Bob Dylan in 1963

Jim Marshall
Bob Dylan in 1963, from Martin Scorsese’s “No Direction Home: Bob Dylan.”
Montoya wins Brazilian GP, Alonso is world champion

Podium: race winner Juan Pablo Montoya with Kimi Raikkonen and Fernando Alonso
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race
Montoya wins Brazilian GP, Alonso is world champion
Racing series F1
Date 2005-09-25
By Nikki Reynolds – Motorsport.com
McLaren’s Juan Pablo Montoya took victory at the Brazilian Grand Prix after gaining the lead early in the race and holding it to the chequered flag. Kimi Raikkonen was second to give McLaren its first one-two finish for five years. However, the biggest result was that Renault’s Fernando Alonso finished third to become the youngest ever Formula One world champion.
There was rain at Interlagos on Sunday morning but by the time for the race it was dry, although there were damp patches on the track and the weather was overcast. Sauber had made an alteration to Jacques Villeneuve’s car, the roll bar, under parc fermé conditions, which is not permitted, so Villeneuve had to start from the pit lane as a penalty.
Tiago Monteiro’s Jordan pulled into the pit lane at the end of the formation lap with a clutch gremlin, which wasted his excellent qualifying result. At the start pole-sitter Alonso shot away in the lead and Raikkonen just flew off the line from fifth to attack the third placed Renault of Giancarlo Fisichella. He quickly got past, as did Ferrari’s Michael Schumacher but behind them there was trouble.
In the midfield David Coulthard’s Red Bull took on the Williams pair of Antonio Pizzonia and Mark Webber in front. They rapidly discovered that three cars into the space of one does not go; it was difficult to see exactly what happened but it appeared that Pizzonia and Coulthard touched first then Pizzonia hit Webber. All three spun off at the first corner, Pizzonia and Coulthard out while Webber managed to get back to the pits.
It was a lost cause for Webber as his car burst into flames at the rear, which was quickly extinguished by the pit crew. “I got a reasonable start,” said Webber. “Down to the first corner David and Antonio touched and Antonio spun into me. I had bodywork damage but I didn’t know if it could be repaired but then the car caught fire anyway.” As it happened, Williams managed to repair the car and send Webber back out later.
Due to the incident the safety car was deployed for a couple of laps while the debris was cleared. Alonso was leading Montoya and Raikkonen but when the safety car went in Alonso had a wobble at the first corner and went a wide. He did pretty well to keep it on track but Montoya charged and got past for the lead. Raikkonen was then right behind Alonso and behind them Fisichella got back past Michael for fourth.
Jenson Button’s BAR had dropped a couple of places at the start and was sixth, followed by Christian Klien’s Red Bull and the Ferrari of Rubens Barrichello. Felipe Massa, who was eighth on the grid, also lost out and the Sauber was tenth behind the Toyota of Ralf Schumacher. Takuma Sato, who had started from the back, got his BAR up to 11th and Toyota’s Jarno Trulli, who also started from near the back, was up to 13th.
After the exciting and confusing start, the race settled down and was less than spectacular for the remainder. Montoya, Alonso and Raikkonen were holding station at the front, Montoya four seconds ahead of the Renault. Massa was the first to pit on lap 18, followed by the Jordan of Narain Karthikeyan. Villeneuve was stuck behind the Minardi of Robert Doornbos in 13th but finally managed to get past.
Montoya and Alonso were trading fastest laps then Alonso pitted on lap 22. He rejoined sixth and Fisichella and Barrichello came in on the next lap. The rest cycled through at regular intervals, Michael getting back ahead of Fisichella, and Montoya came in on lap 28. He rejoined behind Raikkonen as Kimi was on a very long first stint. The Finn pitted on lap 31 and many thought that he was on a one-stopper, but it didn’t appear that he was fuelled enough to get to the flag.
The top three retained formation, followed by Michael, Fisichella and Sato, who had yet to pit, then Button and Barrichello. Villeneuve finally took his first stop on lap 35 and Sato was the last to pit a couple of laps later. That allowed Klien to move back into the points in eighth. Doornbos pulled into the pits to retire with an oil leak and Barrichello was homing in on Button. He got past the BAR after a bit of a tussle through the first two corners.
The middle stint of the race was fairly sedate and Massa kicked off the second round of stops. Ralf jumped Klien’s Red Bull to gain eighth but aside from that there were no changes. Monteiro, who was doing so well with his season of finishing every race, pulled his Jordan off track with a hydraulic problem. Raikkonen sped into the pits for a quick splash-and-dash second stop but it didn’t gain him any ground. He came out alongside Montoya but Juan Pablo had the momentum and stayed ahead.
And that was pretty much it. There was no reason for Montoya to help Raikkonen as Alonso was running a solid third, which was what the Spaniard needed to secure the title. So the McLarens held formation and Montoya took the chequered flag to win his second consecutive Brazilian GP. With Raikkonen second, McLaren’s one-two now puts the team two points ahead of Renault in the constructors’ standings.
“That was a lot of fun,” said Montoya. “I had a really good fight with Kimi and it was definitely not easy keeping him behind. He came especially close after the second pitstop but not close enough. It’s great to win in Brazil for the second time in a row particularly as a lot of Colombian fans come here to support me. I think we definitely deserve the Constructors’ Championship and I can’t wait for the last two races. Also well done to Fernando.”
Raikkonen, naturally, was disappointed but vows to fight on. “Congratulations to Fernando, but he better be prepared for me and the team to fight him hard for the rest of the season and next year. Today’s race was quite difficult and my car was not easy to drive. I carried a bit more fuel than Juan Pablo, but I still was not able to get past him in the pitstops, and he drove a good race.”
Of course, despite McLaren’s well deserved result, Interlagos was all about Alonso. It had seemed inevitable for some time that Fernando would surely win the title and the 24 year-old Spaniard did what he had to do in Brazil to become the youngest ever world champion, beating a record set in 1972 by Emerson Fittipaldi. Alonso took off his helmet in parc fermé, looking very calm and collected, paused, then let out a heartfelt scream of triumph. A deserved one at that.
“It is too early to realise what is happening to me, and I think I will only understand properly in the days to come,” said the new champion. “So far, I have spoken to the King of Spain, the Prince and the Prime Minister — it is impossible to really say anything about it now.”
“I want to dedicate this championship to my family, and all my close friends who have supported me through my career. Spain is not a country with an F1 culture, and we had to fight alone, every step of the way, to make this happen. A huge thank you to the team as well: they are the best in Formula 1, and we have done this together.”
Ferrari was a little more competitive, with Michael fourth and Barrichello sixth, although obviously it was a result below the Scuderia’s aspirations. Fisichella came home fifth and Button’s BAR just didn’t have the straight line speed to keep him near the front and he finished seventh. Ralf took the final point in eighth. Klien’s Red Bull didn’t have the race pace after his exemplary qualifying performance and he finished ninth. Sato completed the top ten.
Massa and Villeneuve squabbled amongst themselves and were 11th and 12th respectively, while Trulli struggled home 13th. Christijan Albers was almost unseen and bought his Minardi across the line 14th, with Karthikeyan trailing behind in 15th to be the last finisher. After the first couple of laps of intrigue Brazil was not really a very exciting race as far as action was concerned, but a race that sees a new champion crowned for the first time in five years has an excitement of its own.
Alonso is a very deserving champion. Some may say that Fernando was lucky but that’s an argument that does not hold up. A driver may win a race or two thanks to the misfortunes of rivals but a world championship is not won by luck. Congratulations to Fernando Alonso and to Renault for giving him the car to do it. Final top eight classification: Montoya, Raikkonen, Alonso, M. Schumacher, Fisichella, Barrichello, Button, R. Schumacher

Fernando Alonso and Flavio Briatore
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race

2005 World Champion Fernando Alonso celebrates
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race

Fernando Alonso
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-23 (Interlagos): Friday practice 1

Driver suit of Michael Schumacher
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-23 (Interlagos): Friday practic

Fernando Alonso
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-23 (Interlagos): Friday practice

2005 World Champion Fernando Alonso celebrates with Renault F1 team members
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday r
Monday, September 26, 2005

2005 World Champion Fernando Alonso celebrates with Renault F1 team members
F1 > Brazilian GP, 2005-09-25 (Interlagos): Sunday race
Brazilian GP: Renault race notes
Fernando Alonso third and Giancarlo Fisichella fifth this afternoon in Brazil. The Spaniard becomes the youngest world champion in F1 history.
Fernando Alonso today became the youngest world champion in Formula One history, after his thirteenth podium finish of the 2005 season in the Brazilian Grand Prix at Interlagos.
Starting from pole position, the Spaniard drove a characteristically aggressive, consistent race to claim third position at the flag. With a championship lead of 23 points, and only two races remaining in the 2005 season, he therefore has an unassailable lead in the drivers’ championship.
At 24 years old, he therefore will become the youngest world champion in F1 history, in addition to the records of youngest holder of pole position and youngest race-winner he already holds.
Team-mate Giancarlo Fisichella suffered a more complicated race, after struggling with oversteer that limited his pace. After starting third, the Italian finished fifth, just behind Michael Schumacher’s Ferrari.
The Mild Seven Renault F1 Team now occupies second place in the constructors’ championship with 162 points, 2 behind McLaren Mercedes. An all-out fight for the constructors’ crown will be the object of the final two races of the season.
Fernando Alonso: 3rd
“It is too early to realise what is happening to me, and I think I will only understand properly in the days to come. So far, I have spoken to the King of Spain, the Prince and the Prime Minister — it is impossible to really say anything about it now.”
“I thought we could fight with the McLarens today but it was clear after the first stops that we couldn’t keep their pace, so I just concentrated on controlling Michael Schumacher behind me, and managing the tyres.”
“The engineers were also worried it might rain, so in the last laps I was really focusing on that, and preserving the tyres, and I was sure there were strange noises coming from the car, so it was only when I crossed the line that I realised I had become world champion!”
“I want to dedicate this championship to my family, and all my close friends who have supported me through my career. Spain is not a country with an F1 culture, and we had to fight alone, every step of the way, to make this happen.”
“A huge thank you to the team as well: they are the best in Formula 1, and we have done this together. It will say that I am world champion, but we are all champions, and they deserve this.”
“Now, I can go to the last two races and enjoy them a bit more. We made some conservative decisions in some of the last races, and now we will be able to race with nothing to lose until the end of the season.
Giancarlo Fisichella, 5th:
“I had poor rear end grip at the beginning of the race, and that meant I was struggling with oversteer in the high speed and low speed corners, and just trying to keep the car on the circuit.”
“To be honest, I was a little disappointed to finish fifth because we should have been able to beat the Ferrari today, but the really important thing is Fernando becoming world champion. I am very happy for him, he has done a great season with no mistakes, and I wish him all the best.”
“But we still have a second crown to race for, and we need to keep fighting against McLaren to get back the lead. I though we were much closer to them this weekend, so their pace in the race was a surprise. We’re not giving up though, and we will fight to the very end of the season.
Flavio Briatore, Managing Director:
“I am just delighted today. For Fernando of course, who has been fantastic all season, and for the team as well. They have produced a fantastic car and even if McLaren has been quicker, the points tell the only story that matters, over nineteen races.”
“Fernando is just 24 years old, and he has been an incredible leader in this championship. The team works to make the car quicker, and he transforms that into results: that gives the team amazing motivation.”
“Of course, we have to thank the team back in Enstone and Viry, all the partners who have supported us to make this championship possible, and everybody at the Renault group: they have all been part of a fantastic adventure.”
“Now, we need to do our best in the constructors’ championship, with Fisico and Fernando both pushing hard. We are doing our best to get closer to McLaren, and to take it down to the final race.”
Pat Symonds, Executive Director of Engineering:
“Fernando is a worthy champion, and thoroughly deserves every success he has achieved this year. The race itself was not dramatic for either driver, but it certainly produced a spectacular result.”
“Now, we will be focusing 100% on the constructors’ championship. There is no doubt McLaren are quicker than us, and we relinquished our lead today — albeit by a slender margin. But the team is working hard to develop the car and improve our speed, and we were certainly closer to them this weekend thanks to the developments at Enstone and Viry.”
“We fully intend to take the fight to McLaren right up until Shanghai. But first things first: we will be celebrating a worthy champion this evening, and letting the feeling sink in properly!”
-renault-
Exiled Iranians Try to Foment Revolution From France

Stuart Isett for The New York Times
“I’m optimistic. It may not happen in my generation, but eventually the mullahs will go.”
AUVERS-SUR-OISE, France
MARYAM RAJAVI, a wide-eyed woman who goes by the title president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, is eager to talk about the latest discovery by her spies: mile-long tunnels, large enough to drive trucks into, dug into the mountains outside of Tehran.
“There are at least 14 to 15 tunnels of this magnitude that have been built secretly,” she said, sitting in a cream-colored reception room on the cramped grounds of her compound here. She suggested that the tunnels were hiding elements of a clandestine nuclear weapons program that the United States suspects exists but that inspectors have yet to find.
It would be easy to dismiss Mrs. Rajavi as a self-serving political zealot in a powder-blue suit with matching head scarf and shoes, except that her group has been right before.
In August 2002 the group, which says it has thousands of followers based in Iraq, announced that Iran was pursuing a secret uranium enrichment program that could be used in building a nuclear bomb. The information turned out to be true and led to the current standoff over Iran’s nuclear development program. The group’s many subsequent disclosures have been either less significant or plain wrong.
The sleepy town of Auvers-sur-Oise, 20 miles northwest of Paris, is best known as the place where van Gogh lived the last months of his life. Japanese and American tourists wander uncertainly down its main street, peering at reproductions of his paintings in front of the buildings that they portray. Few of the tourists are aware that the town is now home to an almost cult-like Iranian opposition group, some of whose members have divorced their spouses as an act of loyalty to the cause and whose armed wing is on the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations. The group’s devotion to Mrs. Rajavi is so extreme that some members set themselves on fire when she was briefly detained by the French police two years ago.
Mrs. Rajavi, 52, favors color-coordinated outfits that bring out the blue in her pale gray eyes and has a broad, almost impish smile that threatens to spill into laughter at almost any moment. She grew up in Tehran as the daughter of a middle-class civil servant descended from a member of the Qajar dynasty, which ruled Iran for 125 years before a 1921 coup by Reza Khan, an army officer, led to his election as hereditary shah four years later and the establishment of the Pahlavi dynasty.
THE family opposed the Pahlavis’ rule, and Mrs. Rajavi said her own activism began in earnest when she was 22 after her sister, Narges, was killed by the shah’s secret police. Mrs. Rajavi soon joined the Mujahedeen Khalq, or People’s Holy Warriors, an association of leftist students formed in 1965 that became one of the most active groups opposing Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Mrs. Rajavi gradually rose in the ranks of the mujahedeen and, after the shah’s overthrow in 1979, she married a fellow member and had two children. But the family fled to France after the Islamic government of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini turned against the mujahedeen and began executing its members. Mrs. Rajavi said another of her sisters, who was eight months pregnant, was killed in the crackdown.
In Paris, Mrs. Rajavi worked closely with the mujahedeen’s charismatic leader, Massoud Rajavi, whose first wife, Ashraf, had also been killed in Iran. Mr. Rajavi’s second wife was the daughter of Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, Iran’s progressive president in the early days following the shah’s fall. His second marriage ended after he and Mr. Bani-Sadr had a falling out in exile. Mrs. Rajavi said her own marriage to Mr. Rajavi, in 1985, was a calculated political move.
“My responsibility against the mullahs’ regime and against Khomeini drove me to the conclusion that I couldn’t have the same normal marital relationship that people in ordinary lives would have,” she said. “So it was my own very definitely political decision.”
Mr. Rajavi was expelled from France in 1986 and moved to Iraq, where he established a military camp named after his first wife. He was last seen shortly before the American invasion and, according to the mujahedeen, he is presumed to be in hiding from Iranian assassination squads. Mrs. Rajavi will say only that she is sure he is alive. In the meantime, she is in charge of the exile group.
In her small, leafy compound squeezed between the town’s soccer field and the Oise River, Mrs. Rajavi and about 100 followers pursue their single-minded goal of overthrowing the fundamentalist Islamic theocracy in Tehran and installing a government of their own with Mrs. Rajavi as president until new elections can be held.
None of Mrs. Rajavi’s answers are short or immediately to the point. She speaks volumes on a Castro-like scale, though her message remains a narrow one: that the organization has been unfairly labeled a terrorist organization out of the West’s misguided efforts to engage the Iranian government, and that the only real hope to effect change in Iran short of war is to support her organization and give it free rein.
She presents herself as a beacon of progressive Islamic politics, the antithesis, as she puts it, of the fundamentalist Shiite mullahs running Iran. But the rigidity of her organization and extreme devotion of its members has given the organization a fanatical cast.
HER smile takes on a steely glint when she discusses the mass divorces ordered by the group’s leadership, which split the movement’s families in 1989 and sent their children into foster care abroad. The policy has focused energy on the cause instead of personal relations, she said.
“Our members can’t have, because of the circumstances, the normal marital status in life that everyone else in the world can enjoy,” Mrs. Rajavi said, arguing that the movement faces a “ferocious” enemy and followers cannot afford to be distracted.
To illustrate her point, she opened a thick book filled with photos of people she says were supporters of the movement who were killed by the Iranian government. There are 21,676 names in the book, just a sixth of the “martyrs” that her organization claims to date.
“Every single member of this movement sincerely believes in the goal of democracy and has made sacrifices for it,” Mrs. Rajavi said, her smile never wavering. “I don’t call this fanaticism.”
Only on the subject of the self-immolations by some members does she concede that devotion to the cause has sometimes been misdirected. After the police took her into custody in July 2003 during an investigation of the group, several followers set themselves on fire. Two died.
“I was extremely saddened by those deaths,” she said, but she blamed the French authorities for not letting her speak to the demonstrators who had gathered to protest her arrest. She said the followers believed that she and her followers were going to be deported to Iran, “so they felt that there was nothing else that they could do.”
Many critics say the organization is reviled in much of Iran for having sought shelter with Saddam Hussein’s government in Iraq, but Mrs. Rajavi says that is not so. She denies that the movement ever accepted financial support from Iraq or fought against Iraqi Shiites and Kurds on Mr. Hussein’s behalf, as some people claim. As evidence of her organization’s continuing viability, she cites the group’s revelations about Iran’s secret nuclear activities.
“This is the result of a resistance movement having a very wide social base and having deep roots and being present in all sectors of Iranian society,” she said, leaning back and opening her hands.
Mrs. Rajavi’s French residence permit expires in 2006. While her aides say she has been given permanent political-refugee status in France, that has not been confirmed by French officials. Iraq, meanwhile, has inserted a clause in its draft constitution that prohibits political asylum for “those accused of committing international or terror crimes,” making the group’s future welcome there uncertain.
Still, Mrs. Rajavi keeps smiling.
“I’m optimistic,” she said. “It may not happen in my generation, but eventually the mullahs will go.”
Buzz Yahoo
Seeking Meaning in Search
Thursday September 22, 2005 3:00AM PT
Dictionary Searches |
Whether it’s a three-dollar word tossed around at congressional hearings or the latest journalistic jargon, confounding words are ubiquitous.
Let’s look up the top 10 entries in the Search lexicon…
Where’s the Party? Scottsdale!

Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times
Scottsdale, Ariz., hot spots include, Club e4.
By MICHELLE HIGGINS
WHEN Steve G. Bernath, 32, an engineer from San Jose, Calif., visited a friend in Scottsdale two years ago, he expected a sleepy community full of “golf fanatics and blue-haired women,” he said. But a weekend of clubbing quickly changed his mind. “I was in awe actually as far as the night life,” he said.
And he was back last weekend with 14 pals for a friend’s bachelor party. “It’s hip,” he said, beer in hand, surrounded by a gaggle of women in the pool at the year-old James Hotel. “It’s happening. There’s definitely a stepped-up night life.”
Hip? Happening? Scottsdale? Long associated with golf, grand dame resorts and retirees, this suburb of Phoenix is fast on its way to becoming a hipster hot spot. Nightclubs, chic hotels, trendy bars and restaurants that cater to a young, fashion-conscious crowd have been popping up.
Party central is the James, a joint project of the New York restaurateur Stephen Hanson and Danny Errico, founder of the fashionable Equinox Fitness Clubs. Its J Bar, where Bond movies are projected on the wall, draws a steady flow of pretty people.
But it just got some competition. In July, the nightclub e4 opened nearby. It features rooms and a patio designed around the four elements – earth, air, fire and water. On a recent Friday night, a throng of 20- and 30-somethings pulsated to house music next to a 20-foot waterfall inside e4′s Liquid Room, while others smoked, sipped cocktails and watched flat-screen TV’s outdoors on the Air Patio.
A few blocks away, men with painstakingly tousled hair and tan women in spaghetti-strapped tops crowded into the bar at Stingray Sushi, a restaurant that hit the scene in December. Cocktails there have names like Godzilla and Lychee Circus, and a fish tank housing – yes – stingrays is built into the floor at the entrance.
And at Sanctuary on Camelback Mountain, a resort and spa north of town, the only seating available at its restaurant, elements – yet another trendy lower-case e name – was at the Community Table. In the middle of the restaurant, it seats 14 and can’t be reserved, intended as it is for diners who want to socialize over orange miso chicken or pecan dusted tilapia.
In all, there are roughly 50 nightclubs, up from about 30 just a few years ago, and more than 600 restaurants, compared to 400 in 1994, according to the Scottsdale Convention & Visitors Bureau. Scottsdale has even started a New Year’s Eve block party. Last year’s attracted an estimated 8,000-plus partyers, the visitors bureau said. Not bad for a town better known for early-bird specials.
“I think it’s one of the best cities on the West Coast to go out partying,” said Hugo Gamboa, 37, a nightclub and restaurant owner from San Francisco in town with Mr. Bernath for the bachelor party. “It’s a mix between Las Vegas and L.A. You get that flavor.”
It wasn’t always that way. Just five years ago, chain restaurants and Southwestern gift shops and galleries dominated downtown and there was little in the way of housing. Then the city came up with a new revitalization plan to spur investment in the area. Soon, new bars, restaurants and boutique hotels were opening – none more notable than the James, where each minimalist-chic room contains a flat-screen TV, martini set and intimacy kit.
The James’s blue and pink facade stands out in garish contrast to the brown and burnt-sienna hues of Scottsdale’s adobe-style downtown. The hotel rooms are situated around its two pools – the Relaxation pool, set in a lush garden, and the Play pool, which with its bar has become so popular it warrants a doorman.
Just inside the entranceway of the Play pool on a recent afternoon, music blasted, mist sprayed from a slatted overhang and men in surfer swimsuits and sunglasses congregated around a pool table, looking as if they were straight out of “Entourage.” Couples lounged on wide white outdoor beds while singles floated and frolicked in the water. From the bar, patrons could watch guests pump iron at the glass-enclosed gym across the way or gaze at bikini-clad sunbathers.
THE night life here is really cool,” said Ilana Fisher, 25, a recent college graduate from Lansing, Mich., as she lounged poolside in a purple bikini in the dry Arizona heat. After visiting Scottsdale for the first time last October, Ms. Fisher decided to move to the area. In Michigan, she said, “there was a lack of anything social other than the movies.”
New projects under way are designed to court young people like Ms. Fisher soon. Construction is nearing completion on the first parts of the new Waterfront development – an 11-acre site along the northern banks of the Arizona Canal in downtown that will offer a mix of residential, retail and office space.
The retro-chic Hotel Valley Ho, built in 1956, and once a playground for celebrities like Clark Gable, Humphrey Bogart and Natalie Wood, is getting a $70 million facelift. It is slated to reopen in December, with 194 rooms and a Trader Vic’s restaurant. Not to be left out, Starwood Hotels & Resorts is planning to open a W Hotel in 2007.
Many young residents welcome the change. “It used to be this dumpy looking kind of town,” said Nikki Faigus, 34, a homemaker from Scottsdale sitting at a table of a dozen women in designer jeans and flashy tops. “Now it’s more fashionable.” The group was celebrating two birthdays with sushi and Asahi beer in the ultrasuede-covered booths at Stingray Sushi.
“I think it’s finally come into its own,” added her friend Alicia Livingston, 36, an investment banker visiting from New York. “I think it’s finally found its identity – fashionable but still down to earth.”
After dining on sushi and teriyaki chicken, the group headed over to e4 a little before 11 o’clock. There, a 100-person line was already starting to snake around the corner. No problem – the women talked their way into the V.I.P. entrance.
Not everyone in conservative Scottsdale is entirely happy about the budding nightlife scene. The Love Bug, a three-year-old erotic boutique, sits among a mix of bars and interior design shops on Craftsman Court, a street that also includes the downtown Visitors Center. Earlier this year, the shop’s owner, Wendy Cashaback, hung T-shirts splashed with obscenities in the window. Not long afterward, the Scottsdale police received complaints from residents and issued a formal request to take them down. Ms. Cashaback moved the offending garments inside, but noted that they were the best-selling items in the store, which stays open late on weekends to attract customers from nearby bars and clubs.
And this is still hardly the Meatpacking District or South Beach. By day, no one’s rollerblading through town in a bikini. Outside of downtown, golf resorts and senior living communities remain the norm. Indeed, the new clubs and restaurants are spread out in pockets – a cluster of nightclubs at the northern end of downtown, a row of bars on Craftsman Court near the Fifth Avenue shopping district, and the James in Old Town. Throughout downtown, restaurant chains and Southwestern-themed shops hawking cowboy boots, turquoise jewelry and jackalopes still dominate.
After dark, on Main Street, old-timers wearing wrangler shirts and cowboy hats dance to country tunes at the Rusty Spur Saloon – a kitschy Western bar that used to be a bank. The bank vault serves as a liquor cabinet and beer cooler. And though there are no fish tanks, waterfalls or drinks with fanciful names, some hipsters prefer it to the trendy spots popping up around town.
“There are not a lot of dive bars in Scottsdale,” said Jason Miller, a 27-year-old financial adviser. “This is the coolest bar in town because it’s real.”
If You Go
Downtown Scottsdale is roughly 20 minutes from the Phoenix airport. Most downtown hotspots are within walking distance of each other, as the entire district is only about two miles long and a mile wide. Still, nearly everyone drives, making parking an issue at peak hours.
Stay at the James Hotel (7353 East Indian School Road, 480-308-1100) for prime people watching and V.I.P. access to its hot J Bar. Flashing a hotel room key will get you and a guest past any doorman. Current rates range from $229 for a standard room to $429 for a suite. In high season (January to April) those same rooms go for $279 to $509.
For something more secluded but still chic, head north to the Sanctuary on Camelback Mountain (5700 East McDonald Drive, Paradise Valley; 480-948-2100) and check into one of its newly remodeled casitas with 42-inch flat-screen TV’s and steel-blue sofas. Rates are $400 to $550.
Both hotels offer trendy restaurants. There’s also Stingray Sushi (4302 North Scottsdale Road, 480-941-4460), which offers both raw and cooked dishes and fancy cocktails.
For dancing, the newest nightclub is e4 (4282 North Drinkwater Boulevard, 480-970-3325). Expect a line as early as 10:30 p.m. on weekends. BS West, which draws a gay crowd, is at the north end of Craftsman Court. Other clubs like Axis/Radius, Suede and Myst, all within blocks of one another south of Camelback Road and east of Scottsdale Road, also draw a young, energetic crowd.
Intimate Snapshots of the War Called Hell

Nancy Crampton
E. L. Doctorow.
September 20, 2005
Intimate Snapshots of the War Called Hell
By MICHIKO KAKUTANI
“War is hell,” William Tecumseh Sherman famously observed.
Sherman was in a position to know. An unforgiving advocate of “total war,” he marched his Union Army through the heart of Georgia, torched Atlanta, then turned southeast to the sea, cutting a path of destruction hundreds of miles long. He reached Savannah by December 1864, presenting the city as a “Christmas gift” to President Lincoln, then headed north toward the Carolinas. In the course of his march through Dixie, his troops burned and pillaged and looted, destroying railroads, warehouses, factories, plantations and private homes – in an effort to destroy the Southern economy and break the will of the Confederacy.
“War is cruelty,” Sherman asserted. “There’s no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.”
In his arresting new novel “The March,” E. L. Doctorow mixes fact and fiction, real characters and made-up ones, to give the reader a bloody, tactile portrait of Sherman’s infamous march and a visceral understanding of the horrors of war. Although the novel is less inventive, less innovative than his 1975 classic “Ragtime,” it showcases the author’s bravura storytelling talents and instinctive ability to empathize with his characters, while eschewing the self-conscious pyrotechnics and pretentious abstractions that have hobbled his recent books like “City of God.”
Some of the wide-angled views of war presented in “The March” will be familiar to fans of “Gone With the Wind”: Southern families loading up carts with their most treasured possessions, as they flee the approaching Union Army; dozens upon dozens of dying and wounded soldiers awaiting treatment in hastily improvised field hospitals; flames devouring the cities of the South, as giddy soldiers and shell-shocked residents look on.
“You could go for miles without seeing an end to the procession of troops and horses and wagons,” Mr. Doctorow writes of Sherman’s armies. “An eagle aloft in the April winds high over the landscape would only see something iridescently blue and side-winding that looked like the floodplain of a river.”
Such panoramic vistas, however, are the exception in this novel, which is dedicated to giving the reader a series of intimate snapshots of the war. By cutting back and forth between various characters’ stories, Mr. Doctorow shows how that conflagration overturned people’s lives, tearing up families, torpedoing communities and subjecting men, women and children to the cacophonous, centrifugal forces of history. He does not delve into the reasons for the war or the ravages of slavery, but instead focuses on the chaos and dislocations of battle: families losing their homes and livelihoods; soldiers on both sides losing their lives, their limbs, their sanity to the brutalities of combat.
The two characters with whom Mr. Doctorow most clearly sympathizes are Pearl, a teenage former slave, who succeeds in transcending her past through a redemptive act of charity toward her former owners; and Stephen Walsh, an introspective Union soldier who falls in love with her. During the opening salvos of Sherman’s march on Georgia, Pearl owes her survival to a series of lucky happenstances: she is adopted by a Yankee soldier, who disguises her as a drummer boy, and she later finds employment as a nurse’s aide with a doctor who is operating a field surgery for the Union wounded. Walsh, who received $300 for enlisting in the Union Army, feels only a “grim despair” over what he sees as an “insane war”; his one hope is that he and Pearl will somehow survive the war and figure out a way to invent a new life together.
Adding to the chorus of voices in “The March” are a motley assortment of Yankees and Rebels. There’s Emily Thompson, a prim young Southern woman, who finds herself having an affair with a Union doctor named Wrede Sartorius, whom she likens to “some god trying to staunch the flow of human disaster.” There’s Arly, a canny con man, whose comic peregrinations will take an unexpectedly violent turn, and there are Arly’s two reluctant sidekicks – Will, a hapless young deserter; and Calvin, a photographer’s assistant, who is determined to document the war.
The most venal aspects of the Union decimation of the South are personified by a lecherous Yankee officer named Kil Kilpatrick, who treats the war as a grand opportunity to loot and womanize, while the professionalism of the military is embodied by a Colonel Teack, who toasts Sherman’s tactical brilliance, but secretly scorns the general’s temperamental excesses.
As for Mr. Doctorow’s Sherman, he emerges as neither the evil madman, the “Nero of the 19th century” portrayed in Southern mythology, nor the military visionary hailed by some Northerners. Instead, he comes across as a mercurial, hard-charging general, by turns unforgiving and sentimental, savage and ruminative. “I have marched an army intact for four hundred miles,” he boasts. “I have gutted Johnny Reb’s railroads. I have burned his cities, his forges, his armories, his machine shops, his cotton gins. I have eaten out his crops, I have consumed his livestock and appropriated ten thousand of his horses and mules. He is left ravaged and destitute, and even if not another battle is fought his forces must wither and die of attrition.”
In actuality, the central character of this novel is not Sherman, but the Army he commands – and its inexorable march through Dixie. We see the Army in the opening days of the campaign as a motley group of men, led by sharply dressed drummer boys and walking “in a careless manner, chatting and laughing and looking anything but military.” As the war progresses, however, the Army becomes a force of nature, a swollen tide of locusts devouring anything in its path, only to end, in the final days of the conflict, as a spent and hungry beast.
“They were angry as only exhausted men can be,” Mr. Doctorow writes. “The clothes on their backs were not to be dignified as rags, and their shoeless feet were bloodied and swollen. There were no drummer boys to keep the pace. There was no pace.”
It is Mr. Doctorow’s achievement in these pages that in recounting Sherman’s march, he manages to weld the personal and the mythic into a thrilling and poignant story. He not only conveys the consequences of that campaign for soldiers and civilians in harrowingly intimate detail, but also creates an Iliad-like portrait of war as a primeval human affliction – “not war as adventure, nor war for a solemn cause,” but “war at its purest, a mindless mass rage severed from any cause, ideal, or moral principle,” a “characterless entanglement of brainless forces” as God’s answer “to the human presumption.”
Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company Home Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map Back to Top
2005 LASKER MEDICAL RESEARCH AWARDS

2005 LASKER MEDICAL RESEARCH AWARDS
The recipients of the 2005 Lasker Awards in Basic and Clinical Research, and Public Service, are as follows:
Basic Research: Earnest A. McCulloch and James E. Till for ingenious experiments that first identified a stem cell – the blood-forming stem cell – which set the stage for all current research of adult and embryonic stem cells.
Clinical Research: Edwin M. Southern and Alec John Jeffreys for development of two powerful technologies – Southern hybridization and DNA fingerprinting – that together revolutionized human genetics and forensic diagnostics.
Public Service: Nancy G. Brinker for creating one of the world’s great foundations devoted to curing breast cancer and dramatically increasing public awareness about this devastating disease.
September 18, 2005
Five Pioneers Are Awarded Lasker Medical Prizes
By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN
Correction Appended
The 2005 Lasker Awards for medical research are going to scientists who discovered stem cells, invented genetic fingerprinting and developed a powerful technology that played a crucial role in mapping the human genome.
And a nonscientist, Nancy Brinker, is the winner of the Lasker Public Service Award for creating the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, which has helped transform a disease once rarely mentioned in polite conversation into an international issue.
The awards, widely considered the United States’ most prestigious medical prizes, are being announced today by the Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation. The two scientific awards each carry a $50,000 prize, split between the winners; the public service award has no monetary prize.
Starting with $200, Ms. Brinker created the Komen foundation in 1982 to fulfill a promise to her sister, Susan Komen, who had died of breast cancer two years earlier, at age 36.
Among other things, Ms. Brinker started the Komen Race for the Cure, a series of five-kilometer running and walking races around the country that have helped the foundation raise more than $750 million to support breast cancer research, education, screening and treatment.
Ms. Brinker started and “nurtured the grass-roots breast cancer advocacy movement,” the Lasker Foundation said. Now 58, Ms. Brinker is also a breast cancer survivor.
Mary Lasker created the awards in 1946 as a birthday gift to her husband, Albert, in hopes of curing cancer in 10 years.
The research award for stem cell work is going to Drs. Ernest A. McCulloch and James E. Till, emeritus professors at the University of Toronto and the Ontario Cancer Institute.
Scientists had long theorized that the body contained cells that could renew themselves, mature and specialize in various ways. But no one had found them until Dr. McCulloch, now 79, and Dr. Till, 74, proved their existence in the blood-forming system.
Their work started in the late 1950′s, when scientists were trying to understand when and how radiation therapy stopped cancer and the military was seeking ways to treat personnel exposed to radiation from nuclear weapons.
Working with mice, Dr. McCulloch and Dr. Till designed a system to measure the sensitivity of bone marrow cells to radiation. With rigorous experiments that relied on principles from microbiology, they showed that the spleen contained cells that divided into the three main types of blood cells – red, white and platelets.
The findings led to a system for studying the factors that send the stem cells down different developmental paths, and helped transform the study of blood cells from an observational science to a more experimental one. Dr. McCulloch and Dr. Till found that molecules both within and outside a cell can determine its fate.
Their work also helped scientists learn how and why bone marrow transplants replenish blood cells, thereby improving a procedure that can prolong the lives of people with leukemia and other blood-cell cancers.
Sir Edwin Southern of the University of Oxford and Sir Alec J. Jeffreys of the University of Leicester in England received the Lasker Award for developing two powerful technologies, Southern blotting and DNA fingerprinting, that, the foundation said, “together revolutionized human genetics and forensic diagnostics.”
Working in Edinburgh in the 1970′s, Dr. Southern, now 79, developed the technique now known by his name that allowed detection of a single gene in a complex genome and that eventually enabled the rapid sequencing of entire genomes.
Suddenly, scientists had a new way to search for gene sequences of particular interest and to detect subtle DNA differences among individuals.
Scientists used the technique, for example, to pinpoint mutations linked to inherited diseases. Detection of such mutations has led to tests for prenatal detection of diseases like sickle cell anemia and thalassemia.
Southern blotting also led to the second breakthrough, genetic fingerprinting. The method provides a way to distinguish every person from every other person, except an identical twin.
Genetic fingerprinting has changed the way law enforcement agencies have solved new and old crimes like murder and rape, and has absolved the innocent, settled paternity and immigration disputes, helped improve techniques for transplanting organs and tissues, led to tests to detect and better understand inherited diseases, and helped establish human origins and migrations.
Dr. Jeffreys, now 55, was interested in uncovering genetic variation in different populations. He used the Southern blot technique to study certain DNA segments present in all humans. In 1984, he noticed in one Southern blot that the pattern of these segments varied from person to person, creating a unique genetic “fingerprint” of an individual.
He also found that parents passed the patterns on to their offspring, with each child carrying half of each parent’s fingerprint. Dr. Jeffreys’s “predictions about the utility of the method not only have been borne out, but have been surpassed,” the Lasker Foundation said.
Although the discoveries were made decades ago, the awards are being given this year because newer research has shown their broad potential, said Dr. Joseph L. Goldstein, chairman of the Lasker jury. Dr. Goldstein, a Nobel laureate from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, said that because it can take years to appreciate a discovery’s significance, awards are often given long after the discovery is made.
Correction: Sept. 20, 2005, Tuesday:
An article on Sunday about the 2005 Lasker Awards for medical research gave an incorrect age, supplied by the sponsors, for one winner, Sir Edwin Southern of Oxford. He is 67, not 79.
Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company Home Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map Back to Top
From Artist to Muse and Back to Artist

Jessica Brandi Lifland for The New York Times
Allyson Hollingsworth, the artist who inspired Steve Martin’s film “Shopgirl.”
By MARGY ROCHLIN
Berkeley, Calif.
WHEN the film version of Steve Martin’s best-selling novella, “Shopgirl,” opens next month, audiences will see just how much of himself Mr. Martin put into the adaptation: he wrote the screenplay, produced the film and stars as Ray Porter, a wealthy older man who enters into a relationship with a shy, depressed clerk (Claire Danes) who spends her days selling gloves at an elegant Beverly Hills department store and her nights making art at her small dining table.
But they will also see the work of the woman who inspired Mr. Martin’s tale in the first place: the artist Allyson Hollingsworth, who created the photographs and drawings attributed to Ms. Danes’s character, Mirabelle Buttersfield, and who also served as a consultant on the film. Ms. Hollingsworth previously worked as an art assistant on “Cheaper by the Dozen,” another of Mr. Martin’s movies, and jumped at this new opportunity, she said, when he offered it. And this time, her own artwork figured into the process: for example, Ms. Hollingsworth recreated one of her original pieces – a charcoal self-portrait of her nude body suspended in dark space – so it could be filmed for the movie as the work progressed.
“To actually be able to be paid to create something while I’m creating it?” said Ms. Hollingsworth, 36, sitting on a chair in her tidy, 9-by-13-foot white-walled studio here, dressed in baggy beige trousers and a pink and white cowboy shirt. “Not that that is a huge motivation for an artist, because that doesn’t happen very often, but to be able to sit there and draw all day? It was such a luxury. My whole life, I had day jobs and fit my art in between. This was absolutely phenomenal.”
At the time, Ms. Hollingsworth had yet to see “Shopgirl,” which was directed by Anand Tucker, but she did catch the two-and-a-half-minute trailer on the Internet. There is a scene where Ms. Danes, wearing a thin cotton gown, sets the timer on her Nikon camera and makes a nighttime dash into a faintly lighted grove of spindly trees. Then a click, and the image is captured. “It got me really excited to see my process reproduced: the car headlights, the freezing of the white figure against the trees,” Ms. Hollingsworth said.
The result is like a giant replica of a series of Ms. Hollingsworth’s ghostly, faux Victorian-era photographs featuring a sleepwalking bride, which appear in a show scheduled to open last night at the Michael Kohn Gallery in Los Angeles. “Oh, it was so cool,” she said of the movie scene.
This is her second one-person show, but the first time she is being featured as just an artist, not also an employee. From 1993 to 1996, she worked at what was then the Kohn-Turner gallery cataloging other people’s art. One day, Mr. Martin, a serious art collector and a regular customer, came by.
“As soon as he left, I looked at Allyson and said, ‘He likes you,’ and she got all red and embarrassed and said, ‘No, he does not,’ ” Michael Kohn, the gallery’s co-owner, recalled recently. “About an hour later there was a phone call, and it was Steve, and he asked to speak to her.” When “Shopgirl” the book was published in 2001, it wasn’t just the “To Allyson” dedication on the flyleaf that suggested who the book’s inspiration had been. “It was the truck that she drove, the cats that lived in her apartment, the apartment that was at the back of the complex,” Mr. Kohn said. “You didn’t have to suspend any disbelief, because he was very truthful to the model.”
And what is Ms. Hollingsworth’s own calculation of the fact-fiction ratio in the book? She replied in a manner that could have been lifted from actions of the self-conscious young woman in “Shopgirl.” First she stammered, then her voice trailed off, then she just fell silent. The flat expression on her face never changed, but discomfort seemed to roil just beneath the surface of her pale skin. The longer she remained silent, the heavier the molecules in the air grew. Finally, she spoke: “I’m a really private person. Even with friends, I have a certain reserve.”
“I think it’s from moving around so much when I was growing up,” said Ms. Hollingsworth, who was born in Columbia, Mo., and as the daughter of a career Army officer attended 12 schools before graduating from high school.
Still, she tried to push beyond her uneasiness and provide a better answer. “There are definitely movies like ‘Erin Brockovich’ or ‘A Beautiful Mind,’ based on a person’s life from Point A to Point B,” she said. “I would certainly say this wasn’t a biography. There were things inspired by experiences that I had, but they’ve been so changed in the process of writing fiction.” Ms. Hollingsworth’s hesitancy extended to any and all queries placing Mr. Martin and herself in a single sentence – including something as simple as how long they were a couple. “I don’t discuss my personal life,” she said. (Mr. Martin declined to be interviewed.)
Perhaps Ms. Hollingsworth would prefer that her art serve as the window into her soul. Having received her undergraduate degree in jewelry and metalsmithing at the Rhode Island School of Design in Providence, and a master’s degree in art at the California Institute of the Arts in Valencia, she now lives in Oakland and works in various media – drawing, photography, sculpture, installations – many of them made to look as if they were made at the turn of the 20th century. Even her playful pieces have an underlying sense of longing and sadness.
“For me, it’s about ephemera – her work is a lot about elegy and the question of mortality, what’s fragile,” said Gregory Hinton, a Los Angeles-based novelist who owns a few of Ms. Hollingsworth’s romantic creations, including a quilt made of glistening communion wafers linked together with tiny brass rings, a version of the nude floating in space from “Shopgirl,” as well as an antique handkerchief with the word “once” embroidered in the middle. “It’s like, ‘Once, I loved you,’ or ‘Once I dreamed about this,’ or ‘Once I was here,’ ” said Mr. Hinton. “She works in the past – like a love affair that’s gone.”
Recently, Ms. Hollingsworth reread “Shopgirl” and found it “moving,” she said. “It’s really amazing because the story that he wrote became a kind of universal theme. I think people can identify with love, loss and transforming.”
High: Napa Valley on $1,000 a Day

Peter DaSilva for The New York Times
Everywhere in Napa, grapes frame the experience. Related feature: Low: Napa on $250 a Day
Correction Appended
Before us lay a bonbon, ensconced on a half shell. We considered the bonbon, debated it, conceptually analyzed the bonbon. We were perplexed, our hard-worn sense of self and confidence plummeting as we tried in vain to decode the elusive yellow powder – clearly a curry of some sort – covering the bonbon.
I was seated with five strangers at an octagonal Moroccan wood table inlaid with geodes and agates for the by-appointment-only Harvey Tasting at the Swanson Vineyards in Rutherford, Calif. We were swaddled in impossibly theatrical décor, surrounded by paintings of vintage peasants. At the table, besides the spiteful bonbon, were six varieties of wine, three types of cheese, a caviar dollop atop crème fraîche atop a potato chip, and four members of the famous Puck family, sans Wolfgang.
“Does anyone experience a tannin?” inquired Shawn Q. Larue, the winery’s salonnier and Perle Mesta. The salon is an ingenious attempt to distinguish Swanson, owned by the TV-dinner family, from tasting rooms for hoi polloi. (Wolfgang’s 23- year-old nephew Lukas correctly identified tannin in the fortified Muscat.)
But deconstructing the particle physics of the bonbon – a heady mix of pink peppercorns, Chinese star anise, clove and cumin over a ganache blended with a $55-a-bottle cabernet and syrah – taxed us to our very marrow. That’s what happens when one is given $1,000 to spend over 24 hours in the monoculture of fabulousness that is Napa.
Of course, surrealism comes with the terroir. My original fantasy had been to stay at the Auberge du Soleil, the lush Mediterranean cloister in Rutherford for haves in seersucker persimmon robes perched on a hill overlooking the valley – specifically, the elite “up valley” north of the city of Napa, where the road gets thin and beautiful and so do the people. But it soon was clear that the Auberge’s lowest midweek rates – $550 for a room above the restaurant or $650 for the cheapest cottage – would stress even my Kate Spade pocketbook.
A friend had told me about the Carneros Inn, a new resort in a less fashionable but up-and-coming part of the valley, straddling Napa and Sonoma. The appeal, besides the summer special of $355 – a sum that my husband, Roger, and I might spend once a year for our anniversary – was an intriguing spa menu that seemed very Napa.
It was thematically divided into “the harvests” (orchard olive stone and honey dew exfoliation), “the cellars” (Bulgarian rose and grape seed), “the minerals” (largely gemstones – ho hum) and the one that sold me, “the farms.” I was instantly captivated by the idea of a warm goat butter massage, which elicited visions of healing angelic goats imparting a chèvre for my soul that would soothe a multitude of woes.
Apparently, I was not the only one with an agricultural fantasy. I checked into the inn amazed to discover a new style of architecture – 4-H Modernism: as if Ma and Pa Kettle had gone to architecture school and became New Urbanists. The rooms, which resembled chic sharecroppers’ cabins outfitted with bottles of Domaine Carneros champagne, were winsome tin-roofed, board-and-batten cottages in haute cracker style, with old-fashioned front porches, rocking chairs and mailboxes for the morning newspaper.
The inn – scaled like a subdivision and still under construction, which the reservations clerk neglected to mention – is managed by the PlumpJack Group, which was founded by Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco, the newly single heartthrob who is now Bachelor No. 1. The 80-foot-long infinity pool was situated idyllically on a hilltop with the restaurant and spa, stretched languorously toward verdant canopies heavy with grapes on the cusp of harvest.
Roger, who drove up separately to meet me for dinner, was already waiting on the porch of our private garden, outfitted with native plants and that pathetic accouterment of foggy Bay area summers, a heat lamp. Our bathroom, I was elated to find, had not only heated floors and a deep marble tub but also two showers: a glass-enclosed one with four gloriously aggressive nozzles, and – my longstanding fantasy – one outdoors, a folksy affair with corrugated metal walls and plank floors. Armed with Italian blood orange body wash, I luxuriated in princess-ness, the warm torrent pounding on tin as I soaked up the perfect Northern California sky, dreaming of barnyard animals.
Anticipating 24 hours of gluttony, I decided it would be a good idea to get some exercise. So, passing the $800-a-day stretch-limo drivers loading up on caffeine at the Oakville Grocery, I had begun my odyssey at the crack of dawn speeding from my home in Oakland to Calistoga for Sip ‘n’ Cycle, a $115-a-person biking tour of wineries operated by Getaway Adventures.
No sooner did I pull into the parking lot than Perry Mayfield, a former bike racer and Kitzbuhel ski instructor, spritzed my face with lavender aromatherapy. “Rejuvenation without caffeine!” he crowed, then proceeded to climb a tree.
Our two wine jocks, Perry and Randy, took us on a Tour de Napa, shunning Highway 29 in favor of quiet, European-feeling back roads. Enshrined in a Plexiglas case at the Chateau Montelena, a widely respected vineyard, was the exalted bottle of 1973 chardonnay that won the famous 1976 Judgment of Paris, in which two California wines outscored the French ones, thus precipitating the cult of Napa.
Feeling flush, I sprang for the exclusive $25 “estate tasting,” including one from a $130-a-bottle ’96 cabernet, which I brought from the somewhat sinister-feeling back room to share among my biking brethren. Later, across a dragon-green lake with swans and pagodas, we spied the balding head of Bo Barrett, Montelena’s esteemed winemaker – a celebrity sighting akin to finding Angelina and Brad eloping in Fiji.
At Zahtila Vineyards, situated on the Silverado Trail, where even the local landfill is Edenic, we learned that everyone in Napa is moving to Ashland, Ore. (50 acres for less than a million, it’s said). The tasting room had a ceramic porcelain spit bucket, a somewhat disgusting ritual Napa objet that is essentially a spittoon for wine snobs. Under the woozy influence of the Montelena cabernet, I bought a 2002 Zahtila cabernet for $50, which was later fetched and delivered by the Getaway Adventures van.
Sporting helmet hair, I visited St. Helena, arguably Napa’s toniest town, which, like its Hamptons soul sisters, is wrestling with its popularity among the riffraff. In recent years, the town has apoplectically tried to block the building of a station for the Wine Train, a “down valley” dining experience on rails that some fear would overrun the town with T-shirted fudge shoppers. Old-fashioned places like Taylor’s Refresher, a frozen-in-time drive-in with static-y loudspeakers, now commune with shops selling white chocolate koi (at $8 each a steal compared with a live koi that recently fetched $170,000 in Japan, a factoid you, too, would know if you read Auberge, the Auberge du Soleil’s glossy magazine).
At the campus store of Greystone, the West Coast outpost of the Culinary Institute of America, I lusted after a $499 set of six fluorescent Laguiole knives designed by the French architect Jean-Michel Wilmotte. But realizing I couldn’t afford dinner or a massage if I bought them, I became absorbed in the collection of 1,800 corkscrews obsessively amassed by the late Brother Timothy, who oversaw the Christian Brothers winery, which formerly occupied the brooding Addams Family-esque building.
The corkscrews, some no bigger than my pinky and vaguely inter-uterine-looking, were divided into bizarre subsets, like Cork Removers That Are Not Corkscrews (itself subdivided into Gas-Powered, Air-Powered and CO2 Powered). They were exhibited as if they were Thebian pre-Dynastic scarabs in the Egyptian wing of the Met – sacred amulets of the good life that is Napa.
Heading back to the inn to meet Roger, I was locked in a death grip of traffic on Highway 29 behind a Volvo with a “Life is a Cabernet” license plate holder. Then, we circled back to the Auberge for a drink and an appetizer ($63 for a shrimp cocktail and two glasses of wine) on the Auberge’s outdoor terrace, enveloped in pleasantness.
The sunset bathed the mountains in blue shadows, and a half moon rose over a huge pyramid housing the Opus One winery. Like Scarlett O’Hara vowing never to go hungry again, I vowed that the next time the gods gave me $1,000 to spend in Napa, I would hole up at the Auberge, even if it meant subsisting on acorns.
We barreled down Zinfandel Lane to Press, the restaurant jointly owned by Dean & DeLuca’s Leslie Rudd that specializes in Napa wines, from 240 wineries. Our waitress, Anne, had a Moonie-like intensity, and the wine list turned out to be a better read than People magazine, with insider tidbits about vintners like Frank Farrell, who still practices law and “burns up the highway between Napa and San Francisco.”
Ordering wine was a memorable experience. “Would you prefer wine from the mountains or the valley floor?” Anne said patiently. “There is more fruit north of Spring Street Mountain Road and more evergreen on Mount Veeder.” (We had a flash of a waitress in New York asking if we would prefer the boiled kosher frank from the Second Avenue Deli or the all-beef grilled one from the Nathan’s Famous at Surf and Stillwell on Coney Island.)
The chef’s “sourcing” page read as if written by William Least Heat Moon. We wanted it all – the Berkshire Heritage Pork from Iowa, the watercress from Sausalito Springs. Roger was presented with a steak knife that looked like Daniel Boone’s. My dish, Skeena River salmon, was not transcendent, but I was too transfixed by the next table to notice, where eight people were drinking six bottles of wine in 24 glasses.
“That’s Robert Foley, thank you!” said the all-knowing Anne, referring to the maker of a “very rustic full-bodied charbono.”
I won’t go into detail about the impossibly decadent Scharffen Berger chocolate soufflé, topper of our $130 dinner, but to say, I regretted it. We went to bed in a stupor. “The floor is at 81 degrees,” Roger muttered.
The monochromatic décor of our cottage felt soothing the next morning. It was finally time to indulge in the spa, where a sign at the front desk said, “Please ask us for complimentary horse cookies.”
The warm goat butter smelled slightly of lavender. The therapist, Arnela Guastucci, put a warm towel under my neck and started to knead my back. I was struck by the sound of the butter, which made sucking, slightly gloppy noises beneath her palms.
I was dimly aware of the rhythm of waves emanating from somewhere. Are the goats swimming? I wondered as I drifted off. Do they have life preservers? When it was over, I went to the rosemary-infused steam room, where my back melted into the tiles. I felt peaceful – basted actually.
I had planned to go to a museum, but bagged it for a swim. I had the sensation of swimming to the grapevines, which loomed on green and russet hills. I thought about the seductive harvest of the senses that is California as I sat in a whirlpool hidden from view, hawks flying overhead, the flicker of Mylar ribbons, to ward off birds, shimmering in the distance. I sank into blissful, buttery oblivion, my soul bleating.
Total spent: $999.85
PATRICIA LEIGH BROWN reports for The New York Times from San Francisco.
Correction: Sept. 18, 2005, Sunday:
A line is omitted on Page 13 of the Travel section today at the end of an article about visiting the Napa Valley inexpensively. It should read, “Total spent: $262.49.”
Low: Napa Valley on $250 a Day
September 18, 2005 Napa does not smile on the visitor who’s working with a Two-Buck Chuck budget. At the Napa Valley Redwood Inn, nearly $100 a night won’t get you a room with a view of Napa’s lion-colored hills and marching vines, much less a glimpse of redwoods. The “inn” is a clean, sage-colored motor lodge in the town of Napa, hard by Highway 29, the valley’s main drag. My room opens onto the parking lot. It reminds me of Miles’s in the movie “Sideways” and makes me melancholy in some undefined way. Not two hours in the valley and I’ve already blown more than half of my $250 two-day budget on rental car and lodging. Clearly, making a Napa trip feel extraordinary without testing credit limits is going to take some ingenuity. I’ve been told several times that newcomers to Napa and the winemaking process, like me, should kick off their visits with a tour of the Robert Mondavi’s Mission-style winery near Oakville, so my buddy Tan and I had reserved a $20 tour and tasting. The affable guide, Channing, an art teacher and winemaker, talks to us of the need to stress grapes and prune back vines to coax maximum flavor from the grapes. Usually, we’d head to the vineyard for a closer look, but it’s 95 degrees outside. The older members of our group look waxy. Channing herds us instead into the 58-degree winery. We visit the sepulcher-like barrel room (votive candles burning), then contemplate an intricate display of cork, and I wish for one of the more in-depth tours that talk about terroir and food pairing. The world brightens when Channing appears with four bottles of wine, including a moscato d’oro, an unctuous, peach-scented dessert wine, and pours samples. The tour conveniently ends at the gift shop where tour-takers get 15 percent off wine purchases. The ploy works. Rashly, I line up at the cashier with a bottle of $20 moscato, behind a man whose baseball cap reads, “Life Is a Cabernet.” Though a big chunk of Napa’s fun is visiting different wineries where it’s easy to plunk down $5 to $10 for tastings, one of the valley’s best deals isn’t at a winery at all. The $15 Taste Napa Downtown card gets its holders 10-cent wine tastings at 10 different tasting rooms and retail stores in the town of Napa, as well as discounts on purchases. The card, which can be bought at any of the participating stores, also grants free admission to Copia, Napa’s impressive museum of food and wine (which usually costs $12.50). That afternoon, we step up to the wine bar at Wineries of Napa Valley, next to the Napa Valley Conference and Visitors Bureau – the first of a few stops we’ll make with the card – and plunge our noses deeply into stemware holding wines from five smaller wineries, like Bourassa and Goosecross. The man who’s pouring introduces me to a white called viognier. (“The white for people who don’t like whites,” someone later describes it.) Tan tries a Dusinberre cabernet so thick he could eat it with a fork. When we’re done we offer dollar bills. He waves us off. Nobody, apparently, bothers to collect those dimes. Amount left: $66.70. There’s one more sample to try today – this time, a fleeting taste of the Good Life. In midsummer, my whole budget won’t rent the bathroom of the least-opulent room at Auberge du Soleil in Rutherford, a Relais & Chateaux property of tinkling waters and soothing colors among oaks a few hundred feet above the valley floor. Anyone, however, can have a drink on the resort’s deck. A valet parks our humble car. A soft-voiced attendant brings a plate of buttery olives. The bar menu has $80 Madeiras and a cigar page. I have a glass of wine, Tan has a $14 Meyer lemon drop cocktail – the price of admission to spend a restful hour looking out across rows of green vines as the sky drains from white-hot, to orange, to a cool blue that precedes the first stars. Before departing, I ask at the front desk if I can see more of the hotel. A polite, firm, “No.” I don’t have the money to go to Tra Vigne, the restaurant made famous by Michael Chiarello, the TV chef. So we head for the brick-oven pizzas of Pizzeria Tra Vigne, which Mr. Chiarello helped start several years ago. (He’s no longer involved with either.) On the patio, we eat nicely charred pizza with prosciutto and arugula from the wood-fired oven, and head to the hotel. Luckily for the lonesome few presidents who remain my wallet, Napa dies after dark. Luckily, too, the hotel serves a modest Continental breakfast – since the next morning I want to try to squeeze in one last indulgence, and can’t afford much else. In 1993, as a busboy/ski bum in Vail, Colo., I’d tried the Mondavi-de Rothschild collaboration Opus One. A genie couldn’t have been a more beautiful thing to emerge from a bottle. That one taste showed me what wine could be. I’ve never had it since; the 2001 vintage now sells for about $160 a bottle. But what about a tasting? Discreet black lettering on a pale pedestal is all that announces the Opus One Winery in Oakville. Down a long drive bordered by Mission olive trees lies the winery – half sunk in the earth, rosy-stoned, pharaonic. Bees buzz in the lavender bushes. We park in a spot vacated by a limousine. A tasting at Opus One is a single five-ounce pour of the current Bordeaux-style vintage … for $25. A sign says, no, you do not get to keep the Riedel glass. I swallow dryly, hand over a credit card and sneak an extra palate-clearing cracker when the attendant turns his back. Opus encourages visitors to wander with their investment. Tan and I head up to the shaded rooftop terrace. Somewhere, classical music plays. Overhead, two eagles turn in a slow circle, parenthesizing a patch of morning sky. The atmosphere is perfect for drinking expensive wine. And the wine? I swirl and smell a cup of berries. Tan tastes his: cherry liqueur, he says. Tastes again. Chocolate, he says. The wine isn’t the altering experience I remember – how could it be, when in the cellar of memory everything ages to perfection? But after 17 months in French oak barrels, it’s damn smooth. Amount left: 93 cents. Anticipating this moment, I had asked the front-desk clerk that morning about suggestions for a cash-strapped tourist. He’d produced several two-for-one tasting coupons. Now we sort through them. We take up the topic of Napa’s costliness with the young woman behind the cork at Domaine Chandon in Yountville during our flight of sparkling wines ($6 each with a twofer coupon). She reaches beneath the bar and hands us still more cards – this time for free tastings. (Many of the cards are valid only during the week, however.) “Go to St. Supéry,” she adds, like some Prohibition barmaid slipping us the password. “Tell Kent that Vickie sent you.” The rest of the day we drift from less-known winery to winery, floating on a raft of free coupons handed to us by pretty women at places like Esquisse in St. Helena, where the two working are more than glad on a slow and sweltering Wednesday afternoon to have someone to talk with about life in Napa, and about the virtues of viognier. Then they send us on our way loaded with still more coupons. When we grow hungry, we graze the free samples at Dean & DeLuca in St. Helena until shame finally drives me, unsated, to the impressive if overpriced cheese case across the street at the V. Sattui Winery, where still more free wine-tasting awaits. A baguette, a small bit of Urgelia cheese and some olives ($7.42) push me a little deeper into the red, as V. Sattui requires a purchase to sit under the shade of a pear tree in its picnic area. And I’m ready to sit. In 24 hours, at least 28 wines have crossed these lips. My palate isn’t exhausted; it’s pickled. Which is good, because my wallet has hit bottom. It’s ready to go on the wagon. Total spent: $262.49 |
Recent Comments