April 13, 2006
-
New Stadium for New York Mets
The New York Mets
On Thursday,April 6, Gov. George Pataki, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Mets owner Fred Wilpon announced plans for a new Mets home.
The new ballpark, to be built in the parking lot of the existing Queens ballpark, Shea Stadium, will have a capacity of 45,000, down from the current 57,333
The New York Mets
In the current design, fans will enter the ballpark through an Ebbets-like rotunda with 65-foot ceilings
The New York Mets
The plan lacks a retractable roof that was jettisoned for its cost of $150 million to $200 million.
The New York Mets
The estimated cost of the projec is $780 million $600 million from the team to build the stadium and $180 million for infrastructure and capital costs from the city and state
The New York Mets
The City Council is expected to review the Mets’ stadium financing plan on Monday, April 9, 2006.
The New York Mets
Although the planned stadium still requires regulatory approval, Mets officials hope to put their team on a new field by 2009.
April 7, 2006
Wilpon Is Walking Again Through Ebbets Rotunda
By RICHARD SANDOMIR
Eight years after they displayed a model of a stadium that echoed the look of Ebbets Field, the Mets showed off a 21st-century version of the design yesterday amid hopes that they can start building in June and take the field in the corporate-named ballpark at the start of the 2009 season.
The new version of the 45,000-seat stadium has fewer seats and luxury suites (58, down from 78) than the first plan and lacks a retractable roof that was jettisoned because of the $150 million to $200 million price tag.
But the alterations have done nothing to reduce the vivid emotional attachment of Fred Wilpon, the Mets’ principal owner and a Brooklyn native, to the now-sainted Ebbets, the Brooklyn Dodgers’ long-dead home. In the current design, fans will enter the ballpark through an Ebbets-like rotunda with 65-foot-high ceilings.
“When I look at the designs, as I often do,” Wilpon said during a news conference at 42-year-old Shea Stadium, which, when it is demolished, is not likely to evoke architectural reveries, “I almost feel like I’m walking through the rotunda, 8 or 9 years old, holding my dad’s hand.”
Here, his voice broke, before he was able to speak again.
The estimated $765 million project up to $600 million from the team for the stadium and $165 million from the city and state for infrastructure, site preparation and other costs has prompted little of the community opposition that the Yankees have encountered.
The Mets have avoided major resistance because they are building their new stadium east of Shea, in their parking lot, not displacing parkland, as the Yankees are by building on 22 acres in Macomb’s Dam and Mullaly Parks.
The City Council approved construction of the Yankees’ new stadium on Wednesday, a product of the team’s agreement with Bronx officials to contribute $50 million over 20 years to local community groups. The Council was expected to review the Mets’ stadium financing plan on Monday along with the financing plan for the Yankees’ new stadium.
But Councilman Hiram Monserrate, whose district includes Shea, persuaded Council members to delay the review of the Mets’ plan until the team agrees to provide benefits to the local community.
“If the residents of the Bronx benefited from an agreement with the New York Yankees, why shouldn’t the residents of Queens benefit from an agreement with the New York Mets?” Monserrate said.
The prospect of community groups demanding a Yankee-like benefits deal from the Mets angered Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. “Every development project in this city is not just going to be a horn of plenty for everybody that wants to grab something,” he said at the news conference. New development, he said, should not be a rush to “line up to get some ransom.”
The deal was put together last June after plans to construct an Olympic stadium on Manhattan’s West Side were killed. Bloomberg made a commitment to help the Mets build a ballpark that would have been the centerpiece for the 2012 Games in an 11th-hour plan to salvage the city’s bid.
In planning a smaller stadium than the one they are leaving, the Mets are following a baseball trend. The 45,000 seats is 12,000 fewer than capacity at Shea, which only occasionally sells out. The baseball-only design (Shea was built for the Mets and the Jets) and seating angled toward the infield are intended to increase the intimacy of attending a game.
The design reflects Ebbets’s grip on Wilpon and the ballparks built since the 1990′s like Oriole Park at Camden Yards, PNC Park in Pittsburgh and Keyspan Park, where the Brooklyn Cyclones, the Mets’ Class A team, play.
It will have a brick and limestone exterior, accented with archways and exposed steel; a section of the right-field seats will hang over the field (at Ebbets Field, the outfield seats were in left and center); and its wide concourses will let fans circle the stadium without obstacles to watching the game. Like Shea, it will have pitcher-friendly dimensions.
