Month: June 2012

  • Practice Two – Hamilton heads Ferrari duo in Canada08 Jun 2012

    Lewis Hamilton (GBR) McLaren MP4-27. Formula One World Championship, Rd7, Canadian Grand Prix, Practice Day, Montreal, Canada, Friday, 8 June 2012Having set an early fast time, Fernando Alonso pushes too hard and spinsKamui Kobayashi's Sauber grounds out on the bumpy Circuit Gilles Villeneuve Bruno Senna loses control of his Williams and hits the so-called 'Wall of Champions'The brakes on Narain Karthikeyan's HRT glow red after the restart

    Lewis Hamilton maintained the upper hand after Friday’s second practice session at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve on Montreal’s Ile Notre Dame. Having lapped in 1m 15.564s in the morning to beat Red Bull’s Sebastian Vettel by 0.118s, he trimmed that to 1m 15.259s to beat Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso by 0.054s in the afternoon.

    Right behind the Spaniard, who lapped in 1m 15.313s, Felipe Massa maintained his upswing from Monaco with 1m 15.410s for third fastest time. All three used the super-soft Pirellis, whereas Vettel set his fourth best 1m 15.531s on the soft compound, boding well for qualifying tomorrow. The world champion did the most laps of the session, with 44 – one more that Hamilton.

    Fifth fastest time for Paul di Resta underpinned Force India’s hopes of a strong race, as the Scot lapped in 1m 15.544s to hold off Sauber’s Kamui Kobayashi on 1m 15.651s. Michael Schumacher was hot on his heels as Mercedes’ lead runner, with 1m 15.697s and then came Di Resta’s team mate Nico Hulkenberg on 1m 15.799s.

    Jenson Button, like Di Resta, put in one of the performances of the session by taking ninth place with 1m 15.812s, despite sitting out most of the morning and 70 minutes of the afternoon as McLaren fixed the oil leak on his car. This took much longer than anticipated after an oil leak on to the clutch was fixed, only for another leak to manifest itself which required further dismantling.

    The top 10 was rounded off by Nico Rosberg in the second Mercedes with 1m 15.878s, just ahead of Sergio Perez who took his Sauber round 1m 15.898s. Mark Webber was 12th in the second Red Bull on 1m 15.907s, with Pastor Maldonado breathing down his neck in the lead Williams with 1m 15.987s.

    It was a quiet day for Lotus, with Romain Grosjean 14th on 1m 16.360s and Kimi Raikkonen 15th on 1m 16.562s, but they are happy with their race pace.

    Heikki Kovalainen made up for his accident this morning with 1m 16.981s, which left his Caterham 16th. 

    This time it was Bruno Senna’s turn to bring out the red flags after he backed his Williams into the so-called ‘Champion’s Wall’ – where the likes of Jacques Villeneuve, Michael Schumacher and Sebastian Vettel have previously come to grief – on the exit to the final corner. Like Kovalainen in the morning, only the Brazilian’s pride was hurt, but the car was a mess that took marshals 13 minutes to clear up. His 1m 17.022s left him 17th, just ahead of Vitaly Petrov who took the second Caterham round in 1m 17.075s.

    Behind them, Jean-Eric Vergne headed Toro Rosso team mate Daniel Ricciardo, with 1m 17.124s to 1m 17.716s, while Pedro de la Rosa again put the HRT ahead of the Marussias with 1m 18.908s for 21st. That left Timo Glock 22nd on 1m 19.084s with Narain Karthikeyan on 1m 19.378s and Charles Pic bringing up the rear on 1m 19.902s.

    Besides Senna’s incident there were plenty of off-road adventures; Glock and Alonso both spun, while Webber, Di Resta, De la Rosa, Alonso and Hamilton all strayed off the grey stuff without damage.

     

    © 2012 Formula One World Championship Limited

  • How has Xanga changed or impacted your life?

    Xanga has changed my Life in so many ways that I can readily recognize, and I am sure in many ways that I cannot imagine or understand, even as they are happening in a slow and imperceptible way, and thus the changes are taking place, but how and what forces combine within Facebook to make these changes happen, I do not completely understand.

     

    In the identifiable ways, the most concrete way is that xanga has given me a way to securely archive much of the what I have experienced in my Life over the last decade. My Blog entries serve as an informal type of personal diary, that I have carefully accumulated over these years. 

