Month: January 2011

  • Musical Innovation: A Grander Grand Piano

    Stuart and Sons piano
    Courtesy of Stuart and Sons

    This Stuart and Sons piano features veneer made from 2,000-year-old logs and an ebony border.

     
    January 18, 2011

    Most pianos have 88 keys. And most great piano music comes from the middle of the keyboard — only rarely do the player’s fingers venture onto the tinkly keys at the top of the keyboard, or the booming bass notes at the bottom. But a craftsman in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, thinks the instrument has room to grow; and he wants to nudge the piano out of complacent middle age. He has designed a grand with an unprecedented 102 keys.

    The Stuart and Sons grand piano has 14 more keys than most, which means its lowest and highest notes live very much on the edge. Its designer, Wayne Stuart, says a few other grands can play as low as this 102-key model, but none can play as high.

    “I’d hate to go back to the 88-key piano,” he says. “I couldn’t stand it. It’s too limited.”

    The extra notes might lend themselves to great feats of acrobatics, but they’re not exactly musical. So why have them?

    For color, Stuart says, and resonance. “There’s a tremendous amount of energy in the low-octave notes, and you can hear the power.”

    The power is evident even in pieces where the lowest notes aren’t played.  Concert pianist Gerard Willems has recorded most of Beethoven‘s works on a Stuart grand, and he found the extra keys made a difference.

    Stuart and Sons piano
    Enlarge Courtesy of Stuart and Sons

    This piano is made from Tasmanian Huon pine, a type of ancient timber found in southwest Tasmania.

    Stuart and Sons piano
    Courtesy of Stuart and Sons

    This piano is made from Tasmanian Huon pine, a type of ancient timber found in southwest Tasmania.

    “Beethoven would have loved the sound of the Stuart piano,” he says. Beethoven only had about 70 keys on his piano and would surely have used more notes if he’d had them, he says.

    But don’t focus too much on the keys, Willems says. This Stuart piano has other innovations, like a device that makes the strings vibrate differently, so each note sings out clear and separate. “It’s almost like pulling wool apart — you can feel and sense and smell each layer of the sound.”

    But if the Stuart piano is going to attract more attention, it has to attract living composers — to write for it. And slowly, that’s happening.

    New Age jazz musician Fiona Joy Hawkins has composed pieces for the Stuart piano, and she says it’s the best piano she’s ever played on. A single note on the Stuart, she says, can sustain for a long time.

    “It just doesn’t have any bend in the decay — it just goes straight. It goes forever, so you get these incredible harmonics that last,” she says.

    Some people say the Stuart has a distinctly Australian sound — as clear and bright as sun on the beach.  But in Australia, the instrument has its critics. Pianist and music professor Geoffrey Lancaster would not say this piano is “sunny.”

    “I find the sounds very cold,” Lancaster says. “They don’t have that dimension of warmth that, say, a great Steinway or a great Bosendorfer has. It’s this clarity — this so-called clarity or crystalline quality, it’s really quite icy.”

    The Stuart grand can’t compete with a giant like Steinway; only about 40 of the grands have been sold worldwide. But Lancaster says the Stuart raises an important question: When do we stop innovating?

    “The idea 150 years ago was that each piano should be a masterpiece in its own right, and should not necessarily resemble the piano that was made before it,” Lancaster says. “That’s all changed, of course. So I’m all for innovation in the modern piano. To me, the piano is a pinnacle of human achievement. So it seems right and proper that it should continue to develop.”

    How you innovate, he says, depends, as always, on personal taste. But if you want to debut with a Stuart, you’ll also need money: It costs up to $300,000, delivered.

     

    Copyright.2011. NPR.com. All Rights Reserved

  • This Is Mark Zuckerberg’s New Home

  • It’s Time for Apple to End the Code of Silence

  • Jets back up their talk with 28-21 win over Patriots

    Santonio Holmes

    Jets receiver Santonio Holmes celebrates after scoring a touchdown against the Patriots in the fourth quarter of their AFC divisional playoff game Sunday. (Adam Hunger / Reuters / January 16, 2011)

     

    Jets back up their talk with 28-21 win over Patriots

    New York, which had lost by 42 points at New England six weeks earlier, will face Pittsburgh in the AFC championship game.

