Month: February 2007

  • Image:CouchSurfing.gif

    Sleeping with Strangers

    Technology

    27 votes

    Casey Fenton wants to change this. He founded CouchSurfing in 2004 to connect travelers with places to crash—not in hostels, but in people's homes, a notion that many no doubt find bizarre. Unlike other online networks, CouchSurfing allows its users to find one another online in order to meet and host each other offline. That alone is something of a radical concept (it's easy to imagine the collective panic of loved ones everywhere: "You're going to stay with strangers?"). But there is a deeper purpose behind the site, says Fenton. Fenton calls himself, only half in jest, a scientist of human connection. His mission is to transform people's lives. "We want to create memorable, intense experiences," he says, "to put the right people together in the right situation at the right time. This isn't just about a place to crash."

    I met Fenton for the first time a year ago, when CouchSurfing was still in its relative infancy, with 20,000 members (it now has more than 125,000, and at its current rate of growth could reach a half million in a year). Word of the website was just beginning to spread, and about Fenton there was only rumor and conjecture. Fellow CouchSurfers seemed to revere him as a kind of furtive cult hero: a gypsy king of wanderers. Before our rendezvous at a side-street bar in San Francisco's Mission district, I imagined him as a bohemian savant, wild-eyed and bedraggled. But he arrived in a button-down shirt and blue jeans, clean-shaven, carrying a notebook with the word "Life" etched on the cover. From across the room, the bartender gave his youthful face a long, appraising look. Smiling, Fenton dipped his slight frame into a corner booth. It was late afternoon and the bar was quiet. Still, it was hard to hear him; he speaks in a surprisingly faint voice, but his gestures have an excitable energy. He shifts a lot. The story of CouchSurfing, he said, began six years ago.

    Fenton, then 22, was already harried, a software programmer in New Hampshire working 100-hour weeks for a headhunting dot-com he himself had founded. He was struggling to keep the company afloat, and spending endless hours staring into a monitor, programming code. Eager for a break, and with only a weekend to spare, he found a cheap last-minute ticket to Iceland. The flight left in four days. Fenton didn't know a soul in Reykjavik. "I tried to imagine myself there," he said. "What am I going to do in Iceland? I pictured myself walking down freezing streets, alone. I didn't want the empty feeling of staying in a hotel or hostel, but I was a shy person and I didn't know how to connect with people." So he did what any reasonably competent, ethically flexible programmer might do: he hacked into the University of Iceland student directory and spammed 1,500 students. "Basically I said, 'I'm coming on Friday. I want to see the real Iceland. Will you show me your country?'" He received more than 50 replies. Fenton spent one of the best weekends of his life gallivanting through Reykjavik, sleeping in someone's garage, staying up late into the half-light of the arctic night, and making friends that he has kept to this day.

    For a shy kid from the White Mountains of New Hampshire, raised by hippies in a cabin a mile from the nearest road, it was as if the world had, in three days, laid bare its secrets. "I got back on the plane on Monday morning and said to myself, 'I need to travel like this all the time.'" When the flight landed in Boston five hours later, Fenton had already begun to conceive of CouchSurfing. The next four years would take him to other jobs, and to Alaska, where he got involved in state politics—he managed internet strategy for Tony Knowles's unsuccessful 2004 senate campaign—but throughout that time he always held on to the idea of the site, programming lines of code while riding on campaign buses. Finally, in January of 2004, while Fenton was living in Juneau, CouchSurfing went live.

    That same month, 3,500 miles to the south, Jim Stone, presently the world's foremost CouchSurfer, had an epiphany. He says this as we rumble down the boulevards of Montreal in his silver Nissan pickup. Stone, 29, an affable, broad-shouldered Texan, has been staying with the Collective for over a month, serving as a kind of right-hand man to Fenton (they became friends through the site). He's not a computer programmer but he helps with errands and makes money for himself on the side by taking on small Craigslist moving jobs with his truck. As he hunches over the steering wheel, searching street signs for a road that doesn't seem to exist, he describes the moment, two years ago, when his life changed.

    Stone was then living in Denton, a college town in north Texas, stuck in a sales job he hated. "All my friends had left," he says. "I was getting apathetic. I could see another five years going by just the same way. I remember checking my mail one day, and the postmark on the letters was the same day I had graduated two years earlier. Two years gone, just like that. And I freaked out."

    He quit his job, packed his belongings, and split town, staying first with his father in west Texas. When he discovered CouchSurfing a month later, he signed on as the 99th member. He has since become, by all accounts, its most well-traveled participant. In the two years since he left Texas he has stayed in over 120 homes throughout Europe, New Zealand, the east coast of Australia, and most of the United States. He has "CouchSurfed" with a former soap opera star in Paris and with a couple celebrating their 50th wedding anniversary in Denmark. He has lived for weeks with an Italian family in a villa outside of Naples. Like other members of the Collective, Stone seems to travel in bursts, stopping somewhere long enough to save a little money and then stretching it for as long as he can on the road. Four months in Europe cost him $3,000, a number he now shakes his head at. "I could do it for a lot less today," he says.

    Stone pulls the truck back onto the highway, having given up on finding the street he's looking for. He sighs and shoves his bangs away from his eyes, exasperated by the traffic. I ask him what he's learned in all of his wandering (his business card actually reads "Vagabond"), and we drive along in silence as he ponders an answer. "I let the people choose my destination," he says at last. "That's what I've learned. I'll travel to some small little town in Austria that I've never heard of if I find someone who sounds interesting living there." Stone says that the intimacy of staying with strangers has changed him.

    This narrative of transformation is common among CouchSurfers. I've heard variations on it from a dozen different people. It seems to go like this: Being welcomed into someone's home, perhaps the most private place in which to meet, creates instant, deep connection and lasting friendship. In having to tell our own story to others, over and over again, we come to realize certain truths about ourselves. If we are shy, we begin to talk more. If we are brash, we begin to listen. And by witnessing other lives, we open to possibilities that we were once blind to. Alex Goodman, 23, a member of the Collective who, as it happens, is also a sociologist studying the group, said this: "If I were 16 and in search of answers for how to live my life, I wouldn't go to a rabbi or a priest or a Buddhist monk. I'd try to find a way to systematically evaluate the experiences of everyone around me, to see what has worked and what hasn't, what makes for a good, happy, worthwhile life and what doesn't. Information technology and the emergence of social networks are making this possible."

    The reach of CouchSurfing, after only two years of operation, is impressive. There are people, at this moment, offering their homes through the site in Iran and Turkey, in Malaysia and Venezuela and Nepal. The site has enabled a kind of spontaneous, footloose exploration of the world, and the numbers speak to this: 40,000 homes visited, 17,000 cities represented, 125,000 members participating, and several thousand more joining each week. It brings to mind the vision that Jack Kerouac heralded a half-century ago in Dharma Bums: "A great rucksack revolution, thousands or even millions of young Americans wandering around with rucksacks, going up to mountains to pray, making children laugh and old men glad, making young girls happy and old girls happier."

    But as with any community, there are problems, and the problems facing CouchSurfing are of a serious sort. To begin with, how do you create trust between people who've never met? In this country, the very idea of opening your home to a stranger is anathema to most people—perhaps for good reason. Fenton, for his part, says we need to broaden the meaning of being someone's "friend" online. While most social networks are content with a single indicator of friendship—you're either a friend or you're not—CouchSurfing asks for much more information when someone seeks to be your friend on the site. Have you met in person? How would you rate your friendship? Have you stayed with one another? When did you meet? What was the quality of your experience? The site encourages members to be unsparingly honest in their evaluations, and the testimonies can't be edited or erased.

    Certainly, negative comments can be found ("He is a stickler for rules and seems to have an irrational fear of authority"), but for the most part testimonies tend to be of the unflaggingly positive sort. Jessica, for instance, a 22-year-old American, writes of Daniele, who hosted her in Rome: "He deserves some sort of award for hosting. My friend and I stayed with him a record of 40 days. We became a true family and I will never forget his kindness and generosity. CouchSurfing gave me the experience of a lifetime. It forever changed me!" Invariably, people would rather say nothing than say something negative, and that etiquette stands in the way of reliable feedback.

    There is a real sense, too, the bigger CouchSurfing gets and the less self-selecting it becomes, the greater the dangers that confront it. For anyone bent on doing harm, the site affords access to a world of trusting souls. The "axe murderer" scenario, however unlikely, is one Fenton ruefully acknowledges he can do little about. "This is a slice of the real world," he says. "So, yes, anything can happen. We ask people to use all the safety features of the site and to take every possible precaution. We've been fortunate that nothing bad has happened." These precautions—be careful when choosing a single male host, consider meeting for coffee first, be prepared to leave at the first sign of a problem—are certainly well-intentioned. But there are women traveling alone using CouchSurfing and some of them are young, in their late teens or early twenties, and whatever care they may exercise, the law of averages suggests that eventually something terrible will happen. It's an open question as to how the CouchSurfing community will react or how the experiment will survive the bad press sure to follow.

    There are other problems, too. From the beginning, CouchSurfing has operated as a nonprofit funded by donations. While that's created a sense of community ownership, it has also produced significant limitations, and the strains are beginning to show. By Fenton's own admission, he's trying to run the equivalent of a high-traffic multimillion-dollar website on an income that amounted to about $100,000 this year (most of it brought in by donation). Rather than a team of paid employees, he has a band of peripatetic volunteer programmers. The financial constraints came to a head last June when a perfect storm of system failures, brought on by cost-cutting, led to a complete server meltdown. At the time, Fenton thought everything was lost: two years worth of data, the profiles of 100,000 members. Despondent, he posted a letter to the web signaling the end of the project—"CouchSurfing as we know it doesn't exist anymore," he wrote. Predictably, howls of protest ensued, the community itself refused to be disbanded, and within a few weeks whatever data had not been recovered was created anew. But the fact of that failure still hovers over the community, a painful reminder of how ephemeral its endeavor really is.

    In June of 2006, just as MySpace neared 80 million users and Facebook approached 8 million, an article, "Social Isolation in America," appeared in the American Sociological Review. The work of sociologists at Duke and the University of Arizona, it examined two national surveys of the American public, one in 1985 and the other in 2004. Their research found that the average number of people with whom Americans discuss important issues has dropped by nearly a third, from about three to two. Even more startling is that one-quarter of Americans say they have no one with whom to discuss their most important matters—twice as many as in 1984. This would suggest that in the same 20 years that saw the rise and triumph of communication technologies—the proliferation of email, cell phones, BlackBerries, and MySpace—our circle of close friends and confidants has shrunk by a significant margin. We are somehow more connected than we once were, and more isolated than ever before.

    The role of the internet in this trend is the subject of considerable academic debate. Some sociologists argue that sites like MySpace might not promote strong ties between people, but they do greatly enable weak ones. And these connections lead to jobs, apartments, and partners (for some people, Craigslist alone has provided all three). A recent report by the Pew Internet and American Life Project says, "Research is showing that the internet is not destroying relationships [but rather] enabling people to maintain existing ties, often to strengthen them, and at times to forge new ties."

    Others are less sanguine, however. Lynn Smith-Lovin, one of the sociologists behind the Duke study, says of online social networks, "I don't think they're connecting us in a deeper or more complete way than before. But neither are they driving out close personal contact. They are another route for information, and they allow us to develop more specialized communities." But face-to-face encounters, she says, are the sine qua non of strong ties; a relationship can begin online but without in-person interaction it is unlikely to be sustained in any important way.

    CouchSurfing, for all its problems, might well be an example of an online social network that actually works. It brings about real conversation. It harnesses the tools of social networking software to create meaningful in-person encounters—Fenton's "right person in the right situation at the right time." And it has begun, however quietly, to pull down the curtains that separate us from one another. The evidence is there on the site itself, in the testimonies of friendship between people who were once strangers but who met, say, over a weekend in Prague and whose lives were changed utterly as a result. And it is not just young people who are being brought together. I spoke with a
    76-year-old grandmother from Petaluma, California, who had "CouchSurfed" her way through Greece for several weeks. As she put it, "Who wants to sit in a lonely hotel?"

    On my last day in Montreal, I sit with Fenton on the back porch of the Collective's apartment. The place is a hive of activity—people scurrying in and out of rooms, constant footsteps on the stairs, the shower running incessantly—but the porch is quiet. In the stillness of the morning, Fenton describes plans for a "CouchSurfing University," a layer within the network that will allow someone to design a trip not by destination but for the purpose of learning something new: a skill, a craft, or, more vaguely, "life wisdom." For Fenton, who couldn't afford college and dropped out after his freshman year, it's clearly an enticing idea, and as he talks about it, his words tumble out in an eager rush.

    There are constant interruptions. Fenton's cell phone rings or someone bursts through the door with pressing news: a friend needs to be picked up at the airport, a programming problem has arisen, so-and-so has been stopped at the border (Canadian customs officials seem to be weirdly paranoid about the Collective). Fenton himself seems tired, faint dark crescents hang beneath his eyes and his voice is laced with weariness, but he responds to each interruption with his full attention and with an unflappable calm. As he deals with one problem after another, it begins to dawn on me that he is both liberated and imprisoned by the social network he's fashioned. It has opened a world to him, bestowed friendship and adventure and purpose. But tens of thousands of people have come to depend on the site, and the site still depends almost entirely upon him.

    I ask Fenton whether he feels at all overwhelmed. He considers this, and shifts in his seat. Yes, he says, finally, but the good still outweighs the bad. "Years ago I was a kid sitting in a room by myself and the world was a big place," he says, looking out past the porch. "Now I can go anywhere in the world and I feel as if I'd have family there. I have a huge family now, and the world has become a small place." At this he smiles and runs a hand across his face. He seems momentarily appeased by this thought, by the knowledge that a shy person like himself could, in effect, conjure a family of friends.
    But soon enough the disruptions return, and Fenton is needed. He hauls himself up, says goodbye, and trudges back into the chaos and clamor of the apartment. The Collective swarms around him, a dozen people whirling in an orbit of industry and excitement, and Fenton slips among them, disappearing once more into the universe of his own creation.

    Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!

  •  

    Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

    Relatives of four security guards killed in Iraq in 2004 spoke at a House hearing Wednesday. The guards were employed by Blackwater USA.

    February 8, 2007

    Army Says It Will Withhold $19.6 Million From Halliburton, Citing Potential Contract Breach

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 — The Army announced during a House oversight committee hearing on Wednesday that it would withhold $19.6 million from the Halliburton Company after recently discovering that the contractor had hired the company Blackwater USA to provide armed security guards in Iraq, a potential breach of its government contract.

    The Army has said that its contracts with Halliburton, which has a five-year, $16 billion deal to support American military operations in Iraq, generally barred the company and its subcontractors from using private armed guards. But in a statement, Halliburton disagreed with the Army's interpretation and suggested that there was nothing to prohibit Halliburton's subcontractors from hiring such guards.

    The announcement came during a hearing of the House Government Oversight Committee that included emotional testimony about the killing of four Blackwater employees in Falluja, Iraq, in 2004.

    In an e-mail message made public in the hearing and written only hours before the four were killed, another Blackwater worker told the company to end the "smoke and mirror show" and provide its employees in the war zone with adequate weapons and armored vehicles.

    "I need ammo," the worker, Tom Powell, said in an e-mail message dated March 30, 2004, to supervisors at Blackwater, which is based in North Carolina. "I need Glocks and M4s — all the client body armor you got," he wrote. "Guys are in the field with borrowed stuff and in harm's way."

    Mr. Powell said he had requested heavily armored vehicles "from the beginning, and from my understanding, an order is still pending."

    "Why? I ask," he added.

    The next day, a mob in Falluja attacked a supply convoy that was being guarded by Blackwater employees and killed four guards, later stringing up two of the mutilated, charred bodies from a bridge. The men were riding in vehicles that were only lightly armored, and their families have claimed in a lawsuit against Blackwater that the company failed to provide basic protective equipment.

    Blackwater's general counsel, Andrew G. Howell, told the House panel on Wednesday that the company, which also had a State Department contract to provide security services, believed that it had had an appropriate number of armored vehicles in Iraq. He said, "We have not skimped on equipment — no sir."

    The panel is investigating Blackwater and the work of other large American military contractors in Iraq.

    In the dispute with Halliburton, the Army insisted repeatedly to Congressional investigators last year that it could find no evidence that Blackwater had been hired by Halliburton and its subcontractors in Iraq for security.

    But in a letter dated Tuesday and made public on Wednesday, Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey said that additional investigation showed that Blackwater had provided private security guards for a Halliburton subcontractor, ESS Support Services, a construction and food services business, and that the costs "were not itemized in the contracts or invoices" prepared by ESS.

    "The Army is continuing to investigate this matter and we are committed to providing full disclosures of the results of our investigations to the committee," he wrote to the chairman of the oversight committee, Henry A. Waxman, a California Democrat. "We share your commitment to ensuring that contractors supporting the military and reconstruction efforts in Iraq comply with the terms and conditions of these contracts."

    In a statement, Halliburton insisted that it was not in breach of its contract with the government.

    "Nowhere does it prohibit subcontractors from supplementing that protection with private security," Halliburton said. "It is unrealistic to think that the military can both wage a war and at the same time protect every necessary civilian movement in Iraq." The company said it would "sit down with the Army to discuss and resolve these issues."

    The committee also heard from family members of the four security guards.

    "Why did Blackwater choose to make a profit over the safety of our loved ones?" asked Kathryn Helvenston-Wettengel, the mother of one of the men. "Blackwater gets paid for the number of warm bodies it can put on the ground in certain locations throughout the world. If some are killed, it replaces them at a moment's notice."

    "Although everyone remembers those images of the bodies being burnt, beaten, dragged through the streets and ultimately hung from a bridge, we continue to relive that horror day after day, as those men were our fathers, sons and husbands," she said.

    5 Charged in Iraq Bribery Scheme

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 (Reuters) — Three Army Reserve officers and two American civilians have been charged with taking or arranging for more than $1 million in cash, sports cars, jewelry and other items to be used as bribes in rigging bids on Iraqi reconstruction contracts, United States officials said Wednesday.

    They said the five have been indicted by a federal grand jury in New Jersey in a scheme that involved the theft of millions of dollars of Iraq reconstruction money and the awarding of contracts to Philip Bloom, who doled out the bribes.

    The officials said the agency in charge of Iraqi reconstruction lost more than $3.6 million because of the corruption scheme that began in December 2003 and lasted two years.

    Mr. Bloom, who has already pleaded guilty, received more than $8.6 million in rigged contracts, the officials said.

    They said more than $500,000 was smuggled into the United States. "They stole the money in Iraq and then smuggled vast sums into the United States to support lavish lifestyles," said Mark W. Everson, the Internal Revenue Service commissioner.

    The 25-count indictment charged Col. Curtis Whiteford, Lt. Col. Debra Harrison and Lt. Col. Michael Wheeler, and two civilians, Michael Morris and William Driver.

    Colonel Whiteford was once the second-most senior official in the Coalition Provisional Authority for the South Central Region in Iraq, while Colonel Harrison was its acting comptroller. Colonel Wheeler was an adviser for Iraqi reconstruction projects.

    Mr. Driver is married to Colonel Harrison. Mr. Morris, who was living in Romania, was accused of helping Mr. Bloom funnel money to the military officials.


     

    Carlos Osorio/Associated Press

    Mitt Romney gave the first major policy speech of his presidential campaign Wednesday in an address to the Detroit Economic Club.

    February 8, 2007

    Mormon Candidate Braces for Religion as Issue

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 — As he begins campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination, Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, is facing a threshold issue: Will his religion — he is a Mormon — be a big obstacle to winning the White House?

    Polls show a substantial number of Americans will not vote for a Mormon for president. The religion is viewed with suspicion by Christian conservatives, a vital part of the Republicans' primary base.

    Mr. Romney's advisers acknowledged that popular misconceptions about Mormonism — as well as questions about whether Mormons are beholden to their church's leaders on public policy — could give his opponents ammunition in the wide-open fight among Republicans to become the consensus candidate of social conservatives.

    Mr. Romney, in an extended interview on the subject as he drove through South Carolina last week, expressed confidence that he could quell concerns about his faith, pointing to his own experience winning in Massachusetts. He said he shared with many Americans the bafflement over obsolete Mormon practices like polygamy — he described it as "bizarre" — and disputed the argument that his faith would require him to be loyal to his church before his country.

    "People have interest early on in your religion and any similar element of your background," he said. "But as soon as they begin to watch you on TV and see the debates and hear you talking about issues, they are overwhelmingly concerned with your vision of the future and the leadership skills that you can bring to bear."

    Still, Mr. Romney is taking no chances. He has set up a meeting this month in Florida with 100 ministers and religious broadcasters. That gathering follows what was by all accounts a successful meeting at his home last fall with evangelical leaders, including the Rev. Jerry Falwell; the Rev. Franklin Graham, who is a son of the Rev. Billy Graham; and Paula White, a popular preacher.

    Mr. Romney said he was giving strong consideration to a public address about his faith and political views, modeled after the one John F. Kennedy gave in 1960 in the face of a wave of concern about his being a Roman Catholic.

    Mr. Romney's aides said he had closely studied Kennedy's speech in trying to measure how to navigate the task of becoming the nation's first Mormon president, and he has consulted other Mormon elected leaders, including Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, about how to proceed.

    Mr. Romney appears to be making some headway. Several prominent evangelical leaders said that, after meeting him, they had grown sufficiently comfortable with the notion of Mr. Romney as president to overcome any concerns they might have about his religion.

    On a pragmatic level, some said that Mr. Romney — despite questions among conservatives about his shifting views on abortion and gay rights — struck them as the Republican candidate best able to win and carry their social conservative agenda to the White House.

    "There's this growing acceptance of this idea that Mitt Romney may well be and is our best candidate," said Jay Sekulow, the chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, a conservative legal advocacy group, and a prominent host on Christian radio.

    Mark DeMoss, an evangelical public relations consultant who represents many conservative Christian groups, said it was "more important to me that a candidate shares my values than my faith," adding, "And if I look at it this way, Mr. Romney would be my top choice."

    Mormons consider themselves to be Christians, but some beliefs central to Mormons are regarded by other churches as heretical. For example, Mormons have three books of Scripture other than the Bible, including the Book of Mormon, which Mormons believe was translated from golden plates discovered in 1827 by Joseph Smith Jr., the church's founder and first prophet.

    Mormons believe that Smith rescued Christianity from apostasy and restored the church to what was envisioned in the New Testament — but these doctrines are beyond the pale for most Christian churches.

    Beyond that, there are perceptions among some people regarding the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as the church is formally known, that account for at least some of the public unease: that Mormons still practice polygamy (the church renounced polygamy in 1890), that it is more of a cult than a religion and that its members take political direction from the church's leaders.

    Several Republicans said such perceptions could be a problem for Mr. Romney, especially in the South, which has had a disproportionate influence in selecting Republican presidential nominees.

    Gloria A. Haskins, a state representative from South Carolina who is supporting Senator John McCain for the Republican nomination, said discussions with her constituents in Greenville, an evangelical stronghold, convinced her that a Mormon like Mr. Romney could not win a Republican primary in her state. South Carolina has one of the earliest, and most critical, primaries next year.

    "From what I hear in my district, it is very doubtful," Ms. Haskins said. "This is South Carolina. We're very mainstream, evangelical, Christian, conservative. It will come up. In this of all states, it will come up."

    But Katon Dawson, the state Republican chairman, said he thought Mr. Romney had made significant progress in dealing with those concerns. "I have heard him on his personal faith and on his character and conviction and the love for his country," Mr. Dawson said. "I have all confidence that he will be able to answer those questions, whether they be in negative ads against him or in forums or in debates."

    Mr. Romney's candidacy has stirred discussion about faith and the White House unlike any since Kennedy, including a remarkable debate that unfolded recently in The New Republic. Damon Linker, a critic of the influence of Christian conservatism on politics, described Mormonism as a "theologically unstable, and thus politically perilous, religion."

    The article brought a stinging rebuttal in the same publication from Richard Lyman Bushman, a Mormon who is a history professor at Columbia University, and who said Mr. Linker's arguments had "no grounding in reality."

    Mr. Romney is not the first Mormon to seek a presidential nomination, but by every indication he has the best chance yet of being in the general election next year. His father, George Romney, was a candidate in 1968, but his campaign collapsed before he ever had to deal seriously with questions about religion.

    Senator Hatch said his own candidacy in 2000, which was something of a long shot, was to "knock down prejudice against my faith."

    "There's a lot of prejudice out there," Mr. Hatch said. "We've come a long way, but there are still many people around the country who consider the Mormon faith a cult."

    But if Mr. Romney has made progress with evangelicals, he appears to face a larger challenge in dispelling apprehensions among the public at large. A national poll by The Los Angeles Times and Bloomberg News last June found 37 percent said they would not vote for a Mormon for president.

    Mr. Romney offered assurances that seemed to reflect what Kennedy told the nation in discussing his Catholicism some 50 years ago. Mr. Romney said the requirements of his faith would never overcome his political obligations. He pointed out that in Massachusetts, he had signed laws allowing stores to sell alcohol on Sundays, even though he was prohibited by his faith from drinking, and to expand the state lottery, though Mormons are forbidden to gamble. He also noted that Mormons are not exclusively Republicans, pointing to Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic majority leader.

    "There's no church-directed view," Mr. Romney said. "How can you have Harry Reid on one side and Orrin Hatch on the other without recognizing that the church doesn't direct political views? I very clearly subscribe to Abraham Lincoln's view of America's political religion. And that is when you take the oath of office, your responsibility is to the nation, and that is first and foremost."

    He said he was not concerned about the resistance in the polls. "If you did a poll and said: 'Could a divorced actor be elected as president? Would you vote for a divorced actor as president?' my guess is 70 percent would say no. But then they saw Ronald Reagan. They heard him. They heard his vision. They heard his experience. They said: 'I like Ronald Reagan. I'm voting for him.' "

    Adam Nagourney reported from Washington, and Laurie Goodstein from New York.


     

    Winter Storm Moves to East Coast

    Neither Snow Nor Rain . . .

    Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

    Neither Snow Nor Rain . . . A postal worker braves the wind and snow along Henry Street in Brooklyn today

    Winter Storm Moves to East Coast

    Peter Morgan/Associated Press


    A winter storm with strong winds hit New York today.

    February 14, 2007

    Winter Storm Moves to East Coast

    Schools were closed, airline flights were delayed and commuters were miserable today as a snow and ice storm reached the East Coast after paralyzing parts of Midwest on Tuesday.

    Cities along the I-95 corridor from Washington to New York braced for a second dose of sleet and freezing rain during the evening commute while areas near Boston are expected to get some snow before sleet and freezing rain are added to the mix.

    The precipitation is expected to end over night as the storm moves up the Northeast coast.

    The National Weather Service predicted that wind chills in the New York area will be below zero tonight and Thursday night due to low temperatures and blustery winds accompanying the first substantial winter storm of the season.

    Winds tonight are forecast to reach 25 to 35 miles per hour with gusts up to 50 miles per hour in the region. The weather service warned that the sub-zero wind chills can cause the life-threatening health conditions of frostbite and hypothermia.

    The weather service issued blizzard warnings for parts of New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine, where as much as two feet of snow was considered possible.

    As much as 20 inches of snow was forecast for upper New York State, which was already groaning under more than 10 feet of lake-effect snow deposited earlier this year. Northern Pennsylvania was forecast to get 18 to 24 inches of new snow.

    Snowfall in the coastal areas was expected to amount to a few inches, but sleet and freezing rain made travel treacherous. Dozens of schools in the New York metropolitan area were closed while others, particularly on Long Island were scheduled to open late. Philadelphia schools were closed as were hundreds more across Pennsylvania.

    The weather service issued a flood watch from 9 a.m. to this evening for areas near Philadelphia, including northern Delaware, northeast Maryland, southern New Jersey and southeast Pennsylvania. The weather service said some of these areas may see as much as two inches of rain, which will not be absorbed by the frozen ground.

    Major airlines canceled half their flights today at Chicago's O'Hare Airport and half the flights were called off at Philadelphia Airport. Amtrak reported delays on its main line between Baltimore and Philadelphia due to signal problems.

    Sheriffs in several counties in Ohio closed roads to all but emergency workers today, extending a ban begun on Tuesday, and said anyone caught driving could be arrested. As many as 100,000 homes and businesses in the state were without power as the storm downed tree limbs and electrical lines.


     

    Frederic J. Brown/AFP -- Getty Images

    The deal was called "a very solid step forward" by the chief American envoy at the talks in Beijing, Christopher R. Hill.

    February 14, 2007
    News Analysis

    Outside Pressures Broke Korean Deadlock

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 13 — It is hard to imagine that either George W. Bush or Kim Jong-il would have agreed even a year ago to the kind of deal they have now approved. The pact, announced Tuesday, would stop, seal and ultimately disable North Korea's nuclear facilities, as part of a grand bargain that the administration has previously shunned as overly generous to a repressive country — especially one that has not yet said when or if it will give up its nuclear arsenal.

    But in the past few months, the world has changed for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Kim, two men who have made clear how deeply they detest each other. Both are beset by huge problems, and both needed some kind of breakthrough.

    For Mr. Bush, bogged down in Iraq, his authority undercut by the November elections, any chance to show progress in peacefully disarming a country that detonated a nuclear test just four months ago could no longer be passed up. As one senior administration official said over the weekend, the prospect that Mr. Bush might leave Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and North Korea more dangerous places than he found them "can't be very appealing."

    Still, the accord came under fast criticism from right and left that it was both too little and too late.

    For years, Mr. Bush's administration has been paralyzed by an ideological war, between those who wanted to bring down North Korea and those who thought it was worth one more try to lure the country out of isolation. In embracing this deal, Mr. Bush sided with those who have counseled engagement, notably his secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, and her chief negotiator, Christopher R. Hill. Mr. Bush took the leap in the hope that in a few months, he will be able to declare that North Korea can no longer produce fuel for new nuclear weapons, even if it has not yet turned over its old ones.

    For Mr. Kim, the nuclear explosion — more of a fizzle — that he set off in the mountains not far from the Chinese border in October turned out to be a strategic mistake. The Chinese, who spent six decades protecting the Kim family dynasty, responded by cutting off his military aid, and helping Washington crack down on the banks that financed the Cognac-and-Mercedes lifestyle of the North Korean leadership.

    "As a political statement, their test was a red flare for everyone," said Robert Gallucci, who under President Clinton was the chief negotiator of the 1994 agreement with North Korea, which collapsed four years ago. "It gave President Bush and the Chinese some leverage."

    Mr. Gallucci and other nuclear experts agree that the hardest bargaining with world's most reclusive, often paranoid, government remains ahead.

    Over the next year, under the pact, the North must not only disable its nuclear reactors and reprocessing facilities, it must lead inspectors to its weapons and a suspected second nuclear weapons program. And to get to the next phase of the agreement, the one that gives "disarmament" meaning, North Korea will have to be persuaded to give away the country's crown jewels: the weapons that make the world pay attention to it.

    But before the administration faces off against Mr. Kim in Pyongyang, it will have to confront the many critics of the deal here at home. As the White House took credit on Tuesday for what it called a "first step," it found itself pilloried by conservatives who attacked the administration for folding in negotiations with a charter member of what Mr. Bush called the "axis of evil," and for replicating key elements of Mr. Clinton's agreement with North Korea.

    At the same time, Mr. Bush's advisers were being confronted by barbs from veterans of the Clinton administration, who argued that the same deal struck Tuesday had been within reach several years and a half-dozen weapons ago, had only Mr. Bush chosen to negotiate with the North rather than fixate on upending its government.

    In fact, elements of the new decision closely resemble the Clinton deal, called the Agreed Framework. As it did in that accord, the North agrees to "freeze" its operations at Yongbyon, its main nuclear facility, and to allow inspections there. And like that agreement, the new one envisions the North's ultimately giving up all of its nuclear material.

    In two respects, however, the new accord is different: North Korea does not receive the incentives the West has offered — in this case, about a year's supply of heavy fuel oil and other aid — until it "disables" its equipment at Yongbyon and declares where it has hidden its bombs, nuclear fuel and other nuclear facilities. And the deal is not only with Washington, but with Beijing, Moscow, Seoul and Tokyo.

    "We're building a set of relationships," Ms. Rice argued Tuesday, saying that the deal would not have been possible if she and President Bush had not been able to swing the Chinese over to their side. Mr. Bush has told colleagues that he believes the turning point came in his own blunt conversations with President Hu Jintao of China, in which, the American president has said, he explained in stark terms that a nuclear North Korea was more China's problem than America's.

    But the administration was clearly taken aback on Tuesday by the harshness of the critique from the right, led by its recently departed United Nations ambassador, John R. Bolton, who charged that the deal "undercuts the sanctions resolution" against the North that he pushed through the Security Council four months ago.

    Democrats, in contrast, were caught between enjoying watching Mr. Bush change course and declaring that the agreement amounted to disarmament-lite. "It gives the illusion of moving more rapidly to disarmament, but it doesn't really require anything to happen in the second phase," said Joel Wit, who was the coordinator of the 1994 agreement.

    The Bush administration is counting on the lure of future benefits to the North — fuel oil, the peace treaty ending the Korean War it has long craved, an end to other sanctions — to force Mr. Kim to disclose where his nuclear weapons and fuel are stored.

    Mr. Bush's big worry now is that Mr. Kim is playing the administration for time. Many experts think he is betting that by the time the first big deliveries of oil and aid are depleted, America will be distracted by a presidential election.

    But Mr. Bush could also end up with a diplomatic triumph, one he needs desperately. To get there, he appears to have changed course. Asked in 2004 about North Korea, he said, "I don't think you give timelines to dictators and tyrants."

    Now he appears to have concluded that sometimes the United States has to negotiate with dictators and odious rulers, because the other options — military force, sanctions or watching an unpredictable nation gain a nuclear arsenal — seem even worse.


     

    Memo From Italy

    Orietta Scardino/European Pressphoto Agency

    A policeman was killed recently in a riot at a stadium in Sicily despite a law requiring measures against hooliganism.

    February 14, 2007
    Memo From Italy

    Breaking All the Rules, With a Shrug and a Sigh

    ROME, Feb. 13 — The shrugged shoulder is real, a daily reminder here that part of Italy's charm rests in the fact that it does not much care for rules. Italians can be downright poetic about it, this inclination to dodge taxes, to cut lines, to erect entire neighborhoods without permits or simply to run red lights, while smoking or talking on the phone.

    "We undervalue the law of cause and effect," said Lisa Tumino, who runs a bed-and-breakfast here near the Vatican. "We overvalue the law of the universe."

    This nugget was mined with a single, simple question: Why were Ms. Tumino, in her beat-up white Nissan, and two dozen other Roman drivers parked on Via delle Fornaci on a recent rainy day when parking there clogged traffic, made the roads more dangerous and was, in fact, illegal?

    Boiled down, she was saying: No sterile, one-size-fits-all rule book applies here. Italians prefer a more individual justice for their reality and the long history that shaped it. In this case, ancient streets do not allow for adequate parking.

    But every now and again, Italians wake up to the unpleasant reality that whatever the reasons, however lightly it can be explained, breaking the rules is also part of Italy's malaise. Two weeks ago, a 38-year-old policeman with two children was killed during a riot at a soccer stadium in Sicily — two years after a law mandating antihooliganism measures was passed and widely ignored.

    Of 31 stadiums surveyed after the killing, only six were found to comply with the law.

    In this case, a life was lost (though some skeptics noted that compliance might not have saved that life, because the riot happened outside the stadium). But in this and scores of other ways, contempt for rules ends up to be not so charming.

    Beppe Grillo, the Italian political satirist, keeps a running list on his Web site of members of the Italian Parliament or Italian representatives to the European Parliament, 25 in all, who have been convicted of crimes.

    Just last week, an Italian newspaper reported the existence of a new little town outside Naples, of 50 structures and 435 apartments, for which not a single building permit had been issued. About 31,000 illegal structures reportedly went up in 2005 alone.

    Just last year, Italy slid into the last place in Europe for direct investment from the United States, with an economy that has struggled for years. Business people complain about a complicated culture of rules — those broken, as well as those impossible to understand.

    Paolo Catalfamo, now the managing director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Italy, recalled the six years he spent managing an American investment fund here.

    "The issue I spent most of my time on was trying to explain to my headquarters in San Francisco why the rules they received had to be interpreted," he said. "They didn't get the concept that rules don't have one meaning only, that they have many meanings."

    Like most things in this nation, built on layers of the past, physical and mental, it is not always easy to explain. The standard answer encompasses Italy's fragmented history, of often arbitrary regional rule by foreigners, local nobles and a church with claims of the blessing of God.

    Some experts contend that the Roman Catholic Church holds no small responsibility: Sins can be forgiven. No single standard exists for salvation; each person's life is weighed on its own. Relatives of the dead can pray for intervention from about 2,500 saints — a system perfectly calibrated for Italy's individualistic ethos.

    Faced with greedy and hostile authority over many chaotic centuries, it is argued, Italians fell back into the idea that only the family can be trusted. Everything outside the family and clan can be ignored, or tricked into submission.

    "We are a people of saints, heroes, improvisers and artful fixers; above all, we are cunning," a 1986 study on Italian values concluded, finding the nation's mind-set little changed over time. "Our cunningness consists of believing that others will take advantage of us if we do not first take advantage of them."

    The state responded to its own weakness by imposing too many laws. Alexander Stille, a professor at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism who has written books about Italy, cited figures from several years ago showing that Italy had some 90,000 laws on the books, while France had 7,325 and Germany, 5,587. But Italy's laws are poorly enforced. The country also has the slowest courts in Europe.

    "The problem is with so many rules, it's almost impossible to obey them all, and they are applied badly," he said. "Italians are almost forced into illegality by a poorly functioning system."

    While the centrist politicians who ruled Italy since World War II were plenty corrupt, many experts say the antirules culture reached it apex in the political career of Silvio Berlusconi. Mr. Stille argues that Mr. Berlusconi, twice elected prime minister, created a political constituency of tax cheats and people with illegally built houses.

    "If you ask me for 50 percent or more in taxes," Mr. Berlusconi once said, "it's unjust, and I feel morally justified, if I have the possibility, to evade them."

    And, dutifully, after each of his elections, in 1994 and 2000, he introduced amnesties for people with unpaid taxes and illegal houses.

    In the last two weeks, in the anger over the death at the stadium, some Italians have asked whether anything can be done. The short answer, most experts say, is probably not.

    The government of the new prime minister, Romano Prodi, is weak. And in Europe, national culture has proved resistant to change, frustrating backers of a tighter, more coherent European Union of 27 idiosyncratic states.

    Still optimists hold out hope: Mr. Catalfamo, of the Chamber of Commerce, says that even if foreign investment is low, it is easier to do business in Italy now than it was 10 years ago. Others note that the nation's political class is old and cannot hold on forever. Many argue that Italy's young people are different from their parents.

    "Young Italians are traveling more," said Carlo Alberto Morosetti, 44, a business editor at one of Italy's public television stations. "They surf the Web. They speak more languages."

    Plus, life here is very good — the food, the sea, an unhurried way of living, at a standard that may have slipped in recent years but remains remarkably high. The question, with so much so good, is whether there is any will to change.

    Peter Kiefer and Elisabetta Povoledo contributed reporting.

     

    Today's Papers

    The Iraqi House Rules
    By Daniel Politi
    Posted Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007, at 5:38 AM E.T.

    The New York Times leads, and the Wall Street Journal tops its world-wide newsbox, with news that the Iraqi government announced measures that will be implemented as part of the new security crackdown. In a televised address, Lt. Gen. Aboud Qanbar, who is in charge of the new plan, ordered those who are occupying homes illegally to leave and announced a 72-hour closing of Iraq's borders with Iran and Syria, an expanded curfew in Baghdad, and the suspension of weapons licenses. The Washington Post leads with the House of Representatives beginning to debate the nonbinding resolution against President Bush's new plan for Iraq.

    USA Today leads with a Homeland Security assessment that says tests to try to find a new technology to successfully screen subway and rail passengers for bombs have failed. All the "futuristic screening equipment" tested as part of the $7 million program had problems, and they would all be expensive to implement. The Los Angeles Times leads locally but goes high with complaints springing from Bank of America's announcement that it is giving credit cards to immigrants who may not have a Social Security number. The WSJ reported on the cards Tuesday, which led to complaints and government officials saying criminals could exploit the program. The program is being tested in 51 Los Angeles County branches but it could go national this year. The paper sees this as another sign of how businesses are trying to turn the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants into customers.

    As part of the new security measures, Qanbar also said the government reserves the right to listen in on phone calls, open mail, and break into homes and cars. The NYT focuses on the announcement, which apparently surprised even American officers, that those who illegally occupied homes have 15 days to leave. The Times characterizes it as "a monumental task," and even that might be an understatement. There's no telling how many people have actually occupied homes, there's no system in place to verify people's claims, and, quite simply, there don't seem to be enough security forces to carry out the work. It is unclear what the role of U.S. forces would be in all this. The paper talks to genocide expert Samantha Power, who says either the plan will never be enforced, or it could be the beginning of more killings. "Unless you create security first, you are paving the way for a potential massacre of returnees," says Powers.

    The LAT puts a human face to the issue of occupied homes with a Page One first-person piece by one of the paper's Iraqi translators. Said Rifai tells of how she felt completely powerless when she got word that gunmen had "house-jacked" her childhood home. Even after she finds out U.S. forces raided her house, her troubles aren't over, as Rifai now has to worry officers will think her family provided a safe house for insurgents. As a side note, the LAT continues to be the only major paper to regularly give prominent placement to these types of stories written by Iraqis. Why?

    Democrats in the House urged lawmakers to send a clear signal to the White House that there will be "no more blank checks for President Bush on Iraq," as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said. The NYT notes that as part of the "tightly choreographed" debate, members of Congress who are veterans were among the first to speak. Meanwhile, many Republicans found themselves in the unenviable position of trying to argue that the resolution is insignificant but, at the same time, very damaging to U.S. interests.

    The papers report that senior administration officials claim Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr has been living in Iran for the past few weeks. The officials were careful to note Sadr has family in Iran and he has left before. But that didn't stop officials from speculating his trip might be related to the new security crackdown. The LAT catches word from Sadr's aides, who insist the cleric has not left Iraq.

    The WP and NYT front attorneys for I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby announcing they won't call either Libby or Vice President Dick Cheney to testify. This sudden change in the expected strategy seems to show defense attorneys think having Libby and Cheney on the witness stand could do more harm than good.

    The Post fronts, and everyone else mentions, news that federal prosecutors have indicted the former No. 3 official at the CIA and a defense contractor. Prosecutors allege Kyle Foggo used his seniority to hand over contracts to his longtime friend Brent Wilkes, who bribed the former CIA official. This is all related to a criminal investigation of former Rep. Randy Cunningam, who is currently serving eight years in prison for accepting bribes. Wilkes allegedly bribed Cunningham with trips, prostitutes, lavish meals, and various other goodies. The Post and NYT mention the indictment came days before a key U.S. attorney involved in the investigation, Carol Lam, is set to step down. Some Democrats in Congress say Lam was forced out by the Justice Department for political reasons.

    Over in the Post's op-ed page, former Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith defends himself from accusations that he inappropriately handled pre-war intelligence. Feith says that if the inspector general's report, which chastised his role in intelligence activities before the Iraq war, hadn't become "part of a political battle" then it would have never turned into a big deal. "Sensible people recognize the importance of vigorous questioning of intelligence by the CIA's 'customers,' " Feith writes. He also claims only four senior administration officials received the briefing and they could have never confused it for an intelligence product since they knew it was coming from the Pentagon.

    Daniel Politi writes "Today's Papers" for Slate. He can be reached at todayspapers@slate.com.

     

     

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press

    I. Lewis Libby Jr. and one of his lawyers, William H. Jeffress Jr., arriving Tuesday at court in Washington

    February 14, 2007

    Libby and Cheney Won't Testify, Says the Defense

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 13 — Lawyers defending I. Lewis Libby Jr. against perjury charges surprised the courtroom on Tuesday by saying that they would rest their case this week and do so without putting on the stand either Mr. Libby or Vice President Dick Cheney.

    Mr. Libby was Mr. Cheney's chief of staff.

    The decision means that Mr. Libby's defense, which will formally end on Wednesday, will have spanned barely three days. Mr. Libby's chief defense lawyer, Theodore V. Wells Jr., told Judge Reggie B. Walton that Mr. Libby had accepted the defense team's recommendation to end their presentation swiftly and send the case to the jury by next week.

    The decision could be viewed as a sign that Mr. Libby's lawyers are confident that the prosecution failed to make its case.

    Mr. Wells had earlier signaled strongly that he intended to call Mr. Libby and Mr. Cheney to testify, which suggests that the defense team recently analyzed the costs and benefits of putting them on the stand and concluded that their testimony would not, on balance, help Mr. Libby.

    One likely factor in that calculation is that putting Mr. Libby on the stand would expose him to a cross-examination by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the chief prosecutor, that could be withering. Mr. Fitzgerald complained that the defense had engaged in a "bait and switch" tactic by keeping Mr. Libby off the stand after repeatedly suggesting that he would testify.

    Mr. Cheney's testimony, which was much anticipated, would have set a precedent as the first appearance of a sitting vice president as a witness at a criminal trial. It was also expected to bolster a major part of Mr. Libby's defense: that he was so consumed by the crush of high-stakes issues like global terrorism and Iraq that he might not have remembered all the details of his conversations.

    But the trial threw up numerous instances in which Mr. Cheney took a personal role in managing the White House response to accusations from Joseph C. Wilson IV, a prominent critic of the Iraq war, that the evidence for going to war had been knowingly overstated. Mr. Cheney could have been exposed during cross-examination to uncomfortable questions about his close involvement in trying to undermine Mr. Wilson's criticisms.

    Mr. Wilson also said the identity of his wife as a Central Intelligence Agency operative was purposely leaked to the press in retaliation for his criticism. Mr. Libby is charged with lying to a grand jury and to F.B.I. agents investigating that leak.

    The jury is expected to hear final arguments from both sides beginning next Tuesday.

    Although the jury will not hear Mr. Libby in person, during the trial, prosecutors played eight hours of audiotapes in which Mr. Fitzgerald questioned him before the grand jury. The jury heard Mr. Libby giving his version calmly in the first two-thirds of the tapes and then seeming to become uneasy and less confident as Mr. Fitzgerald bore in.

    Prosecutors have said Mr. Libby learned of the identity of Mr. Wilson's wife, Valerie Wilson, from fellow administration officials in the summer of 2003 and discussed her with reporters. Mr. Libby swore that he had not discussed Ms. Wilson with reporters and believed that he had learned about her in a conversation on July 10 or 11 with Tim Russert of NBC News.

    Judith Miller, formerly of The New York Times, and Matthew Cooper, formerly of Time magazine, testified for the prosecution that Mr. Libby had discussed Ms. Wilson with them. Mr. Russert testified that he never discussed Ms. Wilson with Mr. Libby.

    The defense has argued that the three reporters have remembered their conversations incorrectly. And, if Mr. Libby testified incorrectly, it was because his memory was faulty because of the press of official business.

    Mr. Libby's lawyers were able to glean what would have been some of the benefits of Mr. Cheney's testimony through another witness on Tuesday.

    The witness, John Hannah, a former deputy to Mr. Libby who is now a national security adviser to Mr. Cheney, took the jurors on a tour of Mr. Libby's concerns in the summer of 2003, including the Iraq war, Islamic extremists' threat of a biological attack, Iranian and North Korean nuclear capabilities and diplomatic crises with Liberia and Turkey.

    In Mr. Hannah's account, Mr. Libby had barely time to draw an extra breath, starting with an early morning C. I. A. briefing "that covers the waterfront of the world."