     

    In many ways, I think that xanga has improved my writing skills, because even though the overwhelming percentage of what I have posted on my xanga Blog has been articles, clippings, photographs, reports, etc. which have been shared from other news sources, or writers,I still read more than I would without xanga.

     

    It is a confidence boost when you start out having no one ever acknowledge that you are even alive here, to having 2000+ visitors per week. Just one person acknowledging something I have posted encourages me to continue, and tells me I may be on the right track, or at least not alone on the wrong track.

       

    I just answered this Featured Question; you can answer it too!

  • Earth may be near tipping point, scientists warn

     Emissions

    A coal power station in Gelsenkirchen, Germany. (Martin Meissner / Associated Press / June 8, 2012)

     

     

     

     

    By Bettina Boxall, Los Angeles Times

    June 7, 20127:46 p.m.

    A group of international scientists is sounding a global alarm, warning that population growth, climate change and environmental destruction are pushing Earth toward calamitous — and irreversible — biological changes.

    In a paper published in Thursday’s edition of the journalNature, 22 researchers from a variety of fields liken the human impact to global events eons ago that caused mass extinctions, permanently altering Earth’s biosphere.

    “Humans are now forcing another such transition, with the potential to transform Earth rapidly and irreversibly into a state unknown in human experience,” wrote the authors, who are from the U.S., Europe, Canada and South America.

    If current trends continue — exploding global population, rapidly rising temperatures and the clearance of more than 40% of Earth’s surface for urban development or agriculture — the planet could reach a tipping point, they say.

    “The net effects of what we’re causing could actually be equivalent to an asteroid striking the Earth in a worst-case scenario,” the paper’s lead author, Anthony Barnosky, a professor of integrative biology at UC Berkeley, said in an interview. “I don’t want to sound like Armageddon. I think the point to be made is that if we just ignore all the warning signs of how we’re changing the Earth, the scenario of losses of biodiversity — 75% or more — is not an outlandish scenario at all.”

    Global population just passed 7 billion and is expected to reach 9.3 billion or more by 2050. “By the year 2070, we’ll live in a hotter world than it’s been since humans evolved as a species,” Barnosky said.

    Increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels is making the ocean more acidic, and less hospitable to sea life. By midcentury, humans could have altered more than half the world’s land surface.

    The swiftness of climate change is likely to outpace the ability of species to adapt, especially as natural habitat becomes more fragmented, Barnosky said.

    All this could produce a biologically impoverished Earth that would rob humans of vital ecological services such as insects that pollinate crops, forests that provide clean water, and tropical species that are the source of new drugs.

    “We have created a bubble of human population and economy … that is totally unsustainable and is either going to have to deflate gradually or is going to burst,” said co-author James Brown, a distinguished professor of biology at the University of New Mexico. “If it’s going to burst, the consequences are really going to be grim for people as well as biodiversity and the rest of the planet.”

    Forty years ago, the Club of Rome think tank caused a stir when it argued that there were limits to world growth. In 1968, Paul Ehrlich, now a professor of population studies at Stanford University, warned of the dangers of overpopulation in his book “The Population Bomb.”

    “This is what scientists saw in the ’60s and ’70s,” said Mikael Fortelius, a professor of evolutionary paleontology at the University of Helsinki in Finland and one of the paper’s authors. “We’ve never been quite sure when it would happen. We’re there now.”

    Human influence on the planet has become so pervasive that some scientists have argued in recent years that Earth has entered a new geologic epoch, the Anthropocene.

    Predicting the timing and exact nature of sweeping planetary change is difficult because of the complexity of biotic systems.

    “We may have already passed the tipping point or we may not get an early warning” that it is near, said co-author Alan Hastings, an ecologist and distinguished professor in UC Davis’ environmental science department.

    The authors got the idea for their review at a 2010 UC Berkeley conference devoted to the concept of a global tipping point.

    They looked at evidence of past dramatic shifts in Earth’s biosphere, such as the end of the last glacial age, when ice disappeared from nearly a third of the planet’s surface, or the lethal changes in the atmosphere that accompanied periods of intense volcanic activity. The consequences usually included mass species extinction, altered food webs and the emergence of new dominant species.

    To avert a grim future, or at least make it less grim, the paper calls for significant reductions in world population growth and per-capita resource use, more efficient energy use, less reliance on fossil fuels and stepped-up efforts to protect the parts of Earth that have so far escaped human dominance.

