icrosoft posted solid growth in quarterly sales and profit yesterday, buoyed by strong holiday sales of personal computers and video games.

Microsoft, the world’s largest software company, said sales for the second quarter rose 7 percent, to $10.82 billion, surpassing the $10.55 billion average of Wall Street analysts’ estimates.

“This was yet another excellent quarter,” said John Connors, chief financial officer at Microsoft. “In general, the economic environment is healthy.”

Microsoft earned 32 cents a share during the quarter on profit of $3.46 billion. That compares with a profit of 14 cents a share, or $1.55 billion, in the year-earlier period, when the company took a $2.21 billion charge for an employee stock-option exchange program. Excluding a stock-based compensation expense in the latest quarter, Microsoft said, it had a profit of 35 cents a share, beating analysts’ forecast of 33 cents.

Shares of Microsoft, which reported its results after the close of regular trading, rose 10 cents, to close at $26.11, then rose as high as $26.60 in after-hours trading.

Some of Microsoft’s new businesses did well, including its home and entertainment division, which posted its first profit. Sales in that division were led by Halo 2, a science-fiction video game featuring a genetically enhanced “supersoldier,” which helped turn Microsoft’s Xbox into the best-selling game console on the market during the holidays. The company said it had sold more than six million copies of the game since it was released in November.

Over all, the games unit had a profit of $84 million, in contrast to a loss of $397 million in the year-earlier period. Mr. Connors warned that the company did not expect the business to continue to post a profit this year, though it is on track to reach sustained profitability in 2007.

Most of the company’s traditional businesses also posted strong sales, which company executives attributed to an increase in sales of personal computers and servers. Revenue from the Windows operating system division increased 5.3 percent, to $3.22 billion.

But the brightest spot was Microsoft’s server and tools business, which grew 18 percent during the quarter, to $2.52 billion from $2.15 billion a year earlier. “The world is buying a heck of a lot of servers,” Mr. Connors said.

Revenue from the SQL Server product alone grew 25 percent, indicating that Linux, a free open-source operating system used to run many servers, is posing less of a threat to Microsoft’s corporate business than people may think.

“Linux is an issue, but it’s not the Microsoft killer it’s made out to be,” said Charles J. Di Bona, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Company. “They’re holding their own.”

Analysts said the gains in Microsoft’s server business indicated a strengthening corporate market. “It’s a good sign of demand for enterprise PC’s,” said Gene A. Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray.

Mr. Munster described the quarter as solid, but said Microsoft still faced the considerable challenge of being a mature technology company. Successes like Halo 2, for example, “don’t come around every quarter,” he said.

The company’s MSN Web sites had a profit of $130 million during the quarter, after losing $95 million a year earlier. Mr. Connors said that advertising revenue was increasing for the MSN business, but that the gains were offset by a decline in revenue from Internet access fees as customers move toward higher-speed broadband access. Revenue rose 7.7 percent, to $588 million.

Analysts characterized the quarter as strong, though some cautioned that the success of Halo 2 was a one-time event. Still, the company posted solid gains in major businesses, most notably Windows, which accounts for the majority of its revenues.

Microsoft raised its forecast for the full year. The company now expects to earn $1.09 to $1.11 a share, up from its previous forecast of $1.07 to $1.09. Revenue is now expected to be $39.8 billion to $40 billion.

For the third quarter, Microsoft predicts earnings of 27 cents to 28 cents a share on revenue of $9.7 billion to $9.8 billion, in large part on improvements in corporate spending.

Mr. Connors said Microsoft expected PC shipments to increase 9 percent to 11 percent during the rest of 2005, up from an earlier forecast of 8 percent to 10 percent.

verweight people have a tendency to sit, while lean ones have trouble holding still and spend two hours more a day on their feet, pacing around and fidgeting, researchers are reporting in findings published today.

The difference translates into about 350 calories a day, enough to produce a weight loss of 30 to 40 pounds in one year without trips to the gym – if only heavy people could act more restless, like thin ones.

The difference in activity levels may be biological and inborn, the researchers say, the result of genetically determined levels of brain chemicals that govern a person’s tendency to move around. It is the predisposition to be inactive that leads to obesity, and not the other way around, they suggest.

The findings, being published today in the journal Science, are from a study in which researchers at the Mayo Clinic outfitted 10 lean men and women and 10 slightly obese ones – all of whom described themselves as “couch potatoes” – with underwear carrying sensors that measured their body postures and movements every half second for 10 days on several occasions. By the end of the study, which required a staff of 150, the researchers had collected 25 million pieces of data on each participant.

