A journey to discover the origins
Maranello, 29 June 2012 – Maranello has to be the starting point. This is why in the Ferrari Cavalcade’s logbook, after the first stamp at the Museo Enzo Ferrari in Modena, the town in Emilia is the destination of the over 110 participating Ferraris.
It is a return to the roots of the Prancing Horse with an intense programme for the second day, including laps on the Fiorano race track.
Ferrari Cavalcade delights spectators and participants
Bologna, 28 June 2012 – 110 Ferraris in the streets one uses every day doesn’t happen very often. The exception proved the rule today as long as you were present where the Ferrari Cavalcade passed.
The cars started in Bologna to the event organised by Ferrari with the idea to let the clients of the Prancing Horse feel the magic of the places connected to the history of the manufacturer from Maranello. They went to Imola where they were welcomed by the people who remembered the numerous successes Ferrari had here on this track. And then they arrived in Lugo, home of the Baracca family and of the symbol of the Prancing Horse, where the Ferrari Cavalcade was greeted with enthusiasm.
After the roads of the river Po delta the cars arrived at the Pomposa Abbey, where the people who had a visit planned didn’t know if they should visit the abbey or watch the parked Ferraris from close up. Before the Cavalcade drove back to Bologna they stopped in Ferrara in the shade of the marvelous Castello Estense.
Discovering the places and roads, which are forever connected to the brand of the Prancing Horse, accompanied by a stunning landscape and behind the wheel your own Ferrari.
Bologna, 28 June 2012 – This is the Ferrari Cavalcade – an initiative especially wanted by Ferrari Chairman Luca di Montezemolo – now at the start of its successful first edition: more then 110 participants, clients from all over the world, who started this morning at 9am in Bologna in their cars from the Prancing Horse.
The Ferrari Cavalcade left in the direction of Imola where the cars will arrive at the “Enzo e Dino Ferrari” circuit. The cavalcade is lead by someone special in the car number 00: Giancarlo Fisichella, winner of the 80th edition of the 24 Hours of Le Mans in the GTE Pro category with the 458 Italia. After the ride on the track in Imola with three ability tests the over 110 cars participating in the Ferrari Cavalcade will drive to the river Po delta with a rich programme accompanying them.
Over 100 clients from the Prancing Horse from all over the world discovering the Emilia region on the roads of the legendary races of the past
Maranello, 26 June 2012 – More than 100 Ferrari clients from all over the world will discover places in Emilia Romagna and Tuscany, connected to the birth of the manufacturer from Maranello, with their own cars from the recent production from Thursday, 28 to Saturday, 30 June on the legendary roads of these Italian regions. They will drive on the roads of the Mille Miglia and on the Savio circuit, but also on the tracks where Ferrari has raced and won several times, such as Imola and Mugello as well as Fiorano, where the cars from the Prancing Horse are developed.
The Ferrari Cavalcade will start in Bologna in the direction of Imola and the “Dino e Enzo Ferrari” race track at the Santerno river, where the participants will carry out ability tests for the regularity race. The first day will be dedicated to the roads of the plain in Emilia-Romagna: Lugo, home of the Baracca family, where the Prancing Horse will be celebrated, along the roads of the river Po delta to visit the Pomposa Abbey, coming back via Ferrara degli Estensi on wonderful roads through the so called Pianura Padana. Friday will be dedicated to the area around Modena and the places connected to Ferrari with a visit in Maranello and laps on the Fiorano track. On the conclusive day the cars will drive though the Apennine to arrive at the Mugello circuit and later on at the Piazza della Signoria in Florence. The final stage of the 600 kilometres will lead to Bologna on the roads of the Mille Miglia with the legendary Futa and Raticosa passes.
The list of the participants’ countries underlines the internationality of the Ferrari brand: USA, China, Lebanon, Honk Kong, UAE, Mexico, South Africa and naturally Europe with France Germany, Belgium, the UK and Russia, just to name a few. The Cavalcade event is a way to introduce the clients of the Prancing Horse to the wonderful landscape, the artistic wonders and the exceptional cuisine of Italy. This will also be the philosophy of the upcoming Cavalcade events, which will bring the Ferrari clients to Italy’s most important places to discover hidden gems of this marvellous country.
The final check of the route has been carried out by the official website Ferrari.com with a 458 Spider, the perfect open car for such an exciting tour, with its stunning engine sound of the 570 bhp V8, which won the “Best Performance Engine of the Year” Award.
The updates from the Ferrari Cavalcade stages will be available on Ferrari.com with exclusive photos and videos.
Nora Ephron on the set of her 2009 film, “Julie & Julia,” starring Ms. Streep, seated. More Photos »
Nora Ephron in 1998 on home turf, the Upper West Side. More Photos »
Nora Ephron, an essayist and humorist in the Dorothy Parker mold (only smarter and funnier, some said) who became one of her era’s most successful screenwriters and filmmakers, making romantic comedy hits like “Sleepless in Seattle” and “When Harry Met Sally,” died Tuesday night in Manhattan. She was 71.
The cause was pneumonia brought on by acute myeloid leukemia, her son Jacob Bernstein said.
In a commencement address she delivered in 1996 at Wellesley College, her alma mater, Ms. Ephron recalled that women of her generation weren’t expected to do much of anything. But she wound up having several careers, all of them successfully and many of them simultaneously.
She was a journalist, a blogger, an essayist, a novelist, a playwright, an Oscar-nominated screenwriter and a movie director — a rarity in a film industry whose directorial ranks were and continue to be dominated by men. Her later box-office success included “You’ve Got Mail” and “Julie & Julia.” By the end of her life, though remaining remarkably youthful looking, she had even become something of a philosopher about age and its indignities.
“Why do people write books that say it’s better to be older than to be younger?” she wrote in “I Feel Bad About My Neck,” her 2006 best-selling collection of essays. “It’s not better. Even if you have all your marbles, you’re constantly reaching for the name of the person you met the day before yesterday.”
Nora Ephron was born on May 19, 1941, on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, the eldest of four sisters, all of whom became writers. That was no surprise; writing was the family business. Her father, Henry, and her mother, the former Phoebe Wolkind, were Hollywood screenwriters who wrote, among other films, “Carousel,” “There’s No Business Like Show Business” and“Captain Newman, M.D.”
“Everything is copy,” her mother once said, and she and her husband proved it by turning the college-age Nora into a character in a play, later a movie, “Take Her, She’s Mine.” The lesson was not lost on Ms. Ephron, who seldom wrote about her own children but could make sparkling copy out of almost anything else: the wrinkles on her neck, her apartment, cabbage strudel, Teflon pans and the tastelessness of egg-white omelets.