    By Sam Farmer

    8:30 PM PST, January 16, 2011

    Reporting from Foxborough, Mass.

    Advertisement

    Same old Jets.

    Back in the AFC championship game.

    Unbelievably, undeniably, unapologetically back.

    “Only thing is, we plan on winning this one,” a beaming Coach Rex Ryan said after his 10-point underdogs defeated the New England Patriots, 28-21, in a divisional playoff game at Gillette Stadium. The victory came on the same field where the Jets lost by 42 six weeks earlier.

    Just as it turned that tiresome refrain — “Same old Jets” — on its head, New York flipped Tom Brady’s world upside-down. Shoo-in for another most-valuable-player award or not, he was sacked five times and — for the first time since Oct. 17 — had one of his passes intercepted.

    “He was a little confused out there,” Jets cornerback Darrelle Revis said.

    Asked if he was stunned the Patriots’ season is over, Brady said: “You always are. It’s like you’re on the treadmill running at 10 miles an hour, and then someone just hits the stop button.”

    There is plenty of fodder for water-cooler conversations in New England, including a botched fake punt by the Patriots and the apparent benching of receiver Wes Welker, who broke ranks and poked fun at Ryan in a news conference last week.

    Welker sat out the first series, and although there were reports it was because of his comments, Coach Bill Belichick declined to comment on the situation after the game.

    As for the shivering fans at Gillette, they saw their top-seeded Patriots stumble to a second consecutive one-and-done playoff performance at home. The bitter-cold place was as quiet as a library.

    “That’s a tough way to end it,” Belichick said. “We’re a better team than [the way] we played today. But we weren’t today.”

    So the Jets forge ahead, having knocked off Peyton Manning at Indianapolis and Brady at New England. Now, what Ryan calls “Mission: Impossible 3″ — the AFC championship game on the road against Ben Roethlisberger and the Pittsburgh Steelers.

    Those three quarterbacks — Manning, Brady and Roethlisberger — have amassed a combined six Super Bowl rings over the last decade.

    The Jets are not trembling.

    “We don’t fear anybody,” said linebacker Bart Scott, whose team posted a 22-17 victory at Pittsburgh last month. “We believe that we can match up against anybody. That’s all we try to establish at the beginning, no matter how cocky or arrogant we may sound.”

    The war of words that led into the game against the Patriots was mostly one-sided, with the Jets doing most of the talking and New England ostensibly lying in wait.

    Turns out New York’s bravado was more than words. It was fat-lip service. Brady, who destroyed the Jets in a 45-3 victory Dec. 6, looked frustrated and at times bewildered by New York’s defensive pressure.

    “This isn’t the first time we played good on defense,” said Ryan, whose team reached the AFC title game last season before losing at Indianapolis. “We know a little bit about playing defense.”

    Making his way around the Jets’ locker room after the game, slapping shoulders and shaking hands, was former NFL coach Marty Schottenheimer, whose son, Brian, is New York’s offensive coordinator.

    The elder Schottenheimer was pleased with the offensive performance but said the Jets’ defensive showing was a masterpiece.

    “That was the best pass coverage I’ve seen against the Patriots all year,” he said. “There was a defender contesting every throw. It’s the best defense, coverage-wise, that I’ve seen. How many times was Brady running around back there because he couldn’t find somebody? That doesn’t happen very often in a rhythm passing system like they have.”

    The Jets know how to put points on the board, and second-year quarterback Mark Sanchez had a tremendous game. He threw three touchdown passes and was neither sacked nor intercepted, logging a passer rating of 127.3.

    Sanchez is a club-record 4-1 in playoff games with twice as many postseason victories as Jets Hall of Famer Joe Namath.

    “He’s only been in the league for two years,” Ryan said. “I mentioned last year, one day he’s not going to be looked at as the weakness of the team. He’s going to be looked at as the strength, and I think you’re seeing that right now.”

    The Patriots’ only lead came in the first quarter, when they opened the scoring with a field goal. As a stunned crowd looked on, the Jets scored two touchdowns in the second quarter for a 14-3 lead.