    “I’m not personally particularly optimistic,” Fortelius said. “I think we had to speak up. We have to say what we see. Whether it will have any impact, I really don’t know.”

    bettina.boxall@latimes.com

    Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times

     

     

  • Donald Trump plans to sue Miss Pennsylvania for making the “false charge.”

    In this photo provided by the Miss Universe Organization, Miss Pennsylvania Sheena Monnin competes during the 2012 Miss USA Presentation Show on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Miss Universe Organization, Darren Decker

     

    (AP) The Miss USA pageant representative from Pennsylvania resigned her crown claiming the contest is rigged, but according to organizers the beauty queen was upset over the decision to allow transgender contestants to enter.

     

    A posting on Miss Pennsylvania Sheena Monnin’s Facebook page claims another contestant learned the names of the top 5 finishers on Sunday morning – hours before the show was broadcast.

     

    Pictures: Miss Universe 2012 pageant
    Pictures: Miss Universe 2012 contestants

     

    Monnin claims the other contestant told her the names of the top 5 she spotted on a planning sheet for the telecast – and she decided to step down as soon as those same contestants were named during the show.

     

    “In my heart I believe in honesty, fair play, a fair opportunity, and high moral integrity, none of which in my opinion are part of this pageant system any longer,” Monnin wrote in one of her Facebook posts.

     

     

       

     

     

    Monnin, of Cranberry, Butler County, did not immediately respond to a Facebook message from The Associated Press.

     

    Donald Trump, who runs the Miss Universe Organization, called Monnin’s claims that the pageant was fixed “totally ridiculous” in a live interview Wednesday on ABC’s “Good Morning America” and said the pageant organization plans to sue Monnin for making the “false charge.”

     

    “We’re going to be suing her now. She made a very false charge and she knows it’s a false charge,” Trump said.

     

    Pageant organizers confirmed Monnin resigned, but said it wasn’t for the reason she claimed.

     

    According to a statement from the Miss Universe Organization, the contestant who Monnin claimed saw the sheet vehemently refuted Monnin’s account.

     

    The statement includes text from an email organizers said Monnin sent citing the decision to allow natural born males into the competition as the reason she’s resigning.

     

    A transgender contestant was initially denied entry to the Miss Universe Canada pageant because she wasn’t born female, but Trump subsequently overruled that decision.

     

    Trump downplayed the role transgender contestants had on that Monnin’s decision, even though pageant claim that was her motivation.

     

    “I don’t think that she had an issue with that,” Trump said. “I think her primary issue is that she lost and she’s angry about losing. And frankly, in my opinion, I saw her barely a second and she didn’t deserve to be in the top 15.”

     

    © 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

  • The Price of Inequality

    Joseph E. Stiglitz

     

    Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, has pioneered pathbreaking theories in the fields of economic information, taxation, development, trade, and technical change. As a policymaker, he served on and later chaired President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, and was Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of the World Bank. He is currently a professor at Columbia University, and has taught at Stanford, Yale, Princeton, and Oxford.He is the author of The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers our Future.

     

    The Price of Inequality

    05 June 2012

    NEW YORK – America likes to think of itself as a land of opportunity, and others view it in much the same light. But, while we can all think of examples of Americans who rose to the top on their own, what really matters are the statistics: to what extent do an individual’s life chances depend on the income and education of his or her parents?

    Nowadays, these numbers show that the American dream is a myth. There is less equality of opportunity in the United States today than there is in Europe – or, indeed, in any advanced industrial country for which there are data.

    This is one of the reasons that America has the highest level of inequality of any of the advanced countries – and its gap with the rest has been widening. In the “recovery” of 2009-2010, the top 1% of US income earners captured 93% of the income growth. Other inequality indicators – like wealth, health, and life expectancy – are as bad or even worse. The clear trend is one of concentration of income and wealth at the top, the hollowing out of the middle, and increasing poverty at the bottom.

    It would be one thing if the high incomes of those at the top were the result of greater contributions to society, but the Great Recession showed otherwise: even bankers who had led the global economy, as well as their own firms, to the brink of ruin, received outsize bonuses.

