Month: June 2011

  • From Harvard to Algeria. The LSD Experiences of Dr. Timothy Leary

    How Was Your Trip, Allen?

    Acid commentaries from Timothy Leary’s just-revealed archive.

     

    Timothy Leary has settled in at the New York Public Library. After many months of negotiation, the NYPL has acquired his complete papers—335 boxes of manuscripts, letters, photographs, and videos constituting the legacy of the psychedelic guru (and compulsive record-keeper). It was almost exactly 50 years ago that Leary, working at Harvard with then-legal drugs (psilocybin, mescaline, lysergic acid diethylamide), near-single-­handedly summoned forth the sixties, as he and other psychologists began testing the effects of hallucinogens on students, artists, poets, and eventually prisoners—not to mention themselves. You could call 1961 the first summer of love; it was certainly the best documented. Subjects who submitted detailed “trip reports” on a variety of psychedelic substances included Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, and the poet Charles Olson. Based on extensive access to the library’s new materials, which won’t be catalogued and opened to scholars for years, we’ve pieced together an appropriately meandering oral history of the ultimate Leary-orchestrated drug trip.

     

     

     

     

    Charles Olson, Poet: “About twenty minutes after taking [mushrooms], I felt slightly nauseated and began to notice visual effects … Feeling sick, I moved to a nearby couch and lay down. At this time I noticed the floor under my feet was alive with patterns of color … I felt tricked!”

     

     

    Robert Perlongo, Poet and Critic: “Cold felt colder than usual, warm felt warmer. Vivid colors seemed suddenly of burning intensity.”

     

     

    Allen Ginsberg, Poet: “After an hour … I withdrew into visual introspection … I lay down on a large comfortable couch next to my companion Peter Orlovsky and drifted off into a reverie about the origin of the universe which involved the visualization of a sort of octipus [sic] of darkness breaking through out of the primal void … [I] envisaged various people I knew … as Seraphs or Fiendish Angels with fangs of Judgement rushing thru the void over Atlantic Blakean Spaces to make meet with each other to take Conference over the future of Life.”

     

     

    Jack Kerouac, Novelist: “I saw you, Leary, as a Jesuit Father … I saw Allen [Ginsberg] as Sariputra (the Indian saint). My old idea of St. Peter (about Peter Orlov­sky) was strengthened … Pearl became a Lotus of indescribably [sic] beauty sitting there in the form of a Buddha woman Bhikkushini … Mainly I felt like a floating Khan on a magic carpet with my interesting lieutenants and gods.”

     

     

    Ralph Metzner, Research Assistant: “Outside the window the branches of the tree were gigantic arms with transparent muscles, now threatening, now embracing. The bookcase was full of swimming books, the door bulged like a balloon, the carpet in the other room was full of ­thousands of little green snakes. The dial on the telephone was a huge pearl-studded wheel … I felt like yelling and shouting: ‘Look, see how beautiful, how amazing.’ ”

     

     

    Gunther Weil, Research Assistant: “The sand was pure gold and eddied to a multitude of whirls and baroque bullshit. It was my head on the ground. John the Baptist on some fantastic golden plate. There were no eyes in the sockets. Just the vacant black, tortured holes. Suddenly a hand slithered out of the sand behind the head and grabbed my head by the eye sockets pulled it into the sand.”

     

     

    Bill Mcglothlin, Psychologist: “I … said ‘I remember now why I stopped taking these drugs—they make me so terribly sad’ … I had paid for the full picture but I didn’t want to see the rest.”

     

     

    Huston Smith, Religion Scholar: “I said to Tim … ‘[I]t looks to me like you are taking an awful chance in these experiments. Objective tests might reveal my heart and body in general to have been functioning normally through this afternoon, but there is such a thing as people being frightened to death.’ ”

     

     

    Olson: “I had no sex organ. I could not find it.”

     

     

    Kerouac: “On mushrooms I felt quite strong, quite angry in fact at the atheists for fighting Christianity.”

     

     

    Metzner: “Deep philosophical questions arose and dissipated in a stream of verbal and logical sophistry punctuated by convulsive giggles. Gunther [Weil] asked: ‘Can I have a pain in your leg?’ and I answered: ‘Not today, but tomorrow maybe.’ ”

     

     

    Weil: “I fantasied [sic] Ralph [Metzner]’s dying and a mixture of guilt and sorrow prompted me into uttering a ludicrous proposal of relief. ‘How about a glass of milk?’ ”

     

     

    Olson: “Elliott and Tricia began ‘Testing’ me … I thought at one point that they were ‘petting’ and I said ‘Cut it out.’ Elliott replied, ‘Get up and do something about it. Get up!’ But I couldn’t and again felt apathetic.”

     

     

    Weil: “[Metzner] called the ugly green flowers sick and dying. I called them flesh-eating plants. He screamed that I should not say that … I then went into the bathroom and took a glorious shit. That shit was the first pleasurable experience of the day.”

     

     

    Mcglothlin: “In all my LSD sessions I would at some point start to go further with the drug only to be brought back by the feeling of needing to urinate.”

     

     

    Kerouac: “When I went to pee I said to the toilet ‘It’s all your fault!’ and could never leave the group without feeling that they were still with me (in the toilet) … Finally I said ‘I think I’ll take a shit out the window’ in desperation, it was impossible to go on in such ecstasy and excitement.”

     

     

    Ginsberg: “Kerouac in his chair developed a very funny comedy of his own … his final statement being ‘I think I’ll take a shit out of the window’ which struck me deeply as being a final transcendental put-down of the whole appearance of things … Without moving from his chair he did it. [Leary’s note—“I don’t think he did!”]”

     

     

    Metzner: “I pulled myself up and kissed [Lisa] and she turned away. I said: ‘That’s right, you’re married, aren’t you’ … Smells of incense and sex were in my nostrils … I felt like a whirling dervish, a possessed dancer, like the insides of a pneumatic drill or the semen about to be discharged in an orgastic penis.”

     

     

    Weil: “The bastard [Metzner] was in the middle of a fantastic hard-on vision in which his prick was growing out of his navel and took on the dimensions of a skyscraper. He looked absolutely deliriously happy and I suddenly became extremely jealous … Karin came in once and kissed me.”

     

     

    Metzner: “Karin said she would be back, but I said, ‘No, no, don’t leave’ … She went through the door and her leaving became the summary and climax of all abandonments and losses and I felt I was going to die.”

     

     

    Olson: “Later I thought it was required to go into the bedroom and have sex with Tricia although I knew somehow I could not. I had a great deal of trouble getting my pants off and finally ripped them. Tricia kept saying, ‘You have to do something! Do something!’ … I later found myself in the living room with only my underpants on … I found a wet spot in the center of the bed.”

     

     

    Ginsberg: “I got up out of bed and walked downstairs naked … pronounced my nakedness as the first act of revolution against the destroyers of the human image … and grabbed the telephone to communicate my decision—wanted to hook up [Khrushchev], Kerouac, Burroughs, Ike, Kennedy, Mao … Mailer in Bellevue, etc.—all on one telephone line and get them all to come immediately to Harvard to have spectral conference over the Future of the universe … Got as far as telling the phone operator I was GOD and wanted to talk with Kerouac … reached him and had a [very] expressive conversation.”

     

     

    Perlongo:“This general quickening of reality led, particularly in the middle hours (the third and fourth hours after taking), to moments of deep self-realization … The question of What Is Life? Seemed to become a burning issue … I became sad because there was so much I did not know, so much I could not account for.”

     

     

    Smith:“In this condition you discover who you are at base. In my case, family man, teacher, etc. At one point I felt certain I had come upon an important theoretical point regarding personality and its structure … Now I can’t recollect what it was.”

  • Madoff Says Judge Made Him a ‘Human Piñata’

    Louis Lanzano/Associated Press

    Bernard L. Madoff in March 2009. He said Judge Denny Chin was “anything but fair.”

     

     

    June 28, 2011
     

    Madoff Says Judge Made Him a ‘Human Piñata’

    Having served two years of his 150-year sentence, Bernard L. Madoff remains upset that Judge Denny Chin did not give him a shorter term, which might have allowed him the chance someday to regain his freedom, even as a very old man.

    “Maybe the judge felt, ‘Well, he’s 70 years old, so even if I give him 20 years, he’s going to be 90 years old,’ ” Mr. Madoff said by phone from the federal prison in Butner, N.C.

    “But quite frankly, there’s a big difference with dying in prison, you know, and dying outside with your family.”

    Judge Chin has said in recent interviews that he considered a sentence that might have allowed Mr. Madoff to be freed when he is in his 90s. But he concluded that Mr. Madoff simply did not deserve it, and in court called his conduct “extraordinarily evil.”

    Mr. Madoff, in a recent series of interviews and e-mails, took issue with the judge’s description. To characterize him as “this monster and this evil person,” he said, “I just think that was totally unrealistic and unfair.”

    “In my mind, Chin was anything but fair, with zero understanding of the industry,” Mr. Madoff added.

    He said the judge had made him “the human piñata of Wall Street,” while financial firms and government officials “walk away free.”

    “Remember,” he said, “they caused the recession, not me.”

    Mr. Madoff also criticized his prosecutors. (Neither they nor the judge would comment on his remarks.)

    At Butner, where he is housed in a medium-security prison, he said that in making his criticisms, he was not trying to justify his conduct. “My comments should not be taken as an excuse for the pain and suffering I have caused,” he wrote. In another message, he said he felt “completely responsible and have remorse and shame for what I have done.”

    Mr. Madoff, who did not appeal his sentence, said he worked most days in the commissary and spent recreational time walking on a track and reading books, from junk novels to biographies. He made it clear that he had not been much of a reader previously. “Now, I literally read two books a week,” he said. “I’m reading all the James Michener books.”

    He said he had pleaded guilty to spare his family the trauma and expense of a trial. Did he expect a long sentence? Yes, he said. “But, did I think it was going to be 150 years? No.”

    Mr. Madoff, now 73, said the thought of dying in prison remained very difficult for him. Yet, he added, “if it wasn’t for the fact that I am constantly anguished about the pain I have caused my family and others, I could deal with prison life here at Butner.”

    Copyright 2011. The New York Times Company All Rights Reserved
     

  • Fernando Alonso concedes defeat in Formula 1 title race

     

    Page last updated at 10:57 GMT, Monday, 27 June 2011 11:57 UK

    Sebastian Vettel

    European Grand Prix in 90 seconds (UK users only)

    Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso has admitted defeat in the battle for this year’s title after Sebastian Vettel’s sixth win of the season in Valencia.

    Red Bull’s Vettel extended his lead in the title race to 77 points after eight rounds, leading from start to finish.

    And despite there being 11 races left in the season, Alonso added: “The [title] is not in our calculations.

    “If anyone thinks we can win being eight-tenths of a second behind [Red Bull] they don’t understand Formula 1.”

    Vettel and Red Bull have been completely dominant throughout the season.

    The 23-year-old has secured pole position in seven of the eight races so far, going on to win six of them, and is the first man to finish first or second in the first eight races of an F1 season.

    ANDREW BENSON’S BLOG


    If Vettel is going to show a vulnerability, it is when he is under pressure, needs to make up or defend place – as Jenson Button proved in the Canadian Grand Prix

    Read more analysis

    In total, Vettel has dropped only 14 points all season, and his pace compared to his rivals in the last two races has been even more impressive given that the Canadian and European Grands Prix are not circuits ideally suited to the Red Bull’s strengths – in particular on high-speed corners.

    But the reigning champion refused to dwell on his championship lead after winning the European Grand Prix.

    “If you look at F1 compared to other sports it’s a very long season,” he said. “You will have some races where it will work and races when you will struggle and it will be difficult.

    “I think you need to look at last year as an example. It shows that we [Red Bull] had good races up to a certain point and then things went wrong.

    “Of course, our target is to be in the lead and make sure we stay there but the most important race to lead the championship is after the last one.”


    I think second place is the maximum we can have in these days, so to be here between the Red Bull cars is a great achievement

    Fernando AlonsoFerrari driver

    However, with the gap to McLaren driver Jenson Button and Red Bull team-mate Mark Webber now 77 points – McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton is 89 points adrift and Ferrari’s Alonso 99 points off the pace – Vettel’s rivals all believe the race is only on for second.

    After the race, Hamilton also conceded that the title may be out of reach, before changing his mind and retracting his comments on Monday via Twitter.

    “It’s finished really. In the sense of the title it’s almost over,” said Hamilton on Sunday.

    But 24 hours later he said: “To all our supporters, ignore what you read in the papers today. My team will never give up and I will never give up.”

    Despite this, Hamilton along with McLaren team-mate Button said the team needed to improve the car quickly as the gap between them and Red Bull could be more pronounced in the next race at Silverstone.

    “We’ve taken a step back this weekend – or maybe the others have gone forward,” said Hamilton. “I think we’re quite a bit down in downforce.

    “We haven’t made an upgrade on that for several weeks, especially rear downforce, and I think that in the next race we may really struggle again.

    “I’m really not looking forward to Silverstone. Ferrari are a lot faster than us and the Red Bulls are on another planet.”

    Button added: “We need some really good upgrades.

    “We need to get our heads down and come up with something – particularly aerodynamically, I think. We need to take some risks.

    “There’s a big gap behind us to the Mercedes and a big gap in front of us in terms of Ferrari and Red Bull.”

    Alonso, meanwhile, reiterated his pre-race belief that his focus is solely on beating the chasing pack to second behind Vettel.

    “I think second place is the maximum we can have in these days, so to be here between the Red Bull cars is a great achievement today,” said the Spaniard.

    “Our aim is to fight with the McLarens.”

     

      Copyright. 2011 BBC Sport.com.  All Rights Reserved

  • Google Introduces Facebook Competitor, Emphasizing Privacy

    Google+ emphasizes sharing with specific groups of people.

     

     

    Google+ users can drag and drop Gmail contacts into different groups, or circles.

     

     

    June 28, 2011
     

    Google Introduces Facebook Competitor, Emphasizing Privacy

    Google took its biggest leap yet onto Facebook’s turf on Tuesday, introducing a social networking service called the Google+ project — which happens to look very much like Facebook.

    The service, which will initially be available only to a select group of Google users who will soon be able to invite others, will let people share and discuss status updates, photos and links.

    But the Google+ project will be different from Facebook in one significant way, which Google hopes will be enough to convince people to use yet another social networking service. It is designed for sharing with groups — like colleagues, college roommates or hiking friends — instead of with all of a user’s friends or the entire Web. It also offers group text messaging and video chat.

    “In real life, we have walls and windows and I can speak to you knowing who’s in the room, but in the online world, you get to a ‘Share’ box and you share with the whole world,” said Bradley Horowitz, a vice president of product management at Google who is leading the company’s social efforts with Vic Gundotra, a senior vice president of engineering.

    The debut of Google+ will test whether Google can overcome its past flops in social networking, like Buzz and Orkut, and deal with one of the most pressing challenges facing the company.

    At stake is Google’s status as the most popular entry point to the Web. When people post on Facebook, which is mostly off-limits to search engines, Google loses valuable information that could benefit its Web search, advertising and other products.

    Google+ may already be too late.

    In May, 180 million people visited Google sites, including YouTube, versus 157.2 million on Facebook, according to comScore. But Facebook users looked at 103 billion pages and spent an average of 375 minutes on the site, while Google users viewed 46.3 billion pages and spent 231 minutes.

    Advertisers pay close attention to those numbers, and to the fact that people increasingly turn to Facebook and other social sites like Twitter to ask questions they used to ask Google, like a recommendation for a restaurant or doctor, because they want more personalized answers.

    “Can someone eclipse Facebook in terms of its hold? It is a fantastic broadcast mechanism,” said Charlene Li, a social media analyst and founder of Altimeter Group, a technology research firm. “But if Google becomes the owner of your private groups, it’s going to be a splintering of our social lives.”

    Mr. Gundotra and Mr. Horowitz said that knowing more about individual Google users will improve all Google products, including ads, search, YouTube and maps, because Google will learn what people like and eventually be able to personalize those products.

    “To think we could achieve Google’s stated mission of organizing the world’s information absent people would be ludicrous,” Mr. Horowitz said.

    But Google has been criticized for failing to understand the importance of social information on the Web until competitors like Facebook and Twitter had already leapt ahead. Part of the blame, analysts say, falls on Google’s engineering-heavy culture, which values quantitative data and algorithms over more nuanced, touchy-feely pursuits like socializing.

    Exhibit A is Buzz, a social sharing tool for Gmail users. It automatically included users’ e-mail contacts in their Buzz network, setting off widespread criticism that Google invaded users’ privacy and failed to understand that people’s e-mail contacts are not necessarily their friends.

    Google quickly changed the service so it did not automatically connect friends. In March, Google settled with the Federal Trade Commission over charges of deceptive privacy practices related to Buzz and agreed to 20 years of audits.

    Mr. Gundotra and Mr. Horowitz, both of whom worked on Buzz, say they were chastened by the experience. They said Google+ grew out of those mistakes, because they realized how much people care about controlling the information they share.

    And unlike its approach with Buzz, which was tested only by Google employees before its broad introduction to the public, Google is calling Google+ a project to emphasize that it is not a final product, saying it will undergo many changes to fix problems and introduce new features. Still, its new Web site, plus.google.com, is Google’s most fully formed social networking tool yet.

    Mr. Gundotra and Mr. Horowitz said they took pains to mimic people’s relationships in real life and eliminate the social awkwardness that things like friend requests and oversharing can generate on other sites.

    Google+ users will start by selecting people they know from their Gmail contacts (and from other services, once Google strikes deals with them). They can drag and drop friends’ names into different groups, or circles, and give the circles titles, like “sisters” or “book club.” Then they can share with these groups or with all of their friends.

    Unlike on Facebook, people do not have to agree to be friends with one another. They can receive someone’s updates without sharing their own. Users can also view their Google+ page the way their friends see it, to ensure their bosses do not see pictures from Saturday night, for instance.

    Google+ users will see a toolbar on top of any Google site they use, where they can click to share something or see updates from friends. Eventually, the toolbar could appear on other Web sites. Google+ will also improve the usefulness of other Google products that have not gained traction, like Latitude for sharing your location and +1 for giving a thumbs-up to a particular site in search results, the executives said.

    When users visit their Google+ homepage, they see three columns and a stream of status updates in the middle that looks remarkably like Facebook. But Google said that besides an easier way to share with select groups, Google+ has several other features that distinguish it from competitors.

    It offers group video chats, called Hangouts, that other members of a group can join as it is happening. Users can search a section called Sparks to see articles and videos from across the Web on certain topics, like recipes or Alzheimer’s disease, and share them with relevant groups of friends.

    And on the Google+ mobile app for Android phones and iPhones, people can chat with groups using a feature called Huddle. Photos and videos shot with cellphones are automatically uploaded to a private album, so Google+ users can quickly view and post them from their phones or later on a computer.

    With these services, Google will compete with a host of start-ups, like Path for sharing with small groups, SocialEyes for video chat, Flipboard for articles on certain topics and GroupMe for group texting.

    “The notion that online sharing is broken is not an insight that is unique to us,” Mr. Horowitz said. “We have a way to bring in millions of users in a way that is challenging for a start-up.”

     

    Copyright. 2011. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved

     

     

  • Vettel secures yet another pole position ahead of European GP

     

     

    Sebastian Vettel, <br />Red Bull” width=”275″ height=”183″ align=”right” border=”1″ hspace=”10″ />Sebastian Vettel’s 2011 <br />qualifying tally now stands at seven poles from eight grands prix, as the world champion took his 22nd Formula 1 career pole in Valencia.</p>
<p>The German leads an all-Red Bull front row ahead of team-mate Mark Webber, who was only fifth after the first Q3 runs, but was the only man to improve at the second attempt and duly jumped to second.</p>
<p>Lewis Hamilton completes the top three in the best McLaren, <br />ahead of the Ferraris of Fernando Alonso and Felipe Massa. Montreal winner Jenson Button (McLaren) will start sixth.</p>
<p>The Mercedes chose to only make one Q3 run and filled row four, <br />with Nico Rosberg a scant 0.009 seconds ahead of team-mate Michael Schumacher.</p>
<p>Fifth row men Nick Heidfeld (Renault) and Adrian Sutil (Force India)<br /> both made the Q3 cut but did not set times – Sutil sitting the session out, and Heidfeld going out briefly at the end before aborting his run.</p>
<p>Sutil’s last-minute progress into Q3 came at the expense of Renault’s <br />Vitaly Petrov – which was the only real upset of the first two thirds of qualifying.</p>
<p>Paul di Resta joined the <br />Russian on row six in the second Force India, ahead of Rubens Barrichello (Williams) and Kamui Kobayashi (Sauber).</p>
<p>The second Williams of Pastor Maldonado caused a brief red flag in <br />Q2 when it ground to a halt in the middle of the track. But he had already done a time good enough<br /> to secure 15th on the grid ahead of Sauber’s Sergio Perez and Toro Rosso’s Sebastien Buemi.</p>
<p>After some fleeting scares for Webber, Kobayashi and Massa (who got himself out of <br />danger by sticking on soft tyres and blasting to the Q1 top spot by a huge margin), <br />it was Toro Rosso’s Jaime Alguersuari who was again the upper midfield driver exiting in Q1.<br /> He ended up 18th ahead of the Lotus duo – Heikki Kovalainen in front of Jarno Trulli, who spun on his final Q1 run.</p>
<p>Everyone comfortably made the 107 per cent qualifying cut, with Tonio Liuzzi’s Hispania splitting the Virgins as he edged <br />ahead of Jerome D’Ambrosio.</p>
							</div><!-- .entry-content -->
					</div>
		<div class=

  • Martin Brundle on the Canadian Grand Prix 2011

    16:13 GMT, Monday, 13 June 2011 17:13 UK

    BBC F1 commentator

    Jenson Button celebrates winning the Canadian Grand Prix

    Highlights – Canadian Grand Prix

    Lewis Hamilton has been getting a fair bit of stick following a Canadian Grand Prix from which he retired after three racing laps, during which he was involved in two separate collisions.

    Hamilton has got the bad-boy reputation, and a slight attitude to go with it. Even if he smoothes
    it over with some carefully chosen words afterwards, it is not doing him any good.

    It’s like the hard-tackling footballer –
    he’s perceived as likely to be guilty before he does anything.

    Hamilton’s contact with Mark Webber
    on the first lap was unnecessary, and that is what put him behind Jenson Button and led to the two McLaren team-mates coming together.

    Hamilton is always impressively trying to make places, but while it is all very well being the most aggressive overtaker, it’s not generating any rewards for him right now.


    In his collision with Button,
    I feel Hamilton is a bit of a wronged man – the incident is 50-50 blame in my view

    Martin Brundle

    He’s collecting car damage when he needs to be finishing races. He has to come at his racing in a different way – it’s not working.

    These incidents are happening when he’s trying to pass people he is much faster than at given points in a race. So the key question is, why is he behind them in the first place?

    Maybe that is what Hamilton has to work on.
    There seems to be much more potential than he’s delivering and he’s then having to compensate with over-aggressive moves in the race.

    In his collision with Button, though, I feel Hamilton is a bit of a wronged man.

    I don’t agree that it was more Hamilton’s fault than Button’s. Jenson clearly knew Lewis was there after he was slow exiting the final chicane – his head tilts twice as he is watching Lewis hard in his mirrors. The incident is 50-50 blame in my view at best. Jenson said post-race that he had apologised to Lewis.

    Button was partly at fault in his incident with Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso.

    <br“Lewis Hamilton looks at his McLaren after colliding with Jenson Button” />

    Hamilton and Button collide in Canada

    If you compare the collision between
    Button and Alonso with that between Paul di Resta and Nick Heidfeld, I’m not sure Button was any
    less to blame than Di Resta was – and the Scot got a penalty, even though he had a damaged front
    wing and therefore had already paid the price for the contact.

    Alonso was ahead,
    Button was no more than halfway alongside and the Spaniard was entitled to turn in.
    He gave Button space, and the McLaren under-steered on the slippery kerbs into the Ferrari.

    There were so many inquiries after that race that thankfully Jenson’s spectacular victory was not taken away with penalties. This would have been very cruel on the fans who loyally stayed with the longest F1 race in history,
    although the stewards must be consistent.

    Despite those two incidents, 
    there is no doubting the quality of Button’s drive
    . It was a thoroughly deserved win,
    surely his greatest victory yet.

    Button said in the news conference that he thought he had pitted eight or nine times. It made me smile that the race was so complex and manic the winner thought he had pitted 50% more than he had.

    It was the latest of several wins Button has taken in mixed conditions – starting with his maiden win for Honda in Hungary in 2006, through Malaysia 2009 with Brawn and his two victories for McLaren last year in Australia and China.

    Button is very smooth, precise, and consistent with the car. That style comes into its own in those circumstances, allied to sheer confidence. He seems to attack more in those conditions than in the dry sometimes.

    His pace in the closing stages forced Sebastian Vettel into a mistake on the last lap. I presume Vettel was worried about the DRS zone at the end of the last lap and he just got in too deep into the Turn Six/Seven chicane, although he did well not to spin his Red Bull completely and lose second place.