She turned her painful breakup with her second husband, the Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein, into a best-selling novel, “Heartburn,” which she then recycled into a successful movie starring Jack Nicholson as a philandering husband and Meryl Streep as a quick-witted version of Ms. Ephron herself.
When Ms. Ephron was 4, her parents moved from New York to Beverly Hills, where she grew up, graduating from Beverly Hills High School in 1958. At Wellesley, she began writing for the school newspaper, and in the summer of 1961 she was a summer intern in the Kennedy White House. She said later that perhaps her greatest accomplishment there was rescuing the speaker of the house, Sam Rayburn, from a men’s room in which he had inadvertently locked himself. In an essay for The New York Times in 2003, she said she was also probably the only intern that President John F. Kennedy had never hit on.
After graduation from college in 1962, she moved to New York, a city she always adored, intent on becoming a journalist. Her first job was as a mail girl at Newsweek. (There were no mail boys, she later pointed out.) Soon she was contributing to a parody of The New York Post put out during the 1962 newspaper strike. Her piece of it earned her a tryout at The Post, where the publisher, Dorothy Schiff, remarked: “If they can parody The Post, they can write for it. Hire them.”
Ms. Ephron stayed at The Post for five years, covering stories like the Beatles, the Star of India robbery at the American Museum of Natural History, and a pair of hooded seals at the Coney Island aquarium that refused to mate.
“The Post was a terrible newspaper in the era I worked there,” she wrote, but added that the experience taught her to write short and to write around a subject, since the kinds of people she was assigned to cover were never going to give her much interview time.
In the late 1960s Ms. Ephron turned to magazine journalism, at Esquire and New York mostly. She quickly made a name for herself by writing frank, funny personal essays — about the smallness of her breasts, for example — and tart, sharply observed profiles of people like Ayn Rand, Helen Gurley Brown and the composer and best-selling poet Rod McKuen. Some of these articles were controversial. In one, she criticized Betty Friedan for conducting a “thoroughly irrational” feud with Gloria Steinem; in another, she discharged a withering assessment of Women’s Wear Daily.
But all her articles were characterized by humor and honesty, written in a clear, direct, understated style marked by an impeccable sense of when to deploy the punchline. (Many of her articles were assembled in the collections “Wallflower at the Orgy,” “Crazy Salad” and “Scribble Scribble.”)
Ms. Ephron made as much fun of herself as of anyone else. She was labeled a practitioner of the New Journalism, with its embrace of novelistic devices in the name of reaching a deeper truth, but she always denied the connection. “I am not a new journalist, whatever that is,” she once wrote. “I just sit here at the typewriter and bang away at the old forms.”
Ms. Ephron got into the movie business more or less by accident after her marriage to Mr. Bernstein in 1976. He and Bob Woodward, his partner in the Watergate investigation, were unhappy with William Goldman’s script for the movie version of their book “All the President’s Men,” so Mr. Bernstein and Ms. Ephron took a stab at rewriting it. Their version was ultimately not used, but it was a useful learning experience, she later said, and it brought her to the attention of people in Hollywood.
Her first screenplay, written with her friend Alice Arlen, was for “Silkwood,” a 1983 film based on the life of Karen Silkwood, who died under suspicious circumstances while investigating abuses at a plutonium plant where she had worked. Ms. Arlen was in film school then, and Ms. Ephron had scant experience writing for anything other than the page. But Mike Nichols, who directed the movie (which starred Ms. Streep and Kurt Russell), said that the script made an immediate impression on him. He and Ms. Ephron had become friends when she visited him on the set of “Catch-22.”
“I think that was the beginning of her openly falling in love with the movies,” Mr. Nichols said in an interview, “and she and Alice came along with ‘Silkwood’ when I hadn’t made a movie in seven years. I couldn’t find anything that grabbed me.” He added: “Nora was so funny and so interesting that you didn’t notice that she was also necessary. I think a lot of her friends and readers will feel that.”
Ms. Ephron followed “Silkwood” three years later with a screenplay adaptation of her own novel “Heartburn,” which was also directed by Mr. Nichols. But it was her script for “When Harry Met Sally,” which became a hit Rob Reiner movie in 1989 starring Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan, that established Ms. Ephron’s gift for romantic comedy and for delayed but happy endings that reconcile couples who are clearly meant for each other but don’t know it.
“When Harry Met Sally” is probably best remembered for Ms. Ryan’s table-pounding faked-orgasm scene with Mr. Crystal in Katz’s Delicatessen on the Lower East Side, prompting a middle-aged woman (played by Mr. Reiner’s mother, Estelle Reiner) sitting nearby to remark to her waiter, indelibly, “I’ll have what she’s having.”
The scene wouldn’t have gotten past the Hollywood censors of the past, but in many other respects Ms. Ephron’s films are old-fashioned movies, only in a brand-new guise. Her 1998 hit, “You’ve Got Mail,” for example, which she both wrote (with her sister Delia) and directed, is partly a remake of the old Ernst Lubitsch film ‘The Shop Around the Corner.”
Ms. Ephron began directing because she knew from her parents’ example how powerless screenwriters are (at the end of their careers both became alcoholics) and because, as she said in her Wellesley address, Hollywood had never been very interested in making movies by or about women. She once wrote, “One of the best things about directing movies, as opposed to merely writing them, is that there’s no confusion about who’s to blame: you are.”
Mr. Nichols said he had encouraged her to direct. “I knew she would be able to do it,” he recalled. “Not only did she have a complete comprehension of the process of making a movie — she simply soaked that up — but she had all the ancillary skills, the people skills, all the hundreds of things that are useful when you’re making a movie.”
Her first effort at directing, “This Is My Life” (1992), with a screenplay by Ms. Ephron and her sister Delia, based on a novel by Meg Wolitzer about a single mother trying to become a standup comedian, was a dud. But Ms. Ephron redeemed herself in 1993 with “Sleepless in Seattle” (she shared the screenwriting credits), which brought Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan together so winningly that they were cast again in “You’ve Got Mail.”
Among the other movies Ms. Ephron wrote and directed were “Lucky Numbers” (2000), “Bewitched” (2005) and, her last, “Julie & Julia” (2009), in which Ms. Streep played Julia Child.
She and Ms. Streep had been friends since they worked on “Silkwood” together. “Nora just looked at every situation and cocked her head and thought, ‘Hmmmm, how can I make this more fun?’ ” Ms. Streep wrote in an e-mail on Tuesday.