    A closer look at those at the top reveals a disproportionate role for rent-seeking: some have obtained their wealth by exercising monopoly power; others are CEOs who have taken advantage of deficiencies in corporate governance to extract for themselves an excessive share of corporate earnings; and still others have used political connections to benefit from government munificence – either excessively high prices for what the government buys (drugs), or excessively low prices for what the government sells (mineral rights).

    Likewise, part of the wealth of those in finance comes from exploiting the poor, through predatory lending and abusive credit-card practices. Those at the top, in such cases, are enriched at the direct expense of those at the bottom.

    It might not be so bad if there were even a grain of truth to trickle-down economics – the quaint notion that everyone benefits from enriching those at the top. But most Americans today are worse off – with lower real (inflation-adjusted) incomes – than they were in 1997, a decade and a half ago. All of the benefits of growth have gone to the top.

    Defenders of America’s inequality argue that the poor and those in the middle shouldn’t complain. While they may be getting a smaller share of the pie than they did in the past, the pie is growing so much, thanks to the contributions of the rich and superrich, that the size of their slice is actually larger. The evidence, again, flatly contradicts this. Indeed, America grew far faster in the decades after World War II, when it was growing together, than it has since 1980, when it began growing apart.

    This shouldn’t come as a surprise, once one understands the sources of inequality. Rent-seeking distorts the economy. Market forces, of course, play a role, too, but markets are shaped by politics; and, in America, with its quasi-corrupt system of campaign finance and its revolving doors between government and industry, politics is shaped by money.

    For example, a bankruptcy law that privileges derivatives over all else, but does not allow the discharge of student debt, no matter how inadequate the education provided, enriches bankers and impoverishes many at the bottom. In a country where money trumps democracy, such legislation has become predictably frequent.

    But growing inequality is not inevitable. There are market economies that are doing better, both in terms of both GDP growth and rising living standards for most citizens. Some are even reducing inequalities.

    America is paying a high price for continuing in the opposite direction. Inequality leads to lower growth and less efficiency. Lack of opportunity means that its most valuable asset – its people – is not being fully used. Many at the bottom, or even in the middle, are not living up to their potential, because the rich, needing few public services and worried that a strong government might redistribute income, use their political influence to cut taxes and curtail government spending. This leads to underinvestment in infrastructure, education, and technology, impeding the engines of growth.

    The Great Recession has exacerbated inequality, with cutbacks in basic social expenditures and with high unemployment putting downward pressure on wages. Moreover, the United Nations Commission of Experts on Reforms of the International Monetary and Financial System, investigating the causes of the Great Recession, and the International Monetary Fund have both warned that inequality leads to economic instability.

    But, most importantly, America’s inequality is undermining its values and identity. With inequality reaching such extremes, it is not surprising that its effects are manifest in every public decision, from the conduct of monetary policy to budgetary allocations. America has become a country not “with justice for all,” but rather with favoritism for the rich and justice for those who can afford it – so evident in the foreclosure crisis, in which the big banks believed that they were too big not only to fail, but also to be held accountable.

    America can no longer regard itself as the land of opportunity that it once was. But it does not have to be this way: it is not too late for the American dream to be restored.

    Read more from our “America’s Precarious Recovery” Focal Point.

     

    Copyright. 2012, ProjectSyndicate.com All Rights Reserved

  • The English Are Waiting for a Triple Crown Winner, Too

    Camelot racing away to a victory in the Epsom Derby, the second leg of England's Triple Crown. Should he run in and win the St. Leger, he would be the first Triple Crown winner since 1970.

    Tom Hevezi/Associated PressCamelot racing to victory in the Epsom Derby, the second leg of England’s Triple Crown. Should he run in and win the St. Leger, he would be the first Triple Crown winner since 1970.

     

    JUNE 7, 2012, 9:02 AM

    The English Are Waiting for a Triple Crown Winner, Too

    By VICTOR MATHER
    Tom Hevezi/Associated PressCamelot racing to victory in the Epsom Derby, the second leg of England’s Triple Crown. Should he run in and win the St. Leger, he would be the first Triple Crown winner since 1970.

    Though American racing fans have been waiting for a Triple Crown since 1978, the English have them beat. No horse has won the English Triple Crown for colts since 1970.

    The English Triple Crown is the original one: the use of the term “Triple Crown” to describe the Kentucky Derby, the Preakness Stakes and the Belmont Stakes dates to the 1920s, but the English equivalent goes back all the way to 1853, when a horse named West Australian won all three races.