    Mr. Hannah also provided testimony for another defense argument when he said Mr. Libby had a notoriously bad memory. "On certain things, Scooter just had an awful memory," he said, using Mr. Libby's nickname.

    He said that on occasion Mr. Libby would tell him some idea in the afternoon, having forgotten that he, Mr. Hannah, had given him the idea in the morning. Mr. Libby, sitting at the defense table, laughed. Mr. Hannah said in response to a question from a juror — an unusual procedure used by Judge Walton — that Mr. Libby had a good memory for ideas and concepts.

    Although Mr. Hannah testified for the defense for nearly two hours, the prosecutor, Mr. Fitzgerald, seemed to cut down much of the significance of his testimony in five minutes of cross-examination. Noting that Mr. Hannah had testified that he could usually have a few minutes alone with Mr. Libby only in the evening after the crush of business, Mr. Fitzgerald suggested that Mr. Libby would have devoted time only to matters of great concern to him in the week of July 6, 2003.

    "If he gave something an hour or two that week, it would be something Mr. Libby thought was important, right?" asked Mr. Fitzgerald.

    "Well, with regard to me, yes," Mr. Hannah replied.

    Left unsaid in the exchange was undisputed testimony that Mr. Libby spent nearly two hours on Tuesday, July 8, with Ms. Miller, then a Times reporter. Ms. Miller has testified that Mr. Libby told her in detail about Ms. Wilson at the meeting. Mr. Libby acknowledged meeting Ms. Miller to counter Mr. Wilson's accusations, but said he did not discuss Ms. Wilson.

    Underlying Mr. Hannah's testimony was a fierce legal battle between the defense team and prosecutors over how much the jury should be told of Mr. Libby's busy schedule now that he is not going to testify. One of his lawyers, John Cline, said, "We want to show he was caught in a tornado of information."

    Judge Walton ruled that without Mr. Libby's live testimony he would not allow Mr. Wells to argue in his closing that the issue of Ms. Wilson was far less important than the national security issues on his agenda.

    "I've said that relative importance is not going to be an issue on the table if Mr. Libby doesn't testify," he said.

    Jill Abramson, managing editor of The New York Times, testified earlier on Tuesday that she could not remember a conversation with Ms. Miller after the July 8 meeting with Mr. Libby. Ms. Miller had testified earlier in the trial that she had suggested to Ms. Abramson that day that The Times assign someone to look into the role of the Wilsons.

    Ms. Abramson, who was on the witness stand for less than five minutes, said, "It's possible I occasionally tuned her out," but said she had no recollection of the conversation.


     

    Great Safe Sex

    Don Hogan Charles/The New York Times

    Monique Binford told residents of two Queens co-ops that older people today were more sexually active, and ought to be prepared.

    February 14, 2007

    Greatest Generation Learns About Great Safe Sex

    The sex educators had come to a Queens housing complex to discuss condoms and foreplay and sexually transmitted diseases.

    Those assembled were told that their demographic was showing increases in sexual activity and an accompanying rise in promiscuity, homosexuality and H.I.V. infection.

    As the teacher, Monique Binford, delved into an unexpurgated discussion covering issues from vaginal dryness to Viagra, one student's cane clattered to the floor, another student adjusted his hearing aid and a third fidgeted in her orthopedic shoes. By the time Ms. Binford got around to describing a safe sexual act involving Saran Wrap, a woman shouted, "Enough, already!" and the room erupted in laughter.

    The sex educators had news for this class of 40 people in their 70s and 80s, just in time for Valentine's Day: Older folks are friskier than ever, and it's never too late to learn about safe sex.

    Sexually speaking, said Norm Sherman, who organized the presentation, "It ain't over till it's over."

    The class last Wednesday, for residents of what is known as a "naturally occurring retirement community" at the Queensview and North Queensview co-op complexes in Long Island City, was run by Selfhelp Community Services, a nonprofit agency that provides services for the elderly across New York City.

    The group's leaders said they started sex-education courses in January after noticing an increase in sexual activity among their elderly clients, something they attribute to the popularity of Viagra and testosterone supplements as well as women shedding the idea that sex is shameful. Along with the increase in sexual activity at senior residences, nursing homes and assisted living facilities, there are increased complications because of lack of knowledge, said Becky Bigio, another of the educators.

    A recent survey of people 45 and older, conducted by AARP, reported a sharp increase over the past several years of men using sex-enhancing drugs, and observed a corresponding "re-awakening" among women, who said their own sexual satisfaction had been enhanced. The study concluded that health care providers and patients were in need of sex education.

    Indeed, not one of the students raised a hand when Ms. Binford asked who had been to a class before where someone had demonstrated how to put on a condom.

    Ms. Bigio said many older people experience problems when resuming sexual activity after a long layoff, as when widows begin new relationships after long marriages that had perhaps slowed down sexually. Then there are sexually transmitted diseases spread by newly promiscuous Viagra takers, often undetected by doctors presuming that older patients are not sexually active.

    "We feel this is getting to be an area you can no longer ignore," Ms. Bigio told the group. In her presentation, Ms. Binford said she had also seen an uptick in homosexual activity among the elderly, and that more and more older people were being diagnosed with H.I.V., citing the recent case of an 82-year-old woman in the Bronx.

    While teenagers might be advised to rein in raging hormones, this class was warned about how incontinence, heart disease, diabetes and medication can contribute to erectile dysfunction; how a collapsed uterus can complicate penetration; and how vaginal dryness can lead to increased incidence of sexually transmitted disease.

    "I'm telling you right now I'm going to say the word penis and the word vagina because those are the anatomical terms and I hope you're O.K. with that," Ms. Binford said as she showed a model of the female genitalia, reproductive and excretory systems.

    Out of a pink Victoria's Secret shopping bag, Ms. Binford and Ms. Bigio pulled out lubricant and condoms. "You can actually get this in drugstores, so you don't have to go to sex shops or anything," Ms. Binford said of the lubricant, noting there were also coupons in her pink bag. "You can even get your lube flavored. After I get finished with you, you're all going to rush out and buy condoms."

    Bella Cohen, an 89-year-old widow in the front row, scoffed, "Oh yeah, by the thousands." Then, she inquired: "We can only use it if we have intercourse?"

    Ms. Binford replied, "We can talk later if you're thinking of other uses."

    Urging her charges to meet potential partners at senior centers, social functions and places of worship, Ms. Binford recommended carrying a "bag of tricks" containing condoms, lubricant and wipes. She explained where the clitoris is and how to achieve an orgasm by masturbation and mentioned the Saran Wrap maneuver, which provides protection for oral sex on a woman.

    "You're making us into sex queens," Mrs. Cohen said.

    Warning of the danger of taking Viagra with some heart medications, Ms. Binford recommended "cheap man's Viagra" — a metal ring that slides onto the penis to maintain the erection. "You can get them at the Eighth Avenue sex shops," she said. "It's a good field trip. Put your dark glasses and hat on."

    She recommended similar outings to stock up on condoms and exhorted the women to build sexual confidence and self-esteem by undressing in front of the mirror.

    "You've got to love you," she said.

    The condom-stuffed goodie bags were grabbed eagerly as class ended. Afterward, Barbara Gerbers, 89 and widowed, said she enjoyed the presentation, but would probably not put the knowledge into action.

    "No, I'm through with sex in my life," she said. "I grew up in a different era. The kids today are having more fun than I had, but they're also having abortions and all kinds of diseases."

    Mrs. Cohen, though, called the meeting "enlightening," saying she had been "brought up in a household where you never talked about sex," and the class "reminded us that sex is not a dirty word."

    "I came in thinking that sex is the furthest thing from my mind, it's just not important anymore," Mrs. Cohen added. "But, you know, we're not dead. There's still a chance to learn."


     

     

    Valentines Day

    The Shape of My Heart
    Where did the ubiquitous Valentine's symbol come from?
    By Keelin McDonell
    Posted Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2007, at 5:20 PM E.T.

    Americans will dole out countless Valentine's Day paraphernalia today, a good portion of which will be in the shape of hearts. In an "Explainer" column printed last year and reproduced below, Keelin McDonell attempted to track down the origin of the Valentine's Day symbol and explain how it got its familiar shape.

    It's Valentine's Day, and as usual, people are presenting their loved ones with heart-shaped cards, candy, and trinkets. How did the heart shape become the symbol of true love?

    Nobody's quite sure, but it might have to do with a North African plant. During the seventh century B.C., the city-state of Cyrene* had a lucrative trade in a rare, now-extinct plant: silphium. Although it was mostly used for seasoning, silphium was reputed to have an off-label use as a form of birth control. The silphium was so important to Cyrene's economy that coins were minted that depicted the plant's seedpod, which looks like the heart shape we know today. The theory goes that the heart shape first became associated with sex, and eventually, with love.

    The Catholic Church contends that the modern heart shape did not come along until the 17th century, when Saint Margaret Mary Alocoque had a vision of it surrounded by thorns. This symbol became known as the Sacred Heart of Jesus and was associated with love and devotion; it began popping up often in stained-glass windows and other church iconography. But while the Sacred Heart may have popularized the shape, most scholars agree that it existed much earlier than the 1600s.

    Less romantic ideas about the heart-shape's origin exist as well. Some claim that the modern heart-shape simply came from botched attempts to draw an actual human heart, the organ which the ancients, including Aristotle, believed contained all human passions. One leading scholar of heart iconography claims that the philosopher's physiologically inaccurate description of the human heart—as a three-chambered organ with a rounded top and pointy bottom—may have inspired medieval artists to create what we now know as the heart shape. The medieval tradition of courtly love may have reinforced the shape's association with romance. Hearts can be found on playing cards, tapestries, and paintings.

    Hearts proliferated when the exchange of Valentines gained popularity in 17th-century England. At first the notes were a simple affair, but the Victorians made the tradition more elaborate, employing the heart shape in tandem with ribbons and bows.

    Bonus Explainer: Why do we single out Feb. 14 to celebrate romance? It's said to be the day St. Valentine, a Roman priest during the third century, was executed. Legends about Valentine vary. Some say he was killed for illegally marrying Roman soldiers; others claim it was for helping Christians escape punishment at the hands of the pagan emperor. Just before his death, it's believed that he sent an affectionate note to the beautiful daughter of his jailer—the very first Valentine.

    Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.

    Explainer thanks Professor Eric Jager of UCLA.

    Correction, Feb. 15, 2006: This piece originally misspelled the name of the ancient city-state that traded in the plant silphium. It is Cyrene, not Cylene. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

    Keelin McDonell is an assistant editor at the New Republic.

     

  •  

    On the Run

    Eugene Richards/VII, for The New York Times

    Eugene Richards/VII, for The New York Times

    Crossroads Boquete retracing his path out of Glades Correctional Institution.

    February 11, 2007

    Fugitive

    "Orlando."

    In a dim, nearly deserted Everglades farm stand, nothing moved.

    Orlando Boquete, hybrid of youth and age — his body springy and athletic at 52, but knitted to a startlingly ancient head — peered at the stalls through thick eyeglasses.

    Other than a faint buzz, the shimmer of heat trapped in a tin roof, the word "Orlando" was the only sound.

    An impatient companion called to him.

    "Orlando. Hey, Orlando."

    Not a flicker, head to toe. For more than a decade, Orlando Boquete lived as a fugitive, his very identity a shackle he slipped out of, again and again. He hid bits of sandpaper in his wallet so that in a pinch, he could abrade his fingerprints. Every bit as revealing as the ridges of his fingers, the ordinary, reflexive responses to his own name — a grunt, a sideways glance, a shifting foot — also vanished under the grind of fugitive life. It was as if someone had suddenly clapped hands in front of his eyes and he did not blink. Standing still, not saying yes or hello or uh-huh became a martial art.

    The word "Orlando" floated in the thick, steaming air, then sank without trace into the wizened face.

    Technically, he was no longer running from anyone, so this denial was vestigial habit. He could say who he was. He lifted a mango, rolled the fruit in the palm of his hand, half-smiled and turned to greet the man behind the counter. He announced that he was Cuban. Then he asked a question.

    "Es Mejicano?"

    The fruit man nodded, yes, he was Mexican.

    At that, the words erupted from Boquete's mouth, personal history as volcanic rush.

    "These Mexicans in the sugar-cane fields helped me," he began. "Twenty-one years ago, when I escaped from Glades, I hid with them. Right here, by choo-choo."

    He pointed toward the railroad tracks, but the fruit-stand man did not shift his blank gaze. It was almost possible to see him rewind to the phrase "when I escaped from Glades."

    On the way into the town of Belle Glade, the welcome sign in this capital of sugar cane declares, "Her Soil Is Her Fortune," but another gravitational force goes unmentioned: Glades Correctional Institution, the state prison one mile down the road. The prison had brought Orlando Boquete to Belle Glade, but it could not keep him there.

    He started speaking in gusts of alternating language, Spanish one sentence, English the next phrase, a saga of life in flight — of hiding places in the sugar cane, disguises that tricked the police, gratitude to the Mexicans who helped him.

    Fugitivo.

    The fruit man did not bother to mask his anxiety. As he listened to Boquete, he slid the mango off the counter, with no sign that he was going to bag the purchases of this garrulous criminal. Boquete realized he should present his bona fides. He turned and pointed to me — here, this white newspaper writer from New York has come to look at the canals where he hid with alligators, the mucky fields where he crawled like a snake.

    "I don't read newspapers," the fruit man said blankly.

    At Boquete's shoulder, his nephew, José Boquete, spoke into his ear.

    "Tío," he said. And he stage-whispered into his uncle's ear, "DNA." Not missing a beat, the older man spoke the word "exonerated" and the abbreviation DNA and finally, three more letters that registered with the fruit man.

    "CNN," Boquete said.

    "Ahh," said the fruit man, who pointed to the television in the fruit stand, reciting the shards of the tale that lodged in his memory. A Cubano broke out of Glades Correctional. He ran for years. Then he was caught. And finally, he was proved innocent. There must be more to the story, but it was enough for the fruit man. He pushed the mango across the counter. On the house. Boquete protested. The fruit man insisted.

    By Feb. 6, 1985, the night he fled prison, Orlando Boquete, 30 years old, had already spent two years behind bars for a sexual assault and burglary he had nothing to do with, the victim of a victim who mistook him for the man who climbed in her window. Ahead of him, as far as the eye could see, were mountains of time: five decades.

    He bolted.

    Of the 194 people exonerated by DNA tests since 1989, only Orlando Boquete undid society's mistake by fleeing. And he kept undoing it: over the next decade, he was in police custody again and again, only to vanish in a forest of identities that were false, borrowed and stolen. His prison break was the start of a decadelong journey of near-disaster and daring inches, with no money, no home, no name — but with good looks, charm and a quick mind. Craving family and a bed to call his own, Boquete instead found refuge in an underworld of outlaws. "I did certain things that I had to do," he said. "To survive. But I never, never harmed anyone."

    He would appear at family gatherings, enchanting the children in stolen moments when he again became, without worry, Orlando Boquete. Then he would quietly slip behind the mask of fugitive life. (A niece, Danay Rodriguez, remembers her parents coming home with a flier that showed her tío Orlando as one of the state's most wanted men — a mistake, the grown-ups assured her.) He held dozens of jobs, legal and illegal; at times, he worked as legitimately as someone with a fake name could. Other times, he worked por la izquierda, on the left — meaning, he said, under the table.

    He had always been good at running. Boquete (pronounced bo-KETT-eh) boarded a shrimp boat in the port of Mariel, Cuba, in 1980, when he was 25, leaving behind one son, two marriages, a career as a diesel mechanic in Havana and a jail record as a Cuban Army deserter — this last credential essential, he believed, to helping him clear bureaucratic hurdles for departing Cuba. He joined 125,000 Cubans, known as Marielitos, who formed an extraordinary exodus that year, when Fidel Castro felt pressure from a poor economy and allowed them to leave.

    For two years, Boquete led a life that was pretty much on the level. He worked construction, then in Cafetería La Palma in Miami's Little Havana and later as clerk in a convenience store on the midnight-to-dawn, no-one-else-will-do-it, armed-robbery shift. By June 1982, Boquete was living with an uncle in a trailer in Key West, hoping for work as a commercial fisherman along the archipelago.

    On June 25, with the summer heat at full blast, he had a cousin shave his head of thick black hair, leaving only a mustache. That night, various Boquetes later testified, they sat in the trailer, watching baseball and the World Cup from Spain. Afterward, they strolled to a Tom Thumb convenience store for cigarettes and beer. As they approached, police officers asked them to wait in the parking lot. Another police car pulled up. Inside was a woman who had awoken from a sound sleep in her bed in the Stock Island apartments, a few blocks away, to find a man on top of her. He ejaculated on her bedclothes. He had no hair on his face, she said, and a buzz cut on his head. Another man lurked in the apartment with him, she said, but had not taken part in the assault. They grabbed a few items and left.

    From the police car, the victim saw Orlando Boquete and told the officer, "That's him." Although he had a prominent mustache, he was the only person in the vicinity with a shaved head. That single glimpse shaped Boquete's life for decades.

    Before trial, the prosecutors offered him a deal: plead guilty and give evidence against the other man who had broken into the apartment, and he would have to serve only one year in jail, followed by two years probation.

    On the witness stand, Boquete explained why he had declined. "If my freedom depends on my falsely stating that I'm a culprit or guilty," he said, "I would rather go to jail. I'm conscious of the fact that if the gentlemen of the jury and the ladies of the jury, if they vote against me, they are going to destroy my life, and I'm not afraid to stand here."

    Besides the alibi provided by his cousins and uncle, the defense seemed to hold one other card. A second man, Pablo Cazola, was arrested for the attack and pleaded guilty. He also signed an affidavit stating that Boquete was not his accomplice. But he refused to testify at trial. At the time, DNA testing — the ultimate proof of identity — had not yet been used in court. So the jury was left to weigh the eyewitness identification of a very confident victim, on the one hand, against the alibi of Boquete and his relatives, all of whom testified he had spent an evening watching television and drinking beer.

    It was January 1983, a particularly poor moment for a Marielito accused of a violent crime; there had been many fevered stories about their supposed rampant criminality. Convicted after brief deliberation, Boquete was sentenced to 50 years for the burglary and another five years for attempted sexual battery. The case was over and, so it seemed, was the life Orlando Boquete had sought in America. He was 28 years old.

    He moved into the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections with one treasured possession, he told me, passed along by an inmate he met in the county jail: a Spanish-language edition of "Papillon," the prison memoir that became a movie starring Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman. It is the account of Henri Charrière, who wrote — perhaps accurately, though some scholars are skeptical — of his many escapes from French penal colonies over the years.

    "This is a real book," Boquete told me. "He gives to you power. Esperanza. Hope."

    He set about adapting Charrière's lessons to his own life, finding principles and tactics that could transfer from penal colonies of the 1930s to a state prison in Florida in the mid-1980s. On one occasion, Charrière was undone by an informant. The lessons, by Boquete's light: study and silence. "Be patient if you want to escape from somewhere," Boquete said. "You have to be observant. Don't run your mouth."

    He studied the terrain. Two fences ran around Glades Correctional. The first was short, easily scalable. Between it and the second was a strip of boundary area, about 10 feet wide, mined with pressure detectors. A footstep would set off alarms. Beyond the boundary was the second fence, about 15 feet, with curls of razor wire running along the ledge. Guards watched from towers, but the pursuit of escapees was left to officers who circled the perimeter in a van, on a road just beyond the outer fence.

    A natural, compact athlete, Boquete ran every day, processing the details of prison life. Inmates occasionally were taken by a shotgun squad to work in sugar-cane fields near the prison. On one such excursion, Boquete saw a swampy irrigation canal, about 300 yards beyond the outer wall. It served as a moat, complete with resident snakes and alligators. This gave him pause. "Alligators have territory," he explained. "If they have babies over there, and you go there, you're in trouble."

    He made a pinpoint search for useful, secret-worthy inmates and found one man from the town of Belle Glade, who agreed to map the roads and landmarks. He was staked $30 by a Colombian inmate with ties to organized crime.

    Charrière wrote in "Papillon" of the ocean waters around Devil's Island, noting that every seventh wave slapped against the shore with greater strength than the ones that came before or after. Ultimately, he marshaled the power of a seventh wave to get clear of the island. At Glades, Boquete timed the orbit of the van, to see how long he would have from the moment he triggered the ground alarms until his pursuers could get back to him. About a minute, he figured.

    In "The Fugitive," a movie starring Harrison Ford, an innocent man on his way to death row seizes a chance to run for his life. In the unyielding reality of prison, innocent people often do the precise opposite of running. They dig in their heels. Many go before parole boards and refuse to apologize for "their" crimes, unwilling to offer themselves as exemplars of how the penitentiary really is a place of penance. In Pyrrhic glory, these innocent people prolong their incarceration by refusing to fake remorse for things they did not do, while the guilty quickly learn that the carrot of parole awaits those who muster the necessary show of contrition.

    Even if Boquete had been willing to profess regret for something he had not done, parole was years away. Still, running would inevitably land him in a purgatory of deception and evasion. Moreover, the law does not permit innocent people to flee prison any more than it permits them to resist arrest. The guards would be armed and ready to shoot.

    "I know that can happen," he reflected years later. "I don't care. If they kill me, anyway, I'm gone. I finish my sentence. I was ready, physically, mentally, spiritually. I don't be scared about nothing when I escaped. Only a little scared of alligators."

    The evening of Feb. 6, 1985, was miserable, wet and cold. Perfect. "Nobody likes to jump in the cold water," Boquete said of the guards. "Nobody wants to stay in the sugar-cane fields in the cold weather. The cold weather makes their job more difficult."

    Just before 8 p.m., as he sorted carrots on an assembly line, he caught the eye of George Wright, a 29-year-old man serving 75 years for robbery. Boquete said they had joined forces while jogging in the yard; Wright, who is back in prison and due to be paroled next month, has a somewhat different version of events but declined, through a relative, to be interviewed.

    They slipped outside, unnoticed, and walked past the prison's construction warehouse. They grabbed a door frame someone had left out for them to use in scaling the two fences, Boquete said, then pulled the frame with them over the first fence. Now they were on the pressure-alarmed land. The 60-second clock started running. They propped the frame against the tall fence, then scrambled up to the barbed wire summit. Boquete, who stands 5-foot-4, went first. He briefly got in the way of the 6-foot-4 Wright, who simply brushed past him.

    Once they hit the ground outside, they sprinted to the wide, swampy irrigation canal. They paused, caught their breaths. In the distance, they could hear the dogs. Boquete had steeled himself for this moment, but in his heart, had hoped that perhaps he would not have to get into the water. The advance of the dogs convinced him. They had no choice. They plunged ahead and never saw each other again.

    Soon, the baying of the hounds was joined by another sound: the beat of helicopter rotors. Boquete immersed himself, surfacing his nose for a gulp of air, seeing beams of a searchlight sweeping across the fields and water. The dogs barked. He had no religious upbringing but wore a crucifix on a chain around his neck, and he put the cross in his mouth to calm himself.

    He later guessed that he had been in the water two hours or so, most of it fully submerged, when he finally pulled himself, shivering, onto the bank of the canal. He crawled on his belly into a field, then dug a shallow burrow with his hands. He dropped into the hollow and covered himself with dirt and grass. He could hear his pursuers shout. He tried to lie still.

    Something pinched his face. Then one arm. Thousands of biting ants, resident in his hideout, swarmed over his skin. He shielded his eyes with his hands, and listened as the clatter of the search receded. Finally Boquete climbed out of the canal on the same bank that he went in, the prison side of the moat. His pursuers expanded their search but he had hardly gone any distance. As they moved on, he oriented himself, then half-crawled to an orange grove. He ate five oranges, slumped under a tree, ant-bitten, filthy, exhausted. He was quite happy. This grove was near railroad tracks, a less conspicuous route than the main road. The next stop was a sugar-cane field. There, he dug another hole, and after checking for ants, covered himself and slept.

    At daylight, he moved like a snake, belly-crawling short distances, cringing when the cane rustled or popped, then pausing to listen. With a small knife he peeled bits of the cane to eat.

    He was running for his life, but barely moving. After his second night in the fields, he saw farm workers nearby and realized he had lingered near the prison long enough. He crossed four more canals, the last so wide that he worried he would not make it to the other side. Finally, he reached the railroad tracks, picked up a stick and, bent like a hobo, followed the rails southwest toward Belle Glade.

    By late afternoon, he had emerged from the apron of farmland on the prison outskirts and came to Avenue L. Across the road, big trucks were lined up, leaving for everywhere; the map had shown a depot. In the escape of his imagination, he simply hopped a truck; as a tireless runner in the prison yard, he had not foreseen the toll of a slow-motion sprint. He was spent.

    Just east of the tracks was a pay phone. Surely, the authorities would be checking with all the relatives who had visited him. He dialed a cousin in Miami. She was shocked to hear his news; the family knew nothing of his escape. He proposed that she pick him up.

    She hesitated.

    "No, mi primo, no," she said. No, my cousin, no.

    He would stay clear, he told her; she should not worry, he said. "No se preocupe."

    He hung up.

    Just beyond the pay phone, a few Mexican migrants idled in front of shacks. The Belle Glade man had told him he might be able to take refuge with them.

    It was two full days since he had escaped from Glades Correctional Institution; he had risked getting maimed on razor wire, shot by guards, mauled by dogs, eaten by alligators, poisoned by snakes. It had taken every ounce of strength in his fleet, 30-year-old body to avoid those fates, and he had covered all of 1.2 miles. He was transformed: the innocent person, wrongly accused, now was an outlaw who could be shot on sight. He didn't care.

    "Oye, hermanos," Boquete called. "Necesito ayuda."

    Hey brothers, I need help.

    The Mexicans looked at the bedraggled specimen. Then one of them spoke, Boquete recalled.

    "He says, 'Why do you need help?' I said, 'I need help because I run from immigration.' "

    A day later, one of them asked the logical question: why was a Cuban running from immigration, since Cubans were never deported?

    "I tell them the truth. And they laugh, and said, 'Oh, that was you.' Because one of them got stopped the night I escaped. They heard the helicopters."

    He worked in the fields for two months, picked up every morning in a truck. Had anyone been looking for the fugitive in the first few days, it is possible that his swollen face would have been hard to recognize. By springtime, he and the migrants decided to pool their earnings and head for Miami. They bought a car for $800. It was mid-April, about 10 weeks after the breakout. Somewhere, Boquete had acquired an Army uniform. Raw as Boquete's English was, the Mexicans had none. He would drive.

    On the road south, a radiator hose burst. As Boquete patched it, a police car stopped. He spoke a phrase he had used often in the previous two years.

    "Yes, officer?" he said.

    What was going on, the cop wanted to know. Boquete explained about the radiator hose. "Be careful," the officer advised.

    He was. The Mexicans dropped him in Miami, near Little Havana.

    Though Boquete's escape was brave and harrowing, his flight does not particularly distinguish him. In the 1980s, the Florida prisons virtually leaked prisoners: 972 prisoners broke out the year Boquete ran, 1,234 the next year and 1,640 the year after. Most walked away from work crews. Prisoners also left in file cabinets, garbage trucks, dressed as women. From Glades, six murderers dug a tunnel from a chapel, a spectacular breakout that roused alarm and moved state officials to clamp down. The trick was not just getting out but staying out. After the initial burst of excited hunting around a prison, the pursuit of fugitives can be anemic; the search for Boquete and Wright lasted four hours. Prisoners are less often caught than found, unable to sustain endless caution in their affairs. Somewhere, they trip a bureaucratic circuit — they use or respond to their real name, are arrested for crimes much like those that brought them to prison or are bartered by someone else trying to get out of trouble. George Wright, who escaped with Boquete, avoided the authorities for a year and a half, then was caught in the Pacific Northwest.

    Boquete turned himself into a hermit crab, sheltered in identities abandoned or left by the dead, an endless scuttle. A résumé, pieced together from his memories and public records, traces a route of dizzying turns and determination.

    He worked in sugar-cane fields and danced in the Orange Bowl when Madonna came to perform "La Isla Bonita." He hauled food in the Florida Keys as a truck loader and sledgehammered into the wall of a clothing store in Miami as a burglar.

    He learned to ride a Jet Ski. He taught nieces and nephews to snorkel. He washed dishes in a New Jersey restaurant and ran errands for players in the underground economy of South Florida. One night, with cash in his pocket, he settled at the bar of a fancy hotel in North Miami and proclaimed that he was a boxing trainer who had just won a big bet on a Hector Camacho fight. He bought rounds of drinks for the house and met a real-estate woman from New York. They jogged together on the beach.

    All those years, he walked barefoot along a borderline as thin and treacherous as the blade of a knife, the boundary between tension and exhilaration, where freedom was just one unguarded moment — Hey, Orlando! Oye, Boquete! — from vanishing.

    He called himself Antonio and Eddie and Hilberto, dead or missing people whose Social Security numbers kept a pulse for a year or so after their demise. A half-dozen times, Boquete said, he was arrested while a fugitive: some of his benefactors left unfinished court business when they departed, and Boquete inherited their petty troubles: drunk-and-disorderly summonses, driving under the influence. He did a week here, 30 days there, he said. He also got into trouble of his own devising.

    Rolling his freshly sanded fingertips into police ink pads, he was not connected by the authorities to the man who owed five decades of time to the state. It was simple enough for him to do the short bits, not that he had much choice. In the early days of a six-month sentence, he simply walked away from a jail work crew, making him a fugitive under two identities.

    He agreed to take me back over some of the territory he had covered. We traveled through 300 miles of southern Florida, hunting for traces of the self he had worked to keep invisible.

    After his Mexican patrons dropped him off in Miami, he returned to Little Havana, a place he knew well. On one of his first days back, with nothing in his pockets, he followed an acquaintance to a utility room in an apartment complex. Someone was using the space to hoard stolen goods, and they found a boom box with detachable speakers. They sold it in three parts. He found a room in an apartment on Northwest Seventh Avenue and took a job at a grocery store, and anywhere else he could find work with no unanswerable questions asked.

    The 1980s were years of staggering opportunity and danger in that part of the world. South Florida was the loading ramp for the illegal-narcotics trade in the United States. The Miami River runs through Little Havana. "Lots of boats," Boquete said. "Lots of drugs." Some had been handled by a woman he knew as a child in Cuba. Around 1987, she was caught in a federal drug case and was being held in central Florida. She sent word back to Little Havana that she needed clothing, cigarettes and money. Boquete said he went along for the ride to prison, but others in the car balked at going inside, so he did. "I told the guard that everyone else was afraid to see her, I don't have ID, but I am her cousin," Boquete said. "They took the clothes." He relished the audacity of that visit. From the first moments of his escape, when he doubled back toward the prison, hiding in plain sight had proved both tactically shrewd and psychically satisfying.

    One of the people who helped him get by — the man who led Boquete to the boom box on his first day back — went on to prosper in the drug trade. On the condition that he be identified only as Ulises because of his own legal problems, the man spoke with wonder at Boquete's stamina, the new homes every few weeks. "He was not really involved in our group," Ulises told me. Still, there were many groups and plenty of mundane, if risky, work.

    "This guy, Kiki, asked me to hold a package for this guy who would come to my apartment that night," Boquete said, recalling one incident. Though he did not open it, he guessed that it was a kilogram of cocaine. That evening he heard a car pull up. From the window, he saw a uniformed police officer. In a panic, Boquete dialed his contact. "I tell him, 'The police are here!' " he said. "He said, 'That's right, just give him the package.' "

    Even innocent moments could turn harrowing. One night, he stayed at a friend's apartment after a party. In the morning, he washed dishes with the front door open. A figure appeared in the corner of his eye.

    "Hey, Boquete!" said the man.

    Boquete did not lift his gaze from the suds. The man — a uniformed police officer — stood in the doorway calling his name, and finally, Boquete asked what he wanted. A team of officers was on the scene, apparently tipped off to the presence of a fugitive. In a few minutes, all the Mexicans and Cubans in the building were lined up outside.

    "If you're looking for this Boquete, why don't you bring a picture of him?" Boquete said he demanded.

    Another man grumbled loudly about suing for some indeterminate civil rights violation, Boquete recalled, and the officers eventually withdrew.

    The encounter rattled him. To find some peace, he flew to Illinois in 1990 and got work in a Weber grill factory. He called himself Antonio Orlando Moralez, a real Marielito who was killed while Boquete was in prison. (The company, Weber-Stephen, does not have payroll records from that time and could not confirm his employment.) A cousin of Moralez's, who did not want to be named because of immigration concerns, said of Boquete, "He didn't do anything wrong, and he needed help, so I gave him my cousin's Social Security number for him to work under."

    The change relaxed Boquete; he did not feel himself under direct police scrutiny. After a year or so, though, worried about how long the Moralez identity would hold up, he moved again, back to Miami for a while, and then to Arizona. It was 1991; he'd been on the run for six years. He was starting to wear down. He returned to Miami, apathetic about being recaptured.

    "I was hanging out on the street," he said, meaning his living came from activities outside the law. One day, he and two other men broke into a clothing store. As they drove off with the loot, a police car followed. They tried to speed away and heaved stolen clothes out of the car, but were quickly caught. In the back of the car was the sledgehammer they used to enter the store. Boquete gave his name as Eduardo Jeres, and a judge put him on probation.

    At 37 years old, he had no checkbook, credit cards or bank accounts; he lived with his money, the cash hidden under the kitchen floor of an apartment on 27th Avenue. He welded bars on the windows and doors.

    For all that caution, he had not broken out of one prison just to live in another. He often dropped in on his family, went swimming with the children and doted on Danay Rodriguez, his half-brother's daughter. "He watched us when our parents went out," said Rodriguez, now 24, recalling that he would bring her the White Diamonds perfume she loved as a girl. To visit them was a heart splurge. They lived aboveground. He could not.

    In the summer of 1992, hungry for a quieter, more domestic life, he sent for a nephew, José Boquete, 12, then living in California, to stay with him in Miami while school was out. "I love him from when he was a baby, when he first came from Cuba," Boquete said. He had a son back in Cuba, not much older. The family trusted him, Boquete said.

    For José, it was a thrilling summer. He made friends in the apartment complex. His uncle indulged him and charmed the neighbors. "I made a best friend right away," José said. "My uncle had these parties, just barbecues, and people came to hang out. It was the greatest."

    One day in August, young José watched the canaries his uncle kept in a cage flapping their wings in agitation. The birds had detected the approach of Hurricane Andrew, soon to become the second-most-destructive storm in United States history.

    "I asked my uncle, 'What's happening?' He said, 'Don't worry about it, everything's O.K.,' " José recalled. "He just stayed there on the sofa."

    Behind his barred door, Boquete was content, unwilling to fight a storm. Afterward, with electricity knocked out for days, he rigged a line from a car battery into the apartment and even scavenged contraband ice.

    At the summer's end, José returned to California. His uncle looked for work: the hurricane was a boon to the construction trades, and Boquete found odd jobs at a small company, Fantasy Cabinets, which had contracts with police stations and jails, said Mercy Fleitas, who ran the business with her husband, Serafín.

    The Fleitas household knew Boquete as Loquito, the little crazy one, for the high-speed pace he kept at work and play. They did not realize that the wiry man was a fugitive. But Mercy Fleitas had a vivid memory of his anxiety about going into a correctional facility where they were doing work. And nearly 15 years later, hearing about his true identity and exoneration, Fleitas remembered a strong streak of decency.

    "You know what about him?" she said. "My husband's brother had died, and he couldn't do enough for the kids. He was always bringing them food."

    His life was far from tranquil. Tipped off by a trailer-park neighbor that he was "hot," Boquete drifted to North Carolina, settling in a rural area before returning again to Florida. At times, Boquete said, he craved to sleep with both eyes closed. To answer to his own name. Instead, over the next four years, he landed in police custody again and again.

    In March 1995, acting on a tip about a wanted man, the police came to an apartment where Boquete was staying under the name Hilberto Rodríguez. A gun was found, and he was sentenced to a year. He was assigned to a work crew to clean up around apartments for the elderly across from the Orange Bowl. When he spotted a pay phone in front of the stadium, he could not resist. He called Ulises, the friend who met him when he first returned to Little Havana — now a successful drug dealer — and when Ulises pulled up in a van, Boquete dropped his rake and got in.

    He stayed with Ulises and his wife in south Miami. Very early one morning in July 1995, Boquete left for his usual exercise routine in a local park: running and 600 sit-ups, beginning at 6 a.m., before the heat of the day. On the way, he was stopped by a drug-enforcement agent, who asked him if he lived there.

    No, he said, "I'm just visiting for a few days from Key West." The agents searched the house and found two pounds of marijuana. Ulises was away, on a trip to New Orleans with a girlfriend. That left his wife to answer for the pot. Suddenly, Boquete's status as a fugitive took on a high value. She did not know his real name but knew that he was on the run.

    As the officers sorted through his tangle of identities, they decided to process him as Hilberto Rodríguez, the fugitive who had walked away from the Orange Bowl work detail.

    "In the police station, the cops say, 'Let's go,' " Boquete recalled. "I am walking to the door. Then a lady sitting at a computer says: 'Hold on. Palm Beach has something on him, too.' " The Glades prison was in the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County. After 10 1/2 years, his fingerprints were linked to Orlando Boquete.

    Sentenced under the Hilberto Rodríguez pseudonym for escaping from the county jail, he was returned to the state prison system as Rodríguez, with "Orlando Bosquete" listed as an alias.

    After years of running from his true identity, it would turn out that proving who he really was would not be bad at all for Orlando Boquete. That, however, took another decade.

    During the 1990s, many prosecutors in Florida, and elsewhere, fiercely resisted DNA testing for people already in prison. Such tests often poked embarrassing holes in the original investigations. After an innocent man died on death row — the prosecutors opposed testing until the man, Frank Lee Smith, was terminally ill — the State Legislature passed a law that explicitly permitted convicts to seek DNA testing, as long as they asked by Oct. 1, 2003. More than 800 prisoners wrote to the Innocence Project of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York, which set up the Florida Innocence Initiative to manage the requests. As the deadline approached, Nina Morrison of the Innocence Project sent forms to Boquete and others, so that they could start the process without an attorney.

    With help from another inmate fluent in English, Boquete filed the paperwork. One day in the spring of 2006, Morrison called him: the test results proved he was not the man who had attacked the woman in Key West. He flushed his parole rejection papers down the toilet. Boquete now had a lawyer in Key West, Hal Schuhmacher, representing him, along with the Innocence Project's Morrison and Barry Scheck (with whom I wrote a book about wrongful convictions in 2000).

    Last May 23, Boquete was delivered in shackles to the county courthouse in Marathon for a hearing. At his request, Morrison brought him a white jacket and pants, 30 waist, for his appearance. His family gathered in the courtroom. The moment swelled with uncommon forces: liberation, vindication, resurrection, humility. "I could sit here and talk for as much time as anybody wanted to give me," the state's attorney, Mark Kohl, told the judge, "but every minute that I spend talking to you is another minute that an innocent man sits in jail on this charge."

    The judge, Richard Payne, made the same point. "No words spoken by this court today . . . would do justice to the penalty that you have been required to pay for offenses that now we know conclusively that you were not guilty of committing," he said. "You are hereby ordered to be immediately released from the custody of Florida."

    The state had measured the system against the case of Boquete and recognized its failure. Still, that would not be the end. The federal government, through the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, also took its measure of Boquete. While he had been legally admitted to the United States in 1980, he had never completed the application to gain permanent status. So instead of being freed at the moment he was declared innocent, Boquete was taken in handcuffs by immigration agents to a federal detention center.

    Yes, Boquete was cleared of the 1982 case. But had he proved himself a menace to society while on the run? Faced with a large question, immigration authorities seemed to use a microscope to answer it. The burglary of the clothing store and a gun found where he had been staying were "a concern with regard to his potential danger to the community," wrote Michael Rozes, the field office director for immigration enforcement in Miami. "An escape for which he was eventually convicted, regardless of the fact that this conviction has since been overturned, shows your client's propensity toward absconding."

    Prosecutors in two counties, Miami-Dade and Monroe, weighed in to urge that the immigration officials look beyond a rap sheet that, in Boquete's case, was singularly unilluminating.

    "Public employees exist to serve the public," Mark Kohl wrote. "If you cannot conclusively determine that he is a dangerous person, I urge you to release him at once so as to not compound the mistakes made 23 years ago."

    Finally, immigration officials released Boquete on Aug. 21, only after he signed papers conceding that he could be deported for his crimes as a fugitive.

    That night, he ate two croquetas and drank a batido de mamey at a quiet dinner with family members, his immigration lawyer, John Pratt, and another innocent Florida man, Luis Díaz, who served 26 years. He corrected what he said were misspellings of his name in official records as Bosquette or Bosquete. The next morning, he went for a run on the beach at 6 a.m. Through Hal Schuhmacher, he got a job doing landscape work for two real-estate agents in the Florida Keys, Morgan Hill and Paula Nardone, who gave him a place to stay. Once a month, he makes a four-hour trek by bus and train from Marathon to Miami, to report to immigration.

    A few weeks after his release, Boquete agreed to go with me on a trip back to the prison town of Belle Glade, along with his nephew José, now a musician living in Miami. In the prison parking lot, he squinted at the new buildings. He pointed out the perimeter road and the high fence. An officer told us to move.

    As we drove along Main Street in Belle Glade, he spotted Avenue L. "Turn here, this is where I saw the Mexicans," he commanded. We got out. Not surprisingly, no one remembered an ant-eaten hobo who suddenly appeared on a winter day 21 years earlier.

    Yet here were the simple landmarks of his story. He darted along Avenue L, running from one spot to the next. The railroad tracks that he followed away from the prison. A square patch of ground of faintly different hue than the surrounding area. "This is where the pay phone was," he shouted. He found the lot where he stayed with the Mexicans, but the migrants and their shacks were gone. In front of a deserted, sun-bleached wooden building, he said, "I think this might have been where the trucks were."

    Charged with memory, he looked back from age 52 on the 30-year-old who crawled out of canal waters and sugar cane to reclaim his life. The places were faded; the decades were mapped in the gullies and ravines that run through his face.

    What if he had not gone out for beer on that June night in 1982, at the very moment the police were looking for the man with the buzz cut?

    What would have come of his life?

    "Oh," Boquete said. "Oh. That's a real question. Too many beautiful things to do, I believe. Exactly what would have happened, I don't know. I believe I'd have gotten married, I'd have a little business, property, boat. I'm not talking only about material things.

    "Maybe I pass away already. I believe, if I am still alive, like I am now, I'd be much better. "

    His words, while true, suddenly ring in his ears as impolitic. "I've got people around me," he said, citing lawyers, benefactors, family.

    Then he paused. "In reality, I don't have nothing," he said. It has been 21 years since he last saw the spot where the railroad tracks met Avenue L — the crossroads of his life, the point where he passed from captivity to, well, what? Did he know actual freedom on the run?

    "Sometimes," he said, instantly. "Sometimes. When I have a party, when I have made money, when I feel good, when I got a nice place. It doesn't have to be a nice place — my own place. When I'm cold — when the police don't look for me.

    "I feel free many, many times. Why did I escape from prison? Because I want to be free. I want to feel free. I see the police, I don't be scared."

    We turn back toward the car. Then we see it: a sign on the wall of the abandoned wood building, paint-dimmed, the words still legible. "Glades Logistics, Truck Broker." All those years before, he might have jumped one of their trucks and gone wherever it took him. Instead, step by step, he made his own road, finally circling back. Orlando Boquete: walking, not running.

    Jim Dwyer, a reporter for The Times, is the author, with Kevin Flynn, of '102 Minutes: The Untold Story of the Fight to Survive Inside the Twin Towers."


    6:12 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit - Remove

    Cheney’s To-Do Lists

    Related

    Notes From a Cold War Case Dick Cheney's notes from 1975 concerning Seymour Hersh's New York Times article. (pdf) (source: National ArchivesSubmarmines of U.S. Stage Spy Missions Inside Soviet Waters," by Seymour Hersh, The New York Times, May 25, 1975 (pdf)

    Additional information and documents are available at the Frontline "News War" Web site.
    February 11, 2007
    The Press Patrol

    Cheney's To-Do Lists, Then and Now

    RETURNING to the White House after the Memorial Day weekend in 1975, the young aide Dick Cheney found himself handling a First Amendment showdown. The New York Times had published an article by Seymour M. Hersh about an espionage program, and the White House chief of staff, Donald H. Rumsfeld, was demanding action.

    Out came the yellow legal pad, and in his distinctively neat, deliberate hand, Mr. Cheney laid out the "problem," "goals" while addressing it, and "options." These last included "Start FBI investigation — with or w/o public announcement. As targets include NYT, Sy Hersh, potential gov't sources."

    Mr. Cheney's notes, now in the Gerald R. Ford presidential library, collected and synthesized the views of lawyers, diplomats, spies and military officials, but his own views shine through. He is hostile to the press and to Congress, insistent on the prerogatives of the executive branch and adamant about the importance of national security secrets.

    Fast forward three decades and that same handwriting appears on a copy of the Op-Ed article in The Times that set in motion events that led to the perjury trial of I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff.

    Then, as in 1975, Mr. Cheney played a central role in managing the White House's relationship with the press. It was not precisely the same, however. In 2003, for instance, Mr. Cheney was not protecting secrets but authorizing Mr. Libby to peddle them to Judith Miller, then a reporter for The Times, in an effort to counter the points made in the opinion article, according to Mr. Libby's grand jury testimony. But his combative relationship with the press and the goals that animate it have not changed.

    "He's had the same idea for the past 30 years," said Kathryn S. Olmsted, a history professor at the University of California at Davis, who wrote about the Cheney file in her 1996 book, "Challenging the Secret Government."

    "His philosophy is that the president and the vice president and the people around the president decide what's secret and what's not," she said. "They thought they had to aggressively go after the press and Congress to reclaim the powers the president lost in Watergate."

    The 1975 article by Mr. Hersh disclosed details about American submarines tapping into undersea Soviet communications. Among the goals Mr. Cheney methodically listed in considering a response were enforcement of the espionage laws, discouraging "the NYT and other publications from similar action," locating and prosecuting the people who leaked to The Times and demonstrating "the dangers to nat'l security which develop when investigations exceed the bounds of propriety."

    Mr. Cheney also sensed an opportunity. Congressional investigations of the C.I.A., including one by a select committee led by Senator Frank Church, were under way in the post-Watergate era.

    Under the heading "Broader ramifications," Mr. Cheney wrote: "Can we take advantage of it to bolster our position on the Church committee investigation? To point out the need for limits on the scope of the investigation?"

    More immediately, Mr. Cheney considered possible responses to the article. One was to "seek immediate indictments of NYT and Hersh." A second was to get a search warrant "to go after Hersh papers in his apt."

    Next to last: "Discuss informally w/ NYT."

    Last: "Do nothing."

    In the end, the administration pursued the last option, based largely on the advice of Attorney General Edward H. Levi.

    There were two fundamental reasons for that decision. First, the Soviets apparently did not read The Times. "The White House feared," Ms. Olmsted wrote in her book, "that any sort of government investigation would alert the Soviets to the importance of the story."

    Indeed, as Mr. Levi told President Ford, any legal action by the government "would put an official stamp of truth on the article."

    The second reason the government stood down had to do with its just having lost an effort to stop the publication of a classified history of the Vietnam War by The Times and The Washington Post, the Pentagon Papers case. Mr. Levi said he was wary of turning the Hersh matter into "a journalistic cause célèbre without securing any conviction on the merits."

    He also predicted that Mr. Hersh would "accept imprisonment for contempt" rather than name his sources.

    That prediction was correct, Mr. Hersh told the PBS program "Frontline," which interviewed him for "News War," a documentary series that has its premiere on Tuesday.

