Month: July 2010

  • Formula One World Championship – No Change Just Tightening

    Post image for Formula One World Championship – No Change Just Tightening

     

    by F1Fan on July 27, 2010

    The Formula One World Championship after the German Grand Prix didn’t change much, at least from an overall positions stand point. Its just got an awful lot closer at the top with Ferrari closing in on McLAren and Red Bull after Ferrari’s one two finish at the Hockenheimring circuit.

    google_protectAndRun(“render_ads.js::google_render_ad”, google_handleError, google_render_ad); Sebastian Vettel third place finish in his home country race allows him to draw level from a points perspective with his team mate Webber, although Webber is still shown ahead of Vettel because he has more actual race wins.

    2010 Drivers Championship After German Grand Prix

    PositionRace
    Number
    DriverTeamDriver
    Nationality
    Current
    Points
    12Lewis HamiltonMcLarenGB157
    21Jenson ButtonMcLarenGB143
    36Mark WebberRed Bull RacingAustralia136
    45Sebastian VettelRed Bull RacingGermany136
    58Fernando AlonsoFerrariSpain123
    64Nico RossbergMercedes GPGermany94
    711Robert KubicaRenaultPolandl89
    87Felipe MassaFerrariBrazil85
    93Michael SchumacherMercedes GPGermany38
    1014Adrian SutilForce IndiaGermany35
    119Rubens BarrichelloWilliamsBrazil29
    1223Kamui KobayashiBMW Sauber F1Japan15
    1315Vitantonio LiuzziForce IndiaItaly12
    1416Sebastien BuemiTorro RossoSwitzerland7
    1512Vitaly PetrovRenault7
    1617Jaime AlguersuariTorro RossoSpain3
    1710Nico HulkenbergWilliamsGermany2
    1822Pedro De La RosaBMW Sauber F1Spain0
    1919Heikki KovalainenLotus F1Finland0
    2020Karun ChandhokHRT F1 Team0
    2125Lucas Di GrassiVirgin RacingBrazil0
    2218Jarno TrulliLotus F1Italy0
    2321Bruno SennaHRT F1 TeamBrazil0
    2424Timo GlockVirgin RacingGermany0
    25Sakon YamamotoHRT F1 TeamJapan0
    last updated Jul 25, 2010
    Animated flag images by 3DFlags.com

    2010 Constructors Championship After German Grand prix

    PositionConstructorPoints
    1Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes300
    2Red Bull Racing272
    3Scuderia Ferrari208
    4Mercedes GP Petronas132
    5Renault F196
    6Force India47
    7AT&T William31
    8Scuderia Torro Rosso15
    9BMW Sauber F110
    10Lotus Racing0
    11HRT F1 Team0
    12Virgin Racing0
    Confirmed teams for the 2010 season
    Updated Jul 25, 2010

    So the constructors championship is turning into a real three horse race and after the Hungarian Grand Prix this weekend Ferrari may be even closer on points if they maintain their current performance.

    Copyright. Formula 1Racing Fan.com. 2010 All Rights Reserved

  • The Place to Be: Florianópolis, Brazil

    Lalo de Almeida for The New York Times

    Parador 12, one of the stars of the vibrant club scene in Florianópolis.

    January 11, 2009
    Party Destination of the Year

    The Place to Be: Florianópolis, Brazil

    PRINCE PIERRE CASIRAGHI of Monaco has paid tribute. The heartthrobs Ben Harper and Stavros Niarchos have partied on its beachfront dance floor. And on many Champagne-fueled nights, leggy models straight from the pages of Sports Illustrated and the Victoria’s Secret catalog have perched on its billowing banquettes.

    Never heard of Praia Café de la Musique? Don’t worry. It isn’t the latest poolside lounge in South Beach or some new members-only club in Manhattan. In fact, the club is in a resort well off the radar of TMZ and checkout-aisle glossies: Florianópolis in the southern reaches of Brazil.

    “It’s a mixture of St.-Tropez and Ibiza but without the attitude and without the prices,” said Jeffrey Jah, a former model and the impresario behind the New York City party spots Lotus and Double Seven. He opened Praia Café three years ago after he fell in love with Florianópolis.

    As South American jet-set spots like Punta del Este in Uruguay lose their novelty, affluent Brazilians and in-the-know internationals have taken the party to Florianópolis and the 40-odd white-sand beaches of the 33-mile-long island that makes up much of the city. Caipirinha-soaked lounges, stylish beach bars and cavernous megaclubs have sprouted all over the island. Once a favored spot of the surf-world cognoscenti, Florianópolis, some 450 miles southwest of Rio de Janeiro, has emerged as Latin America’s hottest new party destination.

    Each beach has its own personality and crowd. Party central is Jurerê Internacional, a chi-chi resort on the north end of the island. Rife with sports cars, Gucci handbags and the occasional private helicopter, it is home to the Praia Café (Avenida dos Merlins; 55-48-3282-1325; www.praiacafedelamusique.com.br), where the parties go until 4 a.m.

    Competing for the waves of deep-pocketed socialites is Parador 12 (Servidão J. Cardoso Oliveira; 55-48-3284-8156; www.eldivinobrasil.com.br), a Nikki Beach-like club that opened a year ago and is awash in Champagne served to bronzed bodies on white canopy beds.

    Making the biggest splash is Pacha (Rodovia Maurício Sirotsky Sobrinho; 55-48-3282-2054; www.pachafloripa.com.br), part of a chain of megaclubs that opened a branch near Jurerê Internacional in November. According to one of the owners, Johnny Mansur, both Jack Johnson and Amy Winehouse are booked this year for Pacha’s 15,000-seat outdoor concert area. To fill the huge 3,500-person club, Pacha has assembled an impressive roster of D.J.’s, including Roger Sanchez and Dirty South.

    The surfer set, meanwhile, flocks to Praia Mole, a long strip of talcum-like sand and world-class waves on the island’s east coast. Popular with wave riders, bikini girls and sculpted tanners, the beach is lined with oceanfront bars, notably the D.J.-fueled Barraco da Mole (55-48-3232-5585).

    Inland, the boho-chic town of Lagoa da Conceição has become the choice for Brazil’s artists, intellectuals and media types. Niched in a colonial edifice and outfitted with vintage furniture, Confraria das Artes nightclub (Rua João Pacheco da Costa 31; 55-48-3232-2298; www.confrariadasartes.com.br) is the pulsating epicenter of Lagoa da Conceição’s social scene.

    Florianópolis’s gay scene is thriving as well. Four years ago, the city began a gay pride parade, and in 2008 the first Brazilian-operated gay cruise, Freedom (55-11-3624-9007; mixbrasil.uol.com.br/mp/upload/noticia/8_119_67094.shtml) moored off Praia Mole for a major part of its route. During Carnaval in late February, the Week, a gay nightclub in São Paulo, will operate an offshoot in the Praia Mole Eco Village hotel (Rodovia Jornalista Manoel de Menezes 2001; 55-48-3239-7500; www.praiamole.com.br).

    With so many after-dark options to explore, concierge-style services have popped up to guide travelers through Florianópolis’s nocturnal sprawl. Nexus Surf (www.nexussurf.com), for example, has expanded its surf school to include tours of the island’s night life. And with the scene in constant flux, the outfitter even has a night-life director dedicated to tracking new openings. “Florianópolis night life blows away night life in L.A. or New York or anywhere else I’ve been,” said the founder of Nexus Surf, Hans Keeling, a transplanted Californian. Formerly a corporate lawyer, he visited a few years ago and was instantly won over.

    “Here you have the combination of Sunset Strip-style and Ibiza-style night life mixed in with the Brazilian proclivity for relaxing and having fun,” he said. “I looked around, and I saw better beaches, better night life, more beautiful people and cheaper prices. It was a pretty easy decision.”


     

  • Alonso Wins German Grand Prix 2010

    Andrew Hone/Getty Images

    Alonso during the race.

     

    July 25, 2010

    Alonso Wins German Grand Prix

    Filed at 3:32 p.m. ET

    HOCKENHEIM, Germany (AP) — Fernando Alonso won the German Grand Prix on Sunday for Ferrari, but the team was fined $100,000 afterward for orchestrating his pass of teammate Felipe Massa.

    Race stewards didn’t overturn Ferrari’s 1-2 finish, choosing to send the case to the sport’s governing body, which could impose more sanctions. Team orders that affect the result of a race are forbidden under Formula One rules.

    ”In the interests of the sport, we have decided not to go through a procedure of appealing against it, confident that the (FIA) world council will know how to evaluate the overall facts correctly,” Ferrari team chief Stefano Domenicali said.

    Alonso had more points in the title race and the team apparently felt it would be better served if he collected the 25 points that go to the winner rather than Massa.

    ”I don’t think I have to say anything to that,” Massa said when asked after the race about the instructions. ”We work for the team.”

    There was no immediate comment from Ferrari.

    Massa, racing on the first anniversary of a crash that nearly killed him, led the race for 49 of 67 laps before he was passed by Alonso following communications from Ferrari over the team radio. He looked unhappy after the race and the two drivers barely hugged as they climbed out of their red cars.

    Stewards said Ferrari was in breach of Article 39.1 of the International Auto Federation (FIA) 2010 sporting regulations.

    Article 39.1 says: ”Team orders that interfere with race results are prohibited.”

    Sebastian Vettel of Germany was third in his Red Bull. Championship leader Lewis Hamilton of McLaren was fourth.

    After 11 of 19 races, Hamilton leads the overall standings with 157 points ahead of McLaren teammate Jenson Button with 143. Vettel has 136 points, tied for third with Red Bull teammate Mark Webber. Alonso is fifth with 123 points, 38 ahead of Massa.

    ”I can’t say I am fighting for the championship,” Massa said.

    Alonso won his second race of the season and Ferrari finished 1-2 for the second time this year.

    ”In some parts of the race we were fighting very hard for first place, maybe it was a bit dangerous. It’s a difficult race to overtake,” said Alonso, a two-time Formula One champion who earned his 23rd career victory. ”We are professional, we try to do the best for the team.

    ”I don’t know what happened, but at the exit of turn six I saw Felipe a little bit slow. Sometimes you are quick, sometimes you are slow, and in some parts I was quicker than him, so it’s very difficult to judge.”

    Red Bull team principal Christian Horner said Ferrari appeared to impose team orders.