    The lineup of England’s three races, all run on grass, is even more grueling than the lineup in America. First comes the 2000 Guineas Stakes at a mile in early May. In early June comes the Epsom Derby at one and a half miles. And Leg 3, the St. Leger Stakes, over nearly one and seven-eighths miles, is not run until September.

    There were 13 winners of the English Triple Crown for colts from 1853 to 1935, but there has been only one since, the great Nijinsky in 1970. Since then, only three horses have won even the first two legs of the series: Nashwan in 1989, Sea the Stars in 2009 and Camelot this year.

    (A filly can win an English Triple Crown as well, with wins in two races restricted to females, the 1,000 Guineas Stakes and the Oaks Stakes, followed by the St. Leger. The drought for this Triple is not so long: Oh So Sharp did it in 1985.)

    The major hurdle for potential winners of the colts’ Triple Crown is the vast spread of distances in the races. While the races in the American series are all at so-called classic distances, ranging from one and three-sixteenths miles to one and a half miles, the English series covers the gamut. Horses fast enough to win at the mile of the 2000 Guineas are often not durable enough to win at the one and one-half miles in the Derby and especially not at the punishing St. Leger distance.

    Also contributing to the dearth of Triple Crown winners is St. Leger’s fading popularity because of its unfashionable distance. That race is also run uncomfortably close to the Prix de L’Arc de Triomphe, the most prestigious race in Europe, which many Derby winners point to instead.

    As a result, since 1987, not one Derby winner has even entered the St. Leger, including the potential Triple Crown winners Nashwan and Sea the Stars.

    But the drought may finally be over: those connected with Camelot, the winner of the 2000 Guineas and the Derby this year, say they will buck convention and seriously consider a run in the St. Leger. Perhaps 2012 will be the year that both Triple Crown droughts end.

     

    Copyright 2012 The New York Times Company All Rights Reserved


  • Google Executives Deny Enabling Piracy, Talk Chrome Successes

    At the All Things D conference Wednesday afternoon, two senior Google executives denied charges from William Morris co-CEO Ari Emanuel that the company was refusing to filter unlicensed copyrighted material. Susan Wojcicki, senior vice president of advertising, and Sundar Pichai, Google’s senior vice president for Chrome and Apps, instead insisted the company is working with Hollywood to protect and monetize its content, especially on YouTube.

    Mossberg Wojcicki Pichai D10

    Above: Conference host Walt Mossberg, and Google execs Susan Wojcicki and Sundar Pichai

    “I think he was misinformed,” Wojcicki said. She confirmed that Google is working as hard as it can to block copyrighted content on YouTube because it doesn’t want to build a business based on illegal content. It created Content ID to identify content on YouTube, and takes down the material that copyright holders ask it to, or keeps it up and shares revenue with them.

    Pichai said it is a hard project to determine what content is copyrighted, and Wojcicki said the company has spent more than $30 million on this effort. Google is pulling down more than one million URLs each month when they are identified as infringing by the content creators. The results are posted so people can see what has been taken down.

    “We can identify the content,”  Wojcicki said, but at the end of the day, it is a business issue because the rights to the content are often not clear; different parts of content are sometimes owned or controlled by different people. (Unfortunately, the conversation with the Google executives didn’t really get into the issue of linking to international websites that primarily host such content.)

    Conference host Walt Mossberg asked Wojcicki, who runs the DoubleClick Internet advertising service, why so much advertising is poorly targeted.

    Ever since Google first started in advertising, she answered, it has been focused on providing relevant material. When you are searching for something, Google is able to match what you are searching for with relevant advertising through its “smart ad serving system,” which she said is known as “Smart ASS.”  

    Display advertising was very basic just a few years ago, and it has gotten more sophisticated lately with things like ad exchanges.  

    Pichai said the personalization of advertising is still in its early days, with most ads placed based just on IP addresses and the sites they appear on. As more people are logged in and more people use mobile phones, advertising will get better, he said.

    Mossberg asked Pichai about reports that Chrome is now the leading browser, and he replied that Google’s internal data is substantially in agreement. ”We are number one or a very close number two in almost all countries in the world,” he said.  

    Chrome is even more popular among consumers, because corporate users are often forced to use Internet Explorer, and is doing particularly well in emerging markets where speed is particularly important.