    It’s nice to see Vettel is human and can make mistakes – but he still finished second. And to be fair to him,
    he handled four safety car re-starts superbly and drove impeccably from pole until that final lap.

    He was beaten, but – just like in China – only just. And Hamilton and Alonso did not score any
    points so it was actually quite a good day for Vettel.

    He is annoyed with himself for doing that,
    and I have no doubt he will turn up in Valencia at the next race ever more determined.

    Jenson Button

    ‘Special weekend’ – Button

    Wet-dry races are always good, and this one was no different,
    despite the painful two-hour red flag period.

    My one regret is that
    Hamilton and Alonso were not in that mix as well.
    It was very exciting as it was – add those two in alongside Button, Vettel, Webber and Michael Schumacher and it would have been truly epic.

    I know there are a lot of fans, particularly Michael Schumacher fans, who are saying it’s fake racing, that their man was robbed of a podium because of people passing using the DRS overtaking aid.

    There has always been a lot of overtaking in Canada and, on the face of it, it is the last track you would think needed two DRS zones.

    But everything may not be what it seems. First of all, everyone has the same opportunity of having DRS available although the front of any pack is always exposed. But – just like in Turkey – the overtakes may or may not have been caused solely by the DRS.

    There are differing wing levels and gear ratios to take into account, KERS, corner-exit speeds, and tyre wear which is higher on the Mercedes than some other cars. The Mercedes is not the fastest car either. All of those factors could have had an additional
    influence on the ease with which Schumacher was passed by Button and Webber.

    It was by far the most convincing demonstration that Schumacher can still cut it since he returned at the beginning of
    last season after three years in retirement.

    He wasn’t clumsy in traffic, he made good moves on a day when others made mistakes,
    and he was very fair when he was being overtaken. If you erase your memory of the last year-and-a-half,
    it looked like vintage Michael Schumacher.


    I think F1 should push the boundaries out a bit more
    - the safety car should be a last resort, not a default option

    Martin Brundle

    There was, of course, a controversy about the use of the safety car.
    There were two main issues – should the race have started under the safety car, and did it stay out too long at the re-start after the red flag period?

    Most clear-cut is the re-start – the fact that the drivers came in almost immediately for intermediate tyres tells me that, on the face of it, the safety car was out too long, although it may emerge that there were good reasons for that to be the case.

    As for the start under the safety car,
    you have to walk a mile in race director Charlie Whiting’s shoes.

    He has drivers saying
    they can’t see where they’re going, it’s too dangerous, the track’s waterlogged. If he starts the race in those circumstances and somebody gets hurt or killed, he has got a problem.

    In this case, though,
    I think the key thing that led to the decision was that nobody knew how the Pirelli tyres were going to perform.

    There had been hardly any running on them this year, none at all in Canada, and it is a high-speed track with walls everywhere.

    Nevertheless, I think F1 should push the boundaries out a bit more, the safety car should be less in-vision and the drivers should drive to the conditions. The safety car should be a last resort, not a default option.

     

     

    Copyright.2011. BBC.co.uk. All Rights Reserved

  • Clarence Clemons, Springsteen’s Soulful Sideman, Dies at 69

     
    Scott Audette/Reuters

    Clarence Clemons performed with the E Street Band during the Super Bowl halftime show in Tampa in February 2009

     

    June 18, 2011
     

    Clarence Clemons, Springsteen’s Soulful Sideman, Dies at 69

    Clarence Clemons, the saxophonist in Bruce Springsteen’s E Street Band, whose jovial onstage manner, soul-rooted style and brotherly relationship with Mr. Springsteen made him one of rock’s most beloved sidemen, died Saturday at a hospital in Palm Beach, Fla. He was 69.

    The cause was complications from a stroke, which he suffered last Sunday, said a spokeswoman for Mr. Springsteen.

    From the beginnings of the E Street Band in 1972, Mr. Clemons played a central part in Mr. Springsteen’s music, complementing the group’s electric guitar and driving rhythms in songs like “Born to Run” and “Tenth Avenue Freeze-Out” with muscular, melodic saxophone hooks that echoed doo-wop, soul and early rock ’n’ roll.

    But equally important to the group’s image was the sense of affection and unbreakable camaraderie between Mr. Springsteen and his sax man. Few E Street Band shows were complete without a shaggy-dog story about the stormy night the two men met at a bar in Asbury Park, N.J., or a long bear hug between them at the end of the night.

    Mr. Clemons also became something of a celebrity in his own right, acting in Martin Scorsese’s “New York, New York” and other films, and on television shows like “Diff’rent Strokes,” and jamming with President Bill Clinton at the 1993 inaugural ball.

    A former college football player, Mr. Clemons towered over Mr. Springsteen at 6 feet 4 inches and about 250 pounds — his self-evident nickname was the Big Man — and for most of its history, he stood out as the sole black man in a white, working-class New Jersey rock band. (The keyboardist David Sancious, who is also black, played with the group until 1974.) Onstage he had almost as much magnetism as Mr. Springsteen, and even if much of his time was spent hitting a cowbell or singing backup, he could still stir up a stadium crowd with a few cheerful notes on his horn.

    For many fans, the bond between Mr. Springsteen and Mr. Clemons was symbolized by the photograph wrapped around the front and back covers of the 1975 album “Born to Run.” In that picture, a spent yet elated Mr. Springsteen leans on a shoulder to his right for support; the flip side revealed that it belonged to Mr. Clemons.

    “When you look at just the cover of ‘Born to Run,’ you see a charming photo, a good album cover, but when you open it up and see Clarence and me together, the album begins to work its magic,” Mr. Springsteen wrote in a foreword to “Big Man: Real Life and Tall Tales,” Mr. Clemons’s semifictional memoir from 2009, written with Don Reo. “Who are these guys? Where did they come from? What is the joke they are sharing?”

    Clarence Anicholas Clemons was born on Jan. 11, 1942, in Norfolk, Va. His father owned a fish market and his grandfather was a Southern Baptist preacher, and although he grew up surrounded by gospel music, the young Mr. Clemons was captivated by rock ’n’ roll. He was given an alto saxophone at age 9 as a Christmas gift; later, following the influence of King Curtis — whose many credits include the jaunty sax part on the Coasters’ 1958 hit “Yakety Yak” — he switched to the tenor.

    “I grew up with a very religious background,” he once said in an interview. “I got into the soul music, but I wanted to rock. I was a rocker. I was a born rock ’n’ roll sax player.”

    Mr. Clemons was also a gifted athlete, and he attended Maryland State College (now the University of Maryland Eastern Shore) on a scholarship for football and music. He tried out for the Dallas Cowboys and the Cleveland Browns, but a knee injury ended his hopes for a football career.

    He was working as a youth counselor in Newark when he began to mix with the Jersey Shore music scene of the late 1960s and early ’70s. He was older than Mr. Springsteen and most of his future band mates, and he often commented on the oddity — even the liability — of being a racially integrated group in those days.

    “You had your black bands and you had your white bands,” he wrote in his memoir, “and if you mixed the two you found less places to play.”

    But the match was strong from the start, and his saxophone soon became a focal point of the group’s sound. In an interview with The New York Times in 2005, Jon Landau, Mr. Springsteen’s manager, said that during the recording sessions for “Born to Run,” Mr. Springsteen and Mr. Clemons spent 16 hours finessing the jazzy saxophone solo on that album’s closing song, “Jungleland.”

    Mr. Clemons’s charisma and eccentricity extended offstage. Wherever the band played, he made his dressing room into a shrine he called the Temple of Soul. He claimed to have played pool with Fidel Castro and won. And by many accounts, including his own, he was a champion partier on the road. He was married five times and divorced four. His fifth wife, Victoria, survives him, as do four sons: Clarence Jr., Charles, Christopher and Jarod.

    Mr. Springsteen put the E Street Band on hiatus on 1989, and apart from reuniting for a recording session in 1995, the group did not play again until 1999. But by the mid-1980s, when Mr. Springsteen reached his commercial peak, Mr. Clemons had already found fame on his own. In 1985 he had a Top 20 hit with “You’re a Friend of Mine,” on which he sang with Jackson Browne, and played saxophone on records by Aretha Franklin and Twisted Sister. Recently he was featured on Lady Gaga’s album “Born This Way.”