    ”It was surprising what happened with the Ferraris, it looked to be a team order with the cars switching positions,” Horner said. ”If so, it’s a shame for Formula One and the fans that they were deprived of a race between the two Ferrari drivers today.”

    The first of two decisive moments in the race took place at the start.

    Pole sitter Vettel moved wide to try to block Alonso. Massa, starting from third, used the gap to pass from the outside going into the first corner, where also Alonso managed to slip past Vettel. The two Ferraris stayed in front for the entire race.

    Then, on lap 49, Massa appeared to go slightly wide at a corner and Alonso easily shot past the Brazilian driver.

    Alonso had been pushing Massa hard for several laps and was heard saying on the team radio, ”This is ridiculous.”

    Alonso then overtook Massa, who had just been told by Ferrari over the radio: ”Fernando is faster than you, did you understand that message?”

    Having dropped into second, Massa was then told: ”OK, good lad. Just stick with him now.”

    Massa confirmed the radio conversation, but later also said he had been struggling after switching to harder tires.

    Massa said Ferrari did not have team orders.

    ”For sure you always want to win. We don’t have team orders. If you can’t do the race you want, you have to think about the team. I am professional, and today I showed how professional I am,” Massa said.

    ”Everyone saw that I can win races, that I can be competitive. But I was struggling on hard tires.”

    In later comments distributed by Ferrari, Massa said it was his decision to let Alonso pass.

    ”We drivers have to first of all think of the interests of the team and that is what I showed again today. In my opinion this was not a case of team orders: my engineer kept me constantly informed on what was going on behind me, especially when I was struggling a bit on the hard tires.

    ”So I decided to do the best thing for the team, and a one-two finish is the best possible result.”

    Alonso covered the 67 laps — a distance of 190.5 miles — in 1 hour, 27 minutes, 38.864 seconds. He finished 4.1 seconds ahead of Massa and 5.1 seconds ahead of Vettel.

    Asked about the passing maneuver of Ferrari, Vettel said: ”We get the check not from you guys but from the team.”

    Alonso, in his first season with Ferrari, won the opening race of the season in Bahrain, where Massa took second.

    But Ferrari has struggled in recent races and Alonso finished 14th in the British GP two weeks ago.

    Massa required surgery for a fractured skull sustained one year ago when he was struck on the helmet by a heavy metal spring that had come off another car during qualifying for the Hungarian Grand Prix.

    He was placed in an induced coma and spent nine days in a Budapest hospital.

    Massa returns to Hungary for next week’s Grand Prix.


    Copyright. New York Times Company. 2010. All Rights Reserved

  • Qualifying Results for German Grand Prix. 2010

    • German Grand Prix – Qualifying

    Driver reaction after qualifying

    ESPNF1 Staff
    July 24, 2010
    The Ferrari duo had a good session depite Fernando Alonso missing out on pole © Sutton Images
    Enlarge
    Related Links

    Ferrari

    Fernando Alonso – 2nd: “I am happy to be back on the front row after such a long time! We have been competitive all weekend, so this result is not a surprise: although perhaps the small gap to the Red Bull is, given that so far, even when we were close in free practice, or in Q1 and Q2, then in Q3, they always seemed to have that little bit extra. For a few races now, the F10 has improved a lot and that has finally led to us being in the fight for pole position. We have had a good Saturday, but now we have to do the same again on Sunday, as the points are only given out tomorrow. I am happy that Felipe is also in a good position as that means we can defend ourselves, particularly from the McLarens on the opening lap, because with their top speed they could pose a real threat. Tyres could be a significant unknown factor tomorrow: the track has improved so much over the past two days and we are using them much more than yesterday, so we could expect some surprises on the strategy front. The start? At Silverstone, the theoretically slower dirty side was actually cleaner and I hope the same will be true here! We will give it our all in trying to win, because looking at the classification, we need to bring home as many points as possible.”

    Felipe Massa – 3rd: “I am pleased with this third place, as it means I am in a good position for the start of the race. It gives us a chance to score a lot of points for the team and that is our objective for tomorrow, as we have lost too many in recent races! Therefore, we hope that the negative run that dates back to Canada will end here in Germany. The gap between my time and that of the first two is due mainly to the fact that I never managed to produce a perfect lap on my last run. Tomorrow, we will do our best: yesterday, we saw that our race pace is competitive and we will try to make the most of that. On this track, with so many slow corners and where it is important to have a car that is good under braking, the F10 seems to be working very well.”

    Stefano Domenicali: “We are very pleased with this result, even if there’s just a hint of regret that pole escaped us by a whisker. This result is down to the whole team, both at the track and at the factory, which over the past weeks, has put in an incredible effort to improve the performance of our car. Already, for the past three races, we could see we were getting better but, for various reasons and events, we did not pick up the results that were within our grasp. Now we have to remain focussed and prepare for tomorrow, down to the smallest detail. Above all, we hope we can finally have a normal race. The time has come to reap the rewards of all the work we have done so far.”

    Force India

    Adrian Sutil – 19th: “Not really such a great day for us! The weekend started so well and in the rain the car was so strong, but it’s not gone right today. This morning I had a problem with the driveshaft and missed the whole session. We also had to change the gearbox as a result of the problem so we knew that we would be facing a tough challenge with the five place penalty we would get. Then in qualifying I didn’t have any grip and the car was sliding around and we were only quick enough for 14th place. All the same it’s only qualifying and there’s a long race tomorrow where anything can happen.With a good strategy we can always go for a good result.”

    Tonio Liuzzi – 21st: “I had had a good couple of laps but then I hit a wet patch on the kerb or on the grass that wasn’t visible from the track and it then started the accident. I lost the rear and was pushed out quite strongly across the track and into the wall. I wasn’t hurt, but it’s such a shame as we lost the qualifying and now have to start far down the grid. We can still make up some places as we showed in the last race in Silverstone where I came back to 11th and under a second from the points, so the race pace is very strong – let’s see what we can do.”

    Otmar Szafnauer, chief operating officer: “Obviously we’re disappointed with the session today. We were hoping for more in qualifying but had technical problems with the driveshaft failure on Adrian’s car in FP3, which compromised his performance in qualifying. Tonio then had an accident at the last corner, which eliminated him in Q1. But as we always say there’s no points for qualifying. Our long run pace this weekend on both cars has been strong and both Adrian and Tonio are real fighters who will keep pushing until the flag. They have fought hard in the past and, even after the difficulties today, are exceptionally motivated to do it again here in Hockenheim.”

    HRT

    Sakon Yamamoto – 23rd: “It was my second qualifying in a row after Silverstone and here we could improve a lot compared to the last weekend. Today it was a bit disappointing as we had a shifting problem on my fastest lap, which needs to be investigated for tomorrow. During the race, the weather conditions will be different and I’m going to do my best and I hope to finish the race again.”

    Bruno Senna – 21st: “It feels like a really good qualifying for us and we have been closer to our competitors than expected. My lap was almost perfect as I could put all the sectors together. I think it was one of my best laps in qualifying this year, so I’m fairly happy. It was a good effort from the team and we will see how it goes tomorrow.”

    Colin Kolles, Team Principal: “Today we are happy with the result both drivers achieved in both sessions. Bruno Senna showed his best qualifying performance this season. Sakon Yamamoto learnt a lot from yesterday’s practices and could improve his performance. Unfortunately, he had a shifting problem which is going to be investigated. We could catch up with the other new teams and we are confident to race the other teams tomorrow.”

    Lotus

    Jarno Trulli – 17th: “I’ve had a great weekend so far. I’ve had no troubles with the car and I’ve been able to work on getting the right balance, and being comfortable with how the car feels in all the sessions. You can see from the lap time today just how good it’s been, so I’m really happy, but obviously we always have work to do, and the satisfaction comes from putting in the work and seeing results like the lap today. Tomorrow it’s all about pushing the guys ahead and getting both cars home again, so that’s where the focus is now.”

    Heikki Kovalainen – 18th: “It’s been quite a difficult weekend for me so far – it seems to be a bit harder than normal and I’m not sure why. The balance was ok today but the grip levels felt poor and I wasn’t able to get the best out of the tyres on either run. It felt like I was getting more out of them on the third lap each time, so we need to analyse that and see what’s behind it. Despite this we’re still in a good position. Jarno did a great lap and I got ahead of Glock pretty comfortably, so there’s everything to fight for tomorrow.”

    Mike Gascoyne, chief technical officer: “Mixed feelings today. A very good job from Jarno who was pretty happy with the balance of his car, but disappointing for Heikki who lost 3/10ths in a straight line to Jarno and we’ll have to look at the reasons for that. Overall he hasn’t been happy with the balance all weekend and I think the team didn’t do a good enough job on his car before qualifying. However, on the positive side we finished the best of the new teams, and we’re looking to take this form into the race tomorrow with a strong double finish.”

    Lewis Hamilton was outqualified by Jenson Button © Sutton Images
    Enlarge

    McLaren

    Jenson Button – 5th: “It took a little bit of time for us to get used to the balance of the car this weekend. I was pretty happy with my final lap, so I don’t know where the extra seven tenths [to pole] is. And that’s the slightly worrying thing: it was a good lap, and I don’t really think there was anything else I could’ve got out of the car. But we’ve definitely made a step forward with the blown diffuser – it’s still not quite enough in qualifying spec, but, hopefully, we’ll see some more performance tomorrow. From fifth on the grid, we can still have a good race, and this is a fun place to go racing. The first lap is usually pretty hectic, so I’ll be hoping to pass some cars early on. I definitely think we can get a great result tomorrow.”

    Lewis Hamilton – 6th: “My qualifying pace wasn’t great today – there was definitely a bit more time to be gained somewhere. I did the best job I could – it’s just that the two teams in front did a slightly better job. We’re the fastest down the straights, but we don’t have quite enough downforce at the moment. We’ll keep on pushing, but we know we have more work to do. Still, I think there’ll be an improvement in our performance relative to the others tomorrow, because our race pace is generally better than our qualifying pace. Hopefully, the weather will be good, too, so we can push the guys in front and try and make up some places.”

    Martin Whitmarsh, team principal: “No-one at Vodafone McLaren Mercedes is ever going to be fully satisfied by a qualifying session that results in our cars qualifying only fifth and sixth – but we have reason to be confident that our race pace will be stronger. Our straight-line speed is impressive – perhaps more than we needed for an optimal qualifying set-up – but it’s likely to pay dividends tomorrow. As ever, both Jenson and Lewis will be looking to make up places early on, and thereafter they’ll approach the race with their usual combination of combative ambition and disciplined adherence to a race strategy that we hope will bag them another decent haul of world championship points. And, having scored 149 points out of a possible 172 in the past four races, we’re focusing on maintaining our consistency above all else.”

    Mercedes

    Nico Rosberg – 9th: “I was hoping for a strong weekend here in Hockenheim in front of our fans but unfortunately I struggled a lot in qualifying today. It’s really disappointing and it seems that we are just not making our developments work as well as we hoped this weekend which we need to look into. I hope that we find the problem with the car otherwise it is difficult to explain why we are not closer to the front. I had a lot of oversteer and that made it really difficult as I had to keep coming down on the front wing levels which did not help. I will do my best tomorrow to achieve a good result but it will be difficult from this position.”

    Michael Schumacher – 11th: “There isn’t much more to say about qualifying other than the result was what was achievable for us today. Clearly it was disappointing because we had expected to be able to fight for fifth or sixth place but from the difference between our two cars, you can see our results are what the potential was. If I want to find something positive, it is that at least I will be starting from the better side of the grid and in the end, I prefer 11th to 10th place because of that. I had some issues with my brakes during qualifying but I do not rate that a real factor for the performance today. We are a bit stronger in race pace than in qualifying but we clearly wanted to achieve more for our fans. Let’s hope that tomorrow the race will develop in a way that we can still show them something.”

    Ross Brawn: “We obviously had a disappointing qualifying today at one of our home races, particularly considering the promise that we showed over the practice sessions. With the changeable weather conditions over the weekend and a new aero package on the car, clearly we haven’t understood how to get the best from it here. That’s eventually shown in qualifying today and the drivers were not able to extract any more performance from the car than their respective positions. We will look at all of the data available and understand what is happening to ensure that we make better use of the package in the future.”

    Red Bull

    Sebastian Vettel – 1st: “That was extremely exciting, especially in Q3. I knew that both times I went out I only had one timed lap, so I had to get it right. It’s difficult here, there are some places that can easily lead you into a mistake on this track. If you push too much then you can lose the edge of the tyres and some time. My final lap wasn’t 100% perfect and there were a couple of places where I went over the limit, which cost me some time. But, in the end, it was enough – although only just – to stay ahead and get the pole. I am extremely happy – thanks to the team. It is the first time I am on pole at home, but the main challenge will come tomorrow.”

    Mark Webber – 4th: “I made a mistake into Turn one on my final timed lap. I turned in a little bit late and cut the kerb, which took me out wide so I had to abandon the lap. It was a shame I couldn’t take advantage of the improving track conditions at the end of the session; it wasn’t the best day for me. I let the boys down a bit, but Seb did a good lap for pole. Fourth is still not too bad – let’s see what we can do from there in tomorrow’s race.”

    Christian Horner: “It was a fantastic lap from Sebastian to get pole at his home race, albeit by the tightest of margins. Mark was right up there throughout the two qualifying sessions and again the drivers were split by very little. Unfortunately he ran wide at Turn one at the start of his last timed lap, but first and fourth is still a strong team result and it promises to be a good race tomorrow.”

    Renault

    Robert Kubica – 7th: I am reasonably happy to be seventh on the grid and I think that, for now, we have to realise that we could not have qualified any higher than this. My lap could have been better, because I was held up by a Red Bull in the final sector, but I don’t think it would have changed my position. We have had a couple of issues with the car here and in Silverstone, and I have not felt as confident with it, so we know that it’s important to keep working to improve the feeling because that will give us more consistency. As for tomorrow’s race, we saw in Silverstone that anything is possible but we need a good start and a good first lap. We hope that our race pace will be strong, too, but we saw today that the gap to the teams in front is pretty big so I’m expecting a tough afternoon.

    Vitaly Petrov – 13th: It was another tough qualifying session for me. The lap times around the top ten were very close and I was still learning how to get the most from the car and the tyres at this track, then trying to put it all together in a single lap. In the end, getting it right is a question of experience, and I know that better results will come when I can bring the pieces together – even though I wasn’t far from the top ten today.

    Eric Boullier, team principal: I am pretty pleased with our qualifying performance today, considering that all of the teams ahead of us – and some behind – are running with the F-duct. It’s good to be the leading team without that system, and particularly nice to have Robert ahead of the two Mercedes – although he could have gone quicker had he not hit traffic on his fastest lap. Of course, our ambitions are greater than P7, but this was a good result today. On the other side of the garage, Vitaly didn’t quite make the cut for Q3 – but in his defence, the times were very close today and he was just a few tenths away.

    Sauber

    Kamui Kobayashi – 12th: “I am not happy because I should have gone through into Q3. The car was good and the performance in qualifying confirmed this. But on my second run in Q2 I had traffic and needed to slow down a bit. Obviously this wasn’t good for the tyre temperatures and I had a lack of grip afterwards. However, from 12th on the grid I should still be able to score points tomorrow.”

    Pedro de la Rosa – 14th: “I was certainly hoping to make it into Q3. Overall I think we have been closer to the top ten than expected. The car was good and it will be the same in the race tomorrow. On my second run in Q2 I pushed too hard and had a couple of big moments. This way I obviously couldn’t improve my lap time.”

    Peter Sauber, team principal: “The positive aspect of today is the fact our car made another step forward with regard to performance, otherwise we wouldn’t be able to compete at such a level. However, it’s disappointing we didn’t make it into Q3.”

    James Key, Technical Director: “We came in this morning after working over night on the cars to address some of the issues we found in dry conditions yesterday. Both drivers were happy with the cars this morning, and we looked reasonably competitive. We went to qualifying knowing we had a realistic chance of a getting into Q3. There was a big accident in the first session, and it was good to see Vitantonio Liuzzi walk away from that. Then it was about concentrating on getting the tyres to work. The first outings were reasonable. Kamui was in the top ten straightaway, but unfortunately we couldn’t get the most out of the new tyres on the second run, where we didn’t improve at all. That left us just outside the top ten. Ultimately it was disappointing, but I’m pleased the car has taken a step forward. We should be able to fight for points tomorrow.”

    Tonio Liuzzi brought out the red flag by crashing coming out of the final corner © Sutton Images
    Enlarge

    Toro Rosso

    Jaime Alguersuari – 15th: “To be honest I did not expect to be quicker than my team-mate today, as it has been a difficult weekend with not so much testing on a dry track. Therefore, I found it hard to get up to speed in the dry, but in the end, I managed it in qualifying, even if I might have been able to improve by one or two tenths. If it stays like this for the race, who knows what might happen as it is possible that tyre degradation will be a factor that might help me move up the order.”

    Sebastien Buemi – 17th: “Q1 went well, but I am not really sure what happened in Q2, as I was unable to make the most of the improving track conditions. We will have to see why that was, if it was down to the way we ran the tyres or some other reason to do with the set-up. Therefore I am rather disappointed that things did not go as well as expected. As for tomorrow’s race, there are a couple of places where you can overtake if you have the speed, so let’s wait and see what happens and a lot could depend on the weather. If it is dry, the key element of the strategy will be managing the usage of the soft tyre.”

    Giorgio Ascanelli: “After this afternoon’s session, we are looking a bit better than in Silverstone a fortnight ago, however that is mainly due to Liuzzi’s crash – I’m glad he seems okay – rather than due to our own efforts. ”

    Virgin

    Timo Glock – 23rd: “A very disappointing day after the promising start we made to the weekend yesterday. The gearbox problem we experienced this morning was very frustrating because it cost us the end of the session. The guys did a fantastic job, working through the break to get the car ready in time for Qualifying, but then after the first run we had a problem with the rear brakes and it was too risky to go out again. After the first set of tyres we were in front of Lotus but we couldn’t continue and therefore run the next set of options, so we don’t know how it could have panned out – we could have split the Lotus cars or even been ahead of them. It’s just very disappointing.”

    Lucas di Grassi – 24th: “It has been a very frustrating day for me and the team because we were looking so good in Free Practice and I think we could have done a really good job in Qualifying. But we had the alternator problem late in the session this morning and then it was clear on my Qualifying out-lap that there was a gearbox problem which could not be fixed in the time we had. We will do the best we can tomorrow in the hope that we can finish as the best of the new teams.”

    Nick Wirth, technical director “We are all extremely disappointed by today’s results. After a few encouraging laps on the drying track this morning, Lucas experienced an engine alternator failure and oil leak which caused the gearbox control system to temporarily lose control of the gearshift with the sudden electrical voltage drop. It was unclear at the time whether this had caused damage to the gearbox, and after successful tests in the garage before qualifying, we elected to try it rather than change the gearbox and take a grid penalty. Sadly, a gearbox problem quickly became apparent when he tried his first qualifying run and we’ll have to change his gearbox tonight. Timo’s hopes of a good showing in front of his home crowd were thwarted by a different gearbox problem in free practice which stopped him doing any meaningful running this morning and forced us to change his gearbox before qualifying. His first proper run of the day was a great effort, but a small brake caliper hose fitting leak was spotted as his final set of tyres were being fitted, and we simply couldn’t risk a final run. I guess the most annoying thing was that we have been unable to demonstrate the clear performance progress we have continued to make but hopefully we’ll get an opportunity to do this tomorrow.”

    Williams

    Rubens Barrichello – 8th: “It was a good day all told. In Q2, I set my best time and it was a fantastic lap, and in Q3 for some reason I developed a bit of understeer and lost some balance. So it was a bit of a shame not to be able to repeat the performance as I thought we were capable of P7. That said, we have to be happy with two cars in the top ten and it gives us confidence for good points tomorrow.”

    Nico Hulkenberg – 10th: “It was positive to get both cars into the top ten; I think there was a bit more there time-wise at around about Rubens’ pace, but I didn’t have the greatest run right at the end of Q3. All that said, we have a good platform for a strong race tomorrow.”

    Sam Michael, technical director: “Today was another good qualifying performance by the team and it is great to have both cars in the top 10. We believed we could get up to 7th, but we just missed a bit of time in the last sector relative to Q2. Looking to tomorrow’s race, our target is to put away more points with both cars. The weather here this weekend has made things interesting so far, but it’s still clear on the tyres and other items.”

    © ESPN EMEA Ltd.

  • British Grand Prix 2010. Silverstone

    2010 British Grand Prix: Favoritism stokes rivalry in “the Arena” [SPOILERS]

    2010 British Grand Prix – Click above for high-res image gallery

    A Formula One World Championship without a British Grand Prix would be almost unthinkable. After all, England claims the mantle of the series’ birthplace, and its GP (along with Italy’s) stands as the longest-running in motor racing.

    Despite all the history, this year’s British Grand Prix almost didn’t happen at all. At least, that’s what Bernie Ecclestone might have had us believe. Amidst declining conditions at Silverstone, which first hosted the race in 1948 and has held it exclusively since ’87, the contract almost went back to Brands Hatch (the track that alternated with Silverstone from ’63 to ’86). When that deal fell apart, Silverstone and its owner, the British Racing Drivers Club, sprung into action and implemented the first in a series of comprehensive renovations aimed at bringing the age-old circuit up to spec.

    The result was a contract for hosting the British GP for the next seventeen years and a new layout dubbed “the Arena”. After all the renovations, the negotiations and rivalry, the circus rolled into town and raced on the new track this weekend. Follow the jump to read how it went.




    Though the results from Saturday’s qualifying sessions may have come as no surprise to avid race fans, the controversy behind them spoke volumes. Having apparently failed to bring enough of its new front wings to Silverstone, Red Bull made the decision to take Mark Webber’s entire nosecone and give it to Sebastian Vettel after the young German damaged his during practice. Webber was left fuming, the public got a rare glimpse into the team’s favoritism dynamics, and Vettel took pole. Webber managed to bring in his downgraded RB5 for second place, ahead of Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso.

    McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton took fourth and Mercedes GP’s Nico Rosberg surprised with fifth ahead of Robert Kubica (Renault), Felipe Massa (Ferrari), Rubens Barrichello (Williams), Pedro de la Rosa (Sauber) and Michael Schumacher (Mercedes). Jenson Button struggled in qualifying to land 14th on the grid amongst the back-markers and midfielders.



    Undeterred, Webber squeezed his teammate and rival out at the first corner to take the lead. Vettel was forced off-track, puncturing a tire in the process, which sent him into the pits. A similar saga played out between the Ferraris as Alonso lost position and made contact with Massa, who also burst a tire and was forced into the pits along with Vettel. Both the front-running young guns re-emerged at the back of the field to fight their way up to the front once again.

    Subsequent laps saw few changes as Webber and Hamilton pulled away from their rivals. Kubica slipped past Rosberg for third, de la Rosa fell back several positions, and defending champion Button advanced to eighth position. With Hamilton unable to keep up with Webber, however, a long train of cars lined up behind Kubica.

    The rest of the field began pitting after around a dozen laps. Button was among the last to do so, advancing up to fourth position and rejoining the race in sixth place after swapping tires. By the time Webber hit the pits, he had opened up such an insurmountable lead that he rejoined the contest unchallenged in first place.

    2010 British GP

    Farther adrift, Alonso was forced off the track while battling Kubica on lap 17. Having gained position on the Renault by effectively (though unavoidably) cutting the chicane, the Ferrari driver would later be handed a drive-through penalty. Before he could take it, though, Kubica was sidelined with unspecified mechanical problems. Force India’s Sutil, meanwhile, tried to get past Sauber’s Pedro de la Rosa, whose car then lost part of its wing. Pedro would join Kubica on the pit wall as the safety car went out under yellow. Alonso would have to wait to execute his imposed penalty until the safety car was brought back in on lap 30, finally rejoining the race in 16th place on lap 32.

    Come lap 33, Webber remained in the lead, but his lead over Hamilton was cut down under the safety car. Rosberg remained in third ahead of Button, who was back up to fourth. Barrichello, Kobayashi (Sauber), Sutil, Schumacher, Hulkenberg (Williams) and Petrov (Renault) rounded out the Top 10 as frontrunners Vettel, Massa and Alonso (12th, 13th and 16th respectively) picked their way up the field.



    In a rather comical and unexpected turn of events, Massa temporarily lost control of his car coming around the final corner on lap 40, damaging his tire before regaining control on the pit lane entrance. Making the best of a bad situation, he took a surprise pit stop, catching the crew off-guard. The long pit stop that ensued dashed any hopes of his finishing inside the points. That didn’t stop him, however, from setting a hotly-contested fastest lap that would later be bested by Alonso.

    Across the line after 52 smooth laps, Webber took the checkered flag ahead of Hamilton. And what did Webber have to say for himself just as the broadcast tuned in to the race-winner’s radio? “Not bad for a #2 driver”. The message rang loud and clear to the Red Bull pit wall, with principal Christian Horner eating his hat as he sent a subordinate to collect the team’s trophy.




    Nico Rosberg stunned all with a solid podium finish, outshining his legendary teammate, Michael Schumacher, who finished in 9th ahead of Williams’ Nico Hulkenberg. In between, Button took fourth place, Barrichello an impressive fifth, Kobayashi a notable sixth, Vettel a frustrated seventh and Sutil a defiant eighth. Both Ferraris finished outside the points at the end of a disastrous day for Maranello.

    The results further cement Lewis Hamilton’s and McLaren’s lead in the championship standings with 145 drivers’ points and 278 constructors’, bolstered by Button’s 133 in second place. Webber and Vettel trail in third and fourth places with 128 and 121 points respectively, combining for 249 for Red Bull. The circus heads next to the Hockenheimring for the German Grand Prix on July 25.


    Gallery: 2010 British Grand Prix

     

    Copyright. Autoblog.com 2010. All Rights Reserved.

  • German Grand Prix 2010 Thursday Press Conference

    F1 – 2010 – Grosser Preis Santander von Deutschland – Hockenheim

    German GP – Thursday Press Conference

    FIA Press Conference — July 22nd – 6:07pm

    2010 GERMAN GRAND PRIX. THURSDAY PRESS CONFERENCE – July 22, 2010. DRIVERS: Timo GLOCK (Virgin), Michael SCHUMACHER (Mercedes), Adrian SUTIL (Force India), Sebastian VETTEL (Red Bull), Mark WEBBER (Red Bull).

    PRESS CONFERENCE
    Q: For four of you it’s your home race. Just a quick word on what it means to you. Your hopes and expectations. How much you enjoy it or maybe you don’t enjoy it. Timo, your comments.
    Timo GLOCK:
    Good to be back at Hockenheim again and I had a lot of good races here at Hockenheim, so really looking forward to it. I hope we have a smooth weekend and try to be in front of Lotus is our own target and we see.
    Adrian SUTIL: It is very nice to be here. I like this circuit and it is a home grand prix, so for a German driver it is something special. I want to perform well. I like it. A lot of people come here, a lot of guests, a few people from my family as well, so it’s nice. I will enjoy it definitely.
    Sebastian VETTEL: I think it is always nice to be back home. For me and Timo we are very close from this area, so sorry for the weather first of all but it is nice to be here. We all know the circuit very well and driving in front of your home crowd is always something special. We saw it the last race at Silverstone. The people were cheering a lot for Jenson (Button) and Lewis (Hamilton), so it is a bit of the same for us here. We are enjoying it and we all want to do well. I think apart from Michael none of us has won his home race yet, so that is the target for this weekend.

    Q: Michael, four times a winner here?
    Michael SCHUMACHER:
    Yes.

    Q: Your expectations and hopes? How much do you enjoy racing at home?
    MS:
    I think it is different to what it has been in the past as we come here as a kind of German national team. We have our main factory about 100kms from here. We went over there yesterday, so lots of support, lots of expectation in a way. It is good to see that compared to the previous years, ticket sales have gone up and interest has gone up although it is not fully sold out, but still there is a nice influence from that side. We naturally hope to have a decent and good race weekend to satisfy our guys.

    Q: Sebastian, you ran the Red Bull car in your home town last weekend. I was going to say is that the fastest you’ve ever been through the streets, but I won’t ask that question. What was it like?
    SV:
    It was great. It was in a 50kph zone in the city, so of course we didn’t exceed the speed limit. It was crazy. The night before I was actually a bit nervous about how many people will come and watch us and then the day after it was sunny. It was a fantastic day and we had more than 120,000 people coming, so they had to block the motorway and it was absolutely crazy. I didn’t see much of my old roads I used to go to school or the swimming pool or whatsoever as it was full of people. But it was very nice and I think we put on a good show. We also had a DTM car there and a guy with a motorbike, so all in all I think it was a great package and a lot of people came, so I hope they will make it as well this weekend. On Sunday I think it should be dry, so it will be nice.

    Q: A lot has happened at Red Bull since the last grand prix. Have you now set the re-set button between you and Mark? Are you now back to normal?
    SV:
    Well, I think as far as I understood if you said to Red Bull I think we are still selling cans, so not much has happened in that regard. A lot of talk and a lot of press but the most important thing you need to understand is that it doesn’t matter who wins the race. In the end we are a team and Red Bull Racing won the race on the Sunday. Mark did, so it was a great result. For some reason, or unfortunately, we didn’t get a lot of positive feedback. We know where the focus is. It is surely on this race and nowhere else. The team is motivated as ever, so the most important is the atmosphere within the team and for us it doesn’t get affected by what is being said or written.

    Q: Mark, your thoughts?
    Mark WEBBER:
    Yeah, it wasn’t a huge drama at the last race. Obviously there was a little bit of stuff here and there but first of all Sebastian did absolutely nothing wrong with me at the last event. That is totally obvious. Seb did what he did and had an incident at the first corner which was bloody unlucky for him. It can happen to any of us and the race from my side went okay with a great team effort. Unfortunately we didn’t get a one-two which we were more than capable of doing. The team is ready to go forward. We are both competitive and it is only natural the media and everyone wants to wind up a nice rivalry between whoever it is, but Seb and I are naturally going about our jobs. What we have in common is that we work for the same team, have the same passion and the same drive to get the same result and there is nothing wrong with that, so we are fine and the team is learning here and there along the way but it is a healthy learning. We are in a sensational position. Two years ago the team was not doing this type of results. Now we are and we are taking on the best teams in the pit lane, so it is an absolute credit to us and we are looking to continue that.

