February 11, 2007

  • Secret of Love Is …

    David Chelsea
    February 11, 2007
    Modern Love

    Dear Editor, the Secret of Love Is …

    EACH year, as the day nears when we are expected to celebrate (or at least positively spin) the current state of our romantic lives, people start asking me what I, as the editor of this column, have learned about love. Surely, they assume, I’ve learned something from spending my days immersed in strangers’ relationship stories. But whenever this seeming softball of a question comes hurtling at me, my mind goes blank.

    In need of an answer, I sift through hundreds of essays submitted for the column, searching for trends, clues, even a measly tip or two. This year, I relived the oddity of the middle-aged woman who couldn’t decide when best to inform her dates that she’s never had sex, and of the man who faced a similar quandary when it came to disclosing that he has only one testicle. I read cheery stories of those who found love only after giving up, and darker tales of philandering husbands, rebellious children, stalking lovers, flirtatious doctors and baffling breakups.

    In these accounts I found exactly one common thread: Wisdom about love is sorely lacking. Over the millennia we Homo sapiens, with our ever-evolving intelligence and sensibilities, have made great strides on many fronts (human rights! space travel!), but when it comes to love, we don’t seem to evolve so much as revolve.

    Given this history of futility, maybe we should stop asking each other what we have learned about love. The better question is: In what new and creative ways have we failed to learn? That I can answer. So here, with gratitude to the thousands of writers who every year send me their confessions of doubt and disorder, I offer my thoughts on those areas where we have made no discernible progress in learning about love since last Valentine’s Day.

    1. HOW TO AVOID FEELING JEALOUS OVER REALLY DUMB THINGS

    This year I heard from several wives who claim to be jealous of the relationship their husbands have with the woman’s voice on the car’s navigation device. Not only is it strangely seductive and somehow more sophisticated than the wife’s voice, it also provides flawless directions, an ability it unfairly flaunts to gain the husband’s admiration and trust. How, these wives wonder, are they supposed to compete with a dashboard dominatrix who has her own built-in Global Positioning System? And how are they to feel when their husbands shush them so they can better hear the advice of their leather-bound mistress of the console?

    2. HOW TO REMEMBER THAT WHEREVER YOU GO, THERE YOU ARE

    Online communities like SecondLife allow members to create animated versions of themselves called avatars that can go on dates, fly, carouse, even engage in prostitution. Theodora Stites wrote vividly in this space about how she conducts much of her romantic life this way and confessed to enlarging her avatar’s chest and perfecting its features to attract suitable male avatars.

    You might assume that on SecondLife you are protected from the emotional upheaval of real relationships because the animated couplings tend to be, well, fake. But here’s the catch: They’re not fake. It’s still you behind the screen and you who is being accepted or rejected, with all the attendant joy and pain. As Theodora explained, “I’ve found that I act much as I do in real life, and my SecondLife relationships tend to fail the same way my real-life relationships do.”

    3. HOW TO EMBRACE THE NO-FAULT BREAKUP

    There surely is plenty of blame to go around in most breakups, but that’s not the way we tend to see it. We tend to believe only one person is at fault. The other person. Especially when that person is a man. Please don’t shoot the messenger on this one; I’m simply telling you what I have observed.

    Among the truckloads of divorce and breakup stories I’ve received, the prevailing sentiment is that the man is either at fault or too incommunicative for fault to be properly established. What’s more, even the men blame the men.

    “He was a jerk,” the women say. “He didn’t know what he wanted.”

    “I was a jerk,” the men say. “I didn’t know what I wanted.”

    Can the world actually be this tilted, or is that just how we choose to write about it? Are women apt to publicly seethe while men prefer to seethe in private? Or is it more acceptable for women to complain about men than the reverse? If you know the answer, send it to modernlove@nytimes.com, and together we’ll bust this case wide open.

    4. HOW TO HAVE SEX IF YOU’RE A SEX COLUMNIST

    This seemed to be the year of hearing from sex columnists who aren’t having sex. In case you didn’t know, it’s really embarrassing to be a sex columnist who isn’t having sex. The anxiety is three-fold: First, what am I supposed to write about if I’m not having sex? Second, how am I supposed to have any credibility? And third, why is this happening to me, anyway?

    5. HOW TO FIND A LASTING RELATIONSHIP FOR YOURSELF IF YOU’RE A DATING COACH

    Same as above, substituting dating coach for sex columnist and dates for sex.

    6. HOW TO GET MARRIED WHILE REMAINING SINGLE

    Hardly a week passes when I don’t hear from someone stewing about the anticipated gains and losses of marriage: how to handle the last name, the loss of personal space and identity, the permanent end to sex with others, the problematic vocabulary (“wife,” “husband,” “until death”), the merging of finances and religions, the issue of marrying when gays can’t, the questionable necessity of marriage in the first place.

    Amid all this agonizing, I also hear of creative solutions, such as having an open marriage and sleeping with whomever you want, putting a Star of David atop your Christmas tree, and maintaining separate bedrooms or houses. As for the last-name problem, you could always try the technique of one enterprising couple: let your dog make the decision by building a contraption rigged with treats and levers that old Spot nudges with his nose during your actual wedding ceremony to select the name you, your spouse and your future children will have for the rest of your lives.

    7. HOW TO BECOME A PARENT WHILE REMAINING CHILDLESS

    From what I’ve observed, the real before-and-after divide in life is not getting married but having children (or not). The accounts of hand-wringing pour in: flamed-out friendships when one has a child and the other doesn’t, defensiveness from those who decide against but continue to feel pressure, and crushing ambivalence among couples who, year after year, simply can’t decide.