Ms. Ephron earned three Oscar nominations for best screenplay, for “Silkwood,” “Sleepless in Seattle” and “When Harry Met Sally.” But in all her moviemaking years she never gave up writing in other forms. Two essay collections, “I Feel Bad About My Neck: And Other Reflections on Being a Woman” (2006) and “I Remember Nothing” (2010), were both best sellers. With her sister Delia she wrote a play, “Love, Loss, and What I Wore,” about women and their wardrobes (once calling it “ ‘The Vagina Monologues’ without the vaginas”) and by herself she wrote “Imaginary Friends,” a play, produced in 2002, about the literary and personal quarrel between Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy.
She also became an enthusiastic blogger for The Huffington Post, writing on subjects like the Las Vegas mogul Steve Wynn’s accidentally putting a hole in a Picasso he owned and Ryan ONeal’s failing to recognize his own daughter and making a pass at her.
Several years ago, Ms. Ephron learned that she had myelodysplastic syndrome, a pre-leukemic condition, but she kept the illness a secret from all but a few intimates and continued to lead a busy, sociable life.
“She had this thing about not wanting to whine,” the writer Sally Quinn said on Tuesday. “She didn’t like self-pity. It was always, you know, ‘Suck it up.’ ”
Ms. Ephron’s first marriage, to the writer Dan Greenburg, ended in divorce, as did her marriage to Mr. Bernstein. In 1987 she married Nicholas Pileggi, the author of the books “Wiseguy”and “Casino.” (Her contribution to “Not Quite What I Was Planning: Six-Word Memoirs by Writers Famous and Obscure,” edited by Larry Smith, reads: “Secret to life, marry an Italian.”)
In addition to her son Jacob Bernstein, a journalist who writes frequently for the Styles section of The Times, Ms. Ephron is survived by Mr. Pileggi; another son, Max Bernstein, a rock musician; and her sisters Delia Ephron; Amy Ephron, who is also a screenwriter; and Hallie Ephron, a journalist and novelist.
In person Ms. Ephron — small and fine-boned with high cheeks and a toothy smile — had the same understated, though no less witty, style that she brought to the page.
“Sitting at a table with Nora was like being in a Nora Ephron movie,” Ms. Quinn said. “She was brilliant and funny.”
She was also fussy about her hair and made a point of having it professionally blow-dried twice a week. “It’s cheaper by far than psychoanalysis and much more uplifting,” Ms. Ephron said.
Another friend, Robert Gottlieb, who had edited her books since the 1970s, said that her death would be “terrible for her readers and her movie audience and her colleagues.” But “the private Nora was even more remarkable,” he added, saying she was “always there for you with a full heart plus the crucial dose of the reality principle.”
Ms. Streep called her a “stalwart.”
“You could call on her for anything: doctors, restaurants, recipes, speeches, or just a few jokes, and we all did it, constantly,” she wrote in her e-mail. “She was an expert in all the departments of living well.”
The producer Scott Rudin recalled that less than two weeks before her death, he had a long phone session with her from the hospital while she was undergoing treatment, going over notes for a pilot she was writing for a TV series about a bank compliance officer. Afterward she told him, “If I could just get a hairdresser in here, we could have a meeting.”
Ms. Ephron’s collection “I Remember Nothing” concludes with two lists, one of things she says she won’t miss and one of things she will. Among the “won’t miss” items are dry skin, Clarence Thomas, the sound of the vacuum cleaner, and panels on “Women in Film.” The other list, of the things she will miss, begins with “my kids” and “Nick” and ends this way:
“Taking a bath
Coming over the bridge to Manhattan
Paul Vitello contributed reporting.
24 June 2012Last updated at 17:04 GMT
By Andrew BensonChief F1 writer
Spain’s Fernando Alonso said his European Grand Prix win on Sunday was the most emotional of his career.
The Ferrari driver fought from 11th on the grid to win in Valencia on the same weekend the Spanish football team made it to the semi-finals of Euro 2012.
“The emotions are unique because for Spain it is a difficult time with economic problems,” he said.
“People made sacrifices to come here, and yesterday we felt sad because we did not give them what they wanted.”
The win was the 29th of the 30-year-old’s F1 career and it moved him into the championship lead, 20 points ahead of Red Bull’s Mark Webber.
The two drivers Alonso considers his biggest rivals – McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton and Red Bull’s Sebastian Vettel – both retired from the race.
Vettel had an alternator failure while leading and Hamilton was taken out in a collision with Williams’s Pastor Maldonado.
“One of the things that makes Alonso so good is that if he gets an opportunity to win, he will take it. That is exactly what happened in Valencia.”
But Alonso said re-taking the championship lead meant little with more than half the season still to go.
“I’m very happy,” he said. “But it’s the eighth race of 20, (so there is) nothing to be proud or excited about.
“We need to be honest with ourselves and our fans – yesterday we were out of Q3 and there were some people quicker than us but this win will have a big impact on the confidence of the people in Maranello (Ferrari’s base).
“It’s true that we believe and we will never give up, we will have confidence in ourselves and we will arrive with optimism at every grand prix we go to.
“But at the same time, apart from winning today or finishing sixth today, we know that we are not in the position that we want to be and there are a few cars quicker than us and we cannot be blind to that. We need to work.”
Alonso inherited the lead when Vettel retired on lap 34, and had been promoted to third place from fourth behind the safety car following the latest in a series of pit-stop problems for Hamilton this year.
But he won most of the other positions thanks to some audacious overtaking moves, relentlessly quick pace and a typically fast first pit stop from Ferrari.
His final passing move was the one that put him in a position to take the lead when Vettel retired – Alonso passed Lotus’s Romain Grosjean for second place around the outside of the first corner following the resumption of racing after a safety-car period.
“On the emotional side, I think this is the best victory, the emotions I felt on the podium there is nothing to compare,” Alonso said.
“On the driving side maybe we had better wins. We had some good overtaking manoeuvres with some guys but, with some retirements etc, we found the win in an easier way.
“Before the race we were thinking at the best to be fifth or sixth and score as many points as possible and not to lose too many points with the winners.
“I need to watch the race on TV because I don’t know how we were third behind the safety car – how we recovered so many positions – and then I need to look at the moment with Grosjean and then exactly what happened with Sebastian and Hamilton.”
He added: “You need to have the pace to overtake people. There were some overtaking manoeuvres we were lucky (with) because they were quite aggressive and we touched a bit and they can go either way.
“We [took] risks, we were aggressive, we had the pace and we were lucky.