    When asked about the Chrome OS and how it is different from Android, Pichai said it originated from the view that there are many instances in which people spend all their time on the Internet. When your applications and your data are all in the cloud, he said, it gives rise to a different model of computing with no administration, versioning, or installation of software.

    So why hasn’t it taken off? Pichai said the first commercial market only came out a year ago. Google is only in the third year of its evolution of Chrome, as opposed to Android, which has been in development since 2005.

    Recently, Chrome has added more things like a windows manager, the ability to view a Web application in an immersive full screen method, and a task bar. The operating system will continue to get more features. “It’s a journey and we’re deeply committed to it,” he added.

    Pichai said we will be seeing Chromebooks at a variety of price points going forward.

    Responding to an audience question, he said Google will be rolling out better ways of handling multiple accounts on different Google services, and Wojcicki added that having one account that can manage all of Google services is a key focus of the company.

         Copyright.2012. ZiffDavis,Inc. All Rights Reserved
  • Only the Brave Excel at Formula One’s Risky Business

    Christinne Muschi/Reuters

    Suffering only a minor concussion, the Polish driver  Robert Kubica survived a spectacular crash of his BMW  Sauber at the 2007 Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal on  the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve, considered one of Formula One’s most dangerous circuits.

     

    June 7, 2012
     

    Only the Brave Excel at Formula One’s Risky Business

    By BRAD SPURGEON

    On a particularly difficult section of the Monaco circuit, Jenson Button, a driver at the McLaren Mercedes team, said at the race in the Mediterranean principality a few weeks ago, drivers must be brave to get it right.

    “You just have to be brave enough to try and get as close as you can to that edge of the barrier,” he said of the corner called Bureau de Tabac, “because you carry the speed through the corner, knowing that it drops away after that.”

    As Formula One stages the Canadian Grand Prix at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve — another track with close walls — on Île Notre-Dame in Montreal this weekend, it has been 30 years since the circuit’s namesake, one of the bravest drivers ever, was killed in an accident at the Belgian Grand Prix in Zolder on May 8, 1982. A month later, another driver, Riccardo Paletti, was killed in a race accident on the Canadian circuit that had been renamed for Villeneuve.

    After a safety overhaul that year, it would be 12 years before another death on a race weekend. But on May 1, 1994, one of the bravest and best, Ayrton Senna, died at the San Marino Grand Prix at Imola, Italy. The day before, Roland Ratzenberger, a rookie, had been killed during a practice track session.

    Again the series overhauled its safety regulations, and there has not been another fatality since. In fact, the series has come to appear so safe that the paradigm of racing drivers as brave superheroes seems to have faded. Yet among drivers, team managers, owners and other racing people, the consensus remains that racing a modern Formula One car still requires considerable bravery.

    “That’s why I do it,” said Daniel Ricciardo, an Australian driver at the Toro Rosso team. “We do it because it requires us to be brave and to stand out from the others. I’ve always preferred tighter circuits, street circuits, because there’s many more moments when you need to be brave and let it all hang out.”

    Because it is on a small island in the Saint Lawrence River, there is little possibility for modifying the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve or its surroundings. It has therefore remained one of Formula One’s most dangerous courses — like Monaco — with concrete barriers and steel guardrails inches from the edge of the track in many areas and high curbs and fast corners.

    Niki Lauda, a three-time world champion, who was administered the last rites by a priest after a fiery accident that he would in fact survive at the old Nürburgring track in August 1976, said a driver must still be brave.

    “To drive a car quick today is the same effort,” Lauda said. “You have to be a guy who likes risks, even if it is much reduced the amount of risk you have…. In my time we had to have 100 percent risk and no fear, and if we die, tough …. Today, thank God, it is 10 times better.”

    Lauda, an Austrian, recovered within weeks of the 1976 crash and raced the rest of the season. His face remains scarred from burns that he suffered.

    The French driver Jacques Laffite, a contemporary of Lauda and Villeneuve, was seriously injured in an accident at the British Grand Prix at Brands Hatch in 1986 and still has multiple screws and pins in his legs and back.

    “When I went off for a racing weekend, I wasn’t sure I would return on the Monday,” Laffite said recently. “Which is a little different today, even if you still have to be careful today.”

    He applauded the safety improvements, but noted that “bravery is still necessary for a racing driver.”

    “You need bravery to go 200 or 300 kilometers an hour without visibility into a corner where you don’t know what is at the other end,” he said.

    Nonetheless, Laffite suggested it is easier to be brave today. “Before, when you had a steel barrier like in Zeltweg at the Bosch corner and you came up to it at 300 k.p.h. and you knew that if you cut it and hit the barrier at 270 k.p.h., the guy who braked two meters closer was the more courageous,” he said.

    Villeneuve, who had started his career racing snowmobiles and was always a daredevil, had a different level of physiological reaction to speed and danger than the average person and even than many of his fellow drivers.

    In his biography of Villeneuve, the Canadian journalist Gerald Donaldson recounts how Villeneuve and his teammate at Ferrari, Didier Pironi, were tested for pulse rate while racing. At Monaco, Pironi’s pulse went from 60 beats per minute to between 180 and 207 throughout the race. In Villeneuve’s case, “the medical people were shocked to find his heart rate barely blipped above an average of 127 despite his ever-vigorous on-track activities.”

    Villeneuve, Donaldson wrote, “was always more worried about setting a quick time than crashing.”

    Modern medical tests on drivers have improved, and today, Riccardo Ceccarelli, a Formula One doctor who works for the Toro Rosso and Lotus teams and runs a performance clinic for racing drivers in Italy, said his studies had shown that racing drivers in general do not have the same physiological reactions in their brain functions while undergoing stress as “normal” people .

    “From my data, I can say that the driver is different from a normal person,” Ceccarelli said. “Comparing the brain of a Formula One driver during the action and a normal person, we see the performances are very similar, but he consumes much less blood in the brain to do the same effort.”

    Ceccarelli was the longtime doctor for Robert Kubica, a Polish driver who survived a crash at the track in Canada in 2007 when his BMW Sauber practically disintegrated but he had only a minor concussion. Last year, however, Kubica had multiple fractures in his arms, legs and hands from an accident in a rally race and he has still not recovered enough to return to Formula One.

    Christian Horner, a former driver in the lower series and the director of the Red Bull team, which has won the world titles in the past two seasons with Sebastian Vettel and whose other driver, Mark Webber, won the race in Monaco two weeks ago, is adamant that drivers must still exercise bravery today.

    “Bravery is still huge,” he said. Referring to a section of the Monaco circuit, he added: “When you are driving up a hill in seventh gear at 165, 175 miles per hour into Casino Square, which is a quick left-right corner sequence with varying cambers with a car pulling around all over the place, it’s ultimate commitment.”

    For Peter Sauber, owner of the Sauber team and a former racer, bravery is not quite the right word. Rather, he suggested, “You need a lot of confidence and the ability to surpass yourself.”

    “And you need trust in yourself and faith in your car,” Sauber said.

    And, he added, drivers “have to be a little bit crazy.”

     

    Copyright. 2012. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved

     

     

  • A Story About Fishing With Friends and Family

    Home» Blog » Fishing and a lovely day on a deserted beach.

  • Forest Fires, Already Burned the Largest Area inNew Mexico’c History

    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_8


    A member of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew from Prescott, Arizona, watches as flames take off during a burnout operation meant to contain part of the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_9


    Brandon Bunch, right, a member of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew from Prescott, Arizona, listens to instructions before helping with a burnout operation on the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_6


    Members of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew from Prescott, Arizona, look at a map of the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_1


    Members of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew refuel their drip torches before continuing with a burnout operation meant to contain part of the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_10


    A tree goes up in flames as Dan Matthews with the Prescott, Arizona Hotshot crew keeps watch over a section of burnout that was meant to contain part of the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_4


    Brandon Bunch, a member of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew from Prescott, Arizona, waits to refuel his drip torch before continuing with a burnout operation meant to contain part of the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_2


    Members of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew watch as a whole hill goes up in flames during a burnout operation meant to contain part of the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_5


    The Granite Mountain Hotshot crew from Prescott, Arizona scouts a piece of terrain before starting a burnout operation that was meant to help contain the Whitewater-Baldy fire, which is now the largest fire in New Mexico history.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_7


    Dan Matthews with the Prescott, Arizona Hotshot crew keeps watch over a section of burnout that was meant to help contain the Whitewater-Baldy fire on May 31. The fire is now the largest ever in New Mexico history.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


    Whitewater-Baldy_Fire_11


    Members of the Granite Mountain Hotshot crew.

    Photo: Jakob Schiller


     

    The largest fire in New Mexico’s history kicked off this year’s fire season on May 16, with another big fire spreading across Utah and Nevada over the weekend – both ignited by lighting. While there have been earlier, smaller fires, the Whitewater-Baldy fire in the Gila National Forest of Southern New Mexico has received national attention by consuming over 250,000 acres. It’s currently about 20 percent contained.

    As a photojournalist, for me wildland fire is a weirdly addictive thing to cover. The act of fighting fires creates a unique and particularly visual moment where natural elements face off with human technology and strategy. Each summer I usually find myself inhaling lungs full of what has now become the familiar smell of tree smoke.

    Covering these infernos varies from state to state and there are some things you should know before running off to make your own pictures of crowning trees or planes dropping slurry. It’s very easy to get injured in these situations and the only way to ensure one’s safety is to stay away entirely, but for those who must go for whatever reason, these can be helpful tips. Shoot at your own risk.

    1. Go through a safety training. Anyone who wants to be out on a wildfire should know some basic things about fire behavior. You should also know how to use a fire shelter. In some places it’s not a requirement to have any training, but it’s going to make you feel a lot better when you’re standing next to, or in, a forest of blazing trees. It’s also going to make a the firefighters feel a lot better about letting you tag along if they know you can take care of yourself.

    2. Don’t get mesmerized by the flames. The first time you’re on a fire it’s an amazing experience to stand next to a wall of flames. But remember, there is a lot more to a forest fire than just the fire. For me, it’s always about the people. I want my photos to tell a story about the firefighter’s work and the potential dangers. Flame pictures can quickly get boring, so find a way to dig a little deeper.

    3. Invest in proper fire gear. You will never be allowed anywhere near a fire unless you have the proper wildland fire equipment including fire resistant pants, a fire resistant shirt, fire approved boots, a helmet, gloves and a fire shelter.

    4. Show, don’t tell. It’s easy to show a firefighter lighting some grass on fire. It’s harder to capture how fatigued that firefighter might feel after doing that for 12 hours each day.

    5. Know your state’s regulations. In California the media are granted much more access and can usually go anywhere they want unless they are endangering the safety of others. In New Mexico where I currently live, to get anywhere near a forest fire you have to be accompanied by some kind of fire official.

    6. Pay attention to the light. This is one of the first rules of photography, but in a fire you often have a unique chance to exploit crazy light situations. At the Whitewater-Baldy fire for example, all the smoke acted like a huge, rose-tinted softbox. It muted the highlights and gave me a wonderfully soft light to play with even at noon when the light is usually awful. In the evening the setting sun often turns the smoke all kinds of colors, so if you have the time stick around until the end of the day.

    7. When it doesn’t feel safe, turn around and go back. All the firefighters I’ve ever worked with have kept an eye out for me, but sometimes their level of comfort and my level of comfort differ because they are 100 times more experienced. There have been a couple times when I was told I could keep going, but it didn’t feel safe so I called it. The way I see it, if I’m worrying about my safety I’m probably not paying attention to my photography.

    8. Always bring more of everything. More batteries. More water and more food. Almost every time I shoot a fire I end up spending double the amount of time than I expected. Sometimes it takes longer to get access to the fire. Sometimes it takes longer to get to the spot where you want to shoot. Sometimes you’re stuck in one spot because it’s not safe to move. Firefighters are always well stocked with water and Gatorade and more than happy to share their provisions. But just to be safe, make sure you have that extra quart of water and couple extra granola bars packed away.

    9. The moment oftentimes isn’t at the fire. One of my favorite fire photos of all time happened at base camp. I was with a group of elite firefighters camped 10 miles into the California wilderness. Before heading out for the day one of the women in the crew took a moment to practice yoga under a tree. The picture was unexpected and I think it added a lot of important information to a story about what the life of a firefighter really looks like.

    Special thanks to Denise Ottaviano from the U.S. Forest Service for her help at the Whitewater-Baldy fire.

     

    Jakob Schiller

    Jakob Schiller is a writer and photographer at Raw File.

    Read more by Jakob Schiller

    Follow @jakobschiller on Twitter.

     

    Copyright. 2012 wired.com All Rights Reserved