| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Month: April 2006
-
-
Alonso top in San Marino GP second practice
Fernando Alonso
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
Alonso top in San Marino GP second practice
Racing series F1
Date 2006-04-21
By Nikki Reynolds - Motorsport.com
Renault's Fernando Alonso was at the top of the time sheet after the second free practice for the San Marino Grand Prix with a best of 1:25.043. He was just under three tenths slower than Michael Schumacher's fastest time of the morning session. Schumacher's Ferrari was second in the afternoon and BMW Sauber No.3 Robert Kubica was third.
The track temperature had climbed a few degrees from the morning, up to around 30, while the air was about five degrees lower. Super Aguri's Yuji Ide led out for the installation laps, along with Kubica, the MF1s of Christijan Albers, Tiago Monteiro and third driver Giorgio Mondini, and Honda No.3 Anthony Davidson.
Then came Takuma Sato's Super Aguri and the Toro Rossos of Tonio Liuzzi, Scott Speed and third driver Neel Jani followed on. Sato was first to record a time but was immediately eclipsed by several drivers in quick succession with Mondini taking the top spot after the order panned out, 1:31.080. In turn he was dropped by Liuzzi's 1:29.905.
Davidson took over with a 1:28.509 and Mondini returned to second, only to be ousted by Albers. Wurz took third and behind the Williams it was Liuzzi, Mondini, Jani, Monteiro, Sato, Speed and Ide. Wurz improved to the top spot, 1:28.378, and Davidson was less than a tenth behind. Albers was seven tenths adrift in third.
Red Bull third driver Robert Doornbos clocked fifth and Speed moved up to sixth. Kubica took the second slot, half a tenth down on Wurz, who had improved to 1:27.945. Jarno Trulli's Toyota arrived in fourth and Kimi Raikkonen's McLaren went straight to the top on his first flyer, 1:27.325 for nearly four tenths ahead of Trulli, who took second.
Raikkonen lowered his time to 1:26.782 to leave Trulli nine tenths down and Juan Pablo Montoya made it a McLaren one-two when he slotted in behind Raikkonen for second, marginally ahead of Trulli. Wurz then split the McLarens with six and a half tenths off Raikkonen, only to have Montoya rebound to second and close the gap to three tenths.
Rubens Barrichello was the first Honda race driver to appear for the day and posted fifth. Felipe Massa led out for Ferrari and took second, just over a tenth off Raikkonen, and teammate Michael followed into third. Renault's Giancarlo Fisichella clocked fifth on his first effort then Michael went quickest, 1:25.470, over a second up on Raikkonen.
Alonso started in the midfield then picked up to second, nine tenths off Michael. Raikkonen, Fisichella and Massa followed Alonso and then came Montoya, Davidson, Wurz, Trulli and Liuzzi to complete the top 10. By half way through the other third drivers had been relegated to the midfield and eight drivers had yet to set a time, including the BMW Sauber and Williams racers.
Jacques Villeneuve was the first BMW Sauber on the time sheet shortly afterwards, 22nd. Kubica went back into the top 10 for sixth and Barrichello did likewise to take third but was quickly relieved of the position by Montoya. Wurz went up to sixth and Villeneuve to 14th, then Wurz improved again to go second, fractionally in front of Montoya.
Davidson climbed a couple of places to fifth and Villeneuve another two to 12th. The Red Bulls of David Coulthard and Christian Klien were 13th and 15th respectively and Ralf Schumacher's Toyota was down in 20th. Massa, who had been shuffled down the order, went back up to seventh and Michael remained at the top for some time.
Alonso closed the gap to the lead Ferrari to two and a half tenths and Jenson Button's Honda joined the front runners in fifth. Massa, who had been demoted again, was back to sixth and with 20 minutes to go the activity tailed off a little. Trulli, who had dropped outside the top 10, improved to third behind Michael and Alonso.
Nico Rosberg's Williams edged onto the time sheet in 25th then climbed to 17th, but lost the place to Speed. Kubica improved to third and then Davidson to second, a couple of hundredths ahead of Alonso, while Liuzzi and Albers traded the 13th spot. Rosberg bounced back to 14th and Nick Heidfeld got his BMW Sauber on the list in 18th.
In the last 10 minutes only the Williams of Mark Webber had not set a time. Heidfeld took to the top 10 with eighth and Webber finally clocked a time to take 22nd. The close of session activity saw Alonso return to second, just four thousandths behind Michael, then Kubica beat the pair of them with a 1:25.421, half a tenth up.
It was short lived as Alonso wound up another flyer and clocked 1:25.043, nearly four tenths quicker. Michael took second, fractionally quicker than Kubica, and Massa moved back up the times for the umpteenth time to take fifth behind Davidson. And that was pretty much the end of the hour.
"As usual on the Friday, the grip levels were quite bad," said Alonso. "That makes the car inconsistent to drive, and we began working on the set-up to try and improve things. We are not there yet, and we are suffering from too much understeer at the moment. I think we are quick as well but as always, the times on Friday don't mean too much. If we can make some good changes tonight, though, I think we will be a in a strong situation for the race."
Michael was happy enough with Ferrari's day. "We have made progress in various areas and even if they are only minor things, all put together they have produced a good step forward," he commented. "The whole package is working better and therefore the car is quicker. I think we can fight for pole tomorrow and I even believe we can be in the hunt for the win on Sunday. I say it again, I am optimistic."
Kubica focused mainly on tyres. "This is my first ever Formula One practice in Europe," he said. "I already knew Imola, but they have changed the chicane and re-asphalted some corners. Where the grip level was poor the car was very unstable. We have worked to choose the best tyres, mainly concentrating on doing long runs to see the degradation, and I think we have done two really good sessions."
On a Friday it's really not possible to pinpoint who is most competitive but the general picture presented no big surprises. Overall Ferrari and Renault appeared to be the pacesetters with McLaren, Honda, Toyota and BMW mixed up behind. Final top eight classification: Alonso, M. Schumacher, Kubica, Davison, Massa, Fisichella, Trulli, Wurz. -
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
Robert Kubica
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
Tiago Monteiro
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
Kimi Raikkonen
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
Michael Schumacher
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
Michael Schumacher
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-21 (Imola): Friday practice 1
-
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Tamara Ecclestone, daughter of Bernie
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Jarno Trulli
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Nico Rosberg
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursd
Giancarlo Fisichella
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Giancarlo Fisichella and Bernie Ecclestone
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Fernando Alonso
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday -
Ready for a bumpy ride at Imola
Welcome to Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari
F1 > San Marino GP, 2004-04-22 (Imola): Postcard from Imola
Image by Honda F1 Press Office
Ready for a bumpy ride at Imola
Racing series F1
Date 2006-04-19
By Nikki Reynolds - Motorsport.com
Now F1 has returned to Europe for the San Marino Grand Prix, the state of the championship is similar to the same time last season. Renault has won all three of the early flyaway races, Fernando Alonso taking two victories and Giancarlo Fisichella one, as they did in 2005. Alonso won at Imola last year after a fight with Ferrari's Michael Schumacher; will we see the battle rejoined this coming weekend?
Renault is setting the benchmark in 2006 but the competition looks quite close to the French squad. "Ferrari and McLaren will be our main opponents," is Alonso's opinion of how things will be at Imola. "Ferrari dropped down in the last two races, but I think they will be back. Their tyres work well at this circuit, and it is their home Grand Prix, so I expect them to be extremely competitive."
It could be a bumpy ride for the drivers as far as their chances of victory are concerned and Imola's kerbs will also give them a jolt or two. The circuit is rather stop-and-go in nature due to the corners and chicanes and the downforce requirements are quite high. Brakes and braking stability are also a major consideration and riding the kerbs puts pressure on the chassis and suspension.
"To get quick lap times at Imola, you have to really attack the kerbs and because they are so high, probably more so than at most tracks, we have to keep the car quite soft so it rides the kerbs well," said McLaren's Kimi Raikkonen. "The best place to overtake at Imola would be the Tosa hairpin, both under braking and also exiting, and you also tend to see a lot of cars running wide providing more opportunities."
There are a lot of rumours going around about Raikkonen and Ferrari in the run up to San Marino but Michael Schumacher is keeping focused on the job. Ferrari surprised many people with its competitiveness at Imola last year and while it's been another unsettled start to the season for the reds, Schumacher believes victory is not out of the question for the team at its home event.
"We want to do well at Imola and we want to be among the title challengers," said the German, who will take part in his usual charity football match ahead of the race. "We have fine tuned our package during the tests and I think that we have a car with which we can compete for victory. I do not believe that the gap to the leaders is too big to close. Imola should be the first step towards this."
Toyota had a bit of a turbulent time in the break since Australia, with chassis technical director Mike Gascoyne abruptly departing due to differences of opinion with the team. Toyota has been rather disappointing so far and it remains to be seen what effect Gascoyne's absence may have. Ralf Schumacher, who took his first F1 victory at Imola in 2001, improved the situation with third in Melbourne.
"We could face cold conditions in Imola but you never know what the weather will bring there," he said. "We struggled at the start of the year in cool conditions but we made the podium in Australia so that shows how far we've come. Of course the season has started off harder than we expected but Australia was much better and the team is strong enough to keep bouncing back."
Honda is another team that people perhaps expected more from than the early results have produced so far. Rubens Barrichello has struggled with the car and while Jenson Button has been on pole position and the podium, Honda hasn't yet shown the race pace to contend for victory. Still, that could easily change and the team is optimistic for a good result after the dismal time in Melbourne.
"Obviously we were extremely disappointed with our performance in Australia," said Button, who lost a points finish when his car came to a halt just yards from the finish line at Albert Park with his engine spouting smoke and flames. "However we have made good progress in testing and I am confident we will be competitive in Imola. Hopefully it should be a good weekend for us."
BMW Sauber enjoyed its first double-points result in Australia and is currently just three points behind Honda in the constructors' standings. Despite its early protestations that this season was going to be really tough, the cars actually look quite competitive in race trim and appear to be steadily improving. But it seems there is some concern about the engines this weekend.
Nick Heidfeld and Jacques Villeneuve will use the same engines at Imola that they had in Australia. "Both engines are still at the stage of development we had reached prior to the race in Melbourne," said BMW motorsport director Mario Theissen. "And, with its high downforce requirement and uphill sections, Imola is a track which generally puts a lot of strain on the engines."
Former BMW partner Williams has also looked fairly competitive in the early season -- when the cars manage to stay in the race that is. Mark Webber and Nico Rosberg were both in the points in Bahrain but neither has reached the chequered flag since, mostly due to a variety of car failures. They will at least have fresh Cosworth engines this weekend which should, in theory, help.
"I'm looking forward to my first Formula One race in Imola," said Rosberg. "Bridgestone have made some good progress on their compounds for cooler temperatures, as we saw in Melbourne. The team's test went well in Barcelona last week and I believe we made good progress, especially with the aero package. I know the Imola track from GP2 so that will be a help to me, definitely, so we will see how it goes."
Alonso has singled out Ferrari and McLaren as the major threats for San Marino but really one would have to think that Renault still has the upper hand. Of course, there's no such thing as a dead cert -- the thrills and spills of Melbourne proved how easily the unexpected can happen and, to be honest, it's usually much more entertaining when it does. -
FIA press conference: Nico Rosberg, Michael Schumacher, Vitantonio Liuzzi and Jarno Trulli
FIA press conference: Nico Rosberg, Michael Schumacher, Vitantonio Liuzzi and Jarno Trulli
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
San Marino GP: Thursday press conference
Racing series F1
Date 2006-04-20
San Marino Grand Prix FIA Thursday press conference transcript with
Vitantonio Liuzzi (Toro Rosso)
Nico Rosberg (Williams)
Michael Schumacher (Ferrari)
Jarno Trulli (Toyota)
Q: Nico, how much of a difference does knowing this circuit make to you?
Nico Rosberg: I think it's going to help me, for sure. Just coming here often makes you more comfortable, you know what's awaiting you, you can go out and you can push straight away, you don't have to find your way around for the first few laps. So I think that's going to be a bit of a help for me, for sure.
Q: You've obviously shown speed during the first few races, but the reliability hasn't been so hot; what are your feelings about that coming to this race?
Nico Rosberg: Yeah. We've worked flat out on the reliability, especially in the factory and also in testing and everything. I think we've made some good progress but in the end, we are just going to have to wait and see if we last the race.
Q: What have you been up to since the last race; you didn't do any testing...
Nico Rosberg: I've had a bit of relaxation, actually. I had a nice Easter with the family and everything. It was very nice. It was good to get away from racing also for a couple of days.
Q: So are you ready to come back?
Nico Rosberg: Ah, for sure, now, ready, on it, I feel good and really looking forward to this weekend.
Q: Tonio, is the motorhome big enough?
Vitantonio Liuzzi: It's not big enough, I think, we can make it better! No, compared to last year it's a big improvement but now there are two families living in it so maybe the one from last year was a bit small. I think Red Bull have shown again how strong they are in this kind of job and they did really good things with the big motorhome, the big tree house for the engineers. I think we have got a lot of space to play with.
Q: You mean for girlfriends...
Vitantonio Liuzzi: Both.
Q: Tonio, since the last race you've tested for Red Bull Racing as well. How did you find that?
Vitantonio Liuzzi: I was really happy because I tested a V8 engine for the first time and I definitely saw the technical difference between the two, and I was really impressed by the difference and how to utilise the two engines. The Red Bull car was pretty interesting because it was quite a big step into the ex-RB1. They did a really good job and the car is really good. Regarding the engine, I think the V8 is different, it has got a really short range of torque but in the areas where it works I think it is really strong, so I don't think that, as many reports said, that the V10 can be an advantage because I felt the V8 was really strong in that range. For sure, it is a little bit different in the bottom slower corners but after, when you pick up the right revs, I have to say that it has big power. So I was pretty impressed about the car, especially because I think the team did a really good job developing the RB2 and now I think they will soon be getting the results they deserve.
Q: What about your teammate? He's been pretty quick in the first three races. Is he pushing you a little bit?
Vitantonio Liuzzi: Yeah, he's doing a good job, I think. He's a rookie and he can be quick in qualifying, especially he can make some good laps. But he needs to work a little bit on the consistency but in Formula One you don't get into it in a few races, you need to learn experience and cover kilometres so I think he's doing some good performances but for sure he's still got a lot to learn.
Q: Jarno, have you recovered from your ear infection that you suffered in Australia?
Jarno Trulli: Slowly, but yes. I'm actually still recovering but I feel much better now.
Q: How does it affect you, because very often the ear affects balance?
Jarno Trulli: Yeah, effectively it was imbalance if I could keep my ears open. As soon as I could close them, it was OK so I spent most of my time with my ears closed, so I couldn't hear much but I was well balanced and I was actually feeling better.
Q: But you feel OK for this race?
Jarno Trulli: Yeah, I have felt OK for the last week. I've been taking some specific antibiotics which only affect the ears and now it's definitely a good step.
Q: Your teammate scored a podium in Australia; what sort of effect has that had on the team?
Jarno Trulli: It was definitely a good boost for the team because after a slow start at the beginning, we needed a bit of a result and now the results are coming and we are definitely moving forwards because Ralf's podium showed that the performance can be reached during a test weekend. And during the last (test) session at Barcelona I showed very good performance, always topping the time (sheets) and this is definitely giving the team a good boost.
Q: But at the same time, you've lost the technical director.
Jarno Trulli: Yeah, this is part of Formula One: people coming and people going and that's what happened with Mike.
Q: Is that going to have an effect on the team?
Jarno Trulli: At the moment, no. He hasn't really been replaced because Pascal Vasselon has replaced him for the moment before they take a long term decision but in the end, there were a lot of people working behind Mike who have done great things for the team. But anyway, he has also created a lot of people around him, helping him do his job, so at the moment the situation is under control.
Q: Michael, this was probably your strongest race last year; how do you feel about this year? It was also a good circuit for Bridgestone.
Michael Schumacher: Yeah, I'm not sure what it was worth last year. It's important to see what we can do this year, and the more information we have, we believe pretty strongly that we can be very competitive here.
Q: You have a new engine here; how important is it for you, drivers, to have a new engine for this race in particular, given the developments that will have come through from the first three races?
Michael Schumacher: Obviously we have a new engine spec which gives you extra performance. It doesn't really matter whether this engine is then one or two races old because it is always planned to be for two races and should have equal performance for the first and the second race. So we're pretty happy that we have been able to bring this engine here and yeah, it's a step forward, but it was pretty much planned anyway to have it. It wasn't planned to have it for here, in a way, because naturally we would have raced the same engine here as we did in Australia -- but that's the way it is.
Q: Do you think we will see a slightly strange race because some people have got the old engines and some have the new spec engines?
Michael Schumacher: Not at all because the spec changes are pretty minimal. We can't talk about big steps -- not on the engine side anyway, so I don't think it makes a big difference, plus, as I said, teams really should have an engine which is as good for the first as it is for the second race.
Q: There's been some talk about Ferrari introducing a seamless shift gearboxes, which I believe you are very keen on. Is that the case?
Michael Schumacher: We are developing one certainly, but when to use it? We don't know. We know the worth of it but we don't want to lose races over it.
Q: One of the engineers for a team that does have a seamless shift thinks it will be worth 0.4 seconds a lap at Imola.
Michael Schumacher: I think that if he believes in that, then great.
Q: There's been speculation on when you might make up your mind about next year. Have you got anything to add to what you've already said?
Michael Schumacher: No.
Q: Michael, Ross Brawn has said that this is not a decisive race but a key one. Do you agree?
Michael Schumacher: I agree in that every race from now on is very important. We took our jokers already unfortunately at an early time of the year. From now on we have to make up ground for the points that we lost through problems at the first three races.
Q: Michael, when do you think you will announce you will stay with Ferrari next year?
Michael Schumacher: I'm pretty sure that once a decision is taken, we'll inform everybody who is willing to listen. I haven't set a specific day or time of the day to make my decision, honestly.
Q: The kerbs have always been important at Imola. I've only just arrived, but I've noticed a few of the big kerbs have been taken away and it seems a few of the teams didn't expect that to happen. What did you know about the plans to remove the kerbs and what do you think it will mean for Sunday?
Michael Schumacher: Basically, the change of one chicane and therefore two kerbs was known to all of us who wanted to listen. As I said, it's one corner with two kerbs. All the other kerbs are still there.
Q: Which corner is that?
Michael Schumacher: Variante Alta.
Q: Michael, regarding the start of season, how important is it psychologically for the team to have a good result here?
Michael Schumacher: It is always good to have good result, but it won't break us, whatever happens here. There have been people putting words in my mouth that this is a crucial race but it's not. It's an important race, but not a crucial one, and whatever happens will happen. We trust in our people and our package and it's time to stop talking about it -- it's time to show it.
Q: Michael, what improvements have you made in testing between Australia and today?
Michael Schumacher: We made a step forward on the car, so it will be interesting to see who made the biggest one.
Q: I was talking to Jackie Stewart over the last three races, and he achieved a lot in his career. He said that when you have a huge career, full of success, it's very important to end it on a high. Do you agree with that?
Michael Schumacher: Not really. It would be nice if you do so, but everybody has different priorities and other characters and I believe nothing matters as long as you enjoy it. I always enjoy winning races to losing them.
Q: Michael, the enjoying factor. How was last year?
Michael Schumacher: Mixed. Very mixed. Honestly there were some very frustrating races, which were not good, and some enjoyable and interesting races -- and not necessarily the ones where I finished on the podium. Take Monte Carlo. I really enjoyed that race -- I had fun -
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
A paddock beauty
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Bernie Ecclestone
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Tamara Ecclestone is the new presenter for Red Bull Racing
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Tamara Ecclestone is the new presenter for Red Bull Racing
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday
Viewed 1 time
McLaren transporter
F1 > San Marino GP, 2006-04-20 (Imola): Thursday -
Today's Blogs
Tel Aviv Terror
By Darren Everson
Posted Monday, April 17, 2006, at 7:07 PM ET
Bloggers react with outrage to the suicide bombing in Israel on Monday. They also wonder why the Pentagon has war plans for everythingincluding invading Canadaand whether the White House tried to downplay the presence of gays at its annual Easter egg roll.
Tel Aviv terror: A Palestinian suicide bomber killed at least nine people and wounded doznes at a falafel restaurant outside a Tel Aviv bus station Monday, the first attack since Hamas took over the Palestinian government just more than two weeks ago. Islamic Jihad and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade both took responsibility for the attack, which Hamas defended, saying Palestinians were in "a state of self-defense."
"Sure," writes Jewish blogger Meryl Yourish. "Self-defense. In Tel Aviv. At a bus station. At a falafel shop. Those are dangerous people, falafel-eaters." "Will this show the world their true faces?" writes Holly on The Moderate Voice of Hamas.
Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, reportedly condemned the bombing, but no one seems to be buying that. At Captain's Quarters, Ed Morrissey has a name for this pattern of one group attacking while one or two others condemn: the triangle offense.
"As I have written before, this triangle offense allows the supposedly moderate Fatah and the political Hamas to deny any responsibility for attacks while the radical IJ carries them out," he writes. "This strategy gives at least one and usually two factions deniability that is transparent to everyone except European diplomats, Russian autocrats, and the Middle Eastern kleptocrats that just pledged millions of dollars to keep the Palestinians in business against the Israelis."
Captain Ed is referring to Iran's pledge Sunday to give the Palestinian government $50 million in aid. Sister Toldjah explores the Hamas-Iran connection in detail, culling recent reports from the BBC and elsewhere.
As for the attack itself, Neo-Neocon links to a Jerusalem Post article and notes that a security guard may have saved lives by detaining the suicide bomber outside the restaurant: "The article doesn't mention it, but it's virtually certain that that guard was one of the victims. But he was also a hero; no doubt about that."
Bloggers are also eager to see how Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister-elect, responds to the first attack of his tenure. "The real question," writes New Jersey blogger Lawhawk at A Blog For All, "is whether he will carry through with what must be done - finish the security fence and go after the terrorists who perpetrated this latest attack. And that means doing more than firing artillery against empty buildings or fields."
Read more about the bombing.
Iran tomorrow, Canada the next day? The initial reaction to Seymour Hersh's New Yorker report of Iran war planning was largely outrage at the Bush administration. But as the debate continuesthe Washington Post and the New York Times ran op-ed contributions on the subject over the weekendbloggers wonder: Shouldn't the Pentagon have plans for everything?
That was conservative Jonah Goldberg's point when he debated liberal John Aravosis of AMERICAblog on Howard Kurtz's Reliable Sources on CNN Sunday. "After all preventing states like Iran -- indeed, specifically Iran -- from getting nukes has been the core of American foreign policy since the end of the Cold War," Goldberg writes at The Corner on National Review Online. "I should hope, I said, that the Pentagon has plans to attack Iran, North Korea etc. Heck, it's their job." To illustrate his point, Goldberg mentioned that the Pentagon even has plans to attack Canada.
That provoked surprise north of the border"I wonder if the US has plans for war with Mexico as well," writes Canadian blogger Red Toryand a snarky response from Steve Young of the Huffington Post. "Perhaps it was a White House or Pentagon-inspired leak meant as a first salvo to warn Canada to keep Universal Healthcare north of the border," Young cracks.
But there are Canadian invasion plans, although they're a bit moldy, having been conceived in 1935. Goldberg links to a newspaper account of them here; the invasion plan itself can be found here. Read more about Iran war planning.
Easter Bunny controversy: About 100 gay and lesbian families attended the annual White House Easter egg roll Monday, seeking to show that they should be welcome. The Family Pride Coalition was behind the showing, which drew the ire of some conservatives for politicizing a family event.
Several couples reportedly said they encountered no interference once they obtained tickets. But some bloggers wrote about reports that the admittance procedure was curiously altered, causing those who camped out longest for ticketsincluding some of the gay couplesto be admitted later, after First Lady Laura Bush had left.
"Nice move, Bush Admin, to deep-six the visibility of the LGBT families," writes Pam's House Blend, an LGBT blog.
But Discarded Lies doesn't see what the big deal is: "Since there were no invitations given to anyone, since the Bushes have made it known that they will not stop gay parents from attending, and since tickets are open to anyone willing to stand in line, how are gay parents 'crashing' this party?"
Read more about the Easter egg roll.
Darren Everson is a sportswriter in New York City.
Today's Papers
Breast Defense
By Eric Umansky
Posted Tuesday, April 18, 2006, at 3:15 AM ET
The New York Times leads with yesterday's bombing at a Tel Aviv falafel restaurant that killed nine, wounded 60, and was met with approval by Hamas. The Washington Post and USA Today lead with a government study concluding that an osteoporosis drug appears to reduce the risk of breast cancer as much as the one drug already approved for that and does so with fewer side-effects. But while the results look good, it's not a slam dunk. For example, women who took the drug, raloxifene, actually had a higher risk of pre-cancerous tumors. "The outcome of the study is not as clear-cut as we might have hoped for," said one analyst.
The Los Angeles Times leads with oil hitting just above $70 a barrel, about 60 cents more than the (non-inflation-adjusted) record set just after Katrina. The Wall Street Journal has a more sophisticated Page One oil piece, noting that prices are being puffed by speculation. Oil inventories in the U.S. are at their highest levels in eight years. "More and more people are going to recognize that the fundamentals just aren't there to support these prices," said one industry watcher.
"The Israeli occupation bears the responsibility for this attack," said a Hamas spokesman of the Tel Aviv explosion. Responsibility for the bombing was claimed by Islamic Jihad, which operates independently of Hamas.
Most of the papers play up Hamas' response. But the LAT takes a pause from the taunting talk and notices that Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeha Hamas man and known as a relative moderate"was silent" about the attack. The paper suggests it's the latest evidence of a "growing split" in Hamas. "On the one hand they want to govern, and on the other hand they cannot abandon the ideology of terror, or they risk losing the support of the street and outside support," said one Israeli analyst. "At some point they have to make a decision, but I don't know if they have a leader strong enough to do that."
Everybody mentionsand only the NYT frontsnewbie White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten's very public staff meeting yesterday where he announced it's time to (nudge nudge) "refresh and re-energize" things. At a press conference later, White House spokesman Scott McClellan brought up the meeting, unprompted.
The NYT's Iraq round-up says U.S. and Iraqi troops "sealed off" (whatever that means) one of Baghdad's Sunni neighborhoods. The move came after a murky gun battle that, according to one resident, involved police commandosthe kind often made up of Shiite militia and associated with death squads.
The Post's off-lead points out that Mississippi's two senatorsTrent Lott and Thad Cochranhave stuffed $700 million into a war-spending bill in order to relocate a rail line that was destroyed by Katrina. The only catch: The rail line has already been rebuilt, at a cost of $250 million.
The NYT off-leads a study concluding that families, and in particular kids, displaced by Katrina have worse health and less access to insurance than they did before the storm. One thing: The study was sponsored by the Children's Health Fund, whichthough Times doesn't say it until well after the foldis an advocacy group that pushes for more health-care coverage for kids.
The WP alone fronts the Pulitzers. Coincidentally, the WP won the most of them: four, including one for its coverage of the CIA secret prisons and one for uncovering Jack Abramoff's work habits. The NYT won for its scoop on warrantless spying and for Nicholas Kristof's Darfur writing. And the New Orleans' Times-Picayune and the Sun Herald of Gulfport, Miss., won, deservedly, for their Katrina coverage.
The nuclear option ...
Yesterday's LAT noticed that a principal at an elementary school in Inglewood was so worried her students might attend pro-immigration rallies that she barred some from even going to the bathroom, forcing them to use buckets in class.
Now the odd part: The school district defended the principal. They explained that the super-lockdown, bucket routine is indeed allowed, albeit only in a slightly more extreme scenario, namely nuclear Armageddon. "When there's a nuclear attack, that's when buckets are used," said a district official. "She made a decision to follow the handbook. She just misread it."
Eric Umansky (www.ericumansky.com) writes "Today's Papers" for Slate. He can be reached at todayspapers@slate.com.
Bombing in Israel
Raanan Cohen/Associated Press
It was the first suicide attack in Israel since the Hamas militant group took over the Palestinian government 2 1/2 weeks ago
18, 2006
Suicide Bombing in Israel Kills 9; Hamas Approves
By GREG MYRE and DINA KRAFT
TEL AVIV, April 17 A Palestinian suicide bomber carried out the deadliest attack on Israel in almost two years on Monday when he detonated his explosives at a falafel restaurant in Tel Aviv an act that Hamas, which leads the new Palestinian government, called legitimate.
Nine people and the bomber were killed and dozens wounded in the blast, at a small restaurant that was hit by a suicide bomber just three months ago, on Jan. 19. In that attack, 20 Israelis were injured.
Though the bombing was carried out by Islamic Jihad, a particularly radical faction that is not part of the government, spokesmen for Hamas and the Palestinian Interior Ministry said the blast was a legitimate response to what they called Israeli aggression.
Similarly, Islamic Jihad released a video in which Sami Hammad, 21, from outside Jenin, on the West Bank, said his bombing was dedicated to the thousands of Palestinians jailed by Israel. "There will be more such operations," he said.
Even so, the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, condemned the attack, reflecting a split in the Palestinian leadership.
Israel said it held the Hamas-led government ultimately responsible. "They are responsible because their leaders are encouraging these attacks," said Gideon Meir, a senior official at the Israeli Foreign Ministry. "It doesn't matter which group did this; it all comes from the same school of terrorism."
Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, urged the Palestinian Authority to condemn the attack, while the White House reiterated that it would have "no contact" with "a Palestinian government that encourages or tolerates terrorism."
Israel did not say how it would respond. But near midnight, Israeli aircraft fired missiles at a metal workshop in Gaza City, causing damage but no injuries. The military said the shop was used to manufacture rockets that are fired at Israel.
The bombing is also likely to intensify the almost daily exchange of fire between Israeli forces and Palestinian militants.
The explosion ripped through the restaurant just hours before Israel's new Parliament was sworn in, and Ehud Olmert, prime minister-designate, told the legislators meeting in Jerusalem, "We had hoped to celebrate the Israeli democracy today in a different atmosphere, and now we are again forced to cope with murderous terror."
At the restaurant, tiles and wires dangled from the ceiling. The street was covered with shards of glass. Blood pooled on the sidewalk and speckled the sides of parked cars.
About 60 people were wounded, including two cousins, David Manshirov, 17, and Jahoun Ismilov, 17, who worked in the kitchen and were also hurt in the January bombing.
Mr. Manshirov said his family, which emigrated three years ago from Georgia, the former Soviet republic, was poor, so he had no choice but to keep working at the restaurant.
The restaurant is on a busy corner in a gritty section of Tel Aviv where many foreign workers now live. It is considered easier for a bomber to blend in with the crowd in this neighborhood than in other parts of the city. The street where the bombing took place, Neve Shaanan, has been hit by six suicide bombings in the past four years.
The restaurant called The Mayor's Falafel had placed a security guard at its entrance after the January attack. According to witnesses, the guard stopped the bomber on Monday and asked to see his bag. At that moment, the bomber detonated his explosives, the witnesses said. The guard was believed to be among those killed.
Islamic Jihad, which has rejected an informal truce observed by some Palestinian groups, has carried out eight of the nine Palestinian suicide bombings since the beginning of 2005.
Abu Ahmed, an Islamic Jihad spokesman, called the bombing "part of the national resistance against the Israeli crimes."
The blast was the deadliest in Israel since a double suicide bombing on Aug. 31, 2004. That explosion killed 16 people in Beersheba, in the south.
The Palestinian response to the latest bombing once again underscored the tension between Mr. Abbas, who opposes such attacks and seeks negotiations with Israel, and Hamas, which now controls the cabinet and the legislature, and has carried out the largest number of suicide bombings against Israel and rejects negotiations.
Hamas took control of the Palestinian Authority government last month after winning elections in January, and has largely abided by an informal truce for more than a year. But the group says it will not lay down its weapons and has not called on other factions to stop attacks.
Asked about the bombing, a Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, said, "The resistance is a legal and natural reaction to the Israeli crimes, and the Palestinian people have the right to defend themselves."
But Mr. Abbas said, "These kinds of attacks harm the Palestinian interest, and we as an authority and government must move to stop it."
The Palestinian ministries, controlled by Hamas, issued no such denunciations.
The new Palestinian government has been in office less than three weeks, but it faces urgent problems. The United States and the European Union regard Hamas as a terrorist group and are refusing to deal with any of its members, inside or outside the government.
The new Palestinian government is also struggling with a major financial crisis, which has been made worse by this isolation, and has been unable to pay last month's wages to its 140,000 employees.
The bombing brought a new round of Western criticism directed at Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.
"The burden of responsibility for preventing terrorist attacks such as this one rests with the Palestinian Authority," said the White House spokesman, Scott McClellan. "We have noted reactions by several Palestinian terrorist groups, including Hamas, that defend or even applaud the barbaric act of terror committed in Tel Aviv today, as we have noted President Abbas's quick denunciation of it."
The Israeli security forces have barred Palestinians from entering Israel since March 11, according to the military. But Palestinian bombers have managed to slip into Israel despite such bans in the past and have frequently struck during holiday periods.
In northern Gaza, a 19-year-old Palestinian, Mamdouh Obeid, was killed Monday by an Israeli artillery shell, according to Palestinian medical workers, who said two other young men were wounded.
Qatar Funds for Palestinians
By The New York Times
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates, April 17 Qatar pledged $50 million in aid to the Hamas-led Palestinian government on Monday, a day after Iran promised the same, a campaign by Palestinian officials to make up for the shortfall caused when the United States and the European Union suspended financial aid.
Arab governments have failed to meet earlier commitments.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company -
A Tree-Hugger Ahead of His Time
Victoria and Albert Museum
The tension between ancient and modern is captured in Samuel Palmer's "In a Shoreham Garden."
March 17, 2006
Art Review | Samuel Palmer
A Tree-Hugger Ahead of His Time
THE eccentric English artist Samuel Palmer may be something of a one-hit wonder. In 1825, at age 20, he made a series of small, dark landscapes of brown ink, sepia and gum arabic on paper, enumerating the natural world with such fervent meticulousness that the images transcend reality and stop just short of freaky.
They were made the year after Palmer, a precocious artist who began exhibiting and selling his work at 14, met the visionary William Blake. He was taken to visit Blake, then in the final destitute years of his life, by John Linnell, an artist who was first Palmer's mentor (encouraging him to study Drer, for example) and later his father-in-law. Despite his situation, Blake's faith in the power of the individual imagination was undaunted. The encounter affirmed Palmer's desire to make his love of nature and literature the center of his art, and also encouraged him to see beauty as dependent on what he liked to call strangeness.
Palmer called these small landscapes his " blacks," but they are more generally known as the Oxford sepias, partly because the six in this exhibition are owned by the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford University. However you identify them, they form the heart of "Samuel Palmer (1805-1881): Vision and Landscape," a revelatory retrospective at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The first big Palmer show in nearly 80 years, it is a collaboration between the British Museum and the Met, and has been organized by a team led by William Vaughan, a longtime scholar of Romanticism. That nothing in this show is quite as great as the sepias can be counted as a failing or taken as a vivid lesson in the power of one-hit wonders, and the sometime modesty of greatness. All you need to do is make history turn on a dime once, however quietly.
Palmer's sepias take us deep into the mysterious harmony of the natural world. Animals and humans are often present note the hyperalert rabbit and half-hidden villagers in the resplendent "Early Morning" and houses and barns crop up in the distance. But the main character is nature, in its wholeness and divineness, measured out in slightly stiff renderings of effulgently leafy bushes, glimmering birches, massive oaks and gnarly rocks, and in occasional moments of breathtaking ambiguity. In "Late Twilight," a crescent moon overlooks a dark farm while floating on a horizon of glowing white that probably denotes clouds, but also reads as a vast beneficent sea separating heaven and earth.
Palmer is the least known, and most idiosyncratic, of the great Romantic landscape painters who flourished in Britain in the first half of the 19th century. Turner and Constable, for example, hold steady in our field of art historical vision partly because of the scale of their work, the freedom of their paint handling and their sustained, ever-strengthening consistency.
But Palmer avoided all of the above, and has often been characterized as an illustrator. He favored paper over canvas, rarely made work that exceeded the size of an open book and used oil paint infrequently. (You have to get close to his surfaces to realize how profligate and inventive he was with materials. Like Blake, he concocted strange alchemical mixtures. Only 9 of the 100 Palmers in this show use oil paint; only 2 use it without adding tempera, chalk or ink.)
In addition, financial necessity reinforced by Linnell, who became quite domineering after Palmer married his eldest daughter, Hannah, in 1837 dictated a long, quiet, rather academic patch in the middle of Palmer's career. His capably realistic renderings of waterfalls, golden views of Rome and Technicolor idols inspired by Virgil and Milton made him a typical Victorian painter. (In contrast, Palmer's early realism can be mesmerizing. Works like "Oak Trees, Lullingstone Park" (1828) and "A Barn With a Mossy Roof" (1828-9) more or less obviate the work of Andrew Wyeth.)
Palmer was embraced by artists who fell outside the accepted boundaries of the epic and linear course of modernism. The Pre-Raphaelites claimed him as a precursor in the 1870's. In the late-1920's, the English neo-Romantics, led by Graham Sutherland, discovered the impressive etchings he made late in life and developed a dark illustration print style in homage. There was renewed attention in the late 1940's: Palmer is frequently cited as a precedent for the English eccentrics like Stanley Spencer and the young Lucian Freud. Another span of neglect began in the 1970's, when art historians frequently dismissed English landscape paintings for ignoring the evils brought on by the Industrial Revolution and its agrarian side effects for example the mechanization of harvesting.
Palmer was a High Tory appalled by the blight of industrialization. But his cure was to look to what he saw as the good old days and, in his art, return to a time when man and nature were one. He even formed a short-lived artist's group, the Ancients, dedicated to this task, partly through the study of Gothic art. (Its outstanding members included George Richmond and Edward Calvert, both represented in this exhibition.)
Tension between the ancient and the modern is often palpable in Palmer's work. With "In a Shoreham Garden" (about 1829), Palmer translates his vision of darkness into vivid color through a large, beautifully spongy tree. It might almost be made of cotton balls and is startlingly ahead of its time, evoking the visionary art of Charles Burchfield, working in the United States a century later. But framed in the distance beyond the tree is a woman in a long red gown and a headdress who could be a Renaissance princess.
The same divide exists in his radiant mixed-media paintings, which even at their best seem slightly archaic. In "The Bright Cloud," with its towering cumulus formation and golden fields, contented peasants move about with a dignity that hints at the pageantry of Renaissance frescoes. The landscape also suggests a Bruegel in miniature.
Palmer recaptured some of the force of the sepias only toward the end of his life, when financial security enabled the visionary side of his sensibility to reassert itself. He took up etching, and in works like "The Bellman" (1879) and "Opening the Fold" (or "Early Morning") (1880), he summoned a softer, matte version of the gleaming darkness of the Oxford sepias.
But only the sepias provide an exciting artistic promontory from which you can catch past and future seemingly flowing together. Look back and you see the light-drenched landscapes of Lorrain and the more architectonic neo-Classical terrains of Poussin, although Palmer's originality may rest on the way he seems to have assimilated the pictorial crafts of Gothic art cloisonn and stained glass. Look forward and Palmer's sepias seem like the beginning of a line of exaggerated visionary landscape painting that forms the non-Cubist, more representational side of modernism. It includes van Gogh, Gauguin, Munch and the Fauves, as well as Albert Pinkham Ryder, Louis Eilshemius, Marsden Hartley and Burchfield.
The sepias' insistent textures and radiant demarcations of light and dark have a textlike vividness. Like manuscript illuminations that have absorbed their narratives, they illustrate something profound, even if we don't know the story. Every mark on the paper seems to convey meaning like the individual letters and words on a printed page and each one cooperates to form a larger message: ecstasy. Today, Palmer would probably qualify as a tree-hugger, but openness to his greatest work might also make the nonhuggers among us see the essential bond between human destiny and nature's well-being.
Before You Hit Send, Pause, Reflect
GOING PUBLIC John Green of ABC News was suspended after e-mail messages commenting on President Bush's debate performance and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright were released.
April 9, 2006
Ideas & Trends
Before You Hit Send, Pause, Reflect
By LORNE MANLY
MODERN-DAY, corporate newsrooms may be far more sanitary than their ribald, cigarette-smoke-clouded counterparts of the "His Girl Friday" era. Yet their freewheeling nature has not been completely extinguished, with the banter and off-color humor about the day's events and personalities ricocheting among today's cubicle dwellers, at times through news organizations' e-mail systems.
But as John Green, executive producer of the weekend edition of ABC's "Good Morning America," recently discovered, that more indelible form of communication can wreak havoc on one's journalism career. ABC has suspended him for a month for leaked e-mail messages that were critical of President Bush and Madeleine K. Albright, the former secretary of state.
The punishment has sparked a discussion within media circles about the proper limits of newsroom repartee and the meaning of objectivity in a polarized and electronically connected environment. Although Mr. Green's private riffs were bipartisan in nature and do not appear to have leeched into news coverage, they come at a time when the mainstream media whipsawed by a smattering of high-profile misdeeds and an aggressive gotcha police among bloggers and advocacy groups are striving mightily to appear impartial above all.
Authenticated e-mail messages, as in Mr. Green's case, muddy that image of journalistic probity in ways that similarly casual spoken conversations do not. As a result, some news executives and media observers reluctantly agree with ABC's action, arguing that journalists must avoid any appearances of being emotionally or ideologically involved with the subjects of their reporting.
Others wonder what exactly Mr. Green did wrong, other than embarrass some executives. The punishment, they worry, is disproportionate to the offense. News organizations, more than any other segment in society, they argue, should be wary about inhibiting the speech of their employees. The resulting second guessing, the screening of one's jokes, jibes and commentary, could have a chilling effect, they say.
"Journalists should be able to speak openly in the vernacular, casually and jokingly, and without evil consequences," said David Korzenik, a media lawyer in New York who is an adjunct professor at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
Mr. Green's troubles began last month, when the Drudge Report Web site published an 18-month-old message that expressed frustration with Mr. Bush's tactics in his first debate with Senator John F. Kerry. "Are you watching this?" he wrote one colleague. "Bush makes me sick. If he uses the 'mixed messages' line one more time, I'm going to puke."
Days later, a second e-mail message surfaced, this time in The New York Post. In that e-mail message, from April 2005, Mr. Green wrote that Ms. Albright who only acknowledged that she was Jewish after being shown information by a reporter in 1997 had "Jew shame." He then added that Ms. Albright hated "Good Morning America" because she believed she did not get the promised allotment of time on a previous appearance. "I do not like her," he wrote.
The next day, on March 31, ABC suspended him for a month. Jeffrey Schneider, vice president of ABC News, said that the network would not discuss details of the punishment because it was a personnel matter. "It isn't simply an issue of expressing one's opinion," he said. "It's also the vituperative nature of those comments."
No one advocating for more journalistic self-control is particularly happy about the need for it. "I know it's not much fun, but I think it's the proper mode of conduct," said Bill Marimow, vice president of news at National Public Radio.
"Any beat reporter who in private ridicules, demeans or assails their character, intellect or ability raises questions in the minds of a lot of people that they can be impartial," he added.
E-mail messages complicate the issue, offering definitive proof of a journalist's thinking. "When you have the premeditation of putting it in writing, it makes it different than a comment in a production meeting," said John Stack, vice president of news gathering at the Fox News Channel.
That logic, however, bewilders some other journalists. "What did this guy do wrong?" asked Michael Kinsley, a columnist for Slate and The Washington Post who in a recent column argued that the concept of objectivity is so muddled as to be useless. "Was it having these views, or merely expressing them? Expecting journalists not to develop opinions, strong opinions even, goes against human nature and the particular nature of journalists."
"I guess there are limits if a guy's e-mail showed him to be a Nazi, you might not want him as a network TV producer," he added. "But unless the views themselves are beyond the pale and millions of Americans hold views like those this guy expressed expressing those views shouldn't be beyond the pale either."
William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, said he was troubled by the blurring of the public and the private. "For me, I think people should be held accountable for what they put on the air or in print," he said. And there is no proof this expression of private views affected news coverage, he said.
Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said that while he found Mr. Green's quip about Ms. Albright to be offensive, he worries that curbs on newsroom banter is just asking people to be hypocrites.
"Just because they are journalists doesn't mean they give up their rights to say things that are smart or stupid," he said.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
Vegas Grannies
Read more: Las Vegas, metropolis
Vegas Grannies
Next to slot machines, the most common object in Las Vegas is the grannie. In every hotel, casino, restaurant, and show, you are likely to find several and possibly a great many Vegas grannies. Its not surprising really, as Vegas and environs remain popular as retirement locales, and of course every travel agency loves to bring in planeloads of the aged (the AARP even partners with Travelocity in this lucrative niche market). Dont get me wrong, I have nothing against my elders. But its strange to me how these grannies really are everywhere. Theyre the first to appear on casino mornings, taking over from bleary-eyed late-night gamblers around 7 a.m. There was a whole clutch of them this morning in Hooters of all places, happily slapping buttons on Star Wars slot machines. But even odder is how the grannies end up in the audience at virtually every show Ive ever attended in Vegas, no matter how raunchy. The only exception and even this is only occasionally are the late-night shows starting after 10 p.m. But Ive seen grannies at ultra-profane comedy acts and the most idiotic and tawdry topless shows. Going to a show in Vegas is such an automatic reflex for some people that theyll see anything, even if (and perhaps especially if) its something theyd never dream of seeing at home. And no matter how pornographic the show or how loud the hip-hop, the grannies just shrug and move on to the next one. Sin City seems to put some life in them old bones; last night as I walked past a pair of grannies energetically working a pair fairyland-themed video poker machines at the Riviera, one pointed at a dancing sprite on the screen and chirped, OOOH, I love it when the elves come up. Her friend agreed, cooing, Theyre soooo sexy!
Let it Ride in Las Vegas [Travelocity/AARp]
[Photo: Getty Images]
Previously: $3 Blackjack at the Sahara, Forbess Best of Vegas, Afternoon Bar Dance, Splash at the Riviera, The Wynn Buffet
Be Merry, Not Ancient
Illustration by Ji Lee and photography by Daniel Root
April 9, 2006
Critic's Notebook
Be Merry, Not Ancient
By FRANK BRUNI
BECAUSE we all needed yet another set of rules to follow, because we had not yet been sufficiently bombarded with dictates about the colors of the fruits and vegetables we should eat and the ideal intake of alcohol and the optimal frequency of low-impact exercise, the Journal of the American Medical Association came along last week to tell us that serious calorie restriction might best serve the quest for a long, disease-free life.
The number of calories in the daily diets of some participants in this latest study was gulp 890. Which, by my nonscientific research, is less than the average teenage or adult American who lives within a half mile of a Burger King and has not had gastric bypass surgery consumes for dinner. That might be considered a helpful target, except that it's so ludicrously unattainable, in professions other than modeling and zip codes other than 90210, that there isn't anything helpful about it.
It's also hard to see the point of it. If living to 99 means forever cutting the porterhouse into eighths, swearing off the baked potato and putting the martini shaker into storage, then 85 sounds a whole lot better, and I'd ratchet that down to 79 to hold onto the Hagen-Dazs, along with a few shreds of spontaneity. It's a matter of priorities.
Do we really want as many years as we can get, no matter how we get them? At what point does the pursuit of an extended life a pursuit that pivots on the debatable assumption that habit can outwit heredity, not to mention chance become the entire business of a life? Is longevity all it's cracked up to be?
Scientists and medical doctors are certainly obsessed with it, charting a tedious path of pleasures assiduously portioned and rituals steadfastly maintained. Cut back on caffeine. Stop after a glass and a half of red wine. Make an enemy of red meat. Make friends with flossing which, it turns out, may have benefits that go beyond admirable dental hygiene to the prevention of heart disease and diabetes.
Month after month brings study after study, and the only thing more addling than keeping track of all the information is resolving the contradictions it seems to contain.
Take the matter of weight. If memory serves me (it may not, given my failure to toe the line on wine) and a Nexis search isn't failing me, we received a different set of instructions just a year ago.
Last April, a study also published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, more commonly known as the Journal of Utterly Mixed Signals, demonstrated a correlation between being very thin and an increased risk of death. The study indicated that people who are overweight but not obese might be better off, at least in terms of attaining the coveted status and Pensacola retirement home of the nonagenarian.
I'm no expert on metabolism, but I bet that the 890-calorie-a-day diet followed by some participants in the new study would lead, over time, to a condition that looks an awful lot like extreme thinness. So what should I have for breakfast? A cup of low-fat yogurt or a salt bagel with a schmear?
Yes, I'm painting with a broad brush; the studies in question are more nuanced and less definitive than I'm making them out to be. The cap of 890 calories a day was a short-term fix, not a long-term prison. There might be allowances, down the road, for a Whopper with cheese. Followed, of course, by some vigorous flossing and a brisk 40-minute walk.
But the larger point remains. We are awash in behavioral strictures, many of them conflicting.
After years of being schooled in the transcendent virtues of low-fat diets, we were informed two months ago in, you guessed it, the Journal of the American Medical Association that this education might be flawed. An eight-year, $415 million federal study of nearly 49,000 women found that those who maintained low-fat diets had the same rates of breast cancer, colon cancer and heart attacks as those who ate what they wanted.
So, I'll have that bagel with a schmear, but not simply because one study among many gave me a green light, at least for the moment. I'll have it because it makes me happy, which has to count for something.
And even if the new study is wrong and the old studies were right and the schmear robs me of some time on the tail end of my days, I may not have enough money in my 401(k) to go the full distance, and I'm definitely not counting on Social Security to pick up the slack.
Which raises additional concerns. What happens to all of us, as a society, if 100 becomes the new 80? Plastic surgeons may get even richer and the populations of Florida and Arizona may swell, but will pension funds still be there for us? Will prescription drug benefits?
Each of us can individually hunker down for the long haul, squirreling away our money instead of spending it on hedonistic vacations, exercising faithfully so that our limbs stay as limber as our nipped-and-tucked faces are taut. But doesn't the quality of our days matter as much as the quantity of them?
Pondering this question, I riffled through some obituaries.
Richard Burton died at 58 no doubt fewer years than he or anyone else would want but wasn't his a swashbuckling, gallivanting life that was in many ways worth envying, Liz or no Liz?
Strom Thurmond died at 100. "In those last years," according to the obituary by Adam Clymer in The New York Times, "he had to be helped onto the Senate floor by aides, who also told him, in voices audible in the Senate gallery, how to vote."
Of course neither man planned it that way, and that may be the most important lesson of all.
We can't really predict tomorrow. We can't guarantee its arrival with a specified number of calories or a given allotment of sleep, with milligrams of dark chocolate or ounces of fiber. But we can often determine the measure of joy we wring out of today.
I also riffled through a book of quotations and immediately found this proverb: "He lives long who lives well." I don't think those last two words are really about blueberries, broccoli and green tea. And I'm not sure the first three are about anything as literal and prosaic as a tally of years.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
Michael Jackson Bailout Said to Be Close
Mark J. Terrill/Associated Press
The entrance to pop star Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch home, Dec. 17, 2004, in Santa Ynez, Calif.
April 13, 2006
Michael Jackson Bailout Said to Be Close
By JEFF LEEDS and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
Michael Jackson, the onetime pop-music king who has endured a lengthy slide toward insolvency, is close to a deal that would keep him from bankruptcy by refinancing hundreds of millions of dollars in loans, people briefed on the plan said last night.
As part of the transaction, he will also agree at some point in the future to give up a part of a prized asset a song catalog that includes Beatles' hits to the Sony Corporation, people briefed on the plan said.
Mr. Jackson, who spent years racking up debt to underwrite his lifestyle even as his music career faded, has appeared to teeter on the brink of ruin several times in recent years. Last month, he all but closed his sprawling California ranch called Neverland, a move that came after the California authorities threatened to sue over unpaid wages to ranch employees.
Mr. Jackson used his stake in the song catalog as part of the collateral for about $270 million in loans from Bank of America. The bank sold the loans last year to Fortress Investment Group, a New York-based investment company that buys distressed debt. The entire catalog, of which Mr. Jackson owns 50 percent, has been valued around $1 billion, the people briefed said.
As part of the new agreement, Fortress has agreed to provide a new $300 million loan and reduce the interest payments Mr. Jackson must make.
Under the deal he has been negotiating, Mr. Jackson would agree to provide Sony which is co-owner of the Sony/ATV Music catalog with him with an option to buy half his stake, or about 25 percent of the catalog, at a set price, according to the people briefed on the deal.
Should Sony execute its option on the music catalog, it would ensure that Mr. Jackson was able to pay his debts, these people said.
Executives involved in the deal cautioned last night that some details had yet to completed and that the agreement could still collapse.
Representatives for Sony and Fortress declined to comment last night. A representative for Mr. Jackson did not return a call.
But executives involved in the deal said it came after months of talks that spanned the globe, with meetings from Los Angeles to New York to London to Bahrain, where Mr. Jackson has been living at the hospitality of Sheik Abdullah, the ruler's son.
The deal also comes after years of efforts by an eclectic parade of financial advisers including the California billionaire Ronald W. Burkle and the Florida entrepreneur Alvin Malnik to offer Mr. Jackson guidance for extricating himself from his woes. Mr. Jackson's financial managers had been pressing him to shed a part of his stake in the Sony/ATV venture since before he stood trial last year on charges of child molestation. He was acquitted last summer.
Many people close to Mr. Jackson have maintained that he could raise money to repay his loans or at least stay afloat by touring internationally or working out a series of television and book deals. But the consensus among his advisers was that he would face bankruptcy if he did not refinance.
Sony has a longstanding interest in keeping Mr. Jackson solvent. If Fortress had moved to foreclose on Mr. Jackson, he might have been forced into bankruptcy protection, where his stake in the publishing company could be put up for auction.
In negotiating the deal, Sony seeks to avoid the prospect that another bidder could gain ownership of the stake, which the company has long hoped to control.
Sony has been trying to organize financial partners that could prop up Mr. Jackson's wobbly finances. In the fall, a Sony representative flew to Dubai to meet with Mr. Jackson and an adviser, Gaynell Lenoir, daughter of the late Gerald Lenoir, a lawyer who was a mentor to the lawyer Johnnie Cochran.
Originally, they had tried to hammer out a deal in which Citigroup would acquire the loans, and offer Mr. Jackson a more favorable interest rate, around 6 percent, these executives said. Mr. Jackson had been paying more than 20 percent in monthly interest payments.
Rather than sell the loans to Citigroup, Fortress agreed to match the bank's terms, the executives said.
The various parties had agreed to the deal in principle a few weeks ago, the executives said, but the final pact was held up while the companies involved tried to address questions about potential exposure linked to Mr. Jackson's remaining legal problems.
Prescient Capital, a New Jersey company that said it helped Mr. Jackson secure the original financing from Fortress, has sued him for breach of contract, accusing him of failing to pay millions of dollars in fees for providing financial advice.
As a result, Mr. Jackson has finally been forced to loosen his grip on one of the richest of song catalogs.
He paid $47.5 million in 1985 to acquire the ATV catalog, which had roughly 4,000 songs among them more than 200 tunes written by members of the Beatles. After 10 months of negotiations with ATV's owner, the Australian tycoon Robert Holmes Court, Mr. Jackson bested other suitors including the music executives Charles Koppelman and Martin Bandier, the London-based Virgin Records and the real estate entrepreneur Samuel J. Lefrak.
In 1995, as he confronted early financial woes, Mr. Jackson struck a deal to merge ATV with Sony's publishing arm. The arrangement also provided Mr. Jackson with a stake in new songs acquired by the venture, like "No Such Thing" by John Mayer.
Aside from the Beatles songs, the venture has a vast archive including "Blowin' in the Wind" by Bob Dylan, "Sweet Caroline" by Neil Diamond and "E-Pro" by Beck
The catalog also includes the works of songwriters including Stevie Nicks, Sarah McLachlan, Destiny's Child, Garth Brooks and Richie Sambora of Bon Jovi. The venture is also a big force in country music, having acquired the catalog of Roy Acuff and Fred Rose for $157 million in 2002. An archive of songs from the likes of Hank Williams and Roy Orbison is also included.
-
Final Struggles on 9/11 Plane Fill Courtroom
Federal District Court, via Associated Press
The cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93, recovered from the wreckage.
April 13, 2006
Final Struggles on 9/11 Plane Fill Courtroom
By NEIL A. LEWIS
ALEXANDRIA, Va., April 12 The recorded sounds of struggle and panic on United Airlines Flight 93 filled a federal courtroom here today as jurors in the sentencing trial of Zacarias Moussaoui listened raptly to the Sept. 11 hijackers seizing control of the cockpit and passengers trying to retake control, believing it was their only chance to avoid death.
Long silences in the 31-minute recording were punctuated by the cries of the hijackers at the controls, the passengers who were trying desperately to break down the cockpit door and the crashing of objects around the cabin.
There are also the sounds of what may have been the killing of a flight attendant as the hijackers took control: a woman in the cockpit moaning, "Please, please, don't hurt me." Her voice soon appears again for the last time as she is heard to say, "I don't want to die, I don't want to die" followed by one of the hijackers saying in Arabic: "Everything is fine. I finished."
The recording ends with a three-minute crescendo of noise as a passenger apparently just outside the door shouts: "In the cockpit! If we don't, we'll die!"
On the other side of the door, two hijackers are heard deliberating before deciding to end the flight to avoid being overcome.
"Is that it? I mean, shall we pull it down?" one asks in Arabic and the reply is, "Yes, put it in it and pull it down." They then both scream repeatedly "Allah is the greatest" in Arabic as the planes goes down at 10:03 a.m. into a field in Shanksville, Pa., at more than 500 miles an hour. Aboard were 33 passengers, 5 flight attendants, 2 pilots and the 4 hijackers.
It was the first time the recording, made by cockpit instruments and recovered from the wreckage, had been played in public. And it may be the last, under the trial judge's order allowing it to be heard by jurors deciding whether to order that Mr. Moussaoui be put to death.
Mr. Moussaoui, who was in jail in Minnesota at the time of the attacks, smiled broadly at times during the playing of the recording, once when a hijacker in the cockpit said in Arabic: "In the name of Allah. I bear witness that there is no other God but Allah." Mr. Moussaoui has mostly evinced an air of indifference during the trial. A 37-year-old Frenchman of Moroccan heritage, he is the only person to stand trial in the United States in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks. The jury has already unanimously ruled that he is eligible for the death penalty, finding him responsible for at least some of the deaths that day because he had lied to interrogators at the time of his arrest about his knowledge of plans by Al Qaeda to fly planes into buildings.
Judge Leonie M. Brinkema ruled that the digital recording should not be publicly released, saying that otherwise it would be broadcast repeatedly, something family members of those killed have objected to. Judge Brinkema allowed the release of a nine-page transcript, the first complete account of the recording's contents.
The recording has been heard by some family members as well as by the national commission that issued a report on the attacks and concluded that the hijackers had intended to crash the plane into the Capitol or the White House but were "defeated by the alerted, unarmed passengers of United 93."
Although the general story of Flight 93 based on such official investigations has been known for some time, listening to the audio seemed nonetheless a harrowing experience for the jurors. In this second phase of their sentencing deliberations, they are supposed to weigh the heinousness of the crime against any mitigating factors and then decide whether Mr. Moussaoui should be executed or spend the remainder of his life in prison.
After the recording, the prosecution presented two final witnesses before resting its case. One was Lorne Lyles, the husband of CeeCee Lyles, a flight attendant on Flight 93. Mr. Lyles testified about their last conversation, in which she used an airphone to proclaim her love and ask him to look after their children.
The court-appointed defense lawyers, with whom Mr. Moussaoui does not speak, are supposed to begin their effort to save him on Thursday. They are expected to offer two principal arguments: that although he was a Qaeda member, even the leaders of the organization regarded him as unreliable and had not planned on using him as part of the Sept. 11 plot; and that he has exaggerated his role in a bid for martyrdom.
Mr. Moussaoui is expected to take the stand again as he did in the first phase, in which he seemed eager to bolster the prosecution's case.
As the jurors heard the audio, they could watch on television monitors a synchronized depiction on a map that showed the location of the plane at every moment, its air speed, altitude and attitude. The jurors could see on that video how the hijacker pilot, Ziad Jarrah, tried to foil the counterattack by suddenly rolling the airplane sharply, apparently to throw the passengers off balance.
The release of the transcript comes as Universal Studios is about to release a film about the event called "United 93," the trailer of which some moviegoers found too disturbing. The transcript may provide another template against which to measure the film's accuracy.
The recording shows that Mr. Jarrah tried to calm the passengers by pretending he was conducting a more customary hijacking in which the plane would land somewhere.
"Here's the captain," he says at 9:39:11. "I would like to tell you all to remain seated. We have a bomb aboard, and we are going back to the airport, and we have our demands. So, please remain quiet."
But passengers learned from several cellphone conversations that other planes had already crashed into the World Trade Center. It is on one of those conversations that Todd Beamer, who tells a telephone operator of the plans to overpower the hijackers, is overheard saying to fellow passengers, "Let's roll."
In addition, violence in the cabin had told the passengers that something was different than an ordinary hijacking. In evidence presented Tuesday, jurors heard the phone call of Marion Britton, a passenger, to a friend on the ground. "Don't worry," the friend consoled. "They'll probably take you to another country."
Ms. Britton replied, "Two passengers have had their throats cut."
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
Recent Comments