    Mr. Clemons’s first encounter with Mr. Springsteen has become E Street Band lore. In most tellings, a lightning storm was rolling through Asbury Park one night in 1971 while Mr. Springsteen was playing a gig there. As Mr. Clemons entered the bar, the wind blew the door off its hinges, and Mr. Springsteen was startled by the towering shadow at the door. Then Mr. Clemons invited himself onstage to play along, and they clicked.

    “I swear I will never forget that moment,” Mr. Clemons later recalled in an interview. “I felt like I was supposed to be there. It was a magical moment. He looked at me, and I looked at him, and we fell in love. And that’s still there.”

    Copyright. 2011. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved
     

  • Hamilton aims to restore his F1 title hopes in Valencia

    June 18, 2011

     

    June 18, 2011 — Updated 2022 GMT (0422 HKT)

    English driver Lewis Hamilton had a nightmare race in Canada as he failed to finish after several incidents on the street circuit.
    English driver Lewis Hamilton had a nightmare race in Canada as he failed to finish after several incidents on the street circuit.

    STORY HIGHLIGHTS
    • McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton has finished second in Valencia for past three years
    • He likes the street circuit but has struggled recently at similar tracks in Monaco and Canada
    • Englishman trails world champion Sebastian Vettel by 76 points after seven races
    • His teammate Jenson Button is on a high after his final-lap victory in Montreal

    (CNN) – Lewis Hamilton is hoping to make it third time lucky when the Formula One roadshow returns to Europe next weekend.

    The McLaren driver has dropped to fourth in the standings, 76 points behind Red Bull’s world champion Sebastian Vettel, after his controversial performances in Monaco and Montreal.

    F1 legend Niki Lauda called for him to be punished for his aggressive approach, while a sixth placing and a DNF dented Hamilton’s hopes of adding to his 2008 championship success after only seven of 19 scheduled races this season.

    But the European Grand Prix is held at the Valencia track where he has finished second for the past three years, and the Englishman is hoping to improve his fortunes after disappointment on similar street circuits the last two times out.

    F1 championship standings after Canadian GP

    This will be our third street circuit in a row, so hopefully it’ll give me the chance to reverse the bad luck I’ve encountered in the previous two
    –Lewis Hamilton

    “Valencia will be a weekend of consolidation after two disappointing results in Monaco and Canada. Those two races were particularly frustrating for me because we showed we had the pace to win both of them, yet I only came away with eight points,” Hamilton told the F1 website.

    “I’ve always gone well at Valencia, finishing second there in every race, and I really enjoy attacking the track. It’s a difficult circuit with no let-up, but that won’t deter me as I’m really keen to get back on track and get back in the points.

    “This race will be our third street circuit in a row, so hopefully it’ll give me the chance to reverse the bad luck I’ve encountered in the previous two. We’ve arguably had the fastest race car in the last three races, and that’s really encouraging because I know that, when it’s put to best use, I should be able to finish at the front.”

    Hamilton’s teammate Jenson Button moved up to second place overall with a dramatic last-lap victory at the Canadian Grand Prix last weekend, but is still 60 points behind runner-up Vettel.

    “I had a few days’ break immediately after the race, which was perfectly timed as it gave me the opportunity to take in all the positive memories of a crazy weekend, and to reflect on an incredible race,” the 2009 world champion said.

    “I wouldn’t say that winning in Montreal has given me extra motivation, because I was already totally committed, but I think it will help to sharpen the focus and conviction of everyone in the team. We’ve proved we can challenge and beat Sebastian, and we know we can fight for this world championship.

    “I’m looking forward to Valencia. I had a good race there last year (finishing third) and I think the track shares some of the characteristics of Montreal and Monaco, so I’m confident that we’ll be competitive again. The trick will be to find enough performance in the race to overcome any potential difficulties in qualifying. It’s a hard place to pass.”

    Vettel won in Valencia last year and is hopeful that he can return to first place on the podium, where he has been five times so far this season — most recently at Monaco.

    “The atmosphere around the harbor in Valencia is quite similar to Monaco, except that the paddock is bigger and the garages are larger,” the German said.

    “It is a street circuit, but the average speed (200 km/hr) is extremely high, so it’s tricky. In general you need a lot of wing for the corners and less for the relatively long straights, which means you have to find a compromise.

    “There are no run-off zones, so you can’t make any mistakes — a small slide and you end up in the wall. Overtaking is difficult and the only real possibility is in Turn 12.”

    Vettel’s Red Bull teammate Mark Webber is hoping to improve on last year, when he failed to finish.

    “Valencia hasn’t been an incredible venue for me in the past but I’m looking to try and break the duck this year,” said the Australian, who is third in the drivers’ standings.

    “I quite enjoy driving the last sector of the track, as it’s got a really good combination of corners which are challenging. It’s a circuit that’s yet to provide a phenomenal F1 race, but we’ve seen some special ones this year so hopefully this is an opportunity for Valencia to add its name to the list.”

     

     

     

    Copyright. 2011. CNN.com. All Rights Reserved

  • Tatum O’Neal Opens Up

     

    In her recent memoir, the Oscar-winning actress talks about reconnecting with her estranged father, actor Ryan O’Neal. In an in-depth interview, she dishes to Marlow Stern on her much-ballyhooed 2008 drug arrest, “dating” Michael Jackson, advice for Lindsay Lohan, and patching things up with Dad on their upcoming docuseries Ryan and Tatum: The O’Neals, premiering June 19th on OWN.

    June 14, 2011 11:25 PM EDT

    While the perils of child stardom in Hollywood have been well documented—from Judy Garland to Lindsay Lohan—few celebrity bildungsromans are as heartbreaking as that which befell Tatum O’Neal.

    After she became the youngest Oscar winner in history at age 10, taking home the hardware for her role in Paper Moon—opposite her father, Ryan O’Neal (Love Story)—Tatum’s life quickly spiraled out of control. Motivated in part by alleged physical and emotional abuse by her father, she began smoking marijuana at 12, and soon got into Quaaludes and cocaine. That same year, Tatum alleged her then 18-year-old pal, actress Melanie Griffith, dragged her into an opium-fueled orgy. At 15, she was left abandoned when her father ran away with the former pinup goddess, Farrah Fawcett, and before she reached the age of 16, Tatum had been molested by two men and two women (one of the men was her father’s longtime friend). When she was 18, she started using cocaine to lose weight, and in 1995, following the end of her tumultuous eight-year marriage to tennis star John McEnroe—and three children together—she got hooked on heroin.

    All of this was chronicled in her 2004New York Times bestselling memoir, A Paper Life, of which her reportedly furious father told the New York Daily News, “It is a sad day when malicious lies are told in order to become a ‘best-seller.’” Love truly is a battlefield.

    Tatum has been sober for the past seven years, but made front-page headlines in 2008, when she was arrested purchasing crack cocaine near her apartment in the Lower East Side of Manhattan. The actress opens up about her journey toward recovery and reconnecting with her father in her recent memoir, Found: A Daughter’s Journey Home, and the reality docuseries Ryan and Tatum: The O’Neals, which premieres June 19 on the Oprah Winfrey Network. In a wide-ranging interview with The Daily Beast, she discusses her relationship with her father, the 2008 drug arrest, “dating” Michael Jackson, the tough road for child stars like Lindsay Lohan, and much more.

    My father doesn’t really remember what I look like. He sees blond hair, a black dress, and to him, that’s just a chick.”

    Tatum O'Neal Book

    Michael Nagle, The New York Times / Redux

    You say in your recent memoir, Found, that writing your first memoir, A Paper Life, didn’t really bring the catharsis you had hoped, and instead reopened some old wounds.

    It is what it is. It was a book and it told a story that was sad, and deep, and painful. This book is telling a different story. It’s telling of how I can live the best life that I can when I wasn’t really wanted, in a way. Maybe I was wanted by a fan base because of my work, but I didn’t feel that I was ultimately wanted by my own parents, which was a weird feeling.

    A Paper Life seemed to be a purging of your many demons, whereas this book seems to be a lot more reflective.

    It’s where I’m at then, and it’s where I’m at today; sort of telling who I am and where my journey is. If you end up with say, a heroin addiction, some people end up with it because of nothing. Their parents were perfect. For me, I had a lot of pain and bruising that happened to my soul, and I didn’t feel wanted, so in writing the first book, it took a minute for me to think about how to heal yourself. Is it writing a book, is it talking to a therapist, is it taking drugs, is it not taking drugs? It’s about figuring stuff out.

    Were you motivated to write this book in part because of the way the media treated you during your 2008 drug arrest?

    The cop was extremely joyful, when he found out who I was, to have made this arrest. He really wanted to make me feel bad and embarrass me, so that’s why he told the story about me trying to get out of it [by allegedly saying “Do you know who I am?”]. I’d ask anybody to be in a situation like that, whether you’re getting a DUI or a speeding ticket, how they’d feel? They’d try to get out of it, too. But it’s New York and I’m an actress. If the press wanted to do to me what they’re doing to Anthony Weiner—I mean I didn’t cheat on my wife, hold my penis and send pictures. I did something illegal, and I got caught. And actually, it ended up being a good thing because it stopped the run I may have gone on.

    Found: A Daughter's Journey Home by Tatum O'Neal. William Morrow. 224 p. $15.47

    Found: A Daughter’s Journey Home by Tatum O’Neal. William Morrow. 224 p. $15.47

    One of the things that seemed to buoy you toward recovery is your move to L.A. For many people, New York City is such a populated place, but it often fosters a sense of loneliness and isolation because people are so self-involved.

    That’s a really interesting observation. I wasn’t from here. My ex-husband [John McEnroe] is from here, and I moved with him. But there was no way that after all the custody fights, and after fighting so hard, I was going to leave with my kids still here, because that would mean I’d leave them with [McEnroe]. That was not going to happen. When Emily, my daughter, got into school in California, that was my time to move. And a shift did happen. But it’s just part of a shift, not the entire thing.

    You say in your book that Jon Hamm warned you against doing a reality show, so I’m wondering why you chose to go that route with Ryan and Tatum: The O’Neal’s?

    The term “reality show” is really scary because there’s been some really bad programming. What we did was something very different. It’s deep. I sort of thought it would be fun to work with my dad again, in some weird way. He’s never yet said he’s the guy that I’ve portrayed him as in my book—first book or second book—so I thought perhaps he’d have that “aha moment” and he’d be like, “You know what, I’m really sorry, Tatum. You didn’t have to have the life you had, and I’m here, and I take responsibility.” That didn’t happen. But oh well. I think it’s interesting television.

    One of the things I was taken aback by in the book was your father trying to pick you up at Farrah Fawcett’s funeral.

    My father doesn’t really remember what I look like. He sees blond hair, a black dress, and to him, that’s just a chick. A girl. He didn’t know it was me, so he kind of swooped in, and I had to remind him he was 70, and I was his daughter. That’s the second time that’s happened to me with him, but you know, he lives in another world.

    Farrah and Michael Jackson passed away the same day. That’s a pretty full-circle thing for you, to have your first “public” boyfriend and your father’s great love that sort of drove a wedge between you two, pass at the same time.

    [Michael] was somebody I knew and I did go on a date with, but I don’t know about my first “public boyfriend.” Let’s call that the media’s take on my first “public boyfriend.” First of all, how sad to lose two f***ing icons. Secondly, it sort of canceled Farrah out a little bit because she didn’t get the moment that I think she deserved and could have had. At the same time, this is life, man. This isn’t about who’s going to get the better farewell.

    It’s interesting, because you say in your book that your father was disapproving of all your boyfriends except for Michael Jackson. He said he knew how much Michael “adored” you.

    He liked Michael Jackson but he likes famous people. He’s that guy. But I don’t think he wanted me to have any dates the same way I didn’t want him to have any dates.

    Aside from Judy Garland, you were one of the first child stars who succumbed to the perils of fame and celebrity—namely, drugs. And now, we have Lindsay Lohan, who seems to be going down a similar path.

    My experience of that, and my opinion, is that for human beings, you need to grow into the world and figure out who you are in the world, and make your own identity. If you’re young and making your identity through what other people, or your fan base, think of you, there’s a loss of perspective. So, when you reach adolescence and start to change, it becomes difficult to do that. Are you what they think of you? Are you what you think of you? You don’t know any more who you are. That’s the problem of getting into a field where you’re really at the mercy of public opinion.

    Does it worry you then, since you’ve been down this road, that stars are getting younger and younger these days?

    I feel like as long as your parents are like Dakota [Fanning’s], you’ll be okay. As long as you have parents who are standing by you. Let’s face it: it’s not really reality if you’re making more money than most adults make in their lifetime, and people love you that have never met you. That’s going to change things on the schoolyard. With that kind of unreality, people lose sight of little brains versus adult brains. It’s easy to lose track with parents who are oblivious or in it for the wrong reasons or have their own problems.

    One of the incidents in your book that I found particularly troubling was with Gavin, your father’s longtime friend who molested you, and how your father invited you over to his home even though he was expecting him at the same time.

    I don’t know if he even admits that happened. He read the [recent] book and said he came off “like a boob.” It’s such a dumb way of him verbally portraying himself. I think he’s oblivious. We’ve never, ever talked about it in person. And as far as acknowledging what’s happened to me, I’m moving on. I’ve written books and made a show about it, he can do whatever he wants. I know the truth. I live comfortably with myself, and I wouldn’t want to live in his shoes, to be honest. I’m not the only one who said he did what he did. My brother says it, too. And [Ryan] has been arrested and shot at my brother. You start to go, “Okay, you go ahead and deny it. It’s only going to hurt your piece of mind.” Maybe he’s got a brain damage thing where it turns off and turns on. I don’t know.

    So he’s perhaps bipolar?

    Yeah, maybe. He’s just never gotten it checked out.

    What was the big takeaway from filming your docuseries on OWN, and how did it impact you and your fathers’ relationship?

    The truth is, it was hard and sort of painful at times, because I was on this truthful mission trying to get him to talk and acknowledge me. Now, I’m going to start crying. [Tearing up] If you don’t acknowledge me even for who I am today, as the mother that cares for her children or a person that’s alive and not shooting drugs, that’s what I wanted. I didn’t even care if he said, “I’m sorry.” But, it didn’t happen. And that’s interesting to watch because I’m not alone; it happens in a lot of families, where sons don’t get their father’s love, or daughters don’t get their father’s love. It’s a universal problem.

    What was Oprah’s level of involvement, and have you heard feedback from her on the show?

    The good news is we didn’t hear from her and now she’s on vacation, so my understanding is that she loves it. I’m a huge fan. Did she call me personally? No. But that’s okay.

    Did you send your father a manuscript of the book before it came out?

    Well, he wanted me to, but I didn’t. I sent him the book right before it came out. I think he thought I was going to write an “I love you” book to my dad, because of the first book, that went, “Dear Dad, I’m so sorry for hurting your ego and pride in my first book, but here is an ‘I’m sorry’ book.” So, anything that wasn’t completely loving in this book, he wouldn’t have liked.

    Now that this book is out, and you’re finished filming the first season of your docuseries, how would you characterize you and your father’s relationship today?

    We are good, this moment. That is not to say that if I felt like I was in any way disrespected, or if he tries to push me or get me to do something for him—he’s coming to New York and we’re going to do press together, and they’re going to ask him questions he’s not going to like, and his way is to look at little me, Tatum the daughter, and have me try to get them to stop. Or, he’ll blame me for putting him in that position. If he starts to do that then we’re not okay, and I’ll just be like, “You’re on your own.” But that may not happen, either. I’m always sort of wary, but right now we’re good.

    Will there be a second season of the show?

    Who knows. It’s up in the air. They have to hear back on ratings and other stuff.

    What are your future plans?

    I’m in the process of building a brand, if you will. I’m talking about a brand that could help other people, so with books, or speaking, or shows that I produce. The thing that helps me get better is the feeling that it’s helped someone else. Because of that, I’m grateful, and that is what’s inspired me to keep going.

    June 14, 201111:25 pm

     

  • Being Ernest: John Walsh unravels the mystery behind Hemingway’s suicide‏

    •  

    America’s most celebrated writer, Ernest Hemingway, ended his life 50 years ago – in a manner his biographers have struggled to explain.

    By John Walsh


    Saturday, 11 June 20

    11

    Hemingway travelling with US soldiers, in his capacity as war correspondent, on their way to Normandy for the D-Day landings in 1943

    GETTY IMAGES

    Hemingway travelling with US soldiers, in his capacity as war correspondent, on their way to Normandy for the D-Day landings in 1943


     

     

     

    Fifty years ago, in the early hours of Sunday 2 July, 1961, Ernest Hemingway, America’s most celebrated writer and a titan of 20th-century letters, awoke in his house in the Sawtooth Mountains of Idaho, rose from his bed, taking care not to wake his wife Mary, unlocked the door of the storage room where he kept his firearms, and selected a double-barrelled shotgun with which he liked to shoot pigeons. He took it to the front of the house and, in the foyer, put the twin barrels against his forehead, reached down, pushed his thumb against the trigger and blew his brains out.

     

    His death was timed at 7am. Witnesses who saw the body remarked that he had chosen from his wardrobe a favourite dressing gown that he called his “emperor’s robe”. They might have been reminded of the words of Shakespeare’s Cleopatra, just before she applied the asp to her flesh: “Give me my robe. Put on my crown; I have immortal longings in me”. His widow Mary told the media that it was an unfortunate accident, that Ernest had been cleaning one of his guns when it accidentally went off. The story was splashed on the front page of all American newspapers.

    It took Mary Welsh Hemingway several months to admit that her husband’s death was suicide; and it’s taken nearly 50 years to piece together the reasons why this giant personality, this rumbustious man of action, this bullfighter, deep-sea fisherman, great white hunter, war hero, gunslinger and four-times-married, all-round tough guy, whom every red-blooded American male hero-worshipped, should do himself in. How could he? Why would he? Successive biographers – AE Hochtner, Carlos Baker, KS Lynn, AJ Monnier, Anthony Burgess – have chewed over the available facts, his restless travelling, his many amours, the peaks and troughs of his writing career. But eventually it took a psychiatrist from Houston, Texas, to hold up all the evidence to the light and announce his disturbing conclusions.

    The idealised life of Ernest Hemingway, the one the writer himself wanted the world to buy, was simple: he was the perfect man, the perfect synthesis of brain and brawn. Driven by a thirst for adventure, he was a swashbuckling, hard-drinking pugilist who loved being in the thick of the action, whether in the front line of battle or within charging distance of a water buffalo. He also happened to be the finest writer around, disdaining the grandiose wordiness of Victorian prose for a clean, stripped-back simplicity, conveying emotion by what was not said as much as by what was. Wounded on the Italian front in the First World War, he was a handsome convalescent who fell in love with a pretty nurse and wrote A Farewell to Arms as a result. In the 1920s, he was at the forefront of American writers and artists who hung out in Paris, “being geniuses together”. They included F Scott Fitzgerald, who (according to A Moveable Feast) once showed Hemingway his penis and confessed his worry that it was too small to satisfy his wife Zelda; Hemingway kindly reassured him it was OK.

    In the 1930s, he went to Spain to fight for the republic against Franco and wrote For Whom the Bell Tolls, in which a brave American hero falls in love with a peasant guerrilla called Maria. In the Second World War, he was at the Normandy landings and the liberation of Paris. After the war he retired with his fourth wife to Cuba, where he fished for marlins and wrote The Old Man and the Sea, won the Nobel Prize, was lionised wherever he went – but was killed in an unfortunate firearm accident.

    That’s the official story. In the years after his death, however, the jigsaw pieces of a counter-life gradually began to emerge. His war record, for instance. Hemingway was only 18 when he signed up for the First World War – but it was as a non-combatant. He had a defective left eye, inherited from his mother, which kept him out of battle. He went to Italy to man the Red Cross canteens and evacuate the wounded. Helping a wounded man to safety one evening, he was shot in the leg and hospitalised in Milan, with three other patients and 18 nurses. Though his dalliance with Sister Agnew von Kurovsky was unconsummated, he fell in love with European culture and manners, swanned about in an Italian cloak, drank wine and affected a clipped delivery borrowed from a British officer, Eric Dorman-Smith.

    In Paris, where he enjoyed a temporary idyll with his first wife Hadley and their baby John (or “Bumby”), Hemingway started to make his name as a writer – but also to display dangerous mood swings, irascibility, spite and a compulsion to turn against those who helped him. He dumped Hadley and the baby and took up with Pauline Pfeiffer, a decision for which he was racked with nightmares of guilt, and moved to Key West, Florida.

    For some reason, he became obsessed with bullfighting: the glorification of blood, the spilt horse-guts, the matador’s passes with the cape and sword, the art of killing. In Death in the Afternoon, Hemingway seemed to be working out some personal philosophy about death, but it was hard to follow. The critic Max Eastman complained that his prose style had become the equivalent of “false hair on the chest”. Unable to participate directly in killing bulls, Hemingway decamped to Mombasa where he could legitimately blaze away at lions and kudu. Not content with land-based mayhem, he bought a 38-foot cruiser called the Pilar to fish, in Key West and Havana, for marlin and other aquatic creatures twice the size of himself. Between 1928 and 1936, he seemed to spend months posing beside up-ended fish trophies, the self-burnished image of the muscular man of action, handsome, tanned, drinking with the sailors in Sloppy Joe’s bar.

    He went to Spain during the civil war, not to fight, like George Orwell, but because he was commissioned to report on it for the North American Newspaper Alliance – and because his new love, Martha Gellhorn, was going there. He stressed many times that he wasn’t taking sides, and didn’t want to see the USA embroiled in a foreign war. In Madrid, despite the bombardment, he had the time of his life – enjoying caviar and vodka at the Gaylord Hotel, the Russian HQ, making a movie called The Spanish Earth and supplying its gravelly commentary, writing his broadly fictional dispatches for newspapers that criticised them as “very inefficient”. He looked the part of a hunky warrior, but he was a lucky dilettante, who could have left Spain any time he liked. He wrote a play about Madrid in 1936 called The Fifth Column, about Dorothy, a plucky female journalist, who falls for Philip, a tough, intrepid, hard-drinking spy masquerading as a war correspondent. Self-projection turned into self-parody.

    When America entered the Second World War in 1944, Hemingway got himself to England on “priority war business” – writing pieces about the RAF for Collier’s magazine. It was a tough assignment. He took a room at the Dorchester, where he held court as the Great American Writer and went to parties, receiving compliments on his beardy, macho wonderfulness.

    When he was concussed in a car accident that followed a drunken party with Robert Capa the photographer, Martha Gellhorn – who’d travelled to England in a ship packed with high explosives – visited him in hospital and laughed at his footling mock-heroics. As though stung into action, he headed for the war, joining the invasion fleet to Normandy and, later, General Patton’s armoured divisions. He was a so-so war correspondent who was simultaneously a sort-of-warrior. At the liberation of Paris, he was found in a hotel with a small private army. When asked to leave by a French general, he liberated the Traveller’s Club and the Ritz, taking a room at the latter to entertain his new love, Mary Welsh…

    It’s easy to be spiteful about Hemingway. All his posturing, his editing of the truth, his vainglorious fibbing can obscure his undoubted bravery. He loved being in the thick of the war – the tank advance through the Ardennes, the Battle of the Bulge – dodging bullets, watching men being shot to hell all around him. But it’s hard to shake off the feeling that what he was doing wasn’t bravery, but psychotic self-dramatisation. And when you inspect the image of Hemingway-as-hero, you uncover an extraordinary sub-stratum of self-harming. You discover that, for just over half of his life, Hemingway seemed hell-bent on destroying himself.

    It was about the time he was finishing A Farewell to Arms, in 1928, when he learnt that his father Clarence had shot himself in the head with a Civil War revolver, that Hemingway’s life first began to crack apart. The most obvious external evidence was a succession of bizarre physical accidents, many of which were bashes on the head. One, in Paris, left him with a split head needing nine stitches, after he yanked the chain in the bathroom, thinking it was the lavatory flush, and pulled the skylight down on top of him. He became weirdly accident-prone. His car accident that occasioned his row with Martha saw him hurled through the windscreen, lacerating his scalp and requiring 57 stitches. Three months later, he came flying off a motorbike evading German fire in Normandy. He suffered headaches, tinnitus, diplopia, showed speech and memory problems for months. Back in Cuba after the war, he tore open his forehead on the rear-view mirror when his car skidded. Five years later, while drinking, he slipped on the deck of the Pilar, and concussed himself. Why, you’d almost think he was trying to emulate his late father, and his self-imposed head wound.

    The most egregious injury, however, occurred in January 1954. He and Mary took off from Nairobi in a small plane, heading for the Belgian Congo. Near Victoria Falls it crash-landed in a thorn thicket and Ernest sprained his shoulder. As rumours of his death spread, he and his companions were rescued and put in a 12-seater De Havilland Rapide which – incredibly – burst into flames on the runway. Finding the door jammed, Hemingway volunteered to use his head as a battering ram, butted the door twice and got out. He liked to present it as a classic example of superman pragmatism, but it nearly killed him. He fractured his skull and lacerated his scalp; cerebrospinal fluid seeped from his ear. In Nairobi he was diagnosed with grave overall concussion, temporary vision-loss in the right eye, deafness in left ear, paralysis of sphincter muscle, first degree burns on face, arms and head, sprained arm, shoulder and leg, crushed vertebra and ruptured liver, spleen and kidney. Astonishingly, he was at it again only a month later: helping to extinguish a small fire, he fell into the flames and suffered second degree burns on legs, belly, chest, lips, left hand and right forearm.

    Hemingway’s taste for chronic self-immolation was matched by his prodigious feats of drinking: “The manager of the Gritti Palace in Venice tells me,” wrote Anthony Burgess later, “that three bottles of Valpolicella first thing in the day were nothing to him, then there were the daquiris, Scotch, tequila, bourbon, vermouthless martinis. The physical punishment he took from alcohol was … actively courted; the other punishments were gratuitous – kidney trouble from fishing in chill Spanish waters, a torn, groin muscle from something unspecified when he was visiting Palencia, a finger gashed to the bone in a mishap with a punchbag…”

    The drinking got worse after his father shot himself. Ernest went to a doctor in 1937, complaining of stomach pains; liver damage was diagnosed and he was told to give up alcohol. He refused. Seven years later, in 1944, when Martha Gellhorn visited him in hospital, she found empty liquor bottles under his bed. In 1957, his doctor friend AJ Monnier wrote urgently, “My dear Ernie, you must stop drinking alcohol. This is definitely of the utmost importance.” But even then, he couldn’t stop.

    What was bugging Hemingway? Why all the drinking, the macho excess, the manic displays of swaggering? Why was he so drawn to war, shooting, boxing and conflict? Why did he want to kill so many creatures? Was he trying to prove something? Or blot something out of his life?

    Some answers were offered in 2006 by a long article in the American Psychiatry magazine, called “Ernest Hemingway: A Psychological Autopsy of a Suicide”. It was by Christopher D Martin, whose official title is Instructor and Staff Psychiatrist at the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston Texas. Martin had read widely in the 15 or so biographies and memoirs of Hemingway and offered his expert analysis – based, inevitably, at second hand, but still a convincing evaluation. He had no trouble in diagnosing the author as suffering from “bipolar disorder, alcohol dependence, traumatic brain injury, and probably borderline and narcissistic personality traits”. He notes that many in the Hemingway family – his father and mother, their siblings, his own son and his grand-daughter Margaux – were prone to manic-depression (Margaux’s was the fifth, or possibly sixth, suicide in four generations) and suggests that it was Ernest’s manic episodes that drove him to his astonishing feats of creativity. But he locates the writer’s trauma in two childhood experiences.

    It seems that it was his mother Grace’s habit to dress him, as a child, in long white frocks and fashion his hair like a little girl’s. It was a 19th-century custom to dress infants alike, but she took it to extremes. She referred to him, in his cute lacy dress, as “Dutch dolly”. She said she was his Sweetie, or, as he pronounced it, “Fweetee”. Once, when Ernest was two, Grace called him a doll once too often. He replied, “I not a Dutch dolly… Bang, I shoot Fweetee”. But she also praised him for being good at hunting in the woods and fishing in the stream in boys’ clothes. It was too confusing for a sensitive kid. He always hated her, and her controlling ways. He always referred to her as “that bitch”. He’d spend the rest of his life in a galloping parody of masculinity. Dutch dolly indeed. He’d show the bitch there was no confusion in his head.

    “I shoot Fweetee.” The trouble was, he also wanted to shoot his father. Clarence Hemingway was a barrel-chested, six-foot bully, a disciplinarian who beat his son with a razor strop. Ernest didn’t retaliate directly. He bottled it up and subsumed it into a ritual, in which he’d hide in a shed in the family backyard with a loaded shotgun and take aim at his father’s head. Martin speculates that, when Clarence shot himself, Hemingway, aged 29, felt terrible guilt that he’d fantasised about killing him. Unable to handle this, he took to blaming his mother for his father’s death. “I hate her guts and she hates mine,” he wrote in 1949. “She forced my father to suicide.”

    After Clarence’s death, Hemingway told a friend, “My life was more or less shot out from under me, and I was drinking much too much entirely through my own fault”. He suffered a chronic identity crisis. Henceforth he could be warm and generous or ruthless and overbearing. His friendships were often unstable (he could turn vicious or cruel, even with supposedly close pals) and his relations with women were full of conflict. He sulked like a child when, on his first safari, his wife Pauline shot a lion before he did. And he was pursued, for the rest of his life, by a colossal death wish – either to join his late father, or to expatiate his guilt at his father’s death by mirroring it.

    Death took up residence at the heart of Hemingway’s life, a constant spur to his creative imagination, a constant companion, a dark, secret lover. Themes of violence and suicide informed his stories from the start. His letters are full of references to his future suicide. And when not contemplating his own death, he was putting himself into danger and combat as though to hasten it. Wars, rebellion, bull-running in Pamplona, big-game hunting in Africa, fishing in Havana – they were all his way of throwing himself before the Grim Reaper. “I spend a hell of a lot of time killing animals and fish,” he told Ava Gardner, “so I won’t kill myself.”

    And of course writing was his way of evading the need to die. He could polish his real-life experiences at war, in Italy, Spain, the Ardennes, and burnish his life in hindsight. Being awarded the Nobel Prize in 1954 must have been a triumphant affirmation of his genius, but he worried that, after receiving the prize, most laureates never wrote anything worthwhile again. Luckily, after finding two trunks of notes from the 1920s in a Paris hotel, he was able to manage one more book: A Moveable Feast, his touching memoir of being young, poor and happy in the French capital, with his first wife and baby, before everything started going to hell.

    After 1960, however, he found he could no longer write. The words wouldn’t come. Depression came instead, and with it (as we learn from AE Hotchner’s memoir, Papa Hemingway), paranoid delusions. He thought that the two men he saw working late in a bank were “Feds”, checking his bank account for irregularities. He thought his friends were trying to kill him. When his car slightly grazed another vehicle, he fretted that he’d be thrown in jail. It was a sorry thing, to see the epitome of “grace under pressure” succumbing to dementia.

    He was given medication and, horribly, a course of electroconvulsive shock treatments. In the spring of 1961, he was asked to contribute a single sentence to a presentation volume for John F Kennedy’s inauguration. Hemingway couldn’t oblige. “It just won’t come any more,” he told Hotchner, and wept. In April, his wife Mary found him sitting with a shotgun and two shells. He was sent to hospital in Ketchum, Idaho, his birthplace, but he tried twice more to end his life, once by walking into the path of a plane taxiing on the runaway. There was a two-month period of hospitalisation and comparative peace and quiet, when he appeared sane to his doctor and deranged to his wife. He seemed to be acting, right to the end. He was released home one more time, had a picnic lunch with wine (he saw some state troopers and was sure they’d arrest him for possess of alcohol) and, the next morning, shot himself.

    “The accumulating factors contributing to his burden of illness at the end of his life are staggering,” writes Martin, listing Hemingway’s bipolar mood disorder, depression, chronic alcoholism, repetitive traumatic brain injuries, the onset of psychosis. But it seems clear that the defining problem of his life was his experience of childhood. His confusion over gender, his Oedipal desire to kill his father for beating him, together led to what Martin calls “a retreat into a defensive façade of hyper-masculinity and self-sufficiency”.

    Building and sustaining the myth of Hemingway the Man’s Man took courage and determination, but it was something he needed to do – and when it dwindled, along with the all-important capacity to write, he had no answer except to go the same way as his father. The image of his father, a moody, bullying, depressive man, but a role model none the less, haunted his life. He wanted to revivify him, in order to release himself from the responsibility for his death. He wanted to be the big, strong, heroic man that the world could call “Papa”.

    Fighter, writer, lover: a life in brief

    1898 Ernest Hemingway is born in Oak Park, Illinois

    1918 Wounded in Italy while working for the Red Cross during the First World War

    1921 Marries first wife Hadley Richardson; they move to Paris

    1923 First son John is born

    1927 Divorced by Hadley, he marries Pauline Pfeiffer

    1928 His father Clarence shoots himself in the head

    1937 Works as a war correspondent during the Spanish Civil War

    1940 For Whom the Bell Tolls is published; Hemingway marries Martha Gellhorn

    1944 Reports on the liberation of Paris; begins relationship with Mary Welsh who he will marry in 1946

    1952 The novella The Old Man and the Sea is published

    1954 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature

    1961 Shoots himself in the head in Ketchum, Idaho

     

     

    ©independent.co.uk All Rights Reserved