    "You can't trample the Constitution," Mr. Hersh said. "I'm going to scream and moan and be a hero, you know, and give more trouble than they would if they'd just left me alone, which is the same thing they did in this case."

    Ms. Miller did accept imprisonment for contempt, spending 85 days in jail to protect her source, Mr. Libby. Mr. Cheney has said little, but he is on Mr. Libby's witness list, and the defense begins its case tomorrow.


    Invitations

    February 11, 2007
    The Age of Dissonance

    Uninviting Invitations

    There it is. Addressed personally to you, but not quite glamorous looking enough to be a formal invitation. What could it be? Tada! It's a "Save the Date" notice.

    For many people, those three words inspire a gnashing of teeth and soul.

    My cousin Robert is a pretty relaxed lawyer who has a great sense of humor and lives in central Vermont. But when a "save the date" notice arrived in his mailbox last month for a party in honor of friends this June, he became incensed. All winter he waits for summer to come so he can spend weekends on his sailboat on Lake Champlain or the Hudson River.

    Then this piece of mail arrives.

    "It's invitation by intimidation," he said. "Instead of notifying you about an event the normal six weeks in advance, these save-the-date people feel compelled to impose on you six months in advance. Why do they do that?"

    Good question. Is it a lack of confidence that one invitation isn't enough and that you need to be held down by a head's up twice? Is it the sheer amount of events in this over-programmed and overly ambitious world, all vying for the precious time of every guest? Certainly anyone on the benefit-party hit list has seen as many save-the-date notices lately as credit card bills, often with checks to be written that are just as big.

    At least that's for the serious purpose of raising money for good causes.

    But does every wedding hold as much urgency for every single guest? What about 25th anniversary parties? Fortieth birthdays? Retirements? Showers? Is every celebration now due cause for declaring by early edict that a summer weekend must be given away in addition to a gift?

    "I just got one for a wedding in London in June," said Jamee Gregory, an author, columnist and popular figure on the New York social scene. "I already feel traumatized because I don't like to leave my garden on Long Island in June. When someone invites you that early, you can't just say you've already made plans to be in Capri at a friend's villa. It's too early for that, so it actually stops you from lying."

    So how did we get into this save-the-date overdrive anyway, when the latest editions of "Emily Post's Etiquette" and "Amy Vanderbilt's Complete Book of Etiquette" still advise that even the most formal of invitations go out only six weeks in advance?

    Marcy Blum, a New York party planner who wrote "Weddings for Dummies" with Laura Fisher Kaiser, has watched these save-the-date mailings go from rare to standard in just three years. Ms. Blum thinks it's because weddings that used to take place in one afternoon or evening have expanded into full weekends, often in destinations that require advance travel booking.

    "If you're having a party where most of your friends and family are nearby, sending a save-the-date is preposterous," she said. "On the other hand, now that people think their parties are the be all and end all of everything, what else can you expect?"

    Of course, there are plenty of occasions when you wouldn't want to miss an event. And there are times when getting some notice well in advance is helpful.

    The other day my sister-in-law, Janet, informed me that I should save a date in April 2008 for my nephew's bar mitzvah and lunch to follow at the Central Park Boathouse. I'm delighted to know about it. But where do I write it down? My diary only runs through next January. And here is another question: Given the recent global warming reports, might it be a little early to assume the facility will still be above ground at that time?

    "So you'll wear hip boots like they do in Venice," said Janet, who, by the way, once received a save-the-date for a birthday party nine months in advance.

    "I thought it was bizarre," she said. "But hey, whatever floats your boat."

    Which brings us back to my cousin Robert and his beloved sailboat. What is he going to do about the save-the-date he received for that party six months away?

    "My wife doesn't want to be unpleasant, so I'm going to have to go," he said. "But at least now I'll have the pleasure of going with a reason to be unhappy."

    Nothing like some bubbling resentment to go with your choice of salmon or chicken.


     

    A Paparazzo?Celebrities Smile

    Greg Scaffidi for The New York Times

    Johnny Nunez at the Baby Phat fashion show.

    February 11, 2007

    A Paparazzo? Celebrities Smile and Say 'Friend'

    JOHNNY NUÑEZ hadn't slept in nearly 18 hours, but there he was backstage at the Baby Phat fashion show on Feb. 2, whizzing about Roseland like someone who had just inhaled a six-pack of Red Bull. His ever-present camera — an $11,000 Canon — hung dutifully on his right shoulder, as his eyes scanned the room for celebrities.

    "Tonight's going to be big," Mr. Nuñez said, "because everyone comes out to this event."

    Moments later, Russell Simmons, the music mogul, sauntered over and shook his hand. "Russell, can I get a shot of you and Kimora," Mr. Nuñez asked, gesturing at Kimora Lee Simmons, Mr. Simmons's estranged wife and Baby Phat's designer. Mr. Simmons happily obliged, posing with Mrs. Simmons cheek to cheek.

    "Johnny has a great eye and he's everywhere all the time," Mr. Simmons said. "You can't go to a party and not see Johnny." That thought would be echoed throughout the evening.

    "When I see Johnny, I feel like I'm seeing an old friend," said Ice-T, who gave Mr. Nuñez a hug when he approached. "He's a real cool cat and everybody, and I mean everybody, knows Mr. Nuñez."

    Affection is rarely heard for the paparazzi who stalk the stars. But Mr. Nuñez, 35, is not a typical paparazzo, though his photos are sold through a news service and appear in newspapers and magazines.

    In the 10 years he has been taking pictures of celebrities, he has used his charm and his tenacity to work his way into the very seam of the hip-hop world. And one more trait has won him their esteem: He won't take a photograph that shows them in an unflattering light.

    At a time when photographers seem intent on capturing photos of celebrities in compromising positions — starlets without panties, veterans with cellulite — Mr. Nuñez is not interested in destroying illusions. He has become as known for the pictures he won't take as for those he does.

    "There's a tendency for photographers to try and get the unflattering shots, to try and catch you at an awkward moment," Vivica A. Fox, the actress, said at the Baby Phat after-party at Cipriani 23nd Street. "Johnny gives you time to get yourself together. He's not interested in making you look crazy."

    With his pose-and-smile style, he is no Annie Leibovitz. He does not capture personas or create moments. He takes snapshots. But that approach has brought him what many other celebrity photographers do not have: access.

    "He's hip-hop's Patrick McMullan," said Emil Wilbekin, former editor-in-chief of Vibe magazine. Like Mr. McMullan, who in a 25-year career has captured significant moments in the worlds of society and Hollywood, Mr. Nuñez and his camera have been witnesses to many of the major private and public events in hip-hop.

    "Hip-hop is based on trust and these guys know that Johnny's not interested in humiliating them and that's why they like having him around," said Norma Augenblick, who before becoming director of special events at Cipriani spent seven years as Puff Daddy's executive assistant. "For a long time, Johnny was the only photographer allowed in Puffy's events."

    In the coming weeks, Mr. Nuñez will shoot more than 40 events, including Clive Davis's annual Grammy pre-party, Magic Johnson's charity pool tournament in Las Vegas and the Mary J. Blige Oscar party.

    "He's one of our top five most connected photographers," said Josh Tang, president of Wire Image, the photo agency with more than 2,500 contributors. "People ask for him specifically all the time."

    Beyond his photography, he is featured as a model in campaigns for the urban lines LRG and Phat Farm (a giant photo of him in a Phat Farm polo shirt hangs in Macy's). Next month, he'll be seen alongside artists like Fat Joe and Young Jeezy in Def Jam: Icon, a video game in which he battles fledgling artists and superstars.

    "Ludacris could use your help bypassing a paparazzi named Nuñez who won't leave him alone," the instructions in one round read. "Find this guy and deal with him."

    Mr. Nuñez's character delivers roundhouse kicks and body blows and says lines that are unprintable in this newspaper. "It's so cool," Mr. Nuñez said, grinning.

    LAUREN WIRTZER, vice president of marketing at Def Jam, said including Mr. Nuñez in the game was, "a no-brainer." "He's as important a character in this world as the artists," she said. The difference between the game and real life is, "no one wants to beat up Johnny; they want him around."

    Mr. Nuñez knows how to ingratiate himself with the behind-the-scenes players too. Every Valentine's Day, he takes roses to the women at BET, said Marcy Polanco, director of corporate communications at the network.

    "And it's not just the women in top positions," she said. "Every woman gets a flower."

    Mr. Nuñez was sitting with Ms. Polanco backstage at "106 and Park," BET's answer to MTV's "TRL." He had just finished shooting the duo Gnarls Barkley ("they're my favorite group right now," he said) and was doling out trinkets from gift bags he had received earlier in the afternoon. One woman walked away with perfume and NV diet pills — "not that you need them," Mr. Nuñez told her. Another received a scented candle.

    "These people help me pay my rent and keep my lights on," he said, "so I've got to reciprocate the kindness."

    Mr. Nuñez's career took off when Damon Dash, a founder of Rocafella Records, hired him as his personal photographer in 2002. He traveled the world with Mr. Dash — Cannes, Ireland, South Africa, Milan.

    "I'm calling my boys back home like 'Yo, I'm on a yacht in the middle of the Mediterranean with Kid Rock, Tyson Beckford and Playmates,' " he recalled. "I knew God was going to bless me, but I didn't know it'd be like that."

    It wasn't always a party. One late night in Paris, a gang attacked Mr. Dash and his entourage. "Everybody else ran," said Mr. Dash. "Johnny was the only who stayed and fought with me. That said a lot about his character."

    Mr. McMullan said Mr. Nuñez's willingness to mingle with some of hip-hop's more unsavory elements explains part of his appeal. "Some of those parties are little rough," he said. "You have to have real dedication to work that scene and Johnny is dedicated."

    Mr. Wilbekin said: "He will jump over tables and knock down bodyguards to get that money shot," — the one he will see in InStyle, Us Weekly or The New York Times (which has purchased Mr. Nuñez's shots through his agency).

    "One year at Clive Davis's pre-Grammy dinner he was literally climbing on top of tables to get pictures of Jennifer Lopez and Puffy," Mr. Wilbekin said. "I've been at parties and he'll drag me across the room to pose next to a complete stranger. 'Uh, hello, nice to meet you, Terrence Howard. Smile.' It's a little unorthodox, but he gets that shot."

    Not everyone welcomes Mr. Nuñez. For many publicists he is a threat to their control over their clients. "Sometimes he won't stop taking pictures until you tell him to go away, and that can be really annoying," said one music industry publicist, who asked to not be identified because his clients like the photographer.

    A Puerto Rican family adopted Mr. Nuñez, whose biological parents are from Venezuela and Trinidad, as an infant, he said. He was often teased for wearing hand-me-down clothes and Fayva knockoffs of designer sneakers, he said. "I vowed that no one would ever laugh at the way I dressed when I got older," said Mr. Nuñez, who likes to mix his Phat Farm with Prada and Valentino.

    After graduating from Suffolk Community College, Mr. Nuñez had no idea what he wanted to do with his life. One morning, after months of delivering pizza and chicken, he had an epiphany. "Hip-hop greeting cards," he said. "That's the reason why I even began taking pictures."

    To raise money for his card business, "I went to anything and everything," he said. "Album release parties, birthdays, artist showcases."

    Mr. Nuñez is now working on a coffee-table book and plans to donate part of the proceeds to charities for the blind. "God gave me the ability to see, and I've been fortunate enough to make a career out of what I see," he said. "It's only right that I help those who are less fortunate."

    He paused for a moment. An idea for a photo came to mind: a blind girl feeling Kanye West's face. "If that's not a hot picture," Mr. Nuñez said, "I don't know what is."


     

     

    Allan Tannenbaum/Polaris

    On Jan. 20, a retired New York City police officer, Cesar A. Borja, 52, lay surrounded by his family at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Manhattan. He died three days later. More Photos >

    Polaris

    Officer Cesar A. Borja, who died of lung disease last month, became a symbol for ailing ground zero workers, but there is little evidence to confirm accounts of his story. More Photos »

    February 13, 2007

    Weeks After a Death, Twists in Some 9/11 Details

    For days, a New York City police officer, Cesar A. Borja, who died of lung disease last month, was held up as a symbol of the medical crisis affecting the thousands of emergency personnel and construction workers who labored on the smoking remains of the fallen World Trade Center after the 9/11 attack.

    The Daily News published an article describing how Officer Borja had rushed to the trade center site after the twin towers fell, breathing in clouds of toxic dust that seared his lungs, and how he had chosen not to wear protective gear because the federal government had declared the air safe.

    Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton wrote to President Bush seeking more federal money to care for the workers and citing Officer Borja's months of "16-hour shifts" at the disaster site. The priest at his funeral in Queens pointed out that Officer Borja had worked as a volunteer in the recovery and cleanup efforts.

    It was a powerful story, one that brought the officer's eloquent son to the State of the Union address in Washington on Jan. 23, the day of his father's death. The son later met with President Bush, and afterward Mr. Bush, in discussing more aid for rescue workers, said he was eager to see money directed to "first responders," those first on the scene in the days and weeks after the attacks. "If they were on that pile and if they were first responders, they need to get help," he said.

    It turns out, though, that very few of the most dramatic aspects of Officer Borja's powerful story appear to be fully accurate. Government records and detailed interviews with Officer Borja's family indicate that he did not rush to the disaster site, and that he did not work a formal shift there until late December 2001, after substantial parts of the site had been cleared and the fire in the remaining pile had been declared out.

    Officer Borja worked traffic and security posts on the streets around the site, according to his own memo book, and there is no record of his working 16 hours in a shift. He worked a total of 17 days, according to his records, and did not work as a volunteer there. He signed up for the traffic duty, his wife said, at least in part as a way to increase his overtime earnings as he prepared to retire.

    "It's not true," Eva R. Borja, the officer's wife, said of the Daily News account of his rushing there shortly after the collapse of the trade center. In two extensive interviews, Mrs. Borja displayed her husband's memo book, where he kept detailed notes about his work across his career. The first entry for working at ground zero is Dec. 24, 2001. Almost all the rest come in February, March and April 2002, five or more months after the attacks.

    Mrs. Borja said she still believed her husband was sickened in his work around the site. Shown his father's memo book, Ceasar Borja, who had become something of a spokesman for ailing 9/11 workers, said it was the first time he understood what his father had actually done. "They kept saying my dad's a first responder," he said of the newspaper accounts. "I honestly never knew if he was a first responder." Asked why he had not corrected the seemingly erroneous or unconfirmed public accounts, he said, "The reason I never tried to correct that impression is I never knew the truth of whether my father was there or not. It was always a mystery for me. I never thought of correcting them because I honestly believed it myself."

    It is hard to determine precisely how the apparent misinformation about Mr. Borja's work at ground zero came to be reflected in newspapers, as well as in television and radio broadcasts. The family says it was not the source of the claims about working on the smoking pile. A spokeswoman for The Daily News insisted the paper had never explicitly said Officer Borja had rushed there soon after Sept. 11, only that at some point he had rushed there. Despite a number of articles and editorials that referred to him working amid the rubble and within a cloud of glass and concrete, she said the paper never actually reported his arriving there before December.

    The spokeswoman, Jennifer Mauer, continued to maintain that Officer Borja had worked "200 hours on the pile."

    Other newspaper accounts repeated the account of Officer Borja's work on the rubble without attributing it to anyone.

    Mrs. Borja and her son said that The New York Times was the first newspaper to ask them for documents showing Officer Borja's actual duties at ground zero.

    Doctors and coroners may yet draw a connection between Officer Borja's death and his more limited duties around ground zero. A city autopsy is under way. Experts say his illness, diagnosed as pulmonary fibrosis, is a rare and little-understood disease, which, depending on a variety of factors — genetics, for instance — can conceivably be caused by modest exposure to certain toxic substances or pollutants.

    Then again, doctors may find that Officer Borja, who spent much of his police career at a tow pound in Queens, had other, pre-existing problems. His family says that he smoked a pack of cigarettes a day for years before giving it up around the mid-1990s.

    Officer Borja's son said that it was possible his father had gone down to ground zero as a volunteer at some point soon after the disaster, but that his father had never mentioned it, and he had no evidence of it. He said several police officers had approached him at his father's wake and told him they recalled seeing his father on the pile, but he did not know their names.

    The Police Department said informal rosters had been kept at ground zero in the first weeks after the attacks including the names of officers who showed up to work. But the department said it could not easily retrieve the records. The department had no other comment about Officer Borja, who did not officially die in the line of duty and retired with a regular service pension.

    But when Officer Borja, who was seriously ill by 2005, filed paperwork with the city seeking an enhanced pension, he made no mention of any work before December 2001.

    An Emotional Fight

    Officer Borja's death came amid an unfolding and emotional fight over the health of ground zero workers and the role of city, state and federal officials in caring for those who might have been sickened by their work in and around the site. A federal lawsuit has been filed on behalf of hundreds of workers, whose lawyers say they are sick and in some cases dying because of their exposure to dangerous pollutants. That suit charges that the city and federal government failed to protect them from exposure. (The Borjas said they had no plans to sue.)

    The city's Law Department, which declined to comment for this article, has said drawing connections between 9/11 work and subsequent health problems has to be judged case by case. Congress set aside $75 million in 2005 for monitoring and treating 9/11 workers, and the White House agreed to add another $25 million last month. In a September study, Mount Sinai Medical Center found that roughly 70 percent of nearly 10,000 workers it tested from 2002 to 2004 reported that they had new or substantially worsened respiratory problems while or after working at ground zero.

    It was into that charged environment that Officer Borja's case came to light. Officer Borja, who retired in June 2003, became very sick in 2005, and was admitted to Mount Sinai in December 2006. He was determined to be suffering from pulmonary fibrosis and in need of a lung transplant to save his life, officials have said.

    The family, according to Mrs. Borja, reached out to the press. A Manhattan newspaper, The Filipino Reporter, published an article on Jan. 5 saying that Officer Borja had been assigned to security duty immediately after Sept. 11, and that he had done that work for months. It cited 16-hour shifts, and it quoted one family member as saying that Officer Borja had believed the air to be safe.

    Officer Borja's son, according to his mother, e-mailed other newspapers, as well. The Daily News responded. Throughout January, The News and other papers published numerous articles on Officer Borja's case. The News, which has mounted a campaign of stinging editorials on behalf of those believed to have been sickened at ground zero, eventually paid for Ceasar Borja, 21, to fly to Washington and back for the State of the Union address.

    The son said he had been prepared to drive, but accepted the offer. "The Daily News comped me," Ceasar said. The Daily News spokeswoman said the paper was proud to have paid for the young man's trip.

    The initial accounts are full of dramatic details: The Daily News of Jan. 16 said Officer Borja "volunteered to work months of 16-hour shifts in the rubble, breathing in clouds of toxic dust." That same article added: "Borja was working at an NYPD auto pound in Queens when the twin towers fell. He rushed to ground zero and started working long days there."

    Some of those claims were repeated in other stories in The Daily News and other papers, in both news articles and editorials. Sometimes the articles said Officer Borja had worked 14-hour shifts. Some identified him as having worked on the pile, and one Daily News editorial said he had "labored in the pulverized concrete, glass and smoke that formed a cloud over the rubble."

    The New York Times published one full article on Officer Borja, after he died at 52 on the evening of the State of the Union address. The article said he had become sick after working at ground zero. It said federal officials had agreed to pay for the officer's medical care as a reflection of their belief that his illness was connected to his work at ground zero.

    Politicians quickly began to speak out about the case, and the larger question of 9/11 health issues. Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of Manhattan, who has made 9/11 health a focus of her efforts for years, said of Officer Borja: "If his death does not convince the president to come up with a plan to deal with this medical crisis and fund medical monitoring and treatment, I don't know what else will."

    'A Hero' to Clinton

    Senator Clinton sent a letter to President Bush. It cited "many months" of Officer Borja's 16-hour shifts at ground zero, and it stated: "Cesar Borja was a hero who served his country in her hour of need and sacrificed dearly for that service. Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, as Cesar's health deteriorated, he and his family endured a great deal of hardship but never lost sight of the needs of the other workers, volunteers, first responders, and victims who survived the attacks but did not survive unharmed."

    The praise extended to Officer Borja's funeral on Jan. 27 at St. Josaphat's Church in Queens. The Rev. Thomas C. Machalski, who celebrated the funeral Mass, said he never discussed the details of the officer's work at ground zero with his family before speaking, and relied on press accounts when he referred to his having served as a volunteer. In fact, he said he thought the officer was, "already retired when he went back to work at ground zero."

    The fifth of 12 children, Cesar Ante Borja was born on June 30, 1954, in Polangui, a city in the Bicol region of the Philippines. The son of a farmer, he came to the United States in 1976. He joined the Army, and Army records show he was an active-duty soldier for four years, and was eventually discharged from the Army Reserve in 1983 with the rank of specialist.

    He married Eva in 1982, and he soon joined the Department of Correction. He became a police officer in 1987. He served first in the 109th Precinct in Queens before settling in to many years of work in the property clerk's office and at the tow pound. There he earned a reputation for diligent work and exemplary attendance. Mrs. Borja said he liked the short commute to the pound from their home in Bayside, Queens, and the idea that he could retire from the city after 20 years with a sizable pension.

    "He was the type who wouldn't complain," she said of her husband. "Or maybe he didn't like it, and just didn't say. He would adjust to whatever situation."

    On 9/11, Officer Borja reported for duty at the tow pound, records show. Over the next several months, there is nothing in his memo book recording any work, assigned or volunteer, at ground zero. Mrs. Borja remembers him mentioning being briefly posted in Brooklyn, near ground zero, shortly after the attacks.

    Interviews with several friends, relatives and officers who worked with him at the tow pound failed to turn up anyone who worked with him at ground zero before the end of 2001.

    Mrs. Borja said that her husband began to see the appeal of overtime pay for working shifts near ground zero late in 2001. He was close to retiring, and realized he might be able to improve his pension with the overtime hours. She said he even called his nephew, a fellow officer, to encourage him to put in for the overtime shifts, as well. Mrs. Borja said the nephew declined.

    And so Officer Borja reported on Dec. 24, 2001. The fires at the site, which had been burning for months, had been declared extinguished on Dec. 19. Considerable progress had been made in cleaning up the site.

    Officer Borja's log book makes clear where he worked during what would be 12-hour, 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. shifts: On Jan. 21, 2002, he worked at Albany and Washington Streets, three blocks south of ground zero. He worked several shifts elsewhere in Manhattan during the World Economic Forum. Then, he was back at Fulton Street and Broadway on Feb. 4, 2002. Ten of his shifts came in March or April.

    Three years later, Officer Borja became seriously ill. But in January 2006, when he filed a notice of participation — a document required to enhance his pension under a 2005 state law allowing city workers who labored at ground zero to be declared disabled — he was modest about his duty: he listed eight shifts around ground zero.

    On Dec. 19, 2006, he entered Mount Sinai, and soon he was near death. Mount Sinai's records indicate he listed his first shifts around ground zero as starting in December 2001, although there is a reference to him working 72 days there. There is no additional information about that notation, but the Borja family does not contend he ever worked 72 days at or around the site.

    Mrs. Borja, asked to explain how all the differing reports appeared in the press, suggested that things had simply spiraled out of control. "When I would read it, I would say, 'Why did they put that there?' " she said. She said she was too distracted caring for her husband and handling his funeral to correct the record.

    An Emerging Role

    Ceasar, though, played a very prominent role. He spoke with Mrs. Clinton at an event at ground zero. He went to the State of the Union address. He later met with President Bush in Manhattan. Articles variously quote him talking about how his father died as a public servant and saying that heroes should be looked after.

    "That was my first, inaugural speech as a political activist, which I never expected," he said yesterday. "I was just there expressing my emotions. I didn't know any facts. I was just speaking from the heart, and everything took off from there."

    At one point during those hectic days, the son put on his father's pea coat. One newspaper account said the son had suggested it was the uniform his father wore on Sept. 11. Ceasar, in an interview yesterday, denied having said that.

    But he did address a gathering of family and friends in Queens after the State of the Union address.

    "I made everyone in the U.S. know who Cesar Borja is, what he did for this country, and what he did for the city of New York," he was quoted as saying in The New York Post. "He is the symbol of the World Trade Center, and 9/11 and New York."

    Aides to Mrs. Clinton issued a short statement when told of the apparent discrepancies. "She knows that sacrifices were made by so many, whether it was in the hours, days, weeks or months after the attacks of Sept. 11, and believes that they all deserve our help."

    Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, would not talk about the details of the Borja case. He said the president respected the officer and his son and all who worked at ground zero.

    "Ceasar Borja is someone who loved and cared for his father, and his father was a hero from what we know of New York law enforcement and his work at the World Trade Center," Mr. Fratto said. "It is almost beside the point what the specific details were."

    Officials at Mount Sinai said in a statement: "The fact that Mr. Borja worked there for many days (and nights) provided ample opportunity for exposure to dusts."

    Finally, Ceasar Borja, after having absorbed the implications of his father's records, said he was no less proud. "I'm actually happy to know he wasn't on the pile," he said, adding that those who were must be in even graver shape. He concluded: "I don't believe my father to be any less heroic than I previously thought, any less valiant than the other papers previously misreported on."

    Alain Delaquérière, Sandra Jamison and Carolyn Wilder contributed research.


     

    Neal Pollack's Alternadad.

    Neal Pollack's Alternadad.

    Pop Culture
    Neal Pollack's Alternadad.
    By Michael Agger
    Posted Monday, Feb. 12, 2007, at 2:18 PM E.T.

    The trend came into the world naked, innocent, screaming. It demanded attention and round-the-clock care. In just two years, it grew and became more self-aware. Some people thought the trend was cute, others were simply annoyed. Yes, the daddy blog has accomplished much in its young life—scoured the world for Bauhaus children's furniture, discovered vintage R.E.M. Sesame Street appearances—but with the publication of Neal Pollack's Alternadad, the cuddly stage is officially over. The trend has grown into a book, and a target. The "alternadad" threatens to become the new "soccer mom," a vague sociological category that people have strong, unwarranted opinions about. The kid-free are already annoyed, the boomers sniff "been there, done that," and the "new urban parent" site Babble stokes the debate. But Pollack shouldn't simply be lumped in with a spurious hipster parenting movement. His book reveals that the core aim of fatherhood has barely budged: provide food, clothing, shelter.

    Most people know Pollack as an arch McSweeney's ironist, the self-proclaimed "greatest writer in the world" who satirized men's magazine writing and journalistic machismo with a Hunter S. Thompson alter ego. Saddled with this rep, Alternadad makes a bad first impression—with its title and the rubber duckie sporting a nose ring on the cover. The idea of a father writing a parenting memoir is also faintly shameful, since men bypass pregnancy, labor, and breast-feeding—the Bermuda Triangle into which many women's lives temporarily disappear. Pollack acknowledges this: "[W]hether you're a dad or not a dad, your life stays basically the same. It's just a matter of increased responsibility." His book is in earnest; it's Pollack unplugged. And despite his overdetermined musical taste, Pollack is not really an alternadad. He's a newly uptight, first-time dad.

    The actual alternadads appear in the book's opening section. Pollack describes the life he led in Rogers Park, a Chicago neighborhood that in the early '90s was neither hip nor scary, and so was filled with bona fide slackers. Pollack wrote a story for the alternative weekly in which he followed Jill, a journalism student, and her older boyfriend, Ned, a shiftless depressive, through birth classes and an actual birth. Ned had already fathered a child in his hometown, and he wanted to "be a real dad" to this new child. Their son is born, and six months later Ned is not around much and acting as spacey as ever. Jill takes the child to be with her dad in Montana. Although Pollack never explicitly states this, his own dadly path charts a middle way between the emotional and economic failure of Ned and the comfortable, conventional success of his own father.

    Pollack embarks into parent-land from a different starting point than those two. Like many men of his generation and class, he marries a woman with similar ambitions. Regina is an artist and teacher. They both partook of the extended American adolescence, and their "artsy-fartsy" life together is fun, filled with concerts and road trips. Their marriage has an ungendered, unscripted equality. They do what they want. Slowly, Regina leads Neal down the road to reproduction. Unlike a lot of dad writing, Pollack describes a critical stage: the hazy confusion of the "should we get pregnant?" time and the gray period once the seed is sown. Women's lives change at conception (and even before), but men have a nine-month grace period when they awake to the old-fashioned bread-winning commitment they still feel. Pollack describes this economic awakening through conversations with Regina. Note how he captures the drastic mindset of the newly pregnant—and note too that they're not talking about whether to buy a Bugaboo:

    "Maybe we shouldn't live in the city."

    "I was thinking the same thing," she said. "But I don't not want to live in the city. We should at least live in some city, somewhere."

    "I feel guilty."

    "Why? You don't owe anything to Philadelphia."

    "Yeah, but I made a commitment …"

    "Do you want to honor your abstract commitment that no one cares about but you?" she said. "Or do you want your child stepping on a needle in the park?"

    "So where should we raise our child?"

    "I don't know."

    Perhaps, we realized, we should have thought this detail through a bit more carefully. Life's learning curve, once you get pregnant, is steep and immediate.

    So, here is our "alternadad," wrapped up in a most traditional parental concern, the "good neighborhood" question. Pollack spends a lot time searching for the "good school" and the "good health care." And, while I'm making the book sound like an op-ed, it's actually very funny. Pollack wades through the indignities of contemporary dad-dom, which include: the aerobic cheerfulness of Little Gym, "helpful" people in the supermarket, odious "Is he walking?" comparisons, the gateway drug Noggin, rude playground moms, and the inescapable paranoia of Internet message boards. But these sorts of developmental and kid-culture issues (which can dominate any media or writing about parenting) are a sideline to Alternadad's central anxieties of where to live manageably and how to support a child.

    Pollack and Regina leave Philly and resettle in Austin, Texas. Pollack has been amenable to the whole kid thing but wants to pursue his writing career, and, after all, how's everyone going to eat? This is where feminism, previously confined to the safety of college campuses, comes roaring into their lives. Eli is born (in harrowing fashion). He gets older and requires more care. Pollack and Regina, both self-employed, divide the day into "Mommy Time" and "Daddy Time" for watching Eli. You can guess who wins. Pollack writes: "Initially Daddy Time was from three to five p.m. on weekdays, with longer shifts on the weekend. Some days, that was fine. But on other days, three p.m. would nearly arrive and I'd realize that I'd been sitting in my underwear at the computer all day but that I hadn't actually written anything." Daddy Time (a sweet deal already!) gets extended. Pollack doesn't pull his weight, yet unlike his predecessors, he's made to feel both guilty and annoyed. Guilty for not parenting. Annoyed because he earns most of the money, and Dad's schedule should trump Mom's.

    What's fallen away from marriage for artist-intellectual-professional types are the traditional genders and gender roles. But, as new moms have been observing for years, the arrival of a child has a nasty way of reinstating the old dynamic. Pollack, who feels the need to make money and provide a safe place to live, is among the first to relate the re-emergence of breadwinner angst among men. (Although he fights this pressure by smoking pot and forming a rock band.) Regina is divided by wanting space for her artistic ambitions and her feelings of being a "bad mother." Parenthood, which looks from the outside like a step into maturity, is actually a descent into a new set of insecurities. Including renewed tension with your parents, who are often willing to overlook a funky wedding ceremony but want to see you step in with tradition and/or religion when a grandchild appears. An infamous chapter in Alternadad details the three-way gunfight among Neal, Regina, and Neal's Jewish parents over whether Eli should be circumcised.

    What Alternadad drives home is that having children has become more of a lifestyle choice, with "Dad" and "Mom" seeming like an identity along the lines of "med student" or "poet." As a result, there is a lot more anxiety about parenting—unlike the mythic good old days, where you had kids, tossed them into the back of the Pinto, enrolled them in public school, and didn't worry about things too much. The trappings of the alternadad—the T-shirts, the stubble—actually express a nostalgic wish for the old style, a time when parents had lives that weren't totally consumed (and infantilized) by care for their kids. As Alternadad shows, the attentive scorched-earth parenthood of today may be tiring, but it's not life-altering: Pollack is a dad, and he is still self-absorbed, distracted, and judgmental.

    The anger surrounding alternadad and hipster parenting derives from the idea that these new parents don't want to "grow up" and act like parents. Instead, they give their kids fauxhawks and inculcate them with a precious taste in music and "film." I agree that this can be irritating, but find me the set of parents who haven't, consciously or not, indoctrinated their kids into a little family cult. And who's more annoying: the 3-year-old who knows Mandarin or the one who loves Devo? The difference between an alternadad, a banker dad, and a soccer dad is ultimately aesthetic and pointless. Sure, Pollack is psyched when Eli develops a love of the Ramones and Spider-Man, but most of his book recounts his struggle to find what America used to offer easily: a solid house, a living wage, a decent public school.

    Michael Agger is a Slate associate editor. You can reach him at michael.agger@gmail.com.

     

     

    No New Nukes
    By Daniel Politi
    Posted Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2007, at 5:12 AM E.T.

    The New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times lead, while the Wall Street Journal tops its world-wide newsbox, with word that negotiators from six countries reached a tentative agreement that could be the first step in getting North Korea to dismantle its nuclear program. Under terms of the agreement, which wasn't released but the papers all have sources, North Korea would be given energy assistance and aid in exchange for the closing down of its nuclear reactor at Yongbyon and readmitting nuclear inspectors into the country. Discussions about North Korea's existing nuclear weapons and fuel would be left for a later date.

    USA Today leads with a new poll that reveals 63 percent of Americans want troops to leave Iraq by the end of 2008. Also, 57 percent want Congress to put a cap on the number of troops that are sent to fight in Iraq but 58 percent oppose denying funding for these additional troops. By 51 percent to 19 percent those surveyed place the blame on Republicans for the Senate stalemate. Lawmakers should take note, because approximately 70 percent of those surveyed said votes on the war will affect their choice in the next congressional election.

    Everybody notes any agreement with North Korea should be met with some skepticism because the country has changed its mind in the past, and leader Kim Jong-il still has to give his blessing. While the LAT reports that most of the aid would come from South Korea and Japan, the NYT says South Korea, China, and the United States would be responsible, meaning President Bush would have to get congressional approval.

    Although negotiators in Beijing were optimistic, not everyone was happy. Republican hawks have never liked the idea of compromise with North Korea. Everyone quotes former U.N. ambassador John R. Bolton, who said, "This is a very bad deal" because, among other things, "it makes the administration look very weak." The Post notes that Democrats in Washington are likely to criticize the administration for allowing North Korea to get nuclear weapons in the first place. The WSJ points out the agreement will almost certainly be criticized by those who will say "Bush is getting essentially the same deal Clinton got in 1994."

    Yesterday, the NYT led with what it said was the apparent collapse of the North Korea talks. Everyone mentions the talks appeared to be at a standstill and the agreement was only reached after marathon talks (16 hours, according to some accounts). But doesn't the NYT owe its readers some sort of explanation, or at least acknowledgment, of how it got the main story in yesterday's paper wrong? Besides a brief mention of how "negotiations had appeared near collapse on Sunday," and mention of a "shift" in the headline, it's as if yesterday's story never happened. Regardless, the NYT has the most complete coverage of the intricacies in the agreement.

    All the papers front or reefer the four bombs detonated at two predominantly Shiite markets in central Baghdad that killed approximately 70 people (the LAT fronts a particularly harrowing picture). The attack came on the same day the Iraqi government and Shiites across the country marked the one-year anniversary (according to the Islamic lunar calendar) of the bombing that destroyed one of the holiest sites for Shiites, the mosque in Samarra.

    Both the NYT and LAT front stories of last year's bombing in Samarra. The NYT focuses on how the sacred Shiite shrine has not been rebuilt, and in fact, most of the rubble still remains. The LAT mentions the rubble but goes deeper and provides an interesting look at the bombing itself and the aftermath, describing in detail the great significance the event still holds for many Iraqis. The LAT says the bombing was "the dawn of Iraq's civil war." That echoes the views expressed by President Bush when he presented his plan to send more troops to Iraq, but is it the whole story? No one doubts the bombing was significant, but as McClatchy detailed in an analysis piece last month, "the president's account understates by at least 15 months when Shiite death squads began targeting Sunni politicians and clerics. It also ignores the role that Iranian-backed Shiite groups had in death squad activities before the Samarra bombing."

    Several prominent Washington journalists testified yesterday that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby never mentioned Valerie Plame to them even though they had conversations with him shortly before her identity was made public. Everyone notes the Post's Walter Pincus had a surprise revelation yesterday when he testified that Ari Fleischer told him about Plame. The statement contradicts the former White House press secretary's testimony. "It seems possible prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald would have had an easier time finding out who in the administration didn't leak Plame's identity," says the Post's Dana Milbank.

    Most of the papers catch news out of Salt Lake City, where a man opened fire in a shopping mall last night, killing five people and injuring several more before he was killed.

    In preparation for the debate that is scheduled to begin today in the House, Democrats unveiled a simple resolution that only has two clauses. The nonbinding resolution declares opposition to President Bush's plan to send more troops to Iraq, while also expressing support for U.S. troops on the ground. There will be three days of debate on the war, and a vote is expected on Friday.

    Funny 'cause it's true … In an editorial about the Grammy sweep by the Dixie Chicks, the NYT focuses on the consequences the group faced after their lead singer, Natalie Maines, criticized Bush at a concert in London. "Had Ms. Maines been a senator at the time, she might be a shoo-in candidate for president," says the NYT.

    Daniel Politi writes "Today's Papers" for Slate. He can be reached at

     

    Monday, February 12, 2007

    COMMENT Too Many Chiefs




    COMMENT
    TOO MANY CHIEFS
    by Hendrik Hertzberg
    Issue of 2007-02-19
     
    Posted 2007-02-12

    According to some of the calendars and appointment books floating around this office, Monday, February 19th, is Presidents' Day. Others say it's President's Day. Still others opt for Presidents Day. Which is it? The bouncing apostrophe bespeaks a certain uncertainty. President's Day suggests that only one holder of the nation's supreme magistracy is being commemorated—presumably the first. Presidents' Day hints at more than one, most likely the Sage of Mount Vernon plus Abraham Lincoln, generally agreed to be the greatest of them all. And Presidents Day, apostropheless, implies a promiscuous celebration of all forty-two—Jefferson but also Pierce, F.D.R. but also Buchanan, Truman but also Harding. To say nothing of the incumbent, of whom, perhaps, the less said the better.

    So which is it? Trick question. The answer, strictly speaking, is none of the above. Ever since 1968, when, in one of the last gasps of Great Society reformism, holidays were rejiggered to create more three-day weekends, federal law has decreed the third Monday in February to be Washington's Birthday. And Presidents'/'s/s Day? According to Prologue, the magazine of the National Archives, it was a local department-store promotion that went national when retailers discovered that, mysteriously, generic Presidents clear more inventory than particular ones, even the Father of His Country. Now everybody thinks it's official, but it's not. (Note to Fox News: could be a War on Washington's Birthday angle here, similar to the War on Christmas. Over to you, Bill.)

    Just to add to the Presidential confusion, Washington's Birthday is not Washington's birthday. George Washington was born either on February 11, 1731 (according to the old-style Julian calendar, still in use at the time), or on February 22, 1732 (according to the Gregorian calendar, adopted in 1752 throughout the British Empire). Under no circumstances, therefore, can Washington's birthday fall on Washington's Birthday, a.k.a. Presidents Day, which, being the third Monday of the month, can occur only between the 15th and the 21st. Lincoln's birthday, February 12th, doesn't make it through the Presidents Day window, either. Nor do the natal days of our other two February Presidents, William Henry Harrison (born on the 6th) and Ronald Reagan (the 9th). A fine mess!

    Here is the question thus raised: at this chastening juncture in our republic's history, wouldn't everyone welcome a moratorium on Presidential glorification? Isn't the United States a little too President-ridden, much as post-medieval Spain was a little too priest-ridden? Our capital city groans under the weight of obelisks, equestrian statues, and grandiose temples fit for the gods but devoted to the winners of Presidential elections. "Presidential historians" populate the greenrooms of our cable-news networks. Presidential suites sit atop Vegas hotels. Presidential libraries gobble up ever-growing swathes of urban and, as the unhappy faculty of Southern Methodist University recently learned, campus real estate. Time to throttle down.

    A good place to start, after securing the retailers' and calendar-makers' agreement to call Washington's Birthday by its true name (if not its true date), would be with the most sacred object our society mass-produces: money. At the moment, of the seven denominations of banknotes in general circulation, no fewer than five have Presidents on them, ranging chronologically from Washington (who would have frowned on the honor, as smacking of monarchy) to Grant (who would have appreciated the irony, given that he was habitually broke and presided over an Administration rife with financial scandals). The two others are the ten-spot (Alexander Hamilton, who might have been President if he hadn't been a duellist) and the hundred (Benjamin Franklin). On the coins, it's pretty much Presidents all the way, except for Susan B. Anthony and Sacagawea, who are on dollar coins that barely circulate and are obvious affirmative-action benchwarmers, destined for the hook once a female President or two comes along, or even sooner. Beginning this year, the Mint plans to roll out new circulating dollar coins, four different ones a year, for as many years as it takes. Who will be on them? Why, Presidents, of course—all of them, in the order they served, scoundrels and heroes alike. Someday, like a bad penny, a George W. Bush dollar will turn up. Heads you lose.

    As it happens, a federal district court has ordered the Treasury to redesign our paper money to make it friendlier to blind people. Why not take the opportunity to go further than changing sizes or adding texture? Franklin shows the way. Yes, he was a politician, but he was equally or more famous as a scientist, a diplomat, a newspaperman, an aphorist, a satirist, and a boulevardier. Let's keep Washington on the single, and then let's start printing bills with pictures of the other sorts of people that make us proud to be Americans. With rotating portraits, we can have a musicians' fin (Foster, Gershwin, Ellington), a scribblers' sawbuck (Twain, Melville, Dickinson), a performing-arts twenty (Caruso, Keaton, Balanchine), a secular saints' fifty (Douglass, Jane Addams, King), and a scientists' C-note (Franklin, Edison, Einstein). As a three-fer (President, saint, writer), Lincoln could have the two-dollar note all to himself. A three-spot could be introduced, with Whitman ("What you give me I cheerfully accept,/A little sustenance, a hut and garden, a little money, as I rendezvous with my poems"). As with Presidents, a decent interval would be required. The Dylan fiver will have to be deferred until another decade of the sixties rolls around.

    One can dream. Meanwhile, if you think you're sick of Presidents, wait till you see the parade of Presidents-in-waiting. Wait? You don't have to wait. Decision 2008 is already upon us, full-bore. A generation or two ago, political scientists used to complain that American campaigns dragged on for eight or nine months, in contrast to the three to six weeks that is normal elsewhere. Those were the days. As of last week, ten Republicans and nine Democrats, all of them plausible enough to claim a place in televised debates, have either filed formal exploratory committees or declared their candidacies outright, and another half-dozen or so are on the verge. The first such debate is ten weeks from now—even though the first primary is nearly a year away, the conventions don't convene for a year and a half, and the election itself is twenty-one long months down the road. Unsurprisingly, as the Washington Post reported last week, 2008 is fated to be "the nation's first billion-dollar presidential campaign." No doubt "the issues" will get a full airing, but, more than ever, it's going to be all about the Benjamins, and not just who gets his picture on the

     

     

    Justin Steele for The New York Times

    Jeff Zucker, to be named chief of NBC Universal, must chart a new direction for the company as the digital revolution disrupts the media.

    February 6, 2007

    A New Boss at NBC, and Even Newer Issues

    When Jeff Zucker is named the new chief executive of NBC Universal today, succeeding Bob Wright, he will be completing one of the most spectacular ascents of any recent media executive: from part-time sports researcher in 1986 to corporate C.E.O two decades later.

    And now for the hard part.

    According to NBC executives, Hollywood producers and agents, and many of the financial analysts who follow NBC, Mr. Zucker, 41, faces many pressing issues. Foremost among them: how he will deal with the rapid technological and financial changes that are throwing many traditional media businesses into upheaval. He will also have to choose a team of executives to back his efforts as he sets a new direction for the company.

    Mr. Zucker will answer questions about his supporting cast today shortly after he is formally named C.E.O., a senior NBC executive said yesterday.

    Mr. Zucker is leaving the job he currently holds, president of the NBC Universal Television Group, but no one will be named to fill that job, the NBC executive said.

    But Mr. Zucker is expected to elevate three other senior NBC executives, effectively dividing many of his current responsibilities among them.

    Marc Graboff, who is now president of NBC Universal Television West Coast, will be given added supervisory duties over NBC's entertainment division in California. Beth Comstock, who is president of NBC's digital and marketing division, and Jeff Gaspin, who heads up the company's cable operations, will also take on new responsibilities.

    Another important NBC West Coast executive, Kevin Reilly, is in talks to extend his contract as president of NBC's entertainment division.

    The most urgent questions facing Mr. Zucker relate to the digital revolution now roiling the media marketplace.

    Bill Simon, senior client partner for the global entertainment division of Korn/Ferry International, an executive search firm, said the arrival of digital outlets for television programs had made what was formerly a simple equation for NBC much harder.

    "It comes down to this," Mr. Simon said. "He has to figure out how to grab an audience, how to hold an audience and how to monetize an audience."

    All three jobs will be harder with the advent of Internet sites like YouTube that offer television programming, including shows from NBC, with little financial gain for the networks.

    Nicholas P. Heymann, an analyst at Prudential Securities who follows General Electric, NBC's parent company, said that Mr. Zucker's task is threefold: he has to continue to create successful programming while also cutting costs in the TV business and elsewhere.

    At the same time, Mr. Zucker is charged with trying to figure out what the next disruptive digital media outlet like YouTube will be, and how the company can capitalize on it.

    Given the complexity of the task, Mr. Heymann said it made sense for Jeffrey R. Immelt, the chairman of G.E., to select as Mr. Wright's successor someone who was brought up in the G.E. management ranks. Mr. Zucker has some blemishes on his track record — NBC's slide in prime time among them — but he has shown recent success.

    Compared with hiring an executive from the outside, Mr. Heymann described Mr. Zucker's hiring as having "the potential to be the lowest-risk alternative with the most potential for upside and success."

    In the near term, Mr. Heymann said, G.E.'s challenge is to return NBC Universal's earnings to the peak levels they achieved in 2003.

    The media company recently reported an increase in earnings for the quarter ended Dec. 31 to $841 million, from $801 million the previous year. It was the first year-over-year profit increase for NBC Universal in five quarters.

    The challenges facing Mr. Zucker have little to do with the current state of NBC, which, some detractors notwithstanding, is mainly solid across almost all of its divisions.

    Under Mr. Wright, the company has expanded with great success in recent years, adding the Universal movie studio and highly profitable cable channels like USA and Bravo. Until the last couple of years, NBC under Mr. Wright was among the most profitable divisions of G.E.

    NBC has been the network leader in news and late-night programs, but trails the other networks in prime time.

    One of the downturns for the company occurred on Mr. Zucker's watch when he ran the network's entertainment division in California. NBC fell from first place to last in prime time in 2004, just after Mr. Zucker finished his run as president of NBC Entertainment.

    Some of collapse of the network's prime-time fortunes had to do with NBC's long-term failure to develop new programs. Mr. Zucker was credited with maintaining NBC's success much longer than might have been expected, given the dearth of hits, because of his ability to manage NBC's remaining assets, like the comedy "Friends."

    Twice he managed to keep that show on the air (in high-cost negotiations) when it was expected to finish production.

    But competitors in Hollywood — and some critics in the press — have pointed to those struggles and asked why Mr. Zucker was not held more responsible for them. Mr. Zucker mainly put his head down, focused on NBC's more successful cable channels and tried to change the momentum at the network.

    Now, thanks to new hits like "The Office" and "Heroes," NBC's prime-time lineup has begun to show some improvement.