“I happen to like Pittsburgh a lot,” said Jeff Wilpon, the Mets’ chief operating officer, whose love of bridges, like Hell Gate Bridge over the East River, is seen in the design. “I’ve seen things in San Diego that are very nice. Then you take something at Cleveland and Camden.”
The architect, HOK Sport, has designed many of the new stadiums in baseball, including the new Yankee ballpark. “Fred’s passion is the rotunda and the experience,” said Mike Sabatini, the HOK designer of the Mets’ park. “Jeff is more in tune with what’s going on in other ballparks.”
There was a time when the Mets and the Yankees believed public money should pay for most or all of their stadiums. In 2001, former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani made a nonbinding agreement with the teams to finance half the cost of two $800 million ballparks, a deal that Bloomberg scotched as unaffordable soon after he took office early the next year.
Now, both teams are paying to build their stadiums, with the city and state helping with associated costs.
The Mets will pay no rent at the new stadium and will have their rent reduced by $15 million until they leave Shea, as part of their state deal. The Yankees also have a rent-free deal. The teams now pay rent, but the city absorbs the costs of maintaining their stadiums.
The Mets and Yankees will also be able to reduce the revenues they share with other major league teams by the amount of debt payments they are making.
The stadiums are expected to generate substantially more revenues from tickets, luxury suites, club seats and naming rights like the $6 million that Minute Maid pays each year to be attached to the Houston Astro’s ballpark.
Winnie Hu contributed reporting forthis article.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Casino Can Change the Slot Machine in Seconds
John Gurzinski for The New York Times
Kevin and Tracy Newman, on vacation from Minnesota, tried the remotely controlled slot machines at the Treasure Island casino in Las Vegas.
John Gurzinski for The New York Times
Justin Beltram, director of slot operations at the Treasure Island casino in Las Vegas, can reprogram machines with a few mouse clicks.
April 12, 2006
From the Back Office, a Casino Can Change the Slot Machine in Seconds
By MATT RICHTEL
LAS VEGAS, April 6 From his small back office in the Treasure Island casino, Justin Beltram may soon be able to change the wheels of fortune instantly.
Mr. Beltram, a casino executive, is the point man in a high-technology experiment that could alter the face of slot machines, and their insides, too.
With a few clicks of his computer mouse, Mr. Beltram can reprogram the 1,790 slot machines on the casino floor, adjusting the denominations required to play, payback percentages, even game themes.
Las Vegas is constantly tinkering with its slot machines, which generate more than $7 billion annually in Nevada, roughly double that taken in by table games. Despite their growing popularity and an increase in overall gambling proceeds in recent years, casino operators want to win back more of the money their customers are now spending elsewhere on food, lodging and other entertainment, or at Indian casinos or for online gambling.
In the past, changing out a slot machine was a complicated operation and entailed opening it, replacing the computer chip inside, then changing the glass display that markets the game’s theme. The alteration usually took a day and could cost thousands of dollars, from ordering parts to modifying the machine.
“Now, I just come to my office, and select the program,” said Mr. Beltram, the 28-year-old executive director for slots at Treasure Island, which is owned by the MGM Mirage. “With the technology, it takes 20 seconds.”
The concept is being tested for the next few months under the gaze of state gambling regulators. If regulators approve, casino operators will be able to centrally adjust the slots to cater to different crowds older players and regulars during the day and younger tourists and people with bigger budgets at night.
That could mean testing consumer confidence as well. Some critics wonder whether centrally controlled slots are not a few steps away from the distant, but instant and unchecked control enjoyed by Internet casino operators.
Mr. Beltram insists he does not plan to capriciously change the odds, which he said would be bad for repeat business and could run afoul of regulators.
The development of networked slots underscores the growing convergence of gambling and technology. Slot machines, once highly mechanized, are now highly computerized; only about half the machines have actual spinning cylinders. The rest are computer-generated facsimiles that allow gamblers to play numerous animated reels at once, and induce them with the promise of bonus rounds. Gamblers now insert debit slips that track how much money they have, making the coins people once collected in buckets a distant memory.
Coming soon are high-definition screens that will enhance the animation to keep gamblers engaged and draw bigger crowds, and even better speakers to project crisp sound right at players.
More generally, casino operators have sought in recent years to use technology to offer new games and make a science of their business. They are experimenting with stocking blackjack tables with money chips embedded with digital tags that can automatically measure how much a gambler has wagered and on what kinds of hands.
Casinos also are testing wireless devices that would allow people to play games like Keno and eventually blackjack while sitting in public areas, like the swimming pool.
But these advances are raising some eyebrows. In the case of the new slot machines, regulators want to make sure the systems cannot be invaded by outsiders, while consumers want to know casino operators cannot too easily manipulate the odds, said David G. Schwartz, director for the Center for Gaming Research at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.
“Let’s say you’re playing at 2 and you’re doing great and you come back at 6 and the pay tables have changed,” Mr. Schwartz said, adding that he wondered how much latitude casino operators would have to change their returns.
He also worries that some players could receive preferential odds if, for instance, they are high rollers, thus creating an uneven gambling field.
By law, Nevada casinos must on average return at least 75 percent of slot machine wagers. The reality is they return more than 90 percent, casino operators say, though they do not publicize the figures. Also under the law, they cannot modify the payback percentages while someone is playing.
State law allows them to change the odds after a machine has been idle for four minutes, and then they must not allow anyone to play the machine for four more minutes. During that time, the screen must indicate a change is being made to the game’s configuration, said Travis Foley, laboratory manager for the technology division of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board, who is overseeing the Treasure Island test.
Typically, those changes now are made in the middle of the night when there are fewer players in the casino.
Mr. Foley said the technology “does expedite the change” to a new theme, wager denomination or payback percentage. “But it’s not a new capability.”
For his part, Mr. Beltram said fierce competition for slot machine players would keep him from playing fast and loose with his odds. The bigger goal, he said, is to cater inexpensively to consumer demand. He cites as evidence a recent visit by a high roller from Rhode Island.
Mr. Beltram said the gambler, who liked to play slots in the high-stakes slots room where individual wagers can go from $2 into the hundreds of dollars, requested a $25 Double Diamond slot machine. Mr. Beltram ordered the computer chip and glass plate from International Game Technology, which makes the machine, and had them in place 24 hours later.
The lost day potentially cut into profits. If the customer had been able to play earlier, “Who knows what he would have spent?” Mr. Beltram said. As it turned out, the high roller returned a day later, played the new game and wound up winning money.
But a lot of money is left on the table with low rollers as well. It’s just a matter of giving them what they want when they want it, Mr. Beltram said. “Throughout the day, there are more locals, so during the day we might have more video poker. At night, we might have more slots,” he said. “Customers get stuck on themes they like,” he said, and those themes can be programmed in.
Mr. Beltram said he expected the system to be in place by the end of this year or the beginning of next year.
Ed Rogich, spokesman for International Gaming Technology, said a similar test was taking place at a casino operated by the Barona Indian tribe, just outside of San Diego.
Most casinos already link their slot machines and can view their performance from a central server. The difference is that the latest advance is the first time casinos can push information out to all their machines, creating the potential for “dumb terminals,” as they are known outside gambling, on which the software can be modified centrally, easily and instantly.
The concept of networked slot machines is undergoing a different kind of test down the street from Treasure Island at a casino called the Barbary Coast. There, near the front door, sits an enormous circular wheel of fortune slot machine with seats around it for nine players. In front of each player is a monitor on which they play an individualized version of the game. The twist is that a monitor in the center of the game, viewable by all, indicates which players have hit the bonus round.
At various points, those players who have hit the bonus round meaning they are eligible to increase their winnings by a certain multiple can cause the wheel of fortune in the center to spin; whatever number lands in front of each eligible player indicates the bonus amount.
The individual players are not affecting each other’s outcomes, but the game creates a feeling of community, almost like craps players cheering for each other at the table.
Regular slot players say they have mixed feelings about the potential for the centrally controlled games.
Rexie Lestrange, who lives in Lodi, Calif., and was recently visiting Las Vegas on business, said she welcomed the next generation of slot machines.
“I liked all kinds of pictures and noises and things happening,” she said as she sat in Treasure Island playing Lawman’s Loot, a penny slot machine with a reel of video images of cowboys, trains, settlers and bags of loot. “The old slots I don’t like because they’re boring.”
But she said she did not have an opinion about the casinos using servers to change their slot machines.
“I just wish they would pay out more, obviously,” she said.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
