing motivation."
"Of course, we have to thank the team back in Enstone and Viry, all the partners who have supported us to make this championship possible, and everybody at the Renault group: they have all been part of a fantastic adventure."
"Now, we need to do our best in the constructors' championship, with Fisico and Fernando both pushing hard. We are doing our best to get closer to McLaren, and to take it down to the final race."
Pat Symonds, Executive Director of Engineering:
"Fernando is a worthy champion, and thoroughly deserves every success he has achieved this year. The race itself was not dramatic for either driver, but it certainly produced a spectacular result."
"Now, we will be focusing 100% on the constructors' championship. There is no doubt McLaren are quicker than us, and we relinquished our lead today -- albeit by a slender margin. But the team is working hard to develop the car and improve our speed, and we were certainly closer to them this weekend thanks to the developments at Enstone and Viry."
"We fully intend to take the fight to McLaren right up until Shanghai. But first things first: we will be celebrating a worthy champion this evening, and letting the feeling sink in properly!"
-renault-
Exiled Iranians Try to Foment Revolution From France

Stuart Isett for The New York Times
"I’m optimistic. It may not happen in my generation, but eventually the mullahs will go."
AUVERS-SUR-OISE, France
MARYAM RAJAVI, a wide-eyed woman who goes by the title president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, is eager to talk about the latest discovery by her spies: mile-long tunnels, large enough to drive trucks into, dug into the mountains outside of Tehran.
"There are at least 14 to 15 tunnels of this magnitude that have been built secretly," she said, sitting in a cream-colored reception room on the cramped grounds of her compound here. She suggested that the tunnels were hiding elements of a clandestine nuclear weapons program that the United States suspects exists but that inspectors have yet to find.
It would be easy to dismiss Mrs. Rajavi as a self-serving political zealot in a powder-blue suit with matching head scarf and shoes, except that her group has been right before.
In August 2002 the group, which says it has thousands of followers based in Iraq, announced that Iran was pursuing a secret uranium enrichment program that could be used in building a nuclear bomb. The information turned out to be true and led to the current standoff over Iran's nuclear development program. The group's many subsequent disclosures have been either less significant or plain wrong.
The sleepy town of Auvers-sur-Oise, 20 miles northwest of Paris, is best known as the place where van Gogh lived the last months of his life. Japanese and American tourists wander uncertainly down its main street, peering at reproductions of his paintings in front of the buildings that they portray. Few of the tourists are aware that the town is now home to an almost cult-like Iranian opposition group, some of whose members have divorced their spouses as an act of loyalty to the cause and whose armed wing is on the State Department's list of foreign terrorist organizations. The group's devotion to Mrs. Rajavi is so extreme that some members set themselves on fire when she was briefly detained by the French police two years ago.
Mrs. Rajavi, 52, favors color-coordinated outfits that bring out the blue in her pale gray eyes and has a broad, almost impish smile that threatens to spill into laughter at almost any moment. She grew up in Tehran as the daughter of a middle-class civil servant descended from a member of the Qajar dynasty, which ruled Iran for 125 years before a 1921 coup by Reza Khan, an army officer, led to his election as hereditary shah four years later and the establishment of the Pahlavi dynasty.
THE family opposed the Pahlavis' rule, and Mrs. Rajavi said her own activism began in earnest when she was 22 after her sister, Narges, was killed by the shah's secret police. Mrs. Rajavi soon joined the Mujahedeen Khalq, or People's Holy Warriors, an association of leftist students formed in 1965 that became one of the most active groups opposing Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Mrs. Rajavi gradually rose in the ranks of the mujahedeen and, after the shah's overthrow in 1979, she married a fellow member and had two children. But the family fled to France after the Islamic government of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini turned against the mujahedeen and began executing its members. Mrs. Rajavi said another of her sisters, who was eight months pregnant, was killed in the crackdown.
In Paris, Mrs. Rajavi worked closely with the mujahedeen's charismatic leader, Massoud Rajavi, whose first wife, Ashraf, had also been killed in Iran. Mr. Rajavi's second wife was the daughter of Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, Iran's progressive president in the early days following the shah's fall. His second marriage ended after he and Mr. Bani-Sadr had a falling out in exile. Mrs. Rajavi said her own marriage to Mr. Rajavi, in 1985, was a calculated political move.
