Month: March 2012

  • Formula 1 Grand Prix Season 2012. After Two Races in Australia and Malaysia

    The Pit Stop: How the Formula 1 season is shaping up after the Malaysian Grand Prix

     
    Keith Collantine

     
    Tue, 03/27/2012 – 16:35

     
    Our resident petrolhead Keith Collantine looks at the movers and shakers after the second race of the season.

     

     
    “It’s strange to see the driver who’s leading the championship priced as high as 6.0 to winit. But that figure was two-and-a-half times higher before the race”

     

    Contrasting form at Ferrari

    The Ferrari F2012 is not a race-winning car in normal conditions at the moment.

    It was the fifth-fastest car in qualifying, 1.3 seconds per lap slower than Lewis Hamilton’s pole position time in the McLaren.

    It had no business being at the front of the field, but Alonso put it there.

    Nor did it really deserve to be quite as far behind as Felipe Massa was in the sister F2012. Having been five seconds behind Alonso at the restart, he was 97 seconds adrift when the race finished 42 laps later.

    No wonder Massa has the longest odds on beating his team mate this year. At 15.0, it’s three times higher than rookie Romain Grosjean’s price for beating his world champion team mate Kimi Raikkonen at Lotus – 4.75.

    And it’s also no wonder Massa has been tipped to be replaced at Ferrari.

    Perez impresses

    Sergio Perez stole the show in Malaysia with a dazzling drive to second for Sauber.

    Coming in only his 19th F1 start, the young Mexican has made his mark on Formula One. Before the race he was already being linked with a Ferrari drive.

    Now rumours are mounting that he will replace Massa at the team, possibly before the end of the year.

    Perez had an excellent debut season last year, despite missing two races following a nasty crash in Monaco.

    He produced an excellent drive at Suzuka – a real driver’s circuit – scoring points despite being ill. He even had the time to play a practical joke on his team, telling them on the radio he’d lost power as he raced to the finishing line.

    Like the car he drove last year, the Sauber C31 is very kind to its tyres. This is a problem in qualifying, where it struggles to warm its tyres up for a single flying lap.

    But it’s a blessing in the races, allowing its drivers to make fewer pit stops. Perez did his final stint in Malaysia on a set of used hard tyres and was taking up to a second per lap out of Alonso.

    He gained ground early on the race by gambling on an early switch to wet weather tyres. He flew on the drenched surface as his rivals shuffled in and out of the pits, following his smart tactical decision.

    If you fancy an early punt on him for Shanghai – where we’ve seen wet races in two of the last three years – he’s currently priced at 25.0 to win.

    Oh, Fernando!

    Before Sunday’s race I wrote: “If anyone’s going to grab the championship in an unfavourable car, it’s Fernando Alonso”.

    But I’d be lying if I said I expected him to be in the lead of the championship at this stage.

    It’s strange to see the driver who’s leading the championship priced as high as 6.0 to win it. But that figure was two-and-a-half times higher before the race.

    Red Bull down but not out

    You wouldn’t have gone anywhere near the odds on Red Bull to win last year – they were so dominant the prices weren’t worth a second look.

    That’s slowly changing as the team finds its RB8 a more difficult creation, shorn of the trick exhaust-blown diffuser that made it such a peerless machine last year.

    The team are at 2.7 to beat McLaren in the constructors’ championship. Mark Webber – who’s out-qualified Sebastian Vettel in both races this year and seems to prefer the handling of the non-EBD car – is priced at 15.0 to win in China.

    Keith Collantine is the editor of Formula One blog F1 Fanatic

     Copyright. 2012. unibet.com. All Rights Reserved
  • James Cameron back on surface after deepest ocean dive

    James Cameron back on surface after deepest ocean dive

    By Rebecca MorelleScience reporter, BBC News, Guam

     

    James Cameron: “It’s a heck of a ride, you’re just screaming down and screaming back up”

    Hollywood director James Cameron has returned to the surface after plunging nearly 11km (seven miles) down to the deepest place in the ocean, the Mariana Trench in the western Pacific.

    He made the solo descent in a submarine called Deepsea Challenger, taking over two hours to reach the bottom.

    He spent more than four hours exploring the ocean floor, before a speedy ascent back to the surface.

    His craft was kitted out with cameras so he could film the deep in 3D.

    “It was absolutely the most remote, isolated place on the planet,” Mr Cameron told BBC News.

    “I really feel like in one day I’ve been to another planet and come back.”

    This is only the second manned expedition to the ocean’s deepest depths – the first took place in 1960 when US Navy Lt Don Walsh and Swiss oceanographer Jacques Piccard spent about 20 minutes on the ocean floor in a bathyscaphe called the Trieste.

    Lt Walsh, who is now in his 80s, joined Mr Cameron and his team of engineers out at sea for the dive.

    “It did bring back a lot of memories, just being out there and remembering what we did there,” he told BBC News. “It was really grand.”

    James Cameron after returning to the surfaceDirector James Cameron resurfaced after spending four hours on the ocean floor

    Mr Cameron has spent the past few years working in secret with his team of engineers to design and build the craft, which weighs 11 tonnes and is more than 7m (23ft) long.

    He describes it as a “vertical torpedo” that slices through the water allowing him a speedy descent.

    The extraordinary attention to detail prevented him from suffering from too much nervousness.

    “I can’t say that I wasn’t apprehensive in the last few days and even the weeks leading up to this, but there’s another part of my mind that really understands the engineering and knows why we did everything the way we did,” he said.

    “Any apprehension I had I left at the hatch. When I went into the sub, I was all pilot at that point.”

    The tiny compartment that the film-maker sits in is made from thick steel, which is able to resist the 1,000 atmospheres of pressure he experienced at full ocean depth.

    The rest of the vertical column is made from a material called syntactic foam – a solid made mostly of hollow “microballoons” – giving it enough buoyancy to float back up.

    The sub has so many lights and cameras that it is like an underwater TV studio – with Mr Cameron able to direct and film the action from within. He intends to release a documentary.

    It also has robotic arms, allowing him to collectsamples of rocks and soils, and a team of researchers are working alongside the director to identify any new species. He says that science is key to his mission.

    But the first task was to get to the inky depths – which despite untold hours oftraining, still surprised Mr Cameron.

    “My reference frame was going to the Titanic 10 or 12 years ago, and thinking that was the deepest place I could ever imagine,” he recalled.

    “On this dive I blazed past Titanic depth at 12,000 ft and was only a third of the way down, and the numbers keep going up and up and up on the depth gauge.

    “You just kind of look at them with a sense of disbelief, and you wonder if the bottom is ever going to be there.”

    At the bottom, Mr Cameron encountered incredibly fine silt, which he had to be careful not to disturb. He said he spotted a few small, as-yet unidentified life forms but found the depths to be a “sterile, almost desert-like place”.

     

    Before the dive, James Cameron told the BBC’s Rebecca Morelle why he was risking it all

    While manned exploration had until now seen a 52-year hiatus, scientists have used two robotic unmanned vehicles to explore the Mariana Trench: Japan’s Kaiko made a dive there in 1995 and the US-based Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s vessel Nereus explored the deep in 2008.

    Other teams, such as Scotland’s Oceanlab, have also been dropping simple landers loaded with bait and cameras into the deepest ocean.

    While places like the Mariana Trench were once thought to be of little interest, there has been a recent resurgence of scientific interest in the deep.

    Scientists are finding life that can resist the colossal pressures, from deep-sea fish to shrimp-like scavengers called amphipods, some of which can reach 30cm (1ft) long.

    They are also trying to understand the role that deep seas trenches play in earthquakes – these cracks in the sea floor are formed at the boundary of two tectonic plates and some believe the push and pull taking place deep underwater could be the cause of major earthquakes, such as the 2011 quake that resulted in such devastation in Japan.

    But some scientists question whether manned exploration provides the best platform for scientific research.

    Dr Alan Jamieson, from Oceanlab, said: “I think what James Cameron has done is a really good achievement in terms of human endeavour and technology.

    “But my feeling is that manned submersibles like this are limited in scientific capabilities when compared to other systems, mostly due to the fact there is someone in it. Remote or autonomous systems can collect a far greater volume of useful scientific data for far less money.”

     

    Engineer David Wotherspoon explains how Deepsea Challenger works

    Mr Cameron says he does not want this dive to the deep to be a one-off, and wants to use it as a platform for ocean exploration.

    His craft may also soon be joined by other manned submersibles vying to reach the ocean’s deepest depths.

    One of these crafts, the DeepFlight Challenger, belongs to former real estate investor Chris Welsh, and is backed by Virgin’s Richard Branson. It is about to begin its water trials.

    Its design is based on a plane, and Mr Welsh says he will be “flying” down to the deepest ocean.

    Google’s Eric Schmidt has helped to finance another sub being built by a US marine technology company called Doer Marine. They want this sub to carry two to three people, and are placing a heavy emphasis on science.

    And Triton submarines, a Florida-based submersible company, intends to build a sub with a giant glass sphere at its centrepiece to take tourists down to the deepest ocean for $250,000 a ticket.

     

     

    Copyright. 2012. BBC.com All Rights Reserved

  • Ferrari win comes after heavy rain stops play and action begins anew

    F1: Alonso surprises with Malaysian GP victory in Sepang weather game
     

    Ferrari win comes after heavy rain stops play and action begins anew

    Following an extremely action packed 14th FIA Formula One Malaysian Grand Prix, which was brought on by a deluge of rain and caused the race to be suspended temporarily, Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso was the man of the moment when he took his 28th career victory as a result of the surprising turn of events.

    Alonso commented on the dramatic events from the race, and expressed his feelings on picking up a surprising win.

    “It was an incredible race! I am very happy, for me and for the whole team: I am proud of this fantastic group of people. While we have been going through this difficult time, no one gave up, in fact everyone has doubled their efforts to try and catch up… Our aim was damage limitation for these early races of the championship and now we even find ourselves leading the classification. Now we absolutely have to improve the performance starting right away with the races in China and Bahrain. We must get back to work immediately so as to find at least the two or three tenths that could put us back in the fight for the top places”, explained Alonso.

    The unexpected results continued and especially where the second step on the podium was concerned. Sauber’s Sergio Perez amazingly took second place at the end of the race, which was an impressive achievement considering the conditions that the whole field had to battle through. The Mexican also has the team to thank, after the decision was made for him to pit on the first lap and change to full wet tyres. This early strategy in play appeared to pay off and make the rest of his Grand Prix, as Perez certainly gave the usual front runners a challenge and he put in some blistering lap times.

    Sergio Perez, Sauber F1 Team and Fernando Alonso, Scuderia Ferrari
    Sergio Perez, Sauber F1 Team and Fernando Alonso, Scuderia Ferrari

    Photo by: motorsport.com

     

    Perez was inevitably surprised by the second place that he achieved, and he explained how he felt after picking up such an unexpected result.

    “It is a great day for me. The team did a very good job and I feel very happy for them. It is a really nice feeling to have been on the podium here, but I think victory was also within reach… It is only our second race in 2012 and I think we have a great season ahead of us. I knew we had potential to fight today, our car is not far away from the top cars and a good crew and driver can also make a difference in such conditions”, commented Perez.

    Meanwhile, McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton experienced disappointment after failing to convert his second consecutive pole position into a race victory. The Englishman appeared to have a fairly steady race initially, and maintained the lead from the start. However, after the re-start following the safety car period and short race suspension, the pit stop palaver of the rear jack getting stuck meant that he lost the lead and dropped slightly down the pack. As a result of the problems that occurred, Hamilton had to settle for a third place finish overall.

    In the lead up to the race proceedings beginning there were concerns raised that the weather would soon affect the action taking place on the track. The initial speculation soon turned into a reality before the number of laps completed were even into double figures. However, there was one driver left stationary as the rest of the field started the formation lap. Hispania Racing’s Pedro de la Rosa suddenly appeared to be going nowhere fast, which led to him being safely rescued and he started from the pit lane in the end.

    When the lights finally went out to mark the start of the race in the first instance, Hamilton maintained pole position well from his team mate, Jenson Button. Suddenly though as they approached the first corner after going down the long straight, the McLaren Mercedes duo were side by side and miraculously avoided any contact. Fortunately, as this was the case both drivers remained on the track and maintained their first and second positions respectively at that stage.

    Meanwhile, there appeared to be chaos unfolding behind the first two drivers, as Lotus-Renault’s Romain Grosjean lost his third place to Red Bull’s Mark Webber as he rapidly fell down the field. Sadly, Williams’ driver Bruno Senna also suffered the same fate as Grosjean and lost places at the start. The Brazilian’s race at that early stage did not improve, as it appeared that he had contact with Mercedes driver Michael Schumacher who spun his car prior to the knock. Consequently, the pair had to face the consequences of their actions in this mishap, and Schumacher dropped down to 16th position as Grosjean was a little further behind in 18th place. At the same time as Schumacher having a miserable start to his Grand Prix, his German team mate and fellow countryman, Nico Rosberg was also in hot water as he fought for position with Perez. Luckily Rosberg’s fortune soon changed when Perez went into the pits for a tyre change, which meant that the pressure was slightly off him for a short while.

    As the rain continued to fall over the Sepang circuit, the pit stop window arrived sooner than drivers and teams may have anticipated. The likes of Ferrari’s Felipe Massa, Alonso and Button were the first to blink and visit the pits for an essential tyre change.

    Unlike some of the drivers who were temporarily out of the action due to pit stops, Grosjean’s race had already got off to an unfortunate start and was about to come to a sad end very quickly. The Frenchman was spotted off the track where he had ended up in the gravel, which spelt the end of his participation in the rest of the action and he did not get to make a much needed pit stop for tyres. It was later reported that Grosjean’s retirement after spinning off at Turn four, was not helped as his team mate Kimi Raikkonen was in the pits for his tyre change, when Grosjean had to stay out on the intermediate tyres.

    Despite the treacherous conditions on the track, the tussles for position were very much in full swing. The two double World Champions, Alonso and Sebastian Vettel were scrapping for position on lap four. However, Vettel had the upperhand at the time and was running in fourth place ahead of the Spaniard. Interestingly, a similar situation occurred between Button and Schumacher, as Button caught the seven time World Champion at a vulnerable moment and passed by with ease into Turn seven.

    Almost immediately after clearing Schumacher out of his way, Button then had a close encounter with his team mate Hamilton. The pair nearly came together as Button had quite a bit of speed at that point and nearly ended up going into the back of the 2008 World Champion at Turn three.

    Romain Grosjean, Lotus F1
    Romain Grosjean, Lotus F1

    Photo by: motorsport.com

     

    As a result of the majority of the field voicing their concerns on the weather and track conditions the safety car was deployed on lap six. Before this moment arrived Vettel had a slight wobble and went off the track momentarily. The double and reigning World Champion then went on to overtake Toro Rosso’s Jean-Eric Vergne. The pair were then running in sixth and seventh place respectively as the safety car made an appearance to control the proceedings on the track.

    Due to the impossible conditions on the track that the drivers were struggling through, even with the safety car in place the FIA took the decision to suspend the race temporarily on lap nine. This meant that the entire field with just 23 drivers remaining in the race had to form up on the straight and were then in running order rather than the starting grid order. Unfortunately, the drivers and teams then had to play the waiting game, as the rain continued to fall and the conditions were deemed to dangers to continue racing then.

    Before the time came when the race had to be stopped, there were some drivers that had made their way up the field unexpectedly. The winners at this point in time relating to tyre choices, included Hispania Racing, and in particular for Narain Karthikeyan who found himself in 10th place on lap seven. Vergne had also done well even though the race had barely begun. The Frenchman is of course only into his second Grand Prix of his rookie season this year. While the race was suspended and the cars were lined up on the grid, Vergne then had the opportunity to have his tyres changed. Under the FIA rules and regulations the teams are permitted to carry out a necessary work on the cars on the track at this point which included free choices with tyre changes.

    For what may have seemed like a very long wait for the drivers and teams, the race was confirmed to re-start at 17:15 local time behind the safety car. It was also compulsory that the cars must all be running with wet weather tyres fitted to them. There was also confirmation at this stage that the DRS would be disabled until it was deemed safe to be in operation again.

    When the race was underway at last on lap 10 but still with the safety car at the helm, it seemed that De la Rosa’s progress within it would be delayed momentarily. Sadly, the Spaniard’s day was going from bad to worse after his delayed start earlier on. He was then under investigation by the stewards for personnel still being on the grid as the race re-started. The stewards appeared to waste no time in coming to a decision on the issue, and De la Rosa was soon forced to serve a drive through penalty as punishment. Following his visit through the pit lane, De la Rosa re-joined the race in 17th place.

    Meanwhile, towards the front of the field and Button was unexpectedly under pressure from Perez. Unfortunately, Button lost his second place but then went on to pit and Hamilton joined his team mate soon after when he made his stop. When the time came and Hamilton was temporarily out of the way, this led Perez to take over first place on lap 14. Despite this new territory at the front of the field and not normally used to have a clear road ahead, Perez appeared to handle the situation well and proved he deserved to be there which reflected the lap times he put in. Not long after his promotion into first place Perez was the fastest man on the track, even though the times were slightly off normal ones due to the weather. He topped the timesheets with a lap of 2:04.969secs on lap 15.

    Jenson Button, McLaren Mercedes and Narain Karthikeyan, HRT Formula One Team make contact
    Jenson Button, McLaren Mercedes and Narain Karthikeyan, HRT Formula One Team make contact

    Photo by: motorsport.com

     

    Sadly, Button’s fortune in the race was deteriorating at this stage and he found himself coming together with Karthikeyan. The 2009 World Champion was forced to pit for a new nose and new front tyres after suffering a puncture as well. Consequently, he re-joined the race way down in 22nd place.

    Even though Perez appeared to be in control at the front of the pack, it appeared that Alonso wanted to muscle in on the action as he successfully took first place on lap 16. There were similarities in terms of action on the track between the front and midfield at this point. As there was a healthy battle unfolding between Toro Rosso’s Daniel Ricciardo who took 14th place from Senna on lap 19 and Sauber’s Kamui Kobayashi was also in the mix as well in 13th place.

    Despite the DRS being enabled on lap 20 to assist with potential overtakes, Button was having problems at the back of the field. After reporting via the team radio that he had issues getting heat into his tyres, this meant that he may be overtaken rather than the one doing the overtaking. However, Vettel appeared to have no such problems towards the front of the pack. The German appeared to be on a charge on lap 23 as he put his DRS and KERS to use, which was a success as he jumped into fourth place ahead of Mercedes driver Nico Rosberg. This then led the way for the likes of Raikkonen and Webber to pounce on Rosberg as he appeared to be struggling for pace. Similarly, Rosberg’s string of bad luck appeared to be rubbing off on his team mate Schumacher. The pair suddenly came under threat from their midfield rivals. Schumacher lost out to Senna who made an easy overtake stick on lap 25.

    For some the midfield runners the race appeared to favour some, as the progress and results of Perez and overtakes from Senna proved. This came to the forefront of the action when the race was just over half distance. Senna continued his manoeuvres as he took on Force India’s Nico Hulkenberg, Massa and Vergne were also on the scene at the time.

    Following lots of scraps for position between the midfield runners, this meant that there was a shakeup in terms of the running order. It was then noticeable how some drivers had quietly crept into the action, and where some had appeared to keep themselves out of the limelight. Force India’s Paul Di Resta was one driver who suddenly appeared from nowhere, and was running in seventh place in lap 28. Where the back of the field was concerned though, with the exception of mainly Schumacher, Rosberg and Button who had problems that led them there, the likes of Williams’ driver Pastor Maldonado, De la Rosa, the Caterham duo Vitaly Petrov and Heikki Kovalainen and Marussia’s Timo Glock and Charles Pic, all seemed to just be getting through the laps in their own little world.

    Back at the front of the field though and Raikkonen and Webber were scrapping over fifth and sixth places respectively. Perez was also making tracks just a little further ahead of them, as he was topping the timesheets from one minute to the next, with lap times ranging from 1:57.647secs on lap 32 to 1:54.018secs on lap 38. Nevertheless, Alonso was still maintaining first place with his prancing horse and Hamilton was holding onto third place just behind the top two.

    While Alonso had the proceedings very much in control, even with Perez closing down the gap with his blistering lap times, his Brazilian team mate Massa found himself scrapping for position down the field with Button. Initially, Button had the upperhand as he caught Massa napping on their way around Turn two on lap 35. Massa’s situation then worsened as Ricciardo managed to pass by and take 17th place from him. As a result of this bad spell for Massa in the Grand Prix, he took the decision to pit on lap 40 for a tyre change. Unfortunately, this did not improve his chances on the track though as there was a delay in getting the right rear wheel onto his car.

    On the other hand, following Ricciardo’s pit stop for a tyre change and going onto the slick tyres, this appeared to be the right time and decision to do so as proved by his lap times. Around lap 41 the Australian topped the timesheets with a lap of 1:49.800secs. As the next pit stop window appeared to have arrived, some of the drivers followed the trend and opted for slick tyres as well. This included the likes of Senna, Di Resta and Webber. Hamilton was also among those who took their chance to pit at this stage and he re-joined the race in third place. Inevitably, Perez took the lead when Alonso had to make his pit stop, as he took the decision to continue racing on at that point.

    However, an exciting piece of action occurred in the pits at this stage as a pit stop race took place. Vettel entered the pits first and upon exit from the pits, Raikkonen was close by but the pair managed to avoid contact luckily. Hamilton and Perez then made their pit stops after their rivals had completed them just minutes before.

    As the slick tyres appeared to be the favoured tyre towards the last 10 laps of the race, and the conditions had also improved as well it seemed that it was the right one to go with. Webber was the first man to prove this as he set the fastest time with a lap of 1:45.975secs on lap 42 from fifth place.

    Pastor Maldonado, Williams
    Pastor Maldonado, Williams

    Photo by:motorsport.com

     

    Maldonado also jumped on the band waggon and competed with this time all the way from 11th place. The Venezuelan driver topped the timesheets with a 1:43.967secs soon after Webber made his mark on his competitors.

    While the lap time contest was in progress all over the field, Di Resta lost a place to Senna who was running well and got into seventh place as a result of their battle on lap 44. Perez was having a different experience in second place though, as he has normally appeared to be one of the midfield being chased rather than being the chaser. On lap 45 his progress was remarkable and he topped the timesheets once again with a lap of 1:42.758secs. Consequently, there was still time on Perez’s side to potentially catch Alonso and threaten his hold on first place. Suddenly, the tables appeared to turn in Perez’s favour as he found himself even closer to Alonso as they went down the straight on lap 46. Unfortunately, Perez was not able to get close enough at that point, but it was certainly a moment for Alonso to see the Sauber in his mirrors.

    When 10 laps were remaining of the 56 lap marathon, the battles were still very much alive for position across the pack. Button had managed to gain momentum and improve his position, on lap 46 the Englishman got into 15th place after passing Rosberg.

    As Button appeared to be getting back on track, some of the usual front runners had sudden problems. Unexpectedly, Vettel suffered a left rear tyre puncture on lap 48 and had to gingerly go to the pits and have a replacement fitted. Although Vettel lost out at this point and dropped down the running order to 12th place, his team mate Webber benefitted and took over fourth place. It was reported that Vettel had clipped Karthikeyan’s front wing, but it was a little too close for comfort as a result of the puncture. The incident between the pair also made part of the track like an obstacle course as some of the debris from Vettel’s tyre was scattered around.

    Meanwhile, where the battle at the front was concerned, as Perez was edging ever closer to Alonso, his chance arrived on lap 49 down the main straight with KERS and DRS in use. Unfortunately, he failed to catch Alonso after running wide at Turn 13 as his car mounted the kerb momentarily. This worked in favour of Alonso who had the pressure off him once again, and he could drive off into the distance and build up the gap. Even though Perez had this minor blip he remained in second place, unlike his Japanese team mate Kobayashi, who suddenly retired from the race when Perez was closing in on Alonso.

    Where the front runners and occasional midfield drivers were concerned, in terms of setting the pace in the closing stages of the race, Raikkonen had his time to shine on lap 51 as he topped the timesheets from fifth place with a lap of 1:41.040secs. Webber went on to better this though by a small margin as he set the fastest time on lap 53 with a 1:41.017secs.