    Q: Mark, you have had something like five lock-outs of the front row of the grid, yet not one of those has been converted to a one-two in the race. Is that part of the learning curve?
    MW:
    Yes, it is but also there is an element of people saying we should be 5000 points in the lead. I don’t really think we should be for many reasons. Seb had a couple of victories taken away from him at the start of the year but also if you look in Turkey we were not fast enough. We had an incident on the track but we were not fast enough in the grand prix. Canada, we had a different tyre strategy there for qualifying and as the race turned out that was the result we deserved. We are not taking credit away from what other people are doing. At the end of the day there have been some calls from Jenson from the cockpit, a few great victories there and that’s how it has been. We look to capitalize on some of those qualifying positions in the future but there is no points given on a Saturday. We know that and we are looking to do better. It’s not like it’s a no-brainer on Sunday afternoon and we just drive off the front row and disappear. We have got some work to do and that is evident as you can see by the points.

    Q: Timo, first of all, your aims and the team’s concentration at the moment. Is it looking towards Lotus? What sort of performance are you still putting on the car? Where are the priorities now for you?
    TG:
    I think Silverstone showed the aero update worked quite well and we had, I would say, a second aero update in Silverstone. It doesn’t show in the results as we are still in the same position but we were much closer to Lotus. We could race against them in Silverstone and for here we should have another little update in terms of an aero package which will bring us another little step forward again, so that’s positive. It goes in the right direction. The first half of the year was tough to sort out all the problems but now it is becoming a more focussed direction in putting performance on the car.

    Q: Adrian, what is affecting Force India at the moment? It seems to be very much up and down. Sometimes you qualify and race really well and other times it doesn’t go so well.
    AS:
    I don’t think it is up and down to be honest. I am very consistent in the points and I think the only driver who has scored points in every race since Barcelona, so it is a very consistent team and good performance of the car. Sometimes it is very close to go into Q3, sometimes it is enough but it is just a very close competition to go into Q3. Williams did a little upgrade on their cars and they are much stronger. Also Sauber did a good step forward. We are not struggling, no. We have to optimise everything a little bit better. We lost out in qualifying in the last two races in my opinion as we could not use our tyres in the best way. But there are all reasons behind that and everything is going well and we should be able here to get another good result, another good points’ finish. The car is strong enough.

    Q: Michael, do you feel you are being unfairly treated by the media who are perhaps expecting too much from you or are you perfectly happy with your own performance?
    MS:
    No, perfectly happy with my own performance is probably wrong to say. But put it this way. Yes, there is an expectation out there which I think you have to be realistic that it is impossible to meet. I am away three years and just to come back and start exactly where I finished with maybe a car that doesn’t allow me to right now is probably unrealistic. I am not a magician either. It just needs time. I take that time. I enjoy most of all this process. There were some set-backs and moments where you would, obviously, be a little bit angry. But, in general, that is what it is about. There are ups and downs and that is the excitement of motor sport. I know the final target where I want to go and I am very confident I can achieve this. That is what I am working for and what I am focussing on. There is the sportive side and there is the entertainment side of this whole circus. You just have to accept and see it is just part of that situation and do not bother too much about it.

    QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR
    Q: (Walter Koster – Saarbrücker Zeitung) Mark, did you already have in the past such a situation like in this season with another team principal or team-mate?
    MW:
    Frank (Williams) and Patrick (Head) were sometimes not that easy but look it is normal. It was a situation that happened which was very unusual. As I said already, I don’t have any problems with Sebastian. What happened at Silverstone was nothing of Sebastian’s doing. I had some discussions with Christian (Horner) over the weekend. He is running the team and we learn and we go forward. There is always unexpected things throughout any driver’s career. As Michael just said there are new challengers for him right now and lots of little hurdles along the way. You are dreaming if you think it is always going to be straight up.

    Q: (Tobias Holtkamp – Bild) Michael, which of the two guys sitting next to you will be World Champion at the end of this season? Who are you crossing your fingers for?
    MS:
    First of all, it’s obviously clear that both of the guys to the left and right of me have a very good package and a very good possibility to fight and win the championship, but you probably don’t have to forget the McLaren drivers, that they’re still in the picture. I don’t think it’s finished yet, but naturally you sort of get the feelings of your national heart coming up and therefore you sort of have a German tendency. I’m sorry Mark but I guess that’s normal.

    Q: (Marc Surer – Sky Deutschland) Michael, I know your car is very sensitive on compounds. Here we have the softest and hardest of Bridgestone’s compounds. Does that worry you?
    MS:
    No, not really. I think we actually have much more of a problem with inconsistent behaviour on the same compound. As a clear example, again in some of the races, I go out with the same tyre and suddenly I’m half a second quicker or half a second slower and I’ve done nothing differently, but the result is there and it’s not happened only to us, it’s happening up and down the pit lane every so often and it’s a little bit difficult to understand.

    Q: (Udo Döring – Darmstädter Echo) Sebastian, during the days after Heppenheim, has it kind of been like being on cloud number nine with this great support in your home town? And yesterday, you couldn’t play soccer; was it a serious injury?
    SV:
    It’s nothing. I can still walk but to play soccer or to play football would probably have been a bit too risky, so that’s why I had to cancel. I had a bit of an incident at the beginning of the week, nothing big, but it didn’t allow me to play football yesterday. Yeah, I was back home and obviously it settles down. First of all you need to understand what happened. It was a very special day, the Sunday, and as I said, a lot of people – I’ve never seen it that busy there. All in all, it was just a fantastic day. We started off very early in the morning in the old town, the old party of the city. It takes a while to settle, as I said. It might still be difficult to understand that so many people came to see us but it was a very, very nice day.

    Q: (Jonathan Legard – BBC Sport) Michael, as someone who is well versed in winning championships, what are the ingredients that are needed to win a championship, particularly when you are opposing your team-mate, who is very challenging? What factors are there which are crucial to winning a title?
    MS:
    I don’t think I can give the answer you’re looking for in mentioning one particular part, because it’s like a detailed or small piece or puzzle of the big picture. You have to have all those little bits together to finally do it.

    Q: (Jonathan Legard – BBC Sport) You talked how you were still very confident in yourself about achieving what you want to do. Has that confidence been knocked at all, because it’s taken you longer than you thought it might have done to achieve something in your first year back?
    MS:
    Naturally you wish to go straight ahead with this, thinking, before I was finally able to drive the car, where we’d been last year with the team. You sort of think that there might be a possibility to continue on from there, but then it’s easy and clear enough to understand why that is and was not possible. That’s about it. You just understand and realise the situation and work from there on.

    Q: (Alan Baldwin – Reuters) Sebastian, sorry if I’ve missed something but perhaps you could just clarify this incident with your leg that you had at the beginning of the week?
    SV:
    I fell down when I was running. Nothing special but I had a bit of a hyper-extension of the muscle on the leg, nothing big. I can walk, it’s not a disaster.

    Q: (Gary Chappell – The Daily Express) Mark, ‘not bad for a number two driver’. You’re above Sebastian in the standings now. Should you win on Sunday, what will be your cry over the team radio this time?
    MW:
    I think it would be like it normally is, it’s a great team effort. It was said in the heat of the moment at Silverstone and that’s what was said but we’re both treated very equally in the team and as I said at the time, I would never have continued in that situation. That’s why I am continuing, so technically the cars are to give both of us a really fair crack and I’m looking forward to trying to have that big problem on Sunday if I can, to work out what I might say.

    Q: (Byron Young – The Daily Mirror) Seb, I’m sure you’re not too young to have watched Michael win some of his World Championships. What did you learn from what you saw when you watched when he was competing and when he won World Championships?
    SV:
    Many things. I think from great champions there are always a lot of things you can learn, and also if you look outside the table of Formula One, if you look at others sports – tennis, golf – there are great players, great individuals. They’re probably all talented but then there are one or two popping out, like probably at the moment Roger Federer and Nadal in tennis. What did I learn from Michael? I think you just need to listen to what he says. Obviously in the past I was watching mainly, like he said even now. Obviously he himself knows best which situation he is in at the moment. Obviously there are a lot of expectations from the outside but it’s part of being a great champion, being wise enough to know what you have to focus on. As he said, there are always two worlds: one is the entertainment and one is the sporting side. I think we clearly understood that he is focussing more on the sporting side and trying to come back and win races again. I could give you many examples but I think that was the lesson of the last ten minutes, I guess.

    Q: (Gary Chappell – The Daily Express) Michael, how different is it for you now, coming back to your home race and not being the dominant driver and not actually being the dominant German driver?
    MS:
    It probably evolves into the same answer that I sort of mentioned before, because it is very clear that we are not in the position to come here and win the race, because as a package, we are not yet strong enough to do so. But, for us, we fight for our possibilities of results and if we could manage a podium, that would be a great and a fantastic result for us, for the fans, for our supporters, and that’s what we’re aiming for.

    Q: (Sarah Holt – BBC Sport) Michael, you spoke about your final target that you had in your mind. Can you categorically confirm that you will be driving for Mercedes in 2011, and in which case what is your final…
    MS:
    Yes!

    Q: (Sarah Holt – BBC Sport) And in which case what is your final target for that season?MS: For this or next season?

    Q: (Sarah Holt – BBC Sport) Next.
    MS:
    It’s what I mentioned the day that I officially publicised that I was rejoining Formula One and it is to win another title, that’s our aim, that’s what my focus is and that’s what I’m here for. Very clearly.

    Q: (Gary Chappell – The Daily Express) On that point, Norbert Haug says that next season you’re going out to win the title. You will be another year older. What will actually change then?
    MS:
    I don’t know of anything other than becoming even wiser.

    Q: (Byron Young – The Daily Mirror) I just wanted to ask Mark what the reception has been like here from the fans? Is there any sense that you’re the rival to their local hero?
    SV:
    No, I think it’s been a very good reception so far. I think motor sport here in Germany has a huge following. I think there’s a lot of guys who obviously followed Michael in his day, and now there’s fresh blood, fresh talent, more people on the grid because of what Michael achieved, so they have a better knowledge of the sport, I suppose. They know there’s a bit of bullshit here and there which comes with the sport, and I suppose they like to watch the racing unfold. I drove for Mercedes Benz here, I did a lot of testing here with the sports car, so I have a little bit of a feeling for the guys. Obviously I’m not German but in terms of I have a feeling for how they follow their motor sport, so it’s a good time for me to drive here, at that part of my career as well.

    Q: (Byron Young – The Daily Mirror) Mark, is there a psychological advantage to winning this race, beating Seb, assuming the two of you are at the front and battling for victory, is there a psychological advantage to winning this race?
    MW:
    Not all the drivers on the grid have the luxury of having a home race, so the guys here do. Obviously I have an Australian race, there’s the British Grand Prix. I think last year we all shared the victories around. I think Jenson won my race, I won his race, and Seb won someone else’s race, and I won Rubens’ race, so it was always moving around. It is a unique thing, obviously, to win your home race and of course it would be right up there with Sebastian’s highlights to try and do that, so it’s a slightly different event in many ways. Also, on the other side of the coin, it’s another 25 points, it’s a normal grand prix. It maybe has a little bit more emotion around it for the German drivers. It doesn’t mean anything more special to me to win here, so psychologically it doesn’t do anything for me, but for the home drivers it’s a nice place to win.

     

    Copyright. F 1 Reports.com 2010. All Rights Reserved

  • Questions and Answers With Fernando Alonso. 2010

    It would be easy for Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso to feel downhearted at the moment. After two trying races in Valencia and Silverstone, Alonso is currently fifth in the standings, 47 points adrift of leader Lewis Hamilton. But with the F10 responding well to its updates, the determined Spaniard has not given up hope of clinching the title…

    Q: Fernando, you have endured a tough couple of races. Is the title still within your grasp?
    Fernando Alonso: 
    I think it’s not too late, as there are nine races to go, with many points still on the table. We will try to do the maximum possible and take points more regularly. To leave Valencia and Silverstone with so few points didn’t show our real potential, and we are definitely in a better position than the championship standings suggests. 

    Q: In you experience, is it possible for a team to treat two drivers equally when they are fighting for the championship?
    FA: 
    It is possible. You just need to find the best way to manage the situation. 

    Q: Has this season been harder than you expected it to be?
    FA: 
    No, not harder but more or less what we expected. There is tough competition with Red Bull, McLaren and Mercedes. Renault was a surprise at many races too. We were talking all winter long that four teams would be winning races and fighting for the championship. And this is the case, with two Red Bulls, two McLarens, two Ferraris, one Mercedes and one Renault all fighting.

    Q: You have had some ups and downs during your career. How frustrated are you feeling?
    FA: 
    There have been some frustrating moments in the last two races. We had a good weekend in Valencia and left Valencia with four points. We had a very good weekend in Silverstone and ended the race with zero points. I am quite frustrated that I’ve not been able to stay out of trouble and avoid certain problems. But I am very confident that I am still able to fight for the championship, as the car has improved a lot. I’m very happy with the car now. I’m even more motivated and more confident than before. Sure the gap between me and the leader has increased, but the car is improving race by race and now there is the possibility to be on the podium regularly. I think we are very strong so I have more confidence now. 

    Q: Are there any updates on the car for this weekend’s race?
    FA: 
    Yes, there will be new developments on the car. Getting pole position or winning the race will be difficult as Red Bull still has an advantage, but we will work to close the gap so that we finally can fight with them. My prediction is that this weekend will be very tricky, as we will have a totally different tyre situation from what we have had all season long. So it will be more difficult to manage the balance of the car. There are many factors that will decide who wins this weekend. 

    Q: Did you think that Mercedes GP’s Michael Schumacher would be stronger than he is at the moment?
    FA: 
    I think we all expected more competition from Michael. It is true that Mercedes is performing as well as we all thought. They had some problems at some races, but even so Nico is doing a really good job and taking a lot of points. But it is only the first half of the season and I expect Michael to be stronger in the second half. I don’t think that Michael has any problems – he’s just adapting to the car. 

    Q: How angry were you in the car at Silverstone? You told your engineer not to talk to you anymore. Do you feel that the drive-through penalty was a fair punishment?
    FA: 
    In Silverstone I was not angry. The race was basically over. I was in P18 with 15 laps to go so there was no chance of recovering and therefore no reason to be angry. I had switched off from that race and had begun to think about Germany when I said that on the radio. I started to take care of the gearbox and the engine. There was nothing more to do. The penalties are always fair. They decide what they see and there’s nothing we can do. We just have to do better next time. This is in the past and hopefully here in Germany we’ll have a trouble-free weekend and take more points than at the previous races. 

    Q: Your missed opportunities at the last two races benefited others. To catch up in the standings do you need the others to miss opportunities, or can you do it on your own?
    FA: 
    I think we can do it our own. We just need to have consistent races. If we’d had a normal race in Valencia and a normal race in Silverstone, I wouldn’t be 47 points behind. I would probably be leading the championship now.

     

    Copyright. Formula 1.com.2010 All Rights Reserved

  • What Really Happened to Phoebe Prince?

    bull-e

     

    The untold story of her suicide and the role of the kids who have been criminally charged for it.

    By Emily Bazelon

    From: Emily Bazelon
    Subject: The Untold Story of Her Suicide and the Role of the Kids Who Have Been Criminally Charged for It

    Editor’s note: You may also download Parts 1-3 in PDF format here (320 kb).

    One week last October, Bill Evans, the assistant principal of South Hadley High School in Massachusetts, chose two students to read public service announcements over the loudspeaker as part of the school’s participation in National Bullying Prevention Awareness Week. In selecting kids to read the PSAs, Evans thought about who would be a spokesperson that other kids would believe was speaking sincerely. He chose Sean Mulveyhill, a senior and star of the football team. “He was a natural selection—the kind of kid who would seek out someone having difficulty just to help him,” Evans says.

    In his PSA, Sean laid out four steps that victims of cyberbullying can take: Don’t return nasty texts or IMs. Make copies of them. Set up filters to block the bully from sending more. Talk to a caring adult. Sean’s message ended: “Remember that when you are targeted by a person or group of people, whether online or face-to-face, you are not alone and you can take action to make it stop.”

    “Sean read it. I think he meant it,” Evans says.

    Six months later, Sean Mulveyhill became one of five South Hadley students facing serious criminal charges for bullying Phoebe Prince, a 15-year-old ninth grader who came to the town from Ireland in September and killed herself in January. (Sean and a sixth student, Austin Renaud, were also charged with statutory rape.) The charges turned the six students into international symbols of callow teenage evil. Their names and pictures appeared on the evening news and on the national morning shows. They were kicked out of school. Sean lost a football scholarship to college. They are all facing pretrial proceedings in September, with the possibility of prison time if they’re convicted.

    If you’ve read about the death of Phoebe Prince and its aftermath in People magazine or the Boston Globe or Boston Herald or the Irish Independent, or watched TV segments about the case, the image of Sean reading an anti-bullying message might seem like further evidence that bad kids were running the show at South Hadley High. But what if that’s wrong? What if Sean was in fact a strong kid who had looked out for weaker ones? What if there was no pack of untouchable mean girls ruling the halls of South Hadley High, as the Boston Globe column that kicked off national coverage of the case suggested?

    I’ve been reporting in South Hadley since February, as part of a series on cyberbullying. There is no question that some of the teenagers facing criminal charges treated Phoebe cruelly. But not all of them did. And it’s hard to see how any of the kids going to trial this fall ever could have anticipated the consequences of their actions, for Phoebe or for themselves. Should we send teenagers to prison for being nasty to one another? Is it really fair to lay the burden of Phoebe’s suicide on these kids?

    District Attorney Elizabeth Scheibel believes it is. The most serious charge against five of the teenagers—Sean, Ashley Longe, Kayla Narey, Sharon Chanon Velazquez, and Flannery Mullins—is civil rights violation with bodily injury. Defense lawyers expect Scheibel to argue that Phoebe’s civil rights were violated because she was called an “Irish slut”—a denigration of her national origin—and because the bullying interfered with her right to an education. The bodily injury, the defense lawyers say, is Phoebe’s death by suicide. The maximum penalty for this charge is 10 years in prison. The teens are also charged with other crimes, including criminal harassment and stalking. All six teens have pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

     

    My investigation into the events that gave rise to Phoebe’s death, based on extensive interviews and review of law enforcement records, reveals the uncomfortable fact that Phoebe helped set in motion the conflicts with other students that ended in them turning on her. Her death was tragic, and she shouldn’t have been bullied. But she was deeply troubled long before she ever met the six defendants. And her own behavior made other students understandably upset.

    I’ve wrestled with how much of this information to publish. Phoebe’s family has suffered terribly. But when the D.A. charged kids with causing Phoebe’s death and threatened them with prison, she invited an inquiry into other potential causes. The whole story is a lot more complicated than anyone has publicly allowed for. The events that led to Phoebe’s death show how hard it is for kids, parents, and schools to cope with bullying, especially when the victim is psychologically vulnerable. The charges against the students show how strong the impulse is to point fingers after a suicide, how hard it is to assess blame fairly, and how ill-suited police and prosecutors can be to punishing bullies.

    Phoebe Prince moved to South Hadley last fall from a tiny seaside hamlet in County Clare, Ireland, where she’d lived since she was 2. South Hadley, a town of 17,000, has a sizable Irish population. It is home to Mt. Holyoke College, and Hampshire, Smith, and UMass are all nearby. But the academics tend to live in Amherst and Northampton. The parents in South Hadley are more likely to own their own businesses or work as nurses or teachers or cops. The town has a median income of about $77,000 and is 94 percent white.

    Phoebe came to South Hadley with her mother, who is a secondary school teacher, and her then-12-year-old sister. Phoebe’s parents were separating; her father, a writer who’d gone into advertising, stayed behind. Phoebe missed him. In an essay for English class written in October, you can feel her longing for her father: “I curl up on a chair adjacent from my father making sure to be cosily tucked in near the fire. He puts down his book and says, ‘Now what is on your mind tonight my dear?’ … No subject is off limits with me and my father.”

    Last fall, Phoebe went to the school library to find Dante’s Inferno for a school report. When the librarian apologized for having only an old, inaccessible translation, Phoebe said her father could help her because he knew Latin and some Italian. But when she wrote about a book for English in October, she chose not a classic but Cutting: Understanding and Overcoming Self-Mutilation, by the lecturer and psychotherapist Steven Levenkron. In her essay, she wrestled with the discussion of emotional pain in the book: “From a personal point of view I can see that Levenkron does truly understand the concept of self mutilation and how it’s not about suicide in most cases it’s about trying to transfer the pain from emotional to physical pain which is a lot easier to deal with for most adolescents who most likely don’t even understand how they’re feeling.”

    Phoebe’s mother, Anne O’Brien, told the police that her daughter started cutting herself in 2008, while she was at a private Irish boarding school. A close friend of Phoebe’s in Ireland told the police that she and Phoebe both had trouble with other girls because they were dating older boys. “Phoebe said she couldn’t take the other girls … at her every night,” O’Brien told the police. “Phoebe was the type of kid who would never fight back.”

    When Phoebe’s parents learned about the cutting, they pulled Phoebe out of boarding school and enrolled her locally at Mary Immaculate Secondary School, where O’Brien taught, according to the Irish Independent. There, too, Phoebe had a falling out with a girl over a boy. “Eventually it got so bad that Phoebe went through three or four months where none of the girls would talk to her,” her mother said. By February 2009, Phoebe was cutting herself again, and in May she started taking Prozac, O’Brien told the police. (I tried to reach Phoebe’s parents through a family friend and through their lawyers. One of the lawyers, Robert Leonard, called me back and said: “I would like to make clear our opposition to the publication of any non-public information concerning the decedent,” meaning Phoebe.)

    In South Hadley, Phoebe got a new start. Kids liked her. “She was really easy to make friends with, very sociable,” a boy who was a ninth grader last year told me. “She hung out with whoever she wanted right away.” She also thrived academically. “I thought I had my old Phoebe back,” O’Brien told the police. “She was talking and participating and writing. She was excited that in this country you could talk and express yourself in class.”

    The narrative that’s emerged since Phoebe’s death is that because she was new to the school and popular with boys, a pack of jealous, predatory kids—”the South Hadley Six“—went after her en masse. But that’s not the story the police interviews tell, and it’s not how many of the students I talked to see it. Even kids who are relieved that Phoebe’s death has pushed the school to do more to prevent bullying don’t recognize the storyline that took hold in the media. “I’m upset and angry that bullying wasn’t taken more seriously here before this,” says Nina, almost 16, who was taunted for being a “poseur” by a group of girls in middle school. (I have changed the names of kids who talked to me but have not already been identified in the press.) But Phoebe’s death “has been turned into this Lifetime movie plot. It’s so unlike what actually happened.”

    What actually happened, in the eyes of many of the students I’ve talked to, is that Phoebe got into separate conflicts with different kids. That doesn’t excuse the other kids’ bad behavior in response to Phoebe’s actions. But it was one source of the trouble. Social scientists generally define bullying as repeated acts of abuse that involve a power imbalance. Is that what happened to Phoebe? “In the end you can call it bullying,” says one adult at the school. “But to the other kids, Phoebe was the one with the power. She was attracting guys away from relationships.” (Because of the hyper-publicity surrounding this case, I was able to talk to staff at the school only on condition of anonymity.)

    The problems with other kids in South Hadley started around November. By then, Phoebe had met Sean Mulveyhill, now 18, who would give her rides to school. Sean was drawn to Phoebe. “I think Phoebe appealed to Sean because she seemed to gravitate toward deep conversations—let’s talk about life,” another adult at the school says. But Sean had previously dated 17-year-old Kayla Narey, a field hockey player who’d lost her father, a master plumber, two years earlier. Sean and Kayla were talking about getting back together. “It was a complicated thing,” Sean told the police in late January. “Kayla and I were talking, but we weren’t dating, I also was not dating Phoebe, but we were friends” who were intimately involved. In a statement that’s typical of the positions the accused students’ lawyers have taken publically, Colin Keefe, defense counsel for Ashley, said in April: “When all the details become known, I am certain that my client will be cleared of these charges.”)

    Around the same time, O’Brien was letting Phoebe spend one night a week alone in their small apartment, while she and her younger daughter went to her sister’s house in Springfield. After one weekend, O’Brien found out from a neighbor about a party Phoebe had hosted while she was away. Phoebe admitted that some of the kids brought alcohol and were smoking pot. She said she had smoked hash. The police were called, some kids said in their police interviews after her death. O’Brien said she stopped letting Phoebe stay alone after that.

    Also in November, O’Brien renewed Phoebe’s prescription for Prozac and took her to be evaluated at Cooley Dickinson Hospital in Northampton, where a doctor prescribed Seroquel. The drug is used to treat mood disorders. A week or so later, Sean tried to break off his relationship with Phoebe. On the Friday after Thanksgiving, he drove to her house and they talked in her garage. Afterward Phoebe came into the living room and told her mother she’d swallowed the bottle of Seroquel. O’Brien drove her to Cooley Dickinson Hospital in Northampton, talking to her daughter to keep her awake. Phoebe was hospitalized for the next week. A counselor at the school told the police she had gone into organ failure (which, according to psychiatrists I talked to, suggests she might have also overdosed on a medication like Tylenol).

    In the beginning of December, Sean and Kayla started dating exclusively. About a week later, Phoebe came up to Kayla in school. She said that she knew Sean had told Kayla that he and Phoebe had had sex, and she was sorry. But Kayla hadn’t known. She texted a breakup message to Sean. But she didn’t turn on Phoebe at this point. “I thought it was brave of Phoebe to tell me that, seeing that she was new to the school and a freshman,” Kayla told the police.

    Sean and Kayla soon got back together, but Sean was angry with Phoebe; he thought she’d tried to derail his relationship. When Phoebe came up to him in the hallway, he turned around and walked the other way. After that, he stopped talking to her.

    In December, Phoebe became interested in another senior football player, 18-year-old Austin Renaud. His father had died suddenly a few years earlier, and that made him a good listener for Phoebe. “Austin was sensitive to Phoebe being depressed,” says Christine, now 18, a friend of Sean’s and Austin’s. “She talked to him about it. They had a short-lived relationship and after that they were still friends.” Austin told the police that he and Phoebe didn’t have sex, but that she talked to him about her November suicide attempt. “She told me about her problems,” he said. “She said she missed her father.”

    The problem with Phoebe’s involvement with Austin was that he had a serious girlfriend—Flannery Mullins, now 17. Flannery mattered a great deal to Austin, students and adults say. “Austin was an angry kid for a long time,” one of the adults at the school says. “But he had really come a long way. He was poised to get his diploma at the end of the summer. This thing with Phoebe, it appeared to throw him. Because he seemed really committed to Flannery. She was pretty well grounded and she had good connections in school with other adults. I think she was good for Austin.”

    One night in early January, Flannery made an apparent reference to Phoebe on her Facebook page. In an exchange with another girl who brought up an event they’d both attended, Flannery replied, “Hahaha best night of my life :) ya we kick it with the true irish not the gross slutter poser ones :) .” A third girl asked if she counted as cute and Irish, and a fourth one chimed in “like meeee :) .” Flannery answered, “Yes I love you … I think you no who im talking about :) .” A couple of girls replied with a chorus of “hahas.”

    There is one corroborated eyewitness account of Flannery and Phoebe directly interacting. A friend of Phoebe’s said that one day after the tension started over Austin, she asked Flannery not to go into a school bathroom because Phoebe was in there. Flannery went in anyway. (Other students said they saw this too.) The friend followed. Flannery was standing by the sink. Phoebe walked out of the stall without making eye contact. Flannery didn’t say anything to her. The girls left the bathroom separately, Phoebe’s friend said. (Other girls who implicated Flannery to the police give secondhand descriptions of alleged incidents that they didn’t see. A couple of these girls had themselves called Phoebe names on Facebook and Twitter, according to the police interviews.) “It doesn’t appear that Flannery said anything to Phoebe in the bathroom,” Flannery’s lawyer, Alfred Chamberland, told me. “Everything Flannery was alleged to have said was never directly to Phoebe.”

    On Jan. 7, a gym teacher overheard Flannery venting about Phoebe during class in a way that made him think a fight was looming. The teacher told Bill Evans, the assistant principal, who, according to his interview with the police, talked to both Phoebe and Flannery, giving Flannery a verbal warning and counseling both girls to stay away from each other. After that, according to the school, Flannery steered clear of Phoebe. Nothing in the police records suggests otherwise. And yet Flannery is facing the same serious charges for bullying as the other kids.

    Austin, for his part, isn’t accused of bullying Phoebe—but the statutory rape charge he and Sean face carries a maximum three-year prison sentence. In Massachusetts the age of consent is 16. The state rarely charges 17- and 18-year-olds like Austin and Sean for having sex with a 15-year-old like Phoebe. But this time, Scheibel did just that. Why is Austin facing a statutory rape charge if he denies having had sex with her? I tried to ask Scheibel this question, but she didn’t call me back. One of her deputies, Elizabeth Dunphy-Farris, said,I’m not going to comment on any specific evidence. It’s a pending investigation.”

    After Christmas break, Phoebe’s problems at school worsened. On Jan. 6, Sharon Chanon Velazquez, now 17, who was in Flannery’s chemistry class and saw Flannery as a friend, called Phoebe a “whore” in the cafeteria and “told her to stay away from ‘people’s men,’ ” according to student witnesses who spoke to the police. A few minutes later, before the bell rang for class, Sharon walked into a classroom where Phoebe was sitting and loudly berated her again. The teacher, who was sitting across the room, told the police she couldn’t hear exactly what Sharon said, but saw that Phoebe was upset. She comforted Phoebe and reported Sharon, who received a two-day suspension. After Sharon was indicted, her mother, Angeles Chanon, told the Boston Herald of her daughter’s interaction with Phoebe: “She exchanged a couple of words with her. “My daughter never fought with her or said, ‘Go harm yourself,’ or ‘I hate you.’ “

    Sharon’s behavior and the school’s reaction shows that while publicly calling out a girl as a slut wasn’t condoned at South Hadley High, it wasn’t entirely beyond the pale either. A few of the kids the police interviewed reported similar incidents of kids “flipping out” on one another. One 18-year-old said she heard Kayla privately call Phoebe a “whore who wanted attention.” “I didn’t take what Kayla said that seriously because girls in my school get in ‘bitch fights’ all the time,” she told the police.  new  ‘This might help explain a question that has plagued South Hadley since Phoebe’s death: Why didn’t other kids step in to protect her? None of the kids interviewed by the police reported what they saw to school administrators. Only one boy said he stuck up for Phoebe, by telling Sharon to stop insulting her.

    One tenth grader told me about listening in class as Ashley Longe talked about going up to Phoebe to yell at her. (Phoebe wasn’t there.) “And everyone in the class was like, ‘Good idea.’ Or else we just sat there,” the girl remembered. “No one said, ‘Why?’ or ‘Don’t do that.’ It’s so much harder to stand up for someone when you’re actually in the situation than when you think about it afterward. Especially if you’re not even good friends with them.” This is a notoriously vexing aspect of bullying: Research has long shown that bystanders rarely stand up to bullies or report them to adults. Some bullying prevention programs nod to realism by urging kids to walk away rather than stop a bully—at least that way you deprive the bully of an audience.’

    Though Flannery and Sharon stayed away from Phoebe after the first week of January, the conflict with Kayla, Sean, and a friend of Sean’s, 17-year-old Ashley Longe, flared up again. Around Jan. 11 or 12, according to several students, Kayla wrote something on Facebook to the effect of: Know what I hate? Irish sluts. At this point, Phoebe was spending a lot of time with a third senior boy. He showed her Kayla’s post, and he told the police that Phoebe responded to it, using his Facebook account, because she didn’t have one. The post read something like you shouldn’t say that; you don’t know her.

    Phoebe also showed this boy her cuts. “She lifted up her hoodie and showed cuts on her chest above her bra and all the way down to her hips,” he told the police. “I really didn’t look too long. I found it to be very painful. This was someone I cared about and she was harming herself. Phoebe asked for help healing them. I told her to use Neosporin but I wasn’t too sure.” Phoebe had chosen a confidant who didn’t really know how to help her.

    On Jan. 14, Phoebe came to school with a mark on her upper chest, visible above her shirt. She went to see the nurse and told her that she’d been smoking pot a few days earlier, and had dropped a hot pipe on her chest. The nurse didn’t think Phoebe’s story matched the mark, and she called Sally Watson-Menkel, a licensed social worker and the school adjustment counselor (she worked in the special education department but was available to other students with problems). Watson-Menkel had been in regular contact with Phoebe and her mother since the middle of November, she told the police, and she didn’t believe Phoebe’s story either. They talked about how to cover the mark for the school cotillion, which was two days away. Watson-Menkel told Phoebe they had to call her mother. “Phoebe said she was doing well and had made up her work and if I called her mom, she might not be able to go to Ireland”—an upcoming trip that was planned. When she and Watson-Menkel called O’Brien, Phoebe told her mother the story about the pipe and the pot and asked if they could talk more about it when she got home. (Watson-Menkel declined to comment for this article.)

    But Phoebe didn’t speak to her mother again. When school got out at 2 p.m., she was subjected to a series of taunts from Sean, Kayla, and Ashley. This is the worst behavior described in the police interviews. It came entirely from three kids, not six—on this point, the D.A., students, and administrators agree.

    Phoebe went to the library during lunch. She sat with a girl she was friends with and a senior boy who was helping her with math. At another table were Sean, Kayla, and Ashley. One of them wrote “Irish bitch is a Cunt” next to Phoebe’s name in the library sign-up sheet. According to several students Ashley yelled “whore” at Phoebe and “close your legs” and “I hate stupid sluts.”   ‘Ashley had a reputation at school for making trouble, according to students I talked to: She’d walked by other girls in the halls and hissed “slut” or “whore” at them for dating a boy that a friend of hers liked. She was well-known to administrators. South Hadley staff members say they had worked hard to convince Ashley that she could be the first person in her family to go to college. But she was always getting pulled into someone else’s drama.At the end of the school day, Phoebe encountered Sean, Kayla, and Ashley again outside the auditorium on her way to the parking lot. According to student witnesses, Sean said, “Here she comes,” and then Ashley called Phoebe a whore. Sean and Kayla laughed. A few minutes later, as Phoebe walked home, Ashley drove by her in a friend’s car, yelled “whore” out the window, and threw an empty drink can at her. Phoebe cried as she kept walking.

    About two hours before she died, Phoebe texted with the boy she’d sat with that day in the library. In one of several messages that speak to her feelings of desperation, she wrote: “I cant do it anymore … im literally hme cryn, my scar on my chest is potentially permanent, my bodies fukd up wht mre du they want frm me? Du I hav to fukn od!” The boy wrote back, reassuring her that he would talk to Sean and Ashley and make them stop. “Who cares what other people think phoebe I know you’re a good person,” he wrote.

    At home in her bedroom, Phoebe plugged in her cell phone to recharge it, perhaps because she hadn’t entirely absorbed what she was about to do. Soon after, she hung herself in the stairwell with a black scarf woven with multicolor thread. Her sister had given it to her. After Phoebe’s death, the police found several of her drawings. One of them shows a human figure with a noose around the neck. In a note drawn as if it was pinned to the body, Phoebe asked for forgiveness.

    Click to launch a slide show about Phoebe Prince.

    Coming up in Part 2: The Phoebe Prince case isn’t the first in which District Attorney Elizabeth Scheibel may have stretched the law. A close look at her record as D.A.

    Like Slate and Bull-E on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

  • Rome Fiddles, We Burn

    Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

    Maureen Dowd

     

    July 16, 2010

    Rome Fiddles, We Burn

    If the Vatican is trying to restore the impression that its moral sense is intact, issuing a document that equates pedophilia with the ordination of women doesn’t really do that.

    The Catholic Church continued to heap insult upon injury when it revealed its long-awaited new rules on clergy sex abuse, rules that the Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said signaled a commitment to grasp the nettle with “rigor and transparency.”

    The church still believes in its own intrinsic holiness despite all evidence to the contrary. It thinks it’s making huge concessions on the unstoppable abuse scandal when it’s taking baby steps.

    The casuistic document did not issue a zero-tolerance policy to defrock priests after they are found guilty of pedophilia; it did not order bishops to report every instance of abuse to the police; it did not set up sanctions on bishops who sweep abuse under the rectory rug; it did not eliminate the statute of limitations for abused children; it did not tell bishops to stop lobbying legislatures to prevent child-abuse laws from being toughened.

    There is no moral awakening here. The cruelty and indecency of child abuse once more inspires tactical contrition. All the penitence of the church is grudging and reactive. Church leaders are merely as penitent as they need to be to protect the institution.

    Can you imagine such a scene in the confessional?

    “Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. I am as sorry as my job or school requires me to be.”

    “But my daughter, that is not true penitence. That’s situational penitence.”

    After the Belgian police bracingly conducted raids on the church hierarchy, inspired in part by the horrifying case of a boy molested for years by his uncle, the bishop of Bruges, a case that the church ignored and covered up for 25 years, the pope did not applaud the more aggressive tack. He condemned it.

    In a remarkable Times story recently, Laurie Goodstein and David Halbfinger debunked the spin that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger had been one of the more alert officials on the issue of sexual abuse:

    “The future pope, it is now clear, was also part of a culture of nonresponsibility, denial, legalistic foot-dragging and outright obstruction. More than any top Vatican official other than John Paul, it was Cardinal Ratzinger who might have taken decisive action in the 1990s to prevent the scandal from metastasizing in country after country, growing to such proportions that it now threatens to consume his own papacy.”

    If Roman Polanski were a priest, he’d still be working here.

    Stupefyingly, the new Vatican document also links raping children with ordaining women as priests, deeming both “graviora delicta,” or grave offenses. Clerics who attempt to ordain women can now be defrocked.

    On Beliefnet, Mark Silk, a professor of religion at Connecticut’s Trinity College, suggested that the stronger threat against women’s ordination is not “a maladroit add-on” but the medieval Vatican’s “main business.”

    After the Vatican launched two inquisitions of American nuns, it didn’t seem possible that the archconservative Il Papa and his paternalistic redoubt could get more unenlightened, but they have somehow managed it.

    Letting women be priests — which should be seen as a way to help cleanse the church and move it beyond its infantilized and defensive state — is now on the list of awful sins right next to pedophilia, heresy, apostasy and schism.

    Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, the chairman of the Committee on Doctrine of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, asserted, “The Catholic Church, through its long and constant teaching, holds that ordination has been, from the beginning, reserved to men, a fact which cannot be changed despite changing times.”

    But if it was reserved to celibate men centuries ago simply as a way for the church to keep land, why can’t it be changed? If a society makes strides in not subordinating women, why can’t the church reflect that? If men prove that all-male hierarchies can get shamefully warped, why can’t they embrace the normality of equality? The Vatican’s insistence on male prerogative is misogynistic poppycock — enhancing American Catholics’ disenchantment with Rome.

    In The New Republic, Garry Wills wrote about his struggle to come to terms with the sins of his church: Jesus “is the one who said, ‘Whatever you did to any of my brothers, even the lowliest, you did to me.’ That means that the priests abusing the vulnerable young were doing that to Jesus, raping Jesus. Any clerical functionary who shows more sympathy for the predator priests than for their victims instantly disqualified himself as a follower of Jesus. The cardinals said they must care for their own, going to jail if necessary to protect a priest. We say the same thing, but the ‘our own’ we care for are the victimized, the poor, the violated. They are Jesus.”


    Copyright. New York Times Compant. 2010. All Rights Reserved

  • The Art of Social Discourse

    …Be More Charming

    charming Photo credit: Lou Brooks

    It doesn’t matter what you do for a living; it’s all sales. It’s making people feel good about doing business with you, whether business means a cup of coffee, a bite to eat, and a half hour of talk or a night of stolen, steamy bliss. Calling it charm just makes it sound sexy; hell, talking about it at all makes it sound dishonest. It’s not. It’s human nature at its most natural.

    You meet me. My voice is firm and sunny. I’m smiling. A smile is a primal thing, mighty past words. What it comes down to is simple: You have to trust your stuff. I have my flaws — plenty of ‘em. But just take a gander at the dark sea of mopery that passes for competition: I’m a godling by comparison, and so are you.

    The first thing I’m going to say is, “Thanks for making time for me.” Doesn’t matter if you’re Sean Penn or a taxi driver, you don’t owe me squat. We’re going to share a few moments; the only lives we’re ever going to live have joined right here and now. You made that happen; I owe you. Let’s have some fun. The next thing I’m going to do is ask about you. I’m going to learn about you, and I’m going to learn from you. I’m going to make you feel important; because we’re together, you are important. Then comes the coup de grâce: I’m going to make you laugh. I don’t know how to tell you to do this; you must trust your instincts. Genuine laughter is no less than a social orgasm. Provoke it and the world will drop its drawers for you.

    These aren’t tricks. The only trick is that there are no tricks, just a planet full of folks — rich and poor alike — all hoping to get treated better than dirt. I can give them that gift. You can, too



    Read more: http://www.esquire.com/features/impossible/self-improvements-guide/how-to-be-charming-to-women-0810#ixzz0uQeiwvR3