One thing that convinced the scientists that the activity levels were innate, and not the product of a person’s being overweight or underweight, was that the levels did not change when the subjects were forced to gain or lose weight in different phases of the study. To make sure they knew exactly how many calories the subjects were eating, the researchers cooked all their meals for weeks at a time, and had them pledge not to cheat. A total of 20,000 meals were prepared.

The director of the study, Dr. James Levine, an endocrinologist and nutritionist at the Mayo Clinic, said the findings offered hope to overweight people, suggesting that relatively simple and painless changes in their daily behavior, like making an effort to walk more and ride less, could help control weight. He said increases in obesity in recent decades could be traced more to declines in daily exercise – more time spent in cars, behind desks and in front of computers and televisions – than to increases in eating.

In an environment that allows people to be sedentary, those with a biological predisposition to sit still will do so, he said. In contrast, the restless ones will still find ways to burn off calories, even if it means walking around their desks.

“People with obesity are tremendously efficient,” Dr. Levine said. “Any opportunity not to waste energy, they take. If you think about it that way, it all makes sense. As soon as they have an opportunity to sit down and not waste those calories, they do.”

Participants in the study went through three 11-week phases over a year or so in which their diets were controlled to maintain, increase or decrease their weight. They were paid $2,000 at the end of each phase, for a total of $6,000.

Each phase included a 10-day period during which they had to wear the underwear with the sensors around the clock, taking it off for only about 15 minutes a day to shower and get a fresh set from the researchers.

The top was either an undershirt or a sports bra made of Lycra, and the bottom was a risqué-looking pair of shorts with openings at the crotch and backside so the garment would not have to be lowered during the day, which would have disturbed the sensors.

Dr. Levine said he had designed the outfit with a colleague.

“We had to be very creative,” he said. “And you have to test them for comfort. I would put them on top of my suit. Mayo has a very strict dress code. Nothing gave me more pleasure than to wander around with this bizarre underwear over my suit.”

Dr. Eric Ravussin, an obesity researcher at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, La., who wrote an essay in Science about Dr. Levine’s study, said that because the tendency to sit still seemed to be biological, it might not be easy for obese people to change their ways. “The bad news,” Dr. Ravussin said, “is that you cannot tell people, ‘Why don’t you sit less and be a little more fidgety,’ because they may do it for a couple of hours but won’t sustain it for days and weeks and months and years.”

But Dr. Rudolph Leibel, an obesity researcher at Columbia University Medical Center, said, “People can be taught and motivated to change their behavior in service of their health.”

Dr. Leibel also noted that although it was plausible that the tendency to be inactive was biologically determined, it had not been proved.

Dr. Ravussin said it might be possible to help people stay lean by making their environments less conducive to sitting, though that would take major societal changes like rebuilding neighborhoods in which people can walk to markets instead of “the remote shopping mall with 10,000 parking spots and everybody is fighting for the handicapped one.”

A participant in the study, Othelmo da Silva, 41, an academic adviser at Rochester Community and Technical College in Minnesota, said he was overweight and felt encouraged by the study and the idea that people could lose weight by moving around more and did not necessarily have to join a gym.

As for the idea that the tendency to sit still might be genetic, Mr. da Silva said no “lazy genes” had been identified and added, “I personally believe in self-determination over detrimental biological predisposition.”

Dr. Jules Hirsch, an obesity researcher at Rockefeller University, said studies in the 1950′s first suggested that obese people were less fidgety than thin ones. One study, of young women playing tennis, showed that although fat and thin ones played equally well, fat ones wasted less motion hitting the ball. They were seemingly more efficient, and probably burned fewer calories.

Dr. Hirsch said some people were probably born with, or developed at an early age, a “greater efficiency at caloric storage,” from eating more or moving less.

“This phenomenon helps store energy,” he said, “but is a great risk factor for the development of obesity.”

But until it is understood better, he said, “we’re not apt to understand the overall obesity problem any better.”

Dr. Levine of the Mayo Clinic said the study findings had inspired him to redesign his office. His computer is now mounted over a treadmill, and he walks 0.7 miles an hour while he works.

“I converted a completely sedentary job to a mobile one,” he said.

The walking is addictive and “terribly good fun,” Dr. Levine said, adding that he has had 30 or 40 requests from colleagues at Mayo for treadmill desks like his.

Has he lost weight? He does not know.

“I’m a relatively lean bloke,” he said. “I never weigh myself. You’ll think I’m a bad nutritionist. I don’t recommend people weigh themselves all the time. It’s not a healthy thing to do.”