Month: February 2005


  • Howard Dean says he has a majority of votes on the Democratic National Committee. He spoke at a committee forum in New York City last month.


    From Ashes of ’04 Effort, Dean Reinvents Himself


    By TODD S. PURDUM





    WASHINGTON, Feb. 5 – A funny thing happened to Howard Dean on his way to becoming a losing footnote in the Democratic Party’s past: he gained a winning foothold on its future. So there he was at Café Milano, Georgetown’s power joint, buying a pounded veal paillard on Wednesday night for Terry McAuliffe, the man he is all but certain to succeed as party chairman next week.


    “A lot of people came by the table to congratulate him,” recalled Mr. McAuliffe, who said Dr. Dean had invited him to what became a three-hour dinner to discuss the party’s operations. “And he said, ‘No, no, not till the vote’s over.’ But I did tell him, ‘You are about to become a human fire hydrant. You will get blamed for every loss. You will get zero credit for any win.’ “


    Dr. Dean, the former governor of Vermont, is no stranger to blame. His presidential campaign flared, then flamed out over questions about his judgment, temperament and discipline, and he left the race without winning a single primary.


    Then, as now, some party elders worried that his tone was too sharp for a national spokesman, and then, as now, they tried to stop him. This time, he stopped them.


    He declined to be interviewed for this article, aides said, because he wants to avoid public comment before the Democratic National Committee’s vote for chairman next Saturday. But he has already succeeded in rewriting the first dependent clause of his obituary.


    At first, almost nobody in the Democratic establishment wanted Dr. Dean as chairman – not senators, congressmen or governors, most of whom looked askance at his insurgent presidential candidacy last year and tried to field their own candidates for party chairman this winter. Only the people – more precisely, a critical mass of the 447 members of the national committee – liked Dr. Dean. They are generally liberal state and local grassroots activists eager for a party leadership that will take on President Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress.


    By Friday, Dr. Dean said he had rounded up more than 240 votes on the committee, after a dogged courtship of cold calls to committee members and networking with longtime supporters. Two rivals, Simon Rosenberg, the head of the centrist New Democrat Network, and Donnie Fowler Jr., a party operative from South Carolina dropped out on Friday. His remaining opponent, former Representative Timothy J. Roemer of Indiana, does not claim support that is more than in the double digits.


    “I think how it happened is that people came to a judgment that he has national standing, he’s a strong spokesman, a proven fund-raiser,” said Harold M. Ickes, a longtime aide and friend to Hillary and Bill Clinton who considered running for chairman but endorsed Dr. Dean instead.


    “He understands the importance of rebuilding parties, and he can really connect with average people and bring them into the system,” Mr. Ickes said. “I think his biggest challenge is, will he understand that he’s no longer a governor or a presidential candidate, but that he is the head of the party, and as such he’ll have to consult very widely and represent many views.”


    So does he?


    “I think he understands it,” Mr. Ickes said. “But understanding something and changing long habits are two different things.”


    Already, the Democratic Congressional leaders, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California and Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, have tangled from a distance with Dr. Dean over who should take the lead in setting, and articulating, party policy on questions like cabinet nominations or Supreme Court vacancies. Republicans have been quick to mock him.


    But Dr. Dean has also won surprising converts, like Representative John P. Murtha, a hawkish Democrat from western Pennsylvania who disagrees with him on numerous issues but decided to endorse him after Dr. Dean called to ask for his support.


    “I just like the way he operates,” Mr. Murtha said. “I like what he’s saying as far as the organization goes. He believes in winning from the bottom up, and I’ve always believed that’s what we Democrats have to do, pay more attention to the individual districts we represent and then relate that to the leadership. He realizes how important the next midterm election is going to be.”


    Mr. Murtha also liked something else about Dr. Dean: “When I talked to him, he assured me he was not running for president.”


    Indeed, some prominent Democrats said that Dr. Dean’s proven skills on the campaign trail in 2003 – his ability to inspire voters and to raise money through small donations over the Internet – were desirable traits in a party chairman, while his proven deficits – a sometimes loose tongue and hot temper – mattered less for a partisan leader than for a president.


    “I think what people want in their party – I’m talking about grassroots activists – is someone who will fight, who is a proven, effective political communicator,” said David Wilhelm, a former chairman who was anything but a firebrand during President Bill Clinton’s first term. “In the age of the Internet, money flows from that, volunteers flow from that.”


    Mr. Wilhelm noted that “15 years ago, you might have thought, ‘Well, somebody like that will alienate the money people’ ” – the big donors who have traditionally served as the Democrats’ financial backbone. The paradox is that Dr. Dean himself has now become one of the party’s most important money people. Even after he dropped out of the presidential race last year, he helped raise about $3.5 million for Democrats around the country.


    On a moment’s notice, aides said, Dr. Dean managed to raise some $250,000 for Senator Tom Daschle’s unsuccessful re-election campaign in South Dakota, and a similar amount for one of the recounts in Washington State that eventually led to a narrow Democratic victory in the governor’s race there.


    “If you could boil it down, Dean is seen as a soldier’s general,” said Representative Jim McDermott of Washington, one of the comparatively few Congressional Democrats who supported Dr. Dean’s presidential bid. “He’s a guy who sleeps in the trenches with the troops.”


    “Howard Dean learned an awful lot in that short time he was in the presidential campaign,” Mr. McDermott added. “He made some mistakes. Nobody’s going to say he didn’t. But he learned a great deal.”


    One lesson some of Dr. Dean’s associates say he apparently learned in recent months was that he missed the spotlight. He considered whether he should just keep working with the grassroots organization Democracy for America that succeeded his campaign group, Dean for America.


    Joe Trippi, who helped shape his presidential campaign, urged him to run for the Senate from Vermont, or for president again.


    “I just never thought this was what he wanted to do,” said Mr. Trippi, who had supported Mr. Rosenberg for party chairman.


    But in the end, Dr. Dean came to believe “that he could have a greater impact” from inside the party organization, said his longtime media adviser, Steve McMahon, “even though it might be harder to get there.” Running for chairman then “became an interesting challenge,” Mr. McMahon said.


    As governor of Vermont, Dr. Dean headed the Democratic Governors’ Association as well as the National Governors Association, so he has experience running political trade groups. Aides say they expect him to commute to Washington from his home in Vermont, travel around the country on weekends as needed and take a hands-on approach as chairman.


    “People said to me it’s kind of remarkable the way he’s transformed himself from the guy that people remembered for the Iowa speech to the guy that people are looking to as leader of the party,” Mr. McMahon said. “Really, the only thing that happened is that he was able to sit down in various forums and be the Howard Dean that everybody was attracted to two years ago: the plain-spoken, blunt Democrat who wasn’t afraid to take a stand and state it bluntly.”




    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top


  • 45º, 90º, 180º/City,” 1980-1999. The pieces of Michael Heizer’s sculpture could be combined to make a wedge.

    Michael Heizer.


     


    Art’s Last, Lonely Cowboy


    By MICHAEL KIMMELMAN





    "You just don’t get it, do you? This is a czarist nation, a fascist state. They control everything. They tap my phone. They’ll do anything to stop me. We’re the front lines, man, fleas fighting a giant.”


    It is a clear, crisp, gorgeous winter afternoon in the high desert in Nevada, and Michael Heizer, who has spent the past 32 years and many millions of mostly other people’s dollars constructing ”City” — one of the biggest sculptures any modern artist has ever built, one and a quarter miles long and more than a quarter of a mile wide — is in a state of extreme agitation, even for him. His pique is rising as he maneuvers his truck down a bumpy mountain pass, filling the truck’s cabin with cigar smoke. I sense that he’s rather enjoying himself.


    We are driving through Murphy Gap. Pinyon and juniper cluster along the slopes on either side. This narrow, serpentine passage of astonishing beauty cuts through the Golden Gate Range, far from civilization. Aside from Heizer’s voice and the truck’s engine, there is an endless, empty, engulfing silence.


    Coal Valley, on the eastern side of the mountain range, is a desolate, flat plain of yellow rabbit brush and silver sage for grazing cattle. To the west, Heizer’s valley, Garden Valley, is vast and nearly uninhabited. Size is deceptive out here. ”City” looks from the edge of the valley like a low-lying bump, barely visible. When you drive just a mile from it, south across the valley, it basically disappears into the brush. But picture a sculpture the size of the Washington Mall, nearly from the steps of the Capitol to the Washington Monument, swallowing many of the museums on either side. That’s how big it is. Only once you’re inside do you see all the mounds, pits, passageways, plazas, ramps and terraced dirt, most of the sculpture having been dug below ground level, masked from outside by berms. The shapes echo the mountains. ”I’m not selling the view,” Heizer contradicts when I mention this. ”You can’t even see the landscape unless you’re standing at the edge of the sculpture.” True. Even so, the echoes are plain as day.


    We are maybe 30 miles from Nellis Air Force Base and the military’s supersecret Area 51, and more than 100 miles from Yucca Mountain, where the federal government, if all goes as planned, will begin to collect the nation’s nuclear waste in 2010. Trains will transport the waste from across the country, through the middle of Atlanta and Chicago and Salt Lake City and Kansas City, to Caliente, a town just north of here. From there, more than 300 miles of track will have to be laid, at a cost of more than $1 billion, to carry the waste the rest of the way.


    As it is currently conceived, the route will cut across Garden Valley, within ear- and eyeshot of Heizer’s sculpture and the ranch right next to it where he lives, a kind of survivalist compound of cinder block and solar panels, an oasis of cottonwoods and wild plum trees in the middle of a wide, empty plain. Having moved long ago to this virtual end of the earth, and having also moved heaven and earth to build in isolation his immense sculpture, Heizer now finds the federal government is plotting, as he sees things, to ruin it and him.


    Heizer knows it’s highly unlikely that he or anyone else will suddenly stop Yucca cold, but he says he’s hoping at least to persuade Department of Energy officials at this 11th hour to redirect the tracks next door through Coal Valley and Murphy Gap. Of course he is deeply pessimistic. ”I’ve always been a pessimist,” he tells me, ”but now I think things are going to get really, really bad.” Squinting into a fresh plume of cigar smoke, which rises like a dark cloud around him, he starts imagining first the rail, then wells, then electric power lines invading the valley, while ”sniveling toady” politicians, as he calls them, do nothing.


    His soliloquy crescendos, linking defense contractors like Kellogg Brown & Root and Bechtel to the government as a sinister cabal machinating against him — ”I wouldn’t be surprised if they sent out a hit squad to kill me!” — when the silence of Murphy Gap is suddenly shattered by a heart-stopping boom.


    An F-16 buzzes our truck. It looks as if it can’t be more than 100 feet overhead, turned sideways to maneuver low through the snaking pass. Then as quickly as it appears, it’s gone.


    Who knows? I think. Even paranoids may be right sometimes.


    This is a story about a man, his dream and a railroad. Everything in it is outsize, including the landscape. It’s otherwise a familiar Western saga, pitting a brooding, determined loner against big, bad Washington, except that in this case the hero’s personality is at least as radioactive as the train barreling toward him.


    At 60, with hawkish steel gray eyes, a kind of wary stare, a deeply lined face and haphazardly combed-over hair, Heizer is still gaunt from a decade-long battle with a neurological disorder that left him weak and in crippling pain. If illness reinforced his native martyr streak, it also strengthened his resolve, making the sculpture a mission. The knowledge that the government or his body or both could prove his work’s undoing makes him more fierce at the same time that he seems swallowed up in his clothes: dusty khakis, a checked vest over a plaid shirt, a sheepskin hat with earflaps and cowboy boots. He affects the look of other ranchers in this hardscrabble stretch of range, a resemblance that partly belies his upbringing.


    Born in Berkeley, Calif., Heizer comes from an accomplished family of academics, geologists and miners with some history in Nevada, a history that he’s proud of and that explains how he ended up making art here. During the 1960′s, sculpture moved outdoors, and Heizer was one of the movers. In the early 60′s, Claes Oldenburg, Carl Andre and Walter De Maria were digging holes or talking about digging holes, making performances out of the process. De Maria was imagining milelong parallel walls in the desert, and Robert Smithson was mapping the New Jersey landscape, visiting quarries, making ”Nonsites” out of rocks he collected and conceptualizing Earth Art, which became a catchall term for disparate experiments. It was an era of chest-thumping, clashing personalities, proclaiming to remake art from scratch, and Heizer fitted right in.


    His contribution was to go West. The Abstract Expressionists had linked American art with scale. Jackson Pollock’s paintings were said to refer to the Western landscape. Heizer took the idea to its logical next step. He literally made art out of the Western landscape, replacing scale with size: his works didn’t just allude to big things; they were enormous. The bigger the hole or ditch he dug, the more monumental the sculpture. Negative sculpture, as Heizer called art made out of the space left behind from digging, crept into the mainstream consciousness, even if many people have never heard of him. Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veterans Memorial and the memorial design for ground zero are both riffs, in part, on Heizer’s negative vocabulary.


    Adventuresome patrons and dealers like Robert Scull, Heiner Friedrich, Richard Bellamy, Virginia Dwan and Sam Wagstaff gravitated to the moody Westerner with the Ayn Rand vision and smoldering charm. They bankrolled his most radical art adventures. He dug holes in the Sierra Nevada, near Munich, Germany, and elsewhere; mostly the holes were shallow, the slopes gentle. But awe, even fear, was sometimes part of the work: the fear a viewer might feel about falling into one of the deeper holes. Heizer also scattered dyes and powders and drove a motorcycle to leave tire tracks, like drawings, across dry lake beds. He dug trenches, at intervals across hundreds of miles in the desert.


    His best-known work was ”Double Negative,” for which he cut a 1,500-foot-long, 50-foot-deep, 30-foot-wide gash onto facing slopes of the Mormon Mesa in Nevada by blasting and scraping away 240,000 tons of rock. It became a landmark of Earth Art, never mind that Heizer wanted nothing to do with any movement — or, increasingly, with most other artists. ”I burned hot and was making something totally original,” he recalled one afternoon while shuffling through some stacks of photographs of ”Double Negative” in his office. ”It was a moment of genius and unprecedented.”


    Then he couldn’t resist taking his usual gratuitous whack at Smithson, his former friend, whose ”Spiral Jetty” in Utah, finished just after ”Double Negative,” became an icon of Earth Art. Smithson, as Heizer sees it, ”just copied my M.O., did a complete heavy borrowing, an identity theft.” Smithson died in a plane crash in 1973. Over the years, most of Heizer’s friendships with artists he knew then have fallen away.


    In 1972, Heizer acquired land in Garden Valley and began work on the first part of ”City,” his own version of Easter Island or Angkor Wat: a modernist complex of abstract shapes — mounds, prismoids, ramps, pits — to be spread across the valley. It was to be experienced over time, in shifting weather, not from a single vantage point or from above but as an accumulation of impressions and views gathered by slowly walking through it. Artists in the 1960′s and 70′s — Donald Judd, Andre, De Maria, Smithson, others — were pushing sculpture off its pedestal. This was sculpture pushed all the way into the Western desert, the sort of work that you couldn’t buy or sell even though it was very expensive to produce. Its materials were dirt and rock and cement and rebar, not marble or porcelain or bronze, and its tools were not chisels but heavy machinery.


    The sculpture was meant not just to employ nature — the soil, sun and air — but also to make art out of engineering. Heizer traded in his paintbrush for a bulldozer, which, not incidentally, he could operate himself, unlike some of the other so-called Earth artists, but the work still required a crew. Artists have always had assistants. Heizer’s happened to be construction workers with cranes and forklifts.


    ”City,” in its vastness, was meant to synthesize ancient monuments, Minimalism and industrial technology. The work derived inspiration from Mississippian tumuli (ancient North American mounds), the ball court at Chichen Itza in the Yucatan and La Venta in southern Tabasco, where his father, a prominent anthropologist and archaeologist, had excavated. At the same time, it suggested airport runways and Modernist architecture.


    Heizer resists such strict comparisons, stressing his basic abstract impulses. ”The trouble is,” he explained to me, ”once you say something about a source, then you’ve pegged it down, and so now I’m reluctant to say anything. If I say I developed 50 different shapes from Mississippian tumuli, that doesn’t mean they’re copies of tumuli — I’m not ripping off those shapes. I said I derived some of the shapes from the serpent motif at Chichen Itza, and now I have to live with this forever, as if that’s the whole meaning behind it.” Years ago he told another interviewer, ”The only sources I felt were allowable were American; South American, Mesoamerican or North American. That might mean Eskimos or Peruvians. I wanted to finish off the European impulse.” Whatever its sources, in its ambition and idiosyncrasy, it is clearly a very eccentric, American vision.


    During the mid-1950′s, the National Academy of Sciences raised the question of what should be done with the country’s radioactive military waste. The academy proposed various underground sites around the country. Nevada wasn’t on the initial list.


    But Nevada was where the military had been exploding weapons, where fallout from atomic tests had drifted across mountains and valleys near Heizer’s ranch. Nevadans came to learn firsthand what it meant to live in the shadow of the blasts and to distrust what the government said. ”Part of my art,” Heizer explained when he picked Garden Valley, ”is based on an awareness that we live in a nuclear era. We’re probably living at the end of civilization.”


    In its remoteness and its intimation of eternal landscapes and ancient monuments, which survive after the societies that built them disappear, ”City” reflected this sentiment. At the same time, it was inspired, Heizer said, by what he calls the ceremonial city: ”Every old city has the same sort of ceremonial feature, whether it’s the Tuileries or St. Peter’s or Teotihuacan. The long, stretched-out format of my sculpture is in dialogue with this ancient way of formatting space.”


    Heizer also designed ”City” to blend into the contours of the valley and to act as a kind of bunker or container, open to the sky but dug into the earth, low to the ground (he admires Frank Lloyd Wright’s buildings) and, as much as possible, disguised from outside, so that the natural vista would be largely preserved.


    The military metaphor of the bunker, with its defensive aura, is hard to miss. When officials from the Department of Energy recently flew over the valley to survey the rail line, they reported briefly mistaking the sculpture for a military project. Years ago, Heizer compared the first part of ”City” — a sloped, flat-topped mound with projecting beams that he called Complex One — to a blast shield. He has since constructed pits and perimeter mounds, turning his work into a sort of airy, roaming fortress made of millions of yards of dirt, so many yards by now that he long ago lost count. ”My interest is in making this thing internalized,” he said while driving the two of us slowly across the sculpture late one afternoon as the setting sun turned the mountains orange and purple and cast the deepest pits in black shadows. ”It is connected to the environment but not to the landscape. Landscape to me is a planar thing, just a view. Environment is everything down to the ecosystem. Big difference.”


    Ten years after Heizer conceived ”City,” Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, which insisted that the Department of Energy find deep geological disposal sites — and also that the United States must permanently dispose of spent fuel from nuclear reactors, not reuse it, which meant that there would be less dangerous plutonium floating around in the world, but more waste to dispose of. After much political wrangling, three remote Western sites were recommended to President Reagan in 1986, one in eastern Washington State, near Hanford, where the U.S. had already built nuclear facilities for bombs; another in Deaf Smith County, Tex., near a secret plant for nuclear warheads.


    The third was Yucca, near Area 51, where the Air Force conducts its so-called black programs, testing its most secret weapons. This is a no-fly zone. Fighters escort out, or shoot down, any plane that strays into the area. The pilot who flew me by helicopter to Heizer’s ranch one stormy summer day last year was careful to check in with the Air Force controllers; still he kept one cautious eye on the horizon for lightning, the other out for military jets.


    Naturally, no state wanted to store nuclear waste. Nevada, during the mid-1980′s, was not in the best negotiating position. Las Vegas was still far from being the boomtown it would become. The state had only one congressman. So it wasn’t altogether surprising when in 1987 Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act, ordering the Department of Energy to focus exclusively on Yucca.


    By then, Heizer had reached an impasse on ”City.” He finished Complex One in 1974, mostly working by himself, using a paddle-wheel scraper a farmer lent him and following plans drawn up by seismic engineers; then he started on Complexes Two and Three, gargantuan mounds that proved to be vastly more troublesome. Combined, the three Complexes were meant to form a horseshoe, like a stadium open at one end, around a broad pit or plaza. Complex One had protruding, 30-ton, T-shaped and L-shaped columns; Complexes Two and Three were angular dirt mastabas, crystalline shapes, up to a quarter mile long, entailing hundreds of thousands of yards of dirt, one with pointed slabs, like ancient stelae, 70 feet high. ”A lot of money over the years went into simply trying to maintain old, useless equipment,” Heizer said. ”I never stopped working on the pit and the Complexes, whenever I could afford to. But we’re talking crazy optimism here.”


    He took commissions to raise money and kept revising the plans for ”City,” which he had never imagined to be a lifelong undertaking but which was clearly turning out to be one. Some help arrived during the late 1980′s when Charlie Wright, the director of the Dia Center for the Arts, visited with potential sponsors and provided cash to shore up what had already started to erode because of harsh weather and construction problems. Dia was founded in 1974 by Philippa de Menil and her husband, Heiner Friedrich, a charismatic but spendthrift German art dealer who sponsored Heizer’s Munich sculpture years before. Friedrich considered supporting Heizer at the start of ”City,” but the two fell out. Then Dia’s fortunes briefly collapsed. Wright, with fresh patronage, revived Friedrich’s original ambition to back all sorts of grand art projects, like Heizer’s.


    Then Heizer got sick. In 1995, he mistook pain in his fingers and toes for frostbite because he had been standing in the cold 12 hours a day working on his sculpture. ”I thought I was eternal,” Heizer told me one evening, relaxing after dinner in his living room, flexing his hands while staring absently at the Science Channel. ”I still do. But back then I took no care of myself. I hadn’t seen a doctor or a dentist for 20 years.” When the pain moved to his back, a medevac helicopter had to speed him to a doctor, who prescribed Tylenol and told him he was drinking and smoking too much. The pain became unbearable. On his way by plane to a hospital in New York, he collapsed and nearly died.


    Polyneuropathy was the diagnosis, a nerve disease that progressively caused him to lose much of the use of his hands. His weight plummeted. For a while he couldn’t walk, then he had to use crutches. He was in the hospital for months. His recovery was slow. Fed up, he resolved to demolish what he had done so far of ”City.” Meanwhile, Wright had been succeeded at Dia by Michael Govan, who picked up his plan to aid Heizer in 1996, cultivating more donors, above all the Lannan Foundation. Able to hire workers and rent heavy equipment at last, Heizer went back to work. Although still ailing, he finished the first Complexes by 1999, when I initially visited him — 27 years after he started. Unbowed, he declared there were another four, even grander, stages to go.


    If he’d never gotten to those, he would still have accomplished a feat on a scale not unlike, say, Mount Rushmore, which, along with the cowboy paintings of Charles Russell and Frederic Remington, is just about the only American art Heizer now volunteers to praise. Two Remington cowboy sculptures are on either end of the long table in his living room, and he keeps handy an old book of Russell’s paintings of the West. ”I love these artists because they’re so precise and faithful,” he says.


    I was flabbergasted when I returned last summer, after several years away, to see what Heizer had accomplished since my earlier visit. I couldn’t decipher the work at first, save for a few distinctive shapes. The sculpture melded with the valley. But then Heizer packed me into his truck and drove me to the sculpture, a quarter mile away from the ranch. The additions now dwarf the first phase of the project, making


    Complexes One, Two and Three, which are collectively nearly the size of Yankee Stadium, look tiny and precious. The new phases are more pneumatic — raked dirt formations resembling hills, valleys and mountains. There is a patch of unspoiled sage, like a park, smack in the middle, for flood runoff through the valley (Heizer was thrilled to discover that it actually worked during the recent January storms); and there’s now a concrete sculpture, ”45o, 90o, 180o,” which both evokes ancient Egypt and resembles a board game on the scale of an airport hangar. ”I call it a defracted gestalt,” Heizer said while slowly steering the truck to the steep precipice of what he calls Alpha mound. ”From the ground you grasp the size but can’t make out the shapes — the opposite of what you sense from the air — and your perception changes as you move around.”


    Heizer occasionally refers to the valley as virgin land; he obsesses about the originality of his conception, about protecting his property and his art from violation by the rail, from developers hunting for underground water, from people trying to sneak in to see the sculpture before it’s finished. His project is propelled by anger and resentment and monomania but also by Eros: sculpture as voluptuous, unspoiled and ecstatic, an organic body (one mound from the air, I saw, clearly resembles an erect phallus).


    The question, at a time when there’s so little talk about government financing for new art of any sort, is whether a country that claims to prize its rugged individualists and its native treasures, both natural and cultural, will care enough to try to avoid ”City” by running the nuclear train elsewhere — whether accommodations will be made simply to preserve a sculpture and the equally obscure, awesome valley it occupies.


    Obscure, in the art’s case, not just because it’s physically remote, but also because Heizer has frightened away almost everyone from seeing ”City.” He’s the opposite of Christo and Jeanne-Claude, whose ”Gates,” to be unveiled this week in Central Park in New York — another gigantic sculpture project decades in the making — is ephemeral. Christo and Jeanne-Claude regard the public spectacle of their installation as part of the work itself: the art is a kind of temporary performance. Only when ”City” is finished — Heizer predicts it could take another decade to complete the 15 miles of concrete curbs that delineate the mounds and shore up the dirt slopes — will the public be invited. Meanwhile, as he kept insisting to me while we were bumping down what sufficed for the path through Murphy Gap, anyone trying to show up uninvited will be arrested for trespassing or shot at.


    Before I visited him the first time, he interrupted a tirade on the telephone against critics and people he contemptuously called art tourists who want to make the rounds of Earth Art. Then I heard gunshots. When he got back to the phone, he said he’d had to shoot at some coyotes. Then he just picked up the tirade where he left off. In a narrow pass along the drive across the desert this time around, I noticed someone had crudely painted ”Mike’s Country Stay Out” on a rock. The only directional sign for 35 miles was pocked with bullet holes — used as target practice by ranchers, Heizer told me. It’s a message, he speculated. Like him, he said, they just want to be left alone.


    Heizer’s ranch is a three-hour drive north of two million people in Las Vegas, but it’s an hour’s drive from almost anyone. His driveway is an unmarked dirt road meandering across several empty valleys and mountain ranges, more than an hour from blacktop. He rarely leaves the ranch these days, and hardly anyone visits except the construction crew. Heizer’s Garden Valley is in Lincoln County, which, like half of Nevada, is a place where ranchers run cattle up-country during the spring and summer, down-country during the winter. This is mountainous range. Gold miners used to prospect here; there is still mining for opal and vermiculite.


    Heizer and his second wife, Mary Shanahan — a slender, friendly, brown-haired woman with a wry sense of humor, 21 years his junior, a painter, who was his assistant before they married — tend a small herd of cattle. They’re raising beefalo. They also grow alfalfa. Their house is simple, comfortable, a low two-story building with a big kitchen in front. Heizer fixed it up with hickory floors and fir beams. There’s a metal shop, a dog kennel, a bunkhouse for workers to sleep in overnight, pens for cattle and farming equipment scattered along with half-finished sculptures in the yard.


    Mary, although she’s from Michigan, is a Western classic, soft-spoken and steady. She can birth a calf, make plum jam, change a truck tire, help oversee the complicated accounting on the project, ride herd over construction workers and ranch hands, format the digital images of the sculpture on the computer, reprogram electronics for the testy solar panels and in her spare time retreat to a studio behind Heizer’s office and paint abstract pictures of an ethereal calm and Western light. She’s in charge of the herd. The plan is to keep expanding it, she said. She and Heizer live pretty much like many small-time ranchers in their elective isolation. He’s just the only guy around building the equivalent of the ancient pyramids in his front yard.


    Lincoln County is Mormon country, where ranching families go back to the 1800′s, people don’t like the government telling them what to do and outsiders are regarded with suspicion. It took a while for locals to get to know Heizer, who stayed to himself. His prickliness was always partly calculated: it kept away unwanted busybodies and skeptics while burnishing his reputation as art’s ornery outlaw. One evening I discovered Mary and Heizer laughing in the living room. She had come across some old letters that Robert Heizer, Michael’s father, had written to various people. They were rants, she said. Like father, like son, I surmised.


    When I initially visited Heizer, his pent-up frustration had made him extremely testy with what was then a laconic crew that had no experience constructing anything like ”City.” The dozen or so men who now work with him — several of whom trek hundreds of miles each week across the desert to accommodate Heizer’s sudden decisions to shift several hundred thousand yards of dirt a few inches this way or that — profess deep affection. He’s a perfectionist; they shrug.


    If Heizer, over the years, picked fights and lost allies, insisting, against common sense, he was the first, the only, the best artist around, clearly some people have stuck loyally by him. ”The people who really spend time with him love him,” says Michael Govan, who, along with Lynne Cooke, Dia’s longtime curator, visits maybe three or four times a year to check on the sculpture’s progress. ”Never a nickel gets spent on anything that’s not necessary,” Govan adds. ”If Mike weren’t managing the construction and we had used outside contractors, it would have cost double, I’m sure. He’s honorable.”


    The patrons Govan has enlisted — the Lannan Foundation, the Riggio family and the Brown Foundation, the same Browns, by the way, of the defense contractor Kellogg Brown, which Heizer said was scheming to bump him off — have stuck with a project that could cost nearly $25 million by the end. ”Mike does things how he wants,” says J. Patrick Lannan Jr., the foundation’s president. ”But it’s going to be a monumental gift to culture for generations to come.” Even Heizer is astonished: ”I told them they’re playing with fire. I’m an artist. I don’t work with drawings or models. This is a creative process. It’s an act of faith on their part.” When I traveled with Govan and Cooke to ”City” last summer, Govan mentioned that he had reread Irving Stone’s ”Agony and the Ecstasy.”


    Later he dug up a passage from the book and e-mailed it to me:


    ”During all these months the Pope kept insisting that Michelangelo complete his ceiling quickly, quickly! Then one day Julius climbed the ladder unannounced.


    ” ‘When will it be finished?’


    ” ‘When I have satisfied myself.’


    ” ‘Satisfied yourself in what? You have already taken four full years.’


    ” ‘In the matter of art, Holy Father.’


    ” ‘It is my pleasure that you finish it in a matter of days.’


    ” ‘It will be done, Holy Father, when it will be done.’ ”


    Heizer figures that when his own work is done, it will be there for anybody to see for centuries — that he’s building not for today but for the ages. It’s a perspective he came by naturally. His father was collaborating on a book about the transport of massive stones in antiquity when he died in 1979, at 64. An obituary by colleagues from the Berkeley anthropology department described Robert Heizer as ”a lone, work-addicted man whose prodigious production required rigid self-discipline.”


    Preserved in a file cabinet in Heizer’s office is a page from The San Francisco Chronicle, dated Dec. 17, 1941. It’s a picture of a slender, youngish Robert holding a box of 350-year-old rusty iron spikes that bound the oaken ribs of a sunken Spanish explorer ship. A 1946 newspaper cartoon of Robert is tucked in the same folder. He’s depicted as a bespectacled Indiana Jones in tie and tweed jacket, brandishing a skull before a pile of bones. Some of the mounds in ”City,” it occurs to me when I see the cartoon, are shaped like bones, and the stelae are a bit like the spikes.


    In front of Heizer’s house there is also a gigantic perforated sculpture resembling Swiss cheese. During the 1930′s, Robert Heizer discovered tiny perforated horns, shamanist objects, left behind by hunter-gatherers who lived beside a prehistoric lake in Nevada.


    Heizers have been in or around Nevada since the 1880′s. Heizer’s grandfather, Olaf, whose own father was chairman of Stanford’s physiology department, became the chief geologist for California. He conducted geological surveys in Sumatra and helped map Tennessee, Washington and California. (A family story, Heizer says, is that one of Olaf’s horses was used by Eadweard Muybridge for his stop-action photographs.) Ott F. Heizer, Heizer’s other grandfather, ran the largest tungsten mining operation in Nevada.


    Heizer recalls: ”I was taken out of school by my dad when I was 11 and lived in Mexico City, then later in Paris. I went with him to excavate in Bolivia and Peru. I never finished high school. I was a straight F student anyway. My father admitted to me later that he’d thought I would come to no good. It was tough for my parents because I hated school. I didn’t have many friends. I wasn’t a sports guy, a team player. The only sport I liked as I grew up was riding motorcycles, and you do that alone.”


    At 19, he briefly took a few art classes in San Francisco and started making geometric paintings, then moved to New York in 1966. He supported himself working for slumlords, lugging a compressor over the cobblestone streets in SoHo, hooking up a spray gun and painting a six-story building top to bottom (white in the rooms, brown in the stairwells) in a day. ”It was a hand-to-mouth existence, but I met a lot of artists that way,” he remembers. ”I met Walter De Maria painting his loft. If you wanted your loft painted for $60 in three hours, I was the guy to call.”


    His switch to sculpture in 1967 grew partly out of the geometric paintings he had been doing, which were shaped canvases. These served almost as diagrams for the sculptures he would make in the earth. Much of that first outdoor work was fleeting, almost provisional, the opposite of ”City.” In 1968, he was included in ”Earthworks,” the influential group show at Virginia Dwan’s gallery, and then in the Whitney Museum’s painting annual in 1969, where his contribution wasn’t strictly a painting but — and this helped in a small way to redefine photography — a huge photograph of a dye painting in the desert.


    ”When I met him he was 24,” Dwan recently told me, ”a young 24, sensitive and vulnerable. He has changed over the years, as a result of defending himself from attacks, real or imagined. I was flummoxed by the work. I couldn’t figure out this person who seemed to come from outer space, so I asked Walter De Maria, who said, ‘Yes, Virginia, he’s an original.’ So I knew this was someone to be reckoned with.”


    For ”Double Negative,” in 1969, Dwan gave Heizer money, sight unseen. Working partly with Dwan’s gallery director, John Weber, Heizer called her from Los Angeles one day to say it was done. A few years later, Dwan bought for Heizer the first parcels of property in Garden Valley, which he chose because the land was cheap, the soil and climate were right and not much of the rest of the valley could be homesteaded. ”When I visited at first Mike was living in a trailer and had a big young Mormon working for him,” Dwan recalls. The road in and out was a weedy livestock trail, which sometimes got so bad in winter that Heizer would be locked in for months, seeing only a couple of sheep trailers and an occasional pickup truck. Fearful of being robbed, he surrounded the place with cyclone fencing and left only at night to get back before dawn.


    Eventually he built himself a house out of cinder-block seconds. When Dwan finally saw the first Complexes, she cried. ”There he is in the middle of nowhere, without an art world to talk to, without a bar where he can go find friends for support, building something much larger than anyone has ever built, knowing he is going to be criticized for grandiosity, and yet going ahead and building what he must. That takes courage.”


    Heizer still commuted to New York and Los Angeles, doing commissions, networking. He liked the dinners at Odeon, the parties at Chateau Marmont with movie stars — until he decided he didn’t. ”They’re frivolous, I’m not,” he told me. ”You don’t control your own destiny in New York. It’s fine if you trust the system and agree to move along the street in an orderly fashion. But you can’t carry a weapon to protect yourself, even though it’s more dangerous there than here. I find it castrating.”


    It has been said that the early works Heizer and Smithson and De Maria and others did outdoors seemed like a fresh start, full of promise. Nancy Holt, the sculptor who was married to Smithson and who used to be close to Heizer, recalled traveling with the two men: ”To go outside into the landscape, that sense of liberation, just crossing the Hudson River, it was glorious. The mass media picked up quicker than the art media what was happening. This was when everyone was seeing the earth from outer space for the first time; ‘ecology’ was a new word. And when you look at the old photographs of us, you can see the joy in our faces.”


    That was then. Should the rail go through, Heizer now claims, he’ll dynamite ”City,” never mind that he is building it to be indestructible for thousands of years, or that the people giving him money aren’t likely to fork over another million or so dollars to destroy it and return the desert to its original condition. But with him, it has become all or nothing. Posterity isn’t the next generation; it’s a millennium. ”Double Negative” was ”the most incredible sculpture I’ve ever seen or done,” Heizer says. ”When I finished I laughed. I knew I’d done it. There was no precedent in the history of mankind.”


    And he did not just add his sensibility to radical art movements of the 60′s and 70′s. As he sees it, he single-handedly, without influence from any other living artist, started a ”revolution.” ”I’m self-entertaining,” he declares in another fervid soliloquy. ”My dialogue is with myself.”


    The sculptor Richard Serra, Heizer’s contemporary, who was an acquaintance of Heizer’s during the 60′s and whose own work sometimes now rivals Heizer’s in size, has said: ”Whoever tells you he dropped from heaven knows the opposite is equally true.” Serra hasn’t seen ”City,” but he told me that he could imagine ”the work may empower people in ways that don’t have to do with scale, in ways that we can’t foresee. Heizer’s stance is empowering because what artists do is individuate themselves, and this guy has done it to the nth degree.”



    Of course, Heizer is not really on his own in the desert, as the nuclear train proves. There was also the MX during the 80′s, he reminded me one morning. We were in his kitchen with Gracian Uhalde, his nearest neighbor, who has a ranch about 15 miles away and who works as a contractor on ”City.” We sat before cups of strong espresso that Heizer likes to serve in glass tumblers at the table his father built for him years ago out of mining timbers scavenged from some abandoned mine shafts in the Golden Gate Range. The MX plan was to crisscross Garden and other nearby valleys — Coal, Dry Lake, Delamar — with rail tracks leading to silos for moving around and hiding missiles. (”Peacekeepers,” as President Reagan called them.) Mary spread an MX map over the kitchen table. It showed the valleys as a checkerboard of rail lines. ”With the MX we won,” Uhalde said, meaning the government decided not to go through with it. ”Now they’re back at it.”


    When I found Uhalde working at ”City” later that same morning, he moseyed over, stomping his feet against the bitter cold, and slid a pinch of chewing tobacco into his cheek. In his early 50′s, he has a broad, well-creased face, partly hidden behind a huge white handlebar mustache. His faded overalls matched his light blue eyes. I noticed part of his left pinkie was missing. A calf-roping accident, he told me. Heizer calls him a cowboy, a small-time rancher, which to Heizer is a big compliment.


    ”People are here because we want to be here, because we’re attached to this place,” Uhalde said. ”You don’t come to Lincoln County to make it in the world.” Like Heizer, he has become outspoken against the Yucca rail plan, which he fears will destroy his cattle’s grazing land.


    ”My grandfather came from the French Pyrenees in the 1880′s — he was Basque — and at first he emigrated to Idaho as a sheepherder. At some point he was asked to take a herd of about 2,000 to Carson City. He didn’t speak a word of English. He told me he had been given a burro and a tent, and when a bear killed the burro, which he needed to carry the tent, he had to leave the tent behind. In return he got 400 sheep, and he settled in Ely, north of here, where there was a Basque community, a kind of subculture.”


    Uhalde went on: ”Now we have about 10,000 acres altogether, between the ranch here and one up north, and we farm about 150 acres for hay and have a couple thousand sheep plus 600 cows. We’ve been around for 100 years. I think the government figured they’d have no resistance in Garden Valley because no one lived here.”


    He handed me a palm-size square pamphlet titled ”Atomic Tests in Nevada,” which was printed in March 1957 by the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Uhalde had been carrying it around lately. It showed cartoons of bowlegged cowboys on the range, watching mushroom clouds rise over the mountains. Allowing that ”fallout can be inconvenient,” it provides helpful tips like opening windows to avoid shock waves, wearing sunglasses if staring at fireballs and brushing off clothing when covered with radioactive dust.


    ”I believe it was in 1962,” Uhalde continued, ”that they did a hydrogen test that looked to me like snow falling in the mountains, the fallout was so bad. My dad never trusted the government. So he and Joe Fallini, his closest neighbor then, who lived 60 miles away, bought a Geiger counter. Deer started showing up with burn patches. Joe’s cousin, a little boy, died of leukemia after that. There were dozens of test shots back in those days. We would try to figure out where the pink clouds were heading.


    ”Then in the late 80′s my sister started having symptoms. They thought at first she was epileptic. She was in college at the time. By ’92 she was diagnosed with a brain tumor. Around then I got a tumor growing in my bladder. We both applied for downwinders’ compensation. We got a total of $50,000.


    ”Now we say, just leave us alone and take your nuclear glow train through some other valley, along the highway or whatever. Just not here. Here you’ve got ranching — small-time, old-style ranching, with the valley as a natural, reusable resource — coexisting in peace with Mike’s project, a cultural monument. The rail will kill all that.”


    Heizer joined us in the freezing cold, and he piped in that there were even bigger threats from developers who want to tap the valley’s water table. ”The train is just part of the problem,” he said. ”Developers want to rape this place.” Railroad Valley, just next to Garden Valley, has oil wells and a refinery in it, Uhalde added.


    Is there oil in this valley? I asked.


    ”God, I hope not,” he said.



    At the end of 2003, the Department of Energy announced the proposed nuclear rail line to Yucca. The Bureau of Land Management, which controls public lands, meaning most of Garden Valley, issued what’s called a temporary segregation to reserve the rail route. Next will come an Environmental Impact Statement. When I called to ask about Heizer’s fate, Joe Davis, a spokesman for the Department of Energy, said simply that Dia had proposed various ”interesting alternatives we’re considering.” The department plans to issue a draft of what it calls the ”Rail Alignment Environmental Impact Statement” by late spring or early summer. After that come hearings and another chance for public response before the final E.I.S. is issued and the fate of the rail line is decided sometime early in fiscal year 2006, Davis said.


    ”We have several laws to comply with,” Gene Kolkman added. He is field manager for the B.L.M. in nearby Ely and oversees land withdrawal. If the rail line intersects free roaming area for wild horses, that will require modifications because the horses are protected by the Wild Horse and Burro Act. Ranchers must be compensated if the rail cuts off grazing lands and harms their livelihood. ”It’s very seldom that a project comes in, especially a controversial project like the Yucca Mountain railroad line, and that it ends up being authorized as it was originally configured,” Kolkman said.


    A former Energy Department consultant on Yucca who is rooting for Heizer’s plan to move the route to another valley (and so who asked not to be identified by name) nonetheless defended the selection of Yucca. No site is perfect, he said. But he acknowledged the problem of shipping the waste to Yucca. Spent fuel contains heavy metals, and they aren’t called heavy for nothing. They require massive rail containers for transport. Cement for constructing the storage site must also be carried to it, tons of cement, on the scale of Hoover Dam. This is to be one of the largest public work projects ever. The shortest route would skirt Las Vegas, but the more politically feasible path — and the one mapped by the Department of Energy — goes from Caliente through the middle of nowhere, which is to say, right through Michael Heizer’s front yard. Politics has trumped art, the consultant said, at least for the moment.



    Heizer disappeared from the living room where he retreated after dinner one evening and retrieved an old, crumbling children’s book. ”Mike Mulligan and His Steam Shovel,” the 1939 classic by Virginia Lee Burton, is about Mike Mulligan and his red steam shovel, Mary Anne. They quit the big city, frustrated because steam shovels were succeeded by electric and diesel shovels, and they find work in the countryside. In faraway Popperville, they dig a cellar for a new town hall but, in their haste, they forget to leave a way out. They end up entombed in the cellar, Mike as the janitor, Mary Anne as the furnace. Heizer says he loved the story so much as a boy that his mother used to call him Mike Mulligan.


    At the sculpture the next morning, while Heizer tinkered in his studio at the ranch, I spotted Jim Hicks hunched beside his truck with his coat collar turned up, cupping his hands against the freezing wind to light a cigarette and looking absently out from the rim above Pits 4 and 5, a nearly sheer drop of 50 feet. Hicks has the chapped lips and weathered face of a cowboy who has spent his life in the great Western outdoors. He has been working on ”City” for years. He told me he makes the daily commute across the mountains and the desert from Ely, two hours each way, to work 10-hour shifts on this project. ”I can’t sleep anyway, so why not drive?” he said, laughing. Like the other men, he enjoys working for Heizer.


    ”I’ve worked on an airport runway and on highways,” he said, ”where you’ve got big crews; the bosses flood the projects with equipment, nothing’s complicated, you know beforehand the shape and the curve or whatever. This is completely different, 180 degrees.”


    How so? I asked.


    He nodded toward Beta Mound, an immense, quarter-mile-long construction of dirt with sloping sides, a flat top and a rounded nose. Hicks pointed to the nose. ”I used an 16-foot blade on the grader and most of the time, to get that angle just right on the mound, only about one foot of the blade was scraping the ground.” He paused. ”I did that. Maybe you wouldn’t notice, but somebody will. And that will last hundreds of years.”


    When I came across Bill Harmon, who pours concrete for the curbs, he echoed what Hicks said about discovering, in the process of building ”City,” an American can-do ideal, the fine art of heavy construction. Harmon is from Ruby Valley, 230 miles north, and during the week he lives in a trailer at Uhalde’s ranch across the valley with six other guys working on the project, including his two sons, Clint and Bo.


    ”Mike is demanding,” he said. ”But that’s why things are as good as they are. I’ve worked in concrete all my life, and I’ve never had the time or money to do something to the best of my ability. Everything is hurry up. It’s about making money. That’s the American way. But here we have to produce something that has more to do with accuracy than I’ve ever been allowed even to imagine. This here is my chance to do the best I can. I travel over 400 miles a week just to be here. And my boys take pride in it, too. When it’s finished, I’ll be able to say, I had the chance to do that.”


    I asked him what he thinks the sculpture is about. ”It’s hard to explain,” he added. ”At the beginning I was lost. I can read a set of blueprints, but I had no idea what we were building. I could not see why we were doing this. I got stuck on the practical stuff — was this a stadium? Were we going to live in it? And then Mike wanted everything within a sixteenth of an inch, even on a concrete slab that was 78 feet by 240 feet.


    ”But gradually I got the idea. I can’t say exactly what it means now, but I know it has to do with history and with making something that will last. I’m not an artist, but I can tell you I’m real proud to be working on something like this.”


    Gracian Uhalde, whom I came across later, echoed that sentiment. ”It takes a while to get used to how Mike does things. But we admire him because he’s not afraid to be different. And we’re glad for him. It’s not too many people in life get to see their dream come true, is it?”



    I left at dawn the following day. Roaming antelope and coyote hunting for rabbits had made the dogs bark at night. Now a dozen cats huddled in the cold on the long wood table outside Heizer’s kitchen window. Heizer had risen early to say goodbye. He told me he was sleepless, fretting about some of the things he’d said. He didn’t want to hurt people’s feelings. He wanted to give credit to people like Virginia Dwan, John Weber, Robert Scull and Richard Bellamy, who had supported him, and to Mary and his former wife, Barbara. So much of Heizer’s hubris is bravado, I think — his not having enough people around to vent to, to talk back to him. And in the end the work, which possesses him and drives him and other people crazy, is the only thing that will count — if it isn’t spoiled by the nuclear rail line or if Heizer doesn’t blow it up first.


    He walked me to my rental car and kicked the tires. ”They’re crap,” he said. ”They’ll blow out if you hit a big rock, and then you’ll be stuck.” He reminded me to call when I reached the paved road, so that he’d know I got there.


    With that, I drove off, tires crunching in the cold gravel, as the first rays of sun hit the snow on the mountains, casting the valley in a pearly gray pool of winter light.




    Michael Kimmelman is the chief art critic for The New York Times.





    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top

     


    Michael Heiser


     


  • A collage of “The Gates,” which is to be unfurled on February 12 in Central Park.


    The artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude said Friday that the meaning of “The Gates” would be found by those who walked through it.






     




    February 12, 2005

    ‘The Gates’ Unfurling to High Hopes

    By RANDY KENNEDY





    With 45 television cameras in front of him and a view of bright orange vinyl gates stretching through Central Park behind him, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said yesterday that the city expected an infusion of $80 million in tourism and other spending by people flocking to see “The Gates,” the vast public art project by the artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude.


    Worldwide interest in the project was clear at the news conference at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, where journalists from more than 200 media outlets, including networks in Sweden, Mexico City and Tokyo and others as unusual as Bulgarian national television, crowded into the Temple of Dendur to hear the mayor and the two artists discuss the project, whose saffron-colored fabric panels will be unfurled this morning.


    For Mr. Bloomberg – who has reduced the city’s arts budget amid general cutbacks but has also emerged as the strongest promoter of public art at City Hall in decades – the event was a chance to bask in the glow of a near-perfect blockbuster project: one that comes at no cost to the city (the artists are paying for everything, including extra police officers) and that will attract thousands of art pilgrims to New York during a month when tourism is traditionally at its lowest.


    “With no ticket sales of any kind it’s impossible to predict exactly how big an impact ‘The Gates’ will have during its 16-day stay here,” Mr. Bloomberg said, “but based on attendance at similar events and other factors, the city’s Economic Development Corporation estimates that the project will generate more than $80 million in economic activity for our city.”


    The $20 million project was originally conceived by the artists in 1979 and was rejected by three mayoral administrations before Mr. Bloomberg’s, in part because of concerns about its cost and about damage to the park.


    The mayor, who first became interested in the notion of “The Gates” in 1995 as a trustee of the Central Park Conservancy, made light of the project’s long history yesterday, saying that it took Michelangelo four years to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel and Beethoven five years to write the Ninth Symphony. “Mere blinks of an eye,” he said, “compared to the time that it took to build the masterpiece that we are celebrating today.”


    “I can’t promise,” he added, “particularly since this is New York, that every single person will love ‘The Gates,’ but I guarantee that they will all talk about it.”


    “And that’s really what innovative, provocative art is supposed to do,” he added, as Jeanne-Claude and Christo sat next to him.


    Vince Davenport, the project’s engineer, said that teams of workers would be standing by in case any of the 16-foot-high gates broke or were pushed down, and that a gate could be replaced in less than an hour. But both he and Raymond W. Kelly, the police commissioner, said they did not anticipate many problems, from either vandals or the weather. Mr. Davenport said that teams would begin manually unfurling the fabric at 8:30 a.m. and that all of the panels should be released by about 11.


    Asked often yesterday to explain the meaning of the project, Christo and Jeanne-Claude emphasized that its meaning would have to be found by those who walked through the 7,500 gates, spread over 23 miles of walkways.


    “It has no purpose,” Jeanne-Claude said. “It is not a symbol. It is not a message. It is only a work of art.”


    But Christo explained that it related in some ways to the unrealized plans of Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux, the park’s designers, to place iron gates at many of the entrances to the park. He added that the fabric panels, which will blow and curve in the wind, are also meant to remind viewers of the park’s serpentine paths and the curves of the empty branches of the trees above them.


    After answering several questions, however, Christo became clearly frustrated by trying to explain his work and emphatically urged experience over rational inquiry. “This project is not involved with talk,” he said. “It is real physical space. You need to spend time walking in the cold air – sunny day, rainy day, even snow. It is not necessary to talk.”



    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top







  • The Buzz Log – Search Spikes and Trends addtomyyahoo




    Music on the Cutting Edge
    Friday February 11, 2005 6:00PM PT





    Scissor Sisters
    Scissor Sisters
    They’re not popular (yet) with the fickle tween crowd, but that might be a positive sign for the Scissor Sisters. When one teen starlet simply blends into another, it doesn’t bode well for career longevity. Although Britney and Jessica’s pop-lovin’ fans aren’t ready to cut a rug with the Sisters, the band is developing a solid fanbase, with searches spread evenly throughout the 21-44 age group. Snagging three awards in the international category at Wednesday’s Brit Awards, the Scissor Sisters (+219%) are looking sharp in searches. The fivesome hail from New York, but sometimes home is the last stop on the road to fame, and America is just starting warming to the wily charms of this eclectic act. Searches from Yahoo! UK show the band firmly in the top 1,000 searches in that country and up another 18% over the past week. The flamboyant band also topped the UK album sales chart in 2004, capping a rousing string of successes in Great Britain. Although they found favor across the pond first, some cities in America would welcome the Scissor Sisters disco rock with a fresh-cut edge, with Seattle, San Diego, and Minneapolis topping the list of metros searching on the combo. Will they find their audience in the States or will their success get lost in translation? Only the Buzz knows…





  • Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles at Windsor Thursday.


    Charles Calls End to the Affair: He’ll Happily Wed His Camilla


    By SARAH LYALL





    LONDON, Feb. 10 – They have been friends for more than 30 years and lovers for most of that time. They have survived marriages to and divorces from other people; the icy disapproval of relatives; the resentment of the public; and, perhaps most excruciating of all, the publication of intimate details of their risqué pillow talk.


    But now Charles, the Prince of Wales, and Camilla Parker Bowles, whose love affair is said to have begun when she cheekily declared, “My great-grandmother was your great-great-grandfather’s mistress, so how about it?,” are to take the most radical and surprising step of their long, star-crossed romance. They are getting married.


    The wedding is to take place on April 8 in a civil ceremony at Windsor Castle, Charles announced on Thursday, but the 57-year-old bride will not become the Princess of Wales – that position having already been more than filled by the prince’s late and much-remembered former wife, Diana. Instead, Mrs. Parker Bowles will be known as Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cornwall.


    Nor will she be crowned queen. In a move that addresses one of the thorniest issues surrounding the marriage, Mrs. Parker Bowles will become the princess consort if Charles, 56, succeeds his mother on the throne. It will be the first time in the history of the English monarchy that such a title has been used, according to Vernon Bogdanor, professor of politics at Oxford University, and the first time an English king’s wife has not been queen. (Queen Victoria did have Albert as prince consort.)


    The announcement gives official status for the first time to Mrs. Parker Bowles, who has been living in an uneasy purgatory – part of the prince’s life, but bound by royal custom and social protocol to be an unequal partner. Although in recent years the two have appeared more often together in public, their murky status has put her in a difficult and oddly anachronistic position.


    In earlier eras, of course, royals were not allowed to marry divorced people. In 1936, Edward VIII renounced the throne rather than give up Wallis Simpson, a divorced American. In 1955, Prince Charles’s aunt, Princess Margaret, broke off a relationship with a divorced man rather than relinquish her royal status and all its perks.


    But in a sign of how much things have changed, this time Queen Elizabeth gave her permission for, and blessing to, the engagement of her divorced son to his divorced lover. Saying that she and her husband, Charles’s father, were “very happy,” she ordered that the Round Tower at Windsor Castle be lit in celebration.


    The queen has not always appeared to be Mrs. Parker Bowles’s biggest fan. Although Charles has for some time been openly living with Camilla, his mother has very rarely entertained the two of them as a couple and indeed seemed intent on distancing herself from the relationship. But the two met in 2000, and on Thursday the queen said that “we have given them our warmest good wishes for their future together.”


    In their own statement, the prince’s two sons, Prince Harry and Prince William, said, “We are both very happy for our father and Camilla and we wish them all the luck in the future.”


    While the majority of respondents in several snap public opinion polls in Britain on Thursday said they disapproved of the engagement, crowds of well-wishers cheered Prince Charles during a public appearance in London, and politicians rushed to congratulate the couple. Even officials of the Church of England, which until 2002 did not even allow divorced people to marry in church, have come around to the idea that Charles and Camilla would be better off married than not. The question has been complicated by the fact that if he becomes king, Charles will also become supreme governor of the church.


    The archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev. Rowan Williams, said he was pleased at Charles and Camilla’s decision “to take this important step.” After the civil wedding ceremony, he has agreed to lead a service “of prayer and dedication” at St. George’s Chapel in Windsor.


    In a world of expendable relationships, where middle-aged men trade in middle-aged women for younger, firmer models as easily as they might dispose of a creaky toaster or last year’s car, the enduring relationship of Charles and Camilla, as the newspapers call them, carries a sweet poignancy for many.


    Although in recent years she has had something of an image makeover, appearing more in couture dresses and less in frumpy countrywoman garb, Mrs. Parker Bowles can hardly be called glamorous and does not appear to care. She once called herself “your devoted old bag” in a love letter to Prince Charles.


    Even those unable to forgive Charles for cheating on the Princess of Wales can take a certain comfort in knowing that if he had to do it, at least he took the counterintuitive route, choosing someone older, wrinklier and less svelte than his wife.


    It has always been clear that Charles and Camilla truly like each other. They share a passion for hunting, fishing and other outdoor sports. They have bawdy senses of humor. More than that, it seems, the fun-loving Camilla is relatively uncomplicated (at least compared with Diana) and has been stolidly supportive of Prince Charles over the years, despite all the angst the relationship has put her through.


    The Prince of Wales and Camilla Shand, as she was then, hit it off from the first time they met, at a polo match in 1970. But Charles was something of a playboy, and when he dithered and went abroad with the navy, Camilla married a longtime suitor, Andrew Parker Bowles. The two remained friends with the prince. Mr. Parker Bowles even took on the ludicrously named ceremonial post of Silver Stick in Waiting to the prince, while his wife took another traditional role – that of the prince’s mistress.


    Meanwhile, Charles married Lady Diana Spencer, a coltish 19-year-old who captivated the world – but not her husband – with her demure good looks and blue-eyed charisma. The two were spectacularly ill suited for each other and, sunk by rancor and poor behavior on both sides, the marriage fell part.


    Although Charles later said he took up again with Camilla only when his marriage broke down, Diana contended that “there were three people in the marriage, so it was quite crowded.” She reportedly called Camilla “the Rottweiler,” while Camilla reportedly referred to her as “that ridiculous creature.”


    It was Camilla Charles loved, and when he and Diana divorced in 1996, it seemed that finally the couple could stop sneaking around. But in the national convulsion of grief after Diana’s horrific death from a car accident in Paris in 1997, public opinion turned viciously against Mrs. Parker Bowles. At one point, irate shoppers pelted her with bread rolls in her local grocery store.


    It was not until 1999, at a party in Piccadilly, that the two appeared publicly together, an orchestrated event in which Mrs. Parker Bowles walked well behind the prince.


    The two were together on Thursday night at a formal dinner in Windsor Palace. In contrast to his first post-engagement appearance with Diana, in which he answered a question about whether he loved her by smirking and saying “whatever ‘love’ means,” Charles seemed positively ebullient this time around.


    Flashing her enormous diamond engagement ring, a royal heirloom, Mrs. Parker Bowles had the glow of a teenager at the prom. “I’m just coming down to earth,” she said.




    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top


  • Friday, February 11, 2005
    Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal


    A quarter to cheer for Caesars


    Caesars Palace performance helps parent company boost profits


    By HOWARD STUTZ
    REVIEW-JOURNAL




    Strip casinos controlled by Caesars Entertainment, primarily the flagship Caesars Palace, propelled the company’s earnings in 2004 and helped the soon-to-be-purchased casino operator to increases in net revenues for both the fourth quarter and the full year, executives said Thursday.


    Caesars said its 27 casinos worldwide brought in $1.01 billion during the three months ended Dec. 31, an increase of 6.5 percent over the $946 million reported in the fourth quarter of 2003.


    The fourth quarter turned profitable for Caesars, with the company earning a net income of $20 million, or 6 cents per diluted share, compared with a loss of $17 million, or a loss of 28 cents per share, in fourth quarter of 2003.


    For the year, Caesars earned 69 cents per diluted share, up from 42 cents per diluted share in 2003.


    Analysts surveyed by Thomson First Call had forecast full-year earnings of 71 cents per share for the year.


    The company reported net revenues of $4.21 billion in 2004, a 6.7 percent increase over 2003′s net revenues of $3.95 billion.


    During a Thursday conference call, Caesars executives painted a rosy picture of the company’s future earnings as it nears completion of its $9.4 billion buyout by Harrah’s Entertainment. Executives said they wouldn’t discuss the transaction during the call and deflected all questions.


    However, Caesars announced its shareholders would vote on the transaction during a special stockholders meeting on March 11. The companies hope to close the transaction by the end of June.


    The results also included expenses of $16 million related to the acquisition by Harrah’s.


    JP Morgan gaming analyst Harry Curtis said in an investor’s note that Caesars results will give a boost to Harrah’s. Curtis said Harrah’s should improve cash flow at the Caesars-controlled properties.


    “We believe flow through under Harrah’s management can improve as the company focuses on implementing slot marketing programs as well as rationalizing costs,” Curtis wrote.


    Caesars stock was relatively untouched Thursday, closing at $20.35, up 6 cents or 0.3 percent. Harrah’s shares fell 35 cents, or 0.52 percent, to close at $67.47.


    Net revenue of $480 million in the fourth quarter and $1.94 billion for 2004 from Caesars’ six Nevada properties (excluding Caesars Tahoe which the company has agreed to sell for $45 million and was reported as “discontinued operations”) was 46 percent of the company’s overall figure.


    Caesars Palace was the company’s driving force as net revenue in the quarter rose 39 percent to $167 million from $120 million in the fourth quarter of 2003. The casino’s gaming win jumped 48 percent, the result of a 9 percent increase in table game volume and a 13 percent increase in slot volume. The property also reported its highest cash room rate in history — $162 per night.


    “At Caesars Palace, we are reaping additional and unique benefits from major capital development projects we have completed in the past few years, including The Colosseum and The Roman Plaza at Caesars Palace, and the efficiency-enhancing technology tools we are deploying in our casinos, our hotels, our lounges and our restaurants,” Caesars Entertainment President and Chief Executive Officer Wally Barr said in a statement. “Because of what we have put in place already, along with the planned opening of the new room tower at Caesars Palace, 2005 is looking like a very good year for us.”


    Other Caesars Strip properties reported quarter over quarter increases; Paris Las Vegas had net revenues of $104 million in the quarter, up from $98 million the year before; Bally’s Las Vegas had net revenues of $72 million, up from $71 million; and the Flamingo Las Vegas had net revenues of $83 million, up from $72 million the year before.


    “The strong performance of our Las Vegas resorts and better-than-expected results in Atlantic City drove record earnings in the fourth quarter,” Barr said. “Las Vegas is one of the hottest tourist destination resorts in the nation right now — and the entire industry is benefiting.”


    Net revenues from Caesars Atlantic City properties was $240 million. Barr said the 34-day strike by members of the Local 54 Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union probably cost the company $10 million in lost revenue during October.












     
     







     
    Find this article at:
    http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Feb-11-Fri-2005/business/25846510.html



  • The Waiter You Stiffed Has Not Forgotten


    By JULIA MOSKIN





    WHAT evil lurks in the hearts of waiters? Now you can find out. But can you stomach the results?


    An anonymous New York waiter wrote online recently: “In my fantasy, I become Darth Vader the next time a customer asks about the wines by the glass, then says, ‘Merlot! Waiter, haven’t you seen the movie “Sideways”?’ Then I will slice off his head with my light saber.”


    Grievances, including friction between kitchen and dining room staff, rapacious management and near-universal bitterness over tipping, are being revealed with gusto on the Internet by restaurant staff members. As a customer, to read Web sites like www.bitterwaitress.com, www.waiterrant.blogspot.com and www.webfoodpros.com is to wonder nervously, “Could they be talking about me?”


    Each month, www.stainedapron.com publishes a new extreme example of customer obnoxiousness. (One forum is titled “Keep Your Brats at Home!”) On bitterwaitress.com, the most popular page is an annotated database of people who give bad tips (defined on the site as “any gratuity under 17 percent for service which one’s peers would judge as adequate or better”). Anyone can add a name to the database, along with the location, restaurant, amount of the check, amount of the tip and any details, most of which cannot be printed in a family newspaper. (A disclaimer reads: “We are not responsible for submissions. Uh-uh, no way, not in the least.”) There are almost 700 entries.


    “That stuff is childish,” said Timothy Banning, a California chef who often posts to www.ontherail.com, a San Francisco-based site for chefs. “And it makes the industry look bad.”


    But most servers say that letting off steam helps them do the job. “It’s so important for us to have a place to vent,” said Becky Donohue, who waits on tables at Mickey Mantle’s in Midtown and writes occasional posts at www.girlcomic.net. “It’s amazing that more waiters don’t kill people,” she said.


    Many in the industry protest that the rage-filled, often incoherent blogs and posts don’t represent the feelings of most restaurant staff members, And so far only a small slice of the industry is active online. “Unlike a lot of people, chefs and waiters don’t have computer access at work, or enough time to fool around on the Net,” said Bryce Lindholm, a Seattle chef and manager who participates in a Yahoo discussion group for restaurant employees.


    But the result of these forums, say Mr. Banning, Mr. Lindholm and others, is that the symbolic wall between the kitchen and the dining room – the wall that prevents customers from knowing what is done and said by waiters and cooks – is coming down. And how do they loathe us, the customers? Now we can count the ways.


    “I don’t think civilians really have any idea how the staff really feels: namely, that they just can’t wait to turn the table, get their tip and see the back of you,” Mr. Lindholm said. “Let’s be honest.”


    Referring to restaurant customers as civilians is common, and indicative of the siege mentality that longtime cooks and severs tend to adopt. “I’d say waiting tables is one of the most stressful jobs you can have, short of being a firefighter or an inner-city police officer,” said Bruce Griffin Henderson, a singer-songwriter who did 10 years as a waiter in New York. “You have no control over anything, but you are responsible for everything. You are always being squeezed by three immutable forces: the customer, the kitchen and the management.”


    But recent interviews revealed some fresh irritants for the more than eight million Americans who worked in restaurants in 2002 (the most recent year for which figures are available according to the United States Department of Labor). Waiters must now enforce bans on smoking, drinking by minors and cellphone use, and are enduring an influx of Euro-rich tourists who, restaurant staff members say, often pretend not to understand American tipping practices.


    Chefs say they are being driven mad by an ever-changing spectrum of diets, allergies and food issues. Gillian Clark, the chef at Colorado Kitchen in Washington, contributed thousands of words to a forum at www.washingtonpost.com on the subject of customers who demand changes to the menu. “I explain to them that they are in my restaurant,” she wrote, “and they must have the flounder the way I make it.”


    Ms. Clark is relatively tolerant of customers with genuine health problems, but many bloggers reserve their most towering rages for customers with real or imagined dietary restrictions. Last year a server at a Sizzler steakhouse in Norco, Calif., was arrested after a fight with Atkins-dieting customers over whether vegetables could be substituted for potatoes. Participants in online forums reacted with understanding, though the consensus was that Jonathan Voeltner, the server, had gone too far in following the customers and covering their house with maple syrup, flour and instant mashed potatoes. “Use the forum, dude!” one poster urged. “Blow off the steam here.”


    According to www.waitersworld.com, one Washington restaurant customer recently insisted that the restaurant’s $10 minimum should be waived for him, because gastric bypass surgery had rendered him unable to swallow more than a few mouthfuls at one sitting. “So why are you in a restaurant?” wrote one cook. “WHY WHY WHY?”


    These writers are immoderate in their rages, but they do not discriminate. They harbor contempt for tourists, New Yorkers, Southerners, Jews, Christians, women, men, blacks, whites, American Indians. Fat people. Thin people. “My greatest dream is to keep a party of doctors waiting for 45 minutes,” Mr. Lindholm said. “They are arrogant as customers, and besides, they keep me waiting in their offices. Let them wait in my restaurant.”


    Serious complaints about sexism, racism, drug use, hazing and management are common, but the servers’ greatest source of rage is, of course, tipping. “It’s the only job where your hourly wage is totally dependent on how random people feel about you,” Ms. Donohue said. “How many times have you gotten bad service at Kinko’s? Do you get to dock their pay?”


    The vengefulness of the posts, and the recurrence of anecdotes that involve adding foreign fluids to customers’ food, from breast milk to laxatives, is enough to turn anyone who dares to enter a restaurant into a nervous, toadying wreck. Jesse Elizondo, a waiter who has worked in New York restaurants for 10 years, says that’s because customers generally forget how vulnerable they are to the good will of servers. “I can never understand why anyone would be even the slightest bit rude to someone who is about to touch your food,” he said.


    Mr. Elizondo said he discovered the forums after a bad night at work on Restaurant Row, when he went home and typed “waiter” and “revenge” into an Internet search engine. He is amazed by the challenges that customers bring into the dining room, he said, adding: “The cellphones are a big problem for us. And you wouldn’t believe how many people think they can bring their own liquor, or keep their big plastic water bottle on the table. I try to assume that people just don’t know any better, but sometimes it’s impossible, especially with the Europeans who act so sophisticated when it’s time to order the wine but so ignorant when it’s time to tip the waiter.”


    Online venting has become a vigorous art form for many servers, especially those who are waiting on tables to finance careers as writers or performers. “Where else can you observe human nature at its worst, night after night?” Ms. Donohue, a comedian, said. “The whole system seems to invite bad behavior.”


    Rima Maamari worked her way through college at a Toronto steakhouse, and said that she never intended to write about waitressing when she joined a blogging circle for writers. But, she said, “everyone was so interested in reading about the stuff going on behind a waiter’s poker face” that her reports from the front became her only subject. “People feel very strongly about this stuff, and not only waiters,” she said. “I got a lot of bitter e-mails from people about how they shouldn’t have to tip for bad service.” One customer, an ex-waiter, wrote on www.bitterwaitress.com, “You people should QUIT WHINING or get another job.”


    Aline Steiner, a customer who was working online at the East Village cafe Teany last week, said she had visited some of these sites, including www.shamelessrestaurants.com, a controversial New York-based site where employees post anonymously with complaints about their employers.


    “I think that as long as it’s anonymous, there is no validity, and no harm done,” she said. “But if they really want things to change, all of these issues are going to have to come out somehow. People want to be aware of how their vegetables are grown, how their chickens are killed. They should be aware of how restaurants work.”




    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top

  •   today’s papers
    Bill of (Few) Rights
    By Eric Umansky
    Posted Thursday, Feb. 10, 2005, at 12:51 AM PT


    The Los Angeles Times‘ top non-local spot goes to the House about pass a bill that would stop states from giving illegal aliens driver’s licenses, make asylum claims harder, and mandate that the secretary of Homeland Security “waive all laws” (LAT) in order to expedite construction of border fences. The bill’s slim chances in the Senate have improved after the White House endorsed it. The Washington Post leads with a Pentagon investigation that “generally confirms” Gitmo detainees’ complaints that female interrogators sexually harassed them. That included things like touching the detainees suggestively, making sexually explicit remarks, and smearing some with fake menstrual blood. A former Gitmo translator has also written a book detailing the treatment. The Post notes that the investigation only began in January, after the ACLU uncovered FBI memos complaining about Gitmo abuses.


    The New York Times leads with Hewlett-Packard’s board pink-slipping once-celebrated CEO Carleton Fiorina. The NYT cites her “personality and management style.” The Wall Street Journal, which tops its biz box with Fiorina’s fall, quotes a psychologist who has a name for it: “productive narcissist.” The Journal says Fiorina’s P.N. style used to be lauded. USA Today leads with the apparent proliferation of state laws giving perks, such as tax breaks, to soldiers on active duty.


    The NYT off-leads a previously undisclosed 9/11 commission report showing that the FAA had lots of vague warnings about al-Qaida in the months before the attack but didn’t do anything to ramp up security. Senior agency officials “were basically unaware of the threat,” says the report. The Times says the White House “blocked” the release of the report for five months. The NYT gets all excited in the first paragraph, saying some of the intel reports “specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations.” Skip down to 11th paragraph for the caveat: The report “finds no evidence that the government had specific warning of a domestic attack.”


    As the Journal flags up high, Iraqi officials announced that the final vote count, which was expected today, will be delayed for a bit as 300 apparently tampered-with ballot boxes are recounted. “This will lead to a little postponement in announcing the results,” said one official.


    Also yesterday, an Iraqi journalist for a U.S.-sponsored TV station was killed along with his 3-year-old son. A Housing ministry official was also assassinated as were three members of a Kurdish party. And the military announced the deaths of four more soldiers. According to early morning reports, a car bomb in central Baghdad killed at least three.


    Asked to assess the counter-insurgency effort, one “senior U.S. Embassy official” in Baghdad told the Post the most optimistic scenario is a political solution that would make the insurgents “less and less effective. And then it will still take you years.”


    The NYT teases a fascinating profile of Adel Abdul Mahdi, a leading candidate to become Iraq’s next prime minister. Mahdi is relatively secular and considered a U.S. favorite, but there’s also concern he could be a front man for more religious types. Mahdi also had interesting “boyhood playmates”: Ahmed Chalabi and Iyad Allawi.


    The Post fronts a survey on Social Security and concludes Americans don’t know jack. The “serious misunderstandings” range from underestimating the share of the budget spent on the program to believing that the president’s plan would “protect people from losing retirement money they invested.” (The poll itself also shows respondents spot-on with plenty of questions. See pages 16-17.) Meanwhile, 70 percent said Social Security will go bankrupt, and only about 25 percent said it’s in crisis.


    A slightly confusing story inside the Journal says that as part of a “peace deal,” Pakistan’s military paid tribal leaders about $800,000, which the tribal chiefs would in turn use to pay back money al-Qaida had given them. One general also said the military is considering pulling out of the tribal areas so long as “militants abided by the peace deal and not use the region to carry out attacks in Afghanistan.”


    The Post fronts new Pentagon personnel rules similar to those just introduced at Homeland Security: Raises will be based largely on performance than longevity. And the Pentagon will use an in-house board to deal with labor-management issues, “shrinking the role” of the current independent board.


    The papers mention the administration tripling its tsunami-aid pledge to $950 million. The Post says in the seventh paragraph that some of the money may be used to “reimburse the Defense Department” for its post-tsunami work.


    The NYT mentions NASA scientists concluding that last year was the fourth-warmest on record. Two of the three hotter years were 2002 and 2003. The other was 1998. The overall rise, one of the lead researchers explained, is “due primarily to increasing greenhouse gases.”


    The LAT and NYT front Saudi Arabia’s first national-level elections, which begin today. Though registration has been “sluggish,” the papers say there is some excitement among Saudis. And a tiny bit of skepticism. The elections are only for municipal councils, whose power hasn’t been clarified. Half of the seats will be filled by government appointees. Women, of course, can’t vote. And oh, political parties are still outlawed.

    Eric Umansky writes “Today’s Papers” for Slate. He can be reached at todayspapers@hotmail.com.

    Article URL: http://slate.msn.com/id/2113342/ if (window.print) { window.print() } else alert(‘To print his page press Ctrl-P on your keyboard nor choose print from your browser or device after clicking OK’);

  •   today’s papers
    A Nu Deal
    By Eric Umansky
    Posted Wednesday, Feb. 9, 2005, at 12:29 AM PT


    The New York Times, Wall Street Journal world-wide newsbox, and Los Angeles Times lead with the conditional truce declared by Israeli Prime Minister Sharon and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. The Washington Post fronts the handshakes, but the paper’s top story goes to budget numbers showing the Medicare drug benefit costing about $1.2 trillion over the next decade, three times what the White House estimated (at least publicly) back when it was pushing the plan. USA Today leads with a poll on Social Security that has 55 percent of respondents giving President Bush’s plan a thumbs down. The paper headlines respondents’ most popular option for shoring up the program: Sixty-eight percent were all for making “higher income workers pay Social Security taxes on all wages.”


    Sharon said he and Abbas have “agreed that all Palestinians will stop all acts of violence against all Israelis everywhere, and in parallel, Israel will cease all its military activity against all Palestinians everywhere.” Neither side used the word “cease-fire.” Most touchy issues were referred to committees, from the number of prisoners Israel will release to when Israel will follow through on its pledge to pull out of five West Bank cities.


    One unnamed Israeli official told the NYT that the deal still leaves Israel in a “pre-road map situation,” suggesting Sharon isn’t ready to do what the map calls for, such as freezing settlement building.


    Hamas leaders did a bit of media outreach, reminding reporters that Hamas isn’t in on the deal. Only the NYT raises a big flag on that, saying up high that the comments were an “immediate reminder of the fragility” of the truce. But read down to the 13th paragraph for a bit of context: “Hamas has agreed to a temporary period of quiet, and its statements on Tuesday may be more rhetoric than substance.”


    The NYT also fronts the new Medicare numbers, though it puts the 10-year cost at $720 billion. The Post, whose estimate is $500 billion higher, gives a brief nod to the lower number, saying the head of Medicare “cited several major savings and offsets that would reduce the federal government’s bottom-line cost.” The WP then moves right along, but does the Medicare chief have a compelling case for the lower number or not?


    Everybody stuffs or teases a suicide bomber at a police recruiting center in Baghdad who apparently killed 21. (Citing hospital officials, the LAT says 13 died.) One witness said this is the fifth time the center has been attacked. Another three police were killed in other attacks, as were two sons of one politician in a failed assassination attempt. As the LAT notes, the politician targeted caused a ruckus last year when he visited Israel.


    The NYT doesn’t headline the attacks and instead continues its recent curious habit of reading electoral tea leaves. The Times notes that the Kurdish coalition is faring well in the still-unfinished count. The group will probably come in second. The main Shiite coalition is expected to get a majority but not the two-thirds needed to govern solo. That’s where the Kurds might be able to help or block the coalition. (Hey, we said it was speculative.)


    The WP fronts some conservatives getting fidgety over what the paper describes as the president’s effort to increase “not only the size of the federal government but also its influence over the lives of millions of Americans by imposing new national restrictions on high schools, court cases and marriages.”


    Doing some crackerjack reporting, the NYT‘s Elisabeth Bumiller covers Bush giving a speech lauding his proposed cuts. Referring to the Even Start program, which serves kids with illiterate parents and is penciled in for elimination, the president said, “After three separate evaluations it has become abundantly clear that the program is not succeeding.” Bumiller quotes an Even Start lobbying group official crying foul, and leaves it at that. But how hard would it have been to track down those three purported evaluations or to get an independent assessment of the program? TP, using such obscure tools as Google, found a study, commissioned by the government, concluding, “On the whole, Even Start projects are meeting their legislative mandate. They recruit and serve needy families. And, a high percentage of families take part in core services and receive an amount of service that compares favorably with other existing programs.”


    USAT teases and others stuff Karl Rove’s promotion. He’ll now be in charge of coordinating policies between the national security council, economic advisers, and others. The NYT isn’t impressed: It’s “a move that formally gives him what he has had in practice all along.”


    American democracy on display … Everybody notes Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice whispering sweet nothings to European allies. Speaking, very generally, at a university in Paris, Rice said the U.S. and Europe should “turn away from the disagreements” of the past. And indeed, there were no disagreements at the Q&A after the speech. “Only a handful of the school’s 5,500 students were allowed near the auditorium where Rice spoke,” says the Post, “and the questions were vetted in advance by the school and the State Department.”

    Eric Umansky writes “Today’s Papers” for Slate. He can be reached at todayspapers@hotmail.com.

    Article URL: http://slate.msn.com/id/2113311/ if (window.print) { window.print() } else alert(‘To print his page press Ctrl-P on your keyboard nor choose print from your browser or device after clicking OK’);

  • Complete List: Academy Award Nominations





    The following is the list of nominees for the 77th Annual Academy Awards. The winners will be announced on Feb. 27, 2005.


    BEST PICTURE


    “The Aviator”
    “Finding Neverland”
    “Million Dollar Baby”
    “Ray”
    “Sideways”


    DIRECTOR


    Martin Scorsese, “The Aviator”
    Clint Eastwood, “Million Dollar Baby”
    Taylor Hackford, “Ray”
    Alexander Payne, “Sideways”
    Mike Leigh, “Vera Drake”


    ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE


    Don Cheadle, “Hotel Rwanda”
    Johnny Depp, “Finding Neverland”
    Leonardo DiCaprio, “The Aviator”
    Clint Eastwood, “Million Dollar Baby”
    Jamie Foxx, “Ray”


    ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE


    Annette Bening, “Being Julia”
    Catalina Sandino Moreno, “Maria Full of Grace”
    Imelda Staunton, “Vera Drake”
    Hilary Swank, “Million Dollar Baby”
    Kate Winslet, “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”


    ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE


    Alan Alda, “The Aviator”
    Thomas Haden Church, “Sideways”
    Jamie Foxx, “Collateral”
    Morgan Freeman, “Million Dollar Baby”
    Clive Owen, “Closer”


    ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE


    Cate Blanchett, “The Aviator”
    Laura Linney, “Kinsey”
    Virginia Madsen, “Sideways”
    Sophie Okendo, “Hotel Rwanda”
    Natalie Portman, “Closer”


    ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY


    John Logan, “The Aviator”
    Charlie Kaufman, Michel Gondry and Pierre Bismuth, “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”
    Keir Pearson and Terry George, “Hotel Rwanda”
    Brad Bird, “The Incredibles”
    Mike Leigh, “Vera Drake”


    ADAPTED SCREENPLAY


    Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy, Ethan Hawke and Kim Krizan, “Before Sunset”
    David Magee, “Finding Neverland”
    Paul Haggis, “Million Dollar Baby”
    José Rivera, “The Motorcycle Diaries”
    Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor, “Sideways”


    FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM


    “As It Is in Heaven” (Sweden)
    “The Chorus” (France)
    “Downfall” (Germany)
    “The Sea Inside” (Spain)
    “Yesterday” (South Africa)


    ANIMATED FEATURE


    “The Incredibles”
    “Shark Tale”
    “Shrek 2″


    ORIGINAL SCORE


    Jan A.P. Kaczmarek, “Finding Neverland”
    John Williams, “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban”
    Thomas Newman, “Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events”
    John Debney, “The Passion of the Christ”
    James Newton Howard, “The Village”


    ORIGINAL SONG

    “Accidentally in Love” from “Shrek 2″
    Adam Duritz, Charles Gillingham, Jim Bogios, David Immergluck, Matthew Mallery, David Bryson and Daniel Vickrey

    “Al Otro Lado Del Rio” from “The Motorcycle Diaries”
    Jorge Drexler

    “Believe” from “The Polar Express”
    Glen Ballard and Alan Silvestri

    “Learn to Be Lonely” from “The Phantom of the Opera”
    Andrew Lloyd Webber and Charles Hart

    “Look to Your Path (Vois Sur Ton Chemin)” from “The Chorus”
    Bruno Coulais and Christophe Barratier


    ART DIRECTION


    Dante Ferretti and Francesca Lo Schiavo, “The Aviator”
    Gemma Jackson and Trisha Edwards, “Finding Neverland”
    Rick Heinrichs and Cheryl A. Carasik “Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events”
    Anthony Pratt and Celia Bobak, “The Phantom of the Opera”
    Aline Bonetto, “A Very Long Engagement”


    CINEMATOGRAPHY


    Robert Richardson, “The Aviator”
    Zhao Xiaoding, “House of Flying Daggers”
    Caleb Deschanel, “The Passion of the Christ”
    John Mathieson, “The Phantom of the Opera”
    Bruno Delbonnel, “A Very Long Engagement”


    COSTUME DESIGN


    Sandy Powell, “The Aviator”
    Alexandra Byrne, “Finding Neverland”
    Colleen Atwood, “Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events”
    Sharen Davis, “Ray”
    Bob Ringwood, “Troy”


    MAKEUP


    Valli O’Reilly and Bill Corso, “Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events”
    Keith Vanderlaan and Christien Tinsley, “The Passion of the Christ”
    Jo Allen and Manuel García, “The Sea Inside”


    DOCUMENTARY FEATURE


    “Born Into Brothels”
    “The Story of the Weeping Camel”
    “Super Size Me”
    “Tupac: Resurrection”
    “Twist of Faith”


    SOUND MIXING


    Tom Fleischman and Petur Hliddal, “The Aviator”
    Randy Thom, Gary A. Rizzo and Doc Kane, “The Incredibles”
    Randy Thom, Tom Johnson, Dennis Sands and William B. Kaplan, “The Polar Express”
    Scott Millan, Greg Orloff, Bob Beemer and Steve Cantamessa, “Ray”
    Kevin O’Connell, Greg P. Russell, Jeffrey J. Haboush and Joseph Geisinger, “Spider-Man 2″


    SOUND EDITING


    Michael Silvers and Randy Thom, “The Incredibles”
    Randy Thom and Dennis Leonard, “The Polar Express”
    Paul N.J. Ottosson, “Spider-Man 2″


    VISUAL EFFECTS


    Roger Guyett, Tim Burke, John Richardson and Bill George, “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban”
    John Nelson, Andrew R. Jones, Erik Nash and Joe Letteri, “I, Robot”
    John Dykstra, Scott Stokdyk, Anthony LaMolinara and John Frazier, “Spider-Man 2″


    FILM EDITING


    Thelma Schoonmaker, “The Aviator”
    Jim Miller and Paul Rubell, “Collateral”
    Matt Chesse, “Finding Neverland”
    Joel Cox, “Million Dollar Baby”
    Paul Hirsch, “Ray”


    SHORT FILM – ANIMATED


    Birthday Boy
    Gopher Broke
    Guard Dog
    Lorenzo
    Ryan


    SHORT FILM – LIVE ACTION


    Everything in This Country Must
    Little Terrorist
    7:35 in the Morning
    Two Cars, One Night
    Wasp


    DOCUMENTARY SHORT SUBJECT


    Autism is a World
    The Children of Leningradsky
    Hardwood
    Mighty Times: The Children’s March
    Sister Rose’s Passion