    What are their pros and cons? Wanting a child for the anticipated bond and expansion of love that everyone promises versus the feared curtailing of career opportunities, travel, sleep and leisure, sometimes combined with worries of parental incompetence or of bringing a child into a world that is already overpopulated. But the greatest struggle often involves those couples where one wants a child and the other does not, even when, in some cases, they were in agreement before marrying.

    8. HOW TO MAKE LOVE LIKE A PORN STAR

    Since I’ve heard from only one person in 30 months who even vaguely seemed to make love like a porn star (in the sense that she films herself), it might be safe to assume this kind of activity is not a nationwide trend. But there’s a book out called “How to Make Love Like a Porn Star,” and it has been a huge best seller. So it’s entirely possible that thousands are making love like porn stars but are simply (understandably) not writing essays about it.

    9. HOW TO COMMENT APPROPRIATELY ON YOUR GIRLFRIEND’S APPEARANCE

    One would hope men had figured this one out by now. Yet in an account I received not long ago, a guy mused aloud to his girlfriend (who wrote the piece) about how he must have “grown emotionally” lately because she was the most “full-figured” woman he’d ever dated, and while in the past he wouldn’t have been attracted to such a body type, he had, with her, somehow managed to get over that hurdle.

    But who am I to judge? They are now — you guessed it — married.

    10. HOW TO FINALLY GET OVER THE LINGERING FANTASY OF THAT LONG-LOST LOVE

    In one area, however, we are learning, at least according to various versions of this story that have come my way: You fell in love that summer in college. Or while studying in Rome. Or while milking goats in Bhutan. Whatever the case, your time together was magical, it ended prematurely, and you never forgot. And 20 years later, when the routine of your life (children, work, chores, little sex, no romance, not even a Valentine’s Day card for the spouse on your radar screen) starts to get you down, you find yourself wondering, What kind of glamorous life is he/she leading now? What if that had been my life?

    At long last we are finding out, and we are doing so en masse, courtesy of Google text and image searches, even Google Earth (aerial shot of his house, anyone?). In time, we stumble upon an e-mail address, compose the perfect note, swallow hard and hit send. And soon we’re reading about the amiable husband/wife, the overscheduled children and the unsurprising career, all in a tone that’s breezy, passionless. “But it’s such fun to reconnect,” he/she blathers on. “And wouldn’t it be a scream if the next time we’re in the same city on business we could meet up for a cappuccino?”

    And just like that, for many of us at least, the fantasy evaporates. The grass is not greener. It’s the exact same grass, or maybe even browner. So you log off, stand up, splash water on your face, and stride back into your life with fresh eyes. After all, you love the children you have, not the children you might have had. And the same goes for your spouse, who would never call anything “a scream” and who, for that reason alone, deserves a special card this year, perhaps even chocolates.

    Happy Valentine’s Day.

    Daniel Jones is the editor of Modern Love. His latest book, “Modern Love: 50 True and Extraordinary Tales of Desire, Deceit and Devotion,” a collection of essays from this column, is just out from Three Rivers Press.


     

    Brian Jones/Associated Press

    An Adidas ad featuring the All-Stars Kevin Garnett and Dwight Howard at the Luxor Hotel. Las Vegas is one of the fastest-growing U.S. metropolitan areas without a professional sports team.

    February 11, 2007

    Las Vegas Has Got the Game, but It Wants a Team

    LAS VEGAS, Feb. 9 — Here, where the fountains dance and the stage lights never go dark, where the cheesy and the risqué mingle alongside celebrities to a soundtrack of slot machines, decadence has found a new friend.

    The N.B.A. All-Star Game, the league’s biggest annual party, is about to descend here next weekend. The game, of course, is only an exhibition. But what isn’t in Las Vegas?

    For the first time, a non-N.B.A. city will play host to the All-Star Game. Las Vegas, one of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas (population: 1.9 million) in the country without a professional sports team, wants to showcase itself as worthy of becoming a full-time major league city.

    The odds, however, that the N.B.A. or any other league will soon come to Las Vegas for more than just a vacation — through relocation or expansion — are low. For now.

    David Stern, the N.B.A. commissioner, has made “integrity of the game” his battle cry in the years since the Pacers-Pistons brawl and says that local gambling on the league, though regulated, would violate that tenet. He maintains that casinos must take all N.B.A. games off their oddsmakers’ books before Las Vegas could be a viable site.

    “There’s only one stumbling block,” Stern said in an interview this week, referring to the legalized betting on N.B.A. games. “It has to be off the books for consideration. It is that, more than any other issue.”

    To be sure, the building and financing of a new Las Vegas arena to replace the 23-year-old Thomas & Mack Center could be almost as difficult. Already, arena-financing issues are threatening franchises in Sacramento and Seattle, and, to a lesser degree, Orlando and Milwaukee. Las Vegas could offer an exit strategy for some franchises, but not for the Sacramento Kings.

    Joe Maloof, whose family owns the Kings and operates the thriving Palms Casino Resort in Las Vegas, said he wanted the team to remain in Sacramento.

    “Sooner, rather than later, there’s going to be an N.B.A. team in Las Vegas,” said Maloof, who added that Coach Jerry Tarkanian’s success in the early 1990s at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas made the city a true basketball destination. “It’s one of the great last cities that doesn’t have a franchise, and it needs one.”

    Joe Maloof’s brother George, the owner of the Palms, estimated that there was a 10 percent chance that a professional sports team would move to Las Vegas in the next five years. But the city’s colorful mayor, Oscar Goodman, who likes to promote his city with showgirls on his arm, projected far better odds.

    “Guaranteed — even money,” Goodman said in an interview Friday in his office. “I bet on anything that moves. I’m ready to bet my reputation that we will have serious discussions about getting a major league franchise here in Las Vegas, and these discussions will begin before the spring of this year.”

    Goodman would not say whether it would be an N.B.A. or N.H.L. team, only that it would not be a baseball or football team.

    Major League Baseball did flirt with Las Vegas in 2004 about relocating the Montreal Expos there before eventually deciding on Washington. Officials from the Florida Marlins also met with Goodman in 2004 before Commissioner Bud Selig directed Goodman to stop the talks because baseball wanted the team to remain in South Florida.

    Before the Super Bowl last Sunday, N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell bluntly dismissed Las Vegas as a site. “I have my personal views about gambling, and I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the N.F.L. to have any association with sports betting,” Goodell said.

    The N.F.L., of course, is the professional league that generates the most betting revenue, according to Nevada’s Gaming Control Board.

    Meanwhile, given the N.H.L.’s struggles, perhaps it was not surprising that Bill Daly, the league’s deputy commissioner, said in a telephone interview Friday that the league would have a “flexible approach” toward local betting on the sport if a franchise ended up in Las Vegas.

    Goodman first met with officials from the N.H.L. several years ago. “There’s clearly a return interest,” Daly said, adding that some private parties in Las Vegas were having continuing discussions.

    During the N.B.A. All-Star weekend, by order of Stern and Nevada’s Gaming Control Board, casinos cannot offer betting on the All-Star Game.

    “We’re talking about one basketball game right now, and it’s really an exhibition,” said Chuck Esposito, the assistant vice president for race and sports book operations at Caesars Palace. “There are so many other positives from one game.” But, he added, taking one of the major sports off the casino betting boards on a permanent basis “would have much more of an impact in the industry.”

    As a result, he said, “We’d have to weigh all the pros and cons” of an N.B.A. franchise in Las Vegas.

    Because of the Maloofs’ ownership of the Kings, the Palms cannot have betting on any N.B.A. games, at any time. “It hurts us a little bit,” Joe Maloof said. “We still show the games, but they can’t bet on it.”

    For decades, casinos prohibited betting on U.N.L.V. games, but in 2001 Nevada’s Gaming Control Board reversed the ban. What if the N.B.A. were to accept a partial ban, perhaps only on games that a Las Vegas franchise plays?

    Goodman sees compromise as essential. A trial lawyer who made his reputation defending organized crime bosses in Las Vegas, Goodman is preparing to plead his case to Stern next week. “Hopefully, I can change his mind,” Goodman said. “He’s a smart man.”

    Neither Stern nor his owners appear to be in a hurry to resolve the issue.

    “I don’t know enough of the details about the city to give a final answer, but philosophically I have no problem with the gambling side of it,” Mark Cuban, the Dallas Mavericks‘ owner, wrote in an e-mail message Thursday when asked about the possibility of an N.B.A. team in Las Vegas. “If the economics work, I’m all for it.”

    The Houston Rockets‘ owner, Les Alexander, said: “I think the owners are in favor of it. I don’t see any reason why the N.B.A. wouldn’t be successful in Vegas. It’s a big enough population. The potential for arena suite sales and sponsorships could make it one of the best.”

    The N.B.A. All-Star Game caters precisely to that kind of crowd. Tickets for the game were available to sponsors and to the league’s international partners, but not directly available to fans.

    Sponsors are renting out lavish suites in the Palms, where all the players are staying. Nike has taken over the 10,000-square foot Hardwood Suite in the Palms, complete with a small basketball court and a Jacuzzi.

    Adidas has placed giant screen murals of its stars — Tracy McGrady, Gilbert Arenas, Kevin Garnett, Dwight Howard — on the side of the MGM Grand and Luxor Hotels. Dwyane Wade posts up for T-Mobile on the side of the Mandalay Bay.

    The idea for an N.B.A. All-Star Game in Las Vegas came from the Maloof brothers, who approached Stern. By the summer of 2005, the game was approved by the casinos, the city and the league.

    Stern is excited about Las Vegas’s entertainment value, but he plays down the risk of an image hit for the league in a city known for indiscretion. Of course, more damage might have been done to the N.B.A.’s image in America’s heartland this season when Indiana Pacers players engaged in two late-night incidents at Indianapolis nightclubs.

    “There’s potential in any city,” Stern said. “What we’ve found is that indiscretion knows no geographic boundaries or political boundaries.”

    The N.B.A. is going where gambling is strictly regulated and casinos already have a high level of security and surveillance. City officials are so confident in their ability to play host to major events that Rossi Ralenkotter, the president of the Convention and Visitors Authority, has already talked to Stern about bringing the game back in 2011.

    “I think it is fair to say that this is a test case — for both neutral sites as well as Las Vegas as such a site,” Stern said Friday.

    As for real contests, the N.B.A. is no stranger to Las Vegas. The Utah Jazz played 11 games of its 1983-84 season there while its arena was under construction. During the Los Angeles riots of 1992, a Lakers first-round playoff game against the Portland Trail Blazers was moved there.

    Whether the county government wants to build a new arena for a permanent N.B.A. team is another story.

    Rory Reid, chairman of the Clark County Board of Commissioners, formed a task force with Goodman to determine the necessity and cost of a new arena to lure a franchise to Las Vegas. Reid has dampened Goodman’s enthusiasm lately by declaring that the public should not finance an arena. “It should not be our No. 1 priority,” Reid said, considering the more pressing social welfare and criminal justice issues.

    Despite such potential obstacles, SportsCorp’s Marc Ganis, a consultant who has analyzed relocations for nine franchises, said it was only a matter of time before some league chooses Las Vegas. “Because there is too much of a potential pot of gold for the first one,” Ganis said.

    For now, Las Vegas awaits the N.B.A. family, coming to celebrate the past, present and future of the game.

    Both city and N.B.A. leaders are keeping their fingers crossed that impropriety is kept to a minimum. They are equally curious to see if what happens in Vegas — N.B.A. basketball — will eventually stay there.


    Mark J. Terrill/Associated Press

    Mary J. Blige won the award for best female R&B vocal performance for “Be Without You” at the 49th Annual Grammy Awards. More Photos »

    Mario Anzuoni/Reuters

    The Dixie Chicks received five nominations for their album “Taking the Long Road.” More Photos

    Complete Coverage

    The Grammy Awards

    Links to related reviews by Times critics, audio clips from the Times Music Popcast and selected music clips from nominated artists.


    RelatedPartial List of Grammy Award Winners (February 11, 2007)

    February 12, 2007

    Mary J. Blige, the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Dixie Chicks Win Grammys

    LOS ANGELES, Feb. 11 — On a night when the Police reunited with a scorching rendition of “Roxanne,” Mary J. Blige and the Red Hot Chili Peppers won multiple honors on Sunday at the 49th annual Grammy Awards, the music industry’s lovefest held here.

    But the Recording Academy seemed to spreading the wealth, even handing out ties in two categories, as it bestowed multiple awards to the Dixie Chicks, Justin Timberlake, Bob Dylan, Tony Bennett, Gnarls Barkley, the rapper T. I. and the late jazz great Michael Brecker.

    Soon after the live telecast began on CBS, Ms. Blige’s album “The Breakthrough” (Geffen) won for best R&B album and best female R&B vocal performance, complementing the Grammy she and three co-writers won for “Be Without You” as best R&B song.

    The Red Hot Chili Peppers, whose enduring punk-funk hybrid has recently captured critical acclaim to go along with its longstanding commercial success, took three Grammys before the nationally broadcast show began at the Staples Center (97 of the 108 awards were not televised). It was an auspicious beginning on a night when the band was up for as many as six awards. “Dani California,” set like many of the band’s songs in Los Angeles and its environs, won for best rock performance by a duo or group with vocal and best rock song. The band’s double album “Stadium Arcadium,” the first of that veteran group’s albums to reach No. 1, won best boxed or special limited edition for its double CD.

    Mr. Timberlake, whose album “FutureSex/LoveSounds” (Jive/Zomba Label) was nominated for the most prestigious category of album of the year, won best rap/sung collaboration with T. I. for “My Love,” while he and Timbaland, the go-to producer of the moment, won for best dance song. T. I. also captured the Grammy for best rap solo performance for “What You Know.”

    Mr. Dylan’s “Modern Times” (Columbia) picked up the award for best contemporary folk/Americana album, while Bruce Springsteen‘s “We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions” (Columbia) was named best traditional folk album. Another music-industry veteran, Mr. Bennett, won two early awards, including one for his duet with Stevie Wonder (“For Once in My Life”) in the category of best pop collaboration with vocals. And Mr. Brecker, who died last month, also received two Grammys, for jazz instrumental solo and large jazz ensemble album on his brother Randy’s album, “Best Skunk Funk” (Telarc Jazz/BHM).

    This year’s nominations had a heavy R&B and neo-soul flavor, with a dash of topical antiwar sentiment.

    Ms. Blige led with eight nominations, but her album “The Breakthrough” did not receive a nod for album of the year. Ms. Blige, who has previously won three Grammys, has made the demand for respect a recurring songwriting motif. She emerged more than a decade ago with a style that departed from the slick R&B in vogue at the time, making her survival of a rough childhood and abusive relationships an integral part of her songs. But her nominated song in the record of the year category, “Be Without You,” testifies to a resilient relationship and perhaps a more hopeful state of affairs.

    The Dixie Chicks captured song of the year and best country performance by a duo or group with vocal for “Not Ready to Make Nice.” The country category offered up at least one more surprising twist, as the rock gods of New Jersey, Bon Jovi, won best country collaboration with vocals for “Who Says You Can’t Go Home” with Jennifer Nettles. On a more anticipated note, Carrie Underwood, an “American Idol” contestant turned commercial superstar, won for female country vocal performance with “Jesus, Take the Wheel.”

    The most politically charged band of the moment, the Dixie Chicks, received five nominations for their album “Taking the Long Road” (Columbia), including nods in the marquee categories of album, record and song of the year. Victory at the Grammys provides a measure of vindication. The band has been shunned by mainstream country radio since its lead singer, Natalie Maines, made an off-the-cuff remark to London concertgoers back in 2003. Boycotts and death threats followed Ms. Maines’s comment about the war in Iraq: “Just so you know, we’re ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas.”

    But the band is unapologetic about what happened, as made clear by the chorus to its hit song “Not Ready to Make Nice”: “I’m not ready to make nice/I’m not ready to back down/I’m still mad as hell/And I don’t have time/To go round and round and round.”

    Despite little support from country radio and disappointing concert sales, the album has sold more than 1.9 million copies. Capturing album of the year, however, was an uphill struggle. Only two country albums — Glen Campbell’s “By the Time I Get to Phoenix” and the soundtrack to “O Brother, Where Art Thou?” — have triumphed in that category.

    Continuing a Grammy tradition, the polkameister Jimmy Sturr and his orchestra won for best polka album, “Polka in Paradise” (Rounder). It was their 16th Grammy. And the former president Jimmy Carter, whose recent book, “Palestine(no colon) Peace Not Apartheid,” has encountered a storm of opposition, won for a less contentious but as pointed production. His “Our Endangered Values: America’s Moral Crisis” (Simon & Schuster Audio) tied in the best spoken word category with Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee‘s “With Ossie and Ruby: In This Life Together (Time Warner).

    Amid the melodramatic neo-soul of James Blunt (five nominations), there is also some pointed antiwar commentary in the work of other nominees. The title of Neil Young‘s nominees for best rock album, “Living With War,” and best rock solo vocal performance, “Lookin’ for a Leader,” make that clear. And John Mayer’s “Waiting on the World to Change” comes at the war in a more oblique manner.

    The Grammys would not be complete without a little controversy. Mr. Dylan, whose “Modern Times” garnered impressive reviews (Blender compared him to Yeats and Matisse), received no nominations in any of the most prestigious categories. Rascal Flatts’ album, though one of the best-selling of the year, was snubbed in the country album category. And Timbaland, who guided much of Mr. Timberlake’s “FutureSex/Love Sounds” and produced “Promiscuous” for Nelly Furtado, was shut out.

    Another of the year’s biggest musical influences, the hirsute producer Rick Rubin, did win the Grammy for producer of the year, but given his aversion to these sorts of record industry social gatherings was expected to stay clear of Staples Center. Mr. Rubin, who produced nominated albums for the Red Hot Chili Peppers and Dixie Chicks, as well as tracks for Mr. Timberlake’s album, has been less nimble at avoiding another uncomfortable situation: he has been at the center of a tug-of-war between two record companies. Sony BMG Music has recruited him to become co-chairman of its Columbia Records label, but his boutique label, American Recordings, is still under contract to a rival, the Warner Music Group’s Warner Brothers label.

    Last year’s ceremony, held on a Wednesday, bumped up against the juggernaut that is “American Idol,” and the Grammys paid the price in the ratings. Slightly more than 17 million people tuned in to the telecast, down 10 percent from the 18.8 million who watched in 2005 and the lowest tally since 1995, according to Nielsen Media Research.

    In this digital-cable universe of hundreds of channels, few awards shows attract the hoopla and ratings they used to. But the Grammys have fallen more than most. They once hit a high of 51.6 million (in 1984), but even in the past decade they have reliably drawn audiences in the mid-20-million range.

    Executives of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, best known as the Recording Academy, were hoping that a little bit of the old razzle-dazzle would reverse this trend. Besides the Police, who are likely to announce a national tour on Monday, Earth, Wind & Fire, whose funkadelic sound reached its heights in the 1970s, were to join Ms. Blige and Ludacris for a performance of “Runaway Love.” And the Recording Academy even tried to co-opt a little of the “American Idol” magic by holding a “My Grammy Moment” contest for one lucky unsigned artist to perform with Justin Timberlake during the show. Fans voted online at Yahoo Music, winnowing the finalists from 12 to 5 to 3. They are Africa Miranda, 30, of Montgomery, Ala.; Brenda Radney, 22, of Staten Island; and Robyn Troup, 18, of Houston. The winner will be announced live on the show.

    But even if the casting stunts goose the ratings, the larger travails of the music business will still loom over any good vibes emanating from the festivities. Even a doubling of sales of digital albums failed to make up for the continued downward trek of CD sales. Album sales last year dropped almost 5 percent, to 588 million, following a 7 percent drop the year before, according to Nielsen SoundScan. One worrisome trend was the decline in sales of hip-hop albums, which had been among the stronger performers in recent years. (Hip-hop acts also received little love from the Recording Academy; no rap album received a nomination in any of the major categories.)

    The best-selling album of 2006 was the soundtrack to the Disney Channel movie “High School Musical,” which sold 3.7 million copies. And Daniel Powter’s song “Bad Day” was the best-selling digital song, selling more than 2 million copies thanks in large part to its prime positioning on “American Idol.” Neither recording received a Grammy nomination.

    To be eligible for an award, a recording had to have been released between Oct 1, 2005, and Sept. 30, 2006. The winners were selected by the academy’s more than 11,000 voting members, who are recording industry professionals with creative or technical credits on at least six albums or songs.

    This article was reported by Jeff Leeds in Los Angeles and Lorne Manly in New York.


    SPIEGEL ONLINE – February 9, 2007, 07:12 PM
    URL: http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,464685,00.html

    ABU DHABI MUSEUM PROJECT

    A Desert Louvre?

    By Heiko Klaas and Nicole Büsing

    Everyone’s heard of the Louvre and the MOMA, but not everyone knows Abu Dhabi is aspiring to become one of the world’s new culture capitals. Star architects have been commissioned to build the world’s most spectacular museums on an island just off the Arab metropolis.

    In 1791, two events occured that don’t seem to have much to do with one another — at least at first sight. The Bani Yas, a Bedouin tribe, discovered a freshwater spring by the Persian Gulf and founded a small settlement that eventually became the emirate of Abu Dhabi. Several thousand kilometers away, in Paris, the constituent assembly of post-revolutionary France issued a decree nationalizing the royal art collection and announced the opening of a public museum in the Louvre. Now, 216 years later, the Louvre and Abu Dhabi suddenly have a lot in common.

    .. Vignette StoryServer 5.0 Fri Feb 09 19:26:29 2007 –>.. Asset gallery: TemplateEngine –>

    Photo Gallery: Art in the Desert

    Click on a picture to launch the image gallery (9 Photos)

    “Abu Dhabi Is to Gain a Louvre of Its Own,” the New York Times announced last month. Abu Dhabi’s royal family plans to buy a $650 million (€500 million) share of the Louvre. This will allow them to transfer several hundred artworks to the Arab metropolis for an initial term of 20 years. The art is to be exhibited in a planned new museum.

    The news caused a wave of indignation in France. The “Desert Louvre” isn’t particularly popular in the grande nation. Critics even fear the country’s national legacy may be sold off. But it seems negotiations are still ongoing. Rumor has it the French are now demanding at least $1 billion.

    “A cultural asset for the world”

    Whether it will be called the “Louvre Abu Dhabi” or something similarly intriguing, what will be built in the desert is far more than just a museum for classical art. Abu Dhabi’s national Tourism Development & Investment Company (TDIC) promises “a cultural asset for the world” and a “beacon for cultural experience and exchange,” in the words of Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the president of the United Arab Emirates and ruler of Abu Dhabi. The first tourist attractions will be available for viewing in 2012, and the entire project is scheduled for completion in 2018.

    Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan has commissioned no less than four of the world’s most famous architects to create what promises to become one of the world’s most important cultural destinations: Frank O. Gehry, Jean Nouvel, Tadao Ando and Zaha Hadid.

    Just off Abu Dhabi lies Saadiyat Island — the name means “Island of Happiness” in Arabic — a 27 square kilometer (10.4 square mile) piece of land where Frank O. Gehry, who was born in 1929, is to build another Guggenheim Museum. Gehry’s sensational plans for a new Guggenheim on the southern tip of Manhattan were put on ice indefinitely after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. But there’s justice: Now the computer-generated, abstract shapes of his architectural imagination have made it all the way to the Persian Gulf.

    New possibilities

    With its spectacular architecture of compressed and intricately interconnected cuboids, prisms, cones and cylinders, and with a total area of almost 30,000 square meters (323,000 square feet), the Abu Dhabi Guggenheim will probably far outshine its New York City predecessor. Gehry is satisfied: “Approaching the design of the museum for Abu Dhabi made it possible to consider options for design of a building that would not be possible in the United States or in Europe,” he says, adding that, “It was clear from the beginning that this had to be a new invention.”

    Fifty-seven-year-old Iraqi architect Zaha Hadid, who lives in London, also has bombastic plans. Her Performing Arts Center, a building complex 62 meters (203 feet) tall, will include two concert halls, an opera and two theaters. The total number of seats will be 6,300 — about as many as the Lincoln Center in New York has. Like the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi, the theater complex will also offer spectacular views of the Persian Gulf and the skyline of the city.

    Hadid is living up to her reputation as the high priestess of deconstruction in architecture. You’ll search in vain for a right angle anywhere in her model. Like the bow of a ship, the four-storey construction rises dynamically towards the sea. A network of fluidly shaped windows covers an amoeba-like structure. The auditoriums are completely white. The finespun, branchlike structure is reminiscent of the interior of a bone.

    Microcity with big ideas

    Frenchman Jean Nouvel, who was born in 1945, has adapted his metaphorically charged architectural model for the “desert Louvre” to the topographical conditions of the location — the immediate proximity of desert and sea. He’s not planning to build a single gargantuan building, but rather a “microcity” — a cluster-like collection of differently sized building types directly by the sea. The ensemble will be dominated by a great, light-flooded dome, conceived of as a symbolic link between world cultures.

    The dome is “made of a web of different patterns interlaced into a translucent ceiling which lets a diffuse, magical light come through in the best tradition of great Arabian architecture,” Nouvel says. That he, of all people, was commissioned to design this building was kept secret until the last moment. Nouvel already crafted an architectural bond between the East and the West 20 years ago, in the form of the Institut du Monde Arabe (1981-1987) in Paris.

    Tadao Ando’s Maritime Museum promises to be another highlight. Born in 1941, the minimalist architect is known for his austere style, which combines the Japanese Zen tradition with the modernist penchant for bare concrete. Inspired by dhows, the traditional sailing vessels of Arab merchants, Ando has designed a fragile-looking building in the shape of an abstract sail curved by the wind. Embedded in an oasis-like natural scenario dominated by a subterranean aquarium, Ando’s restrained architecture promises to become a popular haven of contemplative peace within the planned architectural overkill.

    The Biennale Park — inspired by Venice

    The so-called Biennale Park, another development project planned for Saadiyat Island, openly acknowledges its Venetian inspiration with 19 pavilions designed by 19 younger architects. Hani Rashid is one of them. He’s an Egyptian architect who lives in New York and is considered one of the most important contemporary architectural theorists. The park will be criss-crossed by a 1.5 kilometer (0.9 mile) navigable canal. As the country with the highest per capita income in the world, the United Arab Emirates certainly have no inhibitions about competing with the traditional cultural capitals of the world.

    .. Vignette StoryServer 5.0 Thu Jan 04 09:10:52 2007 –>
    Of course, all these cultural highlights also require a tourist infrastructure that can cope with the masses of people expected to arrive from all over the world. Two 10-lane highways will connect Saadayat Island to the city and the airport. The completion of 29 hotels — including a seven-star luxury hotel that is presumably Abu Dhabi’s reply to to the legendary Burj Al Arab in Dubai — is planned for 2018. There will also be a marina for cruise ships and moneyed yacht-owners, expected to provide mooring for about 1,000 vessels.

    Saadayat Island promises to far outdo Las Vegas and Bilbao — the traditional red rags for cultural pessimists and critics of tourism — in terms of its capacity to provoke. And yet many culture fans may end up in Abu Dhabi sooner or later — whether to admire the city or just to rant.

     
     

    Las Vegas police shoot officer recruit in gunbattle


    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    LAS VEGAS (AP) – A Las Vegas police recruit was gunned down and killed in a shootout with police officers Friday night after witnesses saw him throwing Mototov cocktails into the street and firing his handgun into the air.

    The recruit, described by witnesses as a heavyset man possibly in his early 30s, was seen randomly firing and throwing the incendiary devices around 8:45 p.m. near an apartment complex about a block east of the Las Vegas Strip.

    When Las Vegas police arrived, the recruit began firing at them, and a gunfight erupted.

    Officers shot the recruit multiple times, and he later died at University Medical Center, police said Saturday. Police did not identify him.

    Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie, who on Friday night was at the scene of the shooting, across Las Vegas Boulevard from Mandalay Bay, said the recruit had been in the academy since Jan. 30.

    A motive for the rampage wasn’t known, but police were investigating.

    “It’s a difficult situation out here just because an officer-involved shooting itself is very traumatic,” Gillespie said. “And when they find out after the fact that it’s somebody that’s currently in our academy, I’m sure it adds more to the emotional side of what took place.”

    The sheriff couldn’t recall in his 26 years with the department a shootout between police and a recruit or fellow officer.

    The Clark County Fire Department arrived to put out brush fires ignited by the Molotov cocktails but retreated after the recruit pointed a handgun at them, authorities said.

    “He came loaded for bear, it seems,” said Scott Allison, spokesman for the Clark County Fire Department. “Our firefighters don’t usually have guns pointed at them.”

    Apartment resident Frank Cardone saw part of the gunbattle from his second-story balcony.

    “I thought it was a game,” said Cardone, 87, a retired police officer from North Bergen, N.J.

    Cardone said he realized it was for real when at least a dozen police officers converged on the property.

    “I said, ‘Who the hell is watching the city?’ There were 50 million police cars out here,” he said.

    Police found two handguns in the recruit’s possession, Gillespie said.

    The incident marked the second officer-involved shooting of 2007 in the Las Vegas area.

    Information from: Las Vegas Review-Journal, http://www.lvrj.com

    Today’s Papers


    Putin Provokes
    By Roger McShane
    Posted Sunday, Feb. 11, 2007, at 6:06 AM E.T.

    The Los Angeles Times and Washington Post lead with, while the New York Times fronts, Vladimir Putin’s harsh criticism of American foreign policy at an international security conference in Munich. Speaking in front of dozens of American and European officials, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Putin said the U.S. “has overstepped its national borders in every way,” causing global instability and setting off a nuclear arms race. According to the LAT, which has the best coverage, “one German questioner jokingly told Putin he hoped the president had not set off ‘another world war.’”

    The WP describes the tone of the speech as “more a considered lecture than a Khrushchevian dais-thumper.” Nevertheless, in 32 minutes Putin reeled off a laundry list of complaints that touched on America’s “hyper-use of military force”, the West’s support of reform movements in eastern Europe, American work on antimissile systems, NATO expansion, and Russian access to Western markets. An American congressional delegation that included John McCain and Joe Lieberman sat stone-faced in the audience.

    The papers do a good job of describing the scene in Munich, but the analysis is pretty thin. The WP says Putin’s remarks “seemingly were not prompted by any particular provocation” and the LAT quotes analysts saying they “appeared timed to take advantage of the Bush administration’s weakness.” Only brief mention is given to how Russia’s energy resources have allowed Putin to adopt a more assertive foreign policy, and how many Russians are fed up with criticism from the West.

    In its lead story, the NYT shows how members of Congress have already found a way around pesky new ethics rules, passed just a month ago. It’s now illegal for lobbyists to pay directly for lawmakers’ lavish vacations and expensive dinners. But they can still donate money to members’ political action committees, which, in turn, can pay for these outings as fundraising events. The NYT compiles a nifty little list of PAC fundraising events that would make Jack Abramoff jealous (though Rep. Eric Cantor really needs to get more creative).

    In another political fundraising story, the WP says John McCain is embracing “some of the same political-money figures, forces and tactics” that he has made a career railing against. There seems to be an effort here to paint McCain as a hypocrite and his presidential campaign and reform efforts as mutually exclusive. But even his campaign finance reform allies understand the bind he is in. “It is apparent to us that to run a competitive presidential campaign inside a system that is still broken, that is what he has to do,” said Mary Boyle of Common Cause. Unfortunately, that quote appears in the last sentence of the story.

    In other campaign news, Barack Obama shows us why presidential candidates form exploratory committees first—two days of headlines for the price of one. The NYT and WP both front (with photo) the formal announcement by Obama that he will be running for president. Speaking in frigid weather at the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois, where Abraham Lincoln delivered his famous “House Divided” speech, Obama laid out “an ambitious agenda that includes bringing an end to the Iraq war, eliminating poverty, ensuring universal health care and creating energy independence.” Yet he again emphasized that his leadership ability was more important than specific ideas. In a sober assessment, the NYT says “it seems evident that Mr. Obama’s easier days as a candidate have passed. Unlike Mrs. Clinton, or to a lesser extent Mr. Edwards, Mr. Obama has not gone through a full-scale audit.”

    Elsewhere in the world, the LAT reports that Iran’s reformists believe they are being undercut by the Bush administration’s saber rattling, which only helps to prop up the faltering president. The administration may or may not agree with that assessment, but it has distributed new talking points that play down any suggestion of war planning, according to the WP. This comes amid signs that multilateral pressure on Iran might be working. That pressure got a bit more multilateral yesterday, when Vladimir Putin criticized Iran for not answering questions posed by the I.A.E.A. about its nuclear program.

    On the other axis of evil front, talks with North Korea have been extended after negotiators failed to reach an agreement over the energy aid North Korea would receive as compensation for closing its main nuclear reactor.

    The NYT‘s “Week in Review” section is chock-full of good stuff this Sunday, including a rundown of who’s blaming who for the problems in Iraq. Also worth a look are Dick Cheney’s notes from 1975 as he considered how the Ford White House should handle an article by Seymour Hersh about a secret espionage program. The Times says the notes show Cheney “is hostile to the press and to Congress, insistent on the prerogatives of the executive branch and adamant about the importance of national security secrets.” It seems not much has changed.

    Roger McShane writes for the Economist online.

     
    Sex

    Thursday, 8 February 2007
    Lust in Space: Are Astronauts Doing It?
    Topic: sex

    107919spaceshuttleblastoffposters If you’re like me — and God help you if you are — you’ve been obsessively following the astronaut love- triangle scandal. And you’ve been asking yourself: If two astronauts were obsessed with each other on earth, could they get it on up there in space? Especially if they had a thing about diapers?

    Slate magazine wondered the same thing. (Boy, do I like the way they think). Here’s what they discovered:

    If astronauts have had space sex, it would have been very difficult. First off, there isn’t much privacy up there. A regular shuttle is about as big as a 737, and the two main areas—the crew cabin and middeck—are each the size of a small office…The space station, on the other hand, has a little more room to operate.

    But if there was booty, would it be any good?

    Recent research suggests it would not. For one thing, zero gravity can induce nausea—a less-than-promising sign for would-be lovers. Astronauts also perspire a lot in flight, meaning sex without gravity would likely be hot, wet, and surrounded by small droplets of sweat. In addition, people normally experience lower blood pressure in space, which means reduced blood flow, which means … well, you know what that means.

    Viagra, right? Well, maybe not. Viagra can cause low blood pressure, not a good thing when you already have it; you might faint during a moment when you’d rather be conscious. (That’s why people aren’t supposed to use Viagra with nitrate medications or poppers: the two can combine to really lower blood pressure.)

    Readers, are there any drugs (legal ones, please) that astronauts could sneak into space to make sure their sexual response doesn’t fall to earth? And that business about little droplets of sweat floating in the air — would that apply to other fluids too?

    Do Astronauts Have Sex?
    [Slate]







    Posted by Randy Dotinga 1:23 AM | Post Comment | View Comments (5) | Permalink
    Do Astronauts Have Sex?
    In space, no one can hear you moan.
    By Christopher Beam
    Posted Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2007, at 7:19 PM E.T.
    Astronaut Lisa Nowak is facing attempted murder charges after she drove nearly 1,000 miles to confront a rival for the affections of another astronaut, Bill Oefelein. Nowak said that she and Oefelein had “more than a working relationship, but less than a romantic relationship.” Wait, did they ever get it on in space?

    No. Nowak and Oefelein were never on the same mission, so they couldn’t possibly have joined the 62-mile-high club. But some of their colleagues may well have engaged in some extraterrestrial hanky-panky. Former and current astronauts don’t like to talk about space-shuttle sex, and NASA says that if it’s ever happened, the agency doesn’t know anything about it. (NASA has never conducted official experiments on animal reproduction in space, says a spokesman.)

    If astronauts have had space sex, it would have been very difficult. First off, there isn’t much privacy up there. A regular shuttle is about as big as a 737, and the two main areas—the crew cabin and middeck—are each the size of a small office. The bathroom is little more than a seat with a curtain, and there aren’t any closed rooms where two people could retreat. The space station, on the other hand, has a little more room to operate. The three-person crew generally splits up for sleeping time: Two of them bed down in a pair of tiny crew cabins at one end of the station, and the third might jump in a sleeping bag at the other end, almost 200 feet away. (The panel-and-strap design of a space bed might not be that conducive to lovemaking.) Astronauts also have a demanding work schedule, leaving them with little time or energy for messing around. Space-station crews do get time off on weekends, though, when they can watch movies, read books, play games, “and generally have a good time.”

    Of course, speculation has been rampant. The first mission that included both men and women launched in 1982. But on that flight, cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya’s reputation for toughness, not to mention her married status, stamped out rumors. The first married couple went to space in 1991, when training-camp sweethearts Jan Davis and Mark Lee served together on a mission. NASA normally has a policy against letting married couples fly together, not because they’re afraid they’ll have sex, but because it might hurt the team dynamic. However, they made an exception for Davis and Lee since the couple got married so close to launch time. (In this photo, taken during the mission, Lee has his arm around Davis.) Both have refused to answer questions about the nature of their relationship during the mission. In the 1990s, rumors circulated about unorthodox coziness between Elena Kondakova and Valery Polyakov on a mission to the space station Mir, especially after a video got out showing Valery playfully splashing water on Elena during the flight.

    The question of space sex has prompted at least one hoax. In his book The Last Mission, French author Pierre Kohler claimed that NASA had commissioned a study on sexual positions in outer space. He cited a fictional document, widely available online, that describes subjects experimenting with 10 different positions, six of which required an elastic band or sleeping-baglike tube to keep the couple together in zero gravity.

    Which raises the question: Would space sex be any good? Recent research suggests it would not. For one thing, zero gravity can induce nausea—a less-than-promising sign for would-be lovers. Astronauts also perspire a lot in flight, meaning sex without gravity would likely be hot, wet, and surrounded by small droplets of sweat. In addition, people normally experience lower blood pressure in space, which means reduced blood flow, which means … well, you know what that means.

    Got a question about today’s news? Ask the Explainer.

    The Explainer thanks Bob Jacobs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Laura Woodmansee, author of Sex in Space.


Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *