April 13, 2006
















  • Preventable Disease Blinds Poor in Third World










    Mariella Furrer/Think, for The New York Times

    After undergoing surgery for trachiasis on both her eyes, Mare Aleghan, 42yrs old, sits in a house in Forgera, Ethiopia, where she and her daughter were accommodated for free by a stranger.

    March 31, 2006
    On the Brink | Trachoma
    Preventable Disease Blinds Poor in Third World
    By CELIA W. DUGGER

    ALEMBER, Ethiopia Mare Alehegn lay back nervously on the metal operating table, her heart visibly pounding beneath her sackcloth dress, and clenched her fists as the paramedic sliced into her eyelid. Repeated infections had scarred the undersides of her eyelids, causing them to contract and forcing her lashes in on her eyes. For years, each blink felt like thorns raking her eyeballs. She had plucked the hairs with crude tweezers, but the stubble grew back sharper still.

    The scratching, for Mrs. Alehegn, 42, and millions worldwide, gradually clouds the eyeball, dimming vision and, if left untreated, eventually leads to a life shrouded in darkness. This is late-stage trachoma, a neglected disease of neglected people, and a preventable one, but for a lack of the modest resources that could defeat it.

    This operation, which promised to lift the lashes off Mrs. Alehegn’s lacerated eyes, is a 15-minute procedure so simple that a health worker with a few weeks of training can do it. The materials cost about $10.

    The operation, performed last year, would not only deliver Mrs. Alehegn from disabling pain and stop the damage to her corneas, but it also would hold out hope of a new life for her daughter, Enatnesh, who waited vigilantly outside the operating room door at the free surgery camp here.

    Mrs. Alehegn’s husband left her years ago when the disease rendered her unable to do a wife’s work. At 6, Enatnesh was forced to choose between a father who could support her, or a lifetime of hard labor to help a mother who had no one else to turn to.

    “I chose my mother,” said the frail, pigtailed slip of a girl, so ill fed that she looked closer to 10 than her current age, 16. “If I hadn’t gone with her, she would have died. No one was there to even give her a glass of water.”

    Their tale is common among trachoma sufferers. Trachoma’s blinding damage builds over decades of repeated infections that begin in babies. The infections are spread from person to person, or by hungry flies that feed from seeping eyes.

    In large part because women look after the children, and children are the most heavily infected, women are three times more likely to get the blinding, late stage of the disease.

    For many women, the pain and eventual blindness ensure a life of deepening destitution and dependency. They become a burden on daughters and granddaughters, making trachoma a generational scourge among women and girls who are often already the most vulnerable of the poor.

    Trachoma disappeared from the United States and Europe as living standards improved, but remains endemic in much of Africa and parts of Latin America and Asia, its last, stubborn redoubts. The World Health Organization estimates that 70 million people are infected with it. Five million suffer from its late stages. And two million are blind because of it.

    A million people like Mrs. Alehegn need the eyelid surgery in Ethiopia alone. Yet last year only 60,000 got it, all paid for by nonprofit groups like the Carter Center, Orbis and Christian Blind Mission International.

    As prevalent as trachoma remains, the W.H.O. has made the blinding late stage of the disease a target for eradication within a generation because, in theory at least, everything needed to vanquish it is available. Controlling trachoma depends on relatively simple advances in hygiene, antibiotics and the inexpensive operation that was performed on Mrs. Alehegn.

    But the extent of the disease far exceeds the money and medical workers available. In poor countries like this one, faced with epidemics of AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis, a disease like trachoma, which disables and blinds, has difficulty competing with those big killers.

    Dr. Abebe Eshetu, a health official here in Ethiopia’s Amhara region, described the resources available for trachoma as “a cup of water in the ocean.”

    Nowhere is the need greater than across this harsh rural landscape.

    As dawn broke one day last year, hundreds of people desperate for relief streamed into an eyelid surgery camp run by the government and paid for by the Carter Center. Some of the oldest had walked days on feet twisted by arthritis to get here.

    The throng spread across the scrubby land around a small health clinic. They wrapped shawls around their heads to shield themselves from sun and dust, made all the more agonizing by their affliction. Their cheeks were etched with the salty tracks of tears.

    ‘Hair in the Eye’

    Typical of those was Mrs. Alehegn, led stumbling and barefoot through stony fields by Enatnesh, who worriedly shielded her mother under a faded black umbrella.

    As they waited their turn, Mrs. Alehegn explained that her troubles began more than 15 years ago when she developed “hair in the eye,” as trachoma is known here. The pain made it impossible for her to cook over smoky dung fires, hike to distant wells for water or work in dusty fields, the essential duties of a wife.

    Gradually the affliction soured her relationship with her husband, Asmare Demissie, who divorced her a decade ago, so he could marry a healthy woman.

    “When I stopped getting up in the morning to do the housecleaning, when I stopped helping with the farm work, we started fighting,” Mrs. Alehegn said.

    The operation she had come for is still exceedingly rare in Ethiopia. Only 76 ophthalmologists practice in this vast nation of 70 million people. Most work in the capital, Addis Ababa, not in the rural areas where trachoma reigns.

    Because of the extreme doctor shortage, nonprofit groups have paid for the training of ordinary government health workers over two to four weeks to do the eyelid surgery. The Carter Center, which favors a month of training, estimates the cost at $600 per worker, plus $800 for two surgical instrument kits for each of them.

    Those trained make an incision that runs the length of the eyelid’s underside, through the cartilagelike plate, then lift the side of the lid fringed with the eyelashes outward. Then they stitch the two sides back together. The patient is given a local anesthetic.

    The operation cannot undo the damage already done to corneas, which makes the abraded eyes vulnerable to infections. But it can stop further injury. And because the disease often takes decades to render its victims blind, the operation can save a woman’s sight and halt disabling pain.

    For Mrs. Alehegn, the surgery was her second. Her plight is typical, for trachoma is both a disease of poverty and a disease that causes poverty.

    After separating from her husband, she, Enatnesh and another daughter, Adelogne, then just 4, moved to a small, poor piece of land belonging to Mrs. Alehegn’s family. About a year later, Mrs. Alehegn scraped together enough money for her first eyelid surgery. But as she aged, the underside of her eyelids scarred by past trachoma infections continued to shrink, turning her lashes inward again.

    In recent years, her poverty was so dire she could not afford to have the surgery again. Her only income was the dollar or so a week that Enatnesh collected when she went to market to sell the cotton fabric her mother wove. They were so poor they could not afford even 15 cents for soap.

    “If I get my health back, it means everything,” Mrs. Alehegn said. “I’ll be able to work and support my family.”

    The others who journeyed to the camp told many such stories of hardship. In a land where early death is commonplace, some of those with the disease see their wounded eyes, ceaselessly leaking tears, as a kind of stigmata of sorrow.

    Banchiayehu Gonete, an elderly widow, said three of her eight children had died young. The bitterest loss was of her eldest daughter, carried off by malaria at 40 with a baby still inside her. It was this daughter who had plucked her in-turned lashes, cooked for her and kept her company.

    “God killed my children,” said Mrs. Gonete, old and wrinkled, but unsure of her age. “I feel this pain as part of my mourning.”

    Nearby, Tsehainesh Beryihun, 10, sat with her grandmother, Yamrot Mekonen. Trachoma ended the girl’s childhood years ago.

    When her parents divorced, her mother gave Tsehainesh, then just a baby, to her paternal grandmother. As the old woman’s sight failed, Tsehainesh became her servant. Since she was 7, she has fetched water, cooked, cleaned, collected dung and wood for the fire and swept the dirt floors, her grandmother said.

    The girl sees her half brothers and sisters, the children of her father’s second marriage, happily dashing to school, while she lives apart, her days filled with the grinding work of tending to a sickly, demanding old woman.

    Her grandmother explained that the girl owes her. “I’ve supported her this far,” Mrs. Mekonen said impassively, “so now it’s her turn to support me.”

    Tsehainesh wept bitterly as her grandmother spoke, refusing to utter a word.

    Ending Disability and Dependency

    To break this cycle of debilitation and dependency, the goal is not eradication of the eye infections themselves, which most agree is neither practical nor necessary, but rather to reduce their frequency and intensity, a more achievable goal. This would avoid development of the devastating late stage of trachoma, called trichiasis, that makes surgery the sufferers’ only salvation.

    Toward that end, the World Health Organization has approved a strategy known as SAFE, an acronym that stands for surgery, antibiotics, face washing and environmental change, notably improved access to latrines and water.

    Already, some researchers say, the growing use of antibiotics around the world to treat infections, even those unrelated to trachoma, has probably contributed to trachoma’s decline. That is true even in very poor countries where there is no organized effort to tackle the disease, like Nepal and Malawi, they say.

    The use of Zithromax, an antibiotic manufactured by Pfizer, has proved a breakthrough. The most common alternative is a cheap, messy antibiotic ointment that has to be applied twice daily to the eyes for six weeks. Zithromax, in contrast, can be taken in a single dose making compliance easier and distribution to millions simpler.

    By 2008, Pfizer, the world’s largest drug maker, will have donated 145 million doses for trachoma control. Its contribution is administered by the International Trachoma Initiative, a nonprofit group. The drug has been provided in 11 of the 55 countries where trachoma remains a problem.

    But globally, the World Health Organization estimates that at least 350 million people need the antibiotics once a year for three years to bring infection rates under control.

    That equals more than a billion doses of azithromycin, the generic name for Zithromax. Trachoma is so rampant here in Ethiopia that an estimated 60 million people, or 86 percent of the country’s population, need the drug.

    Pfizer has not officially announced any additional donations, but Dr. Joseph M. Feczko, a Pfizer vice president, says the company will provide whatever is needed. “There’s no cap or limit on this,” he said. “We’re in it for the long haul.”

    But even free drugs cost money to distribute. No global estimates are available for carrying out the SAFE strategy for trachoma control, but the Ethiopian government, beset by competing social problems, would have to come up with $30 million to reach even half the people who need the antibiotic, and $20 million more for public education on basic hygiene.

    For now, the aim here is a more modest effort at localized control, but even that will not be easy.

    An Ancient Scourge

    Chlamydia trachomatis, the microorganism that causes trachoma, has been a source of misery for millennia, thriving in poor, crowded and unsanitary conditions. In ancient Egypt, in-turned eyelashes were plucked, then treated with a mixture of frankincense, lizard dung and donkey blood. In Victorian England, infected children were isolated in separate schools.

    At the turn of the century, doctors at Ellis Island used a buttonhook to examine the undersides of immigrants’ eyelids. Those with signs of trachoma were often shipped back to their home countries.

    Swarming Musca sorbens flies play an ignominious role in spreading the disease. They crave eye discharge and pick up chlamydia as they burrow greedily, maddeningly into infected eyes.

    “They cluster shoulder to shoulder around an infected eye,” said Paul Emerson, the entomologist who did pioneering work on the role of the flies in spreading trachoma and who now runs the Carter Center’s trachoma control program.

    So inescapable, so persistent are they here in the Amhara region that children learn not to bother shooing them away. Even at the surgery camp, flies buzzed through the chicken wire that covered the windows of cramped operating rooms, harassing trachoma victims at the moment they sought relief.

    Once the eggs of a female fly are ripe, she lays them in her preferred breeding medium, human feces, plentiful because most people here go to the bathroom outdoors.

    But the flies cannot breed in simple, inexpensive pit latrines, Mr. Emerson said. He said he does not yet know why, but he thinks that a competing species that does thrive in latrines may eat the Musca sorbens maggots.

    Ethiopia is now making a national effort to get people to build latrines, training thousands of village health workers to spread the word. It is also teaching children the importance of face washing in school.

    But soap and water are scarce, too. Women often walk hours a day to wells to carry home precious pots of water balanced on their heads. And soap is a luxury for the poorest of the poor.

    For those like Mrs. Alehegn, with late stage trachoma, surgery will continue to be necessary.

    When her operation was complete, the health worker who performed it, Mola Dessie, pressed white cotton pads on Mrs. Alehegn’s eyes to soak up the blood and applied antibiotic ointment to prevent infection. Then he covered her eyes with bandages.

    Enatnesh wrapped her mother’s head in a dingy cloth and slipped her stick-thin arm around her mother’s waist to lead her away.

    Mrs. Alehegn, who is illiterate, says she hopes that once she heals she will be able to weave more cloth, earn more money and do the domestic chores, leaving Enatnesh freer to pursue an education. “I don’t want her to live my life,” she said.

    Despite her dependence on her daughter, Mrs. Alehegn has allowed the girl to go to school. Enatnesh, though having fallen behind, is a diligent fifth grader at age 16, who proudly said she is ranked 5th out of 74 students in her class. She dreams of being a doctor.

    Two days after her mother’s surgery, Enatnesh led the way to her father’s sturdily built hut a couple of hours walk away. There, as his second wife swept the compound and Enatnesh’s 9-year-old half-brother sat in the shade, Mr. Demissie, 58, offered a regretful explanation for his decision to divorce his first wife.

    He, too, had developed “hair in the eye,” he said. And like his wife, he, too, had been forced to stop working. If they had not separated, he reckoned, they would both have died. Finally, Mr. Demissie decided to save himself.

    His sick wife would never find anyone else to marry, he realized. But for him, a new, hardworking wife would provide a second chance. And after his marriage, he got the surgery to prevent his own blindness.

    “If we had not been sick,” he said sadly, “we would have raised our children together.”

    As he spoke, Enatnesh listened sorrowfully, her hand cupped over her mouth, her head bent low.

    Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company


     







    Questions for George Saunders










    Hal Silverman for The New York Times

    April 9, 2006
    Questions for George Saunders
    The Stuff of Fiction
    Interview by DEBORAH SOLOMON
    Q: Your new collection of short stories, “In Persuasion Nation,” presents America as a commerce-saturated but happy place where children go to live with market-research firms and giant Twinkies run through fields of flowers. Is it fair to call you an ecstatic appreciator of trash culture?

    Excuse me. Can we require readers to read my books before they continue with this interview?

    No, I am afraid not. What are you hoping they might gain?

    When you read a short story, you come out a little more aware and a little more in love with the world around you. What I want is to have the reader come out just 6 percent more awake to the world.

    But more awake to what, exactly? To talking Dorito chips, which play a part in the title story in your new collection?

    Everything in the world is holy and unholy at the same time. If we didn’t have that part of us that craved Doritos, then they wouldn’t exist. I’m actually working on a story now that is all product names. There’s not even a verb.

    But some product names double as verbs. Like Bounce. Or Shout, the stain remover.

    Or Pampers. What about Swiffers? That sounds like a verb.

    What are Swiffers?

    You get this handle and there’s this box of citrus-scented wet towels that you put on there. How is that for an articulate description? It’s this thing that you put on the end of a thing!

    Although you’re often described as a dark satirist of American culture, your work is essentially a nostalgia fest. Like Pop Art, it drips with sentiment about things it pretends to ridicule.

    When I was a kid, I took “The Brady Bunch” and “The Partridge Family” very seriously. It was a world to me in the same way that the Greek myths would have been had I read them. You know, Marcia is Athena and Mr. Brady is Zeus.

    It’s true that “The Brady Bunch” creates its own imaginative universe, somewhat like fiction or any art form. You cannot say that about today’s reality shows.

    I agree, “The Brady Bunch” can seem utopian compared to “American Idol” or “The Bachelor” or “Swapping Grandma” or “America’s Bravest Hottie Midgets.”

    What is the connection between television and the arc of our lives?

    I don’t think it is a coincidence that we got into Iraq in the wake of Monica Lewinsky and O. J. and the round-the-clock television coverage of them. There has got to be a causal connection between the kind of small-bite thinking that we started to accept around the time of Monica and our incredible gullibility vis–vis Iraq.

    Can you tell us about your background as a former engineer from Chicago?

    When I was younger, I had this idea that I would write the big novel and get the big score. Instead, I went to this college called the Colorado School of Mines, and the best thing that ever happened to me is that nothing happened in writing. I ended up working for engineering companies, and that’s where I found my material, in the everyday struggle between capitalism and grace. Being broke and tired, you don’t come home your best self.

    These days you’re teaching at Syracuse University and you’ve published two other short-story collections, “Pastoralia” and “CivilWarLand in Bad Decline.” Might you try writing a novel in the future?

    I just did. It’s very innovative. It is only 25 pages long.

    Ha, ha. I see you’ve also published a children’s book, “The Very Persistent Gappers of Frip,” which will be rereleased this month.

    I wrote it for my two daughters when they were little. That for me was the big turning point in my artistic life, when my wife and I had our kids. The world got infused with morality again. Every person in the world should theoretically be loved as much as I love my daughters. It’s that Martin Buber “I and Thou” thing. Even this lowly wino was once somebody’s beloved son. Or should have been.

    How much do you think we owe that wino?

    Chekhov put it best. He said every happy man should have an unhappy man in his closet, with a hammer, to remind him that not everyone is happy.

    Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company


     







    Today’s Papers


    Three Feet Higher
    By Joshua Kucera
    Posted Thursday, April 13, 2006, at 5:32 AM ET


    The Washington Post leads with the release of the long-awaited federal government guidelines for rebuilding New Orleans and a $2.5 billion plan for levee reconstruction. Under the plans, 98 percent of the population in the New Orleans area would be able to return to their homes. The top nonlocal New York Times story is the Zacarias Moussaoui trial and the first public playing of the cockpit recording of United Flight 93. That story also led the Wall Street Journal‘s world-wide newsbox and was fronted by USA Today. The Los Angeles Times leads, at least online, with a follow-up to its amazing stories of flash memory drives with highly sensitive U.S. military data being sold in bazaars in Afghanistan.


    USA Today leads with the FBI’s caseload of white-collar and drug crimes dropping dramatically. Since 2001, when the bureau started focusing more on terrorism, the overall number of FBI-led prosecutions has declined 25 percent. At the same time the number of terrorism-related cases and convictionsstill a small portion of the FBI’s total workloadhas risen rapidly. But the paper notes that the average prison sentence for the terrorism cases is half that for drug convictions. One analyst suggests the bureau may be padding its numbers by labeling immigration violations as terrorism.


    The post-Katrina New Orleans plan would require most homeowners to raise the levels of their houses to 3 feet above the grounda curious figure, given that the water was so much higher than that in so much of the city. One expert calls the 3-foot requirement “wacky.” Less wacky is the cost of raising a house that muchabout $60,000, according to USA Today. The NYT emphasizes the relative lenience of the rebuilding guidelines, given many residents’ worries that parts of the city would be abandoned. The WP focuses instead on the possibility that Louisiana may have to pay as much as $900 million of the levee-reconstruction costs.


    The tape of Flight 93which was played as the culmination of the prosecution’s case that Moussaoui should get the death penaltydepicted an “animalistic” struggle in the cockpit as passengers tried to break in to thwart the hijacking plot. The descriptions of the tape are riveting, so those of us not in the courtroom can only imagine how it was to actually hear it. Still, none of the papers really address what relevance the tape had to the Moussaoui case. As the Post puts it, “The trial seemed an afterthought yesterday amid the drama of the recording.”


    In the latest episode in the flash drive series, the Times reporter buys a drive for $40 containing detailed information about Afghan spies employed by the United States. Intelligence seems to be one of the few things the military doesn’t overpay forone Afghan spying on al-Qaida gets $15 for every successful mission. Among other helpful information on the drive: the layout and defense plans of a (formerly) “low-visibility” special operations base in southern Afghanistan. The top U.S. commander in the country has ordered a review of how soldiers keep track of computer hardware.


    The LAT also fronts a poll showing that a large majority of Americans supports an immigration plan that would both tighten enforcement of the border and create a guest-worker program, rather than an enforcement-only approach. Any plan containing amnesty seems not to have been polled. The same survey showed 49 percent of Americans planned to vote for a Democrat in the Congressional elections this fall, and 35 percent for Republicans. It also showed that 40 percent of Americans don’t support military action against Iran even if Tehran continues to get closer to having nuclear weapons, as opposed to 48 percent who would support an attack.* If the U.S. attacks, a fearless 25 percent favor sending in ground troops.


    The Post fronts, and LAT stuffs, another general piling on the criticism of Donald Rumsfeld. This time it’s a former division commander in Iraq.


    The conflict in Darfur could be spreading: Early-morning wire reports say there has been heavy fighting inside Chad’s capitol. Chadian rebels based in Darfur are clashing with government forces and appear to be intent on taking the capital. France is bolstering the contingent of 1,200 troops it maintains in Chad.


    Michael Jackson is close to a deal that would involve him selling one of his prized assetshis share in a catalog of 4,000 songs including most of the Beatles’ hits, the NYT reports. Jackson bought the publishing rights to the songs for $47.5 million in 1984 but is in “a lengthy slide toward insolvency,” as the Times puts it, and is trying to stave off bankruptcy by refinancing hundreds of millions in loans. The catalog also includes songs by Bob Dylan, Neil Diamond, and Garth Brooks.


    Correction, April 13, 2006: This article originally and incorrectly stated that a Los Angeles Times poll found that 48 percent of respondents would not support military action against Iran if the country continued to develop nuclear weapons materials, while 40 percent of respondents would support military action. In fact, 48 percent of respondents stated that they would support military action, while 40 percent would not. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

    Joshua Kucera is a freelance writer based in Washington, D.C.



     







    U.N. Atomic Agency Investigates Iran’s Claims










    Islamic Republic News Agency, via Reuters
    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, who said on Wednesday that Iranian scientists had enriched uranium to a high level.


    April 13, 2006


    U.N. Atomic Agency Investigates Iran’s Claims




    The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said during a visit to Tehran today that inspectors took samples to confirm that Iran had enriched uranium to 3.5 percent, a low level used to fuel nuclear power stations.


    The collection of samples is part of a routine verification process in nuclear inspection.


    Hoping to help Iran avoid a confrontation with the West, Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the agency, held talks with Iranian officials today at the start of visit intended to persuade Iran to take measures to reassure the international community, including the suspension of uranium enrichment until “outstanding issues are clarified.”


    But the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, set the stage for the visit by declaring earlier today that Iran would refuse to talk with Dr. ElBaradei about its right to perform enrichment, and he lashed out again at Western critics.


    “Our answer to those who are angry about Iran obtaining the full nuclear cycle is one phrase we say: Be angry and die of this anger,” he said in comments to the IRNA news agency in Iran.


    With nationalistic fanfare, Mr. Ahmadinejad announced Tuesday that Iran had joined the group of nuclear nations after successfully enriching uranium to 3.5 percent at the laboratory level and said Tehran was determined to develop its nuclear program on an industrial scale.


    “I cannot confirm that,” Dr. ElBaradei said, when asked about the enrichment.


    “Our inspectors have taken samples,” he said in remarks that were reported by news agencies after he held talks with Iranian officials. “They will report to the board.”


    Iran tried to use the announcement to political advantage and position itself as having accomplished a step in its nuclear program that was unstoppable, despite Western pressure to suspend it.


    Dr. ElBaradei held talks today with Ali Larijani, the chief nuclear negotiator. An I.A.E.A, spokeswoman, Melissa Fleming, told CNN in an interview broadcast from Tehran that no commitments to suspend enrichment were made by Iran “at this point.”


    Iran’s announcement brought criticism from several Western nations and to a lesser degree from Russia and China. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has called for “strong steps” against Iran and for the United Nations Security Council to take action when it convenes again on the issue.


    The White House has asserted that Iran is secretly trying to develop fuel for nuclear weapons and said after Mr. Ahmadinejad’s remarks on Tuesday that Iran was “moving in the wrong direction.”


    Iran argues that it has the right to pursue a nuclear program that it says is for industrial purposes.


    The deputy head of Iran’s atomic energy organization, Muhammad Saeedi, said Wednesday that Iran would defy international pressure and rapidly expand its ability to enrich uranium for fuel by said pushing to put 54,000 centrifuges on line a vast increase from the 164 the Iranians said Tuesday that they had used to enrich uranium to 3.5 percent.


    Western nuclear analysts said Tehran lacked the skills, materials and equipment to make good on its immediate nuclear ambitions. They said nothing had changed to alter current estimates of when Iran might be able to make a single nuclear weapon, assuming that is its ultimate goal. The United States government has estimated that Iran could develop a nuclear weapon in 5 to 10 years, and some analysts have said it could come as late as 2020.


    The head of Russia’s nuclear agency, Sergei Kiriyenko, flatly declared today that Mr. Saeedi’s plans for a quick increase in production was not realistic.


    “Industrial uranium enrichment is out of the question,” given the state of Iran’s program, he told Russia’s state news agency.


    China announced today that it would send a high-level envoy to Tehran and Moscow for talks on the issue, according to Xinhua, the state news agency. “China is concerned about the statement by the Iranian side and is worried about the way in which things are developing,” said Liu Jianchao, a Foreign Ministry spokesman.


    Dr. ElBaradei is required to report back to Security Council members by April 28 on whether Iran has agreed to the demand late last month that it shut down its nuclear facilities within 30 days.


    Today, the American ambassador to the United Nations, John R. Bolton, said Washington was waiting for the outcome of the talks between Dr. ElBaradei and the Iranian government. “When we get information on that we will consider what to do next,” he said.


    John O’Neil contributed reporting from New York for this article.



Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *