Month: November 2012

  • Brazilian GP – Saturday – Qualifying Session Report

     

    Brazilian GP – Saturday – Qualifying Session Report

    All McLaren front row in Brazil

    Lewis Hamilton, Brazilian GP 2012

    Lewis Hamilton, Brazilian GP 2012 

     © Active Pictures

    Lewis Hamilton (1:12.458) and Jenson Button (1:12.513) locked out the front row of the grid for tomorrow’s championship-deciding Brazilian GP at Interlagos.

    It was the fourth all-McLaren front row of the season and increases the heat on championship aspirants Sebastian Vettel (1:12.760), who qualified fourth, and especially Fernando Alonso (1:13.253) who qualified eighth but starts seventh after a 10-place grid penalty for a third reprimand (mising a weight check) is applied to sixth-placed Pastor Maldonado (1:13.174).

    It was Hamilton’s 26th career pole and his seventh of the season as McLaren heads into the race hoping for a 1-2 finish that would see the team overhaul Ferrari for runner-up slot in the constructors’ championship.

    The big question mark is the weather. The forecast for Sunday in Sao Paulo is 96% rain with some sources predicting 10mm in the one day. Quite when and at what intensity is unpredictable , although qualifying itself, at least Q1 and Q2, were held in changeable conditions.

    Mark Webber (1:12.581) was the quicker Red Bull driver in qualifying as Vettel ran wide in Turn 4 on his first Q1 and was then forced into a more conservative second run than the banzai lap he could have afforded if his first run had been a banker.

    At Ferrari too, the usual number two was quicker than the championship aspirant as Felipe Massa (1:12.987) lines up fifth, a quarter of a second faster than Alonso.

    The Spaniard’s understeering Ferrari looked suspiciously as if it had been optimised to give him the best possible opportunity in a wet race, a fact his post session comments also hinted at heavily.

    “I think I did a good qualifying,” Alonso said, “and given how the last few races have gone, my chances of making it onto the podium are still intact. That will be my objective because I know that, at least under normal circumstances, we are not in with a chance of fighting for the win.

    “I also know that if I am to have any hopes for the title, it’s more plausible to count on a retirement for Vettel rather than for him to finish in a position where I can get ahead of him in the classification.

    “Obviously I am therefore hoping for a chaotic race and so the rain could be an important factor even if, in the wet, it’s riskier for everyone.”

    Alonso then claimed that his car had not been particularly set up for the wet, given that there is not so much difference between wet and dry set-ups these days, and that Massa had performed above the norm to outqualify him. But then he would say that, wouldn’t he?

    Alonso must finish on the podium if he is to overhaul the 13-point advantage that Vettel heads into the race with and, as he says, hope that Sebastian does not score.

    While he has only failed to make it onto the Interlagos podium three times in nine attempts, Alonso could have a nervous Turn 1 from the middle of the grid.

    Kimi Raikkonen (1:13.298) and Nico Rosberg (1:13.483) completed the top 10 qualifiers while Michael Schumacher will make his 306th and last F1 start from 13th on the grid after Maldonado’s penalty is applied.

     

    Copyright 1988-2012, Inside F1, Inc.

  • Halle Berry’s Ex and Fiance Hospitalized After Thanksgiving Brawl

    Halle Berry’s Ex and Fiance Hospitalized After Thanksgiving Brawl

    Berry and Martinez.It’s probably safe to assume that Halle Berry’s ex-boyfriend Gabriel Aubry and current fiance Olivier Martinez are not thankful for each other this Thanksgiving. The two men had to be hospitalized after they got into an all-out brawl this morning at the Oscar winner’s Los Angeles home, reports TMZ and People. According toTMZ, it all began when Aubry dropped off his 4-year-old daughter with Berry, Nahla, back at her mother’s home. Once inside, Martinez approached the model and said, “We have to move on,” in reference to the battle between Berry and Aubry over Berry moving Nahla to France (a judge recently denied her request) – and that’s when Aubry lost it.

     

    Witnesses at the scene tell TMZ that Aubry, 36, swung at Martinez’s face, but he blocked it and was instead struck on the shoulder. Then Aubry pushed the actor to the ground, and that’s when Martinez punched him in the face. After wrestling on the ground, Martinez, 46, was able to pin Aubry to the ground and made a “citizen’s arrest” for assault. 

    Aubry. (GettyImages)

    Despite the report that the former Versace model was arrested, Los Angeles Police Department tellsPeople that no arrests were made, but the investigation is ongoing.

    According to TMZ, Aubry was taken to a hospital for a broken rib, contusions to his face, and possibly a head injury. A short time later, Martinez was taken to the same hospital with a neck injury and possibly a broken hand.

    As a result, a judge has issued an emergency protective order mandating that Aubry stay at least 100 yards away from Berry, Martinez, and Nahla.

    Just a day before the Thanksgiving Day brawl, the group all attended the same holiday party at a home in Beverly Hills, where Berry reportedly “handed off” Nahla to her father. That night, Aubry and his daughter were spotted at The Grove where they saw a movie together. 

     

    Copyright. 2012.Yahoo Incorporated. All Rights Reserved

  • FIA Thursday press conference – Brazil22 Nov 2012

    FIA Thursday press conference – Brazil22 Nov 2012

    Michael Schumacher (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 in the Press Conference. Formula One World Championship, Rd20 Brazilian Grand Prix, Preparations, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 22 November 2012Felipe Massa (BRA) Ferrari in the Press Conference. Formula One World Championship, Rd20 Brazilian Grand Prix, Preparations, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 22 November 2012Lewis Hamilton (GBR) McLaren in the Press Conference. Formula One World Championship, Rd20 Brazilian Grand Prix, Preparations, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 22 November 2012Bruno Senna (BRA) Williams in the Press Conference. Formula One World Championship, Rd20 Brazilian Grand Prix, Preparations, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 22 November 2012Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing in the Press Conference. Formula One World Championship, Rd20 Brazilian Grand Prix, Preparations, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 22 November 2012Fernando Alonso (ESP) Ferrari in the Press Conference. Formula One World Championship, Rd20 Brazilian Grand Prix, Preparations, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 22 November 2012(L to R): Bruno Senna (BRA) Williams, Lewis Hamilton (GBR) McLaren, Felipe Massa (BRA) Ferrari, Sebastian Vettel (GER) Red Bull Racing, Michael Schumacher (GER) Mercedes AMG F1 and Fernando Alonso (ESP) Ferrari in the Press Conference. Formula One World C

    Reproduced with kind permission of the FIA

    Drivers – Felipe Massa (Ferrari), Lewis Hamilton (McLaren), Bruno Senna (Williams), Sebastian Vettel (Red Bull Racing), Michael Schumacher (Mercedes), Fernando Alonso (Ferrari)

    Q: A very important weekend for everybody, the final weekend of the championship and lots of pressure all round, apart, perhaps, from Michael Schumacher. You’ve been here before Michael, you have an extraordinary record at this race and you’re finally ending your championship bid after many, many years, after many seasons. What are your feelings coming into this weekend? 
    Michael Schumacher:
     I guess I have some experience and that’s why, probably, I’m rather relaxed about the happenings. On top [of that] we are not in any championship fight compared to last time that happened to me, obviously. Well, I’ll just take the best out of it and enjoy it as much as I can.

    Q: Is there a certain sadness?
    MS:
     Probably not, no.

    Q: Quite happy to leave it.
    MS:
     Yeah, I have tried that mission to end successful. It didn’t work this time but I’m quite happy to finish from here and go for a different life again.

    Q: Felipe, if we can come to you. You’ve won here twice before, what can you do to help Fernando win the championship.
    Felipe Massa:
     Well, first of all I’ll try to win a third time. That’s always the right direction to think about racing – always thinking about victory. Here is a very special place for me and I’m going to try to win and hopefully Fernando can finish second without any problems to win the championship.

    Q: Just give us a bit of a summary of your season so far. What are your thoughts on the season? 
    FM:
     I think it was a very difficult season until August. So, struggling… in some of the races I was not struggling but I could not put together the result. Always happened something in the race that I couldn’t finish in the right position. I would say after August everything was better and we were able to put together the right… almost the right result at every race. It was a very good second part of the season and very good preparation for next year.

    Q: Lewis, we saw what you can do in this championship last weekend, a fantastic race, and of course you won the championship here; you know what it’s all about this final race of the series. For you, you’ve been with McLaren for many years, it’s your final race for McLaren. How do you approach this weekend?
    Lewis Hamilton:
     Good morning everyone. It’s quite a unique experience for me. I’ve obviously never been in the situation I’m in this weekend, where it’s my last race for the team I grew up in. It’s going to be a tough one. Nonetheless, we’re going to push as hard as we can, as we did in the last race, and try to win. I’ve never won here before. So I’m going to have to try and beat Felipe, as he wants to win it. It’s such a beautiful race here so hopefully the weather will hold up for us.

    Q: After so many years with McLaren what are your feelings leaving the team? 
    LH:
     I only have good memories. I leave with just the greatest memories, the best experiences and hopefully a lot of good friends I will continue to be friends with throughout the future. I was just saying to them that even though I’ll be with Mercedes, I’ll probably keep coming back to have lunch and dinner back at the hospitality because the food’s great there. So, I hope Mercedes’ hospitality lives up to the one we have.

    Q: Bruno, a summary of your season so far.
    Bruno Senna:
     It’s been a very challenging season, lots of learning. We got some very good results and some tough races as well. Considering it was my first full year in Formula One, and with the small handicap of not doing free practice on Fridays, I think it’s been a pretty good year. In the end most of my races have been very strong. Just starting from a different position from where I should be starting has made me score less points than I could have had. In the end of the day it’s learning and you normally do much better on the second attempt at the same thing, so for sure there will be a lot of improvement to be done for next year.

    Q: Are you confident there will be a next year? The future seems to be undecided at the moment.
    BS:
     Yeah it’s undecided and I think we will have to wait until after the season to see what’s going to happen. Let’s hope it comes in a good way and we can be in a competitive car for next season.

    Q: Sebastian to some extent we look at an unpredictable weekend, in that the weather seems to be unpredictable and there’s a little bit of a question mark over the reliability. To what extent are you nervous about this weekend?
    Sebastian Vettel:
     In terms of general preparation we do what we can. Weather-wise, it’s Sao Paulo. It’s the same as if you go to Spa, you know, things can happen quickly and the weather can change a lot here, so… yeah, I spoke to some locals and I think there was a big rain two days ago which wasn’t expected. Probably for Saturday, Sunday there’s some rain on the way, but then again you don’t know how much and when so I think I asked Pirelli yesterday if they have all the containers here with the rain tyres, and that’s the case, so I don’t think we have to be concerned.

    Q: At the same time you can be confident: 13-point lead in the championship, you’ve had excellent results here, Red Bull have had excellent results here.
    SV:
     Yeah, I think the circuit seemed to suit our car in previous years. I think we need to confirm it. So all eyes on Friday, to start the weekend, to get into the groove, but I think we can be as confident as we could in this stage. Obviously we know there is a lot ahead but we are in a great position.

    Q: Michael, we’ll come back to you again. It’s been 20 years of Grand Prix racing. How can you sum it up?
    MS:
     Well, I don’t think we have long enough here to sum it up, but let’s put it that way: It was mostly 20 good years and lots of fun and lots of excitement.

    Q: You’d recommend it to Sebastian would you? 
    MS:
     Well, I just remember when I was in the early days, I said if you’re going to do this four or five years that’s going to be probably most of it, and then I will be tired and I can’t see myself longer than this. Obviously it became almost 21 years. I’m pretty sure it’s difficult for those guys to imagine that longer time ahead, but let’s see.

    Q: Fernando, it’s quite difficult for you from where you are, 13 points behind in the championship. What are the chances this weekend?
    Fernando Alonso:
     Well, I think we need to try to do a normal weekend, try to score as many points as we can, obvious it will be good to be in the podium and score a minimum 15 points and then when we cross the line we see where Sebastian is and we try to do some numbers after that. The first priority for us is to be in the podium, let’s say, which give us the possible to score more than 13 points and then we need to wait obviously for the results from Red Bull because we have not… it is not in our hands, we have not much to lose, we have only the possibility to win something and we will try to do our best.

    Q: Regardless of what happens this weekend, what do Ferrari need to do to be in a better position for next year?
    FA:
     Well, we are working hard, it was a tough season for us, the first couple of months were not as we expected. When we put the car on the circuit the first time in Jerez we were two seconds off the pace and we didn’t understand how was the car working so we changed many things. There was a lot of work going on in the wind tunnel in Maranello, in the car itself and after some understanding of the car we were a little bit more in the pace and we were able to fight for podiums more or less constantly all the season and that gave the possibility to be right now fighting for the World Championship. But we are not totally happy with the performance of the car all through the season and many changes will be for next year and hopefully we can recover a little bit of the gap we have now. In winter we will have to do an extra job compared to the other teams to recover this gap.

    QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR

    Q: (Kate Walker – Girl Racer) Seb, despite your enviable record in this sport, quite often people say… or they may not give you the credit that you might feel you deserve because you’ve always had such a strong car. How does it feel for you hearing people say ‘oh, I’d like to see him in a different car, I’d like to see him in a worse car’? Does that demotivate you or motivate you to just prove everybody wrong?
    SV:
     Well I think if you look back, I don’t know how far, but as far as I can look back, I think there was never people, y’know, really, really successful in a really bad car. I think you always… I think it’s a natural thing to happen that one day you have strong drivers in a strong team so you end up with a strong combination and then obviously that is difficult to beat. I think it’s natural to start in a weaker car, I think we have all been in that situation. Michael started in a Jordan which wasn’t competitive but he set some highlights, Fernando I think started in a Minardi, set some highlights. Obviously in my case I started with the BMW, replacing Robert for one race, which was a great chance and then afterwards I got the seat in Toro Rosso, which at the time was not a very competitive car but I think we did a very good job and even won a race. Obviously with the circumstances allowing us to close the gap back then but… yeah, nevertheless I think we had a great season, finishing in the points a couple of times and obviously after that to step up to Red Bull Racing and 2009 was a great and fantastic season for myself, for the team, for the first time to be competitive, finishing on the podiums, win races, so I think it was a fairly normal way that I went. 

    Q: (Simon Cass – Daily Mail) Another one for Seb, would you like to have a team-mate like Felipe Massa? And you were very cool about the situation last weekend: will you be just as cool about the situation last weekend if you’re not World Champion on Sunday? SV: Well what they do is not in our hands. I didn’t follow up if Felipe had a real trouble with the gearbox or not but as I said it’s not our job to focus on these things. After seeing Felipe on Sunday night in Austin I’m not sure whether he would be a good team-mate! No, I’m joking. I think obviously it is a different approach compared to my team but that’s how life is. I think everyone handles certain situations in a different way.

    Q: (Frederic Ferret – L’Equipe) Michael, you know both of the contenders for a long time, what kind of memory will you give us for Seb and for Fernando? And question for Seb and Fernando, what kind of memory will you keep from Michael?
    MS:
     Well, I mean obviously with Fernando I have had quite a few more years together competing and fighting championships. Obviously that is slightly different in this respect, it was tough moments. I mean, he was unfortunately in quite a few moments looking very strong and doing too good a job honestly – should have taken it easy and looked after the old man! But on Seb’s side, we’ve been friends for a long time and I sort of follow his career into Formula One and seeing him doing so well, obviously makes me proud. We’ve both grown up on my home track in Kerpen and to see from where he started to end up and kind of being dominant for quite a while recently, that’s quite an achievement.

    Q: And you two on Michael.
    FA:
     I think we will always remember the privilege to race and compete with someone like Michael that will be record in history of Formula One, maybe for a very long time and we’ve been there, we’ve been in the grid close to him. As Michael said, some good fights and great respect on the circuit and always constantly learning with someone that changed a little bit this sport.
    SV: I think it’s a little bit different for Fernando than it is for me because obviously I had the privilege to meet Michael when I was a small kid. He was my childhood hero. Maybe he can close his ears or shut his ears now, but he was a true inspiration back then, for me and for many other kids, as he mentioned, in Kerpen. He was our hero. Obviously we had the honour to meet him. He was taking care of the championship held in Kerpen and came to the last race, gave all the trophies to everyone, every child, more than 100 at the time, so he was very patient and now, obviously, we understand that the busy schedule that he had, taking that extra time for the fans but especially for us, for the kids who were racing, was something very special, a very special memory. When I met him the first time, obviously I didn’t know what to say because I didn’t want to ask something stupid but for sure, I remember these moments and then later on. Today I think it’s a little bit different because you are more grown up, you have a normal relationship so when I talk to him now, it doesn’t feel like talking to my childhood hero, it feels like talking to Michael so I see the person rather than what he has achieved but obviously, if you remind yourself of that and the fact that I was racing against him for the last couple of years, unfortunately not as close as he probably shared with Fernando, but still that thought or that image was very, very far away when I was a small kid, because obviously he was already in Formula One but for me it was a dream so very far away but very special for the last couple of years, very special the relationship we share and I think he will always be an inspiration for myself.

    Q:(Marco dell’Innocenti – La Gazzetta dello Sport) Sebastian, Bernie Ecclestone said to the German Bild Zeitung that despite you already having won two titles and maybe now a third, you miss out on charisma, compared to former drivers such as Hunt, Senna, Lauda. And he also said that not only you but all the drivers of your generation are more or less in the same situation, because, he said, teams pampered you too much and the FIA put muscle to you, so you are not free to explain yourselves. What do you think about that? Maybe this is also a general question; if somebody else would like to answer, I would appreciate it. 
    SV:
     Well, I think it’s a difficult question. I don’t know exactly what he said but maybe he was just taking the piss out of… sorry, maybe he was just taking the mickey out of the newspaper which is very possible with Bernie, but given what he said what you just said, I think generally it’s difficult. Hopefully I have a little bit left in the sport so I can make up a little bit but also I think these days are very different to the previous days in terms of the freedom that we have. To give you an example, imagine that you find all of us, sitting here on Saturday night having a beer, even if it’s just one beer, it would be a massive scene on Sunday. Yeah, unfortunately it’s not that easy as maybe it used to be in the past. Last race we were in Austin, in Texas. The last winner in Texas was Keke Rosberg in 1984, I think, and he was having a smoke on the podium. I’m not sure whether people would be too happy with that when they already get excited when sometimes the language is not appropriate after just getting out of the car.

    Q: (Paul Weaver – The Guardian) Fernando, if win the championship, people will recalls some great driving from you, but do you think your achievement will be damaged by the memory of what Ferrari did to your teammate’s gearbox in the last race in Texas? 
    FA:
     Funny. I think we’ve seen so many scenes coming from the teams, not only this year but in the past in Formula One; we don’t need to go too far this year with some of the races that we had some doubts – even Saturday night – of which teams and from which position they will start, depending on some decisions or some limits that they were finding in the regulations which we saw this year from many teams. I’m proud of my team, it was a strategic decision, to start on the clean side with both cars, also fighting for the Constructors championship that is one of the targets that we have, beating McLaren and it worked quite well. Because it worked quite well, maybe the people were not very happy but I’m proud of my team, more than anything it’s because they said the truth when we changed the gearbox. Not many teams are able to say the truth when they make a strategic decision.

    Q: (Andy Benson – BBC Sport) Fernando, Lewis is moving teams next year. You’ve been his teammate, what can Nico expect? What’s it like having Lewis as a teammate? 
    FA:
     I think it will be fine for him, it will be a good challenge at Mercedes, and as a teammate, I think he will be very strong, so Nico will have some extra work to do. After three years with Michael, I think Nico keeps learning many things and another tough challenge with Lewis will arrive. I think they will be very strong. I think Nico and Lewis together, with the Mercedes, they can be serious contenders for next year. In the future, who knows, but I have a lot of respect for Lewis. I always said that he’s probably the best or one of the best here. I shared a year with him, it didn’t work too well because maybe we were not sharing the same philosophy but without McLaren, why not?

    Q: (Ian Parkes – Press Association) Fernando and Sebastian; two years ago in Abu Dhabi, Fernando you had a 15 point lead over Sebastian going into the very last race. Sebastian went and won the title. Does what happened then – although the track and circumstances are a bit different – does that give you belief as to what can be achieved? And Sebastian, does that make you fearful as to what could happen? 
    FA:
     I think these are different circumstances from Abu Dhabi. Now we have DRS, KERS so it (was) a little bit more difficult to pass (then) and maybe the rule was also introduced because of that race. I think even if you find yourself at the back of the grid, you’re still able to recover positions as we saw in Abu Dhabi this year. Even if Seb started last, he finished on the podium, so we will see what we have in mind, that this is Formula One. This is a sport and anything can happen until the chequered flag so we will try to do the best race we can and, as I said, cross the line on the podium which gives us more than 13 points and see where Sebastian crosses the line. If we win, we will be very happy but we know that we need some strange combination of results; if we don’t win, we will congratulate him and we will try next year. Nothing really surprising.
    SV: I think we’re very happy in the position that we are in. I think two years back we would have loved to have been in Fernando’s position. If you could chose, I think it’s clear but as Fernando said, in sport anything can happen so we need look after ourselves. The weekend starts tomorrow morning and not on Sunday, so really we have to go step by step, trying to do everything to ensure that we get the maximum result. Historically we’ve been very quick here, historically we know also it’s quite a place where a lot of things can happen so we need to be sharp in the moment and see what we can get.

    Q: (Ian Parkes – Press Association) Lewis, what memories will you be taking away from McLaren? I presume here, four years ago, will be your greatest one. 
    LH:
     I think I’ll take away only the positive memories of our journey together. Obviously winning the World Championship, winning my first Grand Prix, starting out together and I guess this weekend.

    Q: (Carlos Miguel – La Gaceta) Sebastian, is there extra pressure that a lot of people think that you must win this championship? 
    SV:
     Yeah, I think it’s obviously normal if you’re in that position. I think we fight all year, some ups, some downs. I think everyone had the same to be in that position so now there’s no reason to complain or not to be happy. Obviously there’s one thing that the people expect, but another thing what we expect. All year we’ve been trying to push very hard and trying to put ourselves in a very strong position, to fight for the championship, ideally until the last race and be in the best possible place. Now we arrive in the last race, we are in a strong position so I think we can be happy with that but nevertheless, there’s one more race to go, and as I said, we have to make sure that we focus on every single step to get the job done here.

    Q: (Carlos Miguel – La Gaceta) Fernando, is there less pressure in that you have nothing to lose? 
    FA:
     Well, I think in Formula One there’s always pressure but definitely we have less than on some other occasions and maybe less than probably if we were leading the championship, because as you said, we have nothing really to lose. We are arriving in second position, we are arriving after two qualifyings dominated by Red Bull – well not two qualifyings, five or six – and then we were around positions seventh, eighth in the last couple of Grands Prix so recovered 13 points, it looks like a very difficult achievement and I think, as I said, if everything goes normally, we should finish second. If something happens, maybe we will win the championship so, because it’s probably not in our hands, the pressure is much less.

    Q: (Luigi Perna – La Gazzetta dello Sport) Fernando, do you think you will have another possibility in future, if not this year? 
    FA:
     I hope so. I think I’m 31 and I still feel that I will have some more possibilities. I’m at Ferrari for the next four or five years, minimum, so I think that will always give you the possibility to fight for World Championships. In three years at Ferrari, I arrive two times already fighting for the championship at the last race: 2010 in Abu Dhabi and now in Brazil, even with so many difficulties and chaotic years, let’s say, for us, in terms of performance, in terms of problems and we were not dominant in any part of those championships, so even with those problems we are fighting for two or three years at Ferrari, so I have no doubts that in the next four or five years there will be more fights and more championships, but let’s concentrate on this one. 

    Q: (Rodrigo Gini – Estados de Minas) Fernando, you said about the qualifying position, as you said in Austin, you said you would start in sixth, seventh. Do you think it will be the same, the gap will remain in Brazil? 
    SV:
     Yeah, I think so. I think there’s no magic part that you can put on the car in five days. We were seventh in Abu Dhabi, we were ninth in Austin so I think around those positions should be the normal for here but hopefully we can do a better job.

    Q: (Rodrigo Gini – Estado de Minas) Sebastian, in 2010 you needed to attack to win the championship and last year it was so easy, perhaps one can say. This year, you have an advantage to defend. Does it change your mental approach to the race, or will you take it as any other? 
    SV:
     I think the secret is to take it as any other. If you look in the calendar, Brazil is a race like every other one. You get the same amount of points and I think we are here to attack. Obviously we know that we are in a good position. Obviously, as I said, it’s something we know but still we have to be – as I said before – sharp and ready to attack.

    Q: (Manuel Franco Pernal – Diario AS) Fernando and Seb, if you finally win this title, will it be the most simple for you?
    FA:
     Not really. I think winning the championship is always winning the championship. They all feel different, they all can feel special but I don’t think there is one that becomes more important for you, or more special so I think it will be nice but nothing bigger than the other two.
    SV: I think the man to ask sits in the middle. He has won more than two times. For us, for Fernando and me, it’s the same with two championships and maybe a third, so we will see after this weekend but I don’t think it makes sense to talk about it now and therefore, as I said, maybe Michael is the one to ask. He can chose from a variation of titles.
    MS: I think the question was slightly different: whether this is the important one? Whichever one you win the latest one is the most sweet one.

    Q: (Toni Lopez Jorda – La Vanguardia) One question for Sebastian and Fernando: at this point of the championship, looking at the whole season, do you feel that you had good luck or bad luck to arrive in this situation, with a gap of ten points? 
    SV:
     Well I think we have so many races this year, 20 races, some of them you might have a bit of luck; others you might have bad luck but I think it’s the same probably for all of us, if you look over the course of 20 races. Sometimes it might feel this way or that way, but I think it evens out until the end.
    FA: Yeah, it’s up and downs for everyone. We have more or less two or three retirements for each of us, fighting for the championship until the end and those retirements were sometimes for mechanical problems, sometimes for accidents, sometimes they were bad luck but at the end of the day this is normal and we see what happens here.

     

    Copyright. 2012. F1.com All Rights Reserved

  • False image of India during Diwali versus the real thing

    False image of India during Diwali versus the real thing. I did post the misleading and disingenuous photograph on my Facebook, and a friend from India put me straight on what was happening. This explains the entire dust up. That is so cool, that my friend caught my mistake, and helped me to accurately and authoritatively correct the error 

    Diwali is a Hindu festival of lights.
    Diwali is a Hindu festival of lights.
     

    Extra light produced during the Hindu festival of Diwali is so subtle that space images don’t show it.

     

    The five-day Hindu festival Diwali celebrates the victory of Good over the Evil and Light over Darkness. It also marks the beginning of the Hindu New Year. Lighting lamps, candles, and fireworks are a big part of Diwali. It’s a celebration of light! But can you see those celebratory lights from space? The answer is no. NASA says the extra light produced during Diwali is so subtle that space images don’t show it. This post is about a real satellite image of India during Diwali, versus a false one that’s been circulating on the Internet for a few years, especially around the time of the Diwali festival.

    Real satellite image of India, taken at the time of the 2012 Diwali festival. Image acquired November 12, 2012, made possible here via NASA’s Earth Observatory.

    This year’s Diwali started on November 11, 2012. The image above – which has been artificially brightened – shows what India looked like from space on the night of November 12, 2012. It’s what India looks like from space on any night, according to NASA.

    This image is from a NASA satellite known as Suomi NPP, for National Polar-orbiting Partnership. An instrument carried on this satellite – which detects light in a range of wavelengths from green to near-infrared – acquired this image in a single night. The image has been brightened to make the city lights easier to distinguish.

    Most of the bright areas are cities and towns in India, which is home to more than 1.2 billion people and has at least 30 cities with populations over 1 million. Cities in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan are also visible near the edges of the image.

    This image of India has been circulating on the Internet for years. Some claim it shows India during Diwali, but it does not. It’s a real satellite image alright, but it’s composite image, with several different years of lighting combined together. Image via U.S. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program

    In contrast, here is the false Diwali image, which has been circulating via the Internet for some years. It doesn’t show what it claims to show; that is, it doesn’t show India on a single night during the Diwali festival.

    This image comes from satellite data, too, but not a single satellite on a single night. It’s based on data from U.S. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellites, and it’s a color-composite created in 2003 by NOAA scientist Chris Elvidge to highlight population growth over time. In this image, white areas show city lights that were visible prior to 1992, while blue, green, and red shades indicate city lights that became visible in 1992, 1998, and 2003 respectively.

    Bottom line: This post contains a real space image of India, taken during the 2012 Diwali festival. The image is shown in contrast to another space image – a composite, put together with data taken over many years – which has circulated in recent years. The composite image does not show India during Diwali. NASA says the extra light so many enjoy during Diwali would not be visible from space.

     

     

    Copyright © 2012 Earthsky Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved

  • FACT SHEET On The U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership For A Sustainable Energy

    FACT SHEET On The U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership For A Sustainable Energy

     

    Recognizing that energy and the environment are among the most pressing issues confronting our region, President Obama, in partnership with Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei and President of the Republic of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, today proposed the U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership for a Sustainable Energy Future.  The Partnership will offer a framework for consolidating and expanding energy and environmental cooperation across existing regional forums to advance efforts to ensure affordable, secure, and cleaner energy supplies for the region.  Bilateral and multilateral energy and environmental initiatives are flourishing in the Asia Pacific, and the United States, in partnership with Brunei and Indonesia, will help coordinate and enhance these efforts, share best practices, and leverage existing initiatives across the various forums that undertake this work. 

    The Partnership will build upon the existing energy initiatives in the region, including the ASEAN-United States Energy Cooperation Work Plan, the APEC Energy Working Group, the East Asia Summit Energy Ministers and other forums to expand practical cooperation across the region, promote greater energy connectivity and integration, and encourage collaborative work across these and other forums, including through joint capacity building efforts.  

    The Partnership will drive investment and facilitate progress on four key regional priorities: renewables and cleaner energy; markets and interconnectivity; the emerging role of natural gas; and sustainable development.  We will engage with the private sector as well as partner countries in the region to determine specific projects within these four priority areas.  We will work closely with the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank to enhance their work in the region on these issues.  With an estimated $9 trillion needed in investment in electricity alone through 2035 to meet growing demand in the region, there is enormous potential for U.S. Industry to play an important role in the region’s energy future. 

    The United States will provide up to $6 billion to support the Partnership including:

    • The Export-Import Bank of the United States will launch a program to make available up to $5 billion in export credit financing to eligible countries in the region over the next four years to increase access to American technology, services and equipment for the implementation of energy infrastructure projects;
    • OPIC will provide up to $1 billion in financing for sustainable power and energy infrastructure projects.
    • U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA) will support programs in partner countries in the areas of power generation, power distribution modernization, assistance with upgrading grid efficiencies to accommodate renewable power, and unconventional gas development.  
    • The U.S. State Department will oversee a $1 million energy capacity-building fund to support partnership activities via project preparation and technical assistance.  

    Recognizing the key roles in the coming year of Brunei as it assumes Chair of ASEAN and the East Asia Summit, and of Indonesia as it takes up the Chair of APEC, President Obama looks forward to working closely with both countries as well as the range of partners across the region to advance energy and sustainability cooperation.
     

  • The Petraeus Scandal Unravelled

    By DEVLIN BARRETTEVAN PEREZ and SIOBHAN GORMAN

    WASHINGTON—A federal agent who launched the investigation that ultimately led to the resignation of Central Intelligence Agency chief David Petraeus was barred from taking part in the case over the summer due to superiors’ concerns that he was personally involved in the case, according to officials familiar with the probe.

    After the discovery of allegedly inappropriate e-mails between Marine Gen. John Allen and a Tampa woman, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta asked the Senate to put on hold the confirmation of the top commander in Afghanistan. Photo: Getty Images.

    After being blocked from the case, the agent continued to press the matter, relaying his concerns to a member of Congress, the officials said.

    New details about how the Federal Bureau of Investigation handled the case suggest that even as the bureau delved into Mr. Petraeus’s personal life, the agency had to address conduct by its own agent—who allegedly sent shirtless photos of himself to a woman involved in the case prior to the investigation.

    FBI officials declined to identify the agent, so he couldn’t be reached to give his side of the story. The agent is now under investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility, the internal-affairs arm of the FBI, according to two officials familiar with the matter.

    The revelations address how the investigation first began and ultimately led to Mr. Petraeus’s downfall as director of the CIA. The new developments also raise questions about the role played by the FBI and the adequacy of notification to administration and congressional leaders about the scandal.

    The FBI agent who started the case was a friend of Jill Kelley, the Tampa woman who received harassing, anonymous emails that led to the probe, according to officials. Ms. Kelley, a volunteer who organizes social events for military personnel in the Tampa area, complained in May about the emails to a friend who is an FBI agent. That agent referred it to a cyber crimes unit, which opened an investigation.

    However, supervisors soon became concerned that the initial agent might have grown obsessed with the matter, and prohibited him from any role in the investigation, according to the officials.

    One official said the agent in question sent shirtless photos to Ms. Kelley well before the email investigation began, and FBI officials only became aware of them some time later. Eventually, supervisors told the agent he was to have nothing to do with the case, though he never had a formal role in the investigation, the official said.

    A State Department official’s complaints about email stalking launched the months-long criminal inquiry that led to a woman romantically linked to former Gen. David Petraeus and to his abrupt resignation Friday as CIA chief. Photo: REUTERS.

    The Charlotte Observer/Associated Press

    Paula Broadwell, at the center of the Petraeus case, poses with her biography of the former CIA Chief in January.

    Associated Press

    Jill Kelley leaves her house Monday.

    The agent, after being barred from the case, contacted a member of Congress, Washington Republican David Reichert, because he was concerned senior FBI officials were going to sweep the matter under the rug, the officials said. That information was relayed to top congressional officials, who notified FBI headquarters in Washington.

    By that point, FBI agents had determined the harassing emails had been sent by Paula Broadwell, who had written a biography of Mr. Petraeus’s military command.

    Investigators had also determined that Ms. Broadwell had been having an affair with Mr. Petraeus, and that the emails suggested Ms. Broadwell was suspicious of Ms. Kelley’s attention to Mr. Petraeus, officials said.

    The accusatory emails, according to officials, were sent anonymously to an account shared by Ms. Kelley and her husband. Ms. Broadwell allegedly used a variety of email addresses to send the harassing messages to Ms. Kelley, officials said.

    One asked if Ms. Kelley’s husband was aware of her actions, according to officials. In another, the anonymous writer claimed to have watched Ms. Kelley touching “him” provocatively underneath a table, the officials said.

    The message was referring to Mr. Petraeus, but that wasn’t clear at the time, officials said. A lawyer for Ms. Kelley didn’t respond to messages Monday seeking comment on the anonymous emails or on the alleged emails from the FBI agent. A lawyer for Ms. Broadwell also didn’t respond. Neither woman has replied to requests to speak about the matter.

    By then, what began as a relatively simple cyberstalking case had ballooned into a national security investigation. Mr. Petraeus and Ms. Broadwell, both of them married, had set up private Gmail accounts to contact each other, according to several officials familiar with the investigation. The FBI at one point was concerned the CIA director’s email had been accessed by outsiders.

    After agents interviewed Ms. Broadwell, she let them examine her computer, where they found copies of classified documents, according to the officials. Both Mr. Petraeus and Ms. Broadwell denied that he had given her the documents, and FBI officials eventually concluded they had no evidence to suggest otherwise.

    Even as the probe of the relationship between Mr. Petraeus and Ms. Broadwell intensified in late summer and early fall, authorities were able to eventually rule out a security breach, though intelligence officials became concerned Mr. Petraeus had left himself exposed to possible blackmail, according to officials.

    On Monday night, reporters watching Ms. Broadwell’s home in Charlotte, N.C., saw federal agents conduct what appeared to be a search. An FBI spokeswoman confirmed agents were at the home but declined to say what they were doing.

    A day after the Nov. 6 election, intelligence officials presented their findings to the White House. Mr. Petraeus met with White House officials last Thursday and announced his resignation the following day.

    Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have questioned whether Mr. Petraeus needed to resign over the affair, and some have argued that the FBI should have alerted both the White House and Congress much earlier to the potential security implications surrounding Mr. Petraeus.

    In a separate twist in the tangled matter of Mr. Petraeus’s resignation, the CIA disputed a theory advanced by Ms. Broadwell that insurgents may have attacked the U.S. consulate and a CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11 in a bid to free militants being held there by the agency. Ms. Broadwell suggested that rationale for the consulate attack in an address at the University of Denver on Oct. 26.

    “I don’t know if a lot of you had heard this, but the CIA annex had actually taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner and they think the attack on the consulate was an attempt to get these prisoners back,” she said then. “It’s still being vetted.”

    A CIA spokesman said there were no militant prisoners there, noting that President Barack Obama ended CIA authority to hold detainees in 2009. “Any suggestion that the agency is still in the detention business is uninformed and baseless,” said the spokesperson.

    Some critics pointed to Ms. Broadwell’s remarks in Denver as an indication that she may have been passing on classified information, leading to speculation that Mr. Petraeus may have been the source. Based on descriptions by U.S. officials, the romantic relationship had ended by then.

    In addition, the source of her comment may not have been intelligence information, but news reports. Earlier in her address, she cited findings of a report that day by Fox News. Immediately after, she mentioned the possibility that the CIA had held militants at the site, which the Fox report also mentioned.

    The Sept. 11 consulate attack resulted in the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. One person briefed on U.S. intelligence said that reports focused on two main motives for the attack: inspiration from the violent protest that day at the U.S. embassy in Cairo, and the exhortation of al Qaeda leader Ayman al Zawahiri to avenge the death of his second in command. The possibility of attackers trying to free detainees never came up, this person said.

    This week, lawmakers are slated to receive a series of closed-door briefings on both Benghazi and the FBI investigation that turned up the affair between Mr. Petraeus and Ms. Broadwell. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has one such briefing on Benghazi scheduled Tuesday. On Wednesday, leaders of the House intelligence committee—Rep. Michael Rogers, a Michigan Republican who chairs the panel and Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the top Democrat—will be briefed by FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce and acting CIA director Michael Morell.

    Senate intelligence committee staffers are working to schedule similar briefings. On Thursday, both the House and Senate intelligence committees were already slated to receive testimony on Benghazi from top intelligence and law-enforcement officials. The investigation that uncovered the affair is now expected to also be a central issue at those hearings, which won’t be public.

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.), who chairs the Senate intelligence committee complained Sunday that she and her colleagues should have been told of the Petraeus-Broadwell affair when the FBI discovered it because of national-security concerns.

    Write to Devlin Barrett at devlin.barrett@wsj.com, Evan Perez atevan.perez@wsj.com and Siobhan Gorman at siobhan.gorman@wsj.com

    A version of this article appeared November 13, 2012, on page A1 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: FBI Agent In Petraeus Case Under Scrutiny.

  • Facebook Is Quietly Ramping Up A Product That ‘Kills Us,’ Says Yahoo Source

    Facebook Is Quietly Ramping Up A Product That ‘Kills Us,’ Says Yahoo Source Nicholas Carlson | Nov. 16, 2012, 12:59 PM | 41,011 | 62 inShare 455 Email More nandorfejer “There’s a story brewing about a next very big business it’s building – one that competes with one of Yahoo’s flagship ad products and would kill us.” FBNov 16 08:00PM 23.56 Change +1.39 % Change +6.27% YHOONov 16 08:00PM 17.86 Change -0.03 % Change -0.17% See Also Chase Coleman Picked Up Massive Stakes In Groupon And Yahoo, Loaded Up On Facebook Here’s What Facebook’s Next 3 Ad Products Will Look Like Now Accel Partners Is Handing Out Its Facebook Shares A Yahoo source reached us the other day to say this about Facebook: “There’s a story brewing about a next very big business it’s building—one that competes with one of Yahoo’s flagship ad products and would kill us.” Yahoo is one of the biggest ad sellers on the Web, with $5 billion in annual revenue. If a big portion of that money moved to Facebook, that’d be big news. So we found out more. It turns out what Facebook is doing is pretty simple, but powerful. It has come up with a way to prove to marketers that there is a type of online advertising besides Google search ads that is worth spending large amounts of money on. It’s the result of a partnership with an upstart Nielsen competitor out of Denver called Datalogix. Facebook has been ramping it up over the past several weeks. Here is how online brand advertising currently works: A marketer puts a picture of their product and some eye-catching, memorable text about it on a bunch of Websites. Consumers go to those Websites. Some of them see the ads. Fewer of them click on the ads. Some unknown percentage of the users who saw the ads go out and buy the marketer’s product after having seen the ad. Nobody really knows how many. The marketer counts the clicks and looks at broad sales trends before and after the ads launched to determine if they worked. Sometimes marketers commission surveys to find out if their brand has become more recognizable and memorable. Here is how Facebook’s new product works: A marketer puts a picture of their product and some eye-catching, memorable text about it on Facebook (or, in the near future, sites that are partnering with Facebook). Consumers go to those Facebook pages. Some see the ads. Some click on them. Some percentage of the users who saw the ads go out and buy the marketer’s product after having seen the ad. As the marketer’s product is sold, the retailer takes note of the shopper’s email address, home address and phone number (which are already on file through loyalty programs and the like). Facebook, which has the email addresses, home addresses, and phone numbers of about billion people, checks its logs to see if its user with that information saw an ad from the marketer pushing that product. (NOTE: Facebook, retailers, and Datalogix do this through a series of double-blind procedures using “hashed identifiers” that entirely protect user anonymity. Hashes are bits of text that uniquely identify a piece of data, such as contact info, but are designed to protect against reverse engineering which would reveal that data.) Facebook delivers an anonymized report to the marketer, telling them what percentage of people who saw their ad on Facebook went out and bought the advertised product. Instead of looking at unreliable clicks, surveys, and sales trends, marketers can look at that report and do a simple return-on-investment calculation based on how many people saw the ad and how many of those people went out and bought the product advertised. Our source says this new Facebook product “closes the loop” on brand advertising in a way that no site besides Facebook is able. This source gave three reasons Facebook can do this and no one else, including Yahoo, can: Scale, scale, and scale. No one has more brand advertisers already on board than Facebook. (Yahoo and some others may have as many brands). No one has as many users looking at brand ads as Facebook does. No one has all of the email addresses of the users looking at its Facebook ads the way Facebook does. This source said that Yahoo has a similar product it offers advertisers, and that it generates revenues around $500 million. This source estimates that Facebook could do multiples of that. Facebook knows it is onto something huge here. The best evidence? Our source says the rumor is that Facebook has, as a part of its massive deal with Datalogix, secured the right to be notified should any suitors come by, looking to acquire. Facebook formally launched a similar product along these lines for online retailers and direct marketers today. Facebook declined to comment on this story. Don’t miss: 15 Google Interview Questions That Made Geniuses Feel Dumb Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-is-quietly-ramping-up-a-product-that-kills-us-says-yahoo-source-2012-11#ixzz2Cc7czpXN

  • Petraeus scandal puts four-star general lifestyle under scrutiny

    View Photo Gallery — The David Petraeus scandal: Cast of characters: A scandal that began with the relationship between retired Gen. David Petraeus, the director of the CIA, and his biographer, Paula Broadwell, has mushroomed. Here’s a look at the people mentioned in the case.

    Among the new information uncovered by the Post’s Greg Jaffe and Anne Gearan, the Petraeus biographer was asked to leave her doctoral program at Harvard and apparently mistated her accomplishments at West Point.

    Among the new information uncovered by the Post’s Greg Jaffe and Anne Gearan, the Petraeus biographer was asked to leave her doctoral program at Harvard and apparently misstated her accomplishments at West Point.

    Petraeus scandal puts four-star general lifestyle under scrutiny

    By Rajiv Chandrasekaran and Greg JaffeSaturday, November 17, 5:29 PM

    Then-defense secretary Robert M. Gates stopped bagging his leaves when he moved into a small Washington military enclave in 2007. His next-door neighbor was Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, who had a chef, a personal valet and — not lost on Gates — troops to tend his property.

    Gates may have been the civilian leader of the world’s largest military, but his position did not come with household staff. So, he often joked, he disposed of his leaves by blowing them onto the chairman’s lawn.

    “I was often jealous because he had four enlisted people helping him all the time,” Gates said in response to a question after a speech Thursday. He wryly complained to his wife that “Mullen’s got guys over there who are fixing meals for him, and I’m shoving something into the microwave. And I’m his boss.”

    Of the many facts that have come to light in the scandal involving former CIA director David H. Petraeus, among the most curious was that during his days as a four-star general, he was once escorted by 28 police motorcycles as he traveled from his Central Command headquarters in Tampa to socialite Jill Kelley’s mansion. Although most of his trips did not involve a presidential-size convoy, the scandal has prompted new scrutiny of the imperial trappings that come with a senior general’s lifestyle.

    The commanders who lead the nation’s military services and those who oversee troops around the world enjoy an array of perquisites befitting a billionaire, including executive jets, palatial homes, drivers, security guards and aides to carry their bags, press their uniforms and track their schedules in 10-minute increments. Their food is prepared by gourmet chefs. If they want music with their dinner parties, their staff can summon a string quartet or a choir.

    The elite regional commanders who preside over large swaths of the planet don’t have to settle for Gulfstream V jets. They each have a C-40, the military equivalent of a Boeing 737, some of which are configured with beds.

    Since Petraeus’s resignation, many have strained to understand how such a celebrated general could have behaved so badly. Some have speculated that an exhausting decade of war impaired his judgment. Others wondered if Petraeus was never the Boy Scout he appeared to be. But Gates, who still possesses a modest Kansan’s bemusement at Washington excess, has floated another theory.

    “There is something about a sense of entitlement and of having great power that skews people’s judgment,” Gates said last week.

    Among the Army’s general officer corps, however, there is little support for Gates’s hypothesis. “I love the man. I am his biggest supporter. But I strongly disagree,” said retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli, who served as Gates’s senior military assistant. “I find it concerning that he and others are not focusing on the effect on our guys of fighting wars for 11 years. No one was at it longer than Petraeus.”

    Other veteran commanders concurred with Gates. David Barno, a retired three-star general who commanded U.S. troops in Afghanistan, warned in an interview that the environment in which the top brass lives has the potential “to become corrosive over time upon how they live their life.”

    “You can become completely disconnected from the way people live in the regular world — and even from the modest lifestyle of others in the military,” Barno said. “When that happens, it’s not necessarily healthy either for the military or the country.”

    Although American generals have long enjoyed many perks — in World War II and in Vietnam, some dined on china set atop linen tablecloths — the amenities afforded to today’s military leaders are more lavish than anyone else in government enjoys, save for the president.

    The benefits have not generated much attention among a public that has long revered its generals as protectors of the nation and moral beacons. And no general has been revered more than Petraeus, a fact that Mullen remarked upon at his retirement ceremony.

    He joked that a woman approached him at a dinner party, eyed his medals and asked him if he was somebody important. “I’m the president’s top military adviser,” he replied.

    “Oh my goodness, General Petraeus,” the woman said to Mullen. “I’m so sorry. I just didn’t recognize you.”

    Petraeus cultivated his fame by grasping, before most of his comrades, how the narrative of modern warfare is shaped not just on the battlefield but among the chattering class back home. He invited book authors to accompany him, granted frequent interviews to journalists, fostered close relationships with Washington think tanks and embraced political leaders on both sides of the aisle. When President George W. Bush needed a savior for the foundering war in Iraq, he turned to Petraeus, making him the frontman for the troop surge in Baghdad. In the first six months of 2007, Bush mentioned Petraeus’s name 150 times in speeches.

    Petraeus did not disappoint. Violence dropped in Iraq after he became the top commander there. He returned home as a celebrity. In 2009, he was asked to flip the coin at the Super Bowl.

    He became an A-list guest at Washington parties. His stardom, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a collective guilt among civilians disconnected from the conflicts all helped to raise the profile for his fellow generals. It wasn’t just Jill Kelley, the Tampa woman who cultivated close relationships with him and other generals, including Gen. John R. Allen, the top commander in Afghanistan, by throwing lavish parties at her million-dollar house. Hostesses around the nation delighted at the presence of commanders in full-dress uniforms at social events.

    The adulation fit their lifestyle.

    “Being a four-star commander in a combat theater is like being a combination of Bill Gates and Jay-Z — with enormous firepower added,” said Thomas E. Ricks, the author of “The Generals,” a recently published history of American commanders since World War II.

    Many of the gatherings have been genuinely altruistic; community and business leaders have pitched in to help raise money to support wounded troops and military families. But others, it seems, hoped a general or two sprinkled among canape-munching guests would bring elevated social status.

    In some cases, the generals, who have spent much of their professional lives in cloistered military bubbles, have not employed the best judgment in cultivating relationships with those who enjoy the sparkle of stars on the shoulder. Allen exchanged hundreds — perhaps even thousands — of e-mails with Kelley over the past four years, a fact discovered in the FBI investigation into harassing messages sent by Petraeus’s former mistress and biographer, Paula Broadwell, to Kelley. The Defense Department is now investigating the messages Allen and Kelley exchanged.

    Some retired generals have defended the benefits accorded to their active-duty brethren, noting that many of them work 18-hour days, six to seven days a week. They manage budgets that dwarf those of large multinational companies and are responsible for the lives of thousands of young men and women under their command.

    Compared with today’s plutocrats, their pay is modest. In 2013, the base salary for a four-star general with at least 38 years of service will be almost $235,000, although federal personnel regulations limit their take-home pay to $179,700. Unlike top civilians in government, top generals also receive free housing and subsidies for food and uniforms. And when they retire, those who have served at least 40 years get an annual pension that is slightly more than active-duty base pay — this year it is $236,650.

    Several generals noted that perks, such as planes, cars and staff aides, are constrained by hundreds of pages of rules designed to ensure that they are used only for government business.

    But the frantic search for cuts to reduce the growth of government debt could soon put some of the four-star benefits at risk. When he was at the Pentagon, Gates wanted to trim some of the perks but ran into resistance. It was, he said, the “third rail” of the Defense Department.

    “You don’t need a cadre of people at your beck and call in an age of austerity, unless you are a field commander in Iraq or Afghanistan,” a former top aide to Gates said on the condition of anonymity.

    The travel practices of two theater commanders, which prompted Pentagon investigations this year, may further jeopardize the perks.

    When he was former head of the U.S. Africa Command, Army Gen. William “Kip” Ward spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars for private travel, including using military vehicles to shuttle his wife on shopping trips and to a spa, according to a report by the Defense Department’s inspector general. The report detailed lengthy stays at lavish hotels for Ward, his wife and his staff members — he billed the government for a refueling stop overnight in Bermuda, where the couple stayed in a $750 suite — and the use of five-vehicle motorcades when he traveled in Washington. The report also said Ward often took longer-than-necessary business trips to the United States, resulting in “exponential” increases in costs.

    The current top U.S. commander in Europe, Adm. James Stavridis, also came under the scrutiny of the inspector general for using a military jet to fly to the Burgundy region of France for a dinner organized by an international society of wine enthusiasts. Stavridis defended the trip as an opportunity to meet with French military and business leaders.

    He was cleared of wrongdoing by Navy Secretary Ray Mabus this month. Ward, however, was not so fortunate. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta announced last week that Ward would be demoted and forced to retire at a three-star rank. He also will have to repay the government $82,000, but he still will receive a $208,000-a-year pension.

    Peter Feaver, a National Security Council official in the Bush administration, defended the generals’ need for perks and large staffs, noting that when they entertain foreign dignitaries they are bound by military standards of pageantry and protocol that don’t exist in the State Department.

    “The military is trapped in an older cultural time warp,” Feaver said.

    But he worried that the recent high-profile excesses could chip away at the military’s credibility. There’s a sentiment among the ranks that generals are out of touch, he said.

    “This provides fuel for that kind of critique,” he said. “It can do damage to the institution.”

     

    Copyright. 2012. The Washington Post Company. All Rights Reserved

     

     

     

     

     

  • All Eyes On Austin. As The World Formula 1 Grand Prix Championship Returns To The United States.

    MATCHETT: All Eyes On Austin
    It is a tremendous accomplishment for Formula 1 to have a purpose-built facility in the United States…
    Steve Matchett  |  Posted November 16, 2012   Austin, TX
     

    The view from the outside of Turn 1 back to the Start/Finish line at the Circuit of the Americas, Austin, Texas. (Photo: LAT Photographic)

     

     

    Advertisement

    The moment we’ve all been hoping and waiting for since Formula 1 left the United States five years ago finally is upon us. Formula 1 competes at the gleaming new Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas, on Sunday, and the hype surrounding this inaugural event has been remarkable.

    It is not mere hype, though. In fact, the significance of this weekend’s event can’t be overstated in light of the facility’s majesty, the passion of American fans and the importance of corporate marketing to America.

    If Formula 1 desires to portray itself as staging a genuine world championship, hosting a round in the United States is essential because of the country’s multi-faceted importance across the globe, particularly in the marketplace. Every company wants to sell its product in America. Throughout history, all corporations and marketing departments associated with Formula 1 have longed to break into America for sales, whether the Beatles or BMW, so the realization of an American grandprix is a mammoth business opportunity for the series and teams to gain a solid foothold upon which to build.

    Additionally, American Formula 1 fans are solid and knowledgeable fans with a deep appreciation of the sport. The U.S. Grand Prix won’t play out before tens of thousands of yawning and disinterested spectators unimpressed by the spectacle to which they are witnesses. American Formula 1 fans love the series, and when I interact with them on Twitter and through email, I perpetually am struck by their passion for and knowledge of the sport. America boasts an abundance of good domestic auto racing, so there is no shortage of motor racing distractions and options for its racing audience. But the Formula 1 fans in America are committed ones, which is terrific to see.

    It also is a tremendous accomplishment for Formula 1 to have a purpose-built facility in the United States. In the past, we have competed on pre-existing courses not built with the sport in mind. For example, the last U.S. Grand Prix at Indianapolis Motor Speedway spanned a large section of the historical oval track so steeped in oval racing. As special as competing on the hallowed ground at Indy was, Formula 1 needed a purpose-built track to challenge the characteristics of its machinery, and the Circuit of the Americas offers just that. The track was designed from a blank sheet of paper and carefully drawn to extract superior racing from these machines. Expect the drivers, mechanics, engineers and cars all to be challenged to the utmost degree throughout the weekend. 

    Austin features elevation changes – something Indy doesn’t – and the motion of the cars maneuvering up and down presents a great challenge because it affects the way the chassis work. Elevation changes also impact the engineering and aerodynamics of the cars, forcing drivers to quickly scramble to understand how to control their cars not only through lateral-load shifting but also through vertical-load shifting as they navigate turn one.

    Since the Circuit of the Americas is a brand-spanking new facility, it is difficult to predict which driver or team could possess an advantage or how the race might play out. However, we can look to Suzuka for a bit of a comparison. In fact, it appears the Austin track has taken some design criteria from the Suzuka model with respect to its esses. Suzuka’s esses are a fabulous series of corners that have lent many drivers and teams to thoroughly enjoy the competition it fosters. Austin is quite reminiscent of the Japanese track in this regard. 

    While teams walk into Austin with a blank notebook, so to speak, they can look to Suzuka as an example of how to set up their cars in terms of chassis handling because of Austin’s subtle series of esses after turn one. At Suzuka, if teams can’t get the car to work well through that section of the track, they historically cannot derive a good lap time out of it. Navigating well through the esses is paramount, while everything else is of secondary consideration. I could be proven wrong this weekend, but I think setting up the car for the esses after turn one will be of primary interest to the engineers before determining how much wing to carry for the long straights. 

    With those long straights, tight corners, heavy braking zones and good acceleration zones, coupled with the spectacular esses, every portion of the Circuit of the Americas should pose a great challenge for the teams. Factors such as these almost always produce great competition, and with a majestically sparkling, first-class American facility, the stage is set for a remarkable and unforgettable return of Formula 1 to the United States. 

    The opinions reflected herein are solely those of the above commentator and are not necessarily those of SPEED.com, FOX, NewsCorp, or SPEED

     
    Copyright 2012.Speed Channel.com All Rights Reserved