Copyright 2012. BBCSPORT.com. All Rights Reserved
Post categories: Formula 1
Andrew Benson | 20:27 UK time, Monday, 25 June 2012
There was a certain inevitability, given the history of Michael Schumacher’s career, about the fact that his first podium finish since his comeback involved a degree of controversy.
In Valencia, Schumacher drove the latest in a series of strong races to finally deliver on the potential he has shown with Mercedes more or less since the start of the year.
In the end, the controversy was much ado about nothing – the man who is notorious for pushing the boundaries of acceptability did nothing wrong.
Red Bull’s Mark Webber reported to his team that Schumacher had his DRS overtaking aid, which boosts straight-line speed, open as they passed waved yellow caution flags late in the race.
The rules say a driver must slow down significantly for yellow flags; Schumacher did – case closed.
His third in the European Grand Prix has been a long time coming. It was Schumacher’s first podium finish since the 2006 Chinese Grand Prix, when he was driving for Ferrari, but it should arguably have happened already this season, by far his strongest since his comeback at the start of 2010 after three years in retirement.
In 2010 and 2011, Schumacher struggled compared to team-mate Nico Rosberg.
In the first year of his comeback, Schumacher was nowhere near him; by the second half of last year the two were evenly matched in races, but the younger man out-qualified the veteran 15-4 over the whole season.
This season, finally, has been different. On performance, there has been virtually nothing to choose between them in qualifying or races.
Each has scored a pole position - although Schumacher lost his in Monaco to a grid penalty - and only a dreadful reliability record on the seven-time champion’s car has stopped him scoring many more points than he has.
While Rosberg has completed every lap, Schumacher has finished only three races and of his five retirements only one has been his fault.
So where might a podium have come based on his performances prior to this one?
Schumacher was running third in Australia when he retired, but he would probably have finished fifth there. His tyre degradation was too severe to challenge Lewis Hamilton’s McLaren or hold off the Red Bulls of Sebastian Vettel and Webber, who filled the three places behind winner Jenson Button.
Mercedes think Schumacher would have gone on to finish second to a dominant Rosberg in China had he not retired immediately after his pit stop because a front wheel had not been fitted correctly.
But other teams believe the two McLarens would have beaten Schumacher and possibly the Red Bulls, too.
His pole lap in Monaco was particularly impressive and that would almost certainly have been converted into at least a podium finish. But first there was a five-place grid penalty for causing a crash in Spain, and then he retired from the race with a fuel-pressure failure.
When it finally came, the podium finish owed something to the unusual circumstances of the race and a lot to Hamilton being taken out by Williams’s Pastor Maldonado. But it would be hard to argue Schumacher didn’t deserve it on the balance of the year.
When he announced his comeback, he said he wanted to win another world title. But as soon as it became obvious from early in 2010 that he was going to struggle, he has always maintained that getting back on to the pace would be a long-term matter.
No-one expected it to take as long as it has. But perhaps that is to underestimate how much he lost in his three years away, his age – he is now 43 – and the incredible depth of talent in today’s field.
Schumacher is still some way short of the driver he once was, a man who could consistently dance on a limit beyond that of anyone else.
But taking this season on average, there is now virtually nothing to choose on pace between him and Rosberg – the one exception being China, where the younger man had the best part of half a second on his team-mate.
That, though, puts Mercedes in an intensely awkward position and facing a very difficult decision – because Schumacher’s contract runs out at the end of this year.
The problem is, good as Rosberg is, few outside Mercedes believe he is a match for the three towering talents of this generation – Fernando Alonso, Hamilton and Vettel.
Yet this is a team with aspirations to win the world title and some would argue they are putting themselves at an automatic disadvantage with their current driver line-up.
So do they offer Schumacher another contract on the basis of his improved performance, continue to benefit from the undoubted marketing benefits of his presence in the team as a driver and hope they can build a car that is better than a Red Bull, a McLaren and a Ferrari? Or do they go for someone else?
They are known to be interested in Hamilton, the only one of the big three who is potentially available to take his place.
But Hamilton may well not be available – he seems more likely to either stick with McLaren or to try to persuade Red Bull they should take him on given the reasonable possibility they could lose Vettel to Ferrari at the end of next year.
Yet how long can Mercedes expect Schumacher – who will be 44 next January – to be able to continue at this level?
In which case, should they gamble on a younger man who may represent the future, someone like the increasingly impressive Paul di Resta, for example, who just happens to be a Mercedes protege?
What would you do?
Copyright. 2012. BBCSPORT.com All Rights Reserved
Michael Jackson performs onstage in Kansas City during the Bad tour. By Bettmann/Corbis.
Everything went perfectly for Ferrari driver Fernando Alonso, allowing him to win the 2012 Grand Prix of Europe, while all his closest rivals hit trouble. The win meant Alonso was the first driver to win two races this season, and also pushed him to the top of the FIA Formula One Drivers’ standings after eight races. The win at the Valencia Street Circuit in Spain was Alonso’s twenty-ninth career win and the two-hundred and eighteenth victory for Ferrari.
Kimi Raikkonen finished second in the Lotus-Renault 6.4 seconds behind Alonso, while the Mercedes of Michael Schumacher finished third, a further 6.2 seconds behind.
Fernando Alonso
“It’s difficult to express in words,” said Alonso about his surprise win on home soil. “Today, we had an amazing race, amazing start, some good fights, I think I remember six or seven overtakings where it was very close, and we touched each other. I touched Grosjean in the restart. All of those little moments can go on the wrong side and you finish the race in the wall, or you can be the winner at the end. And today, we had all the good factors with us and the luck and we have to enjoy this.”
Pole-sitter Sebastian Vettel had looked to dominate the race. He had a great start, lead immediately and had built a gap at one point by as much as nineteen seconds. But problems hit his Red Bull-Renault, and he slowed to stop and retire on lap thirty-three.
“We’re not sure what happened,” said Vettel once he returned to the pits. “We lost drive and the engine just quit.”
A similar problem hit Raikkonen’s teammate Romain Grosjean. Grosjean had passed the McLaren-Mercedes of Lewis Hamilton early and was sitting in second behind Alonso after Vettel’s retirement. Then he too had the engine suddenly stop. The fact both these retirements were similar and both were Renault engines made most wonder if it was a problem inherent to the Renault, and potentially other cars could be affected. None were, however.
After Grosjean’s retirement, Lewis Hamilton was back running in second, but like all Alonso’s rivals, hit troubles. With his tires degrading in the last few laps, he was passed by Kimi Raikkonen, and then was challenged by the Williams-Renault of Pastor Maldonado. Hamilton, though, pushed Maldonado wide, and then did not give room for Maldonado at the next corner. The two collided; Hamilton hit the wall, and retired on the spot. Maldonado, somewhat strangely, was given a twenty-second penalty for the altercation after the race.
Hamilton, though, did not seem too upset about his retirement after the race.
“We lost some points today — fortunately, however, a couple of other drivers fighting at the front also missed out, so it’s not the end of the world,” he said. “It just makes things a little bit tougher. Today was just a bad day in the office — but that’s motor racing, and I’m already looking forward to the next Grand Prix, my home race at Silverstone.”
Kimi Raikkonen, however, did not have a bad day, and was generally competitive all race in his second-place finish.
“I had enough tires to get past Hamilton on, I think it was the second-last or third-last lap,” said Raikkonen. “We didn’t really have the speed to challenge for the win,” he added.
Photo by: motorsport.com All Rights Reserved
Third-place finisher Michael Schumacher was surprised to get to the podium, only learning he had finished third when he crossed the line.
“It was crossing the line that I asked my guys ‘where did we finish?’,” said Schumacher. “I saw Webber’s pit board and close to the end it showed him eighth and seventh and I knew I was one place ahead of that one. And then boys told me ‘that’s third, that’s podium’. I can’t believe that! It’s something I didn’t really expect.”
Schumacher, and fourth-placed Mark Webber had pitted later than most for their last set of tires, and had fresher rubber at the end, allowing them to gain some positions. Webber, incredibly, had started nineteenth on the grid, and drove well to climb up to fourth.
Webber said, “I’m very happy with that, obviously it’s been a tough weekend up until today, but you never know what’s going to happen. In the middle of the race I wasn’t too happy and I didn’t really know what was going on. Then there was a bit of attrition at the front and the strategy worked out.”
The finish moved Webber up to second in the championship, with 91 points, twenty behind Alonso’s tally of 111.
Photo by: Motorsport 2012 .com All Rights Reserved
Behind Webber was the first of the Force India cars, with Nico Hulkenberg followed by the other Nico — Nico Rosberg, who finished sixth in the other Mercedes.
The second Force India of Paul di Resta was seventh, and he was unique in doing a one-stop race, but felt his race was hurt by the safety car period.
“We went very aggressive by only stopping once and in fact we were the only car to pull off this strategy,” he said. “Of course, when you’re stopping once you really don’t want a safety car period and it certainly hurt my race and cost me some track position.”
Behind di Resta, in eighth was the McLaren of Jenson Button who has had his struggles recently.
“This was a really difficult race to read,” said Button. “I got a poor start, was boxed in at Turn One, and had to lift to prevent Fernando [Alonso] and myself hitting the wall at Turn Two. I don’t think we did a bad job in terms of strategy — the car felt good and kept improving during the race — but, when the Safety Car was deployed, I think a few others lucked in to a better strategy. And, today, also, we just didn’t get lucky.”
Ninth-place finisher was Sauber driver Sergio Perez, and the final point position went to the Williams-Renault of Bruno Senna, who benefited from his teammate Maldonado’s twenty second penalty. Maldonado thus finished twelfth, behind the Toro Rosso of Daniel Ricciardo.
The rest of classified finishers were Vitaly Petrov and Heikki Kovalainen in the two Caterhams, Charles Pic in the Marussia, Felipe Massa in the second Ferrari, then the two HRT cars of Pedro de La Rosa.
Alonso now takes his championship lead, as mentioned, to Lewis Hamilton’s home track, at Silverstone in England for the British Grand Prix. “We will do all we can to win this championship. But we still don’t have the quickest car and we must push to reach this objective as quickly as possible.”
The race takes place on July 8th.
NASA via Twitpic
NASA astronaut Ron Garan looks into the camera from outside the International Space Station in July 2011. “Knocking on the door to come back in #FromSpace after yesterday’s spacewalk,” Garan wrote on Twitpic.
You might think it’s cool enough that NASA astronaut Ron Garan has spent months aboard the International Space Station, but he’s become even better-known as a social-media maven. This month he passed the 2 million mark for Google+ circles, putting him at No. 21 on the Google+ Top 100. His Fragile Oasis postings are a highlight on the Web, Facebook and Twitter. His “Ask Me Anything” exchange with Reddit users went so well he’s thinking of doing it again.
So what’s the secret to his success? It’s really not a secret at all: He’s got a good story to share, about the beauty and fragility of planet Earth.
The 50-year-old New York native is a former Air Force fighter pilot who has degrees in business economics and aerospace engineering. He joined the astronaut corps in 2000, and his training for spaceflight included a turn as an “aquanaut” for NASA’s NEEMO underwater research mission in 2006. Garan has been up in space twice — in 2008, on the shuttle Discovery to help deliver Japan’s Kibo lab to the International Space Station; and just last year for a nearly six-month tour of duty on the station.
Garan says another stint on the space station is “always a possibility, down the road.” But right now, he’s focusing on NASA’s Open Government Initiative, which aims to build stronger collaborative ties between government, industry and the general public. That means social engagement isn’t just something he does in his spare time. It’s part of his job.
During a recent interview, Garan talked about how he became a super-social spaceman, and what he’s learned from the adventure. Here are some edited excerpts of the Q&A:
Cosmic Log: When you come into contact with the public, what do you find they’re most curious about?
Garan: ”Well, what they’re most curious about is the basic question of what life is like, living in space. It really is a marvelous experience. It’s very interesting in a lot of respects — and probably the greatest part about it is that it gave me an incredible sense of appreciation for what we have here on our planet. Everything from just simple things that define the beauty of life on our planet — the breeze in your face, and the smell of flowers, watching a flock of birds and a million other things. After you’re up there for a while, those are things that you really start to miss.
“I had the opportunity to have a short-duration flight on the space shuttle Discovery back in 2008, during which I was up there for two weeks, and then a long-term one where I was up for five and a half months. And it’s a very different experience. You have the same views, you have the same environment that you live in. But being able to see the earth, day in and day out, and watch the earth change … and to really start to miss some of the things that I took for granted, that really gives you that appreciation.”
Ron Garan / NASA
A fish-eye view of the International Space Station, captured by Ron Garan last July, features the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer in the foreground. A Russian Progress cargo ship and a Soyuz crew capsule are docked on the left end of the station. The structure extending to the left of the AMS is a thermal radiator. One of the station’s gold-colored solar arrays is visible in the background. And off to the right, the shuttle Atlantis is docked to the station’s Tranquility module.
Q: So how did the Fragile Oasis website enter into the mix?
A: ”That came out of my shuttle mission in 2008. I had a little bit of frustration. I imagine it’s like when you go to the Grand Canyon, and you’re there by yourself, and you sit there at the rim of the Grand Canyon and you’re looking out over this amazing thing. And imagine that very, very few people have been able to have that experience. For me, at least, that would be frustrating, and the experience would not be as rich as it would be if I had the opportunity to share that with people. So I was frustrated during my shuttle mission that I couldn’t share the experience.
“When I got assigned to my long-duration mission, there’s two and a half years of training, and during that two and a half years, I really brainstormed how I could do that. We came up with Fragile Oasis, not just to have it as a website where we could tell stories about space, but the goal was always to provide a platform for people to follow along on the mission, not as spectators but as fellow crew members. To have an interactive way to do it.
“We had some significant technical challenges in getting that thing off the ground, and it’s still a work in progress. It doesn’t have a lot of the interactive features that we wanted it to have, but we’re working on it. When I launched to the International Space Station, and I had the five and a half months up there, I really was very thankful that I had this tool, this platform, to be able to communicate. And in the meantime, we had the exponential increase in the popularity of social media tools.
“First I did Facebook, but I didn’t see that as a public outreach tool. I saw that as a way to connect with old friends, and I was just using it on a personal basis. On the other hand, I started Twitter for one reason: I saw it as a way to do education outreach. I could say, I’m learning about this experiment we’re going to be doing in space, and I’d put a link on there to the experiment’s website and the science behind it. I saw that as a very powerful way to do outreach. I now see the benefits of outreach in other platforms as well, including Facebook and obviously Google+. In the case of Google+, I see a very robust mechanism to share the space program and the experience of living in space with a lot of interactive features on that platform.”
Q: With all your experience in social media, do you find that you favor one tool over the other? From your comments, it sounds as if you’re seeing some differentiation in how those different tools can be used. Particularly with Google+, you just recently passed the 2-million-follower mark. That must be one of the big successes for your efforts.
A: ”Well, I think all the platforms offer slightly different tools to tell the story. I think they all fit together really well, actually. So it’s not a ‘one-platform’ type of message. We want to reach the broadest audience we can, because the excitement of spaceflight is global. It’s for all humanity. So the more tools we can use to tell that story, and the more people we can get involved with the story, the better off the whole message will be.”
Q: Did you have to do a selling job with NASA to do the sorts of things you’re doing?
A: ”It took a while to catch on, but it’s catching on now across the board. We realize the benefit of social media. I’m on some social-media committees now, on some working groups to help not only crew members and astronauts, but also thousands of other people who work in the space program. They have a very compelling story as well. We’re trying to find the best way to get that story out. And what we’re finding is that just letting people tell their story in the way they want to tell it is the best way to do it.
“Obviously, there have to be guidelines. But the more leeway we can give people in the space program to tell their story, the richer the experience will be, both for the people who are reading it and for the people who are doing it. That’s one of the cardinal rules here, to give people as much leeway as we possibly can.”
Q: Are there any guidelines or favorites that you want to pass along to people who want to be closer in touch with the space adventure?
A: ”Oh, yeah. There are tons and tons of people. Most of the astronauts who fly in space right now have Twitter accounts. They’re all on there. There’s also @NASA_Astronauts, where we try to retweet, as best we can, everything from all the astronauts. There’s @NASA, the official Twitter account. There’s the Facebook version, and soon the Google+ version of all these as well. There’s commercial spaceflight: @SpaceX has a social media presence. There are people outside the space agency who are involved in telling the story as well, such as @YurisNight and #spacetweeps.
“What we’re finding through this is that it’s not just the official word from NASA, the European Space Agency and the Japanese space agency. There are citizen scientists and all these other groups that have formed around the idea of space exploration, and they really do a great job of telling the story as well. It’s obvious that there’s a lot of passion and heart and soul that’s put into this.”
Q: Is there something about the space story that particularly resonates with social media?
A: ”I think it’s because it’s a human endeavor, and throughout the 50 years of human spaceflight, it’s always been a select few people who have gotten to fly in space, and we’ve relied on them to come back and tell us what it was like. Now, through technology and through these new platforms, we can bring people along with us on the missions and have them experience this is real time. You can see example after example of this.
“An easy example is, if one of us sends out a tweet with a picture, let’s say, and we misidentify the geographic location, we’re going to find out about that pretty fast. That happened to me on my mission, and I thanked the person who brought that to my attention. I started sending pictures to that person first, to make sure I got it right. We don’t have a lot of time up there, and all the pictures and all the social media that we do is in our free time. So to have people on the ground, crowdsourcing or open-sourcing or however you want to put it, that really empowers us to do more. It makes communication much more effective.”
Q: Have you ever thought if it would be possible to boil down the glory of space down into one tweet? Is there any elevator talk you’ve thought about giving in 140 characters, about what it’s like to fly in space?
A: ”You’d need at least 147 characters to do that … no. I know I couldn’t do it. That would be a pretty remarkable feat.”
Q: What’s the one thing that you’d like people to know about spaceflight.
A: ”In 140 characters?”
Q: Not 140 characters, but what’s the one biggest message that you think the space experience provides for people on Earth?
A: ”Well, to go back to the reason we started Fragile Oasis: The really compelling reason is that we wanted to use this perspective we have on the planet to inspire people to go out and make a difference, and make the world a better planet. The one gift that I think we get when we fly in space is this perspective.
“You don’t necessarily have to be in space to get this perspective, but being in space really reinforces it: You see how fragile the planet is. You see how beautiful it is, how peaceful it looks. Then you realize that life is not as beautiful for everybody on the planet as it looks from space. That’s a very compelling thing to experience, and hopefully it serves as a call to action, to not accept the status quo and make life on the planet as beautiful as it looks. That’s the No. 1 thing that I want to get across.”
NASA
The International Space Station looks like little more than a speck with solar panels in this picture, which was taken from the shuttle Atlantis during its approach on July 10. A first-quarter moon shines on the right side of the frame.
Where in the Cosmos
Garan and his colleagues at Fragile Oasis offer a cornucopia of outer-space imagery and blog postings, including this picture of the International Space Station and the moon, as seen from the shuttle Atlantis during its approach for docking last July. The photo served as today’s quiz picture in the “Where in the Cosmos” contest, presented weekly on the Cosmic Log Facebook page.
Len Whitney’s comment was my favorite: “I believe it’s a TIE fighter … but those are short-range fighters, we’re too far out in space … Must have taken off from that moon … Wait a second … that’s no moon!!!! It’s a space station!”
For figuring out so quickly that the picture showed a moon anda space station, I’m sending 3-D glasses to Facebook followers Matt Jaworski and Lawrence Johnson. I’m also reserving a pair for Whitney. To make sure you’re in on next week’s contest, click the “like” button on the Cosmic Log Facebook page and join the alliance. It’s not a trap!
More about NASA and social media:
Although Ron Garan is the highest-rated astronaut on the Google+ list, props also deserve to go out to Mike Massimino, the first NASA astronaut to tweet from space and NASA’s top astronaut when it comes to Twitter rankings.
Alan Boyle is msnbc.com’s science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by “liking” the log’s Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out “The Case for Pluto,” my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds
![]() Flickr / rodolpho.reis Zombies |
The use of a hallucinogen tied to a recent cannibal attack has skyrocketed in recent years.
That drug, known as bath salts, has reportedly been linked to some pretty crazy behavior – including the face-eating attack in Miami.
But how did this drug get so popular?
Is it even on the DEA’s radar, and who takes it?
We have the low-down on the apparently crazy-making drug.
The main ingredient in the designer drug marketed as bath salts – methylenedioxypyrovalerone – was first synthesized in 1969 and was totally legal in most states until recently.
That drug, known as MDVP, has been used as an appetite suppressant and to treat chronic fatigue syndrome, according to a March 2010 background paper prepared by officials at the Drug Enforcement Administration.
MDVP can boost users’ sex drives but can also make them anxious, the DEA said. A white or tan powder, the substance begins to stink if it’s left in open air.
In 2009, MDVP began showing up in the U.S. by way of China and India as part of a designer party drug called “bath salts,” according to the DEA.
While users typically snort it or take it in pill form, bath salts can be smoked or injected. The drug, which the DEA likened to LSD, can also cause chest pains, nose bleeds, sweating, and nausea.
The DEA had also linked the drug to suicide, homicide and self-inflicted wounds.
In February 2011, the DEA’s New York division launched a special task force to crack down on on the drug.
The task force eventually arrested 10 people who allegedly sold the bath salts at retailers in Manhattan and Brooklyn, one of which was apparently a tattoo parlor.
“Let this be a message to not only those who sell this poison but to those who abuse ‘bath salts’ that this road leads to a dead end,” DEA agent John Gilbride said after the arrests.
New Jersey introduced a bill to ban the sale of the MVDP in March 2011 after Rutgers University student Pamela Schmidt was allegedly beaten and killed by a boyfriend high on “bath salts.”
The now-controversial drug had previously been freely available in convenience stores, the Star-Ledger reported after the bill was introduced.
“Bath salts” were linked to self-mutilation, violence, hallucinations and extreme paranoia back in March 2011, the Star-Ledger reported.
Pamela Schmidt’s long-time boyfriend, William Parisio, had been high on bath salts and “paranoid like you wouldn’t believe” before her death, his mother told 1010 WINS back in March 2011.
By September 2011, at least 32 other states had taken steps to ban or control the substance, according to the DEA.
In July 2011, The New York Times reported that hospitals had noticed an alarming number of patients high on bath salts, which was legal in many states at the time.
The most disturbing incidents included a man who broke into a Pennsylvania monastery and stabbed a priest and a West Virginia woman who tore off her own skin, the Times reported.
“She looked like she had been dragged through a briar bush for several miles,” one doctor told the paper.
Yet another doctor said some people who did bath salts “aren’t right for a long time.”
The DEA said in September 2011 that it was using its authority to temporarily control MDVP and related stimulants amid increasing fears over the dangers of bath salts.
That action made it illegal for one year to possess MDVP while the agency decided whether it should be permanently controlled.
MDVP-containing drugs, sold as “plant food” or “bath salts,” could cause violent episodes, the DEA said.
In May 2011, a West Virginia man claiming to be high on bath salts reportedly stabbed a neighbor’s goat to death while wearing women’s underwear.
A pornographic magazine was lying near the pygmy goat, which belonged to a 4-year-old child, The Daily News reported at the time.
In late May 2012, Rudy Eugene, 31, was reportedly high on bath salts when he chewed off the face of a 65-year-old homeless man.
The homeless man, Ronald Poppo, survived the attack on a Miami highway even though police said Eugene gnawed his face off down to his goatee.
Needless to say, the so-called “Miami Cannibal” drew more attention to the drug, and the apparently bizarre behavior it causes.
Later in May 2012, the U.S. Senate voted to officially ban bath salts along with synthetic marijuana, sending the measure to the U.S. House of Representatives.
The legislation would ban MDVP, sold under the street names Tranquility, Zoom, Ivory Wave, Red Dove and Vanilla Sky, the Associated Press reported on May 31.
“Let this be a warning to those who make a profit manufacturing and selling killer chemical components to our teens and children: the jig is up,” Sen. Chuck Schumer said at the time.
* Copyright © 2012 Business Insider, Inc. All rights reserved.
Peter Brant II, left, 18, and Harry Brant, 15, omnipresent on the New York social scene, were in SoHo recently hosting an Interview party for the Jitrois clothing label.
The Brants are staples of Patrick McMullan party photos. Harry with his mother, Stephanie Seymour, at a fashion show.
ON a Thursday evening last month, Harry Brant and Peter Brant II sat on the stoop outside the Jitrois boutique in SoHo. In a cross-platform coup, they were hosting an Interview magazine fete for the clothing label, a new advertiser.
It was the brothers’ first promotional gig for Interview and a savvy foray in utilizing their increasing fame. They were decked out in Jitrois jeans (leather for Peter, denim for Harry). Peter’s outfit was rounded out with an Armani shirt. His slicked-back pomaded hair accentuated his strong-jawed model looks. Harry was working a designer armed forces look in a Louis Vuitton military jacket and Saint Laurent combat boots. Harry’s style has evolved.
“I used to only wear overalls, Alaïa T-shirts and my mom’s Manolo Blahnik loafers,” he said. “That was my uniform.”
Harry, 15, and his 18-year-old brother are the well-spoken product of cross-pollination of the Übermenschen. Their father, Peter M. Brant, is the industrialist, art collector, polo enthusiast and publisher of Interview. Their mother is the supermodel Stephanie Seymour.
Both are wisp thin. Peter’s deadpan, detached demeanor contrasts with Harry’s livelier, impish quality, a witty rejoinder ever ready. The Brant brood is rounded out by a younger sister and an older brother in college, plus five half-siblings from Mr. Brant’s previous marriage to Sandra Brant, but Peter and Harry are the nearest in age and have always been close.
Despite their youth, the boys are omnipresent on the social scene and staples of Patrick McMullan party photographs. Their every move is tracked on assorted fashion blogs. Earlier this year, Refinery29 touted, “Meet NYC’s Most Beautiful Teenage Brothers.” Their comings and goings are chronicled on the New York magazine blog The Cut.
“Everybody loves celebrity children,” said Stephanie Trong, the editorial director of The Cut. “But perhaps the biggest appeal is that these guys live in the lap of luxury and they’re extremely open about their exploits. How many teens go to couture shows or fashion parties, much less document them on their joint Twitter feed, in such a hilarious, uncensored way?”
The Brants have almost 70,000 Twitter followers, a fraction of whom appear to be their age.
“Most of my tweets happen between 1 and 5 in the morning,” Harry said. “I’m a night owl, and random thoughts pop into my head. I’ll be watching ‘Mommie Dearest,’ and I’ll be like, ‘Oh, my God, Joan Crawford is amazing.’ ”
This sets off a film tangent.
“ ‘Cocktail’ is the best movie of all time,” Peter said.
“You hate ‘Troop Beverly Hills,’ but you love ‘Cocktail?’ ” Harry countered. “You are a tacky European man!”
But this was a brief low-culture aside. For a teenager, Peter Brant can sound like a been-there-done-that dowager countess, not that his Old World pretensions aren’t refreshing in the Internet age.
“I’m interested in 18th-century furniture, late-19th-century art, the Arts and Crafts movement and history of the mid- to late-19th century,” he said. “I bounce around a lot, but I usually stick with the same three centuries.”
Harry has similarly lofty passions. “I become obsessed with things like DNA or old Valentino shows or the Qing dynasty,” he said. “I have a love of opulence.”
Peter interjected, “He gets that from me.”
Harry admitted, “I definitely learned that from you.”
The brothers, who live with their family in Greenwich, Conn., seem well on their way to transitioning from Internet to general fame — all for just being … well, fabulous. They are the perfect harbingers of the “It boy,” young enough that it isn’t emasculating that they don’t yet have jobs, and fashion-forward enough that they don’t water down their straight-from-the-runway looks.
It could be said that the Brants have taken the torch from the Hilton sisters, that they are the next generation of to-the-manner-born siblings in the public eye.
But Paris Hilton’s catchphrase (if you can remember) was “That’s hot.” Peter Brant name-checks Edith Wharton and Henry James. In a pop-culture landscape that has been populated by heir heads (any entertainment produced by the Hilton sisters or the Tinsley Mortimer reality show, “High Society,” which was about as classy as the skin magazine that shared its title), the Brants could certainly elevate the medium. But don’t expect the boys to be reality fodder in the near future.
“That’s where I draw the line,” said their father, Peter M. Brant. “That’s not going down on my nickel. It’s not their cup of tea, either, but they have been approached.”
Mr. Brant is baffled by the public’s growing obsession with his sons. “I have no idea,” he said. “I try to discourage their making their private lives public. They’re both good kids, and I’m proud of them.”
He thinks they are handling their increasing public stature with poise. “We’ve given them reasonable freedom,” he said, “and expect them to get to school on time. We expect them to be good human beings and to care about other things besides clothes.”
The writer-about-town Derek Blasberg, who has taken the brothers under his wing, can often be spotted with them. “For all their evening proclivities, they go home at a reasonable hour,” Mr. Blasberg said. “I’ve never seen them — How shall I put this? — drunk and disorderly. I’ve been out when Stephanie has dropped them off and Petey’s father has picked them up.”
The Brants attended Mr. Blasberg’s recent birthday hoedown in a barn in St. Louis. “Those boys were the first ones on the dance floor in their chaps and cowboy hats,” he said. “They’re not snobby. They can have fun anywhere from the Venice Biennial to a hayride.” And, no, it was not as if two zany teenagers had infiltrated the party.
“They were raised surrounded by adults,” Mr. Blasberg went on. “They are fully aware of who their father is, and what art they have on their walls, and who their mother is, and what she represents in terms of fashion and glamour. Naïve teenagers these boys are not.”
The Brant brothers’ ability to stay even-keeled and roll with 40-year-olds is a byproduct of a childhood spent at gallery openings and art dinners with their parents. “It trained us how to make conversation and how to behave,” Harry said.
Peter added: “Art people like to talk about little else than art, so you have to be able to keep up. A conversation about art always turns into a conversation about fashion, and a conversation about fashion always leads to art.”
Those events were a gateway to socializing at adult events solo. “I first started going out with a friend of mine, Nick Hissom, who is a model,” Peter said. “We always went out in threes, me and him and a girlfriend to adult parties. But I was still with a bunch of kids when I went. A lot of times we weren’t invited, but we snuck in or found a way onto the guest list. We just started doing it more often, and Harry would go out with me. The people I hang out with at parties I have known since I was growing up. It’s like hanging out with your uncle or aunt at a party.”
The brothers insist that their filled-to-the-brim social calendars don’t interfere with their studies. Peter finished high school in January and is majoring in art history at Hunter. Harry, who will be a sophomore, said, “Come rain or shine, I will be going to school at 6 a.m. whether I’ve gotten one hour of sleep or 10.”
And, yes, Peter did go to the prom, and they squeeze in normal activities one would find more age appropriate. Besides getting an early start at philanthropy by serving on the committee of Gabrielle’s Angel Foundation, a blood-cancer research charity, he is spending the summer interning at Sotheby’s. “Besides delivering mail, I help with appraisals and circa dating,” he said. Harry is interning in Interview’s advertising department.
“I’ve had a summer job since I was 9,” Harry said. “At our house we have stables, so I’d work in the barn. We had to clean the stalls.” Harry doesn’t share his father’s passion for polo. “I think horses are beautiful, and I respect them aesthetically,” he said, “but I can’t play polo like he does. It’s a demanding sport.”
Plans for their careers are up in the air. Harry knows that he wants to work in some sort of creative field, and Peter is leaning toward luxury goods, but isn’t sure.
“I’m young and have a lot of time and can sit on that question,” Harry said, before casting a comical sneer at his older brother. “But Peter, you have to hurry. You’re old candy. You’re withering away.”
Ever blasé, Peter tilted his head, looked at him blankly, then turned away, showing off his strong profile.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: June 21, 2012
An earlier version of this article incorrectly refereed to the Brant brothers’ siblings from their father’s earlier marriage to Sandra Brandt as stepsiblings. They are half-siblings.
Copyright. 2012. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved
Recent Comments