    Longer term, NBC will have to show that it can continue to create hit entertainment content, its chief source of profit. Recent signs have been favorable in that area, according to some of NBC's most prominent producers, and Mr. Zucker's relationship with the Hollywood community, once thought to be strained, has been shored up.

    Dick Wolf, who has been NBC Universal's most important producer for a generation because of his "Law & Order" dramas, said in a telephone interview, "I think Jeff will get a very strong endorsement from the community."

    He said misperceptions of NBC had been rife in recent years. "You would think from reading some accounts that this was a company literally going down the tubes," Mr. Wolf said. "For a company going out of business, it seems to me NBC is generating a lot of cash."

    He said he favored the selection of Mr. Zucker not just because of their friendship but also because "he's just a really smart guy, and people know I like really smart guys."

    That view was echoed by Ben Silverman, who has become one of NBC's biggest suppliers of programs, with shows like "The Office" and "The Biggest Loser." Yesterday NBC announced it had signed a new deal with Mr. Silverman that will give the company first access to all the programs his company develops.

    Mr. Silverman noted that Mr. Zucker took pains to make sure the deal was announced as his personal decision, to underscore his Hollywood credentials.

    "The guy makes decisions," Mr. Silverman said. "Sometimes that ruffles feathers in an industry that likes to be coddled, but as a producer I like that kind of transparency."

    Richard Siklos contributed reporting.


     

     

    February 6, 2007

    3 Deaths May Put Focus on Elevators' Hardware

    The deaths of three men who plunged down elevator shafts over the weekend underscore a danger that experts say is not widely recognized in a city of more than 50,000 elevators: a door can come unhinged from its bottom tracks, leaving a sudden gaping hole over an empty shaft.

    "It usually results from horseplay," Patrick A. Carrajat, an elevator consultant from Queens, said yesterday. "If two people push violently up and out against a door, it can come off the track."

    That was what apparently led to the three weekend fatalities, one at a nightclub in Chelsea and two at the Lefrak City apartment complex in Queens. In both cases, the men who fell to their deaths were scuffling or fighting when they were shoved or banged into closed elevator doors that appeared to be in normal working condition.

    The deaths seemed likely to renew a longstanding dispute over how far the city should go in requiring security hardware on all elevator doors.

    In particular, the City Department of Buildings is recommending that the owners of all buildings install stabilizing brackets known as Z-bars on the inside of each elevator door. The devices, already required in public housing and new doors in other buildings, are intended to prevent the bottom of the door from being pushed in.

    "The law does not mandate building owners to update old hoistway doors," said Kate Lindquist, a Buildings Department spokeswoman.

    A hoistway door is the one that opens onto each floor, and is not attached to the elevator cab.

    She said the department, which is reviewing the city building code, could recommend that it be updated to require Z-bars citywide. "This is certainly something we are considering," she said.

    Even if the hardware were required, however, it is not clear that it would prevent accidents like the ones in Chelsea and Queens. The elevator doors that gave way had both been fitted with Z-bars, according to the Buildings Department.

    Although the brackets can improve safety, Mr. Carrajat and Ms. Lindquist said, they cannot prevent every accident, as evidenced by the three fatalities. They also pointed out that other flaws, including improper installation of doors, can render the brackets ineffective. While the Buildings Department is investigating the doors' failure, any proposal to mandate the brackets is likely to be resisted by the real estate industry.

    "I would have to look at the big issue of whether you can really do it," said Marolyn Davenport, senior vice president of the Real Estate Board of New York. "Can you make it a requirement that you retrofit every door if they don't have the appropriate tracks?"

    Charles Mehlman, senior vice president of the Mid-State Management Corporation, which maintains the 20-building Lefrak City complex in Corona, said, "This was just a tragic accident, and I know of no device that would have prevented it." The building where the two men fell is an 18-story red brick tower at 96-04 57th Avenue.

    Mr. Mehlman said yesterday that elevator cameras had captured images of the two men who died riding to the 11th floor, where they got out, then fell into another of the building's three elevator shafts.

    "They were fighting violently on the way up, and you have to assume they continued fighting on the 11th floor before they broke through the door," he said.

    The police identified the men as half-brothers, Julian Jones 25, of Queens, and Leslie Jones Jr., 23, of Brooklyn. Neither man lived at Lefrak City, and it was unclear yesterday why they were there early Saturday morning, Mr. Mehlman said, when the accident took place.

    Mr. Mehlman said the two men fell about 4 a.m. on Saturday, but their bodies were not discovered until more than 30 hours later, on Sunday afternoon. In the intervening hours, the building's three elevators continued to function normally, even though building engineers were called to the 11th floor on Sunday morning after residents discovered that one hoistway door had been pushed off its tracks.

    The fatality in Chelsea took place early Saturday after a fight broke out in the BED nightclub. The police said the man who died, Orlando Valle, 35, had been shoved into the elevator door by an employee of the club, Granville Adams.

    Mr. Adams, a 43-year-old actor who had appeared in the television show "Oz," was charged with criminally negligent homicide.

    City records of violations and inspections of both elevators reveal nothing exceptional. Ms. Lindquist said the owner of the Queens building had been cited recently for two elevator violations, dirty conditions, in April 2005 and January 2006. In both cases, the violations were corrected, she said.

    She said the owners of the building that houses the nightclub BED, at 530 West 27th Street in Chelsea, had been issued a permit to renovate its elevator in November 2004, and that an inspection in June had determined that the completed work was up to code.


     

     

     

    February 6, 2007
    Editorial

    The Price of Corn

    The current price of corn is $3.23 a bushel, more than half again what it was a year ago, and beginning to bring to mind the record $5.545 a bushel set in July 1996.

    There are many reasons for this price spurt. The ethanol boom has created a sharp new demand for corn. The Department of Agriculture revised its estimate of the 2006 corn harvest downward by some 200 million bushels because of weather and other factors. There is also a smaller corn reserve on hand than usual — the smallest in a decade — which parallels shortages around the world.

    Add to this the growing weight of commodities funds investing in agricultural markets, and you have daydreams — or nightmares — of that $5 mark.

    Yet all this has taken place against the backdrop of three record harvests in a row, a sure sign of how strong the ethanol appetite for corn production is turning out to be. It's tempting to assume that the effect of sharply higher prices is confined primarily to the agricultural sector. But where corn is concerned, we are all part of the agricultural sector. The historical cheapness of corn has driven it into nearly every aspect of our economy, in the form, most familiarly, of corn syrup. The low price of corn over the past half-century lies at the very foundation of America's historically (and unrealistically) low food prices.

    Gratifying our two major appetites — cheap food and cheap gas — used to seem easy because both corn and oil were abundant. Cheap oil helped keep corn prices low because it cost farmers less to run their tractors and combines.

    But we are entering a new dynamic now. While there has been talk recently about refining ethanol from sources other than corn, that could take a while. So at the moment what we are trying to do is gratify those appetites from the same resource: agricultural land. No matter how high prices go, what will need to change isn't the amount of corn acreage available or even the size of the enormous harvests we are already getting. What will need to change is the size of our appetites.


     

     

    February 6, 2007
    Editorial

    A Vaccine to Save Women's Lives

    Congratulations to Texas for becoming the first state to require vaccinating young schoolgirls — ages 11 and 12 — against a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer and genital warts. Other states would be wise to follow the same path.

    There is no doubt that Merck's vaccine against the human papillomavirus, given in three shots over eight months, is highly effective. It provides nearly perfect protection against two strains that cause 70 percent of all cases of cervical cancer, and against two other strains that cause 90 percent of genital warts cases. (That still leaves 30 percent of the cervical cancer cases to worry about, so women are urged to keep getting regular Pap tests to screen for signs of the cancer.) The side effects are generally mild: pain or tenderness at the site of the injection.

    Many parents are appalled at the notion of vaccinating such young girls against a sexually transmitted disease. But the medical reality is that the vaccine will generally not work after a woman has been infected, so it is best for girls to be vaccinated well before they become sexually active. The nation's top advisory committee of immunization experts has recommended that the vaccine be routinely given to girls 11 and 12 years old.

    The most contentious issue is whether the shots should be required or simply recommended to parents through a strong educational campaign. Those opposed to compulsory vaccination complain that there are already a slew of required vaccinations, so why heap on another, especially for a disease that is spread only through sexual contact? Critics also fear that HPV vaccination may lead some students to wrongly assume that they are protected against all sexually transmitted diseases, perhaps encouraging them to engage in risky behavior.

    None of these objections seem strong enough to forgo the protection against a devastating disease. The United States records some 10,000 new cases of cervical cancer each year, and 3,700 cervical cancer deaths. Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, a conservative Republican, has taken an "opt out" approach, in which vaccination is required but parents can seek an exemption for reasons of conscience or religious beliefs.

    That makes sense to us. All students deserve protection against HPV infection, and the presumption should be that they will get it.


     

     

    Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

    The newspaper columnist Robert D. Novak leaving Federal District Court in Washington after testifying in the trial of I. Lewis Libby Jr.

    February 12, 2007

    Novak Says Libby Didn't Leak Agent's Name to Him

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 12 — The newspaper columnist Robert D. Novak testified today that two high officials in the Bush administration told him the identity of a C.I.A. agent whose unmasking touched off a scandal, but that Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby Jr., did not.

    Mr. Novak recalled in Federal District Court how former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and the White House political adviser Karl Rove told him the identity of the covert agent, Valerie Wilson. But, Mr. Novak said, "I got no help or no confirmation from Mr. Libby on that issue."

    Nor was Mr. Armitage helpful early on, Mr. Novak said, recalling how Mr. Armitage refused his requests for an interview again and again. "He just didn't want to see me," Mr. Novak said.

    But finally Mr. Armitage relented, confirming the agent's identity in a one-on-one interview on July 8, 2003, Mr. Novak said. A day later, Mr. Novak said, Mr. Rove provided additional confirmation.

    Mr. Novak was one of several well-known Washington journalists who were called to the stand by the defense today. In addition to Mr. Novak, two others, Bob Woodward and Walter Pincus, both of The Washington Post, also testified that they learned of Ms. Wilson's identity from administration officials, but not from Mr. Libby. His defense is arguing that he was made a "scapegoat" by the White House to protect Mr. Rove.

    Mr. Novak's appearance at Mr. Libby's criminal trial was at once dramatic and anticlimactic, since the roles of Mr. Armitage and Mr. Rove have been known for many months. But the white-haired columnist, whose soft-spoken voice was markedly different from the confident tone he takes on television, provided insights into how news is gathered in the nation's capital.

    Mr. Libby is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice. Prosecutors maintain he tried to thwart an investigation into who leaked the name of Mrs. Wilson, whose husband, the former diplomat Joseph C. Wilson IV, had traveled to Africa to investigate rumors that Iraq had tried to obtain uranium from Niger.

    Some Bush administration critics have asserted that Mrs. Wilson was unmasked in retaliation against her husband, who wrote an Op-Ed article for The New York Times on July 6, 2003, that cast doubt on the uranium rumors and the administration's rationale for going to war against Iraq.

    Mr. Novak's column of July 14, 2003, first revealed to the public that Mr. Wilson's wife was "an agency operative" specializing in weapons of mass destruction.

    The columnist testified that in his July 8 meeting with Mr. Armitage, he wondered aloud why Mr. Wilson — who had served in the Clinton administration and had no wide experience in nuclear weapons as far as he knew — had been sent to Africa by the Central Intelligence Agency.

    "It was suggested by his wife, Valerie," Mr. Armitage replied, in Mr. Novak's telling. Mr. Armitage, who did not divulge her last name, went on to explain that she worked for the agency, the columnist related. Mr. Novak said he consulted Who's Who in America soon afterward and found the name "Valerie Plame" listed as Mr. Wilson's wife. ("Plame" was the agent's maiden name.)

    Mr. Novak said he talked to Mr. Rove on the phone the day after his meeting with Mr. Armitage and mentioned that he understood that Mr. Wilson's wife was a C.I.A. "operative," a term the columnist said he probably used too often.

    "Oh, you know about that too," Mr. Rove commented, in Mr. Novak's recollection. "I took that as confirmation," Mr. Novak said.

    The columnist said he did not realize when he disclosed Mrs. Wilson's agency role that she operated covertly.

    Mr. Novak said he had learned to read Mr. Rove's signals very well, since the White House aide was "a very good source" to whom he talked two or three times a week. Asked what he thought Mr. Rove's main job was, Mr. Novak said it was to aid the president politically.

    "I think he was trying to do a good job for the country, too," Mr. Novak said.

    Under questioning by Mr. Libby's lawyer Theodore V. Wells Jr., Mr. Novak said he finished writing the July 14 column on the morning of July 11, after which it was edited and distributed by his syndicate.

    Mr. Wells was apparently trying to show that the contents of the column might not have been a deep secret days before its publication. But under cross-examination from the prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, Mr. Novak said in effect that only a relatively small cadre of journalists could have seen the column ahead of time.

    Mr. Libby told investigators and a grand jury that the television journalist Tim Russert told him about Mrs. Wilson on July 10, 2003, an account that has been contradicted by several prosecution witnesses, including Mr. Russert and Ari Fleischer, the former White House spokesman. Mr. Fleischer testified that Mr. Libby told him about Mrs. Wilson on July 7, 2003, and that the information was "on the q.t."

    Mr. Novak's testimony followed an appearance on the witness stand by Mr. Woodward. He testified that Mr. Armitage disclosed Ms. Wilson's identity in June 2003, but that Mr. Libby knew nothing about the agent when Mr. Woodward talked to him two weeks later.

    Mr. Woodward, an assistant managing editor at The Washington Post who gained fame for his reporting of the Watergate scandal, recalled at Mr. Libby's criminal trial that Mr. Armitage told him about the agent in a telephone conversation laced with salty language.

    Mr. Woodward testified that he already knew, when he talked to Mr. Armitage on June 13, 2003, about the trip her husband took to Africa. Mr. Woodward said he asked Mr. Armitage how Mr. Wilson happened to go to Africa in the first place.

    "His wife works at the agency," Mr. Armitage replied, in an audiotape of the conversation between the two men that was played in court.

    "His wife's an (expletive deleted) analyst," Mr. Armitage went on, in a husky voice marked by chuckling. "How about that?"

    In contrast, Mr. Woodward said, Mr. Libby said nothing about Mr. Wilson's wife.

    Recalling his meeting with Mr. Libby on June 27, 2003, Mr. Woodword said he was sure he would have included a reference to such a disclosure in the voluminous notes he was compiling of his interviews for a book about the prelude to the Iraq war. There was no such reference, Mr. Woodward said.

    The defense is arguing that Mr. Libby was far too busy with weighty matters of state to keep track of conversations he may or may not have had about Mrs. Wilson, and that any inconsistencies in his accounts can be attributed to faulty memory.

    In Mr. Woodward's telling, and in the audiotapes, Mr. Armitage discussed the problems arising from Mr. Bush's State of the Union address in January 2003, in which the president alluded inaccurately to what British intelligence had found about Iraq's supposed attempts to acquire uranium — even though a presidential speech in Cincinnati some three months earlier was accurate on that point.

    The Cincinnati speech was "clean as a whistle," Mr. Armitage said, telling Mr. Woodward that George J. Tenet, then the head of the Central Intelligence Agency had managed to get the questionable references excised, only to have them resurface in January.


  • Today's Papers,Market Attacks in Baghdad,CNBC Anchor, 8 Days, 10 Feet

    8 Days, 10 Feet of Snow Still Not Done

    Sylwia Kapuscinski for The New York Times

    Workers tackling snowbanks around homes in Mexico, a community in Oswego County, N.Y.

    February 12, 2007

    8 Days, 10 Feet and the Snow Isn't Done Yet

    OSWEGO, N.Y., Feb. 11 — First the fire hydrants vanished. Then the tombstones. Then went the mailboxes, parked cars, front doors, stop signs and the bottoms of roadside billboards.

    By the time the snow stopped falling this weekend over Oswego County in upstate New York, the streets were lined with snowbanks that obscured anyone walking behind them, shoveling crews were charging upward of $200 an hour to clear the tops of houses, and gawkers were driving in from hours away.

    "This is the roof, right?" Mark Fahnestock, 27, asked his companion, Jessica Stiffler, 26, both of Lancaster, Pa., Sunday after he climbed a snowbank so tall that it merged with the roof of a church in Scriba. She took a photograph of him holding their 2-year-old daughter, Jazmine.

    They had left home at 5:30 a.m. "We don't get this kind of snow," Ms. Stiffler said.

    Oswego County, a rustic string of towns and villages on the southeastern rim of Lake Ontario, received 5 to 10 feet of snow over eight days. In one town, Redfield, the National Weather Service reported an unofficial total of 11 feet 8 inches, which would be a state record for snowfall from a single storm event. And the Weather Service said more snow was on the way.

    By contrast, the New York City record, set exactly one year ago today, was 26.9 inches as measured in Central Park.

    Life here took on an icy sort of absurdity. People posed for pictures on snowbanks as if they were atop Mount Everest. Someone turned a 25-foot mound of snow in the parking lot of Paul's Big M supermarket in Oswego into a billboard for their snow-blowing service. Someone else painted a different sort of message next to it: a declaration of love, from Brian to Brooke.

    A bouncer at Old City Hall bar in the city of Oswego cleared the steps outside by pouring salt from a beer pitcher. Workers at Novelis, an aluminum manufacturing plant, slept in an office to keep the factory running throughout the storm.

    Homeowners dug zigzag mazes to their back doors, to their cars, to their porches. Some were for business, others for pleasure.

    Tom Boney, 41, built one in his backyard to keep his three children entertained. "It's good to get out of the house," said Mr. Boney, who recently moved to Oswego from Wisconsin with his wife and children.

    Last week, Gov. Eliot Spitzer declared a state of emergency for the area, sending in extra road-clearing crews and other help, and most of the major thoroughfares had been cleared by Sunday. The authorities said there had been some injuries related to snow removal in the county, but no deaths.

    "We have, up to this point, considered ourselves very fortunate that the human-needs aspect has been minimal," said Patricia Egan, Oswego County's director of emergency management.

    Considering their geography and past history of storms, the cities and towns near Lake Ontario were not unprepared. Anthony Leotta, Oswego's longtime city engineer, said that its roads were built an average of about 50 percent wider than in other communities, to allow plows to navigate the streets easily and prevent snowbanks from stopping traffic.

    Some residents shrugged off the snow the way San Franciscans shrug off earthquakes. They recited inch totals of previous lake-effect storms with pride, often recalling some time when it snowed harder.

    Kevin Dwyer of Parish, who spent six hours carving a pathway to his back door out of five feet of snow, said he was not overly impressed by the storm. "This is the second-worst one," he said, comparing it unfavorably to one a few years ago.

    Still, the sheer quantity seemed to catch many others off guard. The State University of New York at Oswego, the alma mater of the television weatherman Al Roker and typically one of the last to give in to conditions, was forced to cancel classes for three days last week. "We don't know that we have ever done that," said Tim Nekritz, a college spokesman.

    Armed with shovels and the phone numbers of roof clearers who advertised high on the lampposts, people went to work, plowing, blowing, scooping, pushing. On Sunday, a seven-man crew from Ithaca removed the snow from the roof of a house in the village of Mexico. They charged $215 an hour, for a three-hour job.

    Others lent their labor. "Everybody pitches in," said Steve Canale, 53, owner of the Press Box bar and restaurant on First Street in Oswego. "If somebody drives by with a plow, they'll stop and help you."

    Restaurants, gas stations and supermarkets were doing a brisk business — slower than normal, merchants said, but steady.

    Dipak Patel, the owner of a gas station in Parish, said he was running out of milk, bread and beer. Lori Lillie, who runs Lillie's diner on Main Street in Parish, watched Sunday as table after table ordered bowl after bowl of cream of broccoli soup.

    St. Mary's Roman Catholic Church on Cayuga Street also had a crowd. "A lot of people walked all the way across town just to get here," said Phillip Kehoe, 51, a deacon.

    Despite a reprieve for most of Sunday, forecasters said they expected more snow late last night as well as Monday and Tuesday.

    A lake-effect snowstorm, in which cold, dry winds sweep across bodies of warmer lake water, was the cause of the powerful blast of snow, forecasters said, and is the usual cause of some of the area's heaviest snowfall.

    The official state record for snowfall from a single event is 10 feet 7 inches in Montague, in Lewis County, northeast of Oswego, from Dec. 26, 2001, to Jan. 1, 2002, said John Rozbicki, a meteorologist at the National Weather Service in Buffalo. He said that on Monday the Weather Service would begin a check of snowfall data from Redfield, including a review of radar results, before deciding whether the record had been broken.

    "It could be that the snowfall total came from two separate events," Mr. Rozbicki said. "We also have to check how often the person who took the measurements took the measurements, and how they were done."

    In Scriba, which received almost eight feet of snow, Joe Scozzari, 63, a lifelong resident, was clearing a path on the roof of his garage Sunday. "I'm retired," he said with a shrug, holding his shovel. "The exercise will do me good."

    He worked happily, but quickly. "There's more snow coming," he said.

    Trymaine Lee contributed reporting.


    Top CNBC Anchor

    Arnaldo Magnani/Getty Images

    CNBC's Maria Bartiromo with racecar driver Mario Andretti at the 2004 gala for the Columbus Day parade in New York.

    CNBC

    Maria Bartiromo as CNBC's "Business Center" co-host in 1997.

    February 12, 2007

    Questions Grow About a Top CNBC Anchor

    In November 2005, Citigroup gathered top clients at a lush spa resort in Napa Valley for two days of wine tasting and a chance to road test some of the hottest luxury cars on the market.

    The test drivers included Todd S. Thomson, then the chief executive of Citigroup's wealth management arm, car collectors, clients of the bank and Maria Bartiromo, the CNBC anchor and celebrity guest.

    Their charge: To pick the 2006 car of the year for Robb Report, the luxury magazine. Like many of the judges, Ms. Bartiromo chose the bright red Ferrari Spider, according to one attendee. So did Mr. Thomson, a car enthusiast.

    "It's the ultimate package of sex and performance," he told a reporter for the magazine.

    With its blend of high living, glitz and privileged access, the event provides a glimpse of the rarefied world inhabited by Ms. Bartiromo, who, in her years as CNBC's most recognizable face, has lent to the reporting of once gray business news a veneer of gloss and celebrity.

    Socializing with sources is a long journalistic tradition, especially for television personalities whose renown often allows them to travel in the same elite circles as their subjects.

    But for Ms. Bartiromo, who accompanied Mr. Thomson last fall on Citigroup's corporate jet to a series of client and other bank-sponsored functions in China, her ability to gain entree into the exclusive and mostly male world of chief executives and financial titans has made her a valuable commodity to CNBC.

    After Mr. Thomson's abrupt departure from Citigroup, however, such ties have raised questions about her closeness to her sources, all of whom she also covers as the cable network's top anchor. CNBC has said that it paid commercial fare to Citigroup for Ms. Bartiromo's trip to China. And last week, Jeffrey R. Immelt, the chief executive of General Electric, CNBC's parent, voiced his support for Ms. Bartiromo and the cable network.

    "Substantially, I don't think she did anything wrong," he said.

    A CNBC spokesman said that Ms. Bartiromo flew commercial to the California event and that the network paid for her flight as it was network business.

    Ms. Bartiromo declined to comment for this article. CNBC declined to comment on whether executives had any discussions with her concerning her relationship with Mr. Thomson. However, people inside of CNBC did say that she will continue to cover the company as part of her regular duties.

    Whether it is providing a personalized video tribute — shot from inside the CNBC newsroom — to Stephen A. Schwarzman, the chairman of the buyout giant Blackstone Group to celebrate his 60th birthday or mingling with a source at a benefit for the New York City Ballet, Ms. Bartiromo's proximity to the people she covers has created a model of journalism that jibes perfectly with CNBC's mandate to ramp up its ratings by adding pizzazz and drama to its coverage.

    Still, Mr. Thomson's departure and Ms. Bartiromo's connection to him have raised questions within the network over the possible tension between CNBC's duty to pursue big financial news stories and its loyalty to Ms. Bartiromo.

    On Dec. 11, after the appointment of Robert Druskin as chief operating officer of Citigroup, Ms. Bartiromo and Charles Gasparino, a CNBC on-air editor, had a brief on-air clash when Ms. Bartiromo remarked that an earlier report by Mr. Gasparino that Sallie L. Krawcheck would leave her job as chief financial officer did not pan out.

    "That is not what I said," Mr. Gasparino shot back. "I didn't say that," as he argued that Ms. Krawcheck and Mr. Thomson were no longer heirs to succeed Charles O. Prince as chief executive.

    Subsequently, according to people with an understanding of how the story unfolded, Mr. Gasparino learned that, in fact, Mr. Thomson's job was in jeopardy.

    He explained this to Jonathan Wald, head of news programming, that he had been told by people within Citigroup that top management had examined Mr. Thomson's conduct, specifically the occasions that Ms. Bartiromo joined him on the company jet. Mr. Wald told Mr. Gasparino to pursue the story, these people say.

    When Ms. Bartiromo got wind of Mr. Gasparino's reporting, she told Mr. Wald, complaining that her name was being dragged into the matter, these people say. Mr. Wald said that reporting the story was Mr. Gasparino's job.

    Nevertheless, Mr. Gasparino never reported on Mr. Thomson's threatened job status. He was urged to proceed cautiously with the story, but some within the network say Ms. Bartiromo's role in the story prevented it from being fully reported.

    Mr. Wald adamantly disagrees with that interpretation. "We were clear from the beginning about reporting the story to the fullest. We did not air it because it was not adequately sourced. It didn't meet our criteria from a journalist's standpoint, and it clearly wouldn't have met our lawyers' criteria."

    On Jan 22, when Citigroup announced Mr. Thomson's resignation, Mr. Gasparino could barely contain his frustration.

    "Two weeks ago I caught wind that essentially Todd Thomson was out," he said on air that morning when the news broke. Compounding this tension is the fact that no CNBC reporter or anchor has mentioned Ms. Bartiromo's link to Mr. Thomson's departure.

    Typically, Ms Bartiromo's interviewing style can be probing, aggressive and, her special access notwithstanding, she can make even some of her best sources sweat a bit on camera.

    In an interview with Robert L. Nardelli, the recently ousted chief executive of Home Depot, she peppered him with sharp questions relating to his conduct and governance at the company. And a question posed to President Bush about his use of Google elicited a revealing response from the president as he referred to the search engine as "the Google."

    "She is not a marshmallow," said Gerard R. Roche, the chairman of the executive search firm Heidrick & Struggles, who has been interviewed by Ms. Bartiromo.

    John J. Mack, the chief executive of Morgan Stanley, agreed, recalling an interview he had with her. "She put me on the spot big time," he said, adding that he did not socialize with Ms. Bartiromo.

    "She is a professional," Mr. Mack said. "You can't assume that you will go on air and that it will be a cakewalk."

    At the same time, the occasional gushing aside can betray an admiration for her subjects — many of whom she knows socially, either from events at the New York City Ballet, where she is a trustee, or her regular lunches at San Pietro, the favored restaurant of Wall Street titans.

    "When we come back, the allure of John Mack," she once said during an interview.

    In many instances, the sentiment on Wall Street seems to be mutual.

    It is an appreciation that dates back to Ms. Bartiromo's early days in the mid-1990s, when she made a name for herself as the first journalist to report live from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

    "At the height of CNBC mania, we had these C.E.O.'s and celebrities beating down our door to ring the stock exchange bell," said Robert T. Zito, a former executive vice president at the stock exchange. "The one thing they wanted to do was meet Maria."

    For the daughter of a restaurant owner in Bay Ridge in Brooklyn, her rise to celebrity status — there are Web sites devoted to her, Joey Ramone wrote a song in her honor and she has recently trademarked her "Money Honey" nickname — has been meteoric.

    And while much has been made of her Sophia Loren-like looks, her early career ascent was propelled by pluck, ambition and like another famous, albeit fictional, product of Bay Ridge, Tony Manero in "Saturday Night Fever," a hunger to make it big across the river in Manhattan.

    She switched from C. W. Post College to New York University, and in her first media job at WMCA Radio, she impressed the radio personality Barry Farber with her willingness to do more than her share of dirty work.

    On one occasion, Mr. Farber recalled, he was sent "100 pounds of frozen North Carolina pork barbecue" and before it could melt, Ms. Bartiromo not only found a charity to take it, but delivered the meat herself in her own car. "She had the stuff and she knew how to deploy it," he said.

    In 1990, just out of college, she met Jonathan Steinberg, the son of Saul Steinberg, the corporate raider. As the two began dating, it was Mr. Steinberg, who presided over a personal finance magazine and a hedge fund, who attracted the media attention. The couple married in 1999.

    But Ms. Bartiromo's public profile would eclipse his. After a stint working for Lou Dobbs at CNN, she moved to CNBC in 1993. She became a star once she started broadcasting from the stock exchange floor.

    As her recognition grew, so did the fortunes of CNBC, and it is estimated that her compensation exceeds $1 million.

    And when she disclosed last year that the new chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben S. Bernanke, had told her in a conversation at the White House Correspondents dinner that the markets had misinterpreted his remarks on interest rates, her reputation as an insider became even more entrenched.

    Despite the controversy, Ms. Bartiromo remains a staple of CNBC. And she has kept up her public appearances, and her sense of humor.

    Earlier this month, she was scheduled to present a lifetime leadership award to former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan at the CNBC executive achievement award ceremony, at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in New York.

    "Sorry I'm late," she said with a slight giggle as she stepped up to the dais. "But I had to fly commercial."


    Market Attacks in Baghdad Kill at Least 67

    Khalid Mohammed/Associated Press

    Central Baghdad's Shorja Market after today's attacks

    February 12, 2007

    Market Attacks in Baghdad Kill at Least 67

    BAGHDAD, Feb. 12 — Four back-to-back explosions at two markets in central Baghdad killed at least 67 people and wounded 155 today, charring drivers in their cars, shredding stores and setting ablaze a seven-story building full of clothing stores that burned for more than six hours, witnesses and officials said.

    The blasts — three at Shorja market, the capital's largest bazaar, and one at Bab al-Sharji market a few blocks away — struck shortly after Iraq's Shiite-led government marked the first anniversary, by the Islamic calendar, of an attack that destroyed a revered Shiite mosque in Samarra. That bombing, which shattered the shrine's golden dome, ignited a wave of sectarian violence in Iraq that has yet to be extinguished.

    With its timing and severity, today's attack seemed intended to both fuel the country's sectarian hatreds and upstage the new American-Iraqi security plan for Baghdad.

    One thunderous explosion could be heard in the middle of an upbeat outdoor news conference by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal Al-Maliki in the Green Zone, roughly two miles from the market. Mr. Maliki did not flinch at the sound of the blast or interrupt his remarks. ("I'm very hopeful that the Iraqis will work together to support the Iraqi security forces and police" — boom! — "who are in charge of the operation," he said.)

    Still, the bombing only underscored the challenge Mr. Maliki faces in trying to inspire public confidence as sectarian violence continues.

    The attack at Shorja market was at least the fifth bombing there since August. It was one of more than a dozen strikes at markets over the past year, which have killed a total of more than 500 people. And it came on a day when the Iraqi High Tribunal ruled that Saddam Hussein's vice president, Taha Yassin Ramadan, should follow his former boss to the gallows, despite objections from American officials and Western observers, who feared that another rapid hanging would further undermine the credibility of Mr. Maliki's government.

    The court initially sentenced Mr. Ramadan to life in prison for his role in the killing of 148 Shiites in the town of Dujail in the 1980s, and the Iraqi judges who switched his punishment to death "didn't give any legal reasons for their change of action," said Miranda Sissons, leader of the Iraq program at the International Center for Transitional Justice in New York. She said no new evidence had emerged since Mr. Ramadan's November conviction.

    "The court is no longer making a judicial decision," she said. "It's political."

    There were calls for peace today, too — most notably from Iraq's leading Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani — but they were largely drowned out by fury and cries for vengeance.

    After he was sentenced to death, Mr. Ramadan said he was innocent and promised that God "will take revenge on everyone who oppressed me."

    At Shorja market, where a roadside bomb, a car bomb and a truck bomb blew up just after noon local time, people directed their anger at Sunni insurgents who they believed were responsible for the attack.

    Ali Hassan Flayha, a merchant from the market who witnessed the explosions, said the insurgents wanted only destruction, to stop daily life, kill as many people as possible and keep the public angry at the Iraqi and American governments.

    "The insurgents won't let us do our work," he said. "They are shooting at us, kidnapping our workers, starting fires just to keep us a way from the market — and they're using car bombs all the time."

    He said he could recall at least seven bomb attacks at the market since 2003. Bloodied bodies have become a familiar sight. Checkpoints and government protection have not.

    "The goal of the insurgents is to show us that the government is weak," he said. "We understand — they're right."

    Mr. Flayha and other witnesses said that one of the bombs today was concealed in a pickup truck that parked outside the Abu Hanifa building, a seven-story concrete structure with shops and restaurants on the first floor, and clothing wholesale businesses filling the rest of the building.

    The explosion, witnesses said, set the building on fire, trapping workers amid mannequins and clothing that burned like kindling and belched out smoke. Fire trucks arrived but were unable to put out the blaze for hours, leading some to question whether they had enough water.

    In the streets, bodies sat in cars, blackened. Young men pushed wooden carts with wounded survivors, their heads and bodies bandaged.

    At one point, about four hours after the explosions, Methal al-Alussi, a Sunni Arab member of Parliament, visited the scene. Merchants told him "you have to do something to help us."

    "We will try to figure it out," said Mr. Alussi, who arrived encircled with more than 20 armed guards.

    Meanwhile, in the southern Baghdad neighborhood of Dora, which American and Iraqi troops initially labeled a success after clearing houses this summer, two people were killed in a drive-by shooting, an Interior Ministry official said. Three people were killed by mortar rounds in western Baghdad and the authorities found 28 bodies throughout the city.

    In Diyala Province, where American and Iraqi troops have been fighting Sunni insurgents for control, gunmen publicly beheaded seven people, the police said. One group of suspected insurgents shot six people in the head in a public garden in one of Baquba's northern neighborhoods. A few miles further north, another group of insurgents beheaded a policeman with a sword in a public square where children usually played soccer.

    In both cases, the police said, the gunmen forced residents from their homes and made them gather to watch the killings.

    Reporting was contributed by Qais Mizher, Ali Adeeb and Abdul Razzaq Al-Saiedi.


  • Teacher's Leave Of Absence Shrouded Humorous

    Teacher Leave

    Mr. Benson, in a file photo from the faculty section of last year's Reflectionz yearbook.

    © Copyright 2007, Onion, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Teacher's Leave Of Absence Shrouded In Legend

    February 9, 2007 | Issue 43•06

    MOBILE, AL—Students at Adams Middle School have been feverishly speculating about the true circumstances surrounding seventh grade history teacher Mr. Benson's unannounced second-semester leave of absence—now approaching one month—raising the mysterious disappearance well into the status of legend among the student body at large.

    "I heard he was a pot addict, and he went mental, and they took him away to a mental institution," said Gregory Oswald, 13, a student of Benson's, adding that he remembered noticing a growing impatience in Mr. Benson in the weeks before Christmas break. "Someone told me that the first night he was there, they shocked his brain. Now he can't remember anything about the Civil War anymore."

    Many in the semi-popular teacher's fifth-period American history class say they remain suspicious of Principal Robert Standish's relative silence on the matter, and were unsatisfied by Standish's tersely worded public-address announcement explaining that Mr. Benson was out on "personal matters," and would "return soon."

    "Mr. Benson is dead," said Joel Brown, 12.

    A number of other students, such as seventh-grader Julie Krivus, seemed certain that the "Get Well Soon" card that was passed around for their teacher on Monday was meant to cover up a horrific boating accident in which the 36-year-old had his face "burned all the way off." "They had to take him to France to get a new face, but something went wrong and now he has to wear an iron mask," Krivus said.

    "Or maybe Mr. Benson faked his death because he was in trouble with the mob, and then went on a spiritual quest to India," she added.

    Other students' theories as to Mr. Benson's whereabouts include training for the 2008 Olympics in the 100-meter butterfly, robbing banks, fighting in and winning a Kumite death-match in Hong Kong, opening a restaurant in Texas, flying a hot-air balloon around the world to help poor people, searching for his real parents, having acid thrown on him by eighth-grade science teacher Roy DeWalt, being captured by the CIA as a terrorist operative, and working for the CIA to help catch terrorist operatives.

    "He had an affair with that [eighth-grade] slut Heather Winston, and the janitor caught him," 13-year-old Lauren Eckhard said. "But then she got pregnant with his baby, and that's why she had to move away last year."

    One student, who asked not to be named, said that he recently listened in on a conversation through the teachers' lounge door in which faculty members spoke specifically about Mr. Benson's location. Though the student claimed specifics were difficult to make out, he heard nothing to dispel the theory that Mr. Benson was in fact a matador recovering from wounds he sustained in his last bullfight in Madrid.

    "Remember how he had that limp right before break?" the student said.

    Sixth-grader Vince Shelky, who was recently given a detention for attempting to break into Mr. Benson's desk while the substitute teacher was at lunch, said he was sure there would be "tons of clues" regarding Mr. Benson's disappearance in his extensive lesson plans and personal papers.

    "Why would the desk drawer be locked in the first place if there wasn't something really important in there?" Shelky said. "But the point is, basically, he was living a double life. Teacher by day. Alien by night."

    Despite the growing clamor and the widening scope of possible scenarios to explain Mr. Benson's absence, not everyone is convinced that the teacher ever actually went missing to begin with.

    "I saw Mr. Benson coming out of McDonald's yesterday," said 12-year-old Harry Dale, whose testimony was dismissed by a number of students aware of his reputation as a burnout. "I didn't recognize him at first—he was wearing a trench coat and a hat, but I could tell it was him. When I tried to get a closer look, he disappeared."

    Curiosity was further piqued last Friday when Mr. Benson's wife, Lisa, appeared at the school to pick up her husband's mail, and told the receptionist that he would be returning within a week.

    "I wouldn't listen to his wife," Amanda Bell, 13, said. "She's the one who poisoned him anyway."

    © Copyright 2007, Onion, Inc. All rights reserved.
    The Onion is not intended for readers under 18 years of age.

     
    Happy Valentine's Day

    For every weirdo and crackpot that might be lurking in some crevice there are thousands of people like ourselves who value the importance of communicating and supporting each other while recognizing that we are probably doomed to extinction or worse unless the inherrent isolation and alienation in our modern world is mitigated by the power of this technology to bind us together.

    Life is not easy, and the only thing that we can do to make some of the bad stuff better is to honestly love one another and help each other and if we all do that the whole load of human sufferring can only begin to lift and become lighter.

    We will bring ourselves back from this brink of extinction one person, one note, one act of kindness, one leap of faith, one trust, one sacrifice, one prayer, one sharing, one flower, one hug, ONE LOVE at a time

    Happy Valentines Day To One and All

    Thank You For All of The Love and Support,

    Michael

     
    Taking deep breath of freedom

    Relief

    Timothy Atkins and cousin Pischon Jones leave L.A. County Jail on Friday. "It's over. I made it," Atkins said.
    (Luis Sinco / LAT)
    Feb 9, 2007


    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-innocent10feb10,0,3314761.story?coll=la-home-local

    Taking deep breath of freedom

    After 20 years in prison for a killing that a key witness now says he didn't commit, Timothy Atkins wants only some fresh air.

    By Ashraf Khalil
    Times Staff Writer

    February 10, 2007

    A lifelong heavy drug user, frequently homeless or in jail, Denise Powell was a hard person to track down.

    Researchers for the California Innocence Project spent months searching for Powell — who was only in intermittent contact with her own family. Their goal was to finally document on the record what Powell had been openly admitting for years: Her testimony implicating Timothy Atkins for murder was false.

    When researcher Wendy Koen finally found Powell in early 2005, in rehab after a recent arrest, she confessed without hesitation.

    "She was ready to talk. She'd been wanting to talk for years," Koen said. "She said, 'I was young and stupid. I didn't know it would come to this. I lied.' "

    Thus began the final step in Atkins' 20-year campaign to prove his innocence. On Friday morning, Atkins, now 39, walked out of Los Angeles County Jail and into the arms of his family, free for the first time since his teens.

    "It's over. I made it," he said, as weeping, whooping relatives lined up to embrace him. "I don't think the realization hit me until late last night."

    In light of Powell's recanted testimony, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael A. Tynan overturned Atkins' conviction Thursday and ordered his immediate release. Tynan was the trial judge in 1987 when Atkins was convicted of second-degree murder and two counts of robbery and sentenced to 32 years in prison.

    In his ruling freeing Atkins, Tynan recalled that Powell's testimony was "the key to the conviction in this case…. The state has no interest in upholding a conviction obtained by false testimony."

    On Friday, Atkins still looked a little shellshocked as he was swarmed by dozens of ecstatic family members and the beaming legal team from the California Innocence Project, part of the California Western School of Law in San Diego.

    "This is the pinnacle of our existence," said project director Justin Brooks. "This is the whole goal: freeing the innocent."

    Back at his cousin Tanya Franklin's house in South Los Angeles, Atkins dispensed hugs and fielded congratulatory phone calls. After decades of incarceration, he spent most of his time outside on the front lawn.

    Franklin asked, "You want to come inside?"

    "No," he answered, "I want air."

    Atkins' conviction stemmed from a New Year's Day 1985 carjacking attempt in which flower shop owner Vincente Gonzales was killed.

    Powell, an acquaintance of Atkins at the time, told police that Atkins and another man, Ricky Evans, had bragged about killing Gonzales. Both men were arrested. Evans was beaten to death in jail before the case could come to trial; Atkins was seriously injured in the same jailhouse fight.

    "I'm thinking about Ricky a lot today," said Atkins, who has remained in contact with Evans' mother.

    If Evans had lived, "He would have been exonerated as well," Koen said. "It was the same evidence against him."

    Police were unable to find Powell to testify at Atkins' trial. Instead, her testimony at a preliminary hearing was read aloud in court.

    In his ruling releasing Atkins, Tynan wrote that Powell's absence from the trial was crucial. If she had appeared, subject to cross-examination from the defense, "her demeanor and other indicia of truthfulness and veracity, or their absence, would have been observed by the jury," Tynan wrote. "In all reasonable probability the result would have been more favorable" for Atkins.

    Other evidence, such as a vague description of the suspects from the victim's widow, were deemed equally shaky in hindsight by Tynan.

    The judge also leveled pointed criticism at police for their "casual attitude toward maintaining contact with Powell." The failure to find and produce her for the trial "appears to be an error of constitutional magnitude," Tynan wrote.

    Despite losing half his life to the prison sentence, Atkins said he bore no ill will toward Powell or anyone else.

    "The past is the past," he said. "If I see her, I'll speak to her and if I can help her, I will."

    Atkins and several family members expressed sympathy for Powell, who has a long history of drug addiction and legal problems and has said she was remorseful over her role in Atkins' jailing.

    Powell told researchers she was pressured by police to name a suspect in Gonzales' slaying.

    "They got her into the station and told her, 'You're not going to leave until you tell us something,' " said Brooks, who listened to a recording of Powell's initial interrogation.

    "She had a whole lot of guilt over what she had done to Tim's life," said Koen, who videotaped Powell's statement for the Innocence Project and tracked her down a second time to sign an official court declaration of her changed testimony. "The guilt has really destroyed her life in a lot of ways."

    Atkins, who said he plans to work counseling at-risk youth, was remarkably philosophical Friday about his ordeal. He admits to a misspent youth before his arrest and views his incarceration as the only reason he's going to live into his 40s.

    "I was a gang member. I was a thief and I had a drug habit," he said. "The life that I was living before, I probably would have ended up dead."

    The Los Angeles County district attorney has 60 days to refile charges against Atkins. But Brooks does not expect prosecutors to do so.

    "They have no case. They had no case 20 years ago," he said.

    Brooks plans to file for state compensation, which offers $100 for each day in prison for those found to be wrongfully convicted. For Atkins, that could mean close to $800,000.

    There's also the possibility of a civil suit against the police for wrongful imprisonment, "but that would be a tougher nut," Brooks said.

    "First we'll go for the compensation and get him some money to get on his feet."

    For now, Atkins is celebrating, adjusting to life as a free man and enjoying some home cooking.

    "I'm whole now. I got my baby back," said Atkins' mother, Joyce Boney. "I'm going to the store. My boy wants to eat."


    ashraf.khalil@latimes.com

     
    A Princeton Lab on ESP Plans to Close Its Doors

    Richard Perry/The New York Times

    Robert G. Jahn founded a Princeton laboratory that is closing after almost 30 years of disputed research on telekinesis and the ability of the mind to influence machines. Brenda Dunne is the laboratory's manager.

    February 10, 2007

    A Princeton Lab on ESP Plans to Close Its Doors

    PRINCETON, N.J., Feb. 6 — Over almost three decades, a small laboratory at Princeton University managed to embarrass university administrators, outrage Nobel laureates, entice the support of philanthropists and make headlines around the world with its efforts to prove that thoughts can alter the course of events.

    But at the end of the month, the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research laboratory, or PEAR, will close, not because of controversy but because, its founder says, it is time.

    The laboratory has conducted studies on extrasensory perception and telekinesis from its cramped quarters in the basement of the university's engineering building since 1979. Its equipment is aging, its finances dwindling.

    "For 28 years, we've done what we wanted to do, and there's no reason to stay and generate more of the same data," said the laboratory's founder, Robert G. Jahn, 76, former dean of Princeton's engineering school and an emeritus professor. "If people don't believe us after all the results we've produced, then they never will."

    Princeton made no official comment.

    The closing will end one of the strangest tales in modern science, or science fiction, depending on one's point of view. The laboratory has long had a strained relationship with the university. Many scientists have been openly dismissive of it.

    "It's been an embarrassment to science, and I think an embarrassment for Princeton," said Robert L. Park, a University of Maryland physicist who is the author of "Voodoo Science: The Road From Foolishness to Fraud." "Science has a substantial amount of credibility, but this is the kind of thing that squanders it."

    PEAR has been an anomaly from the start, a ghost in the machine room of physical science that was never acknowledged as substantial and yet never entirely banished. Its longevity illustrates the strength and limitations of scientific peer review, the process by which researchers appraise one another's work.

    "We know people have ideas beyond the mainstream," said the sociologist Harriet Zuckerman, author of "Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States" and senior vice president of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, "but if they want funds for research they have to go through peer review, and the system is going to be very skeptical of ideas that are inconsistent with what is already known."

    Dr. Jahn, one of the world's foremost experts on jet propulsion, defied the system. He relied not on university or government money but on private donations — more than $10 million over the years, he estimated. The first and most generous donor was his friend James S. McDonnell, a founder of the McDonnell Douglas Corporation.

    Those gifts paid for a small staff and a gallery of random-motion machines, including a pendulum with a lighted crystal at the end; a giant, wall-mounted pachinko-like machine with a cascade of bouncing balls; and a variety of electronic boxes with digital number displays.

    In one of PEAR's standard experiments, the study participant would sit in front of an electronic box the size of a toaster oven, which flashed a random series of numbers just above and just below 100. Staff members instructed the person to simply "think high" or "think low" and watch the display. After thousands of repetitions — the equivalent of coin flips — the researchers looked for differences between the machine's output and random chance.

    Analyzing data from such trials, the PEAR team concluded that people could alter the behavior of these machines very slightly, changing about 2 or 3 flips out of 10,000. If the human mind could alter the behavior of such a machine, Dr. Jahn argued, then thought could bring about changes in many other areas of life — helping to heal disease, for instance, in oneself and others.

    This kind of talk fascinated the public and attracted the curiosity of dozens of students, at Princeton and elsewhere. But it left most scientists cold. A physics Ph.D. and an electrical engineer joined Dr. Jahn's project, but none of the university's 700 or so professors did. Prominent research journals declined to accept papers from PEAR. One editor famously told Dr. Jahn that he would consider a paper "if you can telepathically communicate it to me."

    Brenda Dunne, a developmental psychologist, has managed the laboratory since it opened and has been a co-author of many of its study papers. "We submitted our data for review to very good journals," Ms. Dunne said, "but no one would review it. We have been very open with our data. But how do you get peer review when you don't have peers?"

    Several expert panels examined PEAR's methods over the years, looking for irregularities, but did not find sufficient reasons to interrupt the work. In the 1980s and 1990s, PEAR published more than 60 research reports, most appearing in the journal of the Society for Scientific Exploration, a group devoted to the study of topics outside the scientific mainstream. Dr. Jahn and Ms. Dunne are officers in the society.

    News of the Princeton group's experiments spread quickly worldwide, among people interested in paranormal phenomena, including telekinesis and what people call extrasensory perception. Notable figures from Europe and Asia stopped by. . Keith Jarrett, the jazz pianist, paid a visit. For a time, the philanthropist Laurance Rockefeller visited regularly and donated money for research.

    And many people, in and out of science, joined what Ms. Dunne called the PEAR Tree, a kind of secret society of people interested in the paranormal, she said. Many PEAR Tree members who are science faculty members will not reveal themselves publicly, Ms. Dunne said.

    The culture of science, at its purest, is one of freedom in which any idea can be tested regardless of how far-fetched it might seem.

    "I don't believe in anything Bob is doing, but I support his right to do it," said Will Happer, a professor of physics at Princeton.

    Other top-flight scientists have taken chances. At the end of his career, Linus Pauling, the Nobel laureate, came to believe that vitamin C supplements could prevent and treat cancer, heart disease and other ailments. Dr. Pauling had some outside financing, too, and conducted research and had plenty of media coverage. But in the end he did not sway many of his colleagues, Dr. Zuckerman said.

    At the PEAR offices this week, the staff worked amid boxes, piles of paper and a roll of bubble wrap as big as an oil drum. The random-event machines are headed for storage.

    The study of telekinesis and related phenomena, Dr. Jahn said, will carry on.

    "It's time for a new era," he said, "for someone to figure out what the implications of our results are for human culture, for future study, and — if the findings are correct — what they say about our basic scientific attitude."


     
    Inquiry on Intelligence Gaps

    Mian Khursheed/Reuters

    The Pentagon is critical of Douglas J. Feith's analyses of Iraq.

    February 10, 2007

    Inquiry on Intelligence Gaps May Reach to White House

    WASHINGTON, Feb. 9 — The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said Friday that he would ask current and former White House aides to testify about a report by the Pentagon's inspector general that criticizes the Pentagon for compiling "alternative intelligence" that made the case for invading Iraq.

    The chairman, Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan, said that among those called to testify could be Stephen J. Hadley, the national security adviser, and I. Lewis Libby, a former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney. Both received a briefing from the defense secretary's policy office in 2002 on possible links between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's government.

    In its report on Thursday, the acting inspector general, Thomas F. Gimble, found that the work done by the Pentagon team, which was assembled by Douglas J. Feith, a former under secretary of defense for policy, was "not fully supported by the available intelligence."

    It was not clear whether Mr. Hadley and Mr. Libby would testify. The White House normally resists having top aides testify before Congress.

    The Senate Intelligence Committee may also seek to question the men. Tara Andringa, a spokeswoman for Mr. Levin, said Mr. Levin planned to consult with Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, Democrat of West Virginia and chairman of that committee. Mr. Levin is on both committees.

    The inspector general's report found that while the Feith team did not violate any laws or knowingly mislead Congress, it made dubious interpretations of intelligence reports and shared them with senior officials without making clear that its findings had already been discounted or discredited by the main intelligence agencies.

    "The actions, in our opinion, were inappropriate, given that all the products did not clearly show the variance with the consensus of the intel community, and in some cases were shown as intel products," Mr. Gimble told the Armed Services Committee in a hearing on Friday.

    That set off a two-hour partisan clash. Democrats argued that the report showed intelligence had been manipulated to justify an invasion of Iraq, and Republicans insisted that Mr. Feith's office did nothing wrong by reaching conclusions that differed from those of the main intelligence agencies and presenting them to higher-ups, who had asked for the re-examination in the first place.

    Senator Levin, who has long been a leading critic of Mr. Feith's role, called the report "a devastating condemnation of inappropriate activities" by Mr. Feith. But Senator James M. Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma, responded, "I don't think in any way that his report can be interpreted as a devastating condemnation."

    Mr. Gimble said formal intelligence findings did not corroborate some of the Pentagon's assertions: that Mr. Hussein's government and Al Qaeda had a "mature symbiotic relationship," that it involved a "shared interest and pursuit of" unconventional weapons and that there were "some indications" of coordination between Iraq and Al Qaeda on the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

    The briefers from Mr. Feith's office should have noted their departures from the formal consensus findings of intelligence agencies, Mr. Gimble said.

    Representative Ike Skelton, a Democrat from Missouri and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Mr. Feith's office exercised "extremely poor judgment for which our nation, and our service members in particular, are paying a terrible price."

    Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, noted that Mr. Feith's superiors at the Pentagon had asked him to re-examine intelligence on links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Therefore, Mr. Sessions said, there was no need for the briefers to point out that their conclusions differed from those of the C.I.A., because the briefing was intended as a "critique" of the agencies' conclusions.

    A similar argument has been made in a formal rebuttal to the inspector general that was prepared by Mr. Feith's successor at the Pentagon.


  • Secret of Love Is ...

    David Chelsea
    February 11, 2007
    Modern Love

    Dear Editor, the Secret of Love Is ...

    EACH year, as the day nears when we are expected to celebrate (or at least positively spin) the current state of our romantic lives, people start asking me what I, as the editor of this column, have learned about love. Surely, they assume, I've learned something from spending my days immersed in strangers' relationship stories. But whenever this seeming softball of a question comes hurtling at me, my mind goes blank.

    In need of an answer, I sift through hundreds of essays submitted for the column, searching for trends, clues, even a measly tip or two. This year, I relived the oddity of the middle-aged woman who couldn't decide when best to inform her dates that she's never had sex, and of the man who faced a similar quandary when it came to disclosing that he has only one testicle. I read cheery stories of those who found love only after giving up, and darker tales of philandering husbands, rebellious children, stalking lovers, flirtatious doctors and baffling breakups.

    In these accounts I found exactly one common thread: Wisdom about love is sorely lacking. Over the millennia we Homo sapiens, with our ever-evolving intelligence and sensibilities, have made great strides on many fronts (human rights! space travel!), but when it comes to love, we don't seem to evolve so much as revolve.

    Given this history of futility, maybe we should stop asking each other what we have learned about love. The better question is: In what new and creative ways have we failed to learn? That I can answer. So here, with gratitude to the thousands of writers who every year send me their confessions of doubt and disorder, I offer my thoughts on those areas where we have made no discernible progress in learning about love since last Valentine's Day.

    1. HOW TO AVOID FEELING JEALOUS OVER REALLY DUMB THINGS

    This year I heard from several wives who claim to be jealous of the relationship their husbands have with the woman's voice on the car's navigation device. Not only is it strangely seductive and somehow more sophisticated than the wife's voice, it also provides flawless directions, an ability it unfairly flaunts to gain the husband's admiration and trust. How, these wives wonder, are they supposed to compete with a dashboard dominatrix who has her own built-in Global Positioning System? And how are they to feel when their husbands shush them so they can better hear the advice of their leather-bound mistress of the console?

    2. HOW TO REMEMBER THAT WHEREVER YOU GO, THERE YOU ARE

    Online communities like SecondLife allow members to create animated versions of themselves called avatars that can go on dates, fly, carouse, even engage in prostitution. Theodora Stites wrote vividly in this space about how she conducts much of her romantic life this way and confessed to enlarging her avatar's chest and perfecting its features to attract suitable male avatars.

    You might assume that on SecondLife you are protected from the emotional upheaval of real relationships because the animated couplings tend to be, well, fake. But here's the catch: They're not fake. It's still you behind the screen and you who is being accepted or rejected, with all the attendant joy and pain. As Theodora explained, "I've found that I act much as I do in real life, and my SecondLife relationships tend to fail the same way my real-life relationships do."

    3. HOW TO EMBRACE THE NO-FAULT BREAKUP

    There surely is plenty of blame to go around in most breakups, but that's not the way we tend to see it. We tend to believe only one person is at fault. The other person. Especially when that person is a man. Please don't shoot the messenger on this one; I'm simply telling you what I have observed.

    Among the truckloads of divorce and breakup stories I've received, the prevailing sentiment is that the man is either at fault or too incommunicative for fault to be properly established. What's more, even the men blame the men.

    "He was a jerk," the women say. "He didn't know what he wanted."

    "I was a jerk," the men say. "I didn't know what I wanted."

    Can the world actually be this tilted, or is that just how we choose to write about it? Are women apt to publicly seethe while men prefer to seethe in private? Or is it more acceptable for women to complain about men than the reverse? If you know the answer, send it to modernlove@nytimes.com, and together we'll bust this case wide open.

    4. HOW TO HAVE SEX IF YOU'RE A SEX COLUMNIST

    This seemed to be the year of hearing from sex columnists who aren't having sex. In case you didn't know, it's really embarrassing to be a sex columnist who isn't having sex. The anxiety is three-fold: First, what am I supposed to write about if I'm not having sex? Second, how am I supposed to have any credibility? And third, why is this happening to me, anyway?

    5. HOW TO FIND A LASTING RELATIONSHIP FOR YOURSELF IF YOU'RE A DATING COACH

    Same as above, substituting dating coach for sex columnist and dates for sex.

    6. HOW TO GET MARRIED WHILE REMAINING SINGLE

    Hardly a week passes when I don't hear from someone stewing about the anticipated gains and losses of marriage: how to handle the last name, the loss of personal space and identity, the permanent end to sex with others, the problematic vocabulary ("wife," "husband," "until death"), the merging of finances and religions, the issue of marrying when gays can't, the questionable necessity of marriage in the first place.

    Amid all this agonizing, I also hear of creative solutions, such as having an open marriage and sleeping with whomever you want, putting a Star of David atop your Christmas tree, and maintaining separate bedrooms or houses. As for the last-name problem, you could always try the technique of one enterprising couple: let your dog make the decision by building a contraption rigged with treats and levers that old Spot nudges with his nose during your actual wedding ceremony to select the name you, your spouse and your future children will have for the rest of your lives.

    7. HOW TO BECOME A PARENT WHILE REMAINING CHILDLESS

    From what I've observed, the real before-and-after divide in life is not getting married but having children (or not). The accounts of hand-wringing pour in: flamed-out friendships when one has a child and the other doesn't, defensiveness from those who decide against but continue to feel pressure, and crushing ambivalence among couples who, year after year, simply can't decide.

    What are their pros and cons? Wanting a child for the anticipated bond and expansion of love that everyone promises versus the feared curtailing of career opportunities, travel, sleep and leisure, sometimes combined with worries of parental incompetence or of bringing a child into a world that is already overpopulated. But the greatest struggle often involves those couples where one wants a child and the other does not, even when, in some cases, they were in agreement before marrying.

    8. HOW TO MAKE LOVE LIKE A PORN STAR

    Since I've heard from only one person in 30 months who even vaguely seemed to make love like a porn star (in the sense that she films herself), it might be safe to assume this kind of activity is not a nationwide trend. But there's a book out called "How to Make Love Like a Porn Star," and it has been a huge best seller. So it's entirely possible that thousands are making love like porn stars but are simply (understandably) not writing essays about it.

    9. HOW TO COMMENT APPROPRIATELY ON YOUR GIRLFRIEND'S APPEARANCE

    One would hope men had figured this one out by now. Yet in an account I received not long ago, a guy mused aloud to his girlfriend (who wrote the piece) about how he must have "grown emotionally" lately because she was the most "full-figured" woman he'd ever dated, and while in the past he wouldn't have been attracted to such a body type, he had, with her, somehow managed to get over that hurdle.

    But who am I to judge? They are now — you guessed it — married.

    10. HOW TO FINALLY GET OVER THE LINGERING FANTASY OF THAT LONG-LOST LOVE

    In one area, however, we are learning, at least according to various versions of this story that have come my way: You fell in love that summer in college. Or while studying in Rome. Or while milking goats in Bhutan. Whatever the case, your time together was magical, it ended prematurely, and you never forgot. And 20 years later, when the routine of your life (children, work, chores, little sex, no romance, not even a Valentine's Day card for the spouse on your radar screen) starts to get you down, you find yourself wondering, What kind of glamorous life is he/she leading now? What if that had been my life?

    At long last we are finding out, and we are doing so en masse, courtesy of Google text and image searches, even Google Earth (aerial shot of his house, anyone?). In time, we stumble upon an e-mail address, compose the perfect note, swallow hard and hit send. And soon we're reading about the amiable husband/wife, the overscheduled children and the unsurprising career, all in a tone that's breezy, passionless. "But it's such fun to reconnect," he/she blathers on. "And wouldn't it be a scream if the next time we're in the same city on business we could meet up for a cappuccino?"

    And just like that, for many of us at least, the fantasy evaporates. The grass is not greener. It's the exact same grass, or maybe even browner. So you log off, stand up, splash water on your face, and stride back into your life with fresh eyes. After all, you love the children you have, not the children you might have had. And the same goes for your spouse, who would never call anything "a scream" and who, for that reason alone, deserves a special card this year, perhaps even chocolates.

    Happy Valentine's Day.

    Daniel Jones is the editor of Modern Love. His latest book, "Modern Love: 50 True and Extraordinary Tales of Desire, Deceit and Devotion," a collection of essays from this column, is just out from Three Rivers Press.


     

    Brian Jones/Associated Press

    An Adidas ad featuring the All-Stars Kevin Garnett and Dwight Howard at the Luxor Hotel. Las Vegas is one of the fastest-growing U.S. metropolitan areas without a professional sports team.

    February 11, 2007

    Las Vegas Has Got the Game, but It Wants a Team

    LAS VEGAS, Feb. 9 — Here, where the fountains dance and the stage lights never go dark, where the cheesy and the risqué mingle alongside celebrities to a soundtrack of slot machines, decadence has found a new friend.

    The N.B.A. All-Star Game, the league's biggest annual party, is about to descend here next weekend. The game, of course, is only an exhibition. But what isn't in Las Vegas?

    For the first time, a non-N.B.A. city will play host to the All-Star Game. Las Vegas, one of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas (population: 1.9 million) in the country without a professional sports team, wants to showcase itself as worthy of becoming a full-time major league city.

    The odds, however, that the N.B.A. or any other league will soon come to Las Vegas for more than just a vacation — through relocation or expansion — are low. For now.

    David Stern, the N.B.A. commissioner, has made "integrity of the game" his battle cry in the years since the Pacers-Pistons brawl and says that local gambling on the league, though regulated, would violate that tenet. He maintains that casinos must take all N.B.A. games off their oddsmakers' books before Las Vegas could be a viable site.

    "There's only one stumbling block," Stern said in an interview this week, referring to the legalized betting on N.B.A. games. "It has to be off the books for consideration. It is that, more than any other issue."

    To be sure, the building and financing of a new Las Vegas arena to replace the 23-year-old Thomas & Mack Center could be almost as difficult. Already, arena-financing issues are threatening franchises in Sacramento and Seattle, and, to a lesser degree, Orlando and Milwaukee. Las Vegas could offer an exit strategy for some franchises, but not for the Sacramento Kings.

    Joe Maloof, whose family owns the Kings and operates the thriving Palms Casino Resort in Las Vegas, said he wanted the team to remain in Sacramento.

    "Sooner, rather than later, there's going to be an N.B.A. team in Las Vegas," said Maloof, who added that Coach Jerry Tarkanian's success in the early 1990s at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas made the city a true basketball destination. "It's one of the great last cities that doesn't have a franchise, and it needs one."

    Joe Maloof's brother George, the owner of the Palms, estimated that there was a 10 percent chance that a professional sports team would move to Las Vegas in the next five years. But the city's colorful mayor, Oscar Goodman, who likes to promote his city with showgirls on his arm, projected far better odds.

    "Guaranteed — even money," Goodman said in an interview Friday in his office. "I bet on anything that moves. I'm ready to bet my reputation that we will have serious discussions about getting a major league franchise here in Las Vegas, and these discussions will begin before the spring of this year."

    Goodman would not say whether it would be an N.B.A. or N.H.L. team, only that it would not be a baseball or football team.

    Major League Baseball did flirt with Las Vegas in 2004 about relocating the Montreal Expos there before eventually deciding on Washington. Officials from the Florida Marlins also met with Goodman in 2004 before Commissioner Bud Selig directed Goodman to stop the talks because baseball wanted the team to remain in South Florida.

    Before the Super Bowl last Sunday, N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell bluntly dismissed Las Vegas as a site. "I have my personal views about gambling, and I don't think it's in the best interests of the N.F.L. to have any association with sports betting," Goodell said.

    The N.F.L., of course, is the professional league that generates the most betting revenue, according to Nevada's Gaming Control Board.

    Meanwhile, given the N.H.L.'s struggles, perhaps it was not surprising that Bill Daly, the league's deputy commissioner, said in a telephone interview Friday that the league would have a "flexible approach" toward local betting on the sport if a franchise ended up in Las Vegas.

    Goodman first met with officials from the N.H.L. several years ago. "There's clearly a return interest," Daly said, adding that some private parties in Las Vegas were having continuing discussions.

    During the N.B.A. All-Star weekend, by order of Stern and Nevada's Gaming Control Board, casinos cannot offer betting on the All-Star Game.

    "We're talking about one basketball game right now, and it's really an exhibition," said Chuck Esposito, the assistant vice president for race and sports book operations at Caesars Palace. "There are so many other positives from one game." But, he added, taking one of the major sports off the casino betting boards on a permanent basis "would have much more of an impact in the industry."

    As a result, he said, "We'd have to weigh all the pros and cons" of an N.B.A. franchise in Las Vegas.

    Because of the Maloofs' ownership of the Kings, the Palms cannot have betting on any N.B.A. games, at any time. "It hurts us a little bit," Joe Maloof said. "We still show the games, but they can't bet on it."

    For decades, casinos prohibited betting on U.N.L.V. games, but in 2001 Nevada's Gaming Control Board reversed the ban. What if the N.B.A. were to accept a partial ban, perhaps only on games that a Las Vegas franchise plays?

    Goodman sees compromise as essential. A trial lawyer who made his reputation defending organized crime bosses in Las Vegas, Goodman is preparing to plead his case to Stern next week. "Hopefully, I can change his mind," Goodman said. "He's a smart man."

    Neither Stern nor his owners appear to be in a hurry to resolve the issue.

    "I don't know enough of the details about the city to give a final answer, but philosophically I have no problem with the gambling side of it," Mark Cuban, the Dallas Mavericks' owner, wrote in an e-mail message Thursday when asked about the possibility of an N.B.A. team in Las Vegas. "If the economics work, I'm all for it."

    The Houston Rockets' owner, Les Alexander, said: "I think the owners are in favor of it. I don't see any reason why the N.B.A. wouldn't be successful in Vegas. It's a big enough population. The potential for arena suite sales and sponsorships could make it one of the best."

    The N.B.A. All-Star Game caters precisely to that kind of crowd. Tickets for the game were available to sponsors and to the league's international partners, but not directly available to fans.

    Sponsors are renting out lavish suites in the Palms, where all the players are staying. Nike has taken over the 10,000-square foot Hardwood Suite in the Palms, complete with a small basketball court and a Jacuzzi.

    Adidas has placed giant screen murals of its stars — Tracy McGrady, Gilbert Arenas, Kevin Garnett, Dwight Howard — on the side of the MGM Grand and Luxor Hotels. Dwyane Wade posts up for T-Mobile on the side of the Mandalay Bay.

    The idea for an N.B.A. All-Star Game in Las Vegas came from the Maloof brothers, who approached Stern. By the summer of 2005, the game was approved by the casinos, the city and the league.

    Stern is excited about Las Vegas's entertainment value, but he plays down the risk of an image hit for the league in a city known for indiscretion. Of course, more damage might have been done to the N.B.A.'s image in America's heartland this season when Indiana Pacers players engaged in two late-night incidents at Indianapolis nightclubs.

    "There's potential in any city," Stern said. "What we've found is that indiscretion knows no geographic boundaries or political boundaries."

    The N.B.A. is going where gambling is strictly regulated and casinos already have a high level of security and surveillance. City officials are so confident in their ability to play host to major events that Rossi Ralenkotter, the president of the Convention and Visitors Authority, has already talked to Stern about bringing the game back in 2011.

    "I think it is fair to say that this is a test case — for both neutral sites as well as Las Vegas as such a site," Stern said Friday.

    As for real contests, the N.B.A. is no stranger to Las Vegas. The Utah Jazz played 11 games of its 1983-84 season there while its arena was under construction. During the Los Angeles riots of 1992, a Lakers first-round playoff game against the Portland Trail Blazers was moved there.

    Whether the county government wants to build a new arena for a permanent N.B.A. team is another story.

    Rory Reid, chairman of the Clark County Board of Commissioners, formed a task force with Goodman to determine the necessity and cost of a new arena to lure a franchise to Las Vegas. Reid has dampened Goodman's enthusiasm lately by declaring that the public should not finance an arena. "It should not be our No. 1 priority," Reid said, considering the more pressing social welfare and criminal justice issues.

    Despite such potential obstacles, SportsCorp's Marc Ganis, a consultant who has analyzed relocations for nine franchises, said it was only a matter of time before some league chooses Las Vegas. "Because there is too much of a potential pot of gold for the first one," Ganis said.

    For now, Las Vegas awaits the N.B.A. family, coming to celebrate the past, present and future of the game.

    Both city and N.B.A. leaders are keeping their fingers crossed that impropriety is kept to a minimum. They are equally curious to see if what happens in Vegas — N.B.A. basketball — will eventually stay there.


    Mark J. Terrill/Associated Press

    Mary J. Blige won the award for best female R&B vocal performance for "Be Without You" at the 49th Annual Grammy Awards. More Photos »

    Mario Anzuoni/Reuters

    The Dixie Chicks received five nominations for their album "Taking the Long Road." More Photos

    Complete Coverage

    The Grammy Awards

    Links to related reviews by Times critics, audio clips from the Times Music Popcast and selected music clips from nominated artists.


    RelatedPartial List of Grammy Award Winners (February 11, 2007)

    February 12, 2007

    Mary J. Blige, the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Dixie Chicks Win Grammys

    LOS ANGELES, Feb. 11 — On a night when the Police reunited with a scorching rendition of "Roxanne," Mary J. Blige and the Red Hot Chili Peppers won multiple honors on Sunday at the 49th annual Grammy Awards, the music industry's lovefest held here.

    But the Recording Academy seemed to spreading the wealth, even handing out ties in two categories, as it bestowed multiple awards to the Dixie Chicks, Justin Timberlake, Bob Dylan, Tony Bennett, Gnarls Barkley, the rapper T. I. and the late jazz great Michael Brecker.

    Soon after the live telecast began on CBS, Ms. Blige's album "The Breakthrough" (Geffen) won for best R&B album and best female R&B vocal performance, complementing the Grammy she and three co-writers won for "Be Without You" as best R&B song.

    The Red Hot Chili Peppers, whose enduring punk-funk hybrid has recently captured critical acclaim to go along with its longstanding commercial success, took three Grammys before the nationally broadcast show began at the Staples Center (97 of the 108 awards were not televised). It was an auspicious beginning on a night when the band was up for as many as six awards. "Dani California," set like many of the band's songs in Los Angeles and its environs, won for best rock performance by a duo or group with vocal and best rock song. The band's double album "Stadium Arcadium," the first of that veteran group's albums to reach No. 1, won best boxed or special limited edition for its double CD.

    Mr. Timberlake, whose album "FutureSex/LoveSounds" (Jive/Zomba Label) was nominated for the most prestigious category of album of the year, won best rap/sung collaboration with T. I. for "My Love," while he and Timbaland, the go-to producer of the moment, won for best dance song. T. I. also captured the Grammy for best rap solo performance for "What You Know."

    Mr. Dylan's "Modern Times" (Columbia) picked up the award for best contemporary folk/Americana album, while Bruce Springsteen's "We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions" (Columbia) was named best traditional folk album. Another music-industry veteran, Mr. Bennett, won two early awards, including one for his duet with Stevie Wonder ("For Once in My Life") in the category of best pop collaboration with vocals. And Mr. Brecker, who died last month, also received two Grammys, for jazz instrumental solo and large jazz ensemble album on his brother Randy's album, "Best Skunk Funk" (Telarc Jazz/BHM).

    This year's nominations had a heavy R&B and neo-soul flavor, with a dash of topical antiwar sentiment.

    Ms. Blige led with eight nominations, but her album "The Breakthrough" did not receive a nod for album of the year. Ms. Blige, who has previously won three Grammys, has made the demand for respect a recurring songwriting motif. She emerged more than a decade ago with a style that departed from the slick R&B in vogue at the time, making her survival of a rough childhood and abusive relationships an integral part of her songs. But her nominated song in the record of the year category, "Be Without You," testifies to a resilient relationship and perhaps a more hopeful state of affairs.

    The Dixie Chicks captured song of the year and best country performance by a duo or group with vocal for "Not Ready to Make Nice." The country category offered up at least one more surprising twist, as the rock gods of New Jersey, Bon Jovi, won best country collaboration with vocals for "Who Says You Can't Go Home" with Jennifer Nettles. On a more anticipated note, Carrie Underwood, an "American Idol" contestant turned commercial superstar, won for female country vocal performance with "Jesus, Take the Wheel."

    The most politically charged band of the moment, the Dixie Chicks, received five nominations for their album "Taking the Long Road" (Columbia), including nods in the marquee categories of album, record and song of the year. Victory at the Grammys provides a measure of vindication. The band has been shunned by mainstream country radio since its lead singer, Natalie Maines, made an off-the-cuff remark to London concertgoers back in 2003. Boycotts and death threats followed Ms. Maines's comment about the war in Iraq: "Just so you know, we're ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas."

    But the band is unapologetic about what happened, as made clear by the chorus to its hit song "Not Ready to Make Nice": "I'm not ready to make nice/I'm not ready to back down/I'm still mad as hell/And I don't have time/To go round and round and round."

    Despite little support from country radio and disappointing concert sales, the album has sold more than 1.9 million copies. Capturing album of the year, however, was an uphill struggle. Only two country albums — Glen Campbell's "By the Time I Get to Phoenix" and the soundtrack to "O Brother, Where Art Thou?" — have triumphed in that category.

    Continuing a Grammy tradition, the polkameister Jimmy Sturr and his orchestra won for best polka album, "Polka in Paradise" (Rounder). It was their 16th Grammy. And the former president Jimmy Carter, whose recent book, "Palestine(no colon) Peace Not Apartheid," has encountered a storm of opposition, won for a less contentious but as pointed production. His "Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis" (Simon & Schuster Audio) tied in the best spoken word category with Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee's "With Ossie and Ruby: In This Life Together (Time Warner).

    Amid the melodramatic neo-soul of James Blunt (five nominations), there is also some pointed antiwar commentary in the work of other nominees. The title of Neil Young's nominees for best rock album, "Living With War," and best rock solo vocal performance, "Lookin' for a Leader," make that clear. And John Mayer's "Waiting on the World to Change" comes at the war in a more oblique manner.

    The Grammys would not be complete without a little controversy. Mr. Dylan, whose "Modern Times" garnered impressive reviews (Blender compared him to Yeats and Matisse), received no nominations in any of the most prestigious categories. Rascal Flatts' album, though one of the best-selling of the year, was snubbed in the country album category. And Timbaland, who guided much of Mr. Timberlake's "FutureSex/Love Sounds" and produced "Promiscuous" for Nelly Furtado, was shut out.

    Another of the year's biggest musical influences, the hirsute producer Rick Rubin, did win the Grammy for producer of the year, but given his aversion to these sorts of record industry social gatherings was expected to stay clear of Staples Center. Mr. Rubin, who produced nominated albums for the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Dixie Chicks, as well as tracks for Mr. Timberlake's album, has been less nimble at avoiding another uncomfortable situation: he has been at the center of a tug-of-war between two record companies. Sony BMG Music has recruited him to become co-chairman of its Columbia Records label, but his boutique label, American Recordings, is still under contract to a rival, the Warner Music Group's Warner Brothers label.

    Last year's ceremony, held on a Wednesday, bumped up against the juggernaut that is "American Idol," and the Grammys paid the price in the ratings. Slightly more than 17 million people tuned in to the telecast, down 10 percent from the 18.8 million who watched in 2005 and the lowest tally since 1995, according to Nielsen Media Research.

    In this digital-cable universe of hundreds of channels, few awards shows attract the hoopla and ratings they used to. But the Grammys have fallen more than most. They once hit a high of 51.6 million (in 1984), but even in the past decade they have reliably drawn audiences in the mid-20-million range.

    Executives of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, best known as the Recording Academy, were hoping that a little bit of the old razzle-dazzle would reverse this trend. Besides the Police, who are likely to announce a national tour on Monday, Earth, Wind & Fire, whose funkadelic sound reached its heights in the 1970s, were to join Ms. Blige and Ludacris for a performance of "Runaway Love." And the Recording Academy even tried to co-opt a little of the "American Idol" magic by holding a "My Grammy Moment" contest for one lucky unsigned artist to perform with Justin Timberlake during the show. Fans voted online at Yahoo Music, winnowing the finalists from 12 to 5 to 3. They are Africa Miranda, 30, of Montgomery, Ala.; Brenda Radney, 22, of Staten Island; and Robyn Troup, 18, of Houston. The winner will be announced live on the show.

    But even if the casting stunts goose the ratings, the larger travails of the music business will still loom over any good vibes emanating from the festivities. Even a doubling of sales of digital albums failed to make up for the continued downward trek of CD sales. Album sales last year dropped almost 5 percent, to 588 million, following a 7 percent drop the year before, according to Nielsen SoundScan. One worrisome trend was the decline in sales of hip-hop albums, which had been among the stronger performers in recent years. (Hip-hop acts also received little love from the Recording Academy; no rap album received a nomination in any of the major categories.)

    The best-selling album of 2006 was the soundtrack to the Disney Channel movie "High School Musical," which sold 3.7 million copies. And Daniel Powter's song "Bad Day" was the best-selling digital song, selling more than 2 million copies thanks in large part to its prime positioning on "American Idol." Neither recording received a Grammy nomination.

    To be eligible for an award, a recording had to have been released between Oct 1, 2005, and Sept. 30, 2006. The winners were selected by the academy's more than 11,000 voting members, who are recording industry professionals with creative or technical credits on at least six albums or songs.

    This article was reported by Jeff Leeds in Los Angeles and Lorne Manly in New York.


    SPIEGEL ONLINE - February 9, 2007, 07:12 PM
    URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,464685,00.html

    ABU DHABI MUSEUM PROJECT

    A Desert Louvre?

    By Heiko Klaas and Nicole Büsing

    Everyone's heard of the Louvre and the MOMA, but not everyone knows Abu Dhabi is aspiring to become one of the world's new culture capitals. Star architects have been commissioned to build the world's most spectacular museums on an island just off the Arab metropolis.

    In 1791, two events occured that don't seem to have much to do with one another -- at least at first sight. The Bani Yas, a Bedouin tribe, discovered a freshwater spring by the Persian Gulf and founded a small settlement that eventually became the emirate of Abu Dhabi. Several thousand kilometers away, in Paris, the constituent assembly of post-revolutionary France issued a decree nationalizing the royal art collection and announced the opening of a public museum in the Louvre. Now, 216 years later, the Louvre and Abu Dhabi suddenly have a lot in common.

    .. Vignette StoryServer 5.0 Fri Feb 09 19:26:29 2007 -->.. Asset gallery: TemplateEngine -->

    Photo Gallery: Art in the Desert

    Click on a picture to launch the image gallery (9 Photos)

    "Abu Dhabi Is to Gain a Louvre of Its Own," the New York Times announced last month. Abu Dhabi's royal family plans to buy a $650 million (€500 million) share of the Louvre. This will allow them to transfer several hundred artworks to the Arab metropolis for an initial term of 20 years. The art is to be exhibited in a planned new museum.

    The news caused a wave of indignation in France. The "Desert Louvre" isn't particularly popular in the grande nation. Critics even fear the country's national legacy may be sold off. But it seems negotiations are still ongoing. Rumor has it the French are now demanding at least $1 billion.

    "A cultural asset for the world"

    Whether it will be called the "Louvre Abu Dhabi" or something similarly intriguing, what will be built in the desert is far more than just a museum for classical art. Abu Dhabi's national Tourism Development & Investment Company (TDIC) promises "a cultural asset for the world" and a "beacon for cultural experience and exchange," in the words of Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the president of the United Arab Emirates and ruler of Abu Dhabi. The first tourist attractions will be available for viewing in 2012, and the entire project is scheduled for completion in 2018.

    Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan has commissioned no less than four of the world's most famous architects to create what promises to become one of the world's most important cultural destinations: Frank O. Gehry, Jean Nouvel, Tadao Ando and Zaha Hadid.

    Just off Abu Dhabi lies Saadiyat Island -- the name means "Island of Happiness" in Arabic -- a 27 square kilometer (10.4 square mile) piece of land where Frank O. Gehry, who was born in 1929, is to build another Guggenheim Museum. Gehry's sensational plans for a new Guggenheim on the southern tip of Manhattan were put on ice indefinitely after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. But there's justice: Now the computer-generated, abstract shapes of his architectural imagination have made it all the way to the Persian Gulf.

    New possibilities

    With its spectacular architecture of compressed and intricately interconnected cuboids, prisms, cones and cylinders, and with a total area of almost 30,000 square meters (323,000 square feet), the Abu Dhabi Guggenheim will probably far outshine its New York City predecessor. Gehry is satisfied: "Approaching the design of the museum for Abu Dhabi made it possible to consider options for design of a building that would not be possible in the United States or in Europe," he says, adding that, "It was clear from the beginning that this had to be a new invention."

    Fifty-seven-year-old Iraqi architect Zaha Hadid, who lives in London, also has bombastic plans. Her Performing Arts Center, a building complex 62 meters (203 feet) tall, will include two concert halls, an opera and two theaters. The total number of seats will be 6,300 -- about as many as the Lincoln Center in New York has. Like the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi, the theater complex will also offer spectacular views of the Persian Gulf and the skyline of the city.

    Hadid is living up to her reputation as the high priestess of deconstruction in architecture. You'll search in vain for a right angle anywhere in her model. Like the bow of a ship, the four-storey construction rises dynamically towards the sea. A network of fluidly shaped windows covers an amoeba-like structure. The auditoriums are completely white. The finespun, branchlike structure is reminiscent of the interior of a bone.

    Microcity with big ideas

    Frenchman Jean Nouvel, who was born in 1945, has adapted his metaphorically charged architectural model for the "desert Louvre" to the topographical conditions of the location -- the immediate proximity of desert and sea. He's not planning to build a single gargantuan building, but rather a "microcity" -- a cluster-like collection of differently sized building types directly by the sea. The ensemble will be dominated by a great, light-flooded dome, conceived of as a symbolic link between world cultures.

    The dome is "made of a web of different patterns interlaced into a translucent ceiling which lets a diffuse, magical light come through in the best tradition of great Arabian architecture," Nouvel says. That he, of all people, was commissioned to design this building was kept secret until the last moment. Nouvel already crafted an architectural bond between the East and the West 20 years ago, in the form of the Institut du Monde Arabe (1981-1987) in Paris.

    Tadao Ando's Maritime Museum promises to be another highlight. Born in 1941, the minimalist architect is known for his austere style, which combines the Japanese Zen tradition with the modernist penchant for bare concrete. Inspired by dhows, the traditional sailing vessels of Arab merchants, Ando has designed a fragile-looking building in the shape of an abstract sail curved by the wind. Embedded in an oasis-like natural scenario dominated by a subterranean aquarium, Ando's restrained architecture promises to become a popular haven of contemplative peace within the planned architectural overkill.

    The Biennale Park -- inspired by Venice

    The so-called Biennale Park, another development project planned for Saadiyat Island, openly acknowledges its Venetian inspiration with 19 pavilions designed by 19 younger architects. Hani Rashid is one of them. He's an Egyptian architect who lives in New York and is considered one of the most important contemporary architectural theorists. The park will be criss-crossed by a 1.5 kilometer (0.9 mile) navigable canal. As the country with the highest per capita income in the world, the United Arab Emirates certainly have no inhibitions about competing with the traditional cultural capitals of the world.

    .. Vignette StoryServer 5.0 Thu Jan 04 09:10:52 2007 -->
    Of course, all these cultural highlights also require a tourist infrastructure that can cope with the masses of people expected to arrive from all over the world. Two 10-lane highways will connect Saadayat Island to the city and the airport. The completion of 29 hotels -- including a seven-star luxury hotel that is presumably Abu Dhabi's reply to to the legendary Burj Al Arab in Dubai -- is planned for 2018. There will also be a marina for cruise ships and moneyed yacht-owners, expected to provide mooring for about 1,000 vessels.

    Saadayat Island promises to far outdo Las Vegas and Bilbao -- the traditional red rags for cultural pessimists and critics of tourism -- in terms of its capacity to provoke. And yet many culture fans may end up in Abu Dhabi sooner or later -- whether to admire the city or just to rant.

     
     

    Las Vegas police shoot officer recruit in gunbattle


    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    LAS VEGAS (AP) - A Las Vegas police recruit was gunned down and killed in a shootout with police officers Friday night after witnesses saw him throwing Mototov cocktails into the street and firing his handgun into the air.

    The recruit, described by witnesses as a heavyset man possibly in his early 30s, was seen randomly firing and throwing the incendiary devices around 8:45 p.m. near an apartment complex about a block east of the Las Vegas Strip.

    When Las Vegas police arrived, the recruit began firing at them, and a gunfight erupted.

    Officers shot the recruit multiple times, and he later died at University Medical Center, police said Saturday. Police did not identify him.

    Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie, who on Friday night was at the scene of the shooting, across Las Vegas Boulevard from Mandalay Bay, said the recruit had been in the academy since Jan. 30.

    A motive for the rampage wasn't known, but police were investigating.

    "It's a difficult situation out here just because an officer-involved shooting itself is very traumatic," Gillespie said. "And when they find out after the fact that it's somebody that's currently in our academy, I'm sure it adds more to the emotional side of what took place."

    The sheriff couldn't recall in his 26 years with the department a shootout between police and a recruit or fellow officer.

    The Clark County Fire Department arrived to put out brush fires ignited by the Molotov cocktails but retreated after the recruit pointed a handgun at them, authorities said.

    "He came loaded for bear, it seems," said Scott Allison, spokesman for the Clark County Fire Department. "Our firefighters don't usually have guns pointed at them."

    Apartment resident Frank Cardone saw part of the gunbattle from his second-story balcony.

    "I thought it was a game," said Cardone, 87, a retired police officer from North Bergen, N.J.

    Cardone said he realized it was for real when at least a dozen police officers converged on the property.

    "I said, 'Who the hell is watching the city?' There were 50 million police cars out here," he said.

    Police found two handguns in the recruit's possession, Gillespie said.

    The incident marked the second officer-involved shooting of 2007 in the Las Vegas area.

    ---

    Information from: Las Vegas Review-Journal, http://www.lvrj.com

    Today's Papers


    Putin Provokes
    By Roger McShane
    Posted Sunday, Feb. 11, 2007, at 6:06 AM E.T.

    The Los Angeles Times and Washington Post lead with, while the New York Times fronts, Vladimir Putin's harsh criticism of American foreign policy at an international security conference in Munich. Speaking in front of dozens of American and European officials, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Putin said the U.S. "has overstepped its national borders in every way," causing global instability and setting off a nuclear arms race. According to the LAT, which has the best coverage, "one German questioner jokingly told Putin he hoped the president had not set off 'another world war.'"

    The WP describes the tone of the speech as "more a considered lecture than a Khrushchevian dais-thumper." Nevertheless, in 32 minutes Putin reeled off a laundry list of complaints that touched on America's "hyper-use of military force", the West's support of reform movements in eastern Europe, American work on antimissile systems, NATO expansion, and Russian access to Western markets. An American congressional delegation that included John McCain and Joe Lieberman sat stone-faced in the audience.

    The papers do a good job of describing the scene in Munich, but the analysis is pretty thin. The WP says Putin's remarks "seemingly were not prompted by any particular provocation" and the LAT quotes analysts saying they "appeared timed to take advantage of the Bush administration's weakness." Only brief mention is given to how Russia's energy resources have allowed Putin to adopt a more assertive foreign policy, and how many Russians are fed up with criticism from the West.

    In its lead story, the NYT shows how members of Congress have already found a way around pesky new ethics rules, passed just a month ago. It's now illegal for lobbyists to pay directly for lawmakers' lavish vacations and expensive dinners. But they can still donate money to members' political action committees, which, in turn, can pay for these outings as fundraising events. The NYT compiles a nifty little list of PAC fundraising events that would make Jack Abramoff jealous (though Rep. Eric Cantor really needs to get more creative).

    In another political fundraising story, the WP says John McCain is embracing "some of the same political-money figures, forces and tactics" that he has made a career railing against. There seems to be an effort here to paint McCain as a hypocrite and his presidential campaign and reform efforts as mutually exclusive. But even his campaign finance reform allies understand the bind he is in. "It is apparent to us that to run a competitive presidential campaign inside a system that is still broken, that is what he has to do," said Mary Boyle of Common Cause. Unfortunately, that quote appears in the last sentence of the story.

    In other campaign news, Barack Obama shows us why presidential candidates form exploratory committees first—two days of headlines for the price of one. The NYT and WP both front (with photo) the formal announcement by Obama that he will be running for president. Speaking in frigid weather at the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois, where Abraham Lincoln delivered his famous "House Divided" speech, Obama laid out "an ambitious agenda that includes bringing an end to the Iraq war, eliminating poverty, ensuring universal health care and creating energy independence." Yet he again emphasized that his leadership ability was more important than specific ideas. In a sober assessment, the NYT says "it seems evident that Mr. Obama's easier days as a candidate have passed. Unlike Mrs. Clinton, or to a lesser extent Mr. Edwards, Mr. Obama has not gone through a full-scale audit."

    Elsewhere in the world, the LAT reports that Iran's reformists believe they are being undercut by the Bush administration's saber rattling, which only helps to prop up the faltering president. The administration may or may not agree with that assessment, but it has distributed new talking points that play down any suggestion of war planning, according to the WP. This comes amid signs that multilateral pressure on Iran might be working. That pressure got a bit more multilateral yesterday, when Vladimir Putin criticized Iran for not answering questions posed by the I.A.E.A. about its nuclear program.

    On the other axis of evil front, talks with North Korea have been extended after negotiators failed to reach an agreement over the energy aid North Korea would receive as compensation for closing its main nuclear reactor.

    The NYT's "Week in Review" section is chock-full of good stuff this Sunday, including a rundown of who's blaming who for the problems in Iraq. Also worth a look are Dick Cheney's notes from 1975 as he considered how the Ford White House should handle an article by Seymour Hersh about a secret espionage program. The Times says the notes show Cheney "is hostile to the press and to Congress, insistent on the prerogatives of the executive branch and adamant about the importance of national security secrets." It seems not much has changed.

    Roger McShane writes for the Economist online.

     
    Sex

    Thursday, 8 February 2007
    Lust in Space: Are Astronauts Doing It?
    Topic: sex

    107919spaceshuttleblastoffposters If you're like me -- and God help you if you are -- you've been obsessively following the astronaut love- triangle scandal. And you've been asking yourself: If two astronauts were obsessed with each other on earth, could they get it on up there in space? Especially if they had a thing about diapers?

    Slate magazine wondered the same thing. (Boy, do I like the way they think). Here's what they discovered:

    If astronauts have had space sex, it would have been very difficult. First off, there isn't much privacy up there. A regular shuttle is about as big as a 737, and the two main areas—the crew cabin and middeck—are each the size of a small office...The space station, on the other hand, has a little more room to operate.

    But if there was booty, would it be any good?

    Recent research suggests it would not. For one thing, zero gravity can induce nausea—a less-than-promising sign for would-be lovers. Astronauts also perspire a lot in flight, meaning sex without gravity would likely be hot, wet, and surrounded by small droplets of sweat. In addition, people normally experience lower blood pressure in space, which means reduced blood flow, which means … well, you know what that means.

    Viagra, right? Well, maybe not. Viagra can cause low blood pressure, not a good thing when you already have it; you might faint during a moment when you'd rather be conscious. (That's why people aren't supposed to use Viagra with nitrate medications or poppers: the two can combine to really lower blood pressure.)

    Readers, are there any drugs (legal ones, please) that astronauts could sneak into space to make sure their sexual response doesn't fall to earth? And that business about little droplets of sweat floating in the air -- would that apply to other fluids too?

    Do Astronauts Have Sex?
    [Slate]







    Posted by Randy Dotinga 1:23 AM | Post Comment | View Comments (5) | Permalink
    Do Astronauts Have Sex?
    In space, no one can hear you moan.
    By Christopher Beam
    Posted Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007, at 7:19 PM E.T.
    Astronaut Lisa Nowak is facing attempted murder charges after she drove nearly 1,000 miles to confront a rival for the affections of another astronaut, Bill Oefelein. Nowak said that she and Oefelein had "more than a working relationship, but less than a romantic relationship." Wait, did they ever get it on in space?

    No. Nowak and Oefelein were never on the same mission, so they couldn't possibly have joined the 62-mile-high club. But some of their colleagues may well have engaged in some extraterrestrial hanky-panky. Former and current astronauts don't like to talk about space-shuttle sex, and NASA says that if it's ever happened, the agency doesn't know anything about it. (NASA has never conducted official experiments on animal reproduction in space, says a spokesman.)

    If astronauts have had space sex, it would have been very difficult. First off, there isn't much privacy up there. A regular shuttle is about as big as a 737, and the two main areas—the crew cabin and middeck—are each the size of a small office. The bathroom is little more than a seat with a curtain, and there aren't any closed rooms where two people could retreat. The space station, on the other hand, has a little more room to operate. The three-person crew generally splits up for sleeping time: Two of them bed down in a pair of tiny crew cabins at one end of the station, and the third might jump in a sleeping bag at the other end, almost 200 feet away. (The panel-and-strap design of a space bed might not be that conducive to lovemaking.) Astronauts also have a demanding work schedule, leaving them with little time or energy for messing around. Space-station crews do get time off on weekends, though, when they can watch movies, read books, play games, "and generally have a good time."

    Of course, speculation has been rampant. The first mission that included both men and women launched in 1982. But on that flight, cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya's reputation for toughness, not to mention her married status, stamped out rumors. The first married couple went to space in 1991, when training-camp sweethearts Jan Davis and Mark Lee served together on a mission. NASA normally has a policy against letting married couples fly together, not because they're afraid they'll have sex, but because it might hurt the team dynamic. However, they made an exception for Davis and Lee since the couple got married so close to launch time. (In this photo, taken during the mission, Lee has his arm around Davis.) Both have refused to answer questions about the nature of their relationship during the mission. In the 1990s, rumors circulated about unorthodox coziness between Elena Kondakova and Valery Polyakov on a mission to the space station Mir, especially after a video got out showing Valery playfully splashing water on Elena during the flight.

    The question of space sex has prompted at least one hoax. In his book The Last Mission, French author Pierre Kohler claimed that NASA had commissioned a study on sexual positions in outer space. He cited a fictional document, widely available online, that describes subjects experimenting with 10 different positions, six of which required an elastic band or sleeping-baglike tube to keep the couple together in zero gravity.