    New England trimmed the deficit to 14-11 with a touchdown and two-point conversion in the third quarter, but the Jets roared back in the fourth with a spectacular touchdown catch by Santonio Holmes. He made a brilliant diving grab in the back corner of the end zone, just getting a knee and his toes down before rolling out of bounds.

    “Mark put the ball where only I could get it,” said Holmes, who made the Super Bowl-winning catch for Pittsburgh two years ago.

    “Every time the ball’s in the air and coming to [jersey No.] 10, it’s a catchable pass. I don’t care who’s covering me.”

    More big talk? Maybe, but the Jets have backed it up so far.

    “We talk because we believe in ourselves,” Ryan said. “That’s where all that talk comes from. … For some reason, I don’t know, maybe I’m not always wrong on everything I say.”

    sam.farmer@latimes.com

    twitter.com/latimesfarmer

    var enqsiteid = ’16a34cace44211de953eb76e8f05c239′; var enqhost = ( .protocol == “https:”) ? “https://logssl” : “http://log”; document.writeln(‘<'+'script src="'+ enqhost +'.enquisite.com/log.js?id='+ enqsiteid +'" type="text/javascript"><'+'/script>‘); var s_account = “tribglobal”; s.pageName=”Jets back up their talk with 28-21 win over Patrio – Latimes.com / sports – Print – Option.”; s.prop38=”Print – Option”; s.eVar21=”Print – Option”; s.server=”latimes.com”; s.channel=”Latimes.com:sports”;s.prop3=”";if(!!window.carnival){ carnival_username_c_unm = readCookie(‘c_unm’); carnival_masterid_c_mid = carnival.metrics.getMetricsId(); if(carnival_username_c_unm!=null && carnival_masterid_c_mid){ s.prop28 = carnival_masterid_c_mid; }}if(s.prop28==null){ s.prop28 = “”;} s.prop32=”"; s.prop36=”"; s.prop37=”"; /* Taxonomy Variables */s.prop46=”Sports / NewYorkJets”;/* E-commerce Variables */s.events=”"; s.eVar20=”Latimes.com”; s.hier1=”Latimes.com:sports”; s.hier2=”sports”; s.hier4=”sports”; s.prop44=”la-sp-jets-patriots-20110117″;//AD Block Detection//Description: Check if any IMG, IFRAME, or SCRIPT elements are ad blocked (set to not display).// Also check for the occurance of any Norton installed code to block popups or ads ( ie.)SymError ).// Only need to find 1 occurrance of any of the above to confirm ad blocking is used. // No need to continue searching through other portions of the page.var imgArray = document.images;var iframeArray = document.getElementsByTagName(“iframe”);var scriptArray = document.getElementsByTagName(“script”);var isAdBlocked = 0;if(window.SymError || window.SymWinOpen || window.SymRealWinOpen){ isAdBlocked=1;}if (!isAdBlocked){ for (var i=0; i=0)document.write(unescape(‘%3C’)+’!-’+'-’)//–> DM_addEncToLoc(“Site”, (s.server));DM_addEncToLoc(“channel”, (s.channel));DM_addEncToLoc(“keyword”, (s.prop3));DM_cat(s.hier1);DM_tag(); (function() { var old = s.ot; s.ot = function(el) { return el.tagUrn ? ” : old(el); }; })(); (function () { var d = new Image(1, 1); d.onerror = d.onload = function () { d.onerror = d.onload = null; }; d.src = ["//secure-us.imrworldwide.com/cgi-bin/m?ci=us-400338h&cg=0&cc=1&si=", escape( .href), "&rp=", escape( ), "&ts=compact&rnd=", (new Date()).getTime()].join(”); })();

  • Retreat of the ‘Tiger Mother’

    Bob Daemmrich/Polaris

    The author at a 2007 book signing.

    Lorenzo Ciniglio/Polaris

    Amy Chua, author of “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother,” with her husband, Jed Rubenfeld, and daughters Lulu, left, and Sophia.

    January 14, 2011

    Retreat of the ‘Tiger Mother’

    TRY this at a dinner party in one of the hothouses of Ivy League aspiration — Cambridge, Scarsdale, Evanston, Marin County:

    Declare that the way Asian-American parents succeed in raising such successful children is by denying them play dates and sleepovers, and demanding that they bring home straight A’s.

    Note that you once told your own hyper-successful Asian-American daughter that she was “garbage.” That you threatened to throw out your other daughter’s dollhouse and refused to let her go to the bathroom one evening until she mastered a difficult piano composition. That you threw the homemade birthday cards they gave you as 7- and 4-year-olds back in their faces, saying you expected more effort.

    Better yet, write a book about it.

    What kind of reaction might you get?

    In the week since The Wall Street Journal published an excerpt of the new book by Amy Chua, a Yale law professor, under the headline “Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior,” Ms. Chua has received death threats, she says, and “hundreds, hundreds” of e-mails. The excerpt generated more than 5,000 comments on the newspaper’s Web site, and countless blog entries referring in shorthand to “that Tiger Mother.” Some argued that the parents of all those Asians among Harvard’s chosen few must be doing something right; many called Ms. Chua a “monster” or “nuts” — and a very savvy provocateur.

    A law blog suggested a “Mommie Dearest” element to her tale (“No. Wire. Hangers! Ever!!”). Another post was titled “Parents like Amy Chua are the reason Asian-Americans like me are in therapy.” A Taiwanese video circulating on YouTube (subtitled in English) concluded that Ms. Chua would not mind if her children grew up disturbed and rebellious, as long as she sold more books.

    “It’s been a little surprising, and a little bit intense, definitely,” Ms. Chua said in a phone interview on Thursday, between what she called a “24/7” effort to “clarify some misunderstandings.” Her narration, she said, was meant to be ironic and self-mocking — “I find it very funny, almost obtuse.”

    But reading the book, “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother,” it can be hard to tell when she is kidding.

    “In retrospect, these coaching suggestions seem a bit extreme,” she writes in the book after describing how she once threatened to burn her daughter’s stuffed animals if she did not play a piano composition perfectly. “On the other hand, they were highly effective.”

    In interviews, she comes off as unresolved. “I think I pulled back at the right time,” she said. “I do not think there was anything abusive in my house.” Yet, she added, “I stand by a lot of my critiques of Western parenting. I think there’s a lot of questions about how you instill true self-esteem.”

    Her real crime, she said, may have been telling the truth. “I sort of feel like people are not that honest about their own parenting,” she said. “Take any teenage household, tell me there is not yelling and conflict.”

    Ms. Chua is one half of the kind of Asian-Jewish academic power couple that, as she notes, populates many university towns. Her husband is Jed Rubenfeld, also a Yale law professor, and the author of two successful mystery novels. Ms. Chua, herself the author of two previous books, was reported to have received an advance in the high six figures for “Tiger Mother.”

    If she has one regret, she said, it is that the Journal excerpt, and particularly the headline, did not reflect the full arc of her story.

    Her book is a memoir that ends with her relenting (sort of) when the younger of her two teenage daughters refuses to go along with the “extreme parenting” Ms. Chua uses to prevent the kind of decline that she thinks makes some third-generation Asian-Americans as soft and entitled as their teammates on suburban soccer teams where every child is declared Most Valuable Player.

    “I’ve been forced to answer questions about a book I didn’t write,” she said. “It’s not saying what people should do, it’s saying, ‘Here’s what I did, and boy did I learn a lesson.’ ” All this is captured, she said, in the book’s three-paragraph subtitle, which concludes with the words, “and how I was humbled by a thirteen-year-old.”

    Born to Chinese parents who were raised in the Philippines and attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ms. Chua, 48, graduated from Harvard and Harvard Law, where she was an executive editor of the Law Review. She confesses in her book that she is “not good at enjoying life,” and that she wasn’t naturally curious or skeptical like other law students. “I just wanted to write down everything the professor said and memorize it.”

    She was determined to raise her daughters the way she and her three sisters had been raised — which, she said, left them adoring their parents. By her account, her elder daughter, Sophia, complied, excelled and played piano at Carnegie Hall. But the younger, Lulu, rebelled. At the turning point of the memoir, Lulu, then 13, begins smashing glasses in a Moscow restaurant and yelling at her mother, “I HATE my life, I HATE you.”

    Ms. Chua’s husband appears only peripherally in “Tiger Mother” — though there is one battle in which she lashes out at him after he worries that she is pushing their daughters to the point that there is “no breathing room” in their home.

    “All you do is think about writing your own books and your own future,” she says to him. “What dreams do you have for Sophia or for Lulu? Do you ever think about that? What dreams do you have for Coco?” He bursts out laughing — Coco is their dog.

    She concludes, “I didn’t understand what was so funny, but I was glad our fight was over.”

    Initially, Ms. Chua said, she wrote large chunks about her husband and their conflicts overchild rearing. But she gave him approval on every page, and when he kept insisting she was putting words in his mouth, it became easier to leave him out.

    “It’s more my story,” she said. “I was the one that in a very overconfident immigrant way thought I knew exactly how to raise my kids. My husband was much more typical. He had a lot of anxiety, he didn’t think he knew all the right choices.” And, she said, “I was the one willing to put in the hours.”

    Still, she said, her children got pancakes and trips to water parks because of their father, the son of parents more inclined to encourage self-discovery.

    The reaction to the book was particularly anguished among those who are products of extreme Asian parents. “I’m horrified that she’s American-born and hanging on to this, when most of us are trying to escape it,” said Betty Ming Liu, the daughter of Chinese immigrants from Vietnam and author of one of the many blog posts about the book. A California woman recalled how her sister became the perfect Asian daughter Ms. Chua aspires to produce, only to kill herself because she was afraid to tell anyone she suffered from depression.

    Ann Hulbert, the author of “Raising America,” a history of a century’s worth of conflicting child-rearing advice, who is writing a book about child prodigies, notes that it is not hard to reignite the Mommy Wars.

    “There is a kind of utter certainty in her writing,” she said of Ms. Chua, “and that confidence goes so against the underlying grain of American parenting and child-rearing expertise that it immediately elicits a response that then suggests a kind of certainty on the other side that isn’t there, either.”

    Friends describe Ms. Chua as self-deprecating and a dry wit, her children as happy, and their home as humming with music and activity and, yes, love.

    “Not that she’s without opinion, but she’s writing a memoir, not a parenting guide,” said Alexis Contant, who describes Ms. Chua as her closest friend for 20 years. “She will say sleepovers are overrated, but I have never heard her say, ‘I can’t believe so-and-so let their kid do it.’ ”

    Ms. Chua said that her daughters have been eager to speak out in favor of the book; she is shielding them from the publicity. She said, however, that they did ultimately have play dates — though not many between the ages of 9 and 13, due to music practice. Sophia, now 18, has a boyfriend, she told me. “My kids have whatever those things are called — iPods,” she said. “They have iTunes accounts.”

    Ms. Chua wrote most of the book in eight weeks, yet struggled with the end, she said, reflecting the East-West tug on her parenting. “It’s a work in progress,” she said. “On bad days I would say this method is terrible. I just need to give them freedom and choice. On good days, when Lulu would say: ‘I’m so glad you made me write that second draft of my essay. My teacher read it out loud,’ I think, I’ve got to stick to my guns.”

    This week, her book tour will take her to the places where she has surely sparked the most debate: the Bay Area, Cambridge and the northwest quadrant of Washington.

    But first, the family was planning to celebrate Lulu’s 15th birthday. They were taking her and eight of her friends to New York City. For a sleepover.


    Copyright 2011. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved.

     

  • Snowfall Blankets Region and Snarls Flights

    Gary Hershorn/Reuters

    A woman crossed a street during a snow storm in Hoboken, New Jersey. More Photos »

     

    Hiroko Masuike for The New York Times

    Sanitation Department trucks were staging early Wednesday on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. More Photos »

     

    January 11, 2011

    Snowfall Blankets Region and Snarls Flights

    A ferocious winter storm that tore across the southeastern seaboard slammed into New York City overnight, forcing the cancellation of thousands of flights and threatening train, bus and rail service for millions of commuters across the region Wednesday.

    However, the Department of Education announced early on Wednesday morning that all public schools in New York City will be open despite the winter storm.

    The giant amoeba-shaped snowstorm officially touched down in Central Park between 8:30 and 9 p.m. Tuesday, the National Weather Service said. But hours earlier, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg had already declared a weather emergency, something he did not do during the Dec. 26 and 27 blizzard that paralyzed the city with 20 inches of snow.

    By the time the storm started pummeling the region, hundreds of flights throughout the three major New York airports had been canceled, and nearly every domestic flight through Wednesday afternoon — thousands — had been scrubbed. Service on some subway lines, like the B train, was suspended earlier than usual Tuesday night, and Long Island Railroad officials said they had canceled some trains Wednesday morning and would replace them with buses. Metro North scaled back to a Sunday schedule.

    With the arrival of snow in New York and the unusually severe storm in the South — which dumped more than a foot of snow in some areas — the National Weather Service said an unusual nationwide occurrence had taken place. There was now snow on the ground in every single one of the 50 states — including Hawaii, which had snowfall on one of its volcanoes — except for Florida. New York City was also well on its way to surpassing the 22.4 inches of snowfall in a normal season, with 21.8 inches as of Tuesday, said Christopher Vaccaro, a weather service spokesman.

    Many New York City streets – even busy Manhattan thoroughfares like 34th Street – were a slippery mess Wednesday morning, with cabs slowly inching along to avoid accidents. Dozens of suburban school districts decided to shut down as the force of the storm became apparent.

    Unlike his reaction to the previous blizzard, Mayor Bloomberg took major steps to show that the city was prepared for the worst. But his declaration of a weather emergency is not the same as a snow emergency, which would have required residents to remove their cars from about 300 designated routes. Instead, the city said New Yorkers could leave their cars on the streets, but by the curb, not in the traffic lanes. The declaration said that any vehicles “found to be blocking roadways or impeding the ability to plow streets” would be towed at the owners’ expense.

    The declaration was issued even though the snowstorm, the powerful product of a combination of the weather systems that had already disrupted daily routines in the South and the Midwest, had not yet reached the city.

    AccuWeather said it expected 6 to 12 inches here. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority was preparing for as much as 14 inches.

    Hours before the declaration, Mr. Bloomberg promised a better-coordinated response than the laggardly one that followed the blizzard. The mayor said the city had made significant changes to emergency procedures since then.

    “We recognize that we did not do the job that New Yorkers rightly expect of us in the last storm,” Mr. Bloomberg said at a news conference at City Hall. “We intend to make sure that does not happen again.”

    The city lined up the same street-clearing force that was left standing by on Friday, when less than two inches of snow fell in Central Park. Officials said 365 salt spreaders and 1,700 plows were ready to go. Some were to wait out the storm not at their depots but in the neighborhoods they were to clear.

    There were signs that the Sanitation Department started fending off the snow before it arrived, at least where plows were slow to show last month. Councilwoman Karen Koslowitz, a Democrat from Queens, said that by 2 p.m. Tuesday, the city had salted many streets in her district, which includes Forest Hills, Rego Park and Kew Gardens,

    The city also announced plans to send workers to shovel snow at intersections as soon as streets were plowed, and it began using social networking sites to advertise for more help. The New York City Housing Authority sent a message on Twitter that said: “Turn a snow day into a payday. The city is looking for snow removal help. Apply now.” It contained a link to a page that said the city would pay $12 an hour, which would increase to $18 an hour after 40 hours.

    The city’s subway, bus and rail networks pledged to run regular service on Wednesday morning, but all prepared for service changes. Officials made plans to halt express service on some subway lines on Tuesday night to move trains into tunnels and out of the snow for the night.

    Mr. Bloomberg faced criticism for not declaring an emergency as the blizzard bore down last month. His top aides have since apologized, saying a snow emergency declaration probably would have improved the response. On Tuesday, officials said the mayor had declared a weather emergency because it would give them more flexibility than a snow emergency.

    Last-minute shoppers jammed the aisles at some markets. Sandy Miller, who ventured into Citarella, a market on Third Avenue near 75th Street in Manhattan, said, “People were buying as if this storm is going to prevent them from eating for the next four days.”

    Reporting was contributed by Michael Barbaro, Michael M. Grynbaum, Javier C. Hernandez and Liz Robbins.

    Copyright 2011. The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved