Month: September 2005

  • Depp Immortalized at Hollywood Theater




    AFP/File Photo:

    Johnny Depp, seen here 04 September, put his hand and footprint onto the sidewalk on…

    Depp Immortalized at Hollywood Theater By The Associated Press

    Sat Sep 17, 3:25 PM ET

    The hands that were replaced with cutlery in “Edward Scissorhands” and wore gloves in “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” are now immortalized in concrete.

    Johnny Depp signed his name and placed his handprints and footprints in wet concrete in front of the Grauman’s Chinese Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard.

    “So this is weird,” Deep said as hundreds of fans watched the ceremony Friday. “I mean, to say that this is overwhelming is probably the understatement of the millennium.”

    The sidewalk honor coincided with the release of Depp’s latest film, the animated “Corpse Bride,” which opened in limited release Friday. The movie expands to wide release next weekend.

    It was his fifth collaboration with director Tim Burton, who also directed “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” and “Edward Scissorhands.”

    Depp is currently filming “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” and “Pirates of the Caribbean 3.”

  •  







    ON GOLDEN PONDS




    Steve Payne for The New York Times

    ON GOLDEN PONDS For decades, Muskoka, a large lakeland area north of Toronto, has been host to celebrity industrialists and financiers. Now, it has become a playground for big names in entertainment and sports, too.


    September 16, 2005

    Muskoka: The Malibu of the North




    HERE is another reason to blame Canada. For years, movie studios have been flocking to Toronto and Montreal to make films on the cheap. But now Hollywood is outsourcing another resource to the land of maple leaves and moose: celebrity second homes.


    Just two hours north of Toronto, Muskoka is a region of lakes and jutting granite cliffs that recalls the breathtaking vistas of the Adirondacks. More recently, however, it has begun to feel more like Malibu, as film stars and the very rich erect trophy homes along its pristine shoreline.


    Never heard of Muskoka? You’re not the only one. Scott Wittman, the lyricist for the Broadway musical “Hairspray,” hadn’t either, until the comedian Martin Short invited him up this summer. “It’s a little bit of Hollywood up here,” said Mr. Wittman, a Manhattan resident, who spent a month writing and swimming at Mr. Short’s cottage on Lake Rosseau. “It’s like Golden Pond. You almost expect Katharine Hepburn to come around the corner at any moment.”


    Or at least Goldie Hawn, Kurt Russell, Tom Hanks or Steven Spielberg – all either own cottages in Muskoka or visit often.


    The celebrity appeal is not hard to appreciate. Encompassing an area about the size of Rhode Island, Muskoka is clustered around three big lakes – Muskoka, Joseph and Rosseau – that are carved into the Canadian Shield and framed by a dense canopy of hemlocks, pines and maples. With a galaxy of private islands and thousands of miles of glacial shoreline, Muskoka is “beautiful and secluded, with palatial homes for the Canadian superwealthy that fit the Hollywood model elegantly,” said Noah Cowan, co-director of the Toronto International Film Festival, which ends tomorrow. “People come to the festival, then hang out in Muskoka.”


    Hockey players (this is Canada, after all) huddle here. “Every single member of the Toronto Maple Leafs has a place in Muskoka,” Stephen Levine, 45, a Toronto accountant who owns a cottage in the area, said with slight exaggeration.


    And if this were an episode of MTV’s “Cribs,” the vehicle segment would not focus on Bentleys but on torpedo-shaped speedboats, mahogany racers and G.P.S.-guided seaplanes. “You don’t see sailboats or canoes anymore,” said Bob Topp, 71, a fourth-generation Muskokan who lives in Toronto. “The new people are anxious to show off their wealth.”


    But not all the money is new. Captains of Canadian industry like the Labatts, Bronfmans and Eatons have spent summers here since the beginning of the 20th century. They were joined by Pittsburgh barons like Mellon and Carnegie, who built huge houses along a narrow channel on Lake Muskoka known as Millionaires Row.


    The rest of Ontario’s cottage country, however, remained middle-class. Torontonians of more modest means could afford a cabin on the lake. “Blue-collar guys could put away some money and buy a small place,” said Steven Curry, a broker at ReMax Muskoka Realty.


    But in the last decade, a new generation of millionaires arrived, buoyed by a hot Toronto economy, a real estate boom and Muskoka’s newfound cachet as a retreat for the rich and famous. Small cottages were snapped up, torn down and replaced with oversize facsimiles.


    “We couldn’t afford our cottage anymore,” said Pat Sinclair, 65, a retired nurse from Toronto, who sold her place last year after the property taxes rose to about $9,500 from about $2,500 in 1990. “Everything now is high-end, high-end, high-end.”


    For anyone casually acquainted with Muskoka, what passes for a cottage these days may come as quite a shock. Take the home of Kevin and Linda O’Leary, a couple from Boston who built a cottage on Lake Joseph five years ago. Now, rising like a wedding cake from the lakeshore, is a periwinkle-blue structure with white trim, wraparound cedar decks, three boat slips and a second-floor sun deck that is larger than some marinas here.


    And that is just the boathouse.


    Behind it, perched on a huge slab of pink-and-gray granite, is the 9,000-square-foot main house with seven bedrooms, four stone fireplaces, a wine cellar carved into the native rock and a lofty sweep of terraces.


    “This is a very typical room in Muskoka,” Ms. O’Leary, 41, said during a tour of her cottage earlier this month. The room had 30-foot cathedral ceilings and a wet bar. In a restaurant-grade kitchen, a staff of three was preparing sweetbreads and lobster for 17 people, including colleagues from her husband’s former software company. “I wanted this to have a country cottage feel,” she said.


    No amount of weathered shingles or barn wood flooring however, can obscure the fact that the age of McCottages has arrived in Muskoka. “Everyone wants the Olde Muskoka look,” said Jeff Buddo, a real estate agent from Chestnut Park Real Estate. “When people say they have a ‘cottage’ these days, what they really mean is ‘mansion.’ “


    There is little confusion, however, when it comes to price. In 1993, the average price of a house on the three lakes was about $225,000, according to the Muskoka & Halliburton Association of Realtors. That figure is now nearing $1 million, with some prices exceeding $4 million.


    “All of Muskoka has become a Millionaires Row,” said Anita Latner, a real estate broker. “Muskoka is to Toronto what the Hamptons are to New York.”


    Except that in Muskoka, everyone is on sparkling blue lakes and the curb appeal is from a boat. On a windy Friday afternoon, James Crowe, 40, an heir to a tire manufacturing fortune, offered a real estate cruise aboard his 27-foot-long Sea Ray runabout. “See that boathouse?” Mr. Crowe said, pointing to a typical structure in the distance. As he got closer, the contours of a large green house came into view. “It’s owned by some American worth $700 million, and nobody here knows or cares.”


    As he sped north, the cottages grew larger, the buffer between boathouses farther and the names more familiar. There were Kenny G’s log cabin-style villa, on a private island, that Cindy Crawford rented this summer; the sprawling compound of Ted Rogers of Rogers Communications; the cliff-top cottage of Robert Lantos of Alliance Atlantis, the Canadian entertainment conglomerate; and the relatively modest getaway of Eric Lindros, the hockey star.


    “Here, at the top of Lake Joseph, it’s called Billionaires Row,” Mr. Crowe said.


    THAT’S not to suggest that Lake Rosseau, its sister lake, is shabby, especially when the neighbors include Goldie, Kurt and Martin. The less known announce their presence through architecture: The six-slip boathouse for a private regatta of antique racers and fishing boats. The two-island estate linked by a footbridge flanked by twin turrets – one with a hot tub, the other with a sauna. The water slide that is chiseled into the sloping granite.


    “My 3-and-a-half-year-old son lives on the waterslide,” said Bobby Genovese, 41, who divides his time between a place in the Bahamas and 10 other homes. His Muskoka cottage, built three years ago at the cost of about $7.5 million, might be his favorite. “Where else can you get to three of Canada’s best golf courses by boat?”


    That’s assuming, of course, you’re a member. There are now about two dozen golf courses and counting in Muskoka, including six that are private. The newest, Öviinbyrd, tries to be so exclusive that its phone number is unlisted and the entrance is unmarked. Membership, roughly $85,000, is limited to friends of the owner, Peter Schwartz, a dot-com alumnus.


    “It doesn’t matter how much money you have or how famous you are – it’s about who you know,” explained Dave Gardiner, Öviinbyrd’s general manager. “Martin Short’s wife came to play the other day, but she couldn’t because she wasn’t a member.”


    The one sport that everyone seems to share is celebrity-spotting.


    “I won’t drop names, but we get a fair amount of the movie set, like Kurt Russell, Tom Hanks and Bill Murray,” said E. J. Gordon, who has a no-autographs policy at his restaurants in Port Carling, where the three lakes meet.


    “Steven Spielberg was here a couple of weeks ago,” said a worker at the Muskoka Airport, where the Gulfstreams are parked like taxis.


    “Kate Hudson drops by,” said Ronald Brabander, who runs Blondie’s Restaurant in Gravenhurst on Lake Muskoka.


    The air of celebrity is so thick that the novelty may be wearing thin. “I’ve seen them at the grocery store, I’ve seen them at the marina, I’ve seen them playing golf,” said Bob Schultz, a Toronto investor who has been coming to Muskoka for 35 years. “Nobody pays attention to them anymore.”


    If You Go


    Muskoga is a two-hour drive from Toronto, going north along Highway 400. Rental cars can be picked up at Toronto Pearson International Airport.


    Taboo Resort, Golf and Spa (Muskoka Beach Road, Gravenhurst; www.tabooresort.com; 800-461-0236) has single rooms starting at $250 and four-bedroom cottages for $920. Cottage rentals from $800 a week to more than $3,000 are listed on Port Carling Boats (www.portcarlingboats.com). Other accommodations can be found at the Muskoka Tourism’s Web site (www.discovermuskoka.ca).

  •  







    Insurgents Strike Baghdad Again




    Agence France — Presse/Getty Images

    Residents of Baghdad’s Dora neighborhood were warned to stay indoors after two car bombs were followed by a threat that more were on the way.

    September 16, 2005
    Insurgents Strike Baghdad Again; Two-Day Death Toll Nears 200
    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 15 (AP) – Suicide bombers struck the capital again on Thursday, killing at least 31 people in two attacks about a minute apart and lifting the death toll in two days of carnage to nearly 200.

    A dozen bombings during a nine-hour spate of terror on Wednesday killed at least 167 people and wounded nearly 600 in Baghdad’s worst day of bloodshed since the United States-led invasion in March 2003.

    American officials blamed the onslaught on efforts by the Sunni Arab-dominated insurgency to answer a successful joint United States-Iraqi offensive last week in the northern city of Tal Afar and to spark sectarian strife in hopes of undermining the Oct. 15 referendum on Iraq’s proposed constitution.

    “These spikes of violence are predictable around certain critical events that highlight the progress of democracy,” said Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch, the chief American military spokesman in Iraq.

    General Lynch said the joint operation in Tal Afar killed 145 insurgents and captured 361 in the second operation in a year to rid the area of militants, including foreign fighters crossing from Syria. Now, he said, American and Iraqi forces were fighting to regain control of the Syrian border, near the western insurgent stronghold of Qaim, on the Euphrates River and well to the south of Tal Afar. “We believe that the terrorists and foreign fighters are entering Iraq across the Syrian border, down the Euphrates River Valley into Baghdad,” General Lynch said.

    The latest violence only deepened the misery in Baghdad, where streets on Thursday were noticeably quieter and, in the southern Dora district, where the latest bombings were concentrated, deserted.

    American and Iraqi soldiers using loudspeakers roamed the district, warning residents to stay indoors because five more suicide car bombers were believed to be in the area.

    [Gunmen shot dead two laborers and wounded 13 in the New Baghdad district of the Iraqi capital on Friday morning, Reuters reported. The laborers were waiting to be hired for a day's work when the gunmen opened fire, the police said.]

    Clashes were reported Thursday in Ramadi, a militant stronghold on the Euphrates west of Baghdad. A police captain, Nasir Alusi, said American and Iraqi troops in Ramadi came under mortar attack as militants roamed the streets. Shops were closed and streets empty. Gunfire echoed through the area, he said.

    The American military did not confirm the report, but General Lynch said operations were continuing in Anbar Province, where Ramadi is the capital.

    The United Nations planned to print and distribute five million copies of Iraq’s draft constitution before the Oct. 15 referendum, a spokesman said Thursday. The spokesman, Farhan Haq, said officials hoped the Iraqi Parliament would sign off on the text by Sunday. “Once the transitional National Assembly designates a final draft constitution, we stand ready to assist in printing it and distributing that draft constitution so that the Iraqi people can make an informed choice in the upcoming referendum,” Mr. Haq said.

    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company Home Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map Back to Top

  • Friday, September 16, 2005







    Neigh to Cronies




    Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times


    September 10, 2005
    Neigh to Cronies
    By MAUREEN DOWD
    WASHINGTON

    I understand that politicians are wont to put cronies and cupcakes on the payroll.

    I just wish they’d stop putting them on the Homeland Security payroll.

    Can’t they stick their pals who failed at business in the Small Business Administration and their tomatoes over at the Oilseeds and Rice Bureau of the Ag Department?

    At least Bill Clinton knew not to stash his sweeties in jobs concerned with keeping the nation safe. Gennifer Flowers said that Mr. Clinton got her a $17,500 job in Arkansas in the state unemployment agency, though she was ranked ninth out of 11 applicants tested. And Monica Lewinsky’s thong expertise led her to a job as an assistant to the Pentagon press officer.

    Gov. James McGreevey of New Jersey had to resign last year after acknowledging that he had elevated his patronage peccadillo, an Israeli poet named Golan Cipel, to be his special assistant on homeland security without even a background check or American citizenship. Mr. Cipel, however, was vastly qualified for his job compared with Michael Brown, who didn’t know the difference between a tropical depression and an anxiety attack when President Bush charged him with life-and-death decisions.

    W. trusted Brownie simply because he was a friend of a friend. He was a college buddy of Joe Allbaugh, who worked as W.’s chief of staff when he was Texas governor and as his 2000 presidential campaign manager.

    It sounds more like a Vince Vaughn-Owen Wilson flick than the story of a man who was to be responsible for the fate of the Republic during the biggest natural disaster in our history. Brownie was a failed former lawyer with a degree from a semiaccredited law school, as The New Republic put it, when he moved to Colorado in 1991 to judge horse judges for the Arabian Horse Association.

    He was put out to pasture under pressure in 2001, leaving him free to join his pal Mr. Allbaugh at an eviscerated FEMA. Mr. Allbaugh decided to leave the top job at FEMA and become a lobbyist with clients like Halliburton when the agency was reorganized under Homeland Security, stripping it of authority. Why not, Mr. Allbaugh thought, just pass this obscure sinecure to his homeboy?

    Time magazine reported that Brownie’s official bio described his only stint in emergency management as “assistant city manager” in Edmond, Okla. But a city official told Time that the FEMA chief had been “an assistant to the city manager,” which was “more like an intern.”

    Ever since W. was his father’s loyalty enforcer, his political decisions have been shaped more by loyalty than substance or competence. Mr. Bush never did warm up to his first secretary of state because Colin Powell rebuffed appeals to help out in the Tallahassee recount of 2000.

    The breakdown in management and communications was so execrable that the president learned about the 25,000 desperate, trapped people at the New Orleans convention center not from Brownie, who didn’t know himself, but from a wire story carried into the Oval Office by an aide on Thursday, 24 hours after the victims had been pleading and crying for help on every channel. (Maybe tomorrow the aide will come in with a wire story, “No W.M.D. in Iraq.”)

    “Getting truth on the ground in New Orleans was very difficult,” a White House aide told The Times’s Elisabeth Bumiller. Not if you had a TV.

    As Mexican troops arrived in Texas to help with Katrina refugees, Brownie was recalled to Washington, where he said he wanted to get “a good Mexican meal and a stiff margarita.” Yeah, it was hard to get any good étouffée in New Orleans given the E. coli. The president should find that little bullhorn from ground zero, put it right on Brownie’s ear and yell at him to get the heck out of there.

    FEMA was a disaster waiting to happen, the minute a disaster struck. As The Washington Post reported Friday, five of the eight top FEMA officials were simply Bush loyalists and political operatives who “came to their posts with virtually no experience in handling disasters.”

    While many see the hideous rescue failures as disaster apartheid, Barbara Bush and other Republicans have tried to look on the bright side for the victims. The Wall Street Journal reported that Representative Richard Baker of Baton Rouge was overheard telling lobbyists: “We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn’t do it, but God did.”

    Even those who believe in intelligent design must surely agree that Brownie and Representative Baker weren’t part of it.

    E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com

    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company Home Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us Work for Us Back to Top






  •  




    George W. Bush

    September 16, 2005
    Amid the Ruins, a President Tries to Reconstruct His Image, Too
    By RICHARD W. STEVENSON

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 – George W. Bush, whose standing for the last four years has rested primarily on issues of war and peace, introduced himself to the nation on Thursday night in an unfamiliar and somewhat uncomfortable new role: domestic president.

    The violence of Hurricane Katrina and his faltering response to it have left to Mr. Bush the task not just of physically rebuilding a swath of the United States, but also of addressing issues like poverty and racial inequality that were exposed in such raw form by the storm.

    The challenge would be immense for any president, but is especially so for Mr. Bush. He is scrambling to assure a shaken, angry nation not only that is he up to the task but also that he understands how much it disturbed Americans to see their fellow citizens suffering and their government responding so ineffectually.

    So for nearly 30 minutes, he stood in a largely lifeless New Orleans and, to recast his presidency in response to one of the nation’s most devastating disasters, sought to show that he understands the suffering. He spoke of housing and health care and job training. He reached with rhetorical confidence for the uplifting theme that out of tragedy can emerge a better society, and he groped for what he lost in the wind and water more than two weeks ago: his well-cultivated image as a strong leader.

    It was not the president’s most stirring speech, but it conveyed a sense of command far more than his off-key efforts in the days immediately after the storm, when he often seemed more interested in bucking up government officials than in addressing the dire situation confronting hundreds of thousands of displaced and desperate people.

    But if the speech helped him clear his first hurdle by projecting the aura of a president at the controls, it probably did not, by itself, get him over a second: his need to erase or at least blur the image of a White House that was unresponsive to the plight of some of the country’s most vulnerable citizens and failed to manage the government competently.

    Whether he can put a floor under his falling poll numbers, restore his political authority and move ahead with his agenda will determine not just the course of his second term but the strength of his party, which by virtue of having controlled both the White House and the Congress for more than five years has trouble credibly pinning the blame elsewhere.

    “He was giving a speech as if the nation were disheartened and worried and had lost its spirit, but that’s not what people were thinking,” said Mickey Edwards, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma. “They were thinking, why did the government screw up?”

    To those storm victims in need of immediate help and to those who face the continued upheaval of their lives for weeks or months or longer, he offered an expansive government safety net of specific programs, from paying the costs of reuniting families to a commitment to moving everyone out of shelters into housing by mid-October. Doing so marked a distinct shift for a president whose perceived hostility or indifference to government’s role in social welfare programs – manifested in budgets that have sought to cut such programs or curtail them – has long been a flash point in his relationship with poor and minority voters.

    But if this was big government, it was at least in part on Mr. Bush’s ideological terms: federal reimbursement to allow displaced students to attend private and parochial schools, tax-free business zones, a call for charitable and religious groups to continue with relief work. Having no choice but to open the fiscal floodgates, he sought to reassure nervous conservatives that he would guard against fraud and waste.

    When it came to the issues hardest to address and most in need of sustained commitment, new ideas and risk-taking leadership – the gap between rich and poor, its causes and consequences, its racial components – he was less effective.

    “We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action,” he said.

    Yet he spoke of “deep, persistent poverty” as something the nation had seen on television rather than as a condition that many citizens had been living in for generations. He defined the problem as regional rather than national in scope, and offered only regional rather than national solutions.

    “The reconstruction, massive as it is, is really the easy part,” said Bruce Reed, president of the Democratic Leadership Council, an organization of centrist Democrats. “Rebuilding confidence, especially among the poor and vulnerable, is going to be extraordinarily difficult.”

    In dealing with the more concrete aspects of the job ahead, Mr. Bush slipped comfortably into the language that he has used as commander in chief to comfort and exhort the nation as it has waged war, hailing those Americans who have “served and sacrificed” and vowing that the government “will stay as long as it takes” to get the job done, an echo, almost word for word, of his formulation for how long the United States will remain in Iraq.

    The president forthrightly linked the failures in response to the storm to a vulnerability to a terrorist attack and said he wanted to know “all the facts” about what had gone wrong.

    Mr. Bush called for unity in tackling the problems. But with only a camera before him, and New Orleans silent around him, he could draw no strength or self-assurance from the cheers of a united nation, as he did when he addressed a joint session of Congress nine days after the Sept. 11 attacks. Not only did his own stagecraft leave him alone in the spotlight, but whatever good will flowed to him across the aisle in those moments after the terrorist attacks is long gone, a victim of a polarized political culture that he did not create but to which he has often contributed.

    For Mr. Bush, this was a moment for the country to turn away from what he and his aides have dismissively labeled “the blame game” toward a hopeful vision of a rebuilt Gulf Coast and a smarter government. But it is not yet clear that his performance will stanch the political wounds he has suffered or ensure that he can avoid being hobbled through his second term, not just by what he lost in the faltering response to Hurricane Katrina but by the rising death toll in Iraq, sky-high energy prices and worrisome deficits.



    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company Home Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map Back to Top

  • Mikey Patrick Whelan




    Mikey Patrick Whelan, Fire and Sun Tae Kwan Do School. Las Vegas, Nevada. 2001

  •  




    Olivia Frances Whelan, Februrary 5, 1995 U.C.S.D. Hospital, Hillcrest, San Diego, California



  • Las Vegas, Nevada 1996.
    Olivia Frances and “DA”


  • Moonlight Beach, Encinitas, California 1999

  •  




    Michael Patrick, Olivia Frances and “DA”