    On the other hand, those setting the pace were not in the same position as Alonso, who was on course to pick up the victory as the midfield scraps continued until the chequered flag.

    There was a three way battle between Vergne who was ahead in eighth place, Hulkenberg came next in ninth place, ahead of Maldonado who was on the tail end of the scrap. As Maldonado appeared to pick up the pace on lap 53, he was running well and gradually catching Hulkenberg. Sadly, on the penultimate lap Maldonado had a smoking engine which resulted in him falling down the field and he finished in 18th place. When Maldonado appeared vulnerable this led the way for Schumacher to pass by and collect the final top 10 point scoring position. Maldonado was sensible when his engine went though as he swiftly retreated to the pits at the end of the race.

    As well as Maldonado’s miserable end to the Grand Prix, Vettel could sympathise as he shared a similar fate. There were reports via the team radio for Vettel to retire from the race on the penultimate lap, as his engine was about to give way and then there was an instruction for him to keep going until the end. As a result of the final decision to nurse his car until he crossed the line, he slipped down the field and ended up finishing in 11th place just out of a point scoring position.

    While the top three drivers in the form of Alonso, Perez and Hamilton took centre stage on the podium, the rest of the field crossed the line to take their final positions. Webber narrowly missed out on a podium finish as he picked up fourth place ahead of Raikkonen. Senna drove a solid race and put some daredevil manoeuvres into practice, which resulted in a very well deserved sixth place finish and he managed to pip Di Resta to it in the end. As one of the rookies in the field this season, Vergne did exceptionally well to pick up eighth place for himself. While Di Resta’s German team mate, Hulkenberg just got ahead of Schumacher to score a few more points in ninth place. As a result of being beaten by his team mate results wise, Ricciardo could only manage to secure 12th place at the end of the Grand Prix. Rosberg also suffered the same fate as he too lost out to his team mate, and lines up alongside Ricciardo to secure 13th place overall. Button is the third driver in this trio to miss out on the points and end up with his team mate getting ahead. He finished the race just behind Rosberg to take 14th position. Massa is another one in the line-up on unfamiliar territory as he slipped down the grid and came in 15th place. While Petrov, who appeared to keep himself out of the limelight quietly crossed the line to take 16th position ahead of Marussia’s Glock. Petrov’s Finnish team mate, Kovalainen was the other side of the German, as he secured 18th place for himself. Maldonado ended up way down the field after his engine blew on the penultimate lap, which resulted in his 19th place in the final standings. While Glock’s French team mate, Pic got ahead of the two Hispania Racing cars to take 20th place. Karthikeyan was the second to last driver to finish the race of the 22 that did. In the process of picking up 21st place, Karthikeyan beat his team mate as well. With this in mind, De la Rosa had to settle for the 22nd and final place in the line up.

    Vitaly Petrov, Caterham
    Vitaly Petrov, Caterham

    Photo by: Motorsport.com

     

    As only two drivers retired from the race it meant that a few more have got some points to their name. In terms of the Drivers’ Standings, Button has inevitably lost his initial first place from the win in Australia and now holds third place with 25 points. Alonso is promoted into the top spot with 35 points to his name, and Hamilton is in the middle with 20 points at present. There is only one point between Button and Webber, who has 24 points in fourth place as the Standings indicate. Following Perez’s exceptional effort in today’s race, he is in fifth place and just two points behind Webber. Meanwhile, Vettel is slightly out of the picture at the moment, and he holds 18 points to his name in sixth place. Raikkonen also managed to pick up some points and has 16 points after the first two races. Senna and Kobayashi are currently tied on eight points in eighth and ninth place respectively. Di Resta comes next as also being a point scorer already this season. The Scotsman has seven points at present in 10th place. After getting into the top 10 by the end of the race, Vergne has been rewarded with four points, and his team mate Ricciardo is next with two points in 12th place. Hulkenberg also has two points like Ricciardo but is just behind him in 13th place and Schumacher is the last of the current point scorers in 14th place with one point.

    Where the Constructors’ early battle is concerned, McLaren Mercedes have 55 points at the top, and Red Bull trails them in second place with 42 points at present. Ferrari come next in the line-up with 35 points so far, and Sauber are just sitting below them in fourth place with 30 points. Lotus-Renault are making steady progress in fifth position with 16 points and are in front of Force India who have nine points at present. Williams are just one point below Force India and they are in seventh place. Of the final two teams that have picked up some points after just two races, Toro Rosso are leading from Mercedes, and have six points at the moment, while the latter have gained one point from today’s last minute result in the top 10 with Schumacher.

    After a very memorable 2012 Malaysian Grand Prix, which was affected by the weather and led to a safety car situation, and was then suspended until the conditions improved, the new season is already delivering mixed results and some of which go right down to the penultimate and final laps of the race. It appears that together with the developments on the new cars and changes in the rules and regulations, there is no clear winner in terms of driver or team in a race yet as they are starting to find their feet. Consequently, this makes way for an exciting time as the rest of the season plays out. It seems that there is no significant divide either between the usual front runners, who now find themselves elsewhere in the field and vice versa. The Formula One fraternity now have a period of just three weeks, in which they can recover from an eventful race that took place this weekend. They will also see it even more so as a time to prepare for their next challenge, as the teams and drivers put their rivalry into action for the Chinese Grand Prix.

    (0 votes)
    Yesterday at 12:23pm

    Copyright.2012. Motorsport.com All Rights reserved
  • Mangled Horses, Maimed Jockeys

    BREAKDOWN | DEATH AND DISARRAY AT AMERICA’S RACETRACKS

    Mangled Horses, Maimed Jockeys

    The new economics of horse racing are making an always-dangerous game even more so, as lax oversight puts animal and rider at risk.

     

    By WALT BOGDANICHJOE DRAPE, DARA L. MILES and GRIFFIN PALME

     

     

    The Comeback and the Fall

    Tommy Moreno

    Jake Schoellkopf/Associated Press

    Belinda Soileau

    Andrea Caudill/Q-Racing Journal

    Equibase

    Marcus Yam for The New York Times

     

    Jacky Martin, a Hall of Fame jockey, returned to riding in 2010 at Ruidoso Downs Race Track in New Mexico. He had been banned from racing for four years after being put on probation for drug possession and poaching deer. By the time the racing season was half over that summer, he had become the top winner and champion jockey at Ruidoso for the year.

     

     

    Jakob Schiller for The New York Times

    A 2-year-old quarter horse named Teller All Gone broke a front leg in a race on Sept. 3 at Ruidoso Downs Race Track in New Mexico and was euthanized. His body was then dumped in a junkyard next to an old toilet at Ruidoso, a short walk from where he had been sold at auction the previous year.2-year-old horse, Teller All Gone. He was euthanized, and then dumped near an old toilet in a junkyard a short walk from where he had been sold at auction the previous year.

    In the next 24 hours, two fearful jockeys refused their assigned mounts. The track honored two other riders who had died racing. As doctors fought to save Mr. Martin’s life, a sign went up next to the track tote board: “Hang in there, Jacky. We love you.”

     

    On average, 24 horses die each week at racetracks across America. Many are inexpensive horses racing with little regulatory protection in pursuit of bigger and bigger prizes. These deaths often go unexamined, the bodies shipped to rendering plants and landfills rather than to pathologists who might have discovered why the horses broke down.

    In 2008, after a Kentucky Derby horse, Eight Belles, broke two ankles on national television and was euthanized, Congress extracted promises from the racing industry to make its sport safer. While safety measures like bans on anabolic steroids have been enacted, assessing their impact has been difficult because many tracks do not keep accurate accident figures or will not release them.

    But an investigation by The New York Times has found that industry practices continue to put animal and rider at risk. A computer analysis of data from more than 150,000 races, along with injury reports, drug test results and interviews, shows an industry still mired in a culture of drugs and lax regulation and a fatal breakdown rate that remains far worse than in most of the world.

     

    If anything, the new economics of racing are making an always-dangerous game even more so. Faced with a steep loss of customers, racetracks have increasingly added casino gambling to their operations, resulting in higher purses but also providing an incentive for trainers to race unfit horses. At Aqueduct Racetrack in Queens, the number of dead and injured horses has risen sharply since a casino opened there late last year.

    Mr. Martin’s injury occurred in a state with the worst safety record for racetracks, a place where most trainers who illegally pump sore horses full of painkillers to mask injury — and then race them — are neither fined nor suspended and owners of those drugged horses usually keep their winnings.

    The failure of regulators to stop that cheating is reflected in the numbers. Since 2009, records show, trainers at United States tracks have been caught illegally drugging horses 3,800 times, a figure that vastly understates the problem because only a small percentage of horses are actually tested.

    In the same period, according to the Times analysis, 6,600 horses broke down or showed signs of injury. Since 2009, the incident rate has not only failed to go down, it has risen slightly.

    The greatest number of incidents on a single day — 23 — occurred last year on the most celebrated day of racing in America, the running of the Kentucky Derby. One Derby horse fractured a leg, as did a horse in the previous race at Churchill Downs. All told, seven jockeys at other tracks were thrown to the ground after their horses broke down.

    A state-by-state survey by The Times shows that about 3,600 horses died racing or training at state-regulated tracks over the last three years.

     

    In one 13-day stretch of racing in 2010 at Sunland Park Racetrack and Casino in New Mexico, nine horses died racing, five were hauled away in ambulances and two jockeys were hospitalized, one in critical condition.

    “It’s hard to justify how many horses we go through,” said Dr. Rick Arthur, the equine medical director for the California Racing Board. “In humans you never see someone snap their leg off running in the Olympics. But you see it in horse racing.”

    Even some of America’s most prestigious tracks, including Belmont Park, Santa Anita Park and Saratoga Race Course, had incident rates higher than the national average last year, records show.

    Why racehorses break down at such a high rate has been debated for years, but the discussion inevitably comes back to drugs.

    Laboratories cannot yet detect the newest performance-enhancing drugs, while trainers experiment with anything that might give them an edge, including chemicals that bulk up pigs and cattle before slaughter, cobra venom, Viagra, blood doping agents, stimulants and cancer drugs.

    Illegal doping, racing officials say, often occurs on private farms before horses are shipped to the track. Few states can legally test horses there.

    “They are pharmacist shops,” said Dr. George Maylin, the longtime head of New York State’s testing laboratory. “Nobody has any control over what they are doing.”

    Even so, legal therapeutic drugs — pain medicine in particular — pose the greatest risk to horse and rider. In England, where breakdown rates are half of what they are in the United States, horses may not race on any drugs.

    At higher levels, pain medicine can mask injury, rendering prerace examinations less effective. If a horse cannot feel an existing injury, it may run harder than it otherwise would, putting extra stress on the injury. As many as 90 percent of horses that break down had pre-existing injuries, California researchers have found.

     

    “This is just a recipe for disaster,” said Dr. Tom David, who until this year was chief veterinarian for the Louisiana Racing Commission. “Inflamed joints, muscles and mild lameness are masked by medication and therefore undetectable to the examining veterinarian.”

    While high-profile Triple Crown races get the most attention, the mainstay of racing in America is the lower tier, so-called claiming races. Horses in these races are most vulnerable, in part because regulators often give them less protection from potentially dangerous drugs.

    The Times analysis found that horses in claiming races have a 22 percent greater chance of breaking down or showing signs of injury than horses in higher grade races. That lower level of race has been particularly affected by the arrival of casinos.

    At Aqueduct, most of the 16 horses that have died so far this year were in the lower ranks, where purses have increased the fastest because of new casino money.

     

    “It’s hard to watch these poor animals running for their lives for people who could really care less if they live,” said Dr. Margaret Ohlinger, a track veterinarian at Finger Lakes Casino and Racetrack in upstate New York. She performs pre-race inspections and treats horses injured in races but is not responsible for their overall care.

    Last year at the track, Dr. Ohlinger counted 63 dead horses. That, she said, is more than double the fatalities of five years earlier.

    Oversight Undermined

    Race officials have always done their best to hide fatal breakdowns, erecting screens around fallen horses and then refusing to disclose the tracks’ accident rates.

    But amid criticism that individual state racing commissions lacked the will to make the sport safer, and the threat of federal oversight, the industry promised changes, including new restrictions on the use of drugs, a program to accredit racetracks and drug-testing laboratories and uniform rules for punishing drug violators.

    The industry also set up a national database where tracks were asked, but not required, to report injuries with the promise of confidentiality.

    So far, the response to these reform measures has fallen short.

    Fifty-five tracks pledged that they would seek accreditation, requiring among other things prerace inspections and postmortem examinations, or necropsies. Fewer than half have kept their promise.

    “Some tracks do not have the money to spend to meet our standards; others think it’s window dressing and why bother,” said Michael Ziegler, executive director of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association Safety and Integrity Alliance. “Any follow-up with tracks has gone unanswered.”

    The laboratory accreditation program, introduced in July 2009, has fared even worse. After calling the program an “unprecedented” step that “ultimately will change the face of drug testing in this country,” a consortium of industry groups that manages it says not a single lab has been accredited.

    An association of racing regulators wrote to Congress on May 14, 2010, boasting that with the exception of anti-bleeding medicine, “race day medications are not allowed.” Yet records show that in Florida, a major racing state, trainers continue to use corticosteroids, an anti-inflammatory, on race day.

    The national repository for injury reports, maintained by the Jockey Club, the most powerful racing industry group, has been more successful, gathering data from 92 percent of the racing days.

    “We put it into a database, and we provide tools back to the racetracks where they can analyze and slice and dice the information themselves,” said James L. Gagliano, president of the Jockey Club, who says the group has encouraged racetracks to make the statistics public. So far, 24 out of 86 tracks have done so.

    To assess how often horses get injured, The Times bought data for about 150,000 races from 2009 through 2011, then searched for terms indicating that a horse encountered a physical problem, like “broke down,” “lame” or “vanned off.”

    Although the people who chronicle the races, known as chart callers, can be stylistically different, they are taught to use standard industry terms, and their descriptions constitute the official record used by gamblers to evaluate horses.

    The analysis showed that during those three years the rate of incidents for horses in the United States was 5.2 per 1,000 starts.

    By contrast, Woodbine Racetrack in Toronto, which year after year has one of the lowest breakdown rates in North America, had an incident rate of only 1.4, according to the Times analysis. “One of the differences here is medication is not as permissive as it is in the U.S.,” said Jamie Martin, executive vice president of racing at Woodbine.

     

    According to the analysis, five of the six tracks with the highest incident rates last year were in New Mexico. All are casino tracks, commonly called “racinos.” Ruidoso, where Jacky Martin was injured, topped the list in 2011 with 14.1 incidents per 1,000 starts. Ruidoso attributes its incident rate in part to the failure of horses to acclimate quickly to the track’s elevation. Some horses that appeared to be injured, track officials said, may have simply needed time “to catch their breath.”

    Yet no accident over the last three years can match what occurred in a single race on Feb. 29, at Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races in West Virginia. Eight horses started. Seven fell. One finished. Along the way, seven jockeys were left scattered on the ground.

    The next and final race was canceled, not just because it took so long to clear the track, but also because too few jockeys were available or willing to ride.

    Drug Violations

    It was the day’s first race in Hobbs, N.M. The track was fast and the weather clear. Shortly after noon on Oct. 16, 2010, nine young horses were loaded into the starting gate at Zia Park Casino.

    With the finish line a mere 400 yards away, this would be an all-out sprint, horse racing’s equivalent of a drag race. While these races, run by a breed called quarter horses, lack the ebb-and-flow suspense of a longer thoroughbred race, they make up for it in a pure adrenalin rush. The best quarter horses can hit nearly 50 miles an hour.

    Three weeks earlier at Zia Park, Mark Anthony Villa was on the back of a quarter horse when it fell just past the finish line, throwing him to the ground. With a herd of thousand-plus-pound animals bearing down on him, Mr. Villa tried to crawl to safety.

    He never made it. A horse’s hoof struck him in the head with such force that his helmet shot like a bullet across the track. He died within an instant, leaving a wife and twin children.

     

    For years, track veterans could only speculate as to whether racing quarter horses was more dangerous than racing thoroughbreds. In fact, the Times analysis shows that quarter horses have a nearly 29 percent greater chance of breaking down or showing signs of injury.

    With Mr. Villa’s death still on the minds of riders and spectators, a gray 2-year-old colt named I Glance at Chicks settled in the 6 hole waiting for the starting bell. For bettors, he was an animal to watch. The horse had won his only race and was trained by Andres Gonzalez, who, according to racing commission records, was not above allowing his horses to race with extra help. Illegal help.

    A week earlier, another horse trained by Mr. Gonzalez had raced at Zia Park with 12 times the legal limit of a drug that mimicked steroids. By the end of 2011, Mr. Gonzalez would have amassed a dozen drug violations in just four years. His uncle, Ramon O. Gonzalez Sr., for whom he often worked, had his own lengthy list of violations, including accusations that he drugged 10 horses in just two months.

    Whether I Glance at Chicks felt pain as he raced is unknown, but he never challenged for the lead. Shortly after crossing the finish line in fifth place, he broke down. The diagnosis: a bone fracture in his front left leg and ligament damage, injuries from which he could not recover.

    A veterinarian, Dr. Clayton McCook, euthanized the colt with an injection of pentobarbital. Afterward, Dr. McCook wrote a note “to whom it may concern,” expressing his distress to the authorities over this fatal breakdown and others like it.

    “I have had to euthanize several horses due to catastrophic injuries and feel they are occurring in greater numbers than one should expect,” Dr. McCook wrote. “I do not pretend to be an expert in racing surfaces, nor in the training of racehorses, but I do know that something appears to be amiss at Zia Park.”

    According to an analysis of race records, Zia Park in 2010 had the nation’s second-highest incident rate, 13.3. Last year, it ranked fourth with a rate of 11.9. After horse owners complained about the track surface, Zia Park officials said they spent $80,000 resurfacing it before the 2011 racing season.

    During the three days that a Times reporter visited Zia Park last November, eight horses collapsed, died or were transported off the track. At the time, track officials said it was company policy not to allow a reporter access to the backside where trainers stable their horses.

    Christopher McErlean, vice president of racing at Penn National Gaming, which owns Zia Park, said in a statement that the Times analysis used figures “produced by nonmedical professionals for the purpose of handicapping feature races.”

    Mr. McErlean also said some horses are vanned off as a precaution and may not actually have been injured.

    But Zia Park officials said that last year, “a significant number” of horses had to be carried off the track because of exhaustion stemming from the possible abuse of a drug that mimics anabolic steroids as well as “other medication issues.”

    Mr. McErlean said Penn Gaming endorses tougher penalties for those who violate drug rules.

    Without a postmortem exam of I Glance at Chicks, no determination could be made as to whether a pre-existing condition or some other unknown factor might have played a role in his demise. But tests did reveal that the horse had been dosed with a large load of a powerful painkilling medicine called Flunixin.

    In at least two states, 2-year-olds may not race with any Flunixin. Not so in New Mexico, where they can run with up to 50 nanograms of the drug, more than double the amount allowed in a higher class of competition called graded stakes races.

    But even that higher amount was not enough for Mr. Gonzalez. I Glance at Chicks carried 282 nanograms of Flunixin.

    To put that figure in perspective, Dr. Mary Scollay, chief veterinarian for the Kentucky Racing Commission, said she had never seen such high levels in her state.

    “When you look at the history of our medication violations — Flunixin — most are under 50 nanograms, 35 nanograms, something like that,” Dr. Scollay said. In fact, she said she had never seen a violation in Kentucky over 104.

    In New Mexico, it is common practice.

    Tests on horses in New Mexico showed results over 104 nanograms on 68 occasions since 2009, with some registering 1,000 and even 2,400, records show. The levels are so high that regulatory veterinarians in other states say the horses must have been drugged on race day, a practice that is forbidden.

    Before the New Mexico Racing Commission could pass judgment on the overdosing of I Glance at Chicks, another horse trained by Mr. Gonzalez tested positive for even higher levels of Flunixin. The extra dosing did not hurt performance. The horse finished first, and its owner, Mr. Gonzalez’s cousin Ramon Gonzalez Jr., got to keep his winnings.

    If Andres Gonzalez was worried about how the racing commission viewed his treatment of I Glance at Chicks, he need not have been. Records show he received a warning and nothing more.

    Lax Penalties

    New Mexico’s racing industry — the tracks and their regulators — has been unusually slow in responding to the safety alarms.

     

    Four of the state’s five racetracks, including Zia Park and Ruidoso, are unaccredited, and the track where Mr. Martin’s injury occurred does not report accidents or positive drug tests to groups that monitor such events.

    New Mexico also recorded no positive tests in 2010 and 2011 for the most frequently abused pain medicine in racing, phenylbutazone, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory commonly known as “bute.” After The Times asked why none had been found, the new executive director of the state’s racing commission, Vince Mares, said that after researching the question, he discovered that the previous leadership “had cut back on the tests” for financial reasons.

    Without a national law regulating drugs in racing, New Mexico regulators can be as lenient as they wish in disciplining drug violators.

    Trainers in New Mexico who overmedicate horses with Flunixin get a free pass on their first violation, a $200 fine on the second and a $400 fine on the third, records show.

    In Indiana, by contrast, winnings are forfeited after the first drug offense. “If someone who violates the rule thinks the penalties are going to be mild or nonexistent, then breaking the rules is just a cost of doing business,” said Joe Gorajec, the executive director of the Indiana Horse Racing Commission.

    New Mexico gives offenders another break: it wipes away Flunixin violations every 12 months, allowing trainers to again overmedicate horses without penalty. Dozens of huge Flunixin overdoses have resulted in warnings only.

    Sometimes the same horse is illegally drugged twice. On May 9, 2009, Runawayslew, a horse trained by Andres Gonzalez, raced with two anti-inflammatory drugs. Nineteen days later, under another trainer, Runawayslew raced on cocaine.

    To varying degrees, the picture is similar nationwide. Trainers often face little punishment for drug violations, and on the rare occasions when they are suspended, they are allowed to turn their stables over to an assistant. Since January 2005, 116 trainers have had five or more drug violations, and 10 trainers had 10 or more, records show.

    In New Mexico, Cody Kelley, an Albuquerque lawyer who represents people accused of violating racing commission rules, including Andres Gonzalez, said punishments were too arbitrary.

    “Are there people that cheat at horse racing in New Mexico? Yes, happens everywhere,” Mr. Kelley said. “But I think our commission right now is not equipped to deal with it. What we need are national rules.”

    Mr. Mares, the New Mexico racing chief, agrees that his agency needs more uniform penalties to avoid charges of favoritism. “There is an issue of consistency — you can quote me on this,” Mr. Mares said. “It is being addressed.”

    New Mexico recently became the first state to temporarily ban all horses from racing on clenbuterol, a drug that aids respiration, but that has been widely abused because it can build muscle.

    In recent years, the state commission has had its embarrassments.

    One former investigator faces trial on charges of stealing horses while working at the commission. Another trainer’s doping violation was dismissed because the assistant attorney general handling the case neglected to show up in court. And the commission had to drop charges against Ramon O. Gonzalez Sr. for drugging 10 horses because it forgot to file the proper paperwork, according to the state attorney general’s office.

    Nonetheless, odds are slim that any of the Gonzalezes — Andres, Ramon Sr. or Ramon Jr. — will show up at a New Mexico racetrack any time soon. In late January, a federal grand jury in Albuquerque indicted them on charges of participating in a drug trafficking scheme tied to one of Mexico’s most notorious drug cartels. All have pleaded not guilty.

    Andres Gonzalez was arrested at Sunland Park Racetrack and Casino in New Mexico. His uncle, Ramon Sr., was arrested while pulling a horse trailer that the authorities said was carrying 26 kilograms of cocaine and 500 pounds of marijuana.

    Masking Pain, or Healing It

    Breakdowns can be caused by a variety of factors, including poor track surface and jockey mistakes. But drugs, often used to mask existing injuries, are the prime suspect.

    “It’s not that these medications caused the injuries, but the trainers knew the horses were injured and gave them the meds to get them into the race,” said Dr. Arthur, the veterinarian for the California Horse Racing Board.

    Necropsies are considered essential to determining if an existing injury contributed to a fatal breakdown. However, only 11 states require them, a Times survey found.

    In California, where necropsies are required, researchers found that a “large majority” of horses had existing problems at the site of their fatal injuries.

    “To be fair, some of that is microscopic and may not be readily apparent,” Dr. Arthur said. “We’re trying to figure out why vets and trainers are not identifying injuries prior to catastrophic injuries.”

    But many prior ailments are indeed serious. The Times obtained hundreds of necropsy reports on racehorses that died racing in Pennsylvania and found problems that included “severe degenerative joint disease,” “severe chronic osteoarthritis” and pneumonia with “severe, extensive” lung inflammation. One horse had 50 stomach ulcers. Another had just one eye. Pathologists also found metal screws in two horses that had broken bones from previous accidents.

    In the United States, horses are usually allowed to run on some dose of pain medication, usually bute. The question, fiercely debated in the racing community, is at what level do therapeutic drugs make racing unsafe?

    Virginia’s fatality rate went up after regulators in 2005 raised the allowable level of bute to 5 micrograms from 2 micrograms. “Our catastrophic incidents increased significantly,” said Dr. Richard Harden, equine medical director for the state racing commission.

    Virginia returned to the lower level in 2009, though the fatality rate has not come down.

    Iowa’s fatality rate rose by more than 50 percent after the state in 2007 allowed a higher level of bute.

    Regulatory veterinarians say the higher allowable levels make it difficult for them to spot lameness and injury during prerace examinations. In one study, researchers at Oklahoma State University said they found bute in most of the horses that died racing or training at Oklahoma tracks in 2010. Six had both bute and Flunixin, a dangerous practice called “stacking,” the report said.

    The researchers also expressed concern that despite fewer races, a record number of horses died, necessitating a “careful re-evaluation of track surfaces, medication/enforcement and prerace examinations.”

    But prominent owners and trainers, and even some veterinarians, say evidence linking drugs and breakdowns is unconvincing.

    Kent H. Stirling, chairman of the national medication committee for the Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association, said there was “no scientific evidence whatsoever” that 5 micrograms of bute on race day is dangerous.

    Mr. Stirling and others say sore horses should not be denied therapeutic medicine when needed. “If you’re a horseman and you’re trying to keep a horse going and keep him happy and healthy as you can, then these therapeutic medications are very helpful,” he said.

    Regulators typically view prescription drug violations as more benign than the use of banned substances on horses. And they constitute the bulk of the 3,800 violations that The Times found by surveying racing states.

    But others, including racing regulators overseas, say horses should not compete on any drug regardless of type.

    “Therapeutic drugs, by definition, are used for healing and curing,” said Arthur B. Hancock III, whose farm produced three Kentucky Derby winners. “Drugs that mask pain and enhance performance are not ‘therapeutic.’ They are what they are: performance-enhancing drugs.”

    The industry group that runs graded stakes races had promised to ban all therapeutic drugs for 2-year-olds, but in late February backed off, saying it did not have enough time to bring state regulators on board.

    George W. Strawbridge Jr., a prominent breeder and owner, resigned from the group over that decision, calling it “one of the most craven acts” he had seen.

    “How on earth did we get to this sorry state?” Mr. Strawbridge said. “The first reason is that in this country there are no significant consequences for doping horses.”

    Respecting the Ride

    Chris Zamora knows the sensation of riding a sore horse. But one ride in particular stands out.

    On Nov. 25, 2008, Mr. Zamora was guiding his horse, Sinful Heart, into the first turn at Zia Park when he sensed something was wrong. “He didn’t want to take the turn,” he said. “He was in pain.”

    Sinful Heart drifted out, clipped heels with another horse and fell. A trailing horse tripped over them.

    Mr. Zamora, the winner of more than 1,000 races, nearly died in the accident, fracturing his skull, pelvis, ribs and four vertebrae. His lungs collapsed, his liver was lacerated and his heart was compressed. “They had to insert a needle to take the pressure off of my heart,” he said.

    Sinful Heart survived to race three more times, in successively cheaper races, never winning before collapsing and dying on the track at Ruidoso.

    Four months after his accident, in March 2009, Mr. Zamora returned to the track. But he had changed. No more cheap horses. “I tried to ride quality over quantity,” he said. “I didn’t ride a horse that somebody said was already sore. I scratched more of them at that time than I had in my whole life.”

    The best trainers might have been unhappy, he said, but they trusted his judgment and fixed the problem. “They were great horsemen,” Mr. Zamora said, offering the ultimate compliment.

    But not all were. Now, he said, some trainers just go to another rider. “These guys will head a horse up until it breaks down completely, and when there’s a man on top of them, it’s bad,” he said.

    Other injured jockeys tell similar stories. “I think more should be done for the horse to let him heal naturally than to be getting him to the next race so we can get one more race out of him,” said Randy Meier, a winner of more than 4,000 races, many in the Chicago area.

    Along the way, Mr. Meier broke his neck, collarbones, ribs, shoulder, legs, arms, wrist and sternum and developed a brain bleed.

    New Mexico jockeys have been hit particularly hard. Not only was Mr. Villa killed and Mr. Zamora and Mr. Martin critically injured, Juan Campos died in an accident in August 2008; Jimmy Ray Coates fell the same year, his heart stopping twice after breaking his femur, shoulder and collarbone; Carlos Rivas had no pulse en route to the hospital after rupturing his aorta in 2010, and the same year Kelsi Purcell fractured multiple vertebrae in a spill.

    There were other injuries as well.

    “We’ve been through this so many times,” said Terry Meyocks, national manager of the Jockeys’ Guild. More than 50 permanently disabled jockeys receive assistance from the Jockeys’ Guild, he said.

    After Mr. Zamora’s accident, Mr. Martin, a friend and hunting partner, had told him not to abandon hope. “You’ll be back,” he said. “You’re in great shape, it won’t be that long. You’re not done. You won’t be in a walker.”

    Like all jockeys, Mr. Zamora knew the risks of riding. “Every time you do it, you take a chance one is going to break it off. Even with the soundest horse you take a chance.”

    Good jockeys can alter their ride if a horse is sore or about to break down. In some cases, though, there are no hints, no warnings. And that is when jockeys face the greatest danger.

    Jacky Martin had no warning.

    “I thought he was going to die,” said Adrian A. Ramos, who was riding in the same race. “He hit the ground hard, real hard. I was behind him and I saw everything.”

    A Second Chance

     

    The question almost everyone at the track wanted to ask was why. Why did Mr. Martin, at the top of his game, the winner of a record seven All American Futurities, agree to ride a cheap claiming horse with no victories just three days before he was to ride the favorite in the $2.4 million Futurity?

    The favorite did eventually win and would have paid him $120,000, the jockey’s standard share. For riding the horse that broke his neck, Mr. Martin took home little more than the cost of a tank of gas.

    Until that wrenching moment in the Ruidoso dirt, Mr. Martin at age 56 had been on a redemptive journey to right the wrongs in his life, to help younger jockeys avoid the mistakes he had made and to regain what he had lost: an opportunity to sit atop a racehorse and to coax from it all the power it was willing to give, and nothing more.

    For four years, Mr. Martin had been barred from racing after being sentenced to probation in 2006 for poaching deer and possessing less than a gram of methamphetamine. He and his wife, Tracey, also his agent, moved to Louisiana. “I worked horses every day for three and a half years being a gallop boy,” Mr. Martin said. “That’s all I was, a $10 gallop boy.”

    In the afternoon, Mr. Martin helped to build fences and even a barn, his wife recounted. “We actually bagged horse manure and sold it and delivered it just to get through,” she said.

    It was a steep fall for a man so highly revered in the sport that Mexican businessmen would send armed guards to escort him to high-stakes races south of the border.

    “After a time, he took ownership for the wrong things that he did and worked his way through it,” Ms. Martin said. Just as important, friends say, he developed an even deeper appreciation for the role others played in racing, from grooms to horse owners struggling to stay in the game.

    In the summer of 2010, Mr. Martin was finally cleared to race, and he returned to Ruidoso unsure of how he would be received. When word spread that “Jacky was back,” owners were eager to extend a helping hand, but most of all, they were eager to win.

    And win he did. With the racing season half over, Mr. Martin stormed into the lead to become the top winner and champion jockey for 2010.

    “He was so grateful he got a second chance,” Ms. Martin said in December. “He was on the radio saying: ‘People out there need to know that they can be forgiven and succeed. If I can fix my screwed up life, you can too.’ ”

    In Mr. Martin’s quest to win an eighth Futurity in 2010, his horse lost by a nose in one of the biggest upsets in the history of that race. But the loss did not diminish the joy he felt competing again.

    “It’s just a fairy tale for it to turn out the way it has,” Mr. Martin told a racing publication in 2010.

    Mr. Martin fell a year later, on the Friday before Labor Day at the beginning of the final, biggest weekend of racing at Ruidoso. The tens of thousands of spectators, who would later fill the stands and line the distant highway with parked cars, had yet to arrive.

    Only a small, quiet crowd, including relatives of riders, trainers and owners, was on hand to watch Mr. Martin go down. One woman screamed because she mistakenly thought her husband had been the one injured.

    The authorities did little to determine why Mr. Martin’s horse, Phire Power, broke down. The commission said drug tests found no prohibited substances, but the scope of those tests is unclear, including whether the horse was tested for bute. The state also said the horse’s body did not undergo any postmortem exam before it was destroyed.

    Within minutes, Ms. Martin was escorted onto the track to be with her fallen husband. Over the next six months, she would rarely leave his side.

    In two days, Mr. Martin had been scheduled to sign autographs at Ruidoso to raise money for injured jockeys. Instead, other jockeys signed autographs to raise money for him.

    Since the accident, Mr. Martin has been in and out of hospitals in three cities. He has suffered through infections, pneumonia, nausea, weight loss, bed sores and other problems. He remains paralyzed, unable to move his arms or legs. He breathes with a respirator.

    Meanwhile, the racing community has rallied to his side, sending not only words of support but also money to help defray his mounting health care costs. Ruidoso’s owner, R. D. Hubbard, promised $100,000. There have been silent auctions and other fund-raisers. His wife worries that it may not be enough.

    Through it all, Mr. Martin refuses to feel sorry for himself.

    In December, as he struggled to breathe in a Houston hospital, he told a reporter softly that he had no regrets.

    “It’s a bad deal,” he said. “But if I could do it again, I would be right out there doing it. I ride horses. It’s the risk every jockey takes.”

    Back home in El Paso, Ms. Martin says her husband derives one of his few pleasures from sitting in his wheelchair next to a window watching horses train silently in the distance.

    Mr. Martin’s injury deeply affected Mr. Zamora. He was not only losing a friend from the jock’s room, the sport was losing a rider, a gentleman, who had come to represent the best it had to offer.

    “He rode the best horses in the world, but he was worthy of the best horses in the world,” Mr. Zamora said. “He had great hands. He let a runner be a runner instead of going to the whip too early. Them animals loved him, and they ran for him and he understood them. When one didn’t want to run, he let ’em not run. He didn’t take to the whip. You have to understand them — that’s what makes a great horseman. And he was. He was special.”

    Last fall, several weeks after Mr. Martin’s spill, Mr. Zamora left the jock’s room for the last time.

    “I knew I had come so close, and I couldn’t deal with that.”

    Pain, Up Close

    It was the third race at Ruidoso on July 11, 2009.

    In the stands, Laura and Armando Alvarado sat with their two grandchildren, ages 11 and 14.

    The Alvarados were not racing fans, but this was a vacation — they had driven up to the mountain resort from El Paso — and they thought their grandchildren might enjoy watching their first horse race.

    Mr. Alvarado took the children down to the rail for a closer look. Ten horses sprinted out of the gate, including a gray Texas-bred quarter horse named Sinful Heart, the same horse that fell several months earlier, nearly killing Chris Zamora.

    Just past the finish line, Sinful Heart, with another rider on its back, broke down, collapsing on the track. “The horse is bleeding!” one of the children cried out.

    The children were not visibly shaken, but Ms. Alvarado said she was sorry they had to witness death at such a close range. After a few more races, they went shopping.

    Five days later, a relative with a passion for racing was visiting the Alvarados, and they all went to the track.

    “It was going to be an all-day experience, and I thought how nice to have this man give them all this history and details,” Ms. Alvarado said.

    Once again, Mr. Alvarado took the children to the rail to watch the finish of the day’s first race.

    This time, a horse broke its leg, pitching its rider — who happened to be Chris Zamora — into the ground, where rider and animal rolled like tumbleweeds across the finish line.

    “It was awful,” Mr. Alvarado said. Although Mr. Zamora was not seriously injured, the horse was. “The bone was showing through the skin,” Mr. Alvarado said.

    Both children began to cry. “I have never seen anything that horrible close up,” Mr. Alvarado said. “The kids were terrified.”

    The horse was euthanized on the track. The family quickly left the premises. Ms. Alvarado said: “I told Armando, just drive. We wanted to get out of there.”

    Afterward, her granddaughter said, “I don’t want to go to a racetrack ever again.”

    Ms. Alvarado wrote a letter to the editor of the local paper.

    “For the sake of the animals and children, we felt compelled to let city officials, agencies and others know of this painful experience and urge you to investigate,” she wrote.

    She said she sent copies of the letter to the mayor, the track, its chief veterinarian, the Humane Society and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

    Ms. Alvarado expected a response.

    She never got one, she said.

     

    Rebecca R. Ruiz and Matthew Orr contributed reporting from New York.

     

    A version of this article appeared in print on March 25, 2012, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Mangled Horses, Maimed Jockeys.

     

     

     

     

     
     

     
     
     

    A Jockey’s Story

    Jockeys are on the front lines of the risky business of horse racing. Twenty-four horses a week die at racetracks around the country.

    Video by Matthew Orr/Th

     

  • Why Bilinguals Are Smarter

    Harriet Russel

     

    March 17, 2012
     

    Why Bilinguals Are Smarter

    By 

    SPEAKING two languages rather than just one has obvious practical benefits in an increasingly globalized world. But in recent years, scientists have begun to show that the advantages of bilingualism are even more fundamental than being able to converse with a wider range of people. Being bilingual, it turns out, makes you smarter. It can have a profound effect on your brain, improving cognitive skills not related to language and even shielding against dementia in old age.

    This view of bilingualism is remarkably different from the understanding of bilingualism through much of the 20th century. Researchers, educators and policy makers long considered a second language to be an interference, cognitively speaking, that hindered a child’s academic and intellectual development.

    They were not wrong about the interference: there is ample evidence that in a bilingual’s brain both language systems are active even when he is using only one language, thus creating situations in which one system obstructs the other. But this interference, researchers are finding out, isn’t so much a handicap as a blessing in disguise. It forces the brain to resolve internal conflict, giving the mind a workout that strengthens its cognitive muscles.

    Bilinguals, for instance, seem to be more adept than monolinguals at solving certain kinds of mental puzzles. In a 2004 study by the psychologists Ellen Bialystok and Michelle Martin-Rhee, bilingual and monolingual preschoolers were asked to sort blue circles and red squares presented on a computer screen into two digital bins — one marked with a blue square and the other marked with a red circle.

    In the first task, the children had to sort the shapes by color, placing blue circles in the bin marked with the blue square and red squares in the bin marked with the red circle. Both groups did this with comparable ease. Next, the children were asked to sort by shape, which was more challenging because it required placing the images in a bin marked with a conflicting color. The bilinguals were quicker at performing this task.

    The collective evidence from a number of such studies suggests that the bilingual experience improves the brain’s so-called executive function — a command system that directs the attention processes that we use for planning, solving problems and performing various other mentally demanding tasks. These processes include ignoring distractions to stay focused, switching attention willfully from one thing to another and holding information in mind — like remembering a sequence of directions while driving.

    Why does the tussle between two simultaneously active language systems improve these aspects of cognition? Until recently, researchers thought the bilingual advantage stemmed primarily from an ability for inhibition that was honed by the exercise of suppressing one language system: this suppression, it was thought, would help train the bilingual mind to ignore distractions in other contexts. But that explanation increasingly appears to be inadequate, since studies have shown that bilinguals perform better than monolinguals even at tasks that do not require inhibition, like threading a line through an ascending series of numbers scattered randomly on a page.

    The key difference between bilinguals and monolinguals may be more basic: a heightened ability to monitor the environment. “Bilinguals have to switch languages quite often — you may talk to your father in one language and to your mother in another language,” says Albert Costa, a researcher at the University of Pompeu Fabra in Spain. “It requires keeping track of changes around you in the same way that we monitor our surroundings when driving.” In a study comparing German-Italian bilinguals with Italian monolinguals on monitoring tasks, Mr. Costa and his colleagues found that the bilingual subjects not only performed better, but they also did so with less activity in parts of the brain involved in monitoring, indicating that they were more efficient at it.

    The bilingual experience appears to influence the brain from infancy to old age (and there is reason to believe that it may also apply to those who learn a second language later in life).

    In a 2009 study led by Agnes Kovacs of the International School for Advanced Studies in Trieste, Italy, 7-month-old babies exposed to two languages from birth were compared with peers raised with one language. In an initial set of trials, the infants were presented with an audio cue and then shown a puppet on one side of a screen. Both infant groups learned to look at that side of the screen in anticipation of the puppet. But in a later set of trials, when the puppet began appearing on the opposite side of the screen, the babies exposed to a bilingual environment quickly learned to switch their anticipatory gaze in the new direction while the other babies did not.

    Bilingualism’s effects also extend into the twilight years. In a recent study of 44 elderly Spanish-English bilinguals, scientists led by the neuropsychologist Tamar Gollan of the University of California, San Diego, found that individuals with a higher degree of bilingualism — measured through a comparative evaluation of proficiency in each language — were more resistant than others to the onset of dementia and other symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease: the higher the degree of bilingualism, the later the age of onset.

    Nobody ever doubted the power of language. But who would have imagined that the words we hear and the sentences we speak might be leaving such a deep imprint?

    Yudhijit Bhattacharjee is a staff writer at Science.

    This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

    Correction: March 20, 2012

     

    An earlier version of this article misspelled the name of a university in Spain. It is Pompeu Fabra, not Pompea Fabra.

     


    Copyright. 2912. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved

  • Lewis Hamilton is fastest in both practice sessions at Sepang

    Lewis Hamilton, Malaysian GP

    23 March 2012Last updated at 08:03 GMT

    Lewis Hamilton is fastest in both practice sessions at Sepang

    By Andrew BensonChief F1 writer

    McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton was in impressive form in Friday practice at the Malaysian Grand Prix.

    The 2008 world champion was fastest in both sessions, heading Sebastian Vettel of Red Bull in the first and Mercedes‘ Michael Schumacher in the second.

    Hamilton’s team-mate Jenson Button was third fastest in the second session.

    Continue reading the main story

    I was quite happy with the balance of thecar, I’ve made some changes since the last race but obviously it can always be better

    Lewis Hamilton

    McLaren’s performance underlined the form they showed in winning the opening race in Australia last weekend, with Button ahead of Vettel and Hamilton.

    Hamilton, who was disappointed in Australia to finish third after starting on pole position, said: “It was a good day for me, I was quite happy with the balance of the car, I’ve made some changes since the last race but obviously it can always be better.

    “Its the set-up and different characteristics. I had a different wing on for the last race which I hadn’t used for a year.

    “I thought it would be better but in high-speed corners it was too much for the race. In qualifying it was good.

    “I made a step backwards this race and [made] a couple of other changes, roll stiffness and ride-height. Hopefully they have helped.”

    Red Bull appeared to be struggling to keep up, just as they were in Australia.

    Vettel complained over the team radio that his car was “undriveable” in the afternoon, when he was 10th fastest and team-mate Mark Webber seventh.

    However, Button said that was an illusion.

    “I think it’s going to be unbelievably competitive,” he said.

    “The Lotus will be quick and so will the Red Bulls. If you look at their times today they are competitive and they are consistent.”

    Vettel said: “I’m not entirely happy. I would love to be higher up but all in all we had decent running . There is still a lot to do. It’s not as though we expected all our problems to be solved in three hours.

    “We are sliding a bit too much and I would love the car to be more predictable and stable in the beginning.

    Image of Gary AndersonGary AndersonBBC F1 technical analyst

    “The McLaren tyres look pretty good – the Mercedes tyres are a bit more suspect. Ferrari had bad pick-up problems on the tyres in the morning, but watching Alonso come back in after his long run in the afternoon, they were the best I’ve seen. Maybe we are seeing a bit of a revival from Ferrari.

    “Webber came in after a fairly long run and the inside shoulder of the rear tyres looked fairly tatty. Red Bull have changed the front and rear torsion bars and the rear ride-height on his car. That’s more than I’ve seen Red Bull change their car mechanically than over the last two years.”

    “McLaren looked very strong, no doubt. I think we are closer on long-run pace so we’ll see what we can do.”

    Hamilton’s time in the morning session – when he was 0.514secs quicker than second-placed Vettel – was the fastest of the day.

    Hamilton was 0.361 seconds ahead of Mercedes driver Michael Schumacher in the second session and 0.514secs ahead of Red Bull’s Sebastian Vettel in the first.

    The times did not come as easily in the second session as teams began to concentrate on race preparation.

    But Hamilton eventually got down to within 0.051secs of his morning time – despite complaining that he had been held up by slower cars on his fastest lap.

    Mercedes again looked impressive – Schumacher and Nico Rosberg were third and fourth fastest in the morning session and second and fourth in the afternoon.

    The team are a strong tip for a front-row qualifying position on Saturday as a result of their controversial use of the front wing in concert with the rear-wing DRS overtaking aid.

    But Schumacher said he did not think he would be able to fight for pole.

    “It would be optimistic to say so,” he said. “I think we are going to be fighting for fifth position.”

    Ferrari looked uncompetitive in the morning session, with Felipe Massa and Fernando Alonso 13th and 15th fastest.

    But Alonso improved his pace in the second session, when he was running a new front wing design, to take sixth place behind the Toro Rosso of Australian Daniel Ricciardo.

    MALAYSIAN GRAND PRIX 2012, DAY TWO

    • Saturday, 24 March: Practice 0500-0600. Qualifying 0800. Live commentary on BBC Radio 5 live. Live text and audio commentary on BBC Sport website. Extended highlights on BBC Two 1300-1415

    MALAYSIAN GRAND PRIX 2012, DAY THREE

    • Sunday, 25 March: Race 0900. Live commentary on 5 live. Live text and audio commentary on BBC Sport website. Extended highlights on BBC One at 1445-1645

  • 10 Reasons The Rest Of The World Thinks The U.S. Is Nuts

     

    Soraya Chemaly

    Feminist, Satirist, and Media Critic

     

     

     

    This week the Georgia State Legislature debated a bill in the House that would make it necessary for some women to carry stillborn or dying fetuses until they ‘naturally’ go into labor. In arguing for this bill Representative Terry England described his empathy for pregnant cows and pigs in the same situation.

    I have a question for Terry England, Sam Brownback, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry and too many others: I have three daughters, two of them twins. If one of my twins had been stillborn would you have made me carry her to term, thereby endangering both the other twin and me? Or, would you have insisted that the state order a mandatory fetal extraction of the living twin fetus from my womb so that I could continue to carry the stillborn one to term and possibly die myself? My family is curious and since you believe my uterus is your public property, I am, too.

    Mr. England, unlike the calves and pigs for which you expressed so much empathy, I am not a beast of burden. I am a woman and I have these human rights:

    The right to life.
    The right to privacy.
    The right to freedom.
    The right to bodily integrity.
    The right to decide when and how I reproduce.

    Mr. England, you and your friends do not get to trade these rights, while “dog and hog hunting,” in return for a young man’s chickens.

    My human rights outweigh any you or the state corruptly and cynically seek to assign to a mass of dividing cells that will eventually turn into a ‘natural’ person. Personhood-for-zygote based bills and related legislation, like Georgia’s and hundreds of others, bills and laws that criminalize pregnancy and abortion and penalize women for being women, violate my human rights.

    Just because you cannot get pregnant does not mean I cannot think clearly, ethically, morally, rationally about my body, human life or the consequences of my actions. Just because you cannot get pregnant does not mean that I do not have rights when I am pregnant. I have responsibility but am powerless. You have power but are irresponsible with my rights.

    By not trusting me, you force me to trust you. And YOU are not trustworthy.

    I gestate humans, you do not. I know how it feels to be pregnant. You do not. I know what happens to a fetus in a womb. You do not. I have carried three fetuses to term. You have not. What I experience when I am pregnant is not empathy. It is permeability. The fetus is me. And the state is you, apparently. But, no matter what you say or do I have fundamental human rights. What makes you think that you, who cannot have this fully human experience, can tell me anything about gestation or how I experience it? Especially when you compare my existence and experience to that of brutish animals.

    The rest of the civilized world thinks this country has lost its mind. It’s no wonder. Look at this list of frenzied misogyny:

    1. Making women carry still-born fetuses to full term because cows and pigs do. This week, Mr England, you supported a bill, the net effect of which, taken tandem with other restrictions, will result in doctors and women being unable to make private, medically-based, critical care decisions and some women being effectively forced to carry their dead or dying fetuses. Women are different from farm animals, Mr. England, and this bill, requiring a woman to carry a dead or dying fetus is inhumane and unethical. By forcing a woman to do this, you are violating her right not to be subjected to inhuman treatment and tortured. And, yes, involuntarily carrying a dead fetus to term, although not torture to you or to a pig, is torture for a woman. It is also a violation of her bodily integrity and a threat to her life and as such violates her right to life.

    2. Consigning women to death to save a fetus. Abortions save women’s lives. “Let women die” bills are happening all over the country. There is no simple or pretty way to put this. Every day, all over the world, women die because they do not have access to safe abortions. Yet, here we are, returning to the dark ages of maternal sacrifice. Do really have to type this sentence: this is a violation of women’s fundamental right to life.

    3. Criminalizing pregnancy and miscarriages and arresting, imprisoning and charging women who miscarry with murder, like Rennie Gibbs in Mississippi or at least 40 other similar cases in Alabama or like Bei Bei Shuai, a woman who is now imprisoned, is charged with murder after trying to commit suicide while pregnant. Pregnant women are becoming a special class subject to “special” laws that infringe on their fundamental rights.

    4. Forcing women to undergo involuntary vaginal penetration (otherwise called rape) with a condom-covered, six- to eight-inch ultrasound probePennsylvania is currently considering that option along with 11 other states. Trans-vaginal ultrasounds undertaken without a woman’s consent are rape according to the legal definition of the word. This violates a woman’s bodily integrity and also constitutes torture when used, as states are suggesting, as a form of control and oppression. Women have the right not to be raped by the state.

    5. Disabling women or sacrificing their lives by either withholding medical treatment or forcing women to undergo involuntary medical procedures. We impose an unequal obligation on women to sacrifice their bodily integrity for another. For example, as in Tysiac v. Poland, in which a mother of two, became blind after her doctor refused to perform an abortion that she wanted that would have halted the course of a degenerative eye disease. If my newborn baby is in need of a kidney and you have a spare matching one, can I enact legislation that says the state can take yours and give it to her? No. We do not force people to donate their organs to benefit others, even those who have already been born. One of the most fundamental of all human rights is that humans be treated equally before the law. Denying a woman this right is a violation of her equal right to this protection.

    6. Giving zygotes “personhood” rights while systematically stripping women of their fundamental rights. There is too much to say about the danger of personhood ideas creeping into health policy to do it here. But, consider what happens to a woman whose womb is not considered the “best” environment for a gestating fetus in a world of personhood-for-zygote legislation: who decides the best environment — the state, her insurance company, her employer, her rapist who decides he really, really wants to be a father? Anyone but a woman.

    7. Inhibiting, humiliating and punishing women for their choices to have an abortion for any reason by levying taxes specifically on abortion, including abortions sought by rape victims to end their involuntary insemination, imposing restrictive requirements like 24 hour wait periods and empowering doctors to lie to female patients about their fetuses in order to avoid prosecution. In Arizona, Kansas, Texas, Virginia, Colorado, Arkansas and other states around the country bills that make women “pay” for their choices are abounding.

    8. Allowing employers to delve into women’s private lives and only pay for insurance when they agree, for religious reasons, with how she choses to use birth control. InArizona, which introduced such a bill this week, this means covering payment for birth control as a benefit only when a woman has proven that she will not use it to control her own reproduction (ie. as birth control). As much as I am worried about women and families in Arizona though, I am more worried about those in Alabama. You see, as recently revealed in a public policy poll in Alabama, conservative, evangelicals who support “personhood” related “pro-life” legislation and are fighting for their “religious liberty” — 21 percent think interracial marriage should be illegal. So, what if they decide that an employee involved in an interracial marriage should not, by divine mandate, reproduce? Do they switch and provide birth control for this employee? Do they make contraception a necessary term of employment for people in interracial marriages? This violates a woman’s right to privacy. My womb is one million times more private than your bedrooms, gentlemen.

    9. Sacrificing women’s overall health and the well-being of their families in order to stop them from exercising their fundamental human right to control their own bodies and reproduction. Texas just did that when it turned down $35million dollars in federal funds thereby ensuring that 300,000 low-income and uninsured Texas women will have no or greatly-reduced access to basic preventive and reproductive health care.

    10. Depriving women of their ability to earn a living and support themselves and their families. Bills, like this one in Arizona, allow employers to fire women for using contraception. Women like these are being fired for not.

    You presume to consign my daughters and yours to function as reproductive animals.

    This is about sex and property, not life and morality. Sex because when women have sex and want to control their reproduction that threatens powerful social structures that rely on patriarchal access to and control over women as reproductive engines. Which brings us to property: control of reproduction was vital when the agricultural revolution took place and we, as a species, stopped meandering around plains in search of food. Reproduction and control of it ensured that a man could possess and consolidate wealth-building and food-producing land and then make sure it wasn’t disaggregated by passing it on to one son he knew was his — largely by claiming a woman and her gestation capability as property, too.

    This is not about freedom of religion. If it were, we would, for example, allow Christian Scientists to refuse to pay for coverage of life-saving blood transfusions for employees. Religious freedom means I get to chose whether or not to be religious and if so, how. It does not mean that I get to impose my religion on others. Paying for insurance is part of the way we compensate employees, even when they use their insurance in ways we don’t agree with and are in contravention of our own personal beliefs. I think that it is stupid, dangerous and immoral to chain smoke, especially around children whose lungs it irreparably harms. But, I still have to pay for an employee to have access to lung scans, nicotine patches and oxygen tanks. I do not get to say that my religious beliefs, which include keeping bodies as healthy as possible, make it possible for me to withhold payment of this employee’s insurance. Guaranteed coverage of contraception and reproductive health care has overwhelming benefits for society, including reducing unwanted pregnancies and abortions. By inserting your religious beliefs so egregiously into government legislation and my life, you are imposing your religious beliefs on me. You don’t like mandated insurance coverage for basic reproductive health humans with two X chromosomes? I don’t like being bred by state compulsion like Mr. England’s farm animals. I have a MORAL OBJECTION to being treated like an animal and not a human. You do not have to use contraception, you do not have to use birth control. But, that does not mean you have any right to tell me that I cannot if I chose. That is my right.

    Property, control, sex, reproduction, morality, defining what is human. Sounds a lot like issues surrounding slavery 170 years ago. It is no surprise that of the 16 states that never repealed theiranti-miscegenation laws, but rather had them overturned by the Supreme Court in 1967 more than half have introduced personhood bills. Like anti-miscegentation laws, anti-choice laws and bills that humiliate women, that treat them like beasts, that violate their bodily autonomy, are based on ignorance, entitlement and arrogance. These laws are not about “personhood” but “humanity.” That women of color are massively, disproportionately affected by these assaults on their bodies and rights should also come as no surprise – their rights and their bodies have always been the most vulnerable assault.

    This is about keeping women’s wombs public and in other people’s control — the exact opposite of private and in their own control.

    And, yes, I do know how complicated the ethics, bioethics and legal arguments related to these decisions are. You, apparently, do not. If you were truly concerned with sustaining life and improving its quality or in protecting innocent children, you would begin by having compassion and empathy for living, born people that require and deserve your attention. You feed them, educate them, lift them from poverty and misery. You do not compound these problems as you are with twisted interpretations of divine will. Only after that do you have the moral legitimacy to entertain the notion of talking to me about my uterus and what I do with it. By then, fully functional artificial wombs should be available and you can implant your own, since you are so fond of animal analogies, as was completed with this male mouse. What you are doing is disgraceful, hypocritical and morally corrupt.

    And, no, I am not crazy. I am angry.

    Mr. Santorum, Mr. England and Mr. Brownback and Mr. Perry you should consider not clinging so dangerously and perversely to the Agrarian Revolution ideas. Birth control and safe abortions are life-saving technologies. These archaic bills and laws, wasteful of time, money and lives, obscure an enduring and unchangeable truth: safe and effective family planning is the transformative social justice accomplishment of the 20th century. They will not go away. This is a revolution, too.

    In a 1851 speech in which she argued for equal rights for women, Sojourner Truth said the following: “The poor men seems to be all in confusion, and don’t know what to do. Why children, if you have woman’s rights, give it to her and you will feel better. You will have your own rights, and they won’t be so much trouble.”

    Do you, Terry England, Sam Brownback, Rick Santorum and friends even know who Sojourner Truth is?

    This post has been updated since its original publication.

     

     

    Copyright. 2012. Huffington Post. All Rights Reserved

  • The Road to the Round of 16 Included a Bloody Brawl

    Al Behrman/Associated Press

    Cincinnati’s Ge’Lawn Guyn was held back by his teammates during the fight.

     

     

    Al Behrman/Associated Press

    Xavier’s Tu Holloway went nose to nose with Cincinnati’s Guyn

     

    March 21, 2012
     

    The Road to the Round of 16 Included a Bloody Brawl

    By ROBERT WEINTRAUB

    One player lay at midcourt, blood pouring off his face. Another was throwing punches at every opponent he could see. A third stood on the scorer’s table, egging on a howling crowd at the Cintas Center in Cincinnati. Expletive-laced challenges were hurled back and forth. All the while, a national television audience watched as one of college basketball’s fiercest rivalries exploded into chaos.

    The reputations of the two teams involved appeared to be in tatters.

    Yet now, little more than three months after a Dec. 10 brawl that was, for better or worse, one of the signature moments of college basketball’s regular season, both Xavier and Cincinnati are among the 16 teams left in the N.C.A.A.tournament.

    And the wild brawl has become, if not forgotten, then certainly a secondary chapter to the teams’ seasons. The Bearcats, seeded sixth in the East, will play No. 2 Ohio State in Boston on Thursday night. The 10th-seeded Musketeers will play No. 3 Baylor in a South Region game in Atlanta on Friday.

    “We disciplined the guys that did wrong, we apologized, and then we told them how much we loved them, what we expected of them, and moved on,” Cincinnati Coach Mick Cronin said Wednesday. “We knew who we really are. We really focused on making sure we were having fun and not letting that define us.”

    The tension that exists between Cincinnati — the large public university — and Xavier — the smaller, more affluent Jesuit university a few miles away — mounted a few days before their annual matchup in December. Bearcats guard Sean Kilpatrick needled Xavier’s star guard Tu Holloway, saying that Holloway, the reigning Atlantic 10 player of the year, was not even good enough to start for Cincinnati, which plays in the Big East.

    The game was heated, with the teams exchanging words on the way to the locker room at halftime. But as Xavier pulled away to what would be a 76-53 victory, the trash talk became more intense. Holloway made a layup with 18 seconds left and yelled at the Cincinnati bench as he ran past on his way back up the court.

    As the final seconds ticked away, Holloway and the Cincinnati freshman guard Ge’Lawn Guyn went nose to nose. Guyn pushed Holloway in the face, and Xavier’s Dez Wells shoved Guyn to the floor in retaliation. Cincinnati center Yancy Gates then threw the ball at Holloway, causing a full-scale brawl to erupt. Gates then threw a punch at Xavier center Kenny Frease, who was looking elsewhere. The right cross opened up a nasty gash under Frease’s left eye. The Bearcats’ Cheikh Mbodj then kicked Frease after he fell to the floor following a hit by Gates. Frease managed to escape the melee and wander upcourt, bleeding profusely, before lying down and receiving treatment.

    The game was called with 9.4 seconds left, and the floor was cleared after several minutes.

    In the postgame news conference, Holloway, who had been up on the scorer’s table during the brawl, said that the Musketeers were “grown men over here,” adding: “We’ve got a whole bunch of gangsters in the locker room — not thugs, but tough guys on the court. And we went out there and zipped them up,” an apparent reference to putting the Bearcats in body bags.

    Cronin talked angrily after the game of physically removing the jerseys of his players, saying they needed to realize “how lucky they are to even be here, let alone have a scholarship.”

    “Mick Cronin did a remarkable job of dealing with that head-on in the postgame press conference and obviously in the locker room with his own team,” Dan Gavitt, the associate commissioner of basketball for the Big East, said. “There’s no preparation or script for an incident like that, and he stood up and said the right things and did the right things and in the long run his team benefitted from it.”

    Xavier Coach Chris Mack sent out a Twitter message after the game that said: “If my players say they’ve been taught to be tough their whole life, they mean ON THE FLOOR. Nothing else is condoned.”

    Gates, Mbodj, and the Cincinnati freshman Octavius Ellis were given six-game suspensions, with Guyn suspended for a game. Gates tearfully apologized the day after the brawl, and his private apology to Frease was reportedly a factor in his not facing criminal charges. Xavier suspended four players, three of them starters, including Holloway, who missed the next game, a loss to Oral Roberts.

    The Musketeers, who had been 8-0 after beating Cincinnati, lost the two games after that as well. They struggled during Atlantic 10 conference play, and went 13-12 after the brawl.

    “After that game our confidence was lost a little bit,” Holloway said last week, “and it took a couple of months to get it back.”

    It was in the conference tournament in Atlantic City that Xavier righted itself, making the title game, where it lost to St. Bonaventure.

    Holloway then showed that he could start for any team in the country, scoring 25 points in Xavier’s N.C.A.A. tournament opener against Notre Dame, including a high-arcing bank shot with 21.3 seconds to go that put Xavier ahead for good. He added 21 in the Musketeers’ victory over Lehigh last Sunday, to go with Frease’s 25 points and 12 rebounds.

    “The adversity we see in the N.C.A.A. tournament, we’ve been through a lot more than that,” Frease said before the Lehigh game.

    At the time of the brawl, Cincinnati was 5-3, but the fallout seemed to galvanize the team.

    The Bearcats won seven straight after the Xavier game, and went 12-6 in Big East play and made the conference tournament final, upsetting top-seeded Syracuse. Gates had a double-double in the opening tournament win over Texas, then played a rugged game against Florida State on Sunday night, battling larger players inside in a 62-56 win. And despite being a 60 percent free-throw shooter, Gates made three critical free throws in the final moments.

    Now Cincinnati finds itself in the Round of 16, just like its crosstown rival, Xavier. It is a long way from the ugliness of Dec. 10.

    “We’ve been on a mission to define what Cincinnati basketball is all about, what our university and city is all about, and the kids have banded together to do that,” Cronin said. “It hasn’t been easy.”

     

    Copyright. 2012. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved

  • Jenson Button Wins Australian Grand Prix

    arch 18, 2012
     

    Jenson Button Wins Australian Grand Prix

    By 

    MELBOURNE — The two strongest drivers from the Formula One championship last year kept it up in the first race of the 2012 season, finishing in the top two spots.

    But this time it was Jenson Button who led the charge from start to finish and won the Australian Grand Prix on Sunday, crossing the finish line 2.1 seconds ahead of Sebastian Vettel.

    That small difference spoke volumes about the coming season, practically ensuring that it would not be a repeat of the past two, in which Vettel and his Red Bull team dominated and took the series title. Now, McLaren Mercedes — which finished second in the series in the past two years — and its two world champion drivers are ready to challenge. Coming in third place on Sunday was Lewis Hamilton, Button’s teammate at McLaren, who had started the race in pole position.

    “Starting the year strong for this team is really important,” said Button, who finished last year second over all. “The last two years for us have been tricky, so coming away with Lewis’s pole and the victory today puts us in a great position, and starting on the right foot.”

    It was Button’s third victory in Melbourne, where he won in a Brawn car in 2009 — a victory he said Sunday had been “too easy” — and then in his first race at McLaren in 2010. It was the 13th victory of his career.

    Mark Webber, Vettel’s teammate, came in fourth, which was the Australian’s best finish at his home Grand Prix, where he had scored no higher than fifth, having made his first attempt in 2002.

    “Today was a strong showing for us and it was a good day for Red Bull Racing, given what we went to bed with last night,” said Webber, referring to the team’s poor qualifying results.

    Still, the race Sunday was far from a repeat of the previous season, even though all the main players finished so closely entwined.

    The McLarens started from first and second on the grid for the first time since 2009, and Hamilton — who had a difficult season last year, with problems in his private life affecting his racing — drove an error-free race to a third-place finish.

    The key? Button simply beat Hamilton into the first corner and never let go.

    “A bit of a tough day,” Hamilton said, “but I will just have to keep my head up.”

    A lucky intervention of the safety car after 34 laps allowed Vettel to slip in between the two McLarens, which had been first and second since the start.

    “I think, over all, he was too quick today for the whole race,” Vettel said of Button. “So to come away second with a lot of points is very important. The car has a lot of potential.”

    Button said the safety car had prompted his biggest worry in the 58-lap race.

    “When you have a 10-second gap, it is a great place to be and you can control it,” he said. “But when the safety car comes out and it is 6 in the evening, it is hard to keep temperature in the tires.”

    In a surprise, Romain Grosjean started the race third in the grid. The Frenchman, driving a Lotus, is making a return to Formula One after a brief stint in 2009. He had supremely out-qualified his world champion teammate, Kimi Raikkonen, who started only 17th.

    But Grosjean had a bad start and immediately dropped down the pack before crashing out after only two laps, after his car and the Williams car of Pastor Maldonado hit when the Venezuelan tried to pass him.

    The first race of the season had a record six world-champion drivers, and the top three finishers were all world champions. Fernando Alonso, another of the champions, finished fifth in his Ferrari after starting 12th, while Raikkonen, the 2007 world champion who returned to Formula One this season after a two-year break, finished seventh.

    Schumacher, the seven-time world champion, started fourth in his Mercedes, looking as if he would put two difficult years behind him, after failing to make it to the podium since his return from retirement in 2010. But he dropped out of the race with a gearbox problem after only 10 laps.

    The tension went right down to the last lap, as Jean-Éric Vergne, a rookie driver at the Toro Rosso team, was involved in a battle with his teammate, Daniel Ricciardo, for the final available points.

    Heading into the final lap, Vergne was 11th, behind Raikkonen, and Ricciardo was 12th. Suddenly, Maldonado, who was in sixth position, crashed into a wall while Nico Rosberg, in eighth in the other Mercedes, suffered a flat tire after coming into contact with the Sauber of Sergio Perez.

    Both Maldonado and Rosberg dropped out, offering more points to the Toro Rosso drivers. Ricciardo passed Vergne, while Paul Di Resta, the rookie of the year last year, passed Vergne down the straight and took the final point for Force India. Ricciardo finished ninth, taking two points in his first home race, and the last available point went to Di Resta.

    “I don’t really know how that happened on the last lap,” Ricciardo said. “I was a bit lucky to be the last one in that group because I could have a clear picture of the other cars going off in front.”

    Up and down the pack, in fact, the results of the race were more than usual about driver skill than simply the speed of the car.

     

    COPYRIGHT. 2012. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved

  • F1: McLaren hails Australian GP: “We can do great things with this car”

    F1: McLaren hails Australian GP: “We can do great things with this car”

    McLaren press release

     
    F1: McLaren hails Australian GP: “We can do great things with this car”
     

    Jenson Button 

    “Every victory means a lot – but today shows just how important it was to have a strong winter. The starts of the past two seasons have both been tricky for us, so today is really encouraging. The guys at the circuit and all the men and women back in Woking have done an amazing job to get us here.

    “Today means a lot to me, and I’m sure it’ll mean a lot to all of them too: it’ll make those extra hours worked in the early hours of the morning all the more worthwhile, because we know we can do great things with this car.

    Jenson Button, McLaren Mercedes
    Jenson Button, McLaren Mercedes

    Photo by: xpb.cc

     

    “At the start, I really wanted to get away fast in the first two laps to avoid the threat of DRS – it wasn’t easy because I had Lewis right on my tail. But the race went smoothly after that. My biggest worry was the late-race Safety Car: I had a 10-second advantage, which was pretty healthy, but the Safety Car cut that to nothing.

    “And, since it was 6.00pm, with the sun going down, it was quite difficult to keep temperature in the tyres when we were running slowly behind the Safety Car. That was a big worry for me, but it worked out okay in the end: I got clear of Seb [Vettel] and the DRS zone pretty quickly and was able to pull out an advantage and hold it to the end.

    “There’s a huge amount of positives to take away from this weekend: we’ve got a great car and we can fight for the world championships. This is a perfect start to my season and I’m already looking forward to Malaysia.”

    Lewis Hamilton 

    “Congratulations to Jenson and the whole team for such a great result today.

    “While it’s a bit disappointing not to have been able to convert pole position into victory, I’m not downhearted – there are still plenty of races ahead and lots more opportunities to score points.

    Lewis Hamilton, McLaren Mercedes
    Lewis Hamilton, McLaren Mercedes

    Photo by: xpb.cc

     

    “I struggled out there a little – it wasn’t my day. But what’s most important is that we showed today that we have a very quick racing car – that’s a massive positive for the team.

    “I’m not sure what happened at the start, but I lost ground and then suffered from tyre degradation at the end of the first stint. Then, at the end of the race, I wasn’t able to close the gap to Seb – he was very quick on the straights which meant that it was always going to be difficult to pass him – so I dropped back into some clear air, then Mark [Webber] put me under pressure.

    “I’ll just re-focus now, get my head down and look to the next race. The world championships are all about consistency, so that’s what I’ll be aiming for.”

    Martin Whitmarsh, Team principal, Vodafone McLaren Mercedes 

    “Jenson was utterly immaculate today.

    “He made a brilliant start, slipping past Lewis who got bogged down momentarily, and after that he controlled the race with consummate authority.

    All that hard work paid off

    Martin Whitmarsh

     

    “Lewis, too, drove extremely well, but was unfortunately deprived of second place when the Safety Car was deployed late in the race. A Vodafone McLaren Mercedes one-two had been there for the taking; but I guess it’s a very good sign when you feel a little disappointed by a one-three, so we’ll settle for that!

    “We never under-estimate our opposition, and undoubtedly there’s a long hard road ahead of us between now and the end of the season. But we’ve started well, and in a few days’ time we’ll roll into Sepang, Malaysia, hungry to score a repeat victory.

    “I want to thank everyone at not only Vodafone McLaren Mercedes, but also at Mercedes AMG HighPerformancePowertrains, for a fantastic effort over the past few weeks and months. We’ve all worked incredibly hard – and, today, in dappled late-afternoon sunshine in Melbourne’s Albert Park, all that hard work paid off.”

    JENSON BUTTON – MP4-27A-02 

    Started: 2nd
    Finished: 1st
    Fastest lap: 1m29.187s (1st)
    Pitstops: two: laps 16 and 36 (Op-Pr-Pr)
    2011 points: 25 (1st)

    LEWIS HAMILTON – MP4-27A-03 

    Started: 1st
    Finished: 3rd
    Fastest lap: 1m29.538s (+0.351s, 4th)
    Pitstops: two: laps 17 and 36 (Op-Pr-Pr)
    Points: 15 (3rd)

    McLaren Facts: 

    176th victory for McLaren
    149th fastest lap for McLaren
    72nd victory for McLaren, Mercedes and Mobil 1
    28th victory for Vodafone McLaren Mercedes
    13th victory for Jenson Button
    7th fastest lap for Jenson Button

    (0 votes)
    1 hour ago