"My responsibility against the mullahs' regime and against Khomeini drove me to the conclusion that I couldn't have the same normal marital relationship that people in ordinary lives would have," she said. "So it was my own very definitely political decision."
Mr. Rajavi was expelled from France in 1986 and moved to Iraq, where he established a military camp named after his first wife. He was last seen shortly before the American invasion and, according to the mujahedeen, he is presumed to be in hiding from Iranian assassination squads. Mrs. Rajavi will say only that she is sure he is alive. In the meantime, she is in charge of the exile group.
In her small, leafy compound squeezed between the town's soccer field and the Oise River, Mrs. Rajavi and about 100 followers pursue their single-minded goal of overthrowing the fundamentalist Islamic theocracy in Tehran and installing a government of their own with Mrs. Rajavi as president until new elections can be held.
None of Mrs. Rajavi's answers are short or immediately to the point. She speaks volumes on a Castro-like scale, though her message remains a narrow one: that the organization has been unfairly labeled a terrorist organization out of the West's misguided efforts to engage the Iranian government, and that the only real hope to effect change in Iran short of war is to support her organization and give it free rein.
She presents herself as a beacon of progressive Islamic politics, the antithesis, as she puts it, of the fundamentalist Shiite mullahs running Iran. But the rigidity of her organization and extreme devotion of its members has given the organization a fanatical cast.
HER smile takes on a steely glint when she discusses the mass divorces ordered by the group's leadership, which split the movement's families in 1989 and sent their children into foster care abroad. The policy has focused energy on the cause instead of personal relations, she said.
"Our members can't have, because of the circumstances, the normal marital status in life that everyone else in the world can enjoy," Mrs. Rajavi said, arguing that the movement faces a "ferocious" enemy and followers cannot afford to be distracted.
To illustrate her point, she opened a thick book filled with photos of people she says were supporters of the movement who were killed by the Iranian government. There are 21,676 names in the book, just a sixth of the "martyrs" that her organization claims to date.
"Every single member of this movement sincerely believes in the goal of democracy and has made sacrifices for it," Mrs. Rajavi said, her smile never wavering. "I don't call this fanaticism."
Only on the subject of the self-immolations by some members does she concede that devotion to the cause has sometimes been misdirected. After the police took her into custody in July 2003 during an investigation of the group, several followers set themselves on fire. Two died.
"I was extremely saddened by those deaths," she said, but she blamed the French authorities for not letting her speak to the demonstrators who had gathered to protest her arrest. She said the followers believed that she and her followers were going to be deported to Iran, "so they felt that there was nothing else that they could do."
Many critics say the organization is reviled in much of Iran for having sought shelter with Saddam Hussein's government in Iraq, but Mrs. Rajavi says that is not so. She denies that the movement ever accepted financial support from Iraq or fought against Iraqi Shiites and Kurds on Mr. Hussein's behalf, as some people claim. As evidence of her organization's continuing viability, she cites the group's revelations about Iran's secret nuclear activities.
"This is the result of a resistance movement having a very wide social base and having deep roots and being present in all sectors of Iranian society," she said, leaning back and opening her hands.
Mrs. Rajavi's French residence permit expires in 2006. While her aides say she has been given permanent political-refugee status in France, that has not been confirmed by French officials. Iraq, meanwhile, has inserted a clause in its draft constitution that prohibits political asylum for "those accused of committing international or terror crimes," making the group's future welcome there uncertain.
Still, Mrs. Rajavi keeps smiling.
"I'm optimistic," she said. "It may not happen in my generation, but eventually the mullahs will go."
Buzz Yahoo
Seeking Meaning in Search
Thursday September 22, 2005 3:00AM PT
Dictionary Searches |
Whether it's a three-dollar word tossed around at congressional hearings or the latest journalistic jargon, confounding words are ubiquitous.
Let's look up the top 10 entries in the Search lexicon...
Recent Comments