    Which raises the question: Would space sex be any good? Recent research suggests it would not. For one thing, zero gravity can induce nausea—a less-than-promising sign for would-be lovers. Astronauts also perspire a lot in flight, meaning sex without gravity would likely be hot, wet, and surrounded by small droplets of sweat. In addition, people normally experience lower blood pressure in space, which means reduced blood flow, which means … well, you know what that means.

    Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.

    The Explainer thanks Bob Jacobs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Laura Woodmansee, author of Sex in Space.


  • Editorial

    It's the War, Senators

    It is not an inspiring sight to watch the United States Senate turn the most important issue facing America into a political football, and then fumble it. Yet that is what now seems to have come from a once-promising bipartisan effort to finally have the debate about the Iraq war that Americans have been denied for four years.

    The Democrats' ultimate goal was to express the Senate's opposition to President Bush's latest escalation. But the Democrats' leaders have made that more difficult — allowing the Republicans to maneuver them into the embarrassing position of blocking a vote on a counterproposal that they feared too many Democrats might vote for.

    We oppose that resolution, which is essentially a promise never to cut off funds for this or any future military operation Mr. Bush might undertake in Iraq. But the right way for the Senate to debate Iraq is to debate Iraq, not to bar proposals from the floor because they might be passed. The majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, needs to call a timeout and regroup. By changing the issue from Iraq to partisan parliamentary tactics, his leadership team threatens to muddy the message of any anti-escalation resolution the Senate may eventually pass.

    As it happens, the blocked Republican alternative, proposed by Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, itself represents an end run around the Senate's constitutional responsibilities. The rational way to oppose cuts in funds is to vote against them, if and when any ever come before the Senate. Mr. Reid should not be shy about urging fellow Democrats to vote against this hollow gimmick, which tries to make it look as if the senators support Mr. Bush's failed Iraq policies by playing on their fears of being accused of not supporting the troops.

    America went to war without nearly enough public discussion, and it needs more Senate debate about Iraq this time around, not less. The voters who overturned Republican majorities in both houses last November expect, among other things, to see energized Congressional scrutiny of the entire war — not just of the plan for an additional 21,500 troops but also of the future of the 130,000 plus who are already there.

    Another Republican resolution, proposed by Sen. John McCain, gives the appearance of moving in that more promising direction by ticking off a series of policy benchmarks and then urging the Iraqi government to meet them. But listing benchmarks is one thing. It is another to spell out real consequences for not meeting them, like the withdrawal of American military support. Instead of doing that, the McCain resolution hands an unwarranted blank check to Mr. Bush's new Iraq commander, Lt. Gen. David Petraeus. It breathtakingly declares that he "should receive from Congress the full support necessary" to carry out America's mission.

    Frustrated by the Senate's fumbles, the House plans to move ahead next week with its own resolution on Mr. Bush's troop plan. When the Senate is ready to turn its attention back to substance again, it should go further.

    Senators need to acknowledge the reality of four years of failed presidential leadership on Iraq and enact a set of binding benchmarks. These should require the hard steps toward national reconciliation that the Iraqi prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki continues to evade and that the White House refuses to insist on.


     

     

    Panama By Yahoo

    Today could be a major turning point in Yahoo's history. Later today, the company will launch its new online advertising system, called Panama, for all of its ad clients. After a long period of testing, Yahoo will have a system that should help it battle Google for paid search dollars.

    Yahoo has lagged far behind the leader in search advertising. Google has turned that lead into a market cap of one-hundred and fifty billion dollars, and plenty of profits.

    The difference between the two companies has been ad relevance. Yahoo has placed ads in its search pages based on how much advertisers pay for that placement. Google has always delivered ads that depended as much on quality as one keyword price.

    Yahoo is imitating that model, even if C-E-O Terry Semel declines to agree. Ahead of Panama's launch, Yahoo has told its advertisers that the high bid won't always win. If a slightly lower bid with a better quality score is in the mix, that ad may get the top ad spot instead.

    Yahoo needs to turn its advertising fortunes around with Panama, and make its customers and investors happy with the new ad system's performance. If they don't show progress this year, Semel may be tossed out of his corner office.

    Well known marketing professional Andy Beal said no one should be in a hurry to see Panama make an impact on the bottom line. It will take until March to get Panama rolled out completely. When it is operational, Yahoo will expect to see revenue closer to Google's four and a half to five cents per click, instead of the two and a half to three cents it sees now.

    Rafat Ali at Paid Content expects Panama to grow beyond the world of search advertising. He said:

    "(Panama) is intended to be flexible enough eventually to handle video and audio ads and to distribute ads to mobile devices. And while Yahoo gives few specifics, it says Panama will some day play a role beyond search advertising."

    5 Tips To Prepare For Yahoo Panama

    A Long-Delayed Ad System Has Yahoo Crossing Its Fingers

    Yahoo's Panama Ad-Ranking To Launch This Week

    Yahoo Switching to Panama Platform Today

    Yahoo may expect Panama to smack down the threat of Microsoft and its Ad Center service. They better think again. Microsoft thinks Yahoo is arriving late to the party, and Ad Center took all of the door prizes with it when Microsoft left. Ad Center general manager David Jakubowski explained why to WebProNews:

    "Yahoo is catching up with the rest of the industry, by only now adopting quality-based ranking. At the end of the day, Microsoft adCenter is continuing to push the industry beyond what is currently considered the gold standard."

    AdCenter Scoffs At Panama

    Google may not have any plans to discuss about online advertising today, but they have plenty of buzz anyway. Thanks to a blogger's discovery on the Google Docs and Spreadsheets service, we now know Google has another Office like product in the works. It's called Presently, and will allow people to create slide-based presentations like they can do in PowerPoint. Google has since taken down the evidence that was discovered, but not before it was copied and spread to plenty of other web sites.

    Google Works On PowerPoint Clone Presently

    Google Prepares a Presentation Tool

    Google Docs to support PowerPoint…

    The business social network LinkedIn may be thinking of going public. Company co-founder Reid Hoffman stepped down from his C-E-O role in favor of former Intuit executive Dan Nye. Hoffman remains chairman and president of products for LinkedIn. Although some were surprised by the move, LinkedIn spokesperson Kay Luo said in a statement that Hoffman interviewed 72 candidates for the job over the past four months, so this was not a sudden change.

    LinkedIn Loses CEO

    LinkedIn

    LinkedIn gets a new CEO, Hoffman LinksOut

     

     

    Spending Time On MySpace

    Mike Sachoff's picture

    When it comes to where US Internet users are spending the most time MySpace is the leader. The social networking site accounted for 12 percent of all time spent online in December 2006, according to Compete Inc.

    The firm's December 2006 study found that users spent more time at MySpace than other popular sites such as Google, eBay and YouTube. Yahoo was the runner-up to MySpace accounting for 8.5 percent of time spent online by US Internet users.

    The third spot was a tie between msn and eBay with US Internet users spending 3.7 percent of their time on the sites.

    The amount of time spent at MySpace results from users leaving the site open during the day to see when new emails arrive. The multitasking is prevalent among teen users, says Debra Aho Williamson, eMartketer senior analyst and author of the new Multitasking Consumers: Distracted or Connected? report.

    "Several of the sites on the Compete list could easily be used simultaneously: MySpace, Facebook, YouTube and AIM all appeal to the younger generation of Internet users, and this group is also most likely to multitask when online," says Ms. Williamson.

    The younger generation is not the only ones who multitask. Over 80 percent of the time that US adults are emailing, instant-messaging or using the Internet, they are also involved in some other activity according to Ball State University's Center for Media Design.

    According to a study by Veronis Suhler Stevenson, the number of hours spent on the Internet has doubled since 2000; while the number of hours spent watching television has increased only 6 percent in the same time period. Marketers worry that the Internet is taking consumers farther away from their message. This is true to some degree but the issue remains of capturing viewer's undivided attention.

     

     

    Matt Dunham/Associated Press

    The Russian tycoon Boris A. Berezovsky set strict conditions for granting the police an interview.

    February 7, 2007

    Russia Tycoon May Talk to Police on Poisoning

    LONDON, Feb. 6 — Boris A. Berezovsky, an exiled Russian tycoon and bitter opponent of the Kremlin, said Monday that he was prepared to be interviewed by the Russian police investigating the poisoning in London last November of Alexander V. Litvinenko, a dissident former K.G.B. agent he had advised and financed.

    However, in what he called his first newspaper interview since the British police handed a dossier on the case to the Crown Prosecution Service last week, Mr. Berezovsky said that he would talk to Russian investigators only if they met conditions, including being searched for weapons and poisons.

    Mr. Berezovsky spoke in a wide-ranging, 50-minute interview in his offices in Mayfair, a wealthy district of central London, offering some new insights into a tantalizing case that has raised many questions but answered few of them since Mr. Litvinenko, 43, died of radiation poisoning caused by a rare isotope, polonium 210, on Nov. 23.

    Mr. Berezovsky said he believed that Mr. Litvinenko had been the target of two attempts on his life, the first in mid-October. That attempt failed, he said, because too little poison was used. Mr. Berezovsky also disclosed that the prime suspect identified in British news reports had visited him the day before Mr. Litvinenko was poisoned in November and had left a powerful trace of radiation in Mr. Berezovsky's office.

    After the British police started investigating the case, Russian officials announced their own inquiry and said Moscow police officers were awaiting clearance from Britain to come here.

    In a softly lighted and sumptuous suite, Mr. Berezovsky, a former mathematician who amassed huge wealth in business during the Russian presidency of Boris N. Yeltsin in the 1990s, said he was prepared to meet Russian investigators if that would help the British police inquiry, which is widely perceived to have stalled over Russia's resistance to extraditing suspects.

    But Mr. Berezovsky said he would not meet the investigators in the Russian Embassy and would insist that they be searched beforehand.

    "The people from Russia should be investigated for arms and poison," he said, insisting, too, that he would not sign a confidentiality agreement about the discussion. "I don't trust them at all."

    Mr. Berezovsky said he blamed President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia for the killing, a charge the Kremlin has labeled absurd. He said the killers had apparently believed that the cause of death would never be known because British investigators would not be able to identify polonium 210 as the poison. Polonium had been discovered in Mr. Litvinenko's body only three hours before he died, Mr. Berezovsky said.

    The British inquiry has focused on three Russian men who met with Mr. Litvinenko on Nov. 1 at an expensive hotel where the poison is thought to have been slipped into his tea. One of them is Andrei K. Lugovoi, a former K.G.B. agent who Mr. Berezovsky said worked for him after he acquired control of a major television station in Moscow in the 1990s.

    Mr. Berezovsky, 61, fled Russia in 2000 and, after a series of court battles, won political asylum in Britain in 2003. Mr. Litvinenko also left Russia in 2000, and Mr. Berezovsky said he set the former agent up with a house in north London, a salary and school fees for his son.

    Before the killing, however, Mr. Berezovsky said, the two men had agreed to go their separate ways and Mr. Litvinenko had started investigating a range of business deals involving prominent Russians. "Alexander touched something very sensitive," Mr. Berezovsky said, without elaborating.

    When Mr. Litvinenko initially became ill in early November, Mr. Berezovsky said, he told hospital visitors that he believed Mr. Lugovoi was "involved" in the poisoning. Mr. Lugovoi has consistently denied any involvement. Until then, Mr. Berezovsky said, he had no reason to mistrust his former bodyguard and had asked him to arrange security for a daughter visiting Russia last year.

    Last October, when Mr. Lugovoi called him to say he was visiting London for a soccer game, Mr. Berezovsky said, he invited him to his office. "I wanted to tell him thanks a lot for my daughter," Mr. Berezovsky said. "He came to my office."

    But, after Mr. Litvinenko died and the office was scanned for radiation, Mr. Berezovsky said, a chair used by Mr. Lugovoi was found to have high levels of radiation. Mr. Litvinenko also visited Mr. Berezovsky's office, on the day he was poisoned.

    The timing of Mr. Berezovsky's interview apparently reflected a desire by Mr. Litvinenko's family and supporters to keep the case firmly in the public eye when they seemed worried it could fizzle if British authorities did not prosecute. "The basic target is not to allow anybody to stop this case," Mr. Berezovsky said.

    This week, Mr. Litvinenko's widow, Marina, released an open letter to Mr. Putin urging him to bring her husband's killers to justice.


     

    Astronaut Set Out to Kill

    Lisa M. Nowak appears in an afternoon hearing in Orlando. Afterward, she posted bond of $25,500 and was fitted for an ankle bracelet to monitor her movements. She was expected to return home to Houston.

    Photo Orlanda Sentinel via Bloomeberg News Photo by Red Huber

     

    With Discipline Honed by Training, Police Say, Astronaut Set Out to Kill

    By Peter Whoriskey and Daniel de Vise
    Washington Post Staff Writers
    Wednesday, February 7, 2007; A01

    ORLANDO, Feb. 6 -- She prepared for the 950-mile drive from Houston with the discipline of someone who had flown 13 days in space. The steel mallet, folding knife and rubber tube were all catalogued on a handwritten list, police say. She had maps, she had bus schedules and she had a disguise. Thinking like an astronaut, she brought diapers to avoid bathroom stops.

    Lisa M. Nowak set off for Orlando International Airport seven months after the July 4 launch of the shuttle Discovery, her first trip to space, and probably her last.

    The NASA astronaut and Navy captain from Rockville was charged Tuesday with the attempted murder in Orlando of an apparent rival for the affections of another astronaut. Nowak, one of 46 women to fly in a space shuttle, is now the first active astronaut to be arrested on a felony charge. She left an Orlando jail Tuesday afternoon with her jacket pulled over her head.

    Police said Nowak, 43, stalked the younger woman, 30-year-old Air Force Capt. Colleen Shipman, at an airport parking lot early Monday, dressed in a dark wig, glasses and a tan hooded trench coat. Unable to gain Shipman's confidence, police said, she sprayed her with pepper spray through Shipman's partially open car window before the car sped away.

    According to a charging document, she intended to confront Shipman about her relationship with Navy Cmdr. William A. Oefelein, an astronaut who, like Nowak, is based at Johnson Space Center in Houston. Nowak, who is married with a teenage son and twin daughters, told police she and Oefelein had "more than a working relationship but less than a romantic relationship," according to the document. Nowak carried with her e-mails from Shipman to Oefelein.

    In a request Shipman filed for an injunction against Nowak, Shipman said she had been stalked for about two months.

    Neither Shipman nor Oefelein could be reached by phone Tuesday. Oefelein, born in Fort Belvoir, is 41 and has two children. He piloted Discovery to the international space station in December.

    Nowak might have been planning the confrontation as early as Jan. 23, the day she printed the maps she used to navigate from Texas to Florida, according to a police affidavit. She had obtained a copy of Shipman's flight plans to Orlando.

    The affidavit provides this account:

    Nowak checked into a La Quinta Inn in Orlando under a false name, stashed her car and set off to meet Shipman's midnight flight from Houston to Orlando. The younger officer was returning to Patrick Air Force Base in Florida.

    Shipman picked up her luggage, which was late, about 3 a.m. As she waited for the bus to the airport satellite parking lot, Nowak lingered at a nearby taxi stop, wearing the wig and a trench coat. When Shipman boarded the bus, Nowak boarded, too. She got off where Shipman did. Nowak was armed with a steel mallet, a buck knife and a BB gun that resembled a real 9mm semiautomatic handgun. The BB gun was loaded with pellets and was set to fire, according to the affidavit.

    Walking to her car, Shipman sensed a threat. She heard "running footsteps" behind her. She jumped into her car, locking the door.

    But before she could pull away, Nowak slapped at the window. Then she pulled at the locked door.

    "Can you help me please?" Nowak told her, according to the affidavit. "My boyfriend was supposed to pick me up, and he is not here. I've been traveling and it's late. Can you give me a ride to the parking office?"

    Shipman said she'd send someone to help. Nowak asked to use Shipman's cellphone. Shipman told her the battery was dead. Nowak said she could not hear Shipman through the window, then began to cry.

    Shipman opened her window two inches. Nowak sprayed something, later determined to be pepper spray, into the opened window, aiming at Shipman's face. Shipman drove away, her eyes burning, and sought help, according to police.

    Police and prosecutors say the evidence suggests that Nowak might have wanted to get into Shipman's car and kill her, possibly at Shipman's house.

    Citing other details -- the handwritten list, an assumed name -- prosecutor Amanda Cowan likened Nowak's planning for the trip to the kind of preparations astronauts make as they ready for space.

    "She had a mission that she was very determined to carry out," she said.

    Last summer, Nowak was literally on top of the world, one of the very few chosen to fly on the space shuttle to the international space station. She flew on Discovery in July as a mission specialist and operated one of the space station's robotic arms, a job that requires intensive training.

    "It was such a high to see her get on the shuttle," said Dennis Alloy of Vienna, a childhood friend who watched it lift off. "It's such a shame."

    Nowak performed "extremely well" on that first mission, said David Mould, a NASA spokesman. She was scheduled to be a capsule communications officer for the next shuttle flight in March, to serve as the conduit between Houston's Mission Control and the astronauts.

    As of Tuesday, Nowak was off NASA's prestigious "flight status" list and was on a 30-day leave.

    "We are deeply saddened by this tragic event," said Michael L. Coats, director of Johnson Space Center. "The charges against Lisa Nowak are serious ones that must be decided by the judicial system."

    Neither Nowak nor her attorney, Donald Lykkebak of Orlando, offered any alternate version of events.

    But in hearings Tuesday, Lykkebak took issue with police conclusions that Nowak intended to kill or kidnap Shipman. He said she was simply trying to talk to Shipman.

    "What we have here is a desperate woman who wants to have a conversation with another woman," he said in the afternoon hearing. "She doesn't shoot her. She doesn't stab her. . . . I would submit to you that she wanted to talk."

    Nowak's boss, Chief Astronaut Steven W. Lindsey from Johnson Space Center, came to Orlando and appeared at both court hearings.

    "We're here representing NASA, and our main concern is Lisa's health and well-being and to make sure she's safe and we get her through this and we get her back to a safe place with her family," he said at the morning hearing.

    But by the end of the afternoon hearing, the judge had raised Nowak's bond to $25,500, in addition to the condition that she be monitored via a Global Positioning System anklet, for which she will pay $15 a day. By evening, she had posted bond and was preparing to be fitted with the anklet. She was expected to return to Houston.

    Lisa Marie Caputo Nowak grew up in the Luxmanor neighborhood of Rockville, in a two-story red brick house on Tilden Lane.

    Her family in Rockville released a statement late Tuesday. It noted that Nowak and her husband separated a few weeks ago. "We love her very much, and right now, our primary focus is on her health and well-being," the statement said. "Considering both her personal and professional life, these alleged events are completely out of character."

    Nowak was co-valedictorian of Charles W. Woodward High School in Rockville and received a master's degree in aeronautical engineering before becoming a full-fledged astronaut in 1998. She attended U.S. Naval Test Pilot School at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station in St. Mary's County and flew as a test pilot in the mid-1990s. Oefelein attended the U.S. Navy Fighter Weapons School and was also at the test pilot school at Patuxent.

    In the fall, Nowak captivated audiences at Luxmanor Elementary School and Tilden Middle in Rockville and at the U.S. Naval Academy, all schools she once attended, and her sisters' alma mater, Stone Ridge School of the Sacred Heart in Bethesda, with tales of space. It was a living lesson that hard work pays off.

    "All these little girls were lining up to sign autographs," said Matthew Schatzle, a 1985 class officer, recounting the Naval Academy visit. "She represents us. She represents the Navy. She represents NASA. She represents her family. I'm sure she's devastated."

    De Vise reported from Washington. Staff writers Chris Jenkins, Marc Kaufman, Moira E. McLaughlin, Katherine Shaver and Steve Vogel and staff researcher Eddy Palanzo contributed to this report from Washington.

    Scott Audette/Reuters


    Cmdr. William Oefelein and Capt. Lisa Nowak in winter training in Valcartier, Quebec, in January 2004.

    NASA via Associated Press

    NASA's portrait of Lisa Nowak

    February 7, 2007

    From Spaceflight to Attempted Murder Charge

    Like most of today's astronauts, Lisa Marie Nowak worked in relative obscurity — even last July, when she took the spaceflight that she had spent 10 years at NASA hoping for.

    She is famous now, the smiling image of her in astronaut gear a sharp contrast with her police mugshot, a woman with wild hair wearing an expression of personal devastation.

    She is charged with the attempted murder of a woman she believed to be her rival for the affections of a fellow astronaut. Police officials say she drove 900 miles to Florida from Texas, wearing a diaper so she would not have to stop for rest breaks. In Orlando, they say, she confronted her rival in a parking lot, attacking her with pepper spray.

    Captain Nowak was in disguise at the time, wearing a wig, the police said. She had with her a compressed air pistol, a steel mallet, a knife, pepper spray, four feet of rubber tubing, latex gloves and garbage bags.

    Those who know her say they are mystified. "I was in shock," said Dennis Alloy, 43, of Tysons Corner, Va., a friend and high school classmate. "When I knew her, I couldn't imagine an evil bone in her body."

    Many inside and outside the space agency are wondering how the problems of Captain Nowak, who graduated from the Naval Academy in 1985 and served in the Navy before joining National Aeronautics and Space Administration, were not detected before this. Many are also wondering whether the "Right Stuff" image of astronauts has been tarnished, or if that image somehow confused technical excellence with emotional stability.

    "Like any other people, they're human," said George Abbey, director of the Johnson Space Center when Commander Nowak was selected for the astronaut corps, who recalled her as "an outstanding candidate."

    Captain Nowak, 43, was arrested at 4 a.m. Monday at Orlando International Airport, the police said, after attacking the other woman, Capt. Colleen Shipman of the Air Force.

    According to the police report, by Detective William C. Becton, Captain Nowak said that she had not intended to harm Captain Shipman and that she believed that "this was the only time she was going to be able to speak" with her. The compressed air pistol she carried "was going to be used to entice Ms. Shipman to talk with her," according to the report.

    Detective Becton wrote, "When I asked Mrs. Nowak if she thought the pepper spray was going to help her speak with Ms. Shipman, she replied, 'That was stupid.' "

    According to the police report, Captain Nowak said she saw Captain Shipman, 30, as a rival for the affection of Cmdr. William A. Oefelein, a fellow astronaut. She told the police that she and Commander Oefelein, whose NASA nickname is Billy-O, had "more than a working relationship but less than a romantic relationship." Commander Oefelein, 41, is divorced and has two children.

    Tuesday was a day of confusion and quickly shifting events. Captain Nowak, a married mother of three, was brought before a judge for arraignment at 8:30 a.m. Two of her fellow astronauts — the chief of NASA's astronaut office, Col. Steven W. Lindsey of the Air Force, and Capt. Christopher J. Ferguson of the Navy — were there to offer support.

    The judge had agreed to release Captain Nowak on $15,000 bond on charges of kidnapping and battery, but the police added a charge of attempted murder, and bail was increased to $25,000.

    Captain Shipman is seeking a protective order against Captain Nowak, according to documents posted on the Web site of The Orlando Sentinel, which broke the story Monday night.

    In Orlando at the end of the day, Captain Nowak posted bail and later in the evening was fitted with an electronic ankle bracelet so her movements could be monitored after her return to Houston.

    "She's is going home," said her lawyer , Donald Lykkebak.

    Captain Nowak and her husband, Richard, a flight controller for the International Space Station, live with their children in a two-story brick-and-glass home in Houston.

    Few neighbors there wanted to talk about the case, but one, who asked that his name not be used, said the couple had an argument in November with raised voices and the sound of breaking china.

    No one was home on Tuesday.

    A statement from the family last night on the Sentinel Web site said that the Nowaks had been married for 19 years but that Captain Nowak and her husband "had separated a few weeks ago."

    Earlier in the day, Michael Coats, the director of the Johnson Space Center, said in a statement: "We are deeply saddened by this tragic event. The charges against Lisa Nowak are serious ones that must be decided by the judicial system."

    Mr. Coats said Captain Nowak was "officially on 30-day leave and has been removed from flight status and all mission-related activities."

    How could a person involved in such a case rise within the space agency, which is famous for its psychological screening of astronaut candidates?

    Nick Kanas, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, who has studied astronaut psychology, said that the screening occurs only at the very beginning of the process and that once an astronaut has gotten through the front door, the formal psychological evaluations give way to evaluation of job performance. Psychological counseling is available but not mandatory, he said.

    "We can screen out very serious stuff, but we can't always predict the future," Professor Kanas said, and "people change over time."

    Captain Nowak first came to the space program in April 1996 and finally flew aboard the space shuttle in July 2006.

    During the 13-day flight of the shuttle Discovery, which was launched on July 4 of last year, she operated the robot arm during spacewalks with her crewmate Stephanie D. Wilson, earning them the shared nickname Robo Chicks.

    As an astronaut she performed roles including capcom, the astronaut who communicates with orbiting space station crews.

    Professor Kanas said that most astronauts went through the experience of finally reaching space and came out well but that "for some it's very difficult to adjust" to seeing the abrupt end of something they have worked so hard to achieve.

    "These people are extremely well-suited, by personality and training, to deal with the stresses of being in space," Professor Kanas said. But, he added, "that doesn't mean that they're not vulnerable to emotional problems, or problems in their relationships."

    Today's astronauts find themselves in a world much less glamorous than the original crews. While the Mercury Seven raced Corvettes, today's family-oriented fliers are likelier to tool around in minivans. They spend much more time in suburbia than in orbit, and there are no more ticker-tape parades for the returning heroes.

    Some former officials of the space program said that romantic thoughts and even love triangles were not unknown to the program but that it was up to management to watch carefully and intervene.

    Mr. Abbey, the former Johnson Space Center director, said, "You've got some hard-charging people, and you need to manage them." Problems like this "don't happen overnight," and so "you have to be sensitive to what your people are doing."

    Now and then on his watch, he recalled, "I stepped in, and people weren't happy about it," he recalled, but it was important to tell them that "what you're doing is not a personal thing for you — it's affecting a lot of people around you, and affecting your performance."

    Christopher Kraft, NASA's original flight director, said he was surprised. If someone was slipping toward such trouble, Mr. Kraft said, "your fellow crew members would pick that up."

    Captain Nowak's use of a diaper on the long drive to Florida is no mystery to astronauts. Mike Mullane, a retired astronaut, said many astronauts wear a device — "we call them urine collection devices" — during launching, landing and spacewalks, "when you're in a pressure suit and cannot get to a toilet."

    Other mysteries in the case could be more persistent. Michael Stone, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons, said he was struck by the thoroughness of Captain Nowak's preparation, which he said was generally "a guy thing."

    "It's extraordinarily rare for a woman to do this type of a crime," Professor Stone said. He said the more customary response was to try to kill the object of affection, as Jean Harris shot Herman Tarnower in 1980. "This is really close to unique in the annals of female crime," he said.

    Ralph Blumenthal, Rachel Mosteller and Maureen Balleza contributed from Houston, Melody Simmons from Baltimore, Sonia Chopra from Orlando, and Stefano Coledan from Cape Canaveral.


    Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company

     

     

    Today's Papers

    Main Man
    By Daniel Politi
    Posted Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007, at 5:10 AM E.T.

    The New York Times leads with word that senior military officers have warned any new strategy for Iraq runs a high risk of failure if there isn't more involvement from civilian agencies. These military officers, including members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, contend that no amount of military intervention will help Iraq if it doesn't include a concerted effort to speed up the country's reconstruction and political development. The Washington Post leads with a look at how Gen. David H. Petraeus has become the public face of the administration's effort to convince lawmakers and the public to give "surge" a chance. The Wall Street Journal tops its world-wide newsbox with Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives announcing they will hold a vote next week on a resolution opposing the administration's new plans for Iraq. Meanwhile, House members began "what promises to be a long, embarrassing inquest" into mismanagement of rebuilding funds in Iraq.

    The Los Angeles Times leads with a look at the "unusually open campaign" being waged by Israel to get the international community to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. USA Today leads with at least six states (Texas, Virginia, Tennessee, Missouri, Georgia, and Utah) that are considering expanding the use of the death penalty. Some, for example, want child molesters to be eligible for the death penalty, while others want to lower the bar of when certain offences become eligible for the death penalty.

    There have been long-running tensions between the State Department and the Pentagon, and these have only increased with a feeling that the military will bear most of the blame if Bush's new plan for Iraq fails. Gates told senators yesterday he agreed with the concerns expressed by the officers and emphasized that Bush told his Cabinet on Monday that civilian agencies must "step up to the task." Part of the problem is that although the State Department has been ordered to speed up reconstruction efforts, it can't exactly force diplomats to accept taking a job in Iraq. At the end of the article, the Times mentions a recent classified study that found violence in Baghdad falls when quality of life improves.

    Before leaving for Baghdad, Petraeus parked himself in Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's office and pitched the administration's plans to any lawmakers who would listen. "The Petraeus card is about the only one left to play for a White House confronting low poll numbers, an unpopular war and an opposition Congress," says the Post. Although the White House insists it did not plan the post-confirmation visits to Capitol Hill, Bush has tried to persuade lawmakers it doesn't make sense to speak up against his new plan for Iraq and confirm Petraeus.

    Israeli politicians and military leaders have said there could be a "second Holocaust" if the world does nothing to prevent a country that has declared war against the Jews from developing nuclear weapons. Some leaders, including Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have also hinted publicly that Israel would be willing to use force if the international community is unwilling (or unable) to prevent a nuclear Iran.

    But there appear to be some hints the current sanctions might be working to weaken Iran, at least economically. USAT says inside that figures have begun to show the "deepening economic isolation" of Iran as it faces increased inflation and unemployment.

    All the papers mention Iran accusing U.S. forces of being behind the abduction of an Iranian diplomat in Baghdad. Iranian officials said gunmen wearing Iraqi military uniforms kidnapped their embassy's second secretary on Sunday (the NYT had the story of the abduction yesterday). U.S. officials deny they were involved.

    In other Iraq news, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said delays in implementing the new security plan are hurting his credibility with the Iraqi people. "This delay is giving a negative impression and has led some people to say that we have already failed," Maliki said.

    The LAT fronts a different angle from the Gates Senate hearing, where the defense secretary said the Pentagon is working on an alternative plan if the troop increase fails to provide adequate results. Gates did not go into detail, but he emphasized that Bush's plan "is not the last chance" to save Iraq.

    Everybody goes inside with a cockpit video leaked to a British newspaper that shows two American pilots in Iraq reacting to the news they had just shot at British troops and killed one of them. Moments after they fired, the pilots got the news and immediately started cursing and weeping. "I'm going to be sick," said one of the pilots. "We're in jail, dude." The Pentagon, reversing a previous decision, announced it would allow the video to be shown in a British court.

    All the papers mention that Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday and defended the recent firings of several U.S. attorneys, saying they were not politically motivated. McNulty said most were asked to leave because of poor performance, but he recognized that a U.S. attorney in Arkansas was urged to leave without cause and the job was given to a former aide to presidential adviser Karl Rove.

    Everyone fronts stories about Navy Capt. Lisa Marie Nowak, who has quickly become one of the most famous NASA astronauts in recent memory. The LAT managed to catch the basics of the story yesterday, but it gets stranger with every new detail that emerges. Nowak was charged with the attempted murder of a woman she saw as her rival for the affections of another astronaut.

    The WSJ, USAT, and LAT front Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs calling on record companies to do away with restrictions currently present in legally downloaded music. In an essay posted online, Jobs argues that the restrictions haven't actually prevented people from illegally obtaining music and all they do is inconvenience customers who choose to get their music legally.

    Daniel Politi writes "Today's Papers" for Slate. He can be reached at todayspapers@slate.com.

  •  

    Hiroko Masuike for The New York Times

    TOE ROW The coddled feet of, from left, Alexandra, 11; Ellen, 46; and Amanda Crown, 14

    Forum: Fashion and Style

    Hiroko Masuike for The New York Times

    GROWN-UP TIME Top, Ellen Crown with Alexandra, center, 11, and Amanda, 14, at John Frieda. Above, Emma Glennon spends time with her mother, Fran, at Sothys Spa.

    February 1, 2007

    And for My Princess, a Pedicure

    ON a warm massage table at Sothys Spa, far from the January chill, Fran Glennon, 52, was cocooned in white terry cloth and enjoying a facial. On another massage table, about five feet away, was a smaller cocoon: Ms. Glennon's daughter, Emma, 9.

    Emma, of course, did not need blackhead extraction or steam to open clogged pores or a massage to stimulate the skin stretched across her delicate little face. Instead, Emma's aesthetician gently applied to her forehead, nose and cheeks lotions made with mineral water from the city of Spa in eastern Belgium.

    "How do you feel?" asked Zina Bekenshtein, the aesthetician, after a mask was rinsed from Emma's face and a damp cloth peeled from her eyes.

    A sleepy looking Emma grinned and half-whispered: "Gooood."

    More and more, little girls like Emma are participating in activities that their own mothers might not have experienced until they were adults. It is not unusual to walk into a salon and be seated next to a preadolescent girl whose twiggy legs barely reach the pedicure tub or to be dining at a fancy restaurant near a second grader or to encounter a 6-year-old in the gym locker room.

    Places once considered adult domains — spas, gyms, restaurants and nail and hair salons — are increasingly becoming destinations for little girls and their mothers.

    Samantha White, 28, an assistant at a business consulting firm in Manhattan, said she has noticed more little girls coming in with their mothers to her nail salon, picking out a color and sitting back for the pampering.

    "My roommate has a niece who is 7, and she was telling me that every Saturday at 9 a.m. they get manicures," Ms. White said. "She had a design on her index finger."

    The trend is driven in part by a lack of time. Hectic scheduling for parents and children alike makes it challenging for mothers to carve out time for bonding activities, particularly ones that appeal to tweens who by 12 consider monkey bars and Kool-Aid quaint relics of their past.

    "Between her activities, my work, you end up trying to fit it all in," said Ms. Glennon, a nurse, as she and Emma sat in the spa's cafe. "We're all so busy. Here you're out of the house so you really can focus on each other. You're spending time together."

    Emma was 3 when Ms. Glennon first took her along to her nail salon because she thought it would be silly to pay for a baby sitter. Now she takes Emma to the spa for the occasional treat.

    Like many other mothers, Ms. Glennon cherishes those outings because she knows that all too soon her little girl will be a teenager and no longer consider it a thrill to follow her everywhere.

    Trena Ross, the spa director of Sothys, added that taking tweens to the spa has become a tidy way to eliminate the mommy "guilt factor."

    Ms. Ross explained: "I want to spend spa time for myself. I want to spend time with my daughter. Why not get both in one?"

    The trend is also the result of what psychologists say is an emphasis on precociousness.

    "Today's teens are mature teens," said Michael Wood, the vice president of Teenage Research Unlimited. "They are interested in some of those very grown-up activities."

    That has become a boon for spas, with an increase in business drawn by treatments like My First Manicure, My First Massage and My First Facial, as well as Cinderella Treat and Princess Fizzing Manicure. A spokeswoman for the Ritz-Carlton Orlando, Grande Lakes, said mother-daughter spa business has doubled since 2003.

    But to bond at these places requires disposable income. At Sothys, the mini-facial for children is $75 (a deep-cleansing facial with exfoliation for adults is $110), and a package that includes a children's facial, manicure and pedicure can cost $127. (Still, it is possible to get a $10 manicure at a corner salon.)

    But is it healthy for young girls to be dipping a toe into traditionally adult activities? What rites of passage will they have left to look forward to?

    Mothers seeking girly time with their daughters at the spa, salon or gym say they have concluded that the benefits — intimate conversations, shared relaxation, lessons about hygiene, escape from school and family woes — outweigh the potential pitfalls.

    Besides, they say, those activities are not the only time they spend with their daughters. There are sleepovers and museum trips and hours playing with the family pet, too.

    Psychologists say the assimilation of young girls into adult realms is not a cut-and-dried issue, especially when the activity involves beauty.

    Roni Cohen-Sandler, a psychologist in Weston, Conn., and the author of "Stressed-Out Girls: Helping Them Thrive in the Age of Pressure," said there is no "magic age" that determines what is appropriate.

    "These young tweens are growing up with an expectation of doing things earlier and earlier," Dr. Cohen-Sandler said, "and in some ways it's robbing many of them of that carefree childhood time when they don't have to be thinking of how they look."

    But Dr. Cohen-Sandler said going to a salon for a manicure is actually less harmful at age 5 than at 10 because at 5, "it's clear to the girls that they are playing grown-up, it's pretend."

    There is nothing wrong with relishing relaxation and "grown-up" time with one's mother, she said. But if it leads to obsessing about one's body and expecting pampering, it can be a problem.

    In general, rites of passage involving beauty treatments should accompany puberty, she said. And they should not be things a time-strapped mother grants her daughter because she wants to be seen as fun."I'm not an advocate of a cool mother," Dr. Cohen-Sandler said.

    Linda Carter, the director of the family studies program at the New York University Child Study Center, said it is easy to be critical of the mother who takes her daughter to the manicurist, but what matters, she said, is the mother's intention and how the child interprets it.

    However, Dr. Carter cautioned: "If every bonding time is over the manicure table or shopping, then it gives a consistent message that could become a concern. But the occasional manicure? We've all done that."

    Some mothers say that their goal of bonding over these grown-up activities works.

    Beth Short of Pittsburgh debated about when to allow her daughters, now 14 and 17, to receive facials at ESSpa Kozmetika, the spa she frequents. She wanted to teach the girls, then 10 and 13, about skin care, especially after one came back from tennis camp with skin problems. But she wondered if introducing young girls to spa culture was too "froufrou."

    Ultimately, she decided to let them try it and soon found that the experience resulted in more than improved hygiene.

    "She talked a little bit more about other girls and friendships and just how she felt about herself," Ms. Short said about one daughter. "It was a little bit deeper. I just felt she was more relaxed and more open."

    Naturally, there are people who resent having their spa, gym or salon infiltrated by yammering pint-size patrons. And some of them are mothers themselves.

    Sherry Davey, who has a daughter, Lily, 4, and a blog called Funny Mom on iVillage.com, said she has developed what she calls a "mommy callus," which makes her more immune than most to tween riots. And yet.

    "It's like an invasion," said Ms. Davey, recalling with a laugh a group of 8-year-old girls who walked in while she was having her own biweekly manicure in a Brooklyn salon. "It's adult private time. You kind of want to chill out."

    What also irks some observers is how willing some parents are to drop money on indulgences that children cannot fully appreciate. That gripe taps into a bigger idea about the danger of transforming tweens into material girls.

    "It does sort of run the risk of prizing the materialistic over the positive attention and the time together," said Melba J. Nicholson, a child and family therapist at the Family Institute at Northwestern University, who generally approves of bonding at the spa, gym or salon.

    To keep it healthy, she said mothers should emphasize to their daughters that the hours they share in these places are more significant than the money spent there. And, she said, "It offers an opportunity to teach her about financial management," adding that a mother might try to explain that "we're doing this because I have extra money in the budget."

    Sometimes, however, these outings are truly healing. "We have a family whose dad died tragically," said Eva Sztupka-Kerschbaumer, the owner of ESSpa. Four months later the mother came to the spa with her two daughters. "She said it was great," Ms. Sztupka-Kerschbaumer said. "They were able to talk about different things other than just the tragedy."

    Other times, such mother-daughter experiences are a reward. About once a month, Ellen Crown, 46, and her daughters, Alexandra, 11, and Amanda, 14, visit John Frieda Salon on Madison Avenue for scented June Jacobs peppermint pedicures. It is Mrs. Crown's gift to her girls for doing well in school or volunteering.

    The experience is also something of a fantasy. Not for the girls, but for Mrs. Crown.

    "When you dream of having a little girl, things flash in your mind," she said.

    Or, as Alexandra put it as a nail technician applied a color called Pink Diamond to her pebble-size toenails: "We can talk about girl stuff."


    Techie's Cyber Odyssey

    A computer, at right, built from scratch by Edward Rothstein, and a monitor with a wallpaper image from Microsoft Vista

    Like cards in a floating deck: A feature of Microsoft Vista allows viewers to flip through all open windows

    February 7, 2007
    Connections

    Techie's Cyber Odyssey: Magic in Bits and Bolts

    I know what Microsoft wants. I know because I have been exploring its new operating system, Vista, which was released last week after five years of false starts, persistent bugs and great expectations. I also know because after spending three weeks building a computer from scratch to test out Vista, piecing the PC together from parts bought online, I want the same thing. What we want is to eliminate the PC altogether, to dismantle that box of green circuit boards and crammed-in wires, to break through even the most glorious flat-screen monitor and open up a new ... vista.

    That's why the operating system has its name, of course, and why the screen images it includes show exotic landscapes with skies lit by sunset or sunrise or aurora borealis displays. These are not glimpses of hackers' paradises or techie wonderlands. They are the opposite, showing landscapes beyond technology's reach, offering not the streaming green cryptograms of "The Matrix" but wilderness vistas free of civilization, promising not ones and zeros but pristine water and sky. Windows was once thought of as a virtual "desktop"; now it opens onto untrammeled nature. Escape from technology through technology. That, at least, is the fantasy.

    Such imagery is important here. Microsoft became a cultural as well as a technological force because of that kind of imagination. It began with the dullest and most arcane aspect of computer management: the operating system, which is little more than a monitoring program in charge of helping other programs get their work done, guiding them to devices they need, helping them interact, overseeing the traffic. Microsoft then took the old, serviceable monochrome PC of the 1980s that could handle only one task at a time, and that seemed immune from the frivolity of fonts and pictures (which were in Apple's domain).

    And Microsoft began, over years of crashes and controversies, to fashion something else out of this software and hardware until it could leave those technological origins behind. Microsoft has been aspiring to transcendence. Its ambition is to destroy the PC.

    That is a noble goal, I think, particularly after my experience of building a computer: a hobbyist's nightmare, it might have seemed from the piles of boxes and bubble wrap, the colored cables and seemingly interchangeable pieces of industrial circuitry, the Medusa-headed power supply with its score of snakelike wires, the motherboard with its delicate protrusions and fine screws.

    I must not be alone in this fascination with handiwork as the origins of technology, though I completed the project too soon to benefit from the careful pointers in the newest edition of "Building the Perfect PC," by Robert Bruce Thompson and Barbara Fritchman Thompson (O'Reilly, 2006). But it didn't matter: for a while, amid the mess of the material world, I was a human incarnation of an operating system, selecting the pieces that mattered, binding them together, determining their placement, testing each one, sending out error messages (and complaints) to companies that sent faulty parts. I threaded wires through small holes, carefully fitted miniature plugs onto minuscule prongs, worried over heat produced by the computer's churning calculations yet to come.

    I like the science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke's famous dictum that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Here, sufficiently crude technology seemed indistinguishable from carpentry — or plumbing. The chip and board designers — Intel and Nvidia — were the real creative forces, determining the logic of this construction. But at a certain point, when I tried to remove a tiny piece of plastic that fit over two prongs and move it to another two while squeezing my fingers between two intertwined cables, the computer's primitiveness became overwhelmingly clear.

    Three decades ago, one less powerful would have filled a room, so I didn't lack appreciation for the technological marvel, but the crudity of the operations made it seem as if I were striking flint to run an M.R.I. The contemporary PC, for all its abilities, is like a hand-cranked Model T of what might yet come.

    Techne, that's what it was: the Greek activity of craft, of making things. Hence, technology. But one aspect of contemporary technology is that it almost eliminates any sense of techne. A half-century ago, hot-rodders could take apart a car engine and see how it worked, how spark plugs ignited vaporized gasoline and pushed pistons.

    With circuit boards there's no clue. No wonder computers like the one I've made (and now write with) allow users to play with the voltages and speeds of components so they can jack up the processing or memory, "overclock" the PC and feel that they have indeed added something to the construction.

    But most users dread turning a crank or pulling a spark plug. The real problem with contemporary technology is not when it hides techne, but when it fails to, when it forces its users to apply axle grease or dig around in the muck of detail. That is partly what an operating system is supposed to prevent. It hides the boggling bookkeeping that is required for each step the computer takes.

    How much more astonishing, then, is what Microsoft has accomplished. Apple had it easy: it kept its PC box closed, maintaining control over the hardware so it would perfectly suit its software. But Microsoft faced hundreds of thousands of boards, drives and chips like those I had spread out before me a few weeks ago, all of differing technological vintages, made by hundreds of companies with wildly different goals. Microsoft has taken these objects, along with the many thousands of PC programs now sold, and tried to create a system that would overlook their dizzying differences, bind them to a coherent vision and force them, in all their variety, to leave techne behind for the uncharted possibilities of magic.

    No need to point out that in Vista, the ambition is necessarily unfulfilled. (I've already found problems some techne-minded team at Microsoft should address, and not every product advertising its Vista-readiness is really ready.) But the progress is unmistakable, which is why Vista can get away with its evocation of immateriality; it almost becomes plausible.

    Windows don't simply minimize; they sort of glide away as they shrink. The screen's once staid borders and buttons are given a three-dimensional glossiness; hints of transparency and glints of reflections make controls and icons glimmer with light. Microsoft calls the effect Aero, and it manages to be both ethereal and busy, like much else in this operating system, which — if the equipment is powerful enough — slips rather than snaps into place. Commands are turned into gesture.

    Half magic, let us say, because I've had my problems amid the pleasures. But in the meantime, under the pressure, the PC too seems to be dissolving around the edges. Seven years ago, during the Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft, the judicial "findings of fact" casually suggested that PCs are not necessarily used for Internet access; now it is difficult to find a PC that is not. In fact, the most intrusive aspects of Vista involve its persistent attempts to protect the computer from intrusion, to prevent violation from that risky expanse beyond its boundaries.

    Internally, borders of the computer have changed as well, making many other pronouncements in the findings seem naïve. The PC is now audio system, television, video player and game machine, a shape-shifting object that the operating system must manage and manipulate. It is just as well that we don't often become aware of how primitive the computer behind the curtain really is, or we might start to believe that its achievements really are a form of magic and not the product of laborious and meticulous techne.

    Connections, a critic's perspective on the arts, appears every other week.


     
    Enough already. I’m Troy, a gay sheep





    SHEEPISH
    by Paul Rudnick
    Issue of 2007-02-12
    Posted 2007-02-05

    Charles Roselli set out to discover what makes some sheep gay. Then the news media and the blogosphere got hold of the story.
    The Times.


    Enough already. I'm Troy, a gay sheep, and I'll tell you the truth. Although I'm conflicted about calling myself a gay sheep, because I don't like to think that my sexuality defines me; let's just say that I'm a sheep who happens to be gay. Being gay is just a simple biological fact, like having a fleecy undercoat or bleating while you're being shorn, or getting aroused whenever you see a bulky turtleneck sweater.

    When I was growing up, I assumed that I'd be just like everybody else, and that someday I'd be bred with a ewe and slaughtered. But, of course, those other feelings were always there; even when I was only a few years old I would gaze at another male lamb and think about sharing a stall, with just enough hay and maybe a nice mid-century trough. I tried not to focus on my urges, and whenever my mom caught me rubbing up against the fence post that I called Skipper I'd pretend I had lice. But as the years went by I started to act on my desires, first with Ed, who was a ram, if you know what I mean. Later, I became involved with Rick, a sheep my own age, although after our encounters Rick would always claim that he was drunk on compost, and he'd butt me with his head and insist, "Dude, let's go get us some mutton."

    Finally, my dad found me with Rick, and he flew into a blind rage, yelling that he had no son, and that if I was lucky I'd end up as a cheap Peruvian cardigan worn by a truck-stop hooker in Alaska. And so I ran away, and I went wild. I experimented with everyone and everything. Bulls. Mules. Duck, duck, goose. I found out exactly why they're called the Three Little Pigs. Call me Old McDonald, because I had the farm. I even made some adult films, and maybe you've heard of them: "Wet Wool," "Lassie, Come Here," and the mega-selling "Hoof and Mouth." Then, one morning, I woke up next to a horse, a hen, and an ear of corn—that's right, all the food groups. And I was disgusted with myself. What was I, livestock?

    And so I re-joined my flock, up on Brokeback. I didn't expect to be accepted; I just needed some time to graze and grow. I had some terrific long talks with a wise old mountain goat, who told me, "Look, you can be anything you want to be—gay, straight, pashmina, whatever." And I found my faith again, when I realized that, hey, there were sheep on the ark. There were sheep in the manger. And at the Last Supper there was stew.

    At long last, I found the strength to come out to my family, my friends, and even my co-workers, to say right out loud, I'm Troy and I'm gay, but I hope that isn't the most interesting thing about me. I'm just like you: I like to stand around in the rain and get caught in barbed wire and defecate while I'm asleep. And the amazing thing was—it was no big deal. Everyone nuzzled me, and my mom said that deep down she'd always known, and that she'd hoped that I'd grow up to be an artist or a performer or a cashmere crewneck. Of course, Little Bo Peep, my shepherdess, got a little teary at first. "Are you sure?" she wondered. "I mean, you're so masculine." And I informed her that being gay doesn't mean you have to act like a hummingbird or a Chihuahua. And then she asked, very confidentially, "Is it true about Elsie the cow? And Ellen?" And I just rolled my eyes and said, "Darling."

    Right about then is when I met Doug. I saw him across the pasture, and I just knew. I assumed there'd be talk—he's a black sheep. And, I'll confess, I used the oldest line in the barn. I sidled right up to him and I said, "Baa baa, black sheep, have you any wool?" And he looked me right in the eye and murmured, "Yes, sir, yes, sir, three bags full." And I replied, "I can see that." We've been together ever since, and we don't care what anyone thinks. Because, baby, at the end of the day we're all just animals.

    Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Darwin’s neglected double.




    MISSING LINK
    by JONATHAN ROSEN
    Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Darwin's neglected double.
    Issue of 2007-02-12
    Posted 2007-02-05

    When he was twenty-four years old, Alfred Russel Wallace, the greatest field biologist of the nineteenth century, had his head examined by a phrenologist who determined that, while his "organ of wonder" was very big, his "organ of veneration," representing respect for authority, was noticeably small. Wallace was so struck with the accuracy of this report that, sixty years later, he mentioned it in his autobiography. It was wonder that drew him to nature, and an instinctive disregard for authority that made it easy to challenge an entire civilization's religious convictions, as he did when, in 1858, he dashed off a paper proposing a theory of evolution by means of natural selection. Unlike Charles Darwin, who spent twenty years keeping a similar conclusion to himself in private dread, Wallace didn't give a damn what people thought. This utter independence from public opinion is one of several reasons that he has all but vanished from popular consciousness.

    Another is simple bad luck. Wallace grew up poor and was always an outsider in the gentlemen's club that constituted the scientific world of his day. When, in his youth, he sailed to the Amazon to seek his scientific fortune, his ship caught fire and sank on the way home, taking with it thousands of specimens, a number of live monkeys, and his dream of an easy life. Wallace never found steady work and was instead forced to make a living by his pen—risky for a scientist with a restless imagination in a cautious age—supplementing his income by working as a lowly test examiner. Most unluckily of all, Wallace, having completed his explosive paper on evolution, chose to send it to Darwin himself, who then kicked into high gear and brought out "On the Origin of Species" the following year.

    Still another reason for Wallace's obscurity has something to do with that phrenologist. Wallace cracked one of the greatest scientific mysteries of all time but continued to believe throughout his long life that a stranger had read the riddle of his character by feeling the bumps on his head. Phrenology was one of several commitments—like his campaign against vaccination and his credulous defense of spiritualist mediums—that did not endear him to the scientific establishment, or to posterity.

    But there are signs that Wallace's time has finally come. Since 2000, at least five biographies have been published: "The Forgotten Naturalist," by John Wilson; "Alfred Russel Wallace: A Life," by Peter Raby; "In Darwin's Shadow," by Michael Shermer; "The Heretic in Darwin's Court," by Ross A. Slotten; and "An Elusive Victorian," by Martin Fichman. In addition, two recent anthologies of Wallace's own writing—"Infinite Tropics: An Alfred Russel Wallace Anthology," edited by Andrew Berry and introduced by Stephen Jay Gould; and "The Alfred Russel Wallace Reader," edited by Jane R. Camerini and introduced by David Quammen—give a sample of his consummate writing style. Joseph Conrad kept Wallace's classic "The Malay Archipelago" on his night table, drawing on it in several of his own books, most notably "Lord Jim."

    G. K. Chesterton once remarked that Wallace was one of the world's great men because he led a revolution and then a counter-revolution. Having done as much as anyone to overturn traditional religious assumptions, Wallace proceeded to horrify his fellow-evolutionists by concluding that natural selection could not in itself explain the uniqueness of man. He never renounced his evolutionary theory, but instead made it the cornerstone of a theistic explanation of the universe. No wonder a later scientific generation, newly professionalized, ignored him in favor of his more austere and single-minded colleagues. But the twin impulses in Wallace's work make him compelling and oddly contemporary. He combines both halves of the debate over the meaning of evolution, coolly articulating the materialist mechanisms by which the simplest organisms morphed into human beings while arguing that our existence offers evidence of divine agency. If his name is relatively unknown, his spirit is still making itself felt nearly a hundred and fifty years after his seminal discovery.


    Alfred Russel Wallace was born in Usk, Wales, in 1823, to a once prosperous family that had fallen on hard times. His father was a lawyer who never practiced, and who dabbled in doomed literary ventures and made a series of increasingly disastrous investments. Rural Wales remained an important touchstone for Wallace, who encountered there both natural beauty and the poverty of struggling farmers. His education was spotty, but his father read Shakespeare aloud, along with the Bible, Defoe's "A Journal of the Plague Year," and the travel writings of Mungo Park; by his early teens, Wallace had himself read "Paradise Lost," Dante's "Inferno," and, perhaps prophetically, "Don Quixote."

    This reading was his primary patrimony. By the time Wallace was thirteen, the family fortunes had sunk so low that his parents could no longer afford to educate him. He was sent to London to board with a brother who was an apprentice carpenter. At the London Mechanics' Institute, one of several centers of higher learning for the working class, he heard lectures on Robert Owen, the Welsh social reformer, which turned him against the British class system, just as the pamphlets of Thomas Paine, and his brother's radical views, began turning him against the Church. He was soon packed off again, this time to live with another brother in the countryside north of London, working as an apprentice surveyor, but he took his radical notions with him.

    Surveying allowed Wallace to spend his days outdoors, and a new phase of his life began. He discovered geology and botany, purchasing, in 1841, a pamphlet on the structure of plants published by the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. Soon, his interest spread to beetles. There are three hundred and fifty thousand described species of coleoptera in the world, more than any other order in the animal kingdom; when a later British biologist, J. B. S. Haldane, was pressed by a clergyman on the nature of God, he reportedly said, "He has an inordinate fondness for beetles." British naturalists were certainly fond of them, since they could be found all over England. In a public library, Wallace met a young man named Henry Walter Bates, later to become one of the great Victorian entomologists, who was as passionate about natural history as he was. Before long, the young men were planning a tropical adventure in the manner of Alexander von Humboldt and Darwin, whose "Voyage of the Beagle" had been published in 1839, and had fired a generation of restless young naturalists.

    Wallace gave himself a crash course in flora and fauna, making local collecting trips and haunting the British Museum. He also read everything on natural history that he could find, including Robert Chambers's hugely influential book "Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation." This notorious work, published anonymously in 1844, blended science and creationism and argued passionately for "transmutation"—the notion that present life had evolved from previous forms. This was not a new argument—Darwin's grandfather Erasmus had suggested as much two generations earlier; the missing key, which both Darwin and Wallace would supply, was the way that evolution worked. But "Vestiges" helped lay the foundation both for popular acceptance of the concept of evolution and for its ultimate scientific articulation. Though rife with unsubstantiated speculation that put off many established men of science (including Darwin, who also took note of how much calumny could be heaped on a man who ventured unpopular, and unproven, scientific opinions), the book excited Wallace and gave his first trip to the Tropics a purpose beyond the chance to flee a dead-end job and follow in the glamorous footsteps of other scientist-adventurers. Although to the outside world Wallace would remain, for some time, a bug collector for hire, without proper affiliations, his theoretical ambitions were present from the outset. He wrote to Bates, "I should like to take some one family to study thoroughly, principally with a view to the theory of the origin of species."

    For Darwin, and for other famous naturalists of the day, like Thomas Huxley and Joseph Hooker, the road to the Tropics generally ran through the finest universities and a post on one of Her Majesty's ships. For Bates and Wallace, who sailed for the Amazon in 1848, the jungle was their Oxford and Cambridge, as well as a source of income. Burgeoning interest in natural history was creating a lively market in reports and samples from the field. Wallace and Bates signed on with an agent, Samuel Stevens, who taught them taxidermy and species preservation, planned their itinerary to accord with the needs of collectors, sent them bottles and cash when they ran out, and advertised their findings in specialized journals, selling their specimens to institutions like the British Museum and Kew Gardens, as well as to wealthy amateurs.

    The Amazon was a great apprenticeship for Wallace. He absorbed everything—the fact that certain species that could fly would nonetheless remain on their respective riverbanks, the distribution of plant species separated by hundreds or even thousands of miles. He observed the customs of indigenous inhabitants: how totally naked women could still exhibit modesty; how Indians hunted birds (with curare-tipped darts fired from ten-foot-long blowpipes, a technique that he tried but failed to master). He learned the proper way to eat a live ant, the best defense against vampire bats, and the importance of travelling with fishhooks and mirrors and axes for trade. He developed an intimate acquaintance with malaria, dysentery, torrential rains, and, above all, with the staggering diversity of the rain forest.

    But the final lesson came on the way home. Wallace's ship caught fire and sank, and he found himself, after four years in the Amazon, floating in an open boat in the Sargasso Sea, seven hundred miles from shore. He was without friends, having quarrelled with Bates halfway through the expedition. The boat that rescued Wallace almost sank, too, and at some point on the return trip, weak from multiple bouts of fever and contemplating his losses—he had grabbed only a few notebooks, while his entire private collection, including several hundred species new to science, had gone down with the ship—Wallace decided never to travel again.

    His resolution was short-lived. After less than two years in England, he was ready to depart again. He was better known this time, and had proved himself both as a collector and as a surveyor. (His map of the Uaupés River remained in use for more than fifty years.) This earned him the backing of the Royal Geographical Society for a trip to the Malay Archipelago, the vast chain of islands that make up present-day Indonesia.

    He arrived in Singapore in 1854; he was thirty-one years old and was to remain in the Far East for another eight years, amassing, according to Shermer's biography, an "almost unimaginable 125,660 specimens, including 310 mammals, 100 reptiles, 8,050 birds, 7,500 shells, 13,100 butterflies, 83,200 beetles, and 13,400 other insects, over a thousand of which were new species." The book that Wallace later wrote about this period, "The Malay Archipelago," is rich with the thrill and wonder of the hunt, as when he caught his first specimen of the butterfly Ornithoptera poseidon:

    I trembled with excitement as I saw it coming majestically toward me, and could hardly believe I had really succeeded in my stroke till I had taken it out of the net and was gazing, lost in admiration, at the velvet black and brilliant green of its wings, seven inches across, its golden body, and crimson breast. It is true I had seen similar insects in cabinets, at home, but it is quite another thing to capture such one's self—to feel it struggling between one's fingers, and to gaze upon its fresh and living beauty.

    But Wallace, unsurpassed as a collector, was also becoming a great conceptualizer. Only a year into his trip, while living under the protection of the "white Rajah of Sarawak"—an eccentric Englishman who ruled a little fiefdom on the northern coast of Borneo and who, Slotten claims, furnished the model for Rudyard Kipling's "The Man Who Would Be King"—Wallace formulated what became known as "the Sarawak Law." His idea, which he published in 1855, approached a full-blown theory of evolution, concluding that "every species has come into existence coincident both in space and time with a preexisting closely-allied species." Wallace still didn't know how it happened, but he was getting close. The article didn't generate the stir that he had anticipated, but it caught the attention of Charles Lyell, the great geologist whose work was indispensable to both Darwin and Wallace. Lyell was a friend of Darwin's, and after reading Wallace's paper he not only began keeping his own species notebook but urged Darwin to publish something. He recognized that Wallace was closing in.

    In early 1858, Wallace, while based on the island of Ternate, where he had gone in search of the elusive birds of paradise, was gripped by a fit of malarial fever. As he recalled in his autobiography, "At the time in question I was suffering from a sharp attack of intermittent fever, and every day during the cold and succeeding hot fits had to lie down for several hours, during which time I had nothing to do but to think over any subjects then particularly interesting me." In Wallace's case, this meant the origin of species.

    Wallace recalled waiting for the chills and the fever to subside, his mind throbbing with all the reading he had done, including Malthus's "Essay on the Principle of Population," that dark assessment of the way in which disease and famine keep human populations in check, and Lyell's "Principles of Geology," which emphasized the vast age of the earth and the possibility of tiny incremental changes becoming amplified over aeons.

    Swirling around with these theories was Wallace's own experience as a collector, which had given him ample opportunity to note that within each species there were often minute variations, which—in the spans of time that Lyell wrote about, and exposed to the struggles that Malthus described—might become new species if circumstances were favorable. When the fever and shaking subsided, Wallace had it. The fittest variations would survive, the least fit would perish, and new species would thus come into being. During the next two days, he wrote "On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type." He then mailed the paper off to the man most likely to appreciate it.


    Darwin had not been especially impressed with Wallace's Sarawak paper; despite Lyell's excitement, Darwin had written "nothing new" in the margin. That was not his reaction when, on June 18, 1858, he received a package from Ternate containing Wallace's new paper. That very day, he wrote to Lyell expressing his shock: "I never saw a more striking coincidence. . . . Even his terms now stand as heads of my chapters." He added despairingly, "So all my originality, whatever it may amount to, will be smashed."

    What followed has been called the "Delicate Arrangement." The term, drawn from a phrase used by Huxley's grandson, provides the title of a 1980 book by Arnold C. Brackman arguing that Darwin received Wallace's paper earlier than he acknowledged, incorporated aspects of it into his own work, and then sent it on to Lyell pretending that it had just arrived. Much poring over postmarks and manuscripts is involved in this argument, but the recent biographies all make it pretty clear that, at its root, this was primarily an instance—perhaps the greatest—of great minds thinking alike. But there's no question that Hooker and Lyell—Darwin's friends, both of whom were powerful and wellborn members of the Royal Society—took action to protect Darwin's "priority." And although Darwin wrote to Lyell that "I would far rather burn my whole book, than that he or any other man should think that I had behaved in a paltry spirit," he turned the matter over to Lyell and Hooker with enough hints to help them resolve things favorably for him. Lyell and Hooker arranged a reading, at a meeting of the Linnean Society, on July 1, 1858, of three items: the first was an unpublished sketch by Darwin written in 1844; the second was a letter he had written to a Harvard biologist in 1857 describing aspects of his theory; the final, making a sort of coda to Darwin, was Wallace's paper.

    Wallace, still in the Tropics, did not even know about the meeting—nobody told him until it was all over. When he found out, he expressed the humble satisfaction of a servant invited to eat at the master's table, writing to his mother, "I sent Mr. Darwin an essay on a subject on which he is now writing a great work. He showed it to Dr. Hooker and Sir C. Lyell, who thought so highly of it that they immediately read it before the Linnean Society. This assures me the acquaintance and assistance of these eminent men on my return home." One wonders what he might have written had he known the reason for such speedy publication. But later, when he had divined more of the circumstances, he retained his generosity, adding only that he wished he had been given a chance to proof his article.

    Solving the origin of species was all well and good, but Wallace still needed to make a living. He spent four more years in the Malay Archipelago, in part because he could not afford to leave and in part because he did not want to. This was the age when naturalists, armed with only pins and jars and magnifying glasses, were on the cutting edge of the scientific world. However much their findings gave rise to materialism in others, there remained an almost mystical aspect to their love of what we would today call biodiversity—the overwhelming plenitude they found in the rain forest and even in their private gardens when they retired to the English countryside. Throughout his life, Wallace would return to collecting like Antaeus touching the earth; days before his death, at the age of ninety, he was still being wheeled through his garden to look at favorite flowers. Wallace was the kind of man who bottle-fed a baby orangutan for three months after he'd rescued it from a swamp, unconcernedly noting its resemblance to a human infant. He never lost his sense that the natural world contained more than the answers derived from it.

    Wallace came home in 1862, escorting two live birds of paradise. (He'd disembarked for two weeks in Malta to collect live cockroaches for them.) Compared with his return from the Amazon, this was a triumphant homecoming. Wallace was now a scientist of stature, and he had earned Darwin's gratitude and respect even before his return. After "On the Origin of Species" came out, Darwin wrote to him, "Most persons would in your position have felt bitter envy and jealousy. How nobly free you seem to be of this common failing of mankind." He added that he had no doubt that Wallace would have written his own definitive book on the subject just as well or better "if you had had my leisure." Wallace made the most of his brief stability, marrying the daughter of a respected botanist, and enjoying his welcome at various scientific societies. But he was never one to settle into an easy pattern. Replicating his early wanderings, he tended to move every few years, constantly seeking new gardens and better views. And, even as he was championing what he self-effacingly took to calling "Mr. Darwin's principle," he was being drawn toward a radically different world.


    Wallace's sister Fanny had become a spiritualist while he was in the Tropics, and, partly through her interest, Wallace began attending séances in 1865. Though he was skeptical, looking behind doors and under tables in advance of the proceedings, he quickly fell under the spell of these events, enthusiastically recording what he saw. Fresh flowers materialized on a table. (Wallace duly noted each species.) A spirit hand reached down to touch the keys of an accordion. The name of a deceased brother turned up on a piece of paper that Wallace had hidden.

    In 1866, Wallace, never one to keep his opinions to himself, produced a pamphlet, "The Scientific Aspect of the Supernatural," which he sent to his eminent colleagues. In 1869, he published a review of a new edition of Lyell's "Principles." In it, Wallace explained the mechanism of evolution and defended the laws of natural selection that accounted for it, but he also expressed the opinion that "there yet seems to be evidence of a Power which has guided the action of those laws in definite directions and for special ends." This was one of the first public expressions of a mystical turn that Wallace called his "little heresy." Darwin, warned in advance, had written anxiously to Wallace, "I hope you have not murdered too completely your own and my child." Wallace never did abandon natural selection, but later generations came to find him an unfit parent. He did not conform to the pattern of the modern scientist, who, on seeing the evolutionary light, was supposed to shed any illusion about the supernatural. Wallace attempted to reconcile the two, and his reputation suffered accordingly.

    It wasn't only spiritualism. In the eighteen-eighties, he campaigned against vaccination, arguing that doctors, as interested parties, should not be the ones to decide the question. On a speaking tour of America, in 1887, alongside talks on "Darwinism," he delivered lectures with such titles as "If a Man Dies, Shall He Live Again?" His answer was an unequivocal yes. When Wallace announced, "We are all of us, in every act and thought, helping to build up a mental and spiritual nature which will be far more complete after the death of the body than it is now," he sounded less like a scientist than like Keats, articulating his belief that the world is a school for the education of souls.

    Yet through all this he continued to make serious contributions to science. In the eighteen-sixties, Wallace and Darwin carried on a heated debate about the role of sexual selection, and Wallace has often since been proved correct. In 1876, he published "The Geographical Distribution of Animals," which became a pioneering text in the important field of biogeography. Yet, the same year, he relocated his family because a dead brother had urged it via automatic writing. No wonder posterity was confused.

    The generous sweep of the recent batch of biographies makes Wallace's detours far more comprehensible. Wallace's interest in unseen forces was long-standing; he had conducted mesmeric experiments on his students in Leicester and on natives in the Amazon. He attended séances in the name of science as he understood it, a discipline that, in his time, was rapidly becoming more specialized and professionalized. The notion that the spirits of the dead might communicate with the living was, for men like Wallace, something worth looking into—as it was for William James, who sometimes turned up at the same séances.

    For nineteenth-century naturalists, the idea of nature still carried divine associations. The minds that conceived of the possibility of evolutionary change were still informed by the religious assumptions that their new science was challenging. This helps account for the fluidity of opinion at the time. Charles Lyell realized that wind and rain might over aeons erode mountains, inspiring Darwin and Wallace to recognize that a single-celled organism might in time become a human being, but whether one saw such transformations as an explanation or as a subtler form of magic remained a matter of opinion; time, more than anything else, is the difference between "On the Origin of Species" and Ovid's "Metamorphoses." Lyell, so important to Wallace and Darwin, could not initially bring himself to accept the evolutionary ideas he had inspired.

    It is possible to conceive of the debate over evolution as a literary one. Does the universe have an author? Is natural history a story with a plot, or just a random accumulation of anecdotes? Do things reverberate with a secondary, higher meaning, or are they merely what they are? Even Darwin could not free himself from the entanglements of metaphor. "Natural selection" implies agency, a "selector" that Darwin did not really believe in, which is why Wallace chided him for using the phrase.

    Darwin, in his autobiography, noted that, as he grew older, he completely lost the ability to read poetry. He wondered if this was a symptom of mental decline, but it seems symbolic of a change in the fabric of his intellectual life and the larger movement of science away from the confusions of a phrase like "natural selection." The age of metaphor—when science, religion, and poetic imagination were braided together—was passing away. Wallace, meanwhile, read poetry more and more, sprinkling poetic epigraphs through his books. In his autobiography, Wallace, thinking of all the ways in which his setbacks, his poverty, and the loss of his early collections had ultimately led him to his present life, quotes Hamlet: "There's a divinity that shapes our ends, rough-hew them how we will."

    In 1889, Wallace read Edward Bellamy's "Looking Backward" and became a socialist. He had long been a vocal critic of England's stratified society; his opposition to compulsory vaccination had grown out of a conviction that the poor could not pay the fines for noncompliance and would wind up in jail, while the rich could shrug them off. ("Liberty," he said, "is in my mind a far greater and more important thing than science.") He became president of the Land Nationalisation Society and wrote that natural selection could never have the beneficial effect on human beings that it might as long as vast social inequalities existed. The "social Darwinism" that was already taking shape was, he felt, just a defense of class privilege.

    His political passions, like aspects of his spiritualism, brought him full circle—back to the natives he had encountered in the Amazon and in the Malay Archipelago. Darwin, as Slotten observes, had been appalled by the gap between the "savages" he came across and Western man, whereas Wallace had often been struck by the similarities, and felt an instinctive kinship. Many of his passions—land nationalization, radical equality, even the belief in a spirit world—were built into the native societies he had encountered on his travels. Wallace was capable of suggesting without irony that the head-hunting Dayaks, among whom he had lived in Borneo, were morally superior to his British compatriots.

    The generations that came after Wallace, extending into our own, have never known quite what to make of him. He remains today too theistic for the Darwinians and too Darwinian for advocates of intelligent design, with whom it is hard to imagine him having much patience. But his holistic impulses can still be seen in the work of naturalists like E. O. Wilson, who incorporated human nature into his theory of sociobiology (to wide scientific outrage) and who continues to dream of what he calls "consilience." Though Wilson is not a theist, forty per cent of American scientists, when polled, acknowledge a belief in some sort of divine power. And there are scientists, like Francis Collins, the head of the Human Genome Project, who have declared unabashedly that the genetic code is the language of God. Collins seems to intend that statement as more than a metaphor but to be disinclined, unlike Wallace, to attempt a scientific argument proving that it is.

    Shermer's book, "In Darwin's Shadow," observes that, when Wallace started out, "the study of nature and theology were two sides of the same coin," and the term "science" had yet to acquire its specialized sense of systematic observation in the natural sciences. Wallace, whose theory played such a crucial part in severing the relationship between science and religion, then devoted himself to the attempt to link them again. In the century since his death, in 1913, the gulf between science and religion has only widened, and later generations of scientists, reaching for useful models, have overlooked him.

    Nonetheless, by the end of his long life Wallace had, almost in spite of himself, become enormously famous. Despite trying to turn down an honorary degree from Oxford, membership in the Royal Society, and the Order of Merit (it required a visit to Buckingham Palace and an expensive new suit of clothes that Wallace did not wish to buy), Wallace wound up with just about every honor a great scientist could receive. At his death, he could have been buried in Westminster Abbey, next to Darwin, but his family, knowing his wishes, declined. Instead, they buried him in the local graveyard, which had a better view.


     
     




    On the Road
    by Lawrence Wright
    Molly Ivins’s acidic Texas humor.
    Issue of 1994-10-31
    Posted 2007-02-05

    One humorist who may find less than usual to laugh about this season is Molly Ivins, the red-headed Texan raconteur. Ivins’s friend Ann Richards is facing a tough race in her bid for a second term as the governor of Texas, and the Democrats could also lose the statehouse. But both Ivins and Richards are veterans of many crusades, and, in any case, Texas liberals are used to being beleaguered. It’s how they got their caustic sense of humor, which has long been their trademark.

    In 1990, Ivins made a rash promise. Her mentor, John Henry Faulk, was on his deathbed. During the fifties, Faulk had been a radio humorist with a national following much like the one that Ivins has gained for herself through her books and newspaper commentary. Their acidic humor is a native Texas brew of implacable populism and sour liberalism. (Ann Richards drinks from the same cup.) In the McCarthy era, Faulk, who could fearlessly compare McCarthy to an “egg sucking dog” but who also believed that “Communists have about the same degree of tolerance and humanity as the Hardshelled Baptists,” was tarred as a Communist himself. He never regained his audience, and spent the rest of his life living in the Texas hill country, championing the right to free speech. When Ivins went to say goodbye to Faulk, she blurted, “John Henry, I don’t want you to worry about the First Amendment. I’m gonna take care of it.”

    For four years now, Ivins, who comes to town this week to speak at the New York Public Library, has been travelling the country in penance for that remark. “I started, as you might think a journalist would, talking a lot about freedom of speech and freedom of the press,” she said recently. “But I find more and more that I spend a fair amount of time explaining to people what the establishment clause means. We are having a whole lot of confusion about the separation of church and state these days, and it helps people to be reminded what the founders actually said. One of the things you often hear if you debate Christian fundamentalists is that nowhere in the Constitution do the words ‘separation of church and state’ appear. Of course, that’s quite true. But the intent of the establishment clause really could not be more clear. James Madison, who has become one of my real heroes, wrote something to the effect that the purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries. And still does! Sarajevo was one of the most sophisticated cities in the world—people of different faiths, who lived and worked and played together for generations—absolutely ripped apart in a matter of months by religious passions. Beirut, once the jewel of the Middle East, the same story.”

    Ivins finds that humor is the best weapon in the war against intolerance. Unfortunately, it is one that the defenders of the First Amendment sometimes have to learn to use on themselves. “I’m a supporter of the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization that has the most dismal sense of public relations in the history of humankind,” Ivins said. “Every Christmas, the A.C.L.U. sues somebody for an excess of Christmas spirit. And every year I say, ‘Couldn’t you people wait till after New Year’s?’ ” One year, she recalled, someone put up a crèche in the Texas state capitol, in Austin. “And, of course, the A.C.L.U. was threatening to sue, so I was calling various state politicians to find out what they thought. And I called Ann, who was then state treasurer, and I said, ‘Annie, what do you think about the crèche—does it have to go?’ And she said, ‘Oh, I hate to see them take that crèche out of the capitol. It could be the only chance we’ll ever have to get three wise men in that building.’ ”


  • Suspension Training

    Thomas McDonald for The New York Times

    A GOOD WORKOUT At gyms across the country suspension training is gaining. Above, a class with TRX straps at Crunch in San Francisco.

    Darcy Padilla for The New York Times

    Kurt Dasbach, the creator of Inkaflexx straps, with Kathy Lee Bickham at Equinox in Darien, Conn.


    February 1, 2007

    Suspension Training: How Risky Is It?

    NAVY Seals are legendary for their tiptop physical condition, but have you ever wondered how they stay fighting fit out in the field?

    Aaron Baldwin, 43, who retired in December as a master chief in the Seals, used to make barbells out of nothing more than plastic milk jugs, fresh concrete and a sturdy tree branch.

    "We'd make one weight and use it until we had to move and start over," Mr. Baldwin said.

    Things changed in 2002, when a Navy Seal turned entrepreneur sent Mr. Baldwin a test model of the TRX system, a suspension gadget made of a pair of straps with handles joined by a metal clasp ring. To set it up, he only had to wrap the straps around a freestanding pole or over a thick branch. Strength training became as simple as placing his feet in stirrups to suspend them off the ground, then performing dozens of exercises like knee tucks or pushups.

    After 45 minutes of so-called suspension training, Mr. Baldwin exhausted his body from shoulders to calves using just the 170 pounds of his weight. Better yet, the two-pound straps rolled up to the size of a military bag lunch.

    In the last year suspension training has entered the mainstream after two kinds of straps landed on the market: TRX and Inkaflexx. They have attracted the attention of personal trainers and group fitness directors as strengthening tools that also improve balance and flexibility. Suspension workouts consist of either hanging the legs or leaning back while gripping the straps and then performing a variety of moves.

    The beauty of suspension training, its advocates say, is that you can't help engaging your core to steady yourself. On the other hand, critics warn that the instability of suspension straps can result in injury, especially if you have a history of joint or back injuries, or inadequate core strength.

    Personal trainers use TRX equipment at over 1,000 gyms nationwide, according to Fitness Anywhere, its maker. Roughly 10,000 $150 sets of straps have been shipped.

    Group classes for suspension devotees have begun to crop up nationwide. At Crunch, a class called BodyWeb With TRX is in full swing at two San Francisco outposts, and so is a pilot class featuring Inkaflexx equipment at Equinox in Darien, Conn. By mid-March, Equinox plans to offer TRX or Inkaflexx classes in Boston, Los Angeles and a new Manhattan club on Park Avenue. This summer, Life Time Fitness will add suspension training classes at a handful of its 60 locations in 16 states.

    "It's like yoga on ropes because it takes a lot of balance," said Mark Undercoffler, 32, a public relations executive in San Francisco, who has attended the Crunch BodyWeb class for three months. "The TRX works every part of your body in 50 minutes, especially your core. It's the quickest way to get a cardio and muscle workout in less than an hour. I sweat as much in BodyWeb as I do in spin class."

    The BodyWeb With TRX class — which involves lunges, chest presses and one-legged squats to high-energy dance music — is so fast paced that some say it amounts to a cardiovascular workout. At Equinox a mellower class called Inka focuses more on flexibility. To Andean flute music, participants are led through a series of stretches and a handful of strength-training moves.

    Suspension training is having a moment partly because some trainers and clients are bored with the ubiquitous balance equipment like stability balls. Interest in suspension straps is also high because a theory called functional training has been making slow but steady inroads in the fitness business. It advocates strengthening muscles synergistically, rather than in isolation.

    "With so much emphasis put on core and functional training, the timing is right" for suspension training, said Kathie Davis, the executive director of IDEA Health and Fitness Association, a trade group. "It has staying power because it has good education and programming behind it. Usually the trends that come and go are the ones that don't have good educators putting together interesting programs to go with the equipment."

    Randy Hetrick, the inventor of TRX straps, and his company, Fitness Anywhere, have developed over 300 exercises and taught 200 personal trainers and instructors in daylong seminars. After taking one, Susane Pata, a group fitness director at Crunch, designed the BodyWeb class.

    Not everyone agrees that suspension training is appropriate for the masses.

    Fabio Comana, a research scientist at the nonprofit American Council on Exercise, said that it might be valuable for well-conditioned athletes and gymgoers who regularly train their core, the muscles closest to their spine. But at best it is inappropriate for people who haven't built up their core and at worst is potentially dangerous for them. "A segment of the population doesn't have joint integrity and the ability to stabilize their entire body," he said. So instead of using their core, they use the wrong muscles, aggravating their risk for injury.

    Mr. Comana, who has a master's degree in exercise physiology, added, "I don't mean to doubt it, because I do like it, and I've been using it for the last year." But he counts himself among the experienced athletes who stand to benefit from the straps.

    Walter Thompson, a professor of kinesiology at Georgia State University in Atlanta, who reviewed instructional videos of TRX exercises, sees benefits but also risk. "My impression is that this would be effective for a small group of highly fit men and women," Dr. Thompson said. "But I see potential for muscular, skeletal and joint injuries. Particularly hyperextension of wrists, elbows, shoulders, ankles and knees."

    Fraser Quelch, the director of education at Fitness Anywhere, disagreed. To avoid injury, he suggested that deconditioned users perform moves with one leg behind the other, reducing instability.

    Advocates of suspension training also say that adjusting body position can make movements easier. For example, standing at 90 degrees and holding TRX straps keeps upper-body exercises manageable.

    Mr. Baldwin, who spent five years in the service teaching recruits conditioning and combat skills, said, "It's easy to do a pushup with your hands against a wall, and it's a lot harder to do one on the ground." Suspension training, he added, "allows you to do exercises at every angle between the two."

    Kurt Dasbach, the creator of Inkaflexx, argues that its trapezelike design — straps hanging from a wall joined by a bar — makes it inherently a bit more stable. "Inkaflexx is secured to the wall or ceiling by two anchors, so you're not countering instability in every direction," said Mr. Dasbach, a personal trainer at Equinox. "As a result, it makes a lot of the movements accessible for many people because it offers more stability than the TRX."

    In a decade of working with Michael Carson, a personal trainer at Pro Gym in Brentwood, Calif., Jennifer Roth has tried dozens of new new things like stability balls and resistance cords. But Ms. Roth, 42, a carpet designer, said she likes the suspension strap best. "There's always something new and more advanced you can bring to it, whether that is trying a new move or simply making it more difficult by changing your body angle," said Ms. Roth, a college gymnast and swimmer. She has used TRX twice a week since July and credits it for leaner muscles and increased strength in her obliques.

    The two systems on the market differ in design, not least because they are products of starkly different hothouses. Mr. Hetrick was a Navy Seal squadron commander in the late 1990s, when he created the first prototype of TRX out of parachute webbing and a carabiner ring.

    "We were deploying throughout Bosnia and Southeast Asia in submarines, ships, warehouses and safe houses, all of these space-constrained environments where it's hard to do well-rounded training," he said.

    In 2005, four years after he left the service, Mr. Hetrick began marketing his product to the fitness business. Coincidentally, Mr. Dasbach created a similar apparatus inspired by his years as a professional soccer player in Chile, where a coach tied ropes to a wall to help players stretch.

    Marke Rubenstein, 53, an advertising executive in Stamford, Conn., was intimidated when she first saw the Inkaflexx straps. "I'm not very athletic and I'm not great in various difficult yoga poses, but I feel very comfortable with this," she said after six visits to Mr. Dasbach's class. "It's challenging but not too difficult, and I can always modify the straps to make them work for me."


     
    Citizen Anna Wintour

    Hope Gangloff

    Diane Bondareff/Associated Press

    POWER CENTER Anna Wintour watching the proceedings of Fashion Week in New York.

    Citizen Anna

    New Blog: On the Runway

    Cathy Horyn on all things fashion.

    IF there is one thing that no one doubts about Anna Wintour, the editor of Vogue, it is her power. To many she is the dominant figure in the fashion world, her influence greater than any contemporary editor and running close to a press baron, because she has sought through her magazine and its spinoffs to set the agenda for an industry and through her civic causes, like the Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, to influence the cultural life of New York.

    And to millions of people to whom her power is less real (who know her only in connection with "The Devil Wears Prada") she is also a symbol: the small cross-armed woman in the front row, inscrutable behind her dark glasses and self-protecting English bob, her effect equal parts terrifying and calm, like the center of the storm she has dominated for 19 years.

    For as much as Ms. Wintour, 57, is scrutinized, her deal-making within the fashion industry is one activity that has received scant attention. In recent years she has gone beyond the editorial domain and involved herself in the placement of designers at fashion houses. Her efforts fall across a spectrum of involvement, from outright pitching the name of a person she likes to a chief executive, to putting her weight behind a pending decision, to effectively make a marriage.

    She instigated the deal last year between the men's designer Thom Browne and Brooks Brothers, cultivating in a virtually unknown talent the idea of a larger audience and then urging the company's chief executive, Claudio Del Vecchio, to give him a chance. "She put a lot of pressure on me," Mr. Del Vecchio said. "She'd say, 'I think there's something here. Please keep talking.' "

    This fall, Mr. Browne's designs will be in 90 Brooks Brothers stores — and, presumably, of course, in Vogue.

    Ms. Wintour has also been busy trying to find a new employer for Phoebe Philo, the English star who left Chloé in 2005. Last May, Ms. Wintour invited Ms. Philo to a lunch in New York with François-Henri Pinault, the chief executive of PPR, the French luxury-goods group that owns brands like Gucci, Yves Saint Laurent and Balenciaga.

    "It was quite simple," Mr. Pinault said of the lunch. "She thought it would be interesting for me to meet Phoebe." He made it clear that PPR had no vacancies and no plans to start new labels. Nonetheless, Ms. Wintour pressed Ms. Philo's case in a later conversation, and Mr. Pinault said he expects her to do the same this week, when they meet in New York, to discuss the spring Costume Institute gala, of which Balenciaga is a sponsor.

    "She's not too pushy," Mr. Pinault said. "From my point of view, it's a very positive way of demonstrating her power. She lets you know it's not a problem if you can't do something she wants. But she makes you understand that if you could, she would be very supportive with her magazine. She really makes you understand that."

    Since the days of Diana Vreeland and John Fairchild, the former publisher of Women's Wear Daily, fashion editors have been regarded not only as journalists but as boosters for the industry. Without actually knowing whether an editor was advising a designer or telling the buyer at Macy's to order more blue shirts, readers assumed they were.

    Then, in the buying frenzy of the 1990s, when nearly every big Paris house changed hands, editors like Ms. Wintour and Patrick McCarthy, Mr. Fairchild's successor, found themselves with even more influence over the industry. The new corporate owners, like Bernard Arnault, the chairman of LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, had come from the worlds of real estate, finance and timber. Important editors found themselves consulting about everything from the meaning of grunge to the importance of individual designers. "I think Arnault asked a lot of people about Marc," Mr. McCarthy said, referring to the designer Marc Jacobs, now at Louis Vuitton. "I don't think he knew his reputation."

    MS. Wintour, though, has used her influence more purposefully than anyone else: as a dealmaker. She seemed, in fact, to grasp that the arrival of the luxury moguls was an opportunity to scrape years of French dust off fashion, and make them pay for exciting new talent.

    In the mid '90s, she got an executive at Paine Webber to help John Galliano, propelling him permanently onto the Paris stage. She helped Mr. Jacobs early in his career, getting Donald Trump to lend him a ballroom at the Plaza Hotel when Mr. Jacobs and his partner, Robert Duffy, had no money for a show. During the Vuitton negotiations she continually pressed Mr. Jacobs's case with Mr. Arnault. "She would say, 'What do you need me to do.' " Mr. Duffy said. "I would say, 'When your have lunch with Mr. Arnault, will you put in a good word.' I don't know what Anna said or did not say."

    Ms. Wintour, who declined to be interviewed for this article, is a woman of seemingly limitless energy and a famously short attention span, who prefers to have her threats delivered by a lieutenant. ("Do you want me to go to Anna with this?" is a typical line, according to fashion publicists.)

    In more recent years she has made young designers her mission. This could be her legacy as an editor, though it may be a mixed one. She helped lay the groundwork for the CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund, which, after years of industry lip service, provides the first practical support for young talent. But many fashion insiders and critics feel that by promoting labels of dubious design merit but with an obvious social or power connection, like Georgina Chapman of Marchesa, whose companion is the producer Harvey Weinstein, she leaves herself open to the complaint that her magazine promotes a kind of a pedantry.

    This becomes a danger when she attempts to make a match. The chief executive of a top European house, who recently had a spot to fill, said he was surprised by the names she proposed, characterizing one as a socialite. "The woman had designed maybe 10 dresses in her life," said the executive, who, like a number of the nearly two dozen people interviewed for this article, requested anonymity because of his relationship with Ms. Wintour.

    How much one objects to this kind of influence depends on how much one is able to grasp the totality of Ms. Wintour's activities. Her efforts are widely seen as being for the general good of the industry. People who know her well say her motives are selfless and that her power is really concentrated on her magazines.

    "Anna is not Machiavellian," said Michael Roberts, the fashion director of Vanity Fair. Mr. Lagerfeld agreed: "She's honest. She tells you what she thinks. Yes is yes and no is no."

    In spite of the bitterness she felt at seeing her friend Tom Ford leave Gucci, and in spite of telling Mr. Pinault that he was making a terrible mistake to let him go, Mr. Pinault said she remained supportive of Gucci.

    But you don't have to doubt Ms. Wintour's integrity to see the danger of too much influence. You just have to look at the magazine and its three spinoffs (Teen Vogue, Men's Vogue, Vogue Living), at the tendency to feature the same socialites and pretty dresses, in the same perfect settings, and then imagine what the implications would be if she could also determine where designers worked.

    Candy Pratts Price, the executive fashion director of Style.com, the Web site for Vogue and W, said Vogue's editors now attempt to "place" clothes on socialites and other prominent women year-round, not just for the Costume Institute gala. That is, they arrange favored designers to lend dresses for public appearances. The pictures will run in Vogue, as well as in other magazines, reinforcing the importance of those designers. Julie Gilhart, the fashion director of Barneys, says she thinks women are more influenced today by party pictures than by editorial spreads of models. "It's the People magazine-US Weekly syndrome," she said.

    "Everyone wants to see what people are wearing." Ms. Price said, "You can look at it as a good thing or a bad thing, but Anna has her finger in it." From the magazine's perspective, she said, a virtue of placement is that you can control how the clothes will be exposed. "The end result is that Anna can control it all the way to the selling floor," Ms. Price said.

    In its use of franchising and product placement and its glamorous, if predictable, formula, Vogue resembles the Hollywood blockbuster. "Nobody else is doing that, and I don't think anyone has done that in the history of fashion magazines," Mr. McCarthy said of the clothes placement. He added, "I don't think Vreeland had that kind of concentration. She wouldn't have dressed Babe Paley. Nor would Babe Paley have let her."

    The truth is, for good or bad, Ms. Wintour has identified the prime cultural coordinates — the compliant, publicity-seeking socialite, the obsession with money, the struggling young designer, the deterioration of old aesthetics and the rise of the luxury-goods tycoon — and aimed Vogue straight at them. "I believe that Anna opened her arms to the big global picture before anyone else did," said Stan Herman, the former president of the Council of Fashion Designers of America.

    At the same time, she has the readiness of an old-fashioned ward boss. She puts people in her due by making herself and the services of her magazine available to them.

    Yet, according to any number of chief executives and designers, she does not extract advertising for editorial favors and, unlike a number of her counterparts in Europe, she does not run a side business as a consultant to fashion houses. Long before "The Devil Wears Prada," her office (which has three executive assistants) was famous for its exotic efficiency. It comes as a surprise to people to have their phone calls returned immediately, to receive dossiers on the latest actresses (as she did for the designer Stefano Pilati) or to hear a rather shy but crisp English voice say, hurriedly, "What can I do to help?"

    IF it sometimes seems that the runways in New York — and, by extension, the fashion pages of American Vogue — reflect a homogeneous, vaguely timid point of view, it's understandable.

    "No one says no to her," Mr. Roberts said. "And, in a weird way, it's not her fault."

    Lacking mortal patience, Ms. Wintour is unlikely to help people who feel intimated by her, but at least by her efforts she can show them worlds that might have been unavailable to them, and maybe, in the process, allow them to see her as Shelley plain. "I don't understand what people are scared of," Ms. Price said. "That they're going to have a lesser relationship with Anna? I think they want to be closer, but they don't know how."

    Many talented American designers, notably Isabel Toledo and Alice Roi, have tended to keep themselves apart from Vogue, with no loss to their reputations, while others, like Derek Lam, imagined they needed some kind of school pass. "I was waiting for the call to be summoned to her office," Mr. Lam said with a laugh. "I thought it was so pretentious to call Anna."

    Next week, Ms. Toledo will present her first collection for Anne Klein during Fashion Week, and Mr. Lam, in addition to having his own label, is now creative director of Tod's, the Italian leather-goods house. Ms. Price believes that exposure from the Fashion Fund brought them these opportunities.

    And Ms. Wintour thinks that Tod's is right for Mr. Lam, too. But initially she wasn't sure he was ready for the position. "I got the blank look," said Ms. Price when she told Ms. Wintour that Diego Della Valle, the owner of Tod's, wanted to work with Mr. Lam. "I think Anna believed that Derek hadn't yet achieved a signature look in his own line."

    Indeed, as Mr. Lam acknowledged, this was her criticism during a Fashion Fund interview. "She said: 'I don't know what Derek Lam is about. Tell me what your focus is,' " he recalled. "Her advice was very concrete."

    It turns out that Ms. Wintour can say no. Maybe because corporate executives tend to know that the real power in fashion rests with the people who control the money, they don't see a downside to her influence. "I don't feel I owe her anything, or that she owes me anything," Mr. Del Vecchio of Brooks Brothers said, adding: "It's the passion that motivates her.


     
    The Shelf Life of Socialites

    Todd Williamson/FilmMagic.com

    SEE AND BE SEEN Sitting pretty and seated prominently at a fashion show last week are, from left, Annelise Peterson, Byrdie Bell and Olivia Palermo.

    Fashion Shows

    New York Fashion Week
    New York Fashion Week

    Reviews and commentary, as well as photographs, audio and video from Fashion Week.

    Go to Complete Coverage »

    Blog

    On the Runway

    On the RunwayCathy Horyn goes backstage at shows and inside the minds of designers.

    Go to Blog »
    February 7, 2007

    The Shelf Life of Socialites: For Some, Shorter Than a Mini

    Shockingly, there was a fashion show this week to which Tinsley Mortimer was not invited. To be honest, there were a few.

    "She's past the point!" declared Kristian Laliberte, a fashion publicist and self-appointed arbiter of New York socialites, as he finalized the guest list for the show of Yigal Azrouël, a designer attempting to woo the socialite in-crowd. "She's becoming Paris Hilton!"

    Oh, dear. Not invited.

    In previous Fashion Weeks, Ms. Mortimer, she of the dangling Goldilocks ringlets, was the cat's meow of the latest generation of young women to become celebrities of New York society. But the makeup of the front rows seems to be changing with the seasons, with a turnover so fast as to suggest that modern It Girls, following the classic model of Edie Sedgwick, are suddenly as replaceable as factory parts.

    As Ms. Mortimer must know by her press clippings or from the snide remarks about her on Web sites dedicated to her lot, the job of socialite today requires a thick skin and a careful attention to the risks of overexposure. Over the weekend, as was gleefully noted on one blog, a photographer misidentified Ms. Mortimer as Tatum O'Neal. Ouch. The cats in the second row have their claws out.

    "I try not to read that," Ms. Mortimer said on her way into the Oscar de la Renta show, where the ring of photographers around her suggested that her stock has hardly fallen to junk status. "Sometimes they can be a little hurtful. People who write about us try to make it seem like we're all fighting, like it's high school, but it's not that way."

    Nevertheless, as the traditional barriers to becoming a socialite — a pedigree, say — disappear, anyone who can wear a designer dress well enough to attract the attention of Patrick McMullan can become one. This happened to Olivia Palermo, 20, who is a junior at the New School. Through family friends, she was invited last April to a Sotheby's auction, where Mr. McMullan, the ubiquitous party photographer, took her snapshot, which he posted online; she was then invited to more parties, had more pictures taken, and last month she was hired to appear in advertisements for a dress collection called Hollywould. So Ms. Palermo had been invited to make the Fashion Week rounds: Anait Bian, Linda Loudermilk, Ruffian, Jackie Rogers and more.

    Despite Ms. Palermo's ubiquity this season, Michael Kors, an expert on socialites, said he had not heard of her. Not invited.

    "It's the same as an actor," Mr. Kors said. "You don't want to come out with six movies in a year. You pick and choose what's important."

    And now that many socialites have products to promote, or appear to be promoting themselves, something of a backlash has arisen. Socialites of the classic mold play a more important role when acting as clients of designers — meaning paying for their clothes — rather than as commercials. They are objective.

    "They are the best barometer of whether or not something is really fabulous," said Mr. Kors, who is expecting a mix at his show today that includes Ms. Mortimer, Jamee Gregory and Cece Cord. "Quite honestly, they've worn a lot of things. It's fun to get the feedback from those women. Now you have everything from a socialite-slash-doctor to a socialite-slash-business person."

    Anyway, it is becoming difficult to determine just which ones belong to which designer, who's in, who's out, who cares. On Monday, the Daily, which is kind of a yearbook of Fashion Week, offered a field guide for recognizing the next wave, which includes the children of magazine editors and fashion executives, as well as a daughter of the French prime minister — a lot of women with long wavy hair to keep straight.

    "In the relevancy of everything, socialites are the lowest in priority," said the designer Phillip Lim, who invited only one to his show on Sunday night, Amanda Brooks, whom he likened to the other socialite Edie, the one from "Grey Gardens." (She has "pedigree without prudence," he said.) "They go against what I do as a designer," he said. "In an ideal world, I'd say, 'Can't we all just get along?' But we can't."

    At Mr. Azrouël's show on Friday, there in one row was Fabiola Beracasa, a jewelry executive-slash-socialite; Derek Blasberg, a freelance writer-slash-socialite; Annelise Peterson, a publicist-slash-socialite; Byrdie Bell, an actress-slash-socialite; Ms. Palermo, the college student-slash-socialite; and Luigi Tadini, also a jewelry executive-slash-socialite whose trademark is an artfully wrapped scarf. One moved seats to be closer to the cameras. Another was displeased. "She's dead to me," that one said.

    "Suddenly, there is a boom of interest in what is this creature, the social girl," Ms. Beracasa said later that afternoon at the BCBG show, where she was joined by Ms. Bell, Ms. Palermo and Bettina Zilkha, an author-slash-socialite.

    Ms. Beracasa is writing a blog about going to the shows for New York magazine, which partly explains her omnipresence, although she did not mind announcing that she had not been invited to the Marc Jacobs show and would have liked to have been. The new socialites, unlike the old socialites, are more like dress deposit boxes in the bank of designer publicity; Mr. Jacobs doesn't need it.

    By the time Ms. Beracasa arrived at Diane Von Furstenberg's show on Sunday, she had been to several more shows, Bungalow 8 and elsewhere. She was wearing a black leather wrap dress by the designer and big heavy sunglasses to hide her eyes. "I wish they were bigger," she said. Wasn't Ms. Beracasa worried that someone might disparage her?

    "It comes with the territory," she said. "A lot of people are misrepresented all over the world. There's a way to avoid that. Don't go out."


     
    Federal Holidays 2007

    Monday, January 1

    New Year's Day

    Monday, January 15

    Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Monday, February 19*

    Washington's Birthday

    Monday, May 28

    Memorial Day

    Wednesday, July 4

    Independence Day

    Monday, September 3

    Labor Day

    Monday, October 8

    Columbus Day

    Monday, November 12**

    Veterans Day

    Thursday, November 22

    Thanksgiving Day

    Tuesday, December 25

    Christmas Day

     
     



    COMMENT
    LOST LOVE
    by Hendrik Hertzberg
    Issue of 2006-09-11
    Posted 2006-09-04

    After the calamity that glided down upon us out of a clear blue sky on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001—five short years ago, five long years ago—a single source of solace emerged amid the dread and grief: a great upwelling of simple solidarity. Here in New York, and in similarly bereaved Washington, that solidarity took homely forms. Strangers connected as friends; volunteers appeared from everywhere; political and civic leaders of all parties and persuasions stood together, united in sorrow and defiance. In certain regions of the country, New York had been regarded (and resented) as somehow not quite part of America; that conceit, not shared by the terrorists, vanished in the fire and dust of the Twin Towers. The reconciliation was mutual. In SoHo and the Upper West Side, in the Village and the Bronx, sidewalk crowds cheered every flag-bedecked fire engine, and the Stars and Stripes sprouted from apartment windows all over town. New York, always suspect as the nation’s polyglot-plutocratic portal, was now its battered, bloody shield.

    The wider counterpart to our traumatized togetherness at home was an astonishing burst abroad of what can only be called pro-Americanism. Messages of solidarity and indignation came from Libya and Syria as well as from Germany and Israel; flowers and funeral wreaths piled up in front of American Embassies from London to Beijing; flags flew at half-staff across Europe; in Iran, a candlelight vigil expressed sympathy. “Any remnants of neutrality thinking, of our traditional balancing act, have gone out of the window now,” a Swedish political scientist told Reuters. “There has not been the faintest shadow of doubt, not a trace of hesitation of where we stand, nowhere in Sweden.” Le Mondes front-page editorial was headlined NOUS SOMMES TOUS AMÉRICAINS, and Italy’s Corriere della Sera echoed, “We are all Americans. The distance from the United States no longer exists because we, our values, are also in the crosshairs of evil minds.” In Brussels, the ambassadors of the nineteen members of NATO invoked, for the first time in the alliance’s fifty-two-year history, Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, affirming that “an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all” and pledging action, “including the use of armed force.”

    No one realistically expected that the mood of fellow-feeling and coöperation would long persist in the extraordinarily powerful form it took in the immediate wake of September 11th. The normal divisions of American politics and society were bound to make themselves felt again, and whatever the United States did in response to the attacks would provoke the tensions and misunderstandings that inevitably accompany the actions of a superpower in distress, no matter how deft its diplomacy or thorough its consultations. But it was natural to hope that domestic divisions would prove less rancorous in the face of the common danger, and that international frictions could be minimized in a struggle against what almost every responsible leader in the world recognized, or claimed to recognize, as an assault on civilization itself.

    What few expected was how comprehensively that initial spirit would be ruined by the policies and the behavior of our government, culminating in, though hardly limited to, the disastrous occupation of Iraq. This shouldn’t have been so surprising. George W. Bush campaigned in 2000 as a “compassionate conservative,” one who recognized that government was not the enemy, praised bipartisanship, proclaimed his intention to “change the tone in Washington,” and advocated a foreign policy of humility and respect. None of that happened. Nine months into his Presidency, an economic policy of transferring the budget surplus to the wealthy, a social policy hewing to the demands of the Christianist far right, and a foreign policy marked by contempt for international instruments (the Kyoto protocol, the anti-ballistic-missile treaty) and the abandonment of diplomatic responsibilities (the negotiations over North Korea’s nuclear activities, the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate) had pushed Bush’s job ratings lower than those of any of his predecessors at a like point in their tenures. September 11th offered him a chance for a new beginning, and at first he seemed willing to seize it. Although the war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan was not as widely backed at first as is often assumed (particularly among many on the European left and some on the American), it is now almost universally supported in the Western world, with some forty countries involved and NATO troops carrying an increasing share of the military burden. But then came a reversion to form, and Iraq.

    In “America Against the World: How We Are Different and Why We Are Disliked,” based on ninety-one thousand interviews conducted in fifty nations from 2002 to 2005 by the Pew Research Center, Andrew Kohut and Bruce Stokes write that while “the first hints that the world was becoming troubled by America came soon after the election of George W. Bush,” and that “whatever global goodwill the United States had in the wake of the September 11 attacks appears to have quickly dissipated,” after the Iraq invasion “favorable opinions had more than slipped. They had plummeted.” It’s grown worse since May, when the book was published. The most recent Pew findings show that “favorable opinions of the U.S.” have gone from eighty-three per cent in 2000 to fifty-six per cent in 2006 in Britain, seventy-eight to thirty-seven in Germany, and sixty-two to thirty-nine in France. The majorities saying that the Iraq war has made the world more dangerous are equally impressive: sixty per cent in Britain, sixty-six in Germany, and seventy-six in France. On this point, the United States is catching up. The most recent CNN poll, taken in late August, found fifty-five per cent of Americans saying that the Iraq war has made them less safe from terrorism.

    Last week, the Administration launched a new public-relations campaign aimed at marketing the war in Iraq as the indispensable key to the struggle against terrorism. The Vice-President and the Secretary of Defense gave speeches attacking the war’s opponents (a category that includes, if that same CNN poll is to be believed, sixty-one per cent of the American public) as the contemporary counterparts of the appeasers of Nazism. President Bush, as one of his contributions to the P.R. campaign, granted an interview to Brian Williams, of NBC. As the two men, shirtsleeved in the sun, strolled together down a bleak New Orleans street, Williams wondered if the President shouldn’t “have asked for some sort of sacrifice after 9/11.” Bush’s reply:

    Americans are sacrificing. I mean, we are. You know, we pay a lot of taxes. America sacrificed when they, you know, when the economy went into the tank. Americans sacrificed when, you know, air travel was disrupted. American taxpayers have paid a lot to help this nation recover. I think Americans have sacrificed.

    And so we have. Not by paying “a lot of taxes,” of course; we pay less of those than we did before, and the very, very richest among us pay much, much less. But we have sacrificed, God knows. “The military occupation in Iraq is consuming practically the entire defense budget and stretching the Army to its operational limits,” John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration and a member of the 9/11 Commission, wrote in the Washington Post a couple of days after Bush’s interview. “This is understood quite clearly by both our friends and our enemies, and as a result, our ability to deter enemies around the world is disintegrating.” That’s a sacrifice. And here’s another: our country’s reputation.

  • They were police detectives, shot at close range

    Chuck Robinson/Associated Press

    The execution chamber at the United States Penitentiary in Terra Haute, Ind., where there people, including Timothy J. McVeigh, convicted of the Oklahoma City bombing, have died of lethal injection since 2001.

    February 1, 2007

    Geography and Emotion Helped Sway Jurors' Vote

    They were police detectives, shot at close range, in the backs of their heads. Fellow officers and relatives filled the courtroom, day after day, during the trial of the man accused of pulling the trigger, who mostly kept his emotions to himself.

    Add to that where the jurors came from — Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island and Long Island, but not Manhattan. And that the detectives knew, and were known in, the neighborhood, which gave the case a strong local connection — unlike, say, a case involving terrorist acts overseas.

    Taken together, all those elements were so powerful, death-penalty specialists said yesterday, that the jury's verdict seemed almost inevitable. The seven women and five men decided that the defendant, Ronell Wilson, should die.

    That made him the first person to face death in a federal case in New York since the 1950s, a fate that other defendants have managed to avoid, even though some of them have been accused of killing far more people. "There was a confluence of factors," said Deborah W. Denno, a professor at Fordham University School of Law. "I think it's highly unlikely there will be another case with all these particular elements anytime soon."

    For that reason, she and other lawyers interviewed yesterday said they doubted that the Wilson verdict signaled a shift in public attitudes about the death penalty. Michael Greenberger, a law professor at the University of Maryland, noted that advances in DNA testing have uncovered faulty convictions and made juries nationally more hesitant to impose the death sentence. But he said there were no such doubts in the Wilson case.

    "This case is one that shocks the conscience," he said. "The brutal nature of it, I think, aligned the stars for this kind of verdict."

    Still, some attitudes may have changed. Several years ago, when Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered United States attorneys to seek the death penalty, he ran into resistance in New York, where some prosecutors feared such a possibility could cause jurors to acquit.

    Counting Mr. Wilson, there are now 47 federal prisoners on death row. But prosecutors in New York have failed to obtain death sentences in recent years, even in closely watched terrorism trials involving embassy bombings in Africa in 1998.

    Some death-penalty opponents said that the Wilson case proved the exception because the victims were police officers.

    Ronald J. Tabak, a special counsel at the Manhattan law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and the president of New York Lawyers Against the Death Penalty, said that when New York changed its law on capital punishment in the 1960s "in what was considered a virtual abolition of the death penalty," the murder of a police officer remained a death-penalty offense.

    The last federal inmate to be executed in New York State, Gerhard Puff, in 1954, had been found guilty of killing an F.B.I. agent during a bank robbery. At the state level, no trials involved the killings of police officers between when the death penalty was reinstated in New York in 1995 and when it was invalidated in 2004, according to Kevin Doyle, the New York State criminal defender. Nor did any of the federal cases tried in New York since 2001.

    But in the Wilson case, death-penalty lawyers said, the jury could not have missed the large turnout of police officers and relatives.

    "It's hard to resist that kind of pressure," said David A. Ruhnke, a lawyer who is representing a convicted drug trafficker in another federal death-penalty case in Brooklyn, that one involving racketeering and murder.

    Last week, the judge in that case told the prosecutors that the Justice Department should drop its push for the execution of the defendant, Kenneth McGriff. The judge, Frederic Block, said that pressing on to the penalty phase of the trial would be "absurd" and "a total misappropriation" of taxpayer dollars.

    In analyzing the Wilson verdict, some death-penalty lawyers said they had figured that sooner or later, a jury in New York would vote to send a defendant to die. Mr. Tabak said that of the seven state cases that ended in death-penalty verdicts between 1995 and 2004, all but two originated in the area that makes up the federal Eastern District: Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island, and Nassau and Suffolk Counties on Long Island.

    Lawyers consider prospective jurors in those areas more likely to support the death penalty than those in Manhattan. Still, some lawyers said the importance of geography was minimal when compared to the particular circumstances of the Wilson case.

    "It was the kind of case that no matter where it tried and no matter where it was brought, the likelihood of a death verdict was high," Mr. Ruhnke said. "Sometimes the facts of a case simply blot out everything else."

    Other death-penalty lawyers said the Wilson trial differed from those involving drug dealers accused of killing other drug dealers, or those involving terrorists. Twice in 2001, a federal jury in Manhattan deadlocked over whether to impose the death penalty on three terrorists in the 1998 bombings of the American Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed more than 200 people, including 12 Americans. In the federal courts, a deadlock means the defendant is automatically sentenced to life in prison.

    Richard Burr, who was one of Timothy J. McVeigh's lawyers in the Oklahoma City bombing trial, said that a case involving a terrorist attack overseas "is not the sort of immediate, frightening incident that the killing of police officers in your own town is."

    "It's not immediate, it's not here, it's not that visceral response," he said.

    The Wilson case, which centered on the murders of Detectives James V. Nemorin and Rodney J. Andrews on a Staten Island street in 2003, had an emotional component that the lawyers said had been lacking in other death-penalty trials in New York. This was partly because such violence seemed out of place on Staten Island, and partly because the detectives were the first two officers killed by gunfire on a single day in 15 years.

    "The ingredient that this case had that the others have not had was the powerful emotions on the part of the victims' survivors, both their individual families and the police community," said Kevin McNally, a Kentucky lawyer who is director of the Federal Death Penalty Resource Counsel Project, which provides information to defense lawyers in capital cases. "You simply don't see that kind of a packed courtroom in these other trials, and jurors are affected by that."

    Nor had juries taken up a case in which the victims were police officers. David Bruck, who runs the Virginia Capital Case Clearinghouse at the Washington and Lee School of Law, said that juries "impose the death penalty to avenge the murders of people with whom they identify."

    "People identify with brave, hard-working, young police officers who lost their lives and had families and people who loved them," he said.

    In addition, Professor Denno said the way Mr. Wilson had handled himself during the trial — even sticking out his tongue as the victims' families rejoiced after the verdict — "stands out" among death-penalty defendants in this country.

    "I think people expect this from terrorists who are instigated by an ideology that of course we can't fully understand," she said. "But the American public has particular difficulty with a defendant like Ronell Wilson, who showed so little remorse, no remorse."

    Ramin Talaie for The New York Times

    Roslynn R. Mauskopf, left, the United States attorney, with Rose Nemorin, center, and MaryAnn Andrews, right, the slain detectives' widows.

    January 31, 2007

    Jury Agrees on Death Sentence for the Killer of Two Detectives

    Correction Appended

    A federal jury sentenced a 24-year-old Staten Island man to death yesterday for killing two undercover police detectives in 2003. It was the first successful federal capital punishment prosecution in New York in more than 50 years.

    After the verdict was read, the defendant, Ronell Wilson, 24, rubbed his palms, looked at his mother, then stuck his tongue out at the families of his victims. His younger brother loudly cursed the jurors, while their mother cried out that they were "the murderers now."

    The widows and other relatives of the slain detectives applauded briefly from the gallery, crying, "And the Lord rejoices."

    In December, the anonymous jury of seven men and five women convicted Mr. Wilson of shooting the two detectives, James V. Nemorin and Rodney J. Andrews, in the back of the head in a car during a weapons sting on Staten Island on March 10, 2003.

    They reached their verdict yesterday after nine hours of deliberations that started Monday afternoon. They found Mr. Wilson devoid of remorse and directed Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of federal court in Brooklyn to impose sentences of death by lethal injection on five counts.

    Three men have been executed in federal cases in the United States in recent decades, first among them Timothy J. McVeigh, for the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Mr. Wilson will join 46 other people on the federal death row.

    But in the 20 years since a moratorium on federal capital punishment was lifted, prosecutors in New York have failed to win death sentences against at least 14 defendants, including violent gang members. Federal jurors even refused to execute two terrorists involved in the bombing of United States embassies in East Africa in 1998, after their lawyers argued it would turn them into martyrs. The last federal inmate to be executed in the state was Gerhard Puff, in 1954, a bank robber convicted of killing an F.B.I. agent.

    But the murder of two undercover detectives, found bleeding on a Staten Island street in the aftermath of a botched gun transaction, resounded in a city still shaken by the terror attacks of 2001. They were the first two officers killed by gunfire on a single day since 1988.

    Working from 29 pages of questions, the jurors dissected a series of factors weighing for and against execution. Affirming elements of their conviction, they found that Mr. Wilson had acted with the intent to kill. They endorsed all the prosecution's assertions, including that Mr. Wilson would remain a danger in prison.

    The jurors, who declined interview requests conveyed by the judge, unanimously endorsed nearly all of the defense team's mitigating factors, finding that Mr. Wilson had grown up depressed, sick and trapped in a realm of poverty, deprivation, drug abuse and violence. They wrote in another factor weighing against the death penalty: "Ronell Wilson was possibly subject to peer pressure."

    But they unanimously rejected the notions that he has adjusted well to federal prison, taken responsibility for his actions or "has remorse for the murder of Detectives Andrews and Nemorin."

    Federal prosecutors vigorously sought the death penalty against Mr. Wilson, taking the case from state prosecutors in Staten Island after the New York death penalty was largely invalidated in 2004. They endorsed plea bargains with seven defendants, young men based around the Stapleton Houses project in northeastern Staten Island.

    The group members had forged their camaraderie on admiration for a slightly older man, nicknamed Keyo, who had been killed under unresolved circumstances.

    "I heard different stories," testified one group member, Mitchell Diaz, who has pleaded guilty to supplying the murder weapon.

    Bearing Keyo tattoos and T-shirts, the men gave themselves nicknames like O and Mal-G, evidence and testimony showed. Between the humdrum stuff of growing up, community college courses, talent shows and outings to Six Flags Great Adventure, they mastered gang signs, sold crack cocaine and beat and robbed their rivals.

    On that March night in 2003, the men sold a handgun to Detective Nemorin, 36, a Haitian immigrant and father of three, admired by other officers for his ability to convincingly shed dapper silk scarves for the trappings of a street tough.

    As his supervisor would later testify, Detective Nemorin arranged to buy a second gun, a Tec-9 assault pistol, at a rendezvous by the Stapleton Houses a week later. For backup, he brought Detective Andrews, 34, a Navy veteran and separated father of two with a reputation for making tough arrests.

    In a police-issued Nissan Maxima, the detectives approached the towering Stapleton Houses with a handgun for protection and a surveillance transmitter disguised as a pager. As Detective Nemorin drove, they exchanged goofy banter between calls for directions.

    On the other side of the telephone line, plans for the transaction were shifting from sale to robbery, members of the group later testified. Outside the housing project, Mr. Wilson climbed into the backseat with Jessie Jacobus, at 16 a 6-foot-3, 240-pound enforcer for the group.

    As they circled the streets, Mr. Wilson voiced suspicions of a police presence in the neighborhood.

    "It's mad hot," Mr. Wilson said, according to a surveillance recording.

    He also questioned the presence of Detective Andrews, who Detective Nemorin claimed was his brother-in-law. The detectives sought to reassure him with canny street talk and evasive driving, to little discernable effect.

    On a dark dead-end street, with no apparent warning, Mr. Wilson fired a single .44-caliber bullet into the skull of each man, starting with Detective Andrews. Gunpowder residue on Detective Nemorin's hand would later bear evidence of his efforts to survive. It was never proved whether Mr. Wilson knew his victims were officers, and an accomplice's recantation eventually prompted prosecutors to drop such charges.

    But Mr. Jacobus testified that Mr. Wilson gave a reason for the shootings in the minutes after he pulled the trigger. He quoted Mr. Wilson as saying he did it because he did not care about anybody.

    After losing their surveillance signal, police supervisors frantically searched Staten Island, only to find the blood-soaked bodies of their undercover detectives. They temporarily shut down traffic out of the borough, recalling departed ferries and closing bridges. They rounded up the crew within two days.

    The prosecutors, Colleen Kavanagh, Morris J. Fodeman and Jack Smith, assisted by Special Agent Thomas Shelton of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobaco, Firearms and Explosives, presented three weeks of testimony and evidence from members of the gang, scientific experts, civilian witnesses, investigators and audio and video surveillance recordings that led to the conviction.

    Mr. Wilson's lawyers, Ephraim Savitt, Mitchell Dinnerstein and Kelley J. Sharkey, sought to save Mr. Wilson's life by recounting the circumstances of his childhood. Before the jury retired, Mr. Wilson read a brief, heavily edited statement of remorse.

    And the prosecution, in proceedings that began two weeks ago, argued that Mr. Wilson did not deserve to live. They depicted a life of crime that started at 11 and included violent behavior in jail and out of it.

    Yesterday afternoon, the jury foreman, dressed in a suit and tie, gave the panel's answers in a loud crisp voice, glancing now and again at Mr. Wilson. He ordered the death sentence, in response to a question, with the word "yes."

    From the victim's families came calls of "God bless."

    As the jurors receded, Mr. Wilson kissed his forefinger and middle finger, then waved to his mother.

    The case could be appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, said Russell Neufeld, a capital defense lawyer who was not involved in the case. If a majority of judges upheld the sentence, it could ascend to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    If the sentence is sustained on appeal, it will be carried out by lethal injection.

    The appeal will be the second before the circuit under the modern federal death penalty. The first, from Vermont, entered the appeals court about a year ago and has yet to be decided.

    Ephraim Savitt, a lawyer for Mr. Wilson, predicted an appeal based on the jury selection process, among other issues. He lamented the sentence. "It's a very sad day for the justice system," he said, "when justice and vengeance become one and the same."

    Michael Palladino, president of the Detectives Endowment Association, said that "If any case screamed out for the death penalty," it was Wilson's.

    Roslynn R. Mauskopf, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said, "Today justice has been served, and it has been served by a jury from this community. "

    In a statement, the police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, said, "I want to commend the jury for their difficult and courageous work."

    When the courtroom was cleared, the prosecutors emerged to a sustained round of applause.

    Derek Williams, a cousin of Detective Andrews who testified in the penalty phase of the trial, said: "It is some measure of relief, but it is not full closure. It won't be full closure until the sentence is carried out."

    The relatives of Mr. Wilson walked away in the dark, under the glare of TV camera lights. He was removed from the courtroom through a different passage.

    Reporting was contributed by Clyde Haberman, Jennifer 8. Lee, William K. Rashbaum and Matthew Sweeney.

    Correction: February 3, 2007

    A front-page article on Wednesday about a death sentence handed up by a federal jury for a man who killed two police detectives on Staten Island misstated the marital status of one victim, Rodney J. Andrews, and referred incorrectly in some copies to the federal trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, who was convicted of terrorism charges related to Sept. 11 but did not receive the death penalty. Detective Andrews and his wife were separated, not divorced, and Mr. Moussaoui's case was tried by prosecutors in Virginia, not New York.


     

    Clark County Fire Department spokesman Scott Allison answers questions about Tuesday's accident at MGM Mirage's Project CityCenter. The 66-acre building site is behind him.
    Photo by
    Ronda Churchill.

    Two workers killed at Project CityCenter

    Two others injured at megaresort construction site


    By DAVID KIHARA
    REVIEW-JOURNAL

    Two construction workers were crushed to death Tuesday, and two other men were injured when a pair of 3,000-pound walls fell at the MGM Mirage's Project CityCenter building site on the Strip, authorities said.

    A little after 3 p.m., work crews were using cranes to move the two large steel walls, which act as concrete molds.

    One wall slipped and fell against the other, said Scott Allison, spokesman for the Clark County Fire Department.

    The construction workers who were killed were both on the ground when the walls toppled onto them, Allison said.

    A worker who was on top of one of the walls rode it down and suffered an injury to his abdomen but was conscious when paramedics got to him, Allison said.

    One of the walls fell on another construction worker's legs, but he managed to climb out with only minor injuries and a gash to his forehead.

    "I am amazed that he was able to push himself out, but I don't know how far underneath the wall he was," Allison said. "When you get into dire straits the adrenaline kicks in. We've heard about little old ladies who lift cars off (people)."

    The two survivors were taken to University Medical Center, but their injuries did not appear to be life-threatening, Allison said.

    Gloria Denetsosi, who said she is the fiance of one of the survivors, arrived at UMC Tuesday night saying he had called her about 5:30 p.m. with the news that he was at the hospital.

    "He told me he's doing OK," she said.

    She said her fiance and the other man injured at the site are brothers who are always together, but she declined to identify the men.

    Just hours later, a vigil was held outside UMC for the survivor of an industrial accident that killed two men Friday at The Orleans.

    One of the men had cut open a large sewage pipe to try to make repairs and fell in and the other men had tried to save him.

    Richard Luxier, 48, and Travis Koehler, 26, were killed in the sewer line that was filled with methane and hydrogen sulfide gas.

    The survivor of that incident, David Snow, remained in critical condition at UMC Tuesday night.

    The three were stuck in the sewer for at least 50 minutes.

    About three dozen co-workers and friends of the three men attended Tuesday night's vigil at UMC. They held candles as they remembered Luxier and Koehler and prayed for Snow's recovery.

    "They're just heroes. They did what they could for a fellow worker. Not a lot of people would do that," said Richard Antala, who worked with the three men at The Orleans.

    Chris Waters, a friend of Snow, said the injured man is in his late 20s, has lived in Las Vegas for 19 years, has two young daughters and worked at The Orleans for about a year.

    Snow probably wouldn't have hesitated when he saw one of his co-workers in trouble, Waters said.

    "I don't doubt for a minute that he didn't think twice before going to help his friends out," Waters said. "I've been trying to tell his wife that he's going to bounce back from this, that he's going to be 100 percent. And when he does I'm going to kick his ass."

    Allison, the county Fire Department spokesman, answered questions Tuesday at Project CityCenter just as he had at The Orleans on Friday.

    "It's another sad day at a (construction) site," he said.

    The state Occupational Safety and Health Administration is responsible for determining the causes of both accidents.

    Project CityCenter, a $7 billion, 66-acre development that is to include a 4,000-room hotel casino and retail and entertainment district, is on Las Vegas Boulevard at Harmon Avenue between the Bellagio and the Monte Carlo.

    From July 2005 to June 2006, OSHA investigated 15 work site fatalities in Clark County and 22 statewide, the agency reports. The agency looked into 15 work site deaths in Clark County and 23 statewide from July 2004 to June 2005.

    The tallies from June 2006 forward were not available Tuesday night.

    MGM Mirage spokesman Alan Feldman said Tuesday that the corporation is working with investigators to determine the cause of the accident at Project CityCenter.

    "Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of the deceased workers and for the recovery of those who were injured," Feldman said via e-mail.

    A construction worker at a neighboring site near the Bellagio said he had watched as ambulances and firetrucks converged on Project CityCenter and tried to rescue the workers.

    He said paramedics stripped one of the survivors of the accident of his clothes and wrapped him in a white sheet before rushing to the hospital.

    When asked whether, as a construction worker, he felt unsafe in light of the four deaths in five days, he said, "Accidents happen."

     

    Ralph Barrera/Austin American-Statesman, via Associated Press

    Molly Ivins in 2006.

    February 1, 2007

    Molly Ivins, Columnist, Dies at 62

    Correction Appended

    Molly Ivins, the liberal newspaper columnist who delighted in skewering politicians and interpreting, and mocking, her Texas culture, died yesterday in Austin. She was 62.

    Ms. Ivins waged a public battle against breast cancer after her diagnosis in 1999. Betsy Moon, her personal assistant, confirmed her death last night. Ms. Ivins died at her home surrounded by family and friends.

    In her syndicated column, which appeared in about 350 newspapers, Ms. Ivins cultivated the voice of a folksy populist who derided those who she thought acted too big for their britches. She was rowdy and profane, but she could filet her opponents with droll precision.

    After Patrick J. Buchanan, as a conservative candidate for president, declared at the 1992 Republican National Convention that the United States was engaged in a cultural war, she said his speech "probably sounded better in the original German."

    "There are two kinds of humor," she told People magazine. One was the kind "that makes us chuckle about our foibles and our shared humanity," she said. "The other kind holds people up to public contempt and ridicule. That's what I do."

    Hers was a feisty voice that she developed in the early 1970s at The Texas Observer, the muckraking paper that came out every two weeks and that would become her spiritual home for life.

    Her subject was Texas. To her, the Great State, as she called it, was "reactionary, cantankerous and hilarious," and its Legislature was "reporter heaven." When the Legislature is set to convene, she warned her readers, "every village is about to lose its idiot."

    Her Texas upbringing made her something of an expert on the Bush family. She viewed the first President George Bush benignly. ("Real Texans do not use the word 'summer' as a verb," she wrote.)

    But she derided the current President Bush, whom she first knew in high school. She called him Shrub and Dubya. With the Texas journalist Lou Dubose, she wrote two best-selling books about Mr. Bush: "Shrub: The Short but Happy Political Life of George W. Bush" (2000) and "Bushwhacked" (2003).

    In 2004 she campaigned against Mr. Bush's re-election, and as the war in Iraq continued, she called for his impeachment. Last month, in her last column, she urged readers to "raise hell" against the war.

    On Wednesday night, President Bush issued a statement that said he "respected her convictions, her passionate belief in the power of words, and her ability to turn a phrase."

    Mr. Bush added: "Her quick wit and commitment to her beliefs will be missed."

    Mary Tyler Ivins was born on Aug. 30, 1944, in California and grew up in the affluent Houston neighborhood of River Oaks. Her father, James, a conservative Republican, was general counsel and later president of the Tenneco Corporation, an oil and gas company.

    As a student at private school, Ms. Ivins was tall and big-boned and often felt out of place. "I spent my girlhood as a Clydesdale among thoroughbreds," she said.

    She developed her liberal views partly from reading The Texas Observer at a friend's house. Those views led to fierce arguments with her father about civil rights and the Vietnam War.

    "I've always had trouble with male authority figures because my father was such a martinet," she told Texas Monthly.

    After her father developed advanced cancer and shot himself to death in 1998, she wrote, "I believe that all the strength I have comes from learning how to stand up to him."

    Like her mother, Margot, and a grandmother, Ms. Ivins went to Smith College in Northampton, Mass. She also studied at the Institute of Political Science in Paris and earned a master's degree at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

    Her first newspaper jobs were at The Houston Chronicle and The Minneapolis Tribune, now The Star Tribune. In 1970, she jumped at the chance to become co-editor of The Texas Observer.

    Covering the Legislature, she found characters whose fatuousness helped focus her calling and define her persona, which her friends saw as populist and her detractors saw as manufactured cornpone. Even her friends marveled at how fast she could drop her Texas voice for what they called her Smith voice. Sometimes she combined them, as in, "The sine qua non, as we say in Amarillo."

    Ronnie Dugger, the former publisher of The Texas Observer, said the political circus in Texas inspired Ms. Ivins. "It was like somebody snapped the football to her and said, 'All the rules are off, this is the football field named Texas, and it's wide open,' " Mr. Dugger said.

    In 1976, her writing, which she said was often fueled by "truly impressive amounts of beer," landed her a job at The New York Times. She cut an unusual figure in The Times newsroom, wearing blue jeans, going barefoot and bringing in her dog, whose name was an expletive.

    While she drew important writing assignments, like covering the Son of Sam killings and Elvis Presley's death, she sensed she did not fit in and complained that Times editors drained the life from her prose. "Naturally, I was miserable, at five times my previous salary," she later wrote. "The New York Times is a great newspaper: it is also No Fun."

    After a stint in Albany, she was transferred to Denver to cover the Rocky Mountain States, where she continued to challenge her editors' tolerance for prankish writing.

    Covering an annual chicken slaughter in New Mexico in 1980, she used a sexually suggestive phrase, which her editors deleted from the final article. But her effort to use it angered the executive editor, A. M. Rosenthal, who ordered her back to New York and assigned her to City Hall, where she covered routine matters with little flair.

    She quit The Times in 1982 after The Dallas Times Herald offered to make her a columnist. She took the job even though she loathed Dallas, once describing it as the kind of town "that would have rooted for Goliath to beat David."

    But the newspaper, she said, promised to let her write whatever she wanted. When she declared of a congressman, "If his I.Q. slips any lower, we'll have to water him twice a day," many readers were appalled, and several advertisers boycotted the paper. In her defense, her editors rented billboards that read: "Molly Ivins Can't Say That, Can She?" The slogan became the title of the first of her six books.

    After The Times Herald folded in 1991, she wrote for The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, until 1992, when her column was syndicated by Creators Syndicate.

    Ms. Ivins, who never married, is survived by a brother, Andy, of London, Tex., and a sister, Sara Ivins Maley, of Albuquerque. One of her closest friends was Ann Richards, the former Texas governor, who died last year. The two shared an irreverence for power and a love of the Texas wilds.

    "Molly is a great raconteur, with a long memory," Ms. Richards said, "and she's the best person in the world to take on a camping trip because she's full of good-ol'-boy stories."

    Ms. Ivins worked at a breakneck pace, adding television appearances, book tours, lectures and fund-raising to a crammed writing schedule. She also wrote for Esquire, The Atlantic Monthly and The Nation.

    An article about her in 1996 in The Star-Telegram suggested that her work overload might have caused an increase in factual errors in her columns. (She eventually hired a fact-checker.) And in 1995, the writer Florence King accused Ms. Ivins of lifting passages Ms. King had written and using them in 1988 for an article in Mother Jones. Ms. Ivins had credited Ms. King six times in the article but not in two lengthy sentences, and she apologized to Ms. King.

    Ms. Ivins learned she had breast cancer in 1999 and was typically unvarnished in describing her treatments. "First they mutilate you; then they poison you; then they burn you," she wrote. "I have been on blind dates better than that."

    But she kept writing her columns and kept writing and raising money for The Texas Observer.

    Indeed, rarely has a reporter so embodied the ethos of her publication. On the paper's 50th anniversary in 2004, she wrote: "This is where you can tell the truth without the bark on it, laugh at anyone who is ridiculous, and go after the bad guys with all the energy you have."

    Correction: February 3, 2007

    An obituary on Thursday about the political humor columnist Molly Ivins included incorrect information from Creator Syndicate about the year she began writing for the syndicate. It was 1992, not 2001. The obituary also incorrectly described River Oaks, where she was reared, in some copies. It is part of Houston; it has not been a suburb since the 1920s.

     
     

    Josh Haner/The New York Times

    Carlos Arredondo, Wednesday in Times Square with a memorial to his son, a marine killed in Iraq.

    February 1, 2007

    A Father With a Coffin, Telling of War's Grim Toll

    Carlos Arredondo leaned toward the coffin in the back of his pickup truck yesterday and renewed a promise to his dead son, one that he has kept for more than two years.

    In a whisper, he vowed never to let his son's death be forgotten. He closed his eyes and slid his right hand across the American flag stretched over the coffin, his fingertips tumbling over each of its faded red stripes.

    "This is my whole world," he said, facing the truck, his arms open wide. "This is my burden."

    Mr. Arredondo, 46, stood on West 43rd Street in Times Square, shivering in the morning chill. His son, Lance Cpl. Alexander S. Arredondo, 20, was a marine killed in Iraq in 2004 while fighting in Najaf.

    Passers-by slowed or stopped to view Mr. Arredondo's mobile memorial: the coffin, filled with his son's prized possessions, and the green Nissan truck, each side adorned with poster-size photos of the young marine. Some pictures show him smiling, his teeth bright white. Others show a machine-gun-toting warrior in battle gear. Another shows him lying dead at his funeral.

    The display is sad, personal and emotionally jarring. But this is how Mr. Arredondo honors and mourns his son, who was a fire team leader in Battalion Landing Team 1/4, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable), First Marine Expeditionary Force. This is how Mr. Arredondo heals.

    "As long as there are marines fighting and dying in Iraq, I'm going to share my mourning with the American people," he said.

    Mr. Arredondo, who lives in Boston, travels the country putting his sorrow on display. He accepts donations along the way. The coffin he takes with him holds some of his son's things: a soccer ball, a pair of his favorite shoes, a Winnie the Pooh. He also shows people his son's boots, uniform and dog tags.

    Healing has been long and slow. First there was denial and self-destruction.

    It all began on Aug. 25, 2004, Mr. Arredondo said, his 44th birthday. A government van eased in front of his home, then in Hollywood, Fla., and three Marine officers in dress blues stepped out.

    At first Mr. Arredondo thought it was his son making a surprise birthday visit. Instead, the officers told him that his son had been killed in a hail of gunfire after being trapped in a four-story hotel that his platoon had been clearing. They were surrounded by enemy fighters. It was his son's second tour of duty in Iraq.

    "I just screamed," he said. "I said 'No, no! It can't be my son.' "

    Mr. Arredondo said he "lost it." He ran to his garage and grabbed a gallon of gasoline and a propane torch.

    He took a sledgehammer and smashed the government van's windshield and hopped inside. As the officers tried to calm him, Mr. Arredondo doused himself and the van with gasoline and lit the torch.

    There was an explosion, and the officers dragged Mr. Arredondo to safety. He suffered second- and third-degree burns over 20 percent of his body.

    "I went to my son's funeral on a stretcher," he said.

    After nearly 10 months of healing, including several in the hospital, Mr. Arredondo became a full-time war protester, quitting work as a handyman to remind people across the country of the human price of war.

    His son was posthumously awarded a Purple Heart. But no commendation will fill the void he left behind, Mr. Arredondo said.

    "Every day we have G.I.'s being killed, and people don't really care enough or do enough to protest about how the war is going," Mr. Arredondo said yesterday. "Some people say I'm dishonoring my son by doing this, but this is my pain, my loss."


     

    Nicole Bengiveno/The New York Times

    FORTY WINKS At Yelo in New York, Marilyne Neuchat indulges in a nap while Kendall Eaton gives her a hand reflexology treatment.

    Lars Klove for The New York Times

    PILLOW TALK There are now so many products dedicated to inducing sleep that an insomniac might try counting them instead of sheep, including body washes, balms, mists and aromatic roll-ons to apply to pulse points.

    February 1, 2007
    Skin Deep

    Hey, Sleepy, Want to Buy a Good Nap?

    ALEXIUS OTTO, a junior at Hunter College in Manhattan, has a perfectly good bed in his apartment in the East Village. But twice over the last month he has paid to take short snoozes at Yelo, a new salon on West 57th Street that sells anxious New Yorkers the promise of a brief but cocooning sleep.

    Yelo consists of seven private chambers that can be rented for 20- to 40-minute naps. Each hexagonal pod has a beige leather recliner, dimmed lighting, a soporific soundtrack and a blanket of Nepalese cashmere. Clients may also book reflexology treatments, designed to lull the body to sleep, for their hands or feet starting at $65.

    On a recent Thursday, Mr. Otto lounged on a bench in Yelo's lobby, waiting for a sleeping pod to become available. He was hoping that a nap in a cubicle far from the distractions of home would help balance his chaotic college life. He often forgoes sleep in favor of studying, meeting friends and looking for part-time work, he said.

    "I'm going out tonight to meet someone about a job," said Mr. Otto, who was visiting a friend nearby and had dropped in for a 20-minute nap. Cost: $12. "The nap will help refocus me."

    Sleep is the new bottled water. Although it can be had free, it is increasingly being marketed as an upscale amenity. Nationwide, sales of prescription sleeping medications reached about $3 billion in the first nine months of last year, according to IMS Health, a healthcare research firm. That does not include the more than $20 billion spent on nocturnal accouterments like pillowtop mattresses, adjustable beds, hypoallergenic pillows, white-noise machines and monogrammed cashmere pajamas.

    And now, at a time when spas are treating everything from acne to smoking addiction, sleep is becoming a province of the wellness industry. Spa Finder, a company that compiles spa directories and publishes Luxury Spa Finder magazine, is forecasting sleep as a top spa trend for 2007.

    "More clients are talking about it and more spas are offering treatments," said Susie Ellis, the president of Spa Finder. "We are starting to see some spas doing sleep medicine or sleep education programs while others are creating sleep environments with enhanced bedding and wake-up systems that don't involve loud alarm clocks."

    But do Americans truly need more sleep? An often-quoted estimate from the National Center on Sleep Disorders Research of the National Institutes of Health said that up to 70 million Americans — almost one out of three adults — have some kind of sleep problem.

    But the Center for the Advancement of Health, a nonprofit group in Washington that advocates using science as a basis for making health decisions, has criticized the statistic in its newsletter, saying that it is based more on extrapolation than on hard epidemiological data.

    Jessie Gruman, the president of the center, likened the occasional sleepless night to adolescence, menopause and balding, calling them all "normal human conditions that have become medicalized."

    "Now when people can't sleep for a couple of nights, they think they are part of a national sleep epidemic and there should be something to fix it," Ms. Gruman said. "You can buy sexual arousal, a new shape for your face, a skinnier silhouette, so why shouldn't you be able to buy sleep?"

    According to TNS Media Intelligence, pharmaceutical companies spent almost $362 million in the first nine months of last year on advertisements for the most popular sleeping pills, marketing the idea that interrupted sleep or the lack of instantaneous sleep are alarming conditions that require intervention.

    Sleep is the top concern among her clientele of hypercompetitive stockbrokers, time-pressed mothers and overworked students, said Abby Fazio, the chief pharmacist and an owner of New London Pharmacy on Eighth Avenue in Chelsea.

    "The No. 1 question I get is: 'How can I fall asleep without a prescription?' " said Ms. Fazio, who counsels clients in a small frosted-glass room behind shelves stocked with homeopathic remedies. "Back when I started working here as a student in the 1970s, only the elderly were on sleeping aids, but now it's everybody ages 25 to 40."

    There are no end of products to treat self-diagnosed sleep problems. Ms. Fazio recommends nonprescription melatonin pills as well as herbal items that contain lavender or chamomile and are meant to induce calm before bedtime, leading to a more restful sleep, she said.

    Well-known cosmetics and toiletry brands have also starting selling sleep. Dove has introduced Calming Night, a line of honey-infused products like soap and body wash. And Boots, the brand from the British chemist that Target sells, has created Sleep, an aromatherapy line that includes a lavender bath milk and a balm to be rubbed on the hands or temples.

    But such products may provide more of a Proustian experience than quantifiably improved sleep.

    "If your grandmother used lavender and you associate it with feeling safe, calm, loved and ready to go to sleep, then a lavender product will be fantastic for you," said Sandra Cox, a formulation scientist at Boots. "But proving how the essential oils work on the brain is very difficult to do in clinical studies."

    Spas, too, have found a growing market.

    Canyon Ranch was a pioneer in the field, introducing a sleep program in 1995. The company's spas in Tucson and Lenox, Mass., offer work-ups with a doctor to determine the cause of sleep disturbances. Treatments include therapy to change sleep patterns, and breathing, meditation or visualization exercises to help reduce anxiety. The spas also offer treatments like aromatherapy massages.

    "Counting sheep works for some people, lavender works for other people, and other people respond to breathing techniques," said Dr. Karen Koffler, a specialist in integrative medicine who is the medical director at Canyon Ranch Living, Miami Beach, a residential property scheduled to open later this year. "The thing is to find the method that works for you."

    Other spas concentrate on nighttime pampering.

    Lake Austin Spa Resort, for example, offers a "Texas Starry Night" treatment, an evening massage using lavender oil. Tracy York, the general manager, said the spa is developing a facial to be called "Night Night" and is considering issuing clients chamomile teabags to put over their eyes before sleep or aromatherapy "sleep patches" for the skin.

    And now, for urbanites unable to travel to a remote lakeside spa for beauty sleep, there is the Yelo salon in Midtown where a reflexology treatment for the hands followed by a 20-minute nap costs $77.

    Just don't call it a sleep spa.

    "It's a corporate wellness center," said Nicolas Ronco, the entrepreneur who opened Yelo in early January. "For people who are overstressed and overworked, for lawyers or brokers who abuse themselves, a power nap is a way to recharge naturally without caffeine."

    Yelo is designed for the harried, BlackBerry-toting, Bluetooth-connected executive in search of high-tech hibernation. It is not the first place where an urban animal can cuddle up and doze off. In Manhattan, a sleep salon called MetroNaps, with chairs encased in spherical hoods, opened in the Empire State Building in 2004, followed by a second location downtown. Some offices also provide places for employees to doze off.

    On Yelo's Web site, heloyelo.com, and in its salon window, a display charts the minutes until the next "YeloCab" (napping booth) is available. Clients pay for a time slot and are then escorted to a private pod for a relaxation treatment or a quick nap.

    Inside the pods, clients can electronically adjust the angle of the leather recliners; Mr. Ronco recommended raising the leg rest above the head to slow one's heart rate. When time runs out, ceiling lights gradually brighten, an awakening prompt meant to mimic dawn.

    Mr. Ronco predicted that Yelo would appeal to commuters who want to stay in Manhattan for a late dinner and to club-goers seeking respite before a night out.

    "I see 25 Yelo centers in New York, and then in every crazy low-quality-of-life city where people lack space," Mr. Ronco said. "I see this in airports, malls, corporate offices and train stations."

    But are naps the best way for the sleep-challenged to catch up?

    Dr. William C. Dement, the founder of the Stanford University sleep research center, thinks so, recommending them as a way to treat sleep deprivation, according to his book "The Promise of Sleep."

    Dr. Gerard T. Lombardo, the director of the sleep center at New York Methodist Hospital in Brooklyn, however, counsels against naps because they may disrupt the normal nighttime sleep cycle. Daytime exercise would be a better way to improve sleep, he said.

    Dr. Koffler of Canyon Ranch cautioned that people beset by chronic sleep problems should see a doctor. For those who have the occasional sleepless night and are seeking relaxation, though, a salon nap or a massage could be soothing, she said.

    "If it allows someone to move from a busy outer life to a calm inner one, I'm all for it," Dr. Koffler said.

    Ms. Gruman of the Center for the Advancement of Health said the idea of paying for a nap amounts to "cognitive dissonance."

    "I can't believe people think there is magic in the pods or the cashmere blanket," Ms. Gruman said. "But maybe they think they are going to get better sleep if